Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Kahanism is not “understanding the enemy”, it’s using racially motivated hatred to build state policy and condone the use of force on the basis of race. That’s not how you ensure security and it’s also not how you build a strong sustainable nation. A robust military campaign can never... show more
94,786 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10
You are a blatant liar. Kahane did not base his argument on racial superiority but on the realpolitik that many Arabs and Muslims want only to kill all Jews and certainly eradicate them from Israel -- on the fact that compromise with this enemy is illusory. That is quite hard to argue with.
Your false portrayal of Rabbi Meir Kahane is ridiculous. Unfortunately, Arab Knesset parties are anti Israel and support Hamas.
Emily I read your background. You're seeing this through the lens of a 30 yr. old growing up in LA with limited facts. Many observant Jews feel strongly about protecting the Jewish community & Israel. We had the JDL when I grew up in LA. Everyone's entitled to their opinion.
I live in Haifa, I have Arab neighbours, friends and colleagues. Why will my children have to serve 3 yrs. in the army to protect them, but theirs won't do the same for me? Unless they don't view this country as theirs in the same way I do, if you get what that means.
Bad take. Kahana was right
With all due respect Emily, you don't understand Kahane. I'm a lot older than you, and unlike yourself, I had the honor of interacting with him dozens of times..I saw first hand what a kind humanist that he really was. Like many others, you fall for the misrepresentation that many leftists colored him with. He wasn't a racist,contrary to popular opinion. He didn't hate Arabs, he loved Jews. He understood that Arab pride couldn't be bought with indoor plumbing. He understood survival better than anyone I know, and he knew how to build a sustainable nation better than anyone else.
Guys, calm down. She just wants your racism to be a bit more subtle. Not so much in your face. Liberal PR is needed. Emily is not against the ethnic cleansing. She is a Zionist just like you. Just don’t shout openly racist slogans while doing it.
We can't beat them your way. We tried the left's answer with oslo it failed we tried unilateral withdrawl in gaza we got rockets we tried containing the problem in Yehuda and shomron its not sustainable. KAHANE WAS RIGHT!
I think you’re wrong. I really like you and I appreciate your support of the Jewish people. But I am reading more about Kahane and I think you should too. Not all cultures are equal. Not all peoples are equal.
You’ve been literally defending Kahanism this whole time without realizing it 🤦♂️
![🚨 James Harr of Means Workwear Defends the Assassination of Charlie Kirk In his telling, Charlie Kirk didn’t die because of a deranged assassin, he died because he debated people. “The rhetoric of Charlie Kirk… the debate that Charlie Kirk engaged in… that catalyzed, that bled out into broad political violence. Everything we’re seeing with the Trump regime, ICE, anti-transit, all that, it stems from Charlie Kirk and his ilk. It stems from the political violence of the debate itself.” This is the logic of totalitarianism. Harr insists debate is “inherently violent” and therefore should not exist: “Those debates honestly should not [exist]… To think about Charlie Kirk’s debate world and to think that’s not an inherently violent space… is delusion.” The message here is chilling: if you engage in public debate, you are guilty of “violence,” and if someone kills you, well — you had it coming. This is what passes for “analysis” on the radical left today: not a defense of speech, not a defense of dissent, but a justification for silencing opponents by force. And it’s coming from someone who, on top of it all, hawks Hamas fanboy t-shirts for a living.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1965958516172083698/amplify_video_thumb/1965958317089456128/img/xIqcUD-iXXt4a53L.jpg)
