正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Justice Jackson has continually shown that while she says she doesn’t believe in an imperial Executive, she does believe in an imperial Judiciary. Today, I joined America's Newsroom to break down Justice Jackson’s sole dissent in Trump v. AFGE. She has gone too far in this case—even Justice Sotomayor... show more
10 条评论

@mattdizwhitlock @AmericaNewsroom People need to understand: Justice Jackson *does* believe in an imperial presidency -- *if* it's a Democrat. If we had Harris, Jackson's recent opinions would be a lot different. She is the most complete embodiment of the Left's "only results matter, not the law" philosophy.

@AmericaNewsroom When you glance to your right and see Justice Sotomayor there, it's time to consider whether you might have moved too far to the left.

@AmericaNewsroom Justice Jackson has a large group of legal clerks and interns and legal staff. Either she is not taking legal advice from her staff or her staff is selected by her biased reasoning. Their careers are pretty much tainted at this point. Not a good judgeship resume.

@MZHemingway @AmericaNewsroom True. And it's stunning how few citations to law she makes. In this latest awful, lone dissent I count six. Total. And they're all boilerplate recitation of legal standards. She's literally making it all up untethered to any precedent or even the issue before the court

@AmericaNewsroom WORD!

@AmericaNewsroom Justice Jackson should do some U.S. Constitution studying over her summer vacation.

@AmericaNewsroom a textbook DEI pick—and it’s obvious Jackson doesn’t have a clue.

@AmericaNewsroom Drug test that chick!

@AmericaNewsroom So pretty

@MZHemingway @AmericaNewsroom She only believes when a Democrat creates an EO
