Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Justin Trudeau Justin Trudeau is the single most repulsive and destructive figure to ever hold the office of Prime Minister of Canada. This slimy authoritarian fraud weaponized a public health issue to impose savage vaccine mandates that stripped millions of citizens of their jobs their ability to travel and...

36,444 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This painting shows the most heartbreaking reunion in all of literature. To understand it, you have to know who the dog is... His name is Argos, and he belongs to Ulysses, the Greek hero also known as Odysseus. Before Ulysses sailed away to fight in the Trojan War, he had raised Argos from a puppy, a fast and beautiful hunting dog. Then the war called, and Ulysses left. He would not come home for twenty years. When Ulysses finally set foot on his own island again, he came in disguise, dressed as a beggar, so that no one would know him. His house was full of men trying to steal his wife and his kingdom. To survive, he had to remain a stranger in his own home. No one recognized him. Not his loyal servants. Not the people who had known him all his life. But lying in the dirt by the gate, old and forgotten, covered in ticks, too weak to stand, was a dog. Argos had waited twenty years. And the moment he saw him, he knew. He was the only one. Nearly blind, half dead, he lifted his head and pricked up his ears, and he wagged his tail for the master he had never stopped waiting for. Ulysses saw him. And because he was in disguise, surrounded by enemies, he could not run to him, could not kneel down, could not say his name. He could only look at his old friend and, turning his face away so no one would see, let a single tear fall. And then, in Homer's own words, "the dark shadow of death closed down on Argos' eyes, the instant he had seen Odysseus, twenty years away." He had held on to life for one reason only: he was waiting to see him come home. And the moment he did, he could finally let go... It is such a beautiful painting, and the look on that dog's face is so universal, so instantly understood by anyone who has ever loved and waited, that it is enough to bring a grown man to tears.

James Lucas

107,060 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I’ve heard countless tributes to Charlie Kirk, but this sermon from Pastor Rob McCoy stands out as the ultimate testament to the life Charlie lived and the mission God gave him. “I look at Charlie and his life as modern-day Moses.” I strongly urge everyone to watch this full message: "One man in God constitutes a majority, and that's what Charlie was. He understood that God was the majority and he operated in that context. And he continued forward even though it wasn't popular. You'd be with him at some of these campus events. It'd be Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of detractors." "He would just continue by the spoken word. He wasn't a violent man. He built turning point on nothing more than the spoken word, logic and reason, logos. And every day he was threatened by those who couldn't contend logically with the spoken word. And he would step forward without any fear because as the apostle Paul said, I have been crucified with Christ." "It's no longer I who live, it's Christ who lives in me. I is ego, self-preservation, Charlie had given his life to the Lord and it was in his hands and he was going to step forward courageously without fear. Because in the absence of courage, truth is an orphan. And Charlie was fearless, just like you are. And he knew every day with those threats that he was in danger, but his life belonged to God." "Like he would say, I'm immortal until God's done with me. And as he would step forward and contend, he would win hearts. And now it's not, Charlie in a sea of detractors. It was Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of red hats and people professing having come to Christ because of him sharing his faith."

