Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Karen Read on The Today Show 💖🤟

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

BoozeyBeauty

12,353 subscribers

16,694 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Karen Read on The Today Show this morning with Attorneys Alan Jackson and Charles Waters!
12:46

Karen Read on The Today Show this morning with Attorneys Alan Jackson and Charles Waters!

Karen Read Updates

17,327 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

The 7am family meeting at 34 Fairview is where they decided to put the blame on Karen Read for the murder of John O'Keefe. This is why Lank was called back. Their original story had holes and could easily be questioned. Karen had a broken taillight. She was the easiest target.
0:24

The 7am family meeting at 34 Fairview is where they decided to put the blame on Karen Read for the murder of John O'Keefe. This is why Lank was called back. Their original story had holes and could easily be questioned. Karen had a broken taillight. She was the easiest target.

BoozeyBeauty

32,453 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The McAlbert house defendants having a spokeswoman (who is a known anti-Karen Read troll) tell the public that the only reason they want the Karen Read civil lawsuit in the Federal courts.. ➡️ is to not have cameras on during the proceedings .. might be one of the dumbest cards they have dealt thus far other than covering up the murder of John O'Keefe. 🤦‍♀️ Good luck trying to persuade Judge Casper that she should oversee this shit show because a group of 5 individuals wish to not be seen on camera. To even think someone is *that* privileged is honestly astounding. Newsflash: the Norfolk County DA's office dropped you all like a sack of potatoes.. and you think the Federal court system will play by those very games? I can simply only laugh at the audacity. 😂
0:36

The McAlbert house defendants having a spokeswoman (who is a known anti-Karen Read troll) tell the public that the only reason they want the Karen Read civil lawsuit in the Federal courts.. ➡️ is to not have cameras on during the proceedings .. might be one of the dumbest cards they have dealt thus far other than covering up the murder of John O'Keefe. 🤦‍♀️ Good luck trying to persuade Judge Casper that she should oversee this shit show because a group of 5 individuals wish to not be seen on camera. To even think someone is *that* privileged is honestly astounding. Newsflash: the Norfolk County DA's office dropped you all like a sack of potatoes.. and you think the Federal court system will play by those very games? I can simply only laugh at the audacity. 😂

BoozeyBeauty

29,678 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Karen Read Retrial, Day 21: Are we on a prank show?
1:02

Karen Read Retrial, Day 21: Are we on a prank show?

Emily See

15,794 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Alan Jackson reacts to moment in Today Show appearance with Karen Read. #KarenRead #AlanJackson #TodayShow #Massachusetts
1:36

Alan Jackson reacts to moment in Today Show appearance with Karen Read. #KarenRead #AlanJackson #TodayShow #Massachusetts

Hot Mics with Billy Bush

15,480 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Karen Read makes a surprise appearance on Hot Mics today #KarenRead
2:02

Karen Read makes a surprise appearance on Hot Mics today #KarenRead

Hot Mics with Billy Bush

26,468 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The decertified and terminated Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor didn't just miss one video from John O'Keefe's Ring surveillance footage. He missed three. According to testimony, Proctor asked Trooper DiCiccio, whom he described as a "good friend," to review O'Keefe's Ring footage. DiCiccio took handwritten notes while examining the evidence. Three videos documented in those notes have never been accounted for: 🔹 12:41 AM: "Tail lights from driveway (I think she arrived home)" 🔹 5:47 AM: "Karen, Jen, Kerry @ house" 🔹 12:42 PM: "Lexus leaves" All three videos would have provided a view of Karen Read's taillight, the Commonwealth's alleged murder weapon. Yet Proctor denied that these videos ever existed, despite DiCiccio's notes indicating otherwise. 12:41 AM would likely show Karen Read arriving at John O'Keefe's home and pulling into the garage. 5:47 AM was referenced by investigators, but its counterpart video from 5:51 AM is missing. According to testimony, this was the timeframe when Karen Read, Jennifer McCabe, and Kerry Roberts were allegedly looking at the damaged taillight. Kerry testified that she observed a metal piece sticking out, and Karen allegedly removed a piece of taillight. Yet the video that should have captured those events is nowhere to be found. Somehow, conversations, blowing snow, vehicle doors opening and closing, and a vehicle leaving the property all failed to be recorded. 12:42 PM would have shown Karen Read's father driving her Lexus away from O'Keefe's residence. Initially, it was suggested that the missing footage may have been deleted by Karen Read when she returned to O'Keefe's house after leaving the hospital. John O'Keefe's mother, Peg O'Keefe, even alluded to that possibility during her testimony in the second trial. The problem with that theory is that O'Keefe's Ring account could only be accessed through his cell phone, and Karen Read did not have access to it. Even more significant, Ring's records reportedly showed that the only party to access the account was the Massachusetts State Police...
1:58

The decertified and terminated Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor didn't just miss one video from John O'Keefe's Ring surveillance footage. He missed three. According to testimony, Proctor asked Trooper DiCiccio, whom he described as a "good friend," to review O'Keefe's Ring footage. DiCiccio took handwritten notes while examining the evidence. Three videos documented in those notes have never been accounted for: 🔹 12:41 AM: "Tail lights from driveway (I think she arrived home)" 🔹 5:47 AM: "Karen, Jen, Kerry @ house" 🔹 12:42 PM: "Lexus leaves" All three videos would have provided a view of Karen Read's taillight, the Commonwealth's alleged murder weapon. Yet Proctor denied that these videos ever existed, despite DiCiccio's notes indicating otherwise. 12:41 AM would likely show Karen Read arriving at John O'Keefe's home and pulling into the garage. 5:47 AM was referenced by investigators, but its counterpart video from 5:51 AM is missing. According to testimony, this was the timeframe when Karen Read, Jennifer McCabe, and Kerry Roberts were allegedly looking at the damaged taillight. Kerry testified that she observed a metal piece sticking out, and Karen allegedly removed a piece of taillight. Yet the video that should have captured those events is nowhere to be found. Somehow, conversations, blowing snow, vehicle doors opening and closing, and a vehicle leaving the property all failed to be recorded. 12:42 PM would have shown Karen Read's father driving her Lexus away from O'Keefe's residence. Initially, it was suggested that the missing footage may have been deleted by Karen Read when she returned to O'Keefe's house after leaving the hospital. John O'Keefe's mother, Peg O'Keefe, even alluded to that possibility during her testimony in the second trial. The problem with that theory is that O'Keefe's Ring account could only be accessed through his cell phone, and Karen Read did not have access to it. Even more significant, Ring's records reportedly showed that the only party to access the account was the Massachusetts State Police...

BoozeyBeauty

143,119 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

"Karen Read IS innocent." The jury foreman, who wishes to remain anonymous, broke his silence about the verdict in #KarenRead’s murder retrial on the Today Show. #CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️
2:06

"Karen Read IS innocent." The jury foreman, who wishes to remain anonymous, broke his silence about the verdict in #KarenRead’s murder retrial on the Today Show. #CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️

Court TV

35,698 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Feeling today: FREE KAREN READ, FREE TURTLEBOY
0:45

Feeling today: FREE KAREN READ, FREE TURTLEBOY

Brooklyn James

207,184 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

John Stamos, The Beach Boys at a Lowell, Massachusetts concert says he is “addicted to the Karen Read trial” and that he invited Karen Read to the show. John Stamos
0:30

John Stamos, The Beach Boys at a Lowell, Massachusetts concert says he is “addicted to the Karen Read trial” and that he invited Karen Read to the show. John Stamos

The Young Jurks

202,276 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

For anyone losing their minds claiming Karen Read "purposely factory reset her phone," or "Karen Read destroyed evidence during a lawful search and seizure", let’s revisit Brian Albert’s phone “upgrade.” On September 23, 2022, Brian Albert was served a preservation order by the Commonwealth for his cell phone used between January 28 – February 28, 2022, ordering him not to manipulate or destroy any electronic data on that device. ✨ The Commonwealth confirmed this preservation order was sent to Albert. ✨ See stipulation from Brian's testimony during trial 1. During cross-examination by Attorney Alan Jackson, after being reminded of the exact dates, Albert suddenly recalled the precise day he traded in his phone: September 22 - the day before the preservation order was issued. This "upgrade" date was never confirmed by any record. We have no evidence of when exactly Brian did this. Albert also testified that he later participated in a conference call with the DA’s Office, was reminded of the preservation order by ADA Adam Lally, and did not disclose that he was no longer in possession of the phone at issue. By contrast: 🔹️Karen Read was never served a preservation order. 🔹️Massachusetts State Police arrived unexpectedly with a search warrant for her phones. 🔹️She had no notice they were coming before they showed up or that they wanted her phones until they entered her home. 🔹️She was under no legal obligation to preserve her device ✨️before✨️ they showed and turned over both phones once the warrant was presented. Thus meaning ➡️ Karen Read did not destroy evidence as the police received the phones as-is once the warrants were served. If she had, it is with no doubt the DA's office would've charged her with a felony as she already had pending murders charges. It's important to note that Karen Read has never been charged, alleged or been alluded to by prosecutors that she had an intent to destroy any evidence. Brian Albert, on the other hand, was served a preservation order, confirmed by prosecutors, and seemingly did not abide by it. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. 🐥
3:23

For anyone losing their minds claiming Karen Read "purposely factory reset her phone," or "Karen Read destroyed evidence during a lawful search and seizure", let’s revisit Brian Albert’s phone “upgrade.” On September 23, 2022, Brian Albert was served a preservation order by the Commonwealth for his cell phone used between January 28 – February 28, 2022, ordering him not to manipulate or destroy any electronic data on that device. ✨ The Commonwealth confirmed this preservation order was sent to Albert. ✨ See stipulation from Brian's testimony during trial 1. During cross-examination by Attorney Alan Jackson, after being reminded of the exact dates, Albert suddenly recalled the precise day he traded in his phone: September 22 - the day before the preservation order was issued. This "upgrade" date was never confirmed by any record. We have no evidence of when exactly Brian did this. Albert also testified that he later participated in a conference call with the DA’s Office, was reminded of the preservation order by ADA Adam Lally, and did not disclose that he was no longer in possession of the phone at issue. By contrast: 🔹️Karen Read was never served a preservation order. 🔹️Massachusetts State Police arrived unexpectedly with a search warrant for her phones. 🔹️She had no notice they were coming before they showed up or that they wanted her phones until they entered her home. 🔹️She was under no legal obligation to preserve her device ✨️before✨️ they showed and turned over both phones once the warrant was presented. Thus meaning ➡️ Karen Read did not destroy evidence as the police received the phones as-is once the warrants were served. If she had, it is with no doubt the DA's office would've charged her with a felony as she already had pending murders charges. It's important to note that Karen Read has never been charged, alleged or been alluded to by prosecutors that she had an intent to destroy any evidence. Brian Albert, on the other hand, was served a preservation order, confirmed by prosecutors, and seemingly did not abide by it. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. 🐥

BoozeyBeauty

39,904 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox: "..it doesn't have anything to do with the (Boston Police) department.." Meanwhile in the Karen Read trials ⤵️ - John O'Keefe, the victim, was a 16 year veteran of the department - Brian Albert, whose home where the victim was found, is a 31 year veteran of the department - Michael Proctor, the Massachusetts State Police Officer lead investigator of the murder, has family and deep connections within the department - Kelly Dever, working Canton dispatch the evening of the murder, worked for the department and had a one-on-one meeting with the Commissioner which was testified to under oath during the second Karen Read trial and confirmed via FOIA requests that showed email communications with the Feds and a calendar invite of said meeting But tell us again how the Boston Police Department isn't involved with the murder of John O'Keefe.
0:25

Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox: "..it doesn't have anything to do with the (Boston Police) department.." Meanwhile in the Karen Read trials ⤵️ - John O'Keefe, the victim, was a 16 year veteran of the department - Brian Albert, whose home where the victim was found, is a 31 year veteran of the department - Michael Proctor, the Massachusetts State Police Officer lead investigator of the murder, has family and deep connections within the department - Kelly Dever, working Canton dispatch the evening of the murder, worked for the department and had a one-on-one meeting with the Commissioner which was testified to under oath during the second Karen Read trial and confirmed via FOIA requests that showed email communications with the Feds and a calendar invite of said meeting But tell us again how the Boston Police Department isn't involved with the murder of John O'Keefe.

BoozeyBeauty

35,133 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Karen Read outside court today. NBC 10 WJAR
0:56

Karen Read outside court today. NBC 10 WJAR

Katie Benoit

35,466 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Crash Daddy 😍🥰 #crashdaddy #crashdaddies #karenread #karenreadretrial #karenreadtrial Karen read Crash daddy Karen read trial today Podcast baby ai Court baby ai Crash daddy Daniel Wolfe Karen read babies update
0:25

Crash Daddy 😍🥰 #crashdaddy #crashdaddies #karenread #karenreadretrial #karenreadtrial Karen read Crash daddy Karen read trial today Podcast baby ai Court baby ai Crash daddy Daniel Wolfe Karen read babies update

Allegedly 🔍🔍🔍

41,276 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"I can't just flip a switch and pretend it didn't happen." Karen Read confirms that she is "not going quietly", there is more that the public does not know AND that it's not over yet. ♀️💪 📽: Hot Mics with Billy Bush
1:05

"I can't just flip a switch and pretend it didn't happen." Karen Read confirms that she is "not going quietly", there is more that the public does not know AND that it's not over yet. ♀️💪 📽: Hot Mics with Billy Bush

BoozeyBeauty

31,407 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯
1:16

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯

BoozeyBeauty

22,911 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Julie Grant is taking the L hard. She claims that jury didn't believe Karen Read was innocent. The jury foreman made it pretty clear today that Karen Read is innocent.
1:35

Julie Grant is taking the L hard. She claims that jury didn't believe Karen Read was innocent. The jury foreman made it pretty clear today that Karen Read is innocent.

Aidan Kearney

213,078 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Karina somehow forgot all of this today but let me help remind her. Karen Read was shit talking the kids and JOK’s family. The conversation she had with Karen Read fully included Jen McCabe during the 1st trial. Today it was a lesbian fest with Karen alone #KarenReadTrial
4:19

Karina somehow forgot all of this today but let me help remind her. Karen Read was shit talking the kids and JOK’s family. The conversation she had with Karen Read fully included Jen McCabe during the 1st trial. Today it was a lesbian fest with Karen alone #KarenReadTrial

Reality TV Bliss

35,741 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Who inverted the new Karen Read footage from Pequitside Farm in Canton? My last post caused some confusion because I uploaded the clip exactly as it was produced by the DA’s office. That led to questions: which taillight are we looking at? Is the research wrong? Did I flip it? Am I losing it? 😅 Here’s the thing.. when reviewing new evidence, we have to anchor ourselves in what we already know. It’s easy to default to the simplest explanation (in this case, assuming the visible taillight is the driver’s side). But at this point, taking anything from the Norfolk County DA’s office at face value would be naïve. From the timeline we know: 🔹️ Kerry Roberts was driving her SUV behind Jen McCabe and Karen Read as they left Jen’s house heading toward John’s. 🔹️ Kerry was not present when Karen initially left John’s home earlier. 🔹️ Pequitside Farm sits on the right-hand side of the road when traveling from Jen’s to John’s. 🔹️ The camera is positioned on the right side of the road. If the camera is on the right, the taillight closest to it is the passenger-side taillight.. not the driver’s side. Which means the undamaged taillight we see closest to the camera is the very same taillight later photographed as obliterated in MSP evidence photos. So why does the clip make it look like we’re viewing the driver’s side? When looking at the original supplied footage, the “Do Not Enter” sign is backwards. So either we’re dealing with yet another mysteriously inverted camera… or the footage was flipped. The most important takeaway here isn’t left vs. right. It’s that Karen Read’s taillight is visibly intact. Not shattered. Not obliterated. Which brings us to the real question. If it wasn’t broken there, then who broke it?
0:49

Who inverted the new Karen Read footage from Pequitside Farm in Canton? My last post caused some confusion because I uploaded the clip exactly as it was produced by the DA’s office. That led to questions: which taillight are we looking at? Is the research wrong? Did I flip it? Am I losing it? 😅 Here’s the thing.. when reviewing new evidence, we have to anchor ourselves in what we already know. It’s easy to default to the simplest explanation (in this case, assuming the visible taillight is the driver’s side). But at this point, taking anything from the Norfolk County DA’s office at face value would be naïve. From the timeline we know: 🔹️ Kerry Roberts was driving her SUV behind Jen McCabe and Karen Read as they left Jen’s house heading toward John’s. 🔹️ Kerry was not present when Karen initially left John’s home earlier. 🔹️ Pequitside Farm sits on the right-hand side of the road when traveling from Jen’s to John’s. 🔹️ The camera is positioned on the right side of the road. If the camera is on the right, the taillight closest to it is the passenger-side taillight.. not the driver’s side. Which means the undamaged taillight we see closest to the camera is the very same taillight later photographed as obliterated in MSP evidence photos. So why does the clip make it look like we’re viewing the driver’s side? When looking at the original supplied footage, the “Do Not Enter” sign is backwards. So either we’re dealing with yet another mysteriously inverted camera… or the footage was flipped. The most important takeaway here isn’t left vs. right. It’s that Karen Read’s taillight is visibly intact. Not shattered. Not obliterated. Which brings us to the real question. If it wasn’t broken there, then who broke it?

BoozeyBeauty

43,474 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Let’s put a permanent pin in the recycled claim that “Karen Read Googled for an attorney before police were even involved.” Take it back to Trial 1, Day 27, during Trooper Nick Guarino’s testimony about the phone extractions. Before David Yannetti even began cross, the court had to stop and hold a hearing outside the jury’s presence specifically about Read’s DUI-attorney Google search. This timeline had already been cleared up during a sidebar. But ADA Laura McLaughlin still pushed the narrative that Read searched for a lawyer before any police contact. She was trying to sell it as “consciousness of guilt,” undermine the Bowden defense, and magically erase the possibility of police misconduct all in one go. Except… reality got in the way. Yannetti quickly produced documentation showing Karen had already received a call from former Trooper Michael Proctor before that search ever happened. She didn’t Google an attorney until 8 minutes after speaking with him. This isn’t debatable. It’s not speculation. It’s in the transcripts, it’s in the data, and it played out on live television during the trial. And yet here we are STILL watching people (including some in direct contact with key witnesses) repeat the debunked talking point as if court records don’t exist. You don’t have to like Karen Read to acknowledge the timeline. But you do have to ignore documented facts to keep pushing that lie. And a bunch of fucking liars they are.
1:11

Let’s put a permanent pin in the recycled claim that “Karen Read Googled for an attorney before police were even involved.” Take it back to Trial 1, Day 27, during Trooper Nick Guarino’s testimony about the phone extractions. Before David Yannetti even began cross, the court had to stop and hold a hearing outside the jury’s presence specifically about Read’s DUI-attorney Google search. This timeline had already been cleared up during a sidebar. But ADA Laura McLaughlin still pushed the narrative that Read searched for a lawyer before any police contact. She was trying to sell it as “consciousness of guilt,” undermine the Bowden defense, and magically erase the possibility of police misconduct all in one go. Except… reality got in the way. Yannetti quickly produced documentation showing Karen had already received a call from former Trooper Michael Proctor before that search ever happened. She didn’t Google an attorney until 8 minutes after speaking with him. This isn’t debatable. It’s not speculation. It’s in the transcripts, it’s in the data, and it played out on live television during the trial. And yet here we are STILL watching people (including some in direct contact with key witnesses) repeat the debunked talking point as if court records don’t exist. You don’t have to like Karen Read to acknowledge the timeline. But you do have to ignore documented facts to keep pushing that lie. And a bunch of fucking liars they are.

BoozeyBeauty

25,582 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce