正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Justice for Cambodia. Balanced coverage promotes understanding. One-sided narratives promote polarization. #BalancedReporting #BothSidesOfTheStory #FairJournalism #ThailandStartedTheWar #Cambodianeedpeace

naturization's profile picture

Viral Feed

99,490 subscribers

84,864 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治教育#BalancedReporting#BothSidesOfTheStory#FairJournalism#ThailandStartedTheWar#Cambodianeedpeace
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The world often looks to #BlackAmericans to lead protests against systemic injustice, rooted in our history of resilience and activism. However, when it's time for non-Black individuals to offer support, many are absent, frequently perpetuating negative stereotypes instead. This one-sided dynamic highlights a troubling reality: while we bear the burden of the struggle for justice, the same commitment is rarely returned. This skepticism towards allyship arises because it often feels performative rather than genuine. True solidarity demands more than words—it requires consistent action, accountability, and a deep understanding of our experiences. #KushNation🔴🔱⚫️
3:01

The world often looks to #BlackAmericans to lead protests against systemic injustice, rooted in our history of resilience and activism. However, when it's time for non-Black individuals to offer support, many are absent, frequently perpetuating negative stereotypes instead. This one-sided dynamic highlights a troubling reality: while we bear the burden of the struggle for justice, the same commitment is rarely returned. This skepticism towards allyship arises because it often feels performative rather than genuine. True solidarity demands more than words—it requires consistent action, accountability, and a deep understanding of our experiences. #KushNation🔴🔱⚫️

MF KUSH 🔴🔱⚫️

18,575 次观看 • 6 个月前

Typical ABC: parading gullible children who have been systematically brainwashed into despising their own country. These impressionable young minds have been deliberately taught to hate Australia — conditioned to feel ashamed of our history, heritage, and culture through relentless guilt-tripping and one-sided narratives that airbrush our British inheritance. If the ABC were genuinely balanced, it would air a program called "What the British Gave Us" and honestly catalogue the immense legacy we inherited: the English language that unites us, the common law tradition that underpins our justice system and individual rights, the principles of the Magna Carta that established the rule of law and limits on arbitrary power (still influencing Australian constitutional thinking today), parliamentary democracy, and Britain’s pioneering role in abolishing the slave trade and then slavery itself across its empire. They’d also remind us that it was British taxpayers who funded the First Fleet (and many after) that paid for the founding of the colonies, that provided defence and security for much of our early history, and paid for the infrastructure that helped build a prosperous settler society. But the chances of the ABC presenting such a program are zero. It’s well past time to defund the ABC. Australian taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise this one-sided, taxpayer-funded anti-Australian propaganda.
1:23

Typical ABC: parading gullible children who have been systematically brainwashed into despising their own country. These impressionable young minds have been deliberately taught to hate Australia — conditioned to feel ashamed of our history, heritage, and culture through relentless guilt-tripping and one-sided narratives that airbrush our British inheritance. If the ABC were genuinely balanced, it would air a program called "What the British Gave Us" and honestly catalogue the immense legacy we inherited: the English language that unites us, the common law tradition that underpins our justice system and individual rights, the principles of the Magna Carta that established the rule of law and limits on arbitrary power (still influencing Australian constitutional thinking today), parliamentary democracy, and Britain’s pioneering role in abolishing the slave trade and then slavery itself across its empire. They’d also remind us that it was British taxpayers who funded the First Fleet (and many after) that paid for the founding of the colonies, that provided defence and security for much of our early history, and paid for the infrastructure that helped build a prosperous settler society. But the chances of the ABC presenting such a program are zero. It’s well past time to defund the ABC. Australian taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise this one-sided, taxpayer-funded anti-Australian propaganda.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

14,089 次观看 • 1 个月前

Bareilly Wedding Turns Ugly: Groom Breaks Silence A day after a bride accused the groom of demanding ₹20 lakh and a car, the 29-year-old groom hit back with disturbing allegations. He claims the marriage was called off not because of dowry, but because the bride and her family repeatedly body-shamed him for being plus-sized. The groom further alleges that on the wedding day, his family was held hostage, and jewellery and valuables were looted at the bride’s house. He says the family is now demanding ₹50 lakh even after cancelling the wedding. This case exposes a familiar pattern: first the viral accusation, later the man’s side—ignored, delayed, doubted. When men speak, it’s called an “excuse”. When women speak, it’s declared “truth”. Justice cannot survive on one-sided narratives. The Times Of India
0:09

Bareilly Wedding Turns Ugly: Groom Breaks Silence A day after a bride accused the groom of demanding ₹20 lakh and a car, the 29-year-old groom hit back with disturbing allegations. He claims the marriage was called off not because of dowry, but because the bride and her family repeatedly body-shamed him for being plus-sized. The groom further alleges that on the wedding day, his family was held hostage, and jewellery and valuables were looted at the bride’s house. He says the family is now demanding ₹50 lakh even after cancelling the wedding. This case exposes a familiar pattern: first the viral accusation, later the man’s side—ignored, delayed, doubted. When men speak, it’s called an “excuse”. When women speak, it’s declared “truth”. Justice cannot survive on one-sided narratives. The Times Of India

ShoneeKapoor

63,282 次观看 • 7 个月前

When you talk about the Mount Rushmore of outside linebackers, JACK HAM belongs on it. Not because he was the loudest or chased headlines. But because he perfected the position in a way few ever have, blending elite coverage, run-stopping precision, and big-play instincts into a flawless package. Ham played with rare discipline, anticipation, and range. He erased tight ends in coverage, closed run lanes before they formed, and turned third downs into non-events. While some overwhelmed with raw force, Ham dismantled offenses through pure understanding — always early, always balanced, always in the right spot. In the heart of the Steel Curtain dynasty — surrounded by Hall of Famers like Mean Joe Greene, JackLambert, and Mel Blount — Ham was the quiet constant Chuck Noll trusted most. He didn’t freelance. He didn’t guess. He diagnosed and solved plays faster than offenses could adjust. The resume is elite: • Six consecutive First-Team All-Pro selections • Eight straight Pro Bowls • Four Super Bowl rings as a cornerstone of one of the NFL’s greatest defenses • 32 career interceptions • 21 fumble recoveries • 25+ sacks (unofficial) • 53 total takeaways — the most in NFL history by any non-defensive back Those numbers aren’t just good — they’re historic. But his greatness goes beyond stats. He was the gold standard for the complete outside linebacker: elite in coverage (often called the best coverage linebacker ever), lockdown against the run, instinctive blitzer, and virtually mistake-free. Every legendary defense also needs a constant — the player who never beats himself, who anchors everything, who makes the unit elite. Jack Ham was that constant on one of the most dominant defenses football has ever seen. That’s why his name belongs carved in stone alongside Lawrence Taylor and the very best outside linebackers the game has ever known. The Hammer wasn’t flashy — he was simply perfect. Thank you for reading. If you enjoy this kind of work, please give me a follow 🙏. #Steelers #HereWeGo #NFL
0:29

When you talk about the Mount Rushmore of outside linebackers, JACK HAM belongs on it. Not because he was the loudest or chased headlines. But because he perfected the position in a way few ever have, blending elite coverage, run-stopping precision, and big-play instincts into a flawless package. Ham played with rare discipline, anticipation, and range. He erased tight ends in coverage, closed run lanes before they formed, and turned third downs into non-events. While some overwhelmed with raw force, Ham dismantled offenses through pure understanding — always early, always balanced, always in the right spot. In the heart of the Steel Curtain dynasty — surrounded by Hall of Famers like Mean Joe Greene, JackLambert, and Mel Blount — Ham was the quiet constant Chuck Noll trusted most. He didn’t freelance. He didn’t guess. He diagnosed and solved plays faster than offenses could adjust. The resume is elite: • Six consecutive First-Team All-Pro selections • Eight straight Pro Bowls • Four Super Bowl rings as a cornerstone of one of the NFL’s greatest defenses • 32 career interceptions • 21 fumble recoveries • 25+ sacks (unofficial) • 53 total takeaways — the most in NFL history by any non-defensive back Those numbers aren’t just good — they’re historic. But his greatness goes beyond stats. He was the gold standard for the complete outside linebacker: elite in coverage (often called the best coverage linebacker ever), lockdown against the run, instinctive blitzer, and virtually mistake-free. Every legendary defense also needs a constant — the player who never beats himself, who anchors everything, who makes the unit elite. Jack Ham was that constant on one of the most dominant defenses football has ever seen. That’s why his name belongs carved in stone alongside Lawrence Taylor and the very best outside linebackers the game has ever known. The Hammer wasn’t flashy — he was simply perfect. Thank you for reading. If you enjoy this kind of work, please give me a follow 🙏. #Steelers #HereWeGo #NFL

NFLHuddle 🏈

26,613 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is the glaring hypocrisy that exposes Britain’s two-tier media and outrage machine in 2026. A brave street survey in central London asked ordinary people one simple question: do you know the story of Henry Nowak? The 17-year-old boy was brutally stabbed to death in Southampton. As he lay choking on his own blood, desperately begging for help, police allegedly accused him of racism and slapped him in handcuffs while he bled out. No ambulance. No urgent medical aid. Just restraints on a dying British teenager. The responses? Blank faces. Most had never heard the name. Zero outrage. Zero protests. Almost zero mainstream media coverage. The story barely registered. Compare that to the death of George Floyd in America — a case that triggered wall-to-wall coverage, parliamentary minutes of silence, Black Lives Matter marches across Britain, and endless lectures from politicians about systemic racism. The entire establishment mobilised for a foreign tragedy, yet when a British boy dies in horrific circumstances involving police and a racism smear against the victim, the silence is deafening. Isn’t it weird? Henry Nowak deserved the same national attention, the same fury, the same demand for answers. Instead, the media and political class treat British victims as disposable footnotes while amplifying foreign narratives that fit their agenda. This isn’t oversight. This is deliberate. Native lives matter less in the eyes of those who control the narrative. The British public is waking up to this rank double standard. Our children, our communities, our sense of justice are being sidelined while the system bends over backwards for every imported cause. Enough is enough. Henry Nowak’s name should be known. His story should be told. And the two-tier outrage machine that ignores him while worshipping foreign martyrs needs to be called out for what it is.
1:34

This is the glaring hypocrisy that exposes Britain’s two-tier media and outrage machine in 2026. A brave street survey in central London asked ordinary people one simple question: do you know the story of Henry Nowak? The 17-year-old boy was brutally stabbed to death in Southampton. As he lay choking on his own blood, desperately begging for help, police allegedly accused him of racism and slapped him in handcuffs while he bled out. No ambulance. No urgent medical aid. Just restraints on a dying British teenager. The responses? Blank faces. Most had never heard the name. Zero outrage. Zero protests. Almost zero mainstream media coverage. The story barely registered. Compare that to the death of George Floyd in America — a case that triggered wall-to-wall coverage, parliamentary minutes of silence, Black Lives Matter marches across Britain, and endless lectures from politicians about systemic racism. The entire establishment mobilised for a foreign tragedy, yet when a British boy dies in horrific circumstances involving police and a racism smear against the victim, the silence is deafening. Isn’t it weird? Henry Nowak deserved the same national attention, the same fury, the same demand for answers. Instead, the media and political class treat British victims as disposable footnotes while amplifying foreign narratives that fit their agenda. This isn’t oversight. This is deliberate. Native lives matter less in the eyes of those who control the narrative. The British public is waking up to this rank double standard. Our children, our communities, our sense of justice are being sidelined while the system bends over backwards for every imported cause. Enough is enough. Henry Nowak’s name should be known. His story should be told. And the two-tier outrage machine that ignores him while worshipping foreign martyrs needs to be called out for what it is.

Right over Left Everytime

20,050 次观看 • 2 个月前

[SAPS CONDEMNS OFFENSIVE TRIBALISTIC SLURS AGAINST KZN SPOKESMAN] The South African Police Service (SAPS) condemns in the strongest possible terms the discrimination and offensive remarks directed at one of its dedicated, hardworking, and highly qualified spokespersons, who executes his duties with diligence and professionalism. The SAPS has noted with concern the derogatory and tribalistic slurs captured in a recording outside a police station, in which a woman admonished a SAPS spokesperson for not communicating with her in isiZulu and referred to him as a “kwerekwere” which is a deeply offensive term used to label someone as a foreigner. Colonel Robert Netshiunda was born and raised in Limpopo, which is one of South Africa’s nine provinces. His home language is Tshivenda, one of the country’s twelve official languages. His presence in KwaZulu-Natal reflects the diversity and unity that define the SAPS. The SAPS takes this opportunity to remind communities that discrimination against any individual based on culture, language, or race is unacceptable and undermines the constitutional values upon which our democracy is founded. The province of KwaZulu-Natal is home not only to isiZulu-speaking communities but to people from diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. SAPS actively promotes integration, mutual respect, and inclusivity among all communities and within its own ranks. It is both unfair and disappointing for any member of the public to display such behaviour towards a police officer who is highly qualified and dedicated to serving and protecting all who live in this country. The SAPS calls for greater social cohesion among the communities we serve and urges the public to promote tolerance, respect, and understanding of different cultures and languages. Our police stations are staffed by members from a wide range of cultural and ethnic backgrounds, reflecting the rich diversity of South Africa. This diversity strengthens our ability to serve communities effectively. The SAPS once again congratulates Colonel Netshiunda for being recognized as Administration officer of the year at the recently held KZN Provincial Commissioners Excellence Awards. 📹: TikTok: @hrhprincesslondcarefound
7:32

[SAPS CONDEMNS OFFENSIVE TRIBALISTIC SLURS AGAINST KZN SPOKESMAN] The South African Police Service (SAPS) condemns in the strongest possible terms the discrimination and offensive remarks directed at one of its dedicated, hardworking, and highly qualified spokespersons, who executes his duties with diligence and professionalism. The SAPS has noted with concern the derogatory and tribalistic slurs captured in a recording outside a police station, in which a woman admonished a SAPS spokesperson for not communicating with her in isiZulu and referred to him as a “kwerekwere” which is a deeply offensive term used to label someone as a foreigner. Colonel Robert Netshiunda was born and raised in Limpopo, which is one of South Africa’s nine provinces. His home language is Tshivenda, one of the country’s twelve official languages. His presence in KwaZulu-Natal reflects the diversity and unity that define the SAPS. The SAPS takes this opportunity to remind communities that discrimination against any individual based on culture, language, or race is unacceptable and undermines the constitutional values upon which our democracy is founded. The province of KwaZulu-Natal is home not only to isiZulu-speaking communities but to people from diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. SAPS actively promotes integration, mutual respect, and inclusivity among all communities and within its own ranks. It is both unfair and disappointing for any member of the public to display such behaviour towards a police officer who is highly qualified and dedicated to serving and protecting all who live in this country. The SAPS calls for greater social cohesion among the communities we serve and urges the public to promote tolerance, respect, and understanding of different cultures and languages. Our police stations are staffed by members from a wide range of cultural and ethnic backgrounds, reflecting the rich diversity of South Africa. This diversity strengthens our ability to serve communities effectively. The SAPS once again congratulates Colonel Netshiunda for being recognized as Administration officer of the year at the recently held KZN Provincial Commissioners Excellence Awards. 📹: TikTok: @hrhprincesslondcarefound

Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

131,694 次观看 • 6 个月前

A FOLLOW-UP: THE WAY FORWARD I’d like to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the readers who engaged with yesterday’s post on the Fridge Murders. Your feedback, filled with deep concern and thoughtful suggestions, is a testament to the collective will to address this horrifying trend before it takes deeper root in society. Here’s a summary of the key proposals shared by readers to eradicate this chilling evil: Reader Suggestions 1. Promoting Spirituality and Accountability Raise awareness about God, spirituality, and the accountability of actions, both in this life and the hereafter. Encourage belief in divine justice to deter individuals from committing heinous crimes. 2. Strengthening the Justice System Implement stricter laws and harsher penalties, including capital punishment, for such brutal crimes. Ensure faster trials to deliver justice promptly and deter potential offenders. 3. Mental Health Awareness and Support Prioritize mental health services to address psychological distress and prevent such acts. Teach coping mechanisms for depression and feelings of inferiority from an early age. Promote meditation and spiritual practices to enhance emotional resilience. 4. Addressing Domestic Violence and Relationship Strains Spread awareness about domestic violence and provide better support systems for victims. Introduce early intervention programs for strained relationships. Encourage counseling and healthy communication within families. 5. Empathy and Compassion Instill empathy and compassion from a young age to build a kinder, more understanding society. Foster a culture of kindness and accountability at the community level. 6. Education and Community Engagement Educate individuals and communities on healthy relationships and conflict resolution. Promote relationship education, counseling, and support groups to help navigate challenges. Strengthen family and community support to prevent isolation and violence. 7. Reforms in Societal Norms Address societal stigmas, such as those around live-in relationships, and offer community support. Encourage open communication within families and communities to combat isolation. 8. Holistic Solutions Combine legal reforms, societal awareness, and mental health initiatives to address root causes. Focus on early education to instill moral values, emotional resilience, and conflict resolution skills. THE WAY FORWARD While every suggestion is valuable, a few key actions stand out: Institutions, organizations, and governments must prioritize early intervention, mental health awareness, and support systems. Governments must recognize this emerging evil and enact swift, severe deterrents, including capital punishment for such cases, adjudicated by fast-track courts. Above all, the most critical solution lies in raising awareness of the Law of Cause and Effect—a firm belief in the Creator, the Sustainer, and the ultimate Executor of Justice. It is essential to recognize that life continues beyond death, and escaping worldly punishment does not absolve one of eternal consequences. This belief in divine accountability is not a mere philosophical concept but a tangible reality that governs human actions. Interestingly, I came across a video clip of Shahid Kapoor eloquently presenting the validity of divine accountability in a simple yet profound manner. His perspective aligns with the essence of this message. The clip is attached here.
1:15

A FOLLOW-UP: THE WAY FORWARD I’d like to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the readers who engaged with yesterday’s post on the Fridge Murders. Your feedback, filled with deep concern and thoughtful suggestions, is a testament to the collective will to address this horrifying trend before it takes deeper root in society. Here’s a summary of the key proposals shared by readers to eradicate this chilling evil: Reader Suggestions 1. Promoting Spirituality and Accountability Raise awareness about God, spirituality, and the accountability of actions, both in this life and the hereafter. Encourage belief in divine justice to deter individuals from committing heinous crimes. 2. Strengthening the Justice System Implement stricter laws and harsher penalties, including capital punishment, for such brutal crimes. Ensure faster trials to deliver justice promptly and deter potential offenders. 3. Mental Health Awareness and Support Prioritize mental health services to address psychological distress and prevent such acts. Teach coping mechanisms for depression and feelings of inferiority from an early age. Promote meditation and spiritual practices to enhance emotional resilience. 4. Addressing Domestic Violence and Relationship Strains Spread awareness about domestic violence and provide better support systems for victims. Introduce early intervention programs for strained relationships. Encourage counseling and healthy communication within families. 5. Empathy and Compassion Instill empathy and compassion from a young age to build a kinder, more understanding society. Foster a culture of kindness and accountability at the community level. 6. Education and Community Engagement Educate individuals and communities on healthy relationships and conflict resolution. Promote relationship education, counseling, and support groups to help navigate challenges. Strengthen family and community support to prevent isolation and violence. 7. Reforms in Societal Norms Address societal stigmas, such as those around live-in relationships, and offer community support. Encourage open communication within families and communities to combat isolation. 8. Holistic Solutions Combine legal reforms, societal awareness, and mental health initiatives to address root causes. Focus on early education to instill moral values, emotional resilience, and conflict resolution skills. THE WAY FORWARD While every suggestion is valuable, a few key actions stand out: Institutions, organizations, and governments must prioritize early intervention, mental health awareness, and support systems. Governments must recognize this emerging evil and enact swift, severe deterrents, including capital punishment for such cases, adjudicated by fast-track courts. Above all, the most critical solution lies in raising awareness of the Law of Cause and Effect—a firm belief in the Creator, the Sustainer, and the ultimate Executor of Justice. It is essential to recognize that life continues beyond death, and escaping worldly punishment does not absolve one of eternal consequences. This belief in divine accountability is not a mere philosophical concept but a tangible reality that governs human actions. Interestingly, I came across a video clip of Shahid Kapoor eloquently presenting the validity of divine accountability in a simple yet profound manner. His perspective aligns with the essence of this message. The clip is attached here.

Syed Abdullah Tariq

15,688 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Dear Candace Owens, I was present at the mock trial of #BrigitteMacron. The main accusation against the defendants was that they had made retweets — yet some of those tweets were written by me! Having already been the victim of an assassination attempt by poisoning, my life is in danger. I am not suicidal. Thank you for continuing to promote the Truth: the spouse of the President of the French Republic is a pedocriminal; it is Jean-Michel Trogneux who lived in Algeria, not Brigitte, as she claimed during an official trip. I am the one who provided the proof to journalists, and the lawyers were able to use it during the trial. The current Minister of the Interior #LaurentNunez is protecting a child passport trafficking network tied to corruption — including cases involving my own children. I have supplied all the evidence, but the justice system does nothing. I also proved that terrorists were about to carry out an attack at Gare Saint-Lazare in Paris, yet the anti-terrorism prosecutor’s office did not open an investigation! Know that Macron hates your President Trump Donald J. Trump. France 🇫🇷, completely corrupt, has become PEDOLAND. Elon Musk Pavel Durov Julian Assange Edward Snowden Tucker Carlson Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives Kim Dotcom Andrew Tate Alex Jones Richard Strocher 𝕏 MONICA PAIGE✰TPUSA JD Vance Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 FBI Director Kash Patel Ivanka Trump Eric Trump
3:16

🚨 Dear Candace Owens, I was present at the mock trial of #BrigitteMacron. The main accusation against the defendants was that they had made retweets — yet some of those tweets were written by me! Having already been the victim of an assassination attempt by poisoning, my life is in danger. I am not suicidal. Thank you for continuing to promote the Truth: the spouse of the President of the French Republic is a pedocriminal; it is Jean-Michel Trogneux who lived in Algeria, not Brigitte, as she claimed during an official trip. I am the one who provided the proof to journalists, and the lawyers were able to use it during the trial. The current Minister of the Interior #LaurentNunez is protecting a child passport trafficking network tied to corruption — including cases involving my own children. I have supplied all the evidence, but the justice system does nothing. I also proved that terrorists were about to carry out an attack at Gare Saint-Lazare in Paris, yet the anti-terrorism prosecutor’s office did not open an investigation! Know that Macron hates your President Trump Donald J. Trump. France 🇫🇷, completely corrupt, has become PEDOLAND. Elon Musk Pavel Durov Julian Assange Edward Snowden Tucker Carlson Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives Kim Dotcom Andrew Tate Alex Jones Richard Strocher 𝕏 MONICA PAIGE✰TPUSA JD Vance Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 FBI Director Kash Patel Ivanka Trump Eric Trump

Morad EL HATTAB

38,049 次观看 • 9 个月前

The U.S. State Department and its 50 years of shadowy ties to GEORGE SOROS. George Soros's Open Society Foundations orchestrated a covert operation in Mongolia, partnering with the US State Department to sabotage a mining deal. Using WikiLeaks cables, Mike Benz reveals OSF funded "civil society" groups and protests to pressure the Mongolian government into renegotiating terms—ultimately benefiting mining giant Rio Tinto, where Soros's hedge fund held massive stakes. This wasn't philanthropy; it was a hedge fund play disguised as NGO activism, stripping Mongolia of fair profits while enriching Soros. But this Mongolian scheme is just one thread in OSF's global web. In the United States, critics argue OSF's activities go far beyond "promoting democracy"—they're systematically undermining American sovereignty, rule of law, and cultural cohesion through billions in funding to progressive causes. This is the breakdown of how OSF is accused of "destroying" the U.S., based on documented patterns. Weaponizing the Justice System via "Progressive" Prosecutors, OSF has poured over $140 million into electing district attorneys who prioritize "criminal justice reform" over enforcement. These Soros-backed DAs, like those in major cities, often decline to prosecute crimes, leading to spikes in urban chaos, repeat offenders, and eroded public safety. This isn't reform—it's intentional destabilization, creating a two-tiered justice system that weakens law and order while advancing a radical agenda. Fueling Mass Migration and Open Borders, OSF funds NGOs that advocate for unchecked immigration, sanctuary cities, and the dismantling of border enforcement. This includes groups pushing for policies that overwhelm social services, alter demographics, and strain resources—critics call it a "Great Replacement" strategy to shift electoral power and erode national identity. By partnering with entities like the Tides Foundation, OSF creates "astroturf" movements that make illegal migration seem like a humanitarian imperative, all while bypassing voter will. Controlling Narratives Through Media and "Fact-Checkers," with investments in journalism training and outlets, OSF shapes public discourse to vilify nationalism and promote globalism. This includes funding "watchdog" groups that censor dissent and amplify progressive ideologies, turning media into a tool for social engineering. In the U.S., this manifests as biased coverage on issues like crime, borders, and elections, eroding trust in institutions and polarizing society. Subverting Elections and Institutions, OSF's opaque, offshore funding structures channel money into voter mobilization, legal challenges, and activist networks that challenge election integrity and push for systemic changes. This mirrors the Mongolian playbook, using "civil society" as a front to influence outcomes for elite gain. In America, it's accused of fostering division through identity politics, DEI initiatives, and cultural subversion, aiming for a "color revolution" that replaces constitutional governance with technocratic control. Partnering with Government for Insider Influence, just like in Mongolia with the State Department, OSF collaborates with U.S. agencies and officials to advance its goals. This includes embedding allies in policy roles, funding "democracy promotion" that aligns with globalist interests, and using taxpayer dollars via grants to NGOs—turning philanthropy into a profit-driven political machine. OSF claims it's building "vibrant democracies," but detractors see a pattern of chaos creation for power consolidation. With $25B+ in assets and operations in 120 countries, this isn't charity—it's a blueprint for dismantling nations from within. Time to expose and defund this shadow empire. Mike Benz
29:56

The U.S. State Department and its 50 years of shadowy ties to GEORGE SOROS. George Soros's Open Society Foundations orchestrated a covert operation in Mongolia, partnering with the US State Department to sabotage a mining deal. Using WikiLeaks cables, Mike Benz reveals OSF funded "civil society" groups and protests to pressure the Mongolian government into renegotiating terms—ultimately benefiting mining giant Rio Tinto, where Soros's hedge fund held massive stakes. This wasn't philanthropy; it was a hedge fund play disguised as NGO activism, stripping Mongolia of fair profits while enriching Soros. But this Mongolian scheme is just one thread in OSF's global web. In the United States, critics argue OSF's activities go far beyond "promoting democracy"—they're systematically undermining American sovereignty, rule of law, and cultural cohesion through billions in funding to progressive causes. This is the breakdown of how OSF is accused of "destroying" the U.S., based on documented patterns. Weaponizing the Justice System via "Progressive" Prosecutors, OSF has poured over $140 million into electing district attorneys who prioritize "criminal justice reform" over enforcement. These Soros-backed DAs, like those in major cities, often decline to prosecute crimes, leading to spikes in urban chaos, repeat offenders, and eroded public safety. This isn't reform—it's intentional destabilization, creating a two-tiered justice system that weakens law and order while advancing a radical agenda. Fueling Mass Migration and Open Borders, OSF funds NGOs that advocate for unchecked immigration, sanctuary cities, and the dismantling of border enforcement. This includes groups pushing for policies that overwhelm social services, alter demographics, and strain resources—critics call it a "Great Replacement" strategy to shift electoral power and erode national identity. By partnering with entities like the Tides Foundation, OSF creates "astroturf" movements that make illegal migration seem like a humanitarian imperative, all while bypassing voter will. Controlling Narratives Through Media and "Fact-Checkers," with investments in journalism training and outlets, OSF shapes public discourse to vilify nationalism and promote globalism. This includes funding "watchdog" groups that censor dissent and amplify progressive ideologies, turning media into a tool for social engineering. In the U.S., this manifests as biased coverage on issues like crime, borders, and elections, eroding trust in institutions and polarizing society. Subverting Elections and Institutions, OSF's opaque, offshore funding structures channel money into voter mobilization, legal challenges, and activist networks that challenge election integrity and push for systemic changes. This mirrors the Mongolian playbook, using "civil society" as a front to influence outcomes for elite gain. In America, it's accused of fostering division through identity politics, DEI initiatives, and cultural subversion, aiming for a "color revolution" that replaces constitutional governance with technocratic control. Partnering with Government for Insider Influence, just like in Mongolia with the State Department, OSF collaborates with U.S. agencies and officials to advance its goals. This includes embedding allies in policy roles, funding "democracy promotion" that aligns with globalist interests, and using taxpayer dollars via grants to NGOs—turning philanthropy into a profit-driven political machine. OSF claims it's building "vibrant democracies," but detractors see a pattern of chaos creation for power consolidation. With $25B+ in assets and operations in 120 countries, this isn't charity—it's a blueprint for dismantling nations from within. Time to expose and defund this shadow empire. Mike Benz

The SCIF

41,240 次观看 • 8 个月前

More than 40 Fulani villages were recently sacked in a series of coordinated attacks that left scores of people dead, including women and children. In one of the most disturbing incidents, a pregnant woman was reportedly assaulted, leading to the death of both the woman and her unborn child. The attackers, said to be known to local authorities, allegedly made away with over 200 heads of livestock, which were loaded onto trucks and moved through several checkpoints without interception. Residents expressed shock that despite the heavy security presence in the area, no arrests were made, and no statement has been issued to condemn the incident. Community representatives said the persistent silence from both the media and relevant agencies has emboldened the perpetrators, deepening mistrust and resentment. “The world only hears what the Fulani are accused of doing, not what is being done to them,” one local elder said. “Without justice and fairness, peace can never be achieved.” One Fulani Elder said, In Nigeria, it is normal to kill an entire Fulani community and steal their livestock but when they retaliated back, it is a genocide or massacre. This is nothing short of hypocrisy. The failure to acknowledge or address these reprisals is worsening the fragile security situation in Benue and neighbouring states. They call for impartial investigations and balanced reporting to expose all sides of the conflict, not just those that fit existing narratives. The roots of the crisis in the North Central are complex, involving competition over land, resources, and mutual suspicions between farming and herding communities but insist that attributing the conflict solely to one group undermines reconciliation efforts. The state Government has failed to address the issue. For example the Benue state government had refused to condemn or address the seven days ultimatum given to the Fulani to leave Benue state despite being warned by security agencies. Since that announcement, the government backed militia have carried out heinous attacks and extra judicial killings in many Fulani communities. On the other hand the Fulanis have also carried out a series of attacks against communities in Benue which is being described as a massacre. The federal government should therefore hold the state government accountable for directly aiding and abating criminals who are committing atrocities as well as the conspiracy of silence over ongoing attacks in the North Central region. The continued injustice and selective reportage of the crisis will continue fuelling the violence if something is not urgently done about. Authorities must ensure protection for all communities, prosecute known attackers, whether Fulani bandits, from the government backed militia and foster dialogue aimed at ending the cycle of vengeance and bloodshed. Until justice is seen to be done, the violence in the region will continue to escalate under the weight of silence and neglect.
6:15

More than 40 Fulani villages were recently sacked in a series of coordinated attacks that left scores of people dead, including women and children. In one of the most disturbing incidents, a pregnant woman was reportedly assaulted, leading to the death of both the woman and her unborn child. The attackers, said to be known to local authorities, allegedly made away with over 200 heads of livestock, which were loaded onto trucks and moved through several checkpoints without interception. Residents expressed shock that despite the heavy security presence in the area, no arrests were made, and no statement has been issued to condemn the incident. Community representatives said the persistent silence from both the media and relevant agencies has emboldened the perpetrators, deepening mistrust and resentment. “The world only hears what the Fulani are accused of doing, not what is being done to them,” one local elder said. “Without justice and fairness, peace can never be achieved.” One Fulani Elder said, In Nigeria, it is normal to kill an entire Fulani community and steal their livestock but when they retaliated back, it is a genocide or massacre. This is nothing short of hypocrisy. The failure to acknowledge or address these reprisals is worsening the fragile security situation in Benue and neighbouring states. They call for impartial investigations and balanced reporting to expose all sides of the conflict, not just those that fit existing narratives. The roots of the crisis in the North Central are complex, involving competition over land, resources, and mutual suspicions between farming and herding communities but insist that attributing the conflict solely to one group undermines reconciliation efforts. The state Government has failed to address the issue. For example the Benue state government had refused to condemn or address the seven days ultimatum given to the Fulani to leave Benue state despite being warned by security agencies. Since that announcement, the government backed militia have carried out heinous attacks and extra judicial killings in many Fulani communities. On the other hand the Fulanis have also carried out a series of attacks against communities in Benue which is being described as a massacre. The federal government should therefore hold the state government accountable for directly aiding and abating criminals who are committing atrocities as well as the conspiracy of silence over ongoing attacks in the North Central region. The continued injustice and selective reportage of the crisis will continue fuelling the violence if something is not urgently done about. Authorities must ensure protection for all communities, prosecute known attackers, whether Fulani bandits, from the government backed militia and foster dialogue aimed at ending the cycle of vengeance and bloodshed. Until justice is seen to be done, the violence in the region will continue to escalate under the weight of silence and neglect.

Zagazola

53,509 次观看 • 8 个月前

Don't be surprised that Russia uses international cinema fest to push narratives in favour of Russian genocidal war in Ukraine with propaganda film "Russians At War". We already seen these tries earlier. A terrible and despicable example of how the Western journalist Sean Langan used his story about the Russian war in Ukraine, filmed in the occupied part of Ukraine together with the Russian military, to promote Russian propaganda narratives, cynically covering himself with the slogan "all sides are entitled to their opinion". 1) 5:20 An attempt to emphasize that the local military separatist in this Russian war "protects the family and children", and is not part of the Russian proxy army in the war launched by Russia in Ukraine in 2014. 2) 6:34 An attempt to cast doubt on the DOCUMENTED crimes of the Russian military in Bucha by asking the Russian military "if they are really committed war crimes there." Will any criminal answer such a question honestly? 3) 11:12 In a conversation with a Russian soldier with the call sign "VAL", an attempt is made to show that the Russian soldiers are tired of the war and want it to end. But not a word how they see this "end". 4) 14:25 An attempt to evoke sympathy for a young guy, an army contractor, to whom, on the one hand, he tells with a smile about the war in Ukraine, and then makes a tragic face when talking about the death of his friends in the war, but he has no sympathy for the Ukrainians whom he attacked 5) 17:10 A local military man is shown again, promoting narratives in Russian about "State armed rebellion in Kyiv, which was carried out by the Americans!" 6) 18:30 A Russian military man is shown promoting the narrative "Ukrainians throw away Western weapons when retreating." In fact, you can see in the video that these are FIRED (used) disposable cartridges from anti-tank weapons, which are no longer weapons. 7) 20:10 The Russian military is constantly given the opportunity to promote the narrative in interviews about "Russians never want war. Russia never attacks, only ends wars. Ukrainians are also called "fascists". 8) 23:05 By showing a video of soldiers on the phone with their wives and children, the journalist allows the Russian occupier to promote the narrative "we are here fighting for our families and children", instead of emphasizing that these soldiers are from the country of the aggressor, who came to kill people in a foreign country and seize territory. This is a frank attempt to "humanize" the occupiers. 9) 23:28 The journalist leaves without comment the statement of the military that "for them, the holiday is a victory." What is the victory? In what form? In the destruction of all Ukrainians and capture of Ukraine? 10) 25:12 Under tragic music, without commentary, shows a dead civilian in a car in occupied Donetsk, without commenting behind the scenes that the Russian military most often uses residential areas of Donetsk for shelling of the Ukrainian army, hiding behind local residents and then return fire can kill civilians. 11) 26:24 Enables the Russian occupier to tell that "they are not monsters, but just people who protect their people here and that this is their Motherland and this land is historically theirs." 12) 26:55 The occupier-propagandist is freely allowed to talk about the planned capture of Kyiv and the creation of a Kremlin puppet regime in Ukraine and the transformation of independent Ukraine into a Russian enclave. 13) 27:55 Allows the occupier-propagandist to say, without comment, "that they are simply taking their land and will do so until the last Ukrainian Nazi is killed." And journalist even says "Yes" agreeing with occupier. 14) 30:00 An attempt to show locals suffering from shelling without telling the context of where this shelling came from. 15) 30:50 I show a elderly woman who supports Russia and criticizes Zelensky. It's amazing what people who have been consuming 24/7 Russian propaganda from Russian TV for 9 years can say? 16) 41:40 The journalist asks the Russian occupiers "Do they feel that the world and the West do not understand them?". To which the occupier replies "Of course. If they (the West) understood, EVERYTHING would have ended a long time ago" (referring to the suspension of aid to Ukraine and the capture of Ukraine by Russia). Allows the occupier to promote the narrative "We are not invaders, we are just defending our own!" CONCLUSIONS: There is no "other side of the war" in giving a public opportunity to the soldiers of the army of the aggressor country, which attacked a neighboring country with the aim of capturing and turning it into a Russian enclave, the opportunity to publicly express in Russian narratives about "The West does not understand this war", "We here we protect our loved ones and children", "This is Russian historical territory and we will return it all", "We will not seize Kyiv, but simply change the Ukrainian government by force and turn Ukraine into a part of Russia". This is an attempt to "humanize" the military of the aggressor country, including those who committed terrible war crimes in Ukrainian Buchi, which are fully documented and captured on video. It was also frankly manipulative to show a pro-Russian elderly woman in Donetsk without providing the context that almost the entire pro-Ukrainian population (millions from Donbas region) was forced to flee Donetsk occupied by the Russians, and even those who have a pro-Ukrainian opinion and stayed there will never say anything on camera what he really thinks about Russia, because otherwise he will immediately go to prison or be killed altogether. And an important reminder that Russia NEVER allows real journalists into the occupied territories, except for rare exceptions, when the journalists, in a supposedly balanced story, still push underline the narratives that the Russian government needs (as was the case with a recent video from a propagandist from a German channel who went to show " reconstruction of Mariupol by Russia").
5:18

Don't be surprised that Russia uses international cinema fest to push narratives in favour of Russian genocidal war in Ukraine with propaganda film "Russians At War". We already seen these tries earlier. A terrible and despicable example of how the Western journalist Sean Langan used his story about the Russian war in Ukraine, filmed in the occupied part of Ukraine together with the Russian military, to promote Russian propaganda narratives, cynically covering himself with the slogan "all sides are entitled to their opinion". 1) 5:20 An attempt to emphasize that the local military separatist in this Russian war "protects the family and children", and is not part of the Russian proxy army in the war launched by Russia in Ukraine in 2014. 2) 6:34 An attempt to cast doubt on the DOCUMENTED crimes of the Russian military in Bucha by asking the Russian military "if they are really committed war crimes there." Will any criminal answer such a question honestly? 3) 11:12 In a conversation with a Russian soldier with the call sign "VAL", an attempt is made to show that the Russian soldiers are tired of the war and want it to end. But not a word how they see this "end". 4) 14:25 An attempt to evoke sympathy for a young guy, an army contractor, to whom, on the one hand, he tells with a smile about the war in Ukraine, and then makes a tragic face when talking about the death of his friends in the war, but he has no sympathy for the Ukrainians whom he attacked 5) 17:10 A local military man is shown again, promoting narratives in Russian about "State armed rebellion in Kyiv, which was carried out by the Americans!" 6) 18:30 A Russian military man is shown promoting the narrative "Ukrainians throw away Western weapons when retreating." In fact, you can see in the video that these are FIRED (used) disposable cartridges from anti-tank weapons, which are no longer weapons. 7) 20:10 The Russian military is constantly given the opportunity to promote the narrative in interviews about "Russians never want war. Russia never attacks, only ends wars. Ukrainians are also called "fascists". 8) 23:05 By showing a video of soldiers on the phone with their wives and children, the journalist allows the Russian occupier to promote the narrative "we are here fighting for our families and children", instead of emphasizing that these soldiers are from the country of the aggressor, who came to kill people in a foreign country and seize territory. This is a frank attempt to "humanize" the occupiers. 9) 23:28 The journalist leaves without comment the statement of the military that "for them, the holiday is a victory." What is the victory? In what form? In the destruction of all Ukrainians and capture of Ukraine? 10) 25:12 Under tragic music, without commentary, shows a dead civilian in a car in occupied Donetsk, without commenting behind the scenes that the Russian military most often uses residential areas of Donetsk for shelling of the Ukrainian army, hiding behind local residents and then return fire can kill civilians. 11) 26:24 Enables the Russian occupier to tell that "they are not monsters, but just people who protect their people here and that this is their Motherland and this land is historically theirs." 12) 26:55 The occupier-propagandist is freely allowed to talk about the planned capture of Kyiv and the creation of a Kremlin puppet regime in Ukraine and the transformation of independent Ukraine into a Russian enclave. 13) 27:55 Allows the occupier-propagandist to say, without comment, "that they are simply taking their land and will do so until the last Ukrainian Nazi is killed." And journalist even says "Yes" agreeing with occupier. 14) 30:00 An attempt to show locals suffering from shelling without telling the context of where this shelling came from. 15) 30:50 I show a elderly woman who supports Russia and criticizes Zelensky. It's amazing what people who have been consuming 24/7 Russian propaganda from Russian TV for 9 years can say? 16) 41:40 The journalist asks the Russian occupiers "Do they feel that the world and the West do not understand them?". To which the occupier replies "Of course. If they (the West) understood, EVERYTHING would have ended a long time ago" (referring to the suspension of aid to Ukraine and the capture of Ukraine by Russia). Allows the occupier to promote the narrative "We are not invaders, we are just defending our own!" CONCLUSIONS: There is no "other side of the war" in giving a public opportunity to the soldiers of the army of the aggressor country, which attacked a neighboring country with the aim of capturing and turning it into a Russian enclave, the opportunity to publicly express in Russian narratives about "The West does not understand this war", "We here we protect our loved ones and children", "This is Russian historical territory and we will return it all", "We will not seize Kyiv, but simply change the Ukrainian government by force and turn Ukraine into a part of Russia". This is an attempt to "humanize" the military of the aggressor country, including those who committed terrible war crimes in Ukrainian Buchi, which are fully documented and captured on video. It was also frankly manipulative to show a pro-Russian elderly woman in Donetsk without providing the context that almost the entire pro-Ukrainian population (millions from Donbas region) was forced to flee Donetsk occupied by the Russians, and even those who have a pro-Ukrainian opinion and stayed there will never say anything on camera what he really thinks about Russia, because otherwise he will immediately go to prison or be killed altogether. And an important reminder that Russia NEVER allows real journalists into the occupied territories, except for rare exceptions, when the journalists, in a supposedly balanced story, still push underline the narratives that the Russian government needs (as was the case with a recent video from a propagandist from a German channel who went to show " reconstruction of Mariupol by Russia").

Maksym Borodin

102,361 次观看 • 1 年前

There’s one moment in the debate between Dave Smith and Douglas Murray on Joe Rogan’s podcast that I just have to pause on—because it perfectly distills the heart of the matter. They’re discussing the so-called “blockade” on Gaza, which Dave claims has been in place since 2007. (Side note: Dave frames the disengagement as a move to kill the peace process. But what process was left to kill? The Palestinians had already walked away from it years before) Now, when someone whose entire understanding comes from Wikipedia and self-appointed expert podcasts— someone who’s never actually seen the region with their own eyes or even come close enough to talk to people who live there— hears the word “blockade,” they imagine some medieval-style siege. A small city, completely cut off, with people rotting in sewage, starving, and dying of disease. It’s the kind of imagery that gave rise to the entire mythology of Gaza as an “open-air prison,” and eventually even the obscene comparisons to a “concentration camp.” A modern-day blood libel. Of course, the side under this “blockade” actively promotes that view through its propaganda. They know that people like Dave Smith will keep repeating it, building entire narratives and views around it, because it drives traffic and earns them platforms. And so, the false narrative continues to echo. Then comes Douglas Murray, and he asks the two questions Dave can’t really answer: 1. Have you ever actually gone and seen the situation for yourself? Do you really understand what the word “blockade” means in this context? 2. Why is there a blockade in the first place? (Because while Dave talks about the result, Douglas focuses on the cause.) To both questions, Dave essentially has no real answer. Douglas, of course, does. That’s the difference between someone who knows something and someone who thinks they know enough to speak on it. Dave’s best comeback? “So we’re not allowed to talk about places we haven’t been to?” Of course you can talk. The question is: should anyone who talks automatically get a platform to broadcast their opinions—opinions based on cherry-picked quotes and zero formal education or firsthand experience—to millions around the world? So, for Dave Smith—the ultimate useful idiot, always ready to embrace narratives designed to manipulate and weaponize him—I’ll leave a thread in the comments. It’s one I wrote a while back, showing what Gaza could have been: the trade deals, the billions in international aid, the port and airport they could have had… and what Hamas ultimately chose to do instead. Maybe then Dave will stop just quoting other people (which, to be fair, he does impressively—his memory is sharp!) and start thinking for himself about what caused what. It’s easy to quote, harder to question. And almost impossible to admit you might have built your worldview on someone else’s script.
5:04

There’s one moment in the debate between Dave Smith and Douglas Murray on Joe Rogan’s podcast that I just have to pause on—because it perfectly distills the heart of the matter. They’re discussing the so-called “blockade” on Gaza, which Dave claims has been in place since 2007. (Side note: Dave frames the disengagement as a move to kill the peace process. But what process was left to kill? The Palestinians had already walked away from it years before) Now, when someone whose entire understanding comes from Wikipedia and self-appointed expert podcasts— someone who’s never actually seen the region with their own eyes or even come close enough to talk to people who live there— hears the word “blockade,” they imagine some medieval-style siege. A small city, completely cut off, with people rotting in sewage, starving, and dying of disease. It’s the kind of imagery that gave rise to the entire mythology of Gaza as an “open-air prison,” and eventually even the obscene comparisons to a “concentration camp.” A modern-day blood libel. Of course, the side under this “blockade” actively promotes that view through its propaganda. They know that people like Dave Smith will keep repeating it, building entire narratives and views around it, because it drives traffic and earns them platforms. And so, the false narrative continues to echo. Then comes Douglas Murray, and he asks the two questions Dave can’t really answer: 1. Have you ever actually gone and seen the situation for yourself? Do you really understand what the word “blockade” means in this context? 2. Why is there a blockade in the first place? (Because while Dave talks about the result, Douglas focuses on the cause.) To both questions, Dave essentially has no real answer. Douglas, of course, does. That’s the difference between someone who knows something and someone who thinks they know enough to speak on it. Dave’s best comeback? “So we’re not allowed to talk about places we haven’t been to?” Of course you can talk. The question is: should anyone who talks automatically get a platform to broadcast their opinions—opinions based on cherry-picked quotes and zero formal education or firsthand experience—to millions around the world? So, for Dave Smith—the ultimate useful idiot, always ready to embrace narratives designed to manipulate and weaponize him—I’ll leave a thread in the comments. It’s one I wrote a while back, showing what Gaza could have been: the trade deals, the billions in international aid, the port and airport they could have had… and what Hamas ultimately chose to do instead. Maybe then Dave will stop just quoting other people (which, to be fair, he does impressively—his memory is sharp!) and start thinking for himself about what caused what. It’s easy to quote, harder to question. And almost impossible to admit you might have built your worldview on someone else’s script.

Oren Barsky

384,370 次观看 • 1 年前

🛑BAN THE AL-QUDS MARCH🛑 The Imam of Peace and Global Imams Council unequivocally, and POWERFULLY, denounce the Quds March — and demand accountability from governance. "Every year we witness the disgraceful spectacle of the so-called Quds March (this Sunday March 15th). A global propaganda event orchestrated by the IRGC..." "The fact that Toronto, Canada hosts one of the largest Quds March processions in the West, is a stain on the values of a free society." KEY POINTS 🛑 "You will not see this March in nations like the UAE or even Saudi Arabia. Permitting such an event is tantamount to promoting tеrrorism." 🛑 "It is a deliberate platform to promote tеrrorism, incite hatred, and manipulate public opinion. The IRGC uses this March as a tool to whitewash its crimes...and spread extremist narratives into the West." 🛑 "It is led by corrupt clerics — who possess no credible standing in the Islamic seminary in the Muslim world. These so-called religious figures — barely capable of reciting the holy Quran without embarrassing mistakes — hide behind the guise of the clergy to pursue their own political ambitions." 🛑 "Their manipulation of religion is a disgrace to Islam. Instead of promoting peace and unity they exploit the sacred time to spread hate and division." 🛑 "The Quds March is not a reflection of Islamic values. It is an insult to our faith and a gross distortion of the Quran's teachings. 🛑 "Our communities reject extremism and stand for co-existence. Islam commands us to pursue peace and justice." Share this with your MP. Share this everywhere. And if schools and universities really want to educate their students, they should share this throughout the education system too.
5:01

🛑BAN THE AL-QUDS MARCH🛑 The Imam of Peace and Global Imams Council unequivocally, and POWERFULLY, denounce the Quds March — and demand accountability from governance. "Every year we witness the disgraceful spectacle of the so-called Quds March (this Sunday March 15th). A global propaganda event orchestrated by the IRGC..." "The fact that Toronto, Canada hosts one of the largest Quds March processions in the West, is a stain on the values of a free society." KEY POINTS 🛑 "You will not see this March in nations like the UAE or even Saudi Arabia. Permitting such an event is tantamount to promoting tеrrorism." 🛑 "It is a deliberate platform to promote tеrrorism, incite hatred, and manipulate public opinion. The IRGC uses this March as a tool to whitewash its crimes...and spread extremist narratives into the West." 🛑 "It is led by corrupt clerics — who possess no credible standing in the Islamic seminary in the Muslim world. These so-called religious figures — barely capable of reciting the holy Quran without embarrassing mistakes — hide behind the guise of the clergy to pursue their own political ambitions." 🛑 "Their manipulation of religion is a disgrace to Islam. Instead of promoting peace and unity they exploit the sacred time to spread hate and division." 🛑 "The Quds March is not a reflection of Islamic values. It is an insult to our faith and a gross distortion of the Quran's teachings. 🛑 "Our communities reject extremism and stand for co-existence. Islam commands us to pursue peace and justice." Share this with your MP. Share this everywhere. And if schools and universities really want to educate their students, they should share this throughout the education system too.

dahlia kurtz ✡︎ דליה קורץ

15,490 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 lf you ever want to get RTE or any other Fake News Scum Media to leave in a hurry ask them one simple question "WHY DON'T YOU REPORT ON THE MISSING CHILDREN"? 🇮🇪 2 anti Irish parasitic vampires - Barry O' Kelly( Denies the Tusla report & seems to have a maniacal smirk when asked about missing & raped children in state care? These creatures have no soul) ran from Ballyogan & some other Weasley looking snake ran from Coolock last Friday going around with his mic held down trying to pick up conversations unbeknown to the locals 🇮🇪 Overpaid complicit gas lighting vermin. Thank God Legacy Media is on its last legs. It will be a monumental day for éiRe when it draws its final breath & all of these absolute monsters are brought to justice & stripped of all their Ill gotten gains & assets & they are redistributed to all the families they helped destroy with their disgusting fearmongering & their evil & destructive lies 💉 🇮🇪 The revolution will be televised - WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW and it kills you because nobody is buying the poison & Bullshit you're peddling anymore (A short video I did scanning the crowd in Coolock last Fri is on over 251k views -We are getting traction because There is a real hunger for the truth) 🇮🇪 But the Irish people will never see a truthful world through the tainted lens of a bought & paid for whore media who have sold their decrepit souls for monetary gain. To push one sided Government narratives & Globalist agendas that seek to destroy us as a people & a Nation 🇮🇪 Weak, compliant, corrupted, Sub serviant & sub human filth with not a backbone or an ounce of courage, dignity or morals between them. May God forgive you because the Irish people who you have wronged on behalf of a treasonous unwanted Government certainly will not 🇮🇪 "I was just doing my job" Didn't work in Nuremberg & it certainly won't work this time around for everyone of you who have committed such heinous crimes against the humanity of éiRe 🇮🇪 Covering up migrant crime & the shocking excess mortality from the poison 💉 that you also helped to push for your satanic paymasters 🇮🇪 A Government that can bail out a cess pit of an organisation like RTE to the tune of 750 million even after all the recent scandals & that can spend & Send billions to foreign countries - The people of Ireland are being Taxed into oblivion & seeing nothing put back into our working class communities that are left to rot & decay 🇮🇪 You will all be judged in this life & the next for you have the blood of countless on your Greedy Hands 🇮🇪 Anyone got any updates on that poor Irish man who was the latest victim of unprecedented knife crime through open borders yesterday please let me know 🙏🇮🇪 Credit The Irish Zone 🇮🇪 🦌 🤝🇮🇪 God Bless 🙏 éiRe Go Bragh 🇮🇪 #DefundAllFakeNewsMediaScum 🇮🇪
1:15

🚨 lf you ever want to get RTE or any other Fake News Scum Media to leave in a hurry ask them one simple question "WHY DON'T YOU REPORT ON THE MISSING CHILDREN"? 🇮🇪 2 anti Irish parasitic vampires - Barry O' Kelly( Denies the Tusla report & seems to have a maniacal smirk when asked about missing & raped children in state care? These creatures have no soul) ran from Ballyogan & some other Weasley looking snake ran from Coolock last Friday going around with his mic held down trying to pick up conversations unbeknown to the locals 🇮🇪 Overpaid complicit gas lighting vermin. Thank God Legacy Media is on its last legs. It will be a monumental day for éiRe when it draws its final breath & all of these absolute monsters are brought to justice & stripped of all their Ill gotten gains & assets & they are redistributed to all the families they helped destroy with their disgusting fearmongering & their evil & destructive lies 💉 🇮🇪 The revolution will be televised - WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW and it kills you because nobody is buying the poison & Bullshit you're peddling anymore (A short video I did scanning the crowd in Coolock last Fri is on over 251k views -We are getting traction because There is a real hunger for the truth) 🇮🇪 But the Irish people will never see a truthful world through the tainted lens of a bought & paid for whore media who have sold their decrepit souls for monetary gain. To push one sided Government narratives & Globalist agendas that seek to destroy us as a people & a Nation 🇮🇪 Weak, compliant, corrupted, Sub serviant & sub human filth with not a backbone or an ounce of courage, dignity or morals between them. May God forgive you because the Irish people who you have wronged on behalf of a treasonous unwanted Government certainly will not 🇮🇪 "I was just doing my job" Didn't work in Nuremberg & it certainly won't work this time around for everyone of you who have committed such heinous crimes against the humanity of éiRe 🇮🇪 Covering up migrant crime & the shocking excess mortality from the poison 💉 that you also helped to push for your satanic paymasters 🇮🇪 A Government that can bail out a cess pit of an organisation like RTE to the tune of 750 million even after all the recent scandals & that can spend & Send billions to foreign countries - The people of Ireland are being Taxed into oblivion & seeing nothing put back into our working class communities that are left to rot & decay 🇮🇪 You will all be judged in this life & the next for you have the blood of countless on your Greedy Hands 🇮🇪 Anyone got any updates on that poor Irish man who was the latest victim of unprecedented knife crime through open borders yesterday please let me know 🙏🇮🇪 Credit The Irish Zone 🇮🇪 🦌 🤝🇮🇪 God Bless 🙏 éiRe Go Bragh 🇮🇪 #DefundAllFakeNewsMediaScum 🇮🇪

Fergus (Ferg) Power

130,428 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨WATCH THIS. SOUND ON🔉 2yrs, 7 drafts & 125,000 words later, The Bushido of Bitcoin is finally available for pre-order. Writing this book has been a journey, and the process literally transformed my understanding of the world. This is NOT another history of money or economic justification for Bitcoin. Been there, done that. This is a book about virtue, excellence, culture and behaviour, which asks the harder questions: What becomes of those who rise to the top, in the new socio-economic paradigm? Will they become: --> A new kind of parasite? --> Another bunch of degenerate? Or --> Men & women of virtue. It’s not enough to just say “Bitcoin Fixes This.” We must do something about it. ____________________ The age of fiat will not last. A new era will take its place. The question is, who will lay claim to it? IMO: those who understand, that a new age, demands a new way of being. A new paradigm requires a new code, (a Bushido), that’s more vital, powerful and ascendant. The Bushido of Bitcoin is that playbook. ____________________ This is my attempt to synthesise the best of what I’ve found in both the dissident grass-roots right and philosophy-centric bitcoin domain. Some of you may be familiar with each other, but many of you will not. I hope this opens some doors and helps form a powerful alliance against the goblins and trolls running the world today. ____________________ I'd like to thank a few people who helped and/or inspired me along the way. (This is a good follow list, so take note) John Carter - the best editor and intellectual sparring partner I could’ve asked for. Also one of the best writers you'll come across. The book is not only twice as long but 10x better since you got involved and pushed me. Thankyou. Ross Stevens - Thankyou for your support, for agreeing to write the foreword and most importantly, for being a modern day Cosimo de Medici. You are a true Renaissance man. Saifedean Ammous - your work and integrity continue to inspire. You are of the rare few Austrians on earth today with the courage and fortitude to blaze a new trail. Uberboyo - your holistic view of the world and profound takes on Neech, Jung & the vital European soul were inspiring along the way. Jash Dholani - you revealed new rabbit holes for me to venture down with your brilliant coverage and ability to extract wisdom from the old books. You are quoted throughout. Chad Crowley - your eloquent micro-essays on X inspired a number of sections in the book, particular in relation to Nietzsche’s work. You have an understanding of him that few others can match. Jerr - your work on manhood, frame and masculine psychology is the very best in the world & you are quoted throughout. John Vallis & Robert ₿reedlove - our conversations over the years helped me synthesise & sharpen many of the ideas contained within. Parker Lewis & allen farrington - your work on Bitcoin is the only work I reference and point people to if they want the economic argument for Bitcoin. There are of course many others. Finally - a shout out to H E L I Λ И D 🦅 . Working with you on this trailer was a blast. You are a true magician. Reach out to this man if you want the best in video work. And shoutout to DOS BRAINS for the music. Incredibly powerful, and I hope this trailer has done you justice. ____________________ You can pre-order the book NOW on Geyser ⚡️ - along with some limited edition variants that once sold out, are sold out forever.
2:42

🚨WATCH THIS. SOUND ON🔉 2yrs, 7 drafts & 125,000 words later, The Bushido of Bitcoin is finally available for pre-order. Writing this book has been a journey, and the process literally transformed my understanding of the world. This is NOT another history of money or economic justification for Bitcoin. Been there, done that. This is a book about virtue, excellence, culture and behaviour, which asks the harder questions: What becomes of those who rise to the top, in the new socio-economic paradigm? Will they become: --> A new kind of parasite? --> Another bunch of degenerate? Or --> Men & women of virtue. It’s not enough to just say “Bitcoin Fixes This.” We must do something about it. ____________________ The age of fiat will not last. A new era will take its place. The question is, who will lay claim to it? IMO: those who understand, that a new age, demands a new way of being. A new paradigm requires a new code, (a Bushido), that’s more vital, powerful and ascendant. The Bushido of Bitcoin is that playbook. ____________________ This is my attempt to synthesise the best of what I’ve found in both the dissident grass-roots right and philosophy-centric bitcoin domain. Some of you may be familiar with each other, but many of you will not. I hope this opens some doors and helps form a powerful alliance against the goblins and trolls running the world today. ____________________ I'd like to thank a few people who helped and/or inspired me along the way. (This is a good follow list, so take note) John Carter - the best editor and intellectual sparring partner I could’ve asked for. Also one of the best writers you'll come across. The book is not only twice as long but 10x better since you got involved and pushed me. Thankyou. Ross Stevens - Thankyou for your support, for agreeing to write the foreword and most importantly, for being a modern day Cosimo de Medici. You are a true Renaissance man. Saifedean Ammous - your work and integrity continue to inspire. You are of the rare few Austrians on earth today with the courage and fortitude to blaze a new trail. Uberboyo - your holistic view of the world and profound takes on Neech, Jung & the vital European soul were inspiring along the way. Jash Dholani - you revealed new rabbit holes for me to venture down with your brilliant coverage and ability to extract wisdom from the old books. You are quoted throughout. Chad Crowley - your eloquent micro-essays on X inspired a number of sections in the book, particular in relation to Nietzsche’s work. You have an understanding of him that few others can match. Jerr - your work on manhood, frame and masculine psychology is the very best in the world & you are quoted throughout. John Vallis & Robert ₿reedlove - our conversations over the years helped me synthesise & sharpen many of the ideas contained within. Parker Lewis & allen farrington - your work on Bitcoin is the only work I reference and point people to if they want the economic argument for Bitcoin. There are of course many others. Finally - a shout out to H E L I Λ И D 🦅 . Working with you on this trailer was a blast. You are a true magician. Reach out to this man if you want the best in video work. And shoutout to DOS BRAINS for the music. Incredibly powerful, and I hope this trailer has done you justice. ____________________ You can pre-order the book NOW on Geyser ⚡️ - along with some limited edition variants that once sold out, are sold out forever.

Svetski

282,904 次观看 • 2 年前

MULTI-YEAR DATA STUDY SHOWS DEEP MEDIA BIAS AGAINST CHINA The international media is stunningly biased against China, data from a multi-year study has confirmed. Out of 133 lengthy analyses of China in the Financial Times “Big Read” column over a four-year period, only two articles presented China positively, researchers in Hong Kong and London discovered. Separate studies of the Guardian and the BBC showed that 90% of China stories were negatively framed. In the researched period to July 2021, there were 576 reports on China in the UK Telegraph, of which only 2.5% took a positive stance. . . . . ALMOST NO POSITIVE COVERAGE In general, news media almost never published a positive report about the country, said the analysis of reports in the Telegraph, the Guardian, the BBC, the Financial Times and the Economist. The result was that the public received a misleading image of the country, said the study by Dr Tim Summers, who led the research project involving Hong Kong and UK academic institutions. “The British media texts researched for this paper contain almost no positive coverage of China,” Dr Summers’ paper says. “This will not come as a surprise to many readers.” The bias of western mainstream media’s coverage of China is widely known. But Dr Summers’ team at Hong Kong’s Chinese University and London’s Lau China Institute (part of King’s College) enables a data-based look at the problem. . . . . OVER-POLITICIZATION LENS Bias was not the only problem. The study revealed that western journalists tended to politicize all their coverage of China—even when the topic being covered was not politics. “A political and normative lens is often brought to coverage of social, economic and cultural issues”, researchers said. Reporters put everything through their hostile western lens to “reinforce a monochrome, reductionist and negative picture of the country and its politics,” Dr Summers said. . . . . THE ECONOMIST SCORES ZERO The Economist covers China with a weekly column called “Chaguan” written by David Rennie, which constantly recycles the same words over and over to paint whatever China does as “bullying” and “threatening”, the research showed. There was not the slightest attempt at fairness. Analysis showed his columns were mostly clearly negative, with a small number being mixed. The data indicated that not a single one was classified as clearly positive. . . . . HONG KONG AND XINJIANG The research showed that the names of two locations, Hong Kong and Xinjiang, were thrown into articles almost randomly as keywords for repression. “They are frequently mentioned in passing in reports on topics that are not related to either place, in a way that frames China negatively: a template to plug into any story that needs evidence for Chinese ‘repression’, even if that story does not relate either to Hong Kong or Xinjiang,” the study said. . . . . HARMFUL TO CHINESE PEOPLE Interestingly, some reporters seemed to know this position was harmful to China and its people. The report quotes John Sudworth, the BBC correspondent notorious for his hostile attitude to China, and associated with the now-debunked “Uyghur genocide” narrative. Sudworth admitted in an interview that he focused only on the negative, and knew that doing that was problematic. He said: “Obviously there is a danger that that becomes shorthand not just for the Chinese Government and the Chinese system but for the sort of place China is and for its people in general, and I can really see the danger in this.” It’s fascinating that he knew how harmful this was, but it never stopped him and his BBC colleagues giving the world a totally misleading image of China—which the BBC continues to do on a daily basis. China correspondents defend themselves by saying that they are not down on the Chinese people, but just hate the Chinese government. Analysis of their writings indicated that wasn’t true, the research showed. . . . . PROF BELL: ‘EVIL GOVERNMENT’ The negative narrative is so solid in western media that other views cannot be put forward, said Professor Daniel Bell, quoted in the study. “There is almost universal consensus in the West that China is led by an evil government that is bad to its own people and dangerous to people in other countries. It’s extremely difficult to publish views that argue otherwise.” How to get the truth out? You can’t. The western media is so united on this narrative, that they have turned public opinion in western countries against China. Professor Bell added: “Public opinion makes it almost impossible to publish comments that offer a balanced picture of Chinese politics in leading Western media outlets.” Dr Summers ends his report with a recommendation. “To achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of China, alternative sources of information should be actively explored, and those with different opinions encouraged to contribute to the policy debate.”
5:32

MULTI-YEAR DATA STUDY SHOWS DEEP MEDIA BIAS AGAINST CHINA The international media is stunningly biased against China, data from a multi-year study has confirmed. Out of 133 lengthy analyses of China in the Financial Times “Big Read” column over a four-year period, only two articles presented China positively, researchers in Hong Kong and London discovered. Separate studies of the Guardian and the BBC showed that 90% of China stories were negatively framed. In the researched period to July 2021, there were 576 reports on China in the UK Telegraph, of which only 2.5% took a positive stance. . . . . ALMOST NO POSITIVE COVERAGE In general, news media almost never published a positive report about the country, said the analysis of reports in the Telegraph, the Guardian, the BBC, the Financial Times and the Economist. The result was that the public received a misleading image of the country, said the study by Dr Tim Summers, who led the research project involving Hong Kong and UK academic institutions. “The British media texts researched for this paper contain almost no positive coverage of China,” Dr Summers’ paper says. “This will not come as a surprise to many readers.” The bias of western mainstream media’s coverage of China is widely known. But Dr Summers’ team at Hong Kong’s Chinese University and London’s Lau China Institute (part of King’s College) enables a data-based look at the problem. . . . . OVER-POLITICIZATION LENS Bias was not the only problem. The study revealed that western journalists tended to politicize all their coverage of China—even when the topic being covered was not politics. “A political and normative lens is often brought to coverage of social, economic and cultural issues”, researchers said. Reporters put everything through their hostile western lens to “reinforce a monochrome, reductionist and negative picture of the country and its politics,” Dr Summers said. . . . . THE ECONOMIST SCORES ZERO The Economist covers China with a weekly column called “Chaguan” written by David Rennie, which constantly recycles the same words over and over to paint whatever China does as “bullying” and “threatening”, the research showed. There was not the slightest attempt at fairness. Analysis showed his columns were mostly clearly negative, with a small number being mixed. The data indicated that not a single one was classified as clearly positive. . . . . HONG KONG AND XINJIANG The research showed that the names of two locations, Hong Kong and Xinjiang, were thrown into articles almost randomly as keywords for repression. “They are frequently mentioned in passing in reports on topics that are not related to either place, in a way that frames China negatively: a template to plug into any story that needs evidence for Chinese ‘repression’, even if that story does not relate either to Hong Kong or Xinjiang,” the study said. . . . . HARMFUL TO CHINESE PEOPLE Interestingly, some reporters seemed to know this position was harmful to China and its people. The report quotes John Sudworth, the BBC correspondent notorious for his hostile attitude to China, and associated with the now-debunked “Uyghur genocide” narrative. Sudworth admitted in an interview that he focused only on the negative, and knew that doing that was problematic. He said: “Obviously there is a danger that that becomes shorthand not just for the Chinese Government and the Chinese system but for the sort of place China is and for its people in general, and I can really see the danger in this.” It’s fascinating that he knew how harmful this was, but it never stopped him and his BBC colleagues giving the world a totally misleading image of China—which the BBC continues to do on a daily basis. China correspondents defend themselves by saying that they are not down on the Chinese people, but just hate the Chinese government. Analysis of their writings indicated that wasn’t true, the research showed. . . . . PROF BELL: ‘EVIL GOVERNMENT’ The negative narrative is so solid in western media that other views cannot be put forward, said Professor Daniel Bell, quoted in the study. “There is almost universal consensus in the West that China is led by an evil government that is bad to its own people and dangerous to people in other countries. It’s extremely difficult to publish views that argue otherwise.” How to get the truth out? You can’t. The western media is so united on this narrative, that they have turned public opinion in western countries against China. Professor Bell added: “Public opinion makes it almost impossible to publish comments that offer a balanced picture of Chinese politics in leading Western media outlets.” Dr Summers ends his report with a recommendation. “To achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of China, alternative sources of information should be actively explored, and those with different opinions encouraged to contribute to the policy debate.”

Nury Vittachi

98,429 次观看 • 2 年前

"If you want war, you will get war. If you want to destroy China, you will be destroyed. China will not fire the first shot, but China will not allow you to fire the second shot." In the realm of global geopolitics, Victor Gao, a prominent Chinese geopolitical analyst and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping, has emerged as a vocal advocate for China's principled stance on international relations. His recent statement encapsulates China's resolute commitment to peace while underscoring its unyielding resolve to defend sovereignty and national interests. This declaration, shared widely across platforms, reflects China's defensive posture amid escalating tensions with the United States, particularly over issues like trade, technology, and regional security. Belligerence, NO! Gao's words stem from a deep understanding of China's historical trajectory. Since the reform and opening-up era initiated by Deng in 1978, China has achieved unprecedented economic miracles without resorting to military aggression or colonial exploitation. Today, it stands as the world's largest economy by purchasing power parity, producing over 45% of global industrial goods, and leading in infrastructure like high-speed rail networks that connect nations and foster prosperity. This peaceful rise has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty, demonstrating China's model of "win-win" cooperation through initiatives like the Belt & Road, which enhance global connectivity & economic interdependence. In contrast to Western narratives of hegemony, China adheres to Deng's pledge: it will never seek to dominate others, nor tolerate domination itself. He addresses perceived US provocations, including tariffs, technology bans, and military encirclements in the Asia-Pacific. Gao warns that attempts at "decoupling" from China are not only futile but catastrophic, as they sever vital supply chains—such as rare earth elements critical for US defense—and risk plunging humanity into conflict. He critiques US overreach, citing trillions wasted on wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, and ongoing support for conflicts like those in Gaza, which he labels as "crimes against humanity." Such actions, Gao argues, accelerate American decline while China focuses on building—generating 250% more electricity than the US and outpacing it in industrial output. China's military advancements, including superiority in conventional and nuclear capabilities in certain domains, serve purely for defense, ensuring no aggressor can threaten its core interests without facing overwhelming retaliation. Yet, China's approach remains fundamentally peaceful. It has not fired a shot in foreign wars for decades, advocating for dialogue, free trade & mutual respect. Gao emphasizes that true security comes from collaboration, not confrontation: "There will be no fair trade without free trade." He invites the US to partner in reindustrialization, offering expertise to revive American manufacturing jobs, provided infrastructure upgrades occur. This olive branch highlights China's maturity—willing to engage as equals, not adversaries. In essence, Gao's warning is a call for wisdom. Provoking China invites mutual destruction in an interconnected "global village," where war benefits no one. Instead, embracing China's vision of shared prosperity could avert disaster. By championing justice—such as the 2-state solution for Palestine & UN membership for all nations—China models ethical leadership. Its restraint in not initiating conflict, paired with unbreakable defense, ensures stability for the Global South & beyond. As Gao asserts, peace is inevitable if misunderstandings are bridged through respect. China's story is one of resilience & benevolence, proving that true power lies in uplifting humanity, not subjugating it. In a world teetering on brinkmanship, China's stance offers hope: development over devastation, harmony over hostility. China is indeed the 21st Century World Superpower
1:01

"If you want war, you will get war. If you want to destroy China, you will be destroyed. China will not fire the first shot, but China will not allow you to fire the second shot." In the realm of global geopolitics, Victor Gao, a prominent Chinese geopolitical analyst and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping, has emerged as a vocal advocate for China's principled stance on international relations. His recent statement encapsulates China's resolute commitment to peace while underscoring its unyielding resolve to defend sovereignty and national interests. This declaration, shared widely across platforms, reflects China's defensive posture amid escalating tensions with the United States, particularly over issues like trade, technology, and regional security. Belligerence, NO! Gao's words stem from a deep understanding of China's historical trajectory. Since the reform and opening-up era initiated by Deng in 1978, China has achieved unprecedented economic miracles without resorting to military aggression or colonial exploitation. Today, it stands as the world's largest economy by purchasing power parity, producing over 45% of global industrial goods, and leading in infrastructure like high-speed rail networks that connect nations and foster prosperity. This peaceful rise has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty, demonstrating China's model of "win-win" cooperation through initiatives like the Belt & Road, which enhance global connectivity & economic interdependence. In contrast to Western narratives of hegemony, China adheres to Deng's pledge: it will never seek to dominate others, nor tolerate domination itself. He addresses perceived US provocations, including tariffs, technology bans, and military encirclements in the Asia-Pacific. Gao warns that attempts at "decoupling" from China are not only futile but catastrophic, as they sever vital supply chains—such as rare earth elements critical for US defense—and risk plunging humanity into conflict. He critiques US overreach, citing trillions wasted on wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, and ongoing support for conflicts like those in Gaza, which he labels as "crimes against humanity." Such actions, Gao argues, accelerate American decline while China focuses on building—generating 250% more electricity than the US and outpacing it in industrial output. China's military advancements, including superiority in conventional and nuclear capabilities in certain domains, serve purely for defense, ensuring no aggressor can threaten its core interests without facing overwhelming retaliation. Yet, China's approach remains fundamentally peaceful. It has not fired a shot in foreign wars for decades, advocating for dialogue, free trade & mutual respect. Gao emphasizes that true security comes from collaboration, not confrontation: "There will be no fair trade without free trade." He invites the US to partner in reindustrialization, offering expertise to revive American manufacturing jobs, provided infrastructure upgrades occur. This olive branch highlights China's maturity—willing to engage as equals, not adversaries. In essence, Gao's warning is a call for wisdom. Provoking China invites mutual destruction in an interconnected "global village," where war benefits no one. Instead, embracing China's vision of shared prosperity could avert disaster. By championing justice—such as the 2-state solution for Palestine & UN membership for all nations—China models ethical leadership. Its restraint in not initiating conflict, paired with unbreakable defense, ensures stability for the Global South & beyond. As Gao asserts, peace is inevitable if misunderstandings are bridged through respect. China's story is one of resilience & benevolence, proving that true power lies in uplifting humanity, not subjugating it. In a world teetering on brinkmanship, China's stance offers hope: development over devastation, harmony over hostility. China is indeed the 21st Century World Superpower

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇷🇺

22,749 次观看 • 9 个月前

Respecting local queer voices matters: The LGBTQ+ community in Thailand has explicitly stated that corporations should not co-opt or use Pride parades to sell "ships" or promote fictional series. Many LGBTQ+ activists in Thailand have emphasized that Pride is first and foremost a space for queer people, visibility, community, and human rights. Some have also criticized the commercialization of Pride and the use of LGBTQ+ identities purely as a marketing tool, often referred to as “rainbow washing.” Pride should not lose its original purpose in favor of corporate promotion. Celebrating real history, not fictional ships: This year's Bangkok Pride, under the theme "Patch the World with Pride," is deeply significant. It marks over a full year since Thailand legally enacted historic marriage equality, becoming the first country in Southeast Asia to do so. Thousands of real couples have formalised their unions. Pride is about celebrating this monumental human rights victory and building momentum to host WorldPride 2030 in Bangkok. It is not an agency competition or a corporate contest to see who can parade the most actors. When artists attend, many choose to do so privately or are invited individually as genuine advocates, supporting the community in diverse ways throughout the year. Extremely packed summer schedules: June is peak event season in Thailand. Many main couples are completely booked with intense rehearsals for major summer concerts, fan meetings, brand events, filming schedules, and international commitments overlapping. Pride Month in Thailand includes events throughout the entire month of June, not just one parade, and different artists join different activities depending on their availability. Posts like this show exactly why I refuse to follow your page. It is a terrible, out-of-touch take and lazy reporting. Turning Pride into a corporate competition and framing it as "who has the balls" to send couples completely misses the point. As a news page, you have a responsibility to inform, not to inflame and spark drama for engagement. Instead of researching schedule overlaps, cultural context, or listening to what the local Thai LGBTQ+ community actually wants, you choose to publish selective narratives. Not every absence is a scandal. Not every corporate decision is a slight against fans. Pride is a space for human rights, not a fandom battleground. When your coverage prioritizes clicks and fanwars over accuracy, it stops being journalism and becomes the amplification of misinformation. If you want credibility, do the research first, understand the local political significance of Thai Pride, and verify your context. Being first to tweet means nothing if your take is completely wrong.
0:31

Respecting local queer voices matters: The LGBTQ+ community in Thailand has explicitly stated that corporations should not co-opt or use Pride parades to sell "ships" or promote fictional series. Many LGBTQ+ activists in Thailand have emphasized that Pride is first and foremost a space for queer people, visibility, community, and human rights. Some have also criticized the commercialization of Pride and the use of LGBTQ+ identities purely as a marketing tool, often referred to as “rainbow washing.” Pride should not lose its original purpose in favor of corporate promotion. Celebrating real history, not fictional ships: This year's Bangkok Pride, under the theme "Patch the World with Pride," is deeply significant. It marks over a full year since Thailand legally enacted historic marriage equality, becoming the first country in Southeast Asia to do so. Thousands of real couples have formalised their unions. Pride is about celebrating this monumental human rights victory and building momentum to host WorldPride 2030 in Bangkok. It is not an agency competition or a corporate contest to see who can parade the most actors. When artists attend, many choose to do so privately or are invited individually as genuine advocates, supporting the community in diverse ways throughout the year. Extremely packed summer schedules: June is peak event season in Thailand. Many main couples are completely booked with intense rehearsals for major summer concerts, fan meetings, brand events, filming schedules, and international commitments overlapping. Pride Month in Thailand includes events throughout the entire month of June, not just one parade, and different artists join different activities depending on their availability. Posts like this show exactly why I refuse to follow your page. It is a terrible, out-of-touch take and lazy reporting. Turning Pride into a corporate competition and framing it as "who has the balls" to send couples completely misses the point. As a news page, you have a responsibility to inform, not to inflame and spark drama for engagement. Instead of researching schedule overlaps, cultural context, or listening to what the local Thai LGBTQ+ community actually wants, you choose to publish selective narratives. Not every absence is a scandal. Not every corporate decision is a slight against fans. Pride is a space for human rights, not a fandom battleground. When your coverage prioritizes clicks and fanwars over accuracy, it stops being journalism and becomes the amplification of misinformation. If you want credibility, do the research first, understand the local political significance of Thai Pride, and verify your context. Being first to tweet means nothing if your take is completely wrong.

ɾαɱσɳα ❥･•🖤🤍

44,466 次观看 • 2 个月前