Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Kaizer Chiefs benefitted, but so did Stellenbosch.

48,546 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

🇿🇦Ntsika's profile picture
🇿🇦Ntsika1 year ago

U forgot this one.

Sterling Terrell's profile picture
Sterling Terrell1 year ago

simple websites for cotton growers & gins

Sphelele's profile picture
Sphelele1 year ago

Chiefs didn’t benefit bafo, there was no foul on sage, ukuwa kwakhe kuqhamuke kwi momentum from jumping and punching the ball, the touch from matlou was almost non existent, we didn’t benefit

Khaya's profile picture
Khaya1 year ago

Chiefs never benefited, it was actually hard done by, all round...

Ntuthuko Hlatshwayo's profile picture
Ntuthuko Hlatshwayo1 year ago

Stop saying Chiefs benefited my brother. That was a clean goal. It’s the poor linesman who messed up

MAGONONDO's profile picture
MAGONONDO1 year ago

NONSENSE. Kaizer chiefs did not benefit at all, that Matlou elbow missed the keeper.

Thubelihle Wisdom Ndabeni's profile picture
Thubelihle Wisdom Ndabeni1 year ago

A push on Matlou, which makes it a foul

tshepo_seladi 🇿🇦's profile picture
tshepo_seladi 🇿🇦1 year ago

I honestly think the keeper was hardly touched and we did not benefit. In fact, Stellies benefited from a penalty and a red card incident

El Professor Nabi® ❤️✌️نبي's profile picture
El Professor Nabi® ❤️✌️نبي1 year ago

🤝

SD(Ndaba)'s profile picture
SD(Ndaba)1 year ago

Bafo Stellies benefitted here..please respect Laizer chiefs before you write such...

Makgoba Tumelo's profile picture
Makgoba Tumelo1 year ago

According to me Chiefs didn't benefitted

Related Videos