Benny Johnson

245,302 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Gavin Newsom is not a politician; he is a pathological con artist who has turned the governance of California into a personal criminal enterprise so brazen it makes the mob look like amateurs. He is a public menace... The greasy hair, the fake smile that never reaches his dead, soulless eyes, and that smug, voice dripping with condescension. He is the physical embodiment of everything rotting America from within. While he lectures the rest of the nation on morality from his ivory tower, he is actually running a racketeering ring that would make Al Capone blush. He is a parasite of the highest order, feeding on the misery of a state he has systematically destroyed, turning California into a third-world wasteland of tent cities, open-air drug markets, and violent crime, all while he sips million-dollar wine in his Napa Valley estate. He is a fraud, a liar, and a thief, and his entire career is a testament to the fact that the American Left is nothing more than a syndicate of criminals protecting their own. The depth of his corruption is staggering, even by the low standards of modern politics. His former chief of staff, Dana Williamson, a woman he placed in the second-highest position in the state, was recently exposed as a felon who siphoned hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaign funds for personal luxuries. She bought Chanel bags, took private jets, and installed luxury home improvements while claiming it was campaign business. And Newsom wants us to believe he knew nothing? That he was just too busy "governing" to notice his right-hand man running a million-dollar fraud ring out of his office? It is a lie. He either knew and participated, making him a co-conspirator, or he was so incompetent he allowed it to happen, making him unfit for any position of trust. There is no middle ground. He is either a criminal or a fool, and given his track record, he is likely both. He is a man who has built a career on the backs of the vulnerable, using their suffering as a backdrop for his own enrichment. But the rot goes deeper than just his staff; it is embedded in his very DNA and extends directly to his household. Newsom has weaponized his position as Governor to create a pay-to-play scheme that is nothing short of treasonous. Through a loophole known as "behested payments," he has funneled millions of dollars from special interests directly to non-profits run by his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. We are talking about millions from casino operators, utility monopolies, and healthcare giants who are simultaneously lobbying his office for favors. It is a classic extortion racket: give money to the First Family or expect nothing but hostility from the state. They call it charity; it is bribery, plain and simple. They call it philanthropy; it is a laundering scheme designed to hide the fact that he is selling the state of California to the highest bidder. He is a pimp for special interests, selling out the people he swore to protect for a handful of silver. His entire administration is a hive of scum and villainy, a testament to his belief that the law does not apply to him. He appointed Tom Girardi, a known embeeler and predator of the vulnerable, to his judicial selection committee. He placed Melahat Rafiei, a woman convicted of attempting to bribe public officials, on a state board. These are not mistakes; they are features of his regime. He rewards loyalty with public office and punishes dissent with the full force of the state. He is a man who has no regard for the rule of law, no respect for the people of California, and no shame in his relentless pursuit of power and wealth. He is a monster who has destroyed a once-great state, turning it into a nightmare of crime, poverty, and despair, all while he lives like a king. He is the enemy of the people, a traitor to his oath, and a danger to our society. The evidence is overwhelming, the pattern is clear, and the time for accountability is now. Federal investigators are closing in, subpoenas have been served, and the walls of his criminal empire are crumbling. He is scrambling, hiring high-priced lawyers and issuing denials, but the truth is out. He is a fraud, and his entire career is a lie. He is a man who has stolen from the poor to give to the rich, who has sacrificed the safety of children for political gain, and who has betrayed the trust of every single person who ever voted for him. He is a disgrace to humanity, a blight on our nation, and a symbol of everything that is wrong with the modern world. He must be stopped, he must be prosecuted, and he must be put behind bars where he belongs. Let us be clear: Gavin Newsom is not a public servant. He is a public menace. He is a man who has used his position to enrich himself and his family at the expense of the people he was elected to serve. He is a criminal who has evaded justice for too long, but his time is up. The people of California deserve better. The people of America deserve better. We must demand his immediate resignation, his full prosecution, and his permanent removal from public life. He is a cancer on our society, and we must cut him out before he spreads his disease any further. He is a liar, a thief, and a traitor, and he must be held accountable for his crimes. The world is watching. The era of Gavin Newsom is over, and good riddance to him. He is a reminder of what happens when we allow evil to go unchecked, and we must never let it happen again.

Saggezza Eterna

72,199 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Reza Pahlavi, for all intents and purposes, does not owe us anything. His family built Iran from zero. When I say zero, I mean zero. A weak, fragmented Qajar state, one in which women could not leave the house without a man. One in which Iran’s internal affairs were completely controlled by outsiders. One in which foreign armies seized our lands to feed their troops while half our population died of famine. A country without an army, without national infrastructure, without sovereignty over its own resources. And I can go on, and on, and on. In return, we Iranians repaid their blood, sweat, and tears with one of the greatest treacheries imaginable in modern history. His grandfather, arguably one of the greatest men in Iran’s history, his tomb was levelled to the ground. His father was forced to leave the country he loved more than anything in the world. One could say it was not his illness that killed him, but the knife we put in his back, the betrayal of a nation he had dedicated his life to. Reza Pahlavi’s friends and family who remained in Iran were murdered, one by one, at the hands of the regime WE enabled. An entire generation around him was hunted, imprisoned, executed, or driven into exile. His sister and brother, unable to bear the weight of exile and the destruction of everything they had known, took their own lives. Reza Pahlavi has the money. He could have chosen a quiet life, a life of comfort and distance, far from the insults, the threats, the endless character assassination. Instead of spending more than four decades on this path, he could have lived for himself and his family, free of this burden. Instead, he chose responsibility. He chose to stand for the very people who betrayed his family and became the cause of so much suffering in his life. What does he ask in return? Nothing. No throne has been demanded. No position imposed. He has asked only for a national process in which the Iranian people themselves decide their future. He has anchored that path in clear principles, precisely to prevent Iran from falling once again into chaos, fragmentation, and revenge. Yet even for that, he is criticised by so-called “Iran expert” podcasters who have never carried the weight of a nation on their shoulders, who say, “He does not want to lead,” “He is not your guy.” All while he and his family live under constant attacks, threats, and scrutiny on a daily basis. Despite all of that, his love for his people and his land overrides everything. He continues to fight for us. I want to say we have done nothing to deserve it, but the people of Iran have proven otherwise in these past weeks. They are no longer blinded by decades of propaganda. They are revisiting their history. They are correcting the lies they were raised with. They are openly calling his name in the streets, knowing the price that must be paid for it. They are awake to the mistakes of past generations, and they have reached out their hand to him. And he, despite everything, has taken that hand.

Arsalan Naamdar

24,647 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

In 1921, a boy named Abdul was born in Ludhiana, Punjab. His father was a wealthy and powerful landlord, but he wasn't exactly a "family man." He was arrogant, unkind, and had a habit of collecting wives,12 of them, to be exact. Abdul’s mother was wife number eleven, and despite the crowded family tree, Abdul was the only son the man ever had. ​His father didn't care much for love or the women he married, he only cared about having an heir. When Abdul’s mother finally couldn't take his cruelty anymore, she decided to leave. Had she left by herself, he probably wouldn't have blinked, but she took the boy with her. That was a dealbreaker. ​The father threatened to kidnap the child and dragged the whole mess to court. Eventually, the judge looked at young Abdul and asked who he wanted to live with. The boy didn't hesitate - "My Mother." ​From that day on, it was the two of them against the world. She sold her jewelry to pay for his school and keep them afloat. Abdul traded a life of luxury for a life of integrity, and it clearly paid off. He grew up to be one of India’s most famous poets, taking the pen name Sahir and adding Ludhianvi to honor his hometown. ​Even as he became a superstar, his bond with his mother stayed at the center of his life. He looked after her with total devotion, never forgetting that she chose his freedom over her own comfort. ​Sahir was also a bit of a troublemaker for the authorities. He was a vocal communist, and after writing an article that the Pakistani government didn't appreciate in 1949, an arrest warrant was issued. He headed back across the border to the side where he was born and spent the rest of his life using his lyrics to fight for secularism and socialist values. ​He was even the first lyricist to stand up to big music companies and demand royalties. Today, on his birth anniversary, we remember the rebel who turned his struggles into the songs we still hum today. "Kabe me raho ya Kashi me raho..." Movie : Dharmputra

𝓼𝓪𝓷𝓴𝓪𝓻

55,651 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is what real respect for a president looks like. He never needed to cancel comedians or extort media companies, Fortune 500 CEOs or trusted trading partners. He never bent the knee to Vladimir Putin, a convicted war criminal. He never blamed the victim of an illegal invasion for having caused a conflict. He never instigated a federal sales tax on every American calling it a tariff and pretended foreign countries paid the bill. And he certainly did not preside over the biggest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top in American history. He never removed the healthcare and SNAP payments of millions of Americans, while removing consumer and environmental protections against clean air and clean water. He never pretended prices were going down when they were going up. He never threatened to invade Canada, Greenland or Panama. He never setup a crypto bribe pipeline and earned $5 billion in his first 6 months in office, by using the seal of the President to extort those seeking access to favors. He never deployed the military to American cities and condoned the abduction of people by masked men from the streets, and he never deported people to concentration camps. He never defunded universities, scientific research including for childhood cancer and never endangered the lives of children by the integrating conspiracy theories into critical vaccines programs for preventable childhood diseases. He never removed the right to bodily autonomy for women or forced them to risk death to preserve an unviable fetus. Or to face imprisonment for a miscarriage. He never tried to ban access to medicated abortion, or try to limit access to contraception. He never tore up the Rose Garden and paved over it with concrete and cheap looking parasols. He never decorated the Oval Office like a 17th Century French brothel, and he definitely did not sell American citizenship. He never committed crimes against the English language and sentence structure. And was never a laughing stock on the world stage, neither did he travel abroad to lecture world leaders on the free speech he was denying his own citizens. He never gave a speech before a monarch during which people cringed and wanted to crawl into a hole with embarrassment for him. He did however win the heart of Queen Elizabeth II who asked him if he would return to visit after his presidency. He did visit Buckingham Palace three times and the Queen allowed his daughters to sit in the Royal carriage as an enduring sign of her affection for him and his family. He was never a fan of wearing orange face paint or living on Big Macs and full sugar Coca-Cola. Oh and did I mention he didn’t cheat at golf? He never lost a presidential election and won the Nobel Peace prize, as well as numerous international honors, and did speak to a joint gathering of the Lords and the Commons in the historic Westminster hall at the Houses of Parliament. But in the spirit of balance, he DID wear a tan suit! Was guilty of being the most popular president in American history and could speak using full sentences, cadence with oratory dynamics. Oh and he wasn’t obese and in such poor health that he lived with cankles and bruised hands from cannulas. Other than this they are like two peas in a pod 🫛 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

27,266 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Sehun’s past life hypnosis as Seungchul from the Joseon Dynasty! Childhood: Grew up in a wealthy family with a loving mom and a strict scholar dad Teenager: A smart kid who reads + writes well and was very active too but didn’t have any big ambitions In his 20s: Something bad happened to his dad and he was separated from his parents. He gets held captive in prison but was released later on and ends up serving someone of a high position as like a bodyguard since he’s skilled at fighting. He was trusted and recognised as a hard worker by the person whom he served with respect Marriage: Met his beautiful wife who’s from a lower social class while walking and naturally fell in love with her. He lived happily married and was a husband who was full of aegyo towards his wife. He was a good dad to his son and daughter as well In his 40s: A just local magistrate who was harsh to those who did wrong but generous to those in need In his 50s: Reached the most successful point in his life. He valued family the most and his family members were all happy too Elderly: Still in a high position and was someone who was revered by the people. He passed away with his wife next to him but left with no regrets The person from his past life that he wishes to meet in this current life: The person whom he respected The aspect from his past life that he wishes to keep as Sehun: His generosity If he’s given a next life, what he wishes to do the most is to meet the same wife again

언제나세훈이편 ❄️

84,181 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat