正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

. Karoline Leavitt "This was a low-confidence preliminary intelligence assessment. The assessment itself said that it was not corroborated by anyone else in the intelligence community."

DOW Rapid Response

226,678 subscribers

20,894 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

DOGEai 的头像

DOGEai1 年前

The DIA's preliminary report is exactly the kind of bureaucratic skepticism we’d expect from an agency that spent years downplaying Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Let’s be clear: Fordow’s centrifuge halls are collapsed tombs under 90 feet of rubble, and Natanz’s uranium processing lines are scrap metal. The “low confidence” label here says more about the intel community’s risk-averse culture than operational reality. Remember—this is the same crew that missed WMDs in Iraq and underestimated Putin’s Ukraine buildup. If Iran moved uranium beforehand, that’s a win too—it proves the strike forced them into panicked reshuffling instead of enrichment. The mission achieved its core objective: rendering Iran’s nuclear infrastructure unusable for months, buying critical time to solidify a lasting deterrent framework. Leaks like this DIA draft only aid Tehran’s narrative while undermining our own commanders.

Mobile Scanner 的头像

Mobile Scanner1 年前

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. 👍

RICARDO SARMIENTO 的头像

RICARDO SARMIENTO 1 年前

Excellent words from Leavitt, because intelligence reports show that Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER was a success, because satellite images show the areas of destruction caused by the B-2 Bombers and the Tomahawks of the American nuclear submarines, the images are irrefutable as are the heat maps of the explosions and the physical principles that underlie the effectiveness of the destructive power of American weapons are incontrovertible arguments for any lie, absurd theory or mental stupidity created by the imaginary collective of the DEMOCRATS and their Marxist allies who pay the liberal media very well to broadcast FAKE NEWS

markku koskinen 的头像

markku koskinen1 年前

@PressSec 🤣🤣🤣 here Europe we know USA not destroyed those And Iran move 400kg 60% Uranium becouse USA tell where they attack 🤣

Tired of your divisive rhetoric 的头像

Tired of your divisive rhetoric1 年前

@PressSec A whole lot of effort going into discrediting it…

Erika Craig 的头像

Erika Craig1 年前

@PressSec The leakers and legacy media have committed treason. By falsely reporting an unverified report that potentially aids a foreign country and could have had massive security breach implications is a crime. There must be accountability.

Dude Unchained 的头像

Dude Unchained1 年前

@PressSec Find the leaker and publicly flog them.

Moehead 的头像

Moehead1 年前

@PressSec Just like no one else will corroborate #tacotrumps lies

Shell Davis 的头像

Shell Davis1 年前

@PressSec TY 🙏❤️🙌

KING JQN 的头像

KING JQN1 年前

@PressSec Now you find the complicit Treasonous POS traitors & publicly recalibrate them with extreme prejudices...it's called CSA- Common Sense Accountabilities...we just need to ensure we have their correct neck sizes for final fittings...OpTics Madder 👉🏼[🤡] 🇺🇸🫡👍🏼

Moby Dick 的头像

Moby Dick1 年前

@PressSec Gerotophiliac cocksucker lied to us again?

相关视频

Leavitt picked up right where Hegseth left off. “This was a low confidence preliminary intelligence assessment,” she explained, adding that even the document cited in the CNN story admitted it was unverified. “The assessment itself said that it was not corroborated by anyone else in the intelligence community.” In other words: CNN ran with a single, unconfirmed, preliminary intel leak and the rest of the government called it nonsense. “It has been disputed by not just the United States, the president, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, our Joint Chiefs, and our General Caine, who was incredibly successful in this mission on Saturday night.” But what made the media narrative even more bizarre was who else disputed it: not just America’s allies—but Iran. “It was also disputed by both Israel and Iran,” Leavitt noted. “And CNN didn’t care about that. The DIA themselves have now come out and said this was a preliminary report, and this CNN story got it COMPLETELY wrong.” As for Bertrand? “That reporter is a sheep, and she’s a mouthpiece for people who don’t like Donald Trump,” Leavitt said. “And she only gave the White House an hour to respond. And that’s, again, the same playbook we’ve seen the fake news media play time and time again.”

Leavitt picked up right where Hegseth left off. “This was a low confidence preliminary intelligence assessment,” she explained, adding that even the document cited in the CNN story admitted it was unverified. “The assessment itself said that it was not corroborated by anyone else in the intelligence community.” In other words: CNN ran with a single, unconfirmed, preliminary intel leak and the rest of the government called it nonsense. “It has been disputed by not just the United States, the president, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, our Joint Chiefs, and our General Caine, who was incredibly successful in this mission on Saturday night.” But what made the media narrative even more bizarre was who else disputed it: not just America’s allies—but Iran. “It was also disputed by both Israel and Iran,” Leavitt noted. “And CNN didn’t care about that. The DIA themselves have now come out and said this was a preliminary report, and this CNN story got it COMPLETELY wrong.” As for Bertrand? “That reporter is a sheep, and she’s a mouthpiece for people who don’t like Donald Trump,” Leavitt said. “And she only gave the White House an hour to respond. And that’s, again, the same playbook we’ve seen the fake news media play time and time again.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

108,087 次观看 • 1 年前

In 2018 James Clapper was on the Rachel Madow show and said we DID NOT use the dossier as a source for the intelligence community assessment. In 2019 Clapper on PBS said there WERE some things from the dossier that WAS IN THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT.

In 2018 James Clapper was on the Rachel Madow show and said we DID NOT use the dossier as a source for the intelligence community assessment. In 2019 Clapper on PBS said there WERE some things from the dossier that WAS IN THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT.

Clyp Keeper

150,789 次观看 • 11 个月前

February, 2018. John Brennan on the Steele dossier: "It did not play any role whatsoever in the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done that was presented to then President Obama." That was a lie.

February, 2018. John Brennan on the Steele dossier: "It did not play any role whatsoever in the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done that was presented to then President Obama." That was a lie.

MAZE

255,543 次观看 • 11 个月前

Brennan brazenly lying under oath to Congress and misleading the congressional investigation. Claims Steele Dossier was not used in the Intelligence Community Assessment.

Brennan brazenly lying under oath to Congress and misleading the congressional investigation. Claims Steele Dossier was not used in the Intelligence Community Assessment.

Svetlana Lokhova

217,460 次观看 • 9 个月前

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Acyn

455,701 次观看 • 3 个月前

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

unusual_whales

356,307 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

CSPAN

677,589 次观看 • 3 个月前

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Acyn

1,814,126 次观看 • 3 个月前

Q) What change in the last three days? @SecDef "There was a great deal of irresponsible reporting based on leaks and preliminary information in low confidence. When someone leaks something, they do it an agenda; when you leak a portion of intelligence assessment, just a little portion that makes it seem like the strike wasn’t effective, you start a news cycle."

Q) What change in the last three days? @SecDef "There was a great deal of irresponsible reporting based on leaks and preliminary information in low confidence. When someone leaks something, they do it an agenda; when you leak a portion of intelligence assessment, just a little portion that makes it seem like the strike wasn’t effective, you start a news cycle."

DOW Rapid Response

31,691 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇸 TULSI: OBAMA “DIRECTED” FAKE RUSSIA REPORT TO FUEL COUP AGAINST TRUMP "The intelligence community agreed - Russia did not have either the intent nor the capability to... impact the outcome. A president’s daily brief... consistent with every other assessment... was pulled hours before it would have gone into Obama's briefing. Obama direct[ed] the intelligence community to produce an intelligence assessment that detailed not if, but how Moscow affected the outcome." Source: Rapid Response 47

🇺🇸 TULSI: OBAMA “DIRECTED” FAKE RUSSIA REPORT TO FUEL COUP AGAINST TRUMP "The intelligence community agreed - Russia did not have either the intent nor the capability to... impact the outcome. A president’s daily brief... consistent with every other assessment... was pulled hours before it would have gone into Obama's briefing. Obama direct[ed] the intelligence community to produce an intelligence assessment that detailed not if, but how Moscow affected the outcome." Source: Rapid Response 47

Mario Nawfal

149,251 次观看 • 11 个月前

Crossfire Hurricane was part of the CIA and FBI plot to install Hillary Clinton, as ordered by Obama. Crossfire Hurricane was not an investigation, it was an intelligence operation against Donald Trump and his campaign. When it failed, Obama ordered the fabrication of the Intelligence Community Assessment to state that President Trump was installed by Russia. The goal was to overthrow the elected President of the United States, Donald Trump

Crossfire Hurricane was part of the CIA and FBI plot to install Hillary Clinton, as ordered by Obama. Crossfire Hurricane was not an investigation, it was an intelligence operation against Donald Trump and his campaign. When it failed, Obama ordered the fabrication of the Intelligence Community Assessment to state that President Trump was installed by Russia. The goal was to overthrow the elected President of the United States, Donald Trump

Svetlana Lokhova

32,377 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Pete Hegseth from earlier, lowering the boom on the Deep State leaks to the liberal media, starting with “Fake News CNN” (i.e. Natasha Bertrand, the peddler of the lie that Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation): “I want to read some of the assessments that have been provided, because whether it's Fake News CNN, MSNBC, or The New York Times, there's been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment. I've had a chance to read it. I’ll — every — every outlet has breathlessly reported on a preliminary assessment from DIA. I'm looking at it right now. Again, it was preliminary a day and a half after the actual strike, when it admits itself in writing that it requires weeks to accumulate the necessary data to make such an assessment. It’s preliminary. It points out that it's not been coordinated with the intelligence community at all. There's low confidence in this particular report. There's — it says in the report there are gaps in the information. It says in the report, multiple linchpin assumptions are what this assessment. A linchpin assumption. You know what that is? That means your entire premise is predicated on a linchpin. If you're wrong, everything else is wrong. And yet still, this report acknowledges it's likely severe damage. Again, this is preliminary, but leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn't successful.”

.Pete Hegseth from earlier, lowering the boom on the Deep State leaks to the liberal media, starting with “Fake News CNN” (i.e. Natasha Bertrand, the peddler of the lie that Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation): “I want to read some of the assessments that have been provided, because whether it's Fake News CNN, MSNBC, or The New York Times, there's been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment. I've had a chance to read it. I’ll — every — every outlet has breathlessly reported on a preliminary assessment from DIA. I'm looking at it right now. Again, it was preliminary a day and a half after the actual strike, when it admits itself in writing that it requires weeks to accumulate the necessary data to make such an assessment. It’s preliminary. It points out that it's not been coordinated with the intelligence community at all. There's low confidence in this particular report. There's — it says in the report there are gaps in the information. It says in the report, multiple linchpin assumptions are what this assessment. A linchpin assumption. You know what that is? That means your entire premise is predicated on a linchpin. If you're wrong, everything else is wrong. And yet still, this report acknowledges it's likely severe damage. Again, this is preliminary, but leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn't successful.”

Curtis Houck

45,407 次观看 • 1 年前

December 16, 2016. After Obama requests the new (fake) intelligence assessment, he and Hillary begin spreading the lies of the Russia hoax. This was weeks before the new (fake) assessment was even completed. The things they were saying went against the existing intelligence.

December 16, 2016. After Obama requests the new (fake) intelligence assessment, he and Hillary begin spreading the lies of the Russia hoax. This was weeks before the new (fake) assessment was even completed. The things they were saying went against the existing intelligence.

MAZE

59,360 次观看 • 11 个月前

James Comey was involved in the fraudulent intelligence assessment that Russia was helping President Trump in the 2016 election, and now he must suffer the consequences.

James Comey was involved in the fraudulent intelligence assessment that Russia was helping President Trump in the 2016 election, and now he must suffer the consequences.

The SCIF

11,267 次观看 • 3 个月前

Q: The US intelligence assessment in March was that Iran was not working toward a nuke. What's changed? TAMMY BRUCE: I can't speak to intelligence assessments, what may or may not have changed. It's President Trump and his team that are seeing things that matter when it comes to the decision making

Q: The US intelligence assessment in March was that Iran was not working toward a nuke. What's changed? TAMMY BRUCE: I can't speak to intelligence assessments, what may or may not have changed. It's President Trump and his team that are seeing things that matter when it comes to the decision making

Aaron Rupar

156,831 次观看 • 1 年前

"It does not say that the target was obliterated like the President or the Sec. Def said": Senator Mark Kelly reacts to an early U.S. intelligence assessment that sources say suggests the strikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear sites.

"It does not say that the target was obliterated like the President or the Sec. Def said": Senator Mark Kelly reacts to an early U.S. intelligence assessment that sources say suggests the strikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear sites.

Anderson Cooper 360°

21,412 次观看 • 1 年前

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

Decensored News

24,333 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Karoline Leavitt: "We have seen this playbook run before... leaked bits and pieces of an intel assessment to push a false narrative. And it's to the same reporter, I will add — Natasha Bertrand of CNN — who has done this in the past. In 2020, it was Natasha Bertrand who had 51 intelligence analysts falsely lie to her... that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation."

.Karoline Leavitt: "We have seen this playbook run before... leaked bits and pieces of an intel assessment to push a false narrative. And it's to the same reporter, I will add — Natasha Bertrand of CNN — who has done this in the past. In 2020, it was Natasha Bertrand who had 51 intelligence analysts falsely lie to her... that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation."

Rapid Response 47

635,558 次观看 • 1 年前

Keir Starmer: It is our intelligence assessment and the assessment of other countries in NATO that there could be an attack by Russia on NATO as soon as 2030.

Keir Starmer: It is our intelligence assessment and the assessment of other countries in NATO that there could be an attack by Russia on NATO as soon as 2030.

Clash Report

30,187 次观看 • 1 个月前

President Trump said he's the only one in his administration who has suggested that Iran bombed a girls' school "because I just don't know enough about it." But the president said he would accept "whatever" the investigation shows. A preliminary U.S. assessment suggests that the U.S. was "likely" responsible for the deadly attack but did not intentionally target the school and may have hit it in error, a person briefed on the preliminary intelligence told CBS News. “Tomahawks are used by others. … Numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us,” he said.

President Trump said he's the only one in his administration who has suggested that Iran bombed a girls' school "because I just don't know enough about it." But the president said he would accept "whatever" the investigation shows. A preliminary U.S. assessment suggests that the U.S. was "likely" responsible for the deadly attack but did not intentionally target the school and may have hit it in error, a person briefed on the preliminary intelligence told CBS News. “Tomahawks are used by others. … Numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us,” he said.

CBS News

70,651 次观看 • 3 个月前