Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Kenyon Martin Almost Throws Hands With Nick Young For Being Disrespectful… Tells Him “STFU, You A Child” During Coach Popovich Legacy Talk‼️ Nick Throw Hands Professionally, Kenyon Gonna F-Around and Get Put To Sleep‼️🥴🤛🏿 #KenyonMartin #NickYoung #Fight #Disrespectful #FunniestVideos #stunner #worldstar #Trending #Viral #Unbelievable #Interview #Conversation Mr. Sauce Talk

RealSauceTalk's profile picture

Mr. Sauce Talk

1,835 subscribers

13,352 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

#KenyonMartin#NickYoung#Fight#Disrespectful
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Lou Williams says Kobe Bryant interrupted D’Angelo Russell’s apology to Nick Young and told the Lakers, “Cut all this Kumbaya shit. We got a game to play” “When Nick and DLo were going through their thing, I had to deal with a lot of it because I was the vet in the locker room and I was present. I remember DLo calling me, and he was like, ‘OG, I fucked up.’ Yeah, you fucked up. I said, ‘You got to call Nick. Y’all got to get that right’” “So we put it out that we was going to have a team meeting right before the game for DLo to address the team, address Nick, apologize, wash our hands with it and try to move on. Everybody is in the lounge. We chilling out. Nick comes in, DLo comes in, the whole team, everybody sits down, minus Kobe. He’s probably in the building. He’s just not interested in what the fuck we got going on” “DLo is starting his speech, and honestly, it’s helping. We breaking the wall down because people don’t realize for like two or three weeks, it was a lot of tension. They really wanted to have a fight. Nick couldn’t even come around. So we finally got them to get in the same room and have a conversation. And DLo was going through his whole thing, ‘I apologize. I took it too far,’ this and that” “Everybody kind of chipping in, and it’s a good moment for us because we’ve been having our struggles a little bit. Kobe walks clean through the meeting and says, ‘Hey man, cut all this Kumbaya shit. We got a game to play.’ It just squashes the meeting, and everybody looked around like, ‘Well, let’s get ready to play basketball’”
1:52

Lou Williams says Kobe Bryant interrupted D’Angelo Russell’s apology to Nick Young and told the Lakers, “Cut all this Kumbaya shit. We got a game to play” “When Nick and DLo were going through their thing, I had to deal with a lot of it because I was the vet in the locker room and I was present. I remember DLo calling me, and he was like, ‘OG, I fucked up.’ Yeah, you fucked up. I said, ‘You got to call Nick. Y’all got to get that right’” “So we put it out that we was going to have a team meeting right before the game for DLo to address the team, address Nick, apologize, wash our hands with it and try to move on. Everybody is in the lounge. We chilling out. Nick comes in, DLo comes in, the whole team, everybody sits down, minus Kobe. He’s probably in the building. He’s just not interested in what the fuck we got going on” “DLo is starting his speech, and honestly, it’s helping. We breaking the wall down because people don’t realize for like two or three weeks, it was a lot of tension. They really wanted to have a fight. Nick couldn’t even come around. So we finally got them to get in the same room and have a conversation. And DLo was going through his whole thing, ‘I apologize. I took it too far,’ this and that” “Everybody kind of chipping in, and it’s a good moment for us because we’ve been having our struggles a little bit. Kobe walks clean through the meeting and says, ‘Hey man, cut all this Kumbaya shit. We got a game to play.’ It just squashes the meeting, and everybody looked around like, ‘Well, let’s get ready to play basketball’”

dank

168,311 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The 2016 Breakfast Club interview with Lakeith Stanfield set an early tone that later exploded into a years-long back-and-forth‼️. Stanfield, then rising off "Atlanta", *Straight Outta Compton* (as Snoop), and *Get Out*, came on to talk acting‼️. The hosts asked about his rapping (he has a project/group called The Moors and has released music)‼️. He delivered a dense, wordy freestyle‼️. Charlamagne and the crew were visibly unimpressed—the clip they later posted and referenced captures the awkward “that’s it⁉️” energy and some teasing‼️. Charlamagne later framed it as him trying to steer Stanfield: great actor, terrible rapper, don’t waste time on it‼️. In 2018, when Stanfield posted an “offensive freestyle” with homophobic language and a weak apology, Charlamagne replayed the 2016 moment on *Donkey of the Day* and doubled down on the same point‼️. That moment wasn’t the main feud, but it planted the seed‼️. Stanfield is eccentric, artsy, and doesn’t move like a typical rapper or radio guest‼️. Charlamagne’s show thrives on unfiltered grilling, roasts, and “keeping it real.” Asking an actor to rap on the spot and then dismissing it publicly can feel like a gotcha or public diminishment rather than genuine curiosity‼️. How it escalated⁉️ In 2019 Stanfield posted that platforms like The Breakfast Club, The Shade Room, WorldStar, and Lipstick Alley act as “feeding grounds for negative reinforcement toward BLACK ‘nonconformists’” and “slave mentality museums.” Charlamagne took it personally, gave him *Donkey of the Day*, called him a hypocrite for not going after white media (Hollywood handlers wouldn’t allow it), brought up the old freestyle and other interviews, and told him not to call the author of *Black Privilege* anti-Black‼️. Stanfield responded with the diss track “Automatic,” using Sambo-style imagery of Charlamagne and lines like “Insecure, you afraid, you’s a Charlamagne.”‼️ In 2021, during Daniel Kaluuya’s *Judas and the Black Messiah* interview, Charlamagne asked if Kaluuya looked at Stanfield differently because he played the informant “too well”—implying he was born for the snitch role‼️. Kaluuya shut it down immediately‼️. Stanfield called Charlamagne a “hoe” and later posted a video pointing a gun at his picture‼️. Charlamagne said he “owed him that” jab after the earlier shots‼️. This is not isolated‼️. Charlamagne built his brand as “hip-hop’s Howard Stern”‼️provocative, no-filter, willing to ask the uncomfortable question or roast someone on air‼️. He has history with Birdman (“stop playing with my name”)‼️, Drake (ongoing critiques and responses)‼️, Kanye, Nelly, Mo’Nique, and others who’ve checked him or walked out‼️. Some moments age poorly (past transphobic laughter from guests he didn’t shut down hard enough, Lil Mama interview backlash)‼️. Others are defended as necessary pushback in an industry full of yes-men‼️. He positions it as accountability and entertainment‼️. Critics see it as punching down for clips, personal defensiveness when his platform is criticized, or a style that works better on certain guests than others‼️. Stanfield, being more alternative and media-critical, was always going to clash with that energy‼️. Should media “bring a person down” like that⁉️ Media’s job isn’t to protect feelings, but it also isn’t obligated to manufacture humiliation for content‼️. Asking an actor to rap and then publicly declaring him unimpressive is closer to a bit than journalism‼️. Later personalizing it with *Donkey of the Day* segments, old clips, and snitch-role implications turns it into a running narrative‼️. That’s common in personality-driven radio and YouTube-era media‼️it generates conversation and views—but it can feel like the host using the platform to settle scores or enforce a certain vibe‼️. Black media occupies a complicated space: it can hold artists accountable in ways mainstream outlets won’t, but it can also amplify negativity, gatekeep, or prioritize virality‼️
1:30

The 2016 Breakfast Club interview with Lakeith Stanfield set an early tone that later exploded into a years-long back-and-forth‼️. Stanfield, then rising off "Atlanta", *Straight Outta Compton* (as Snoop), and *Get Out*, came on to talk acting‼️. The hosts asked about his rapping (he has a project/group called The Moors and has released music)‼️. He delivered a dense, wordy freestyle‼️. Charlamagne and the crew were visibly unimpressed—the clip they later posted and referenced captures the awkward “that’s it⁉️” energy and some teasing‼️. Charlamagne later framed it as him trying to steer Stanfield: great actor, terrible rapper, don’t waste time on it‼️. In 2018, when Stanfield posted an “offensive freestyle” with homophobic language and a weak apology, Charlamagne replayed the 2016 moment on *Donkey of the Day* and doubled down on the same point‼️. That moment wasn’t the main feud, but it planted the seed‼️. Stanfield is eccentric, artsy, and doesn’t move like a typical rapper or radio guest‼️. Charlamagne’s show thrives on unfiltered grilling, roasts, and “keeping it real.” Asking an actor to rap on the spot and then dismissing it publicly can feel like a gotcha or public diminishment rather than genuine curiosity‼️. How it escalated⁉️ In 2019 Stanfield posted that platforms like The Breakfast Club, The Shade Room, WorldStar, and Lipstick Alley act as “feeding grounds for negative reinforcement toward BLACK ‘nonconformists’” and “slave mentality museums.” Charlamagne took it personally, gave him *Donkey of the Day*, called him a hypocrite for not going after white media (Hollywood handlers wouldn’t allow it), brought up the old freestyle and other interviews, and told him not to call the author of *Black Privilege* anti-Black‼️. Stanfield responded with the diss track “Automatic,” using Sambo-style imagery of Charlamagne and lines like “Insecure, you afraid, you’s a Charlamagne.”‼️ In 2021, during Daniel Kaluuya’s *Judas and the Black Messiah* interview, Charlamagne asked if Kaluuya looked at Stanfield differently because he played the informant “too well”—implying he was born for the snitch role‼️. Kaluuya shut it down immediately‼️. Stanfield called Charlamagne a “hoe” and later posted a video pointing a gun at his picture‼️. Charlamagne said he “owed him that” jab after the earlier shots‼️. This is not isolated‼️. Charlamagne built his brand as “hip-hop’s Howard Stern”‼️provocative, no-filter, willing to ask the uncomfortable question or roast someone on air‼️. He has history with Birdman (“stop playing with my name”)‼️, Drake (ongoing critiques and responses)‼️, Kanye, Nelly, Mo’Nique, and others who’ve checked him or walked out‼️. Some moments age poorly (past transphobic laughter from guests he didn’t shut down hard enough, Lil Mama interview backlash)‼️. Others are defended as necessary pushback in an industry full of yes-men‼️. He positions it as accountability and entertainment‼️. Critics see it as punching down for clips, personal defensiveness when his platform is criticized, or a style that works better on certain guests than others‼️. Stanfield, being more alternative and media-critical, was always going to clash with that energy‼️. Should media “bring a person down” like that⁉️ Media’s job isn’t to protect feelings, but it also isn’t obligated to manufacture humiliation for content‼️. Asking an actor to rap and then publicly declaring him unimpressive is closer to a bit than journalism‼️. Later personalizing it with *Donkey of the Day* segments, old clips, and snitch-role implications turns it into a running narrative‼️. That’s common in personality-driven radio and YouTube-era media‼️it generates conversation and views—but it can feel like the host using the platform to settle scores or enforce a certain vibe‼️. Black media occupies a complicated space: it can hold artists accountable in ways mainstream outlets won’t, but it can also amplify negativity, gatekeep, or prioritize virality‼️

(st_ides)

32,074 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Snoop Dogg has repeatedly described the 1996 Tupac-Nas encounter (around the MTV VMAs in New York, in Central Park or Bryant Park) as a tense moment he witnessed firsthand that nearly went sideways‼️ In his accounts, Pac saw Nas and confronted him about a diss track targeting Nas, Jay-Z, and Biggie‼️. Nas replied that he had no beef, loved Pac, and they shook hands or hugged‼️. Snoop claimed Nas “didn’t want none” but was deep—about 100 guys with guns circling them‼️while Pac remained oblivious‼️. Snoop said he spotted the threat (hands in pockets) due to his “gang-bang mentality.”‼️ Pac walked off thinking he’d punked Nas; Snoop saw it as Nas letting them slide because of the numbers‼️. Both sides handled it respectfully‼️. Nas has countered that Snoop got key details wrong‼️. Nas said he (not Pac) engaged amid high tension after the awards show, partly tied to a run-in involving his brother Jungle‼️. Rumors of Makaveli disses were circulating, and Nas wanted to check the temperature‼️. Their conversation was substantive: Pac thought Nas had dissed him on “The Message”; Nas clarified he hadn’t targeted Pac and had heard Pac was dissing him in clubs‼️. Pac said they were brothers who shouldn’t clash‼️. They planned to continue talking in Las Vegas, but Pac was shot before that happened‼️. Nas described a dangerous situation where greater heads prevailed and mutual respect won out‼️not one side being punked or purely scared‼️. Napoleon of the Outlawz, who was present and close to the exchange, further undercuts Snoop’s version‼️. Nas walked up with a small group (around half a dozen) while the Outlawz/Death Row side was deep (dozens, including New Jersey affiliates; Napoleon carried a .357 and said many on their side were strapped)‼️. Both sides were prepared and violence was a real risk, but Nas approached boldly‼️. The talk was mature and respectful‼️Pac indicated he would remove the diss verses about Nas after returning from Vegas (which never happened)‼️. They shook hands and hugged‼️. Napoleon has stated Snoop was not close enough to hear the conversation or be in the immediate circle; in some accounts he does not recall Snoop being there at all (or places him off to the side at best)‼️. Young Noble (also Outlawz and present) has said the same‼️: Nas walked up, their side outnumbered Nas’s group roughly 30–40 to a handful, the exchange was direct but resolved maturely (Pac sweating, Nas cool)‼️, and Snoop’s retelling is the wildest and most inaccurate‼️. Snoop did not arrive with Pac’s group and may have misread the larger contingent‼️. Snoop was in New York with the Death Row contingent for the VMAs, so he was in the broader orbit, but the accounts from Nas and the Outlawz place him outside the actual circle‼️. This is a clear case where Snoop’s narration did not fully check out‼️. He has told the story multiple times, centering his close observation and the “Nas was deep/scared but restrained” angle‼️, which Nas and those standing right there dispute on initiation, numbers, proximity, and tone‼️. Other instances where Snoop’s recollections have been corrected⁉️: On Drink Champs, Snoop claimed Nas originally had a verse on Tupac’s “Got My Mind Made Up” (All Eyez On Me) that was later removed‼️. Daz Dillinger, who produced the track, corrected him‼️: Nas was never on that song‼️. The original lineup was Daz, Kurupt, Method Man, Redman, Inspectah Deck, and Lady of Rage‼️. Snoop appears to have mixed it up with a different Dogg Pound-related track involving Nas‼️. Outlawz members have more broadly called out Snoop for revisionist storytelling around Tupac-era events, but the park meeting and the All Eyez On Me claim are among the clearest public corrections‼️💯.
4:41

Snoop Dogg has repeatedly described the 1996 Tupac-Nas encounter (around the MTV VMAs in New York, in Central Park or Bryant Park) as a tense moment he witnessed firsthand that nearly went sideways‼️ In his accounts, Pac saw Nas and confronted him about a diss track targeting Nas, Jay-Z, and Biggie‼️. Nas replied that he had no beef, loved Pac, and they shook hands or hugged‼️. Snoop claimed Nas “didn’t want none” but was deep—about 100 guys with guns circling them‼️while Pac remained oblivious‼️. Snoop said he spotted the threat (hands in pockets) due to his “gang-bang mentality.”‼️ Pac walked off thinking he’d punked Nas; Snoop saw it as Nas letting them slide because of the numbers‼️. Both sides handled it respectfully‼️. Nas has countered that Snoop got key details wrong‼️. Nas said he (not Pac) engaged amid high tension after the awards show, partly tied to a run-in involving his brother Jungle‼️. Rumors of Makaveli disses were circulating, and Nas wanted to check the temperature‼️. Their conversation was substantive: Pac thought Nas had dissed him on “The Message”; Nas clarified he hadn’t targeted Pac and had heard Pac was dissing him in clubs‼️. Pac said they were brothers who shouldn’t clash‼️. They planned to continue talking in Las Vegas, but Pac was shot before that happened‼️. Nas described a dangerous situation where greater heads prevailed and mutual respect won out‼️not one side being punked or purely scared‼️. Napoleon of the Outlawz, who was present and close to the exchange, further undercuts Snoop’s version‼️. Nas walked up with a small group (around half a dozen) while the Outlawz/Death Row side was deep (dozens, including New Jersey affiliates; Napoleon carried a .357 and said many on their side were strapped)‼️. Both sides were prepared and violence was a real risk, but Nas approached boldly‼️. The talk was mature and respectful‼️Pac indicated he would remove the diss verses about Nas after returning from Vegas (which never happened)‼️. They shook hands and hugged‼️. Napoleon has stated Snoop was not close enough to hear the conversation or be in the immediate circle; in some accounts he does not recall Snoop being there at all (or places him off to the side at best)‼️. Young Noble (also Outlawz and present) has said the same‼️: Nas walked up, their side outnumbered Nas’s group roughly 30–40 to a handful, the exchange was direct but resolved maturely (Pac sweating, Nas cool)‼️, and Snoop’s retelling is the wildest and most inaccurate‼️. Snoop did not arrive with Pac’s group and may have misread the larger contingent‼️. Snoop was in New York with the Death Row contingent for the VMAs, so he was in the broader orbit, but the accounts from Nas and the Outlawz place him outside the actual circle‼️. This is a clear case where Snoop’s narration did not fully check out‼️. He has told the story multiple times, centering his close observation and the “Nas was deep/scared but restrained” angle‼️, which Nas and those standing right there dispute on initiation, numbers, proximity, and tone‼️. Other instances where Snoop’s recollections have been corrected⁉️: On Drink Champs, Snoop claimed Nas originally had a verse on Tupac’s “Got My Mind Made Up” (All Eyez On Me) that was later removed‼️. Daz Dillinger, who produced the track, corrected him‼️: Nas was never on that song‼️. The original lineup was Daz, Kurupt, Method Man, Redman, Inspectah Deck, and Lady of Rage‼️. Snoop appears to have mixed it up with a different Dogg Pound-related track involving Nas‼️. Outlawz members have more broadly called out Snoop for revisionist storytelling around Tupac-era events, but the park meeting and the All Eyez On Me claim are among the clearest public corrections‼️💯.

(st_ides)

107,629 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Charlamagne tha God built his name on *The Breakfast Club* by being the guy who says the quiet part out loud‼️. He trolls interviews, hands out “Donkey of the Day,” and regularly goes at rappers whose music, attitude, or relationship to the culture he doesn’t respect‼️. It’s not random shade—it’s a consistent pattern‼️. When he doesn’t like someone, he doesn’t just critique the music. He questions their authenticity, their respect for hip-hop, and sometimes their place in it‼️. Post Malone became one of the clearest, longest-running examples of that style‼️. The first major clash happened in 2015 during Post’s early *Breakfast Club* appearance‼️. Charlamagne came in aggressive‼️. He mocked Post’s look (commenting that white people with cornrows look stupid), asked if he was a culture vulture, tried to bait him into saying the N-word, and hit him with “What are you doing for the Black Lives Matter movement⁉️” Post stayed calm and later called Charlamagne a troll whose job is to get a reaction‼️. The interview became infamous because Post didn’t fold, which only seemed to fuel Charlamagne more‼️. Things escalated in 2017 when Post told *Rolling Stone* that if people want lyrics, emotion, or something to think about, they shouldn’t listen to hip-hop—they should put on Bob Dylan‼️. Charlamagne immediately gave him Donkey of the Day, arguing that Post came up off hip-hop (“White Iverson”) and then dismissed the genre that launched him‼️. In the same *Rolling Stone* profile, Post went further: “He’s not a good person‼️. He hates me because I’m white and I’m different.”‼️ Charlamagne’s response was direct‼️. He said he doesn’t dislike people because they’re white—he disliked Post at the time because he thought he was “wack.”‼️ He added that he actually likes “Rockstar” and told Post to keep winning and give back to the Black community in some form‼️. That was his public defense: it wasn’t race, it was taste and perceived disrespect for the culture‼️. He kept it going‼️. In 2020 he told Wallo that if he could kick one person out of rap, it would be Post Malone, calling him a “fake Future.”‼️ He admitted he might just be hating and later walked it back a bit, saying he didn’t even despise him that much‼️. Then in 2022 on *Impaulsive* with Logan Paul, Charlamagne laid out the fuller version of his issue‼️. Post came from hip-hop, got on *Breakfast Club*, then made comments that treated rap like it had no depth or meaning‼️. Charlamagne saw that as hypocritical‼️. He argued hip-hop is nuanced—you can go from Future to Kendrick—and Post’s take felt like someone who only heard the party/lean side of the genre‼️. He even joked about “mayonnaise records.” That interview was him explaining the dislike without fully walking it back‼️. This is the pattern‼️. Charlamagne has checked plenty of rappers on air (Birdman walked out, Master P shut him down, etc.)‼️. With Post it became personal and prolonged because Post represented something Charlamagne has always been vocal about: artists who profit from the culture then talk about it like it’s lesser or disposable‼️. Whether you see it as gatekeeping, hating, or just him being himself, he rarely hides it‼️. He frames it as honesty and cultural protection‼️. Post framed it as a hater who couldn’t stop his success‼️. Both versions have lived in public for years, and Charlamagne has never really pretended he was just being nice‼️.
3:20

Charlamagne tha God built his name on *The Breakfast Club* by being the guy who says the quiet part out loud‼️. He trolls interviews, hands out “Donkey of the Day,” and regularly goes at rappers whose music, attitude, or relationship to the culture he doesn’t respect‼️. It’s not random shade—it’s a consistent pattern‼️. When he doesn’t like someone, he doesn’t just critique the music. He questions their authenticity, their respect for hip-hop, and sometimes their place in it‼️. Post Malone became one of the clearest, longest-running examples of that style‼️. The first major clash happened in 2015 during Post’s early *Breakfast Club* appearance‼️. Charlamagne came in aggressive‼️. He mocked Post’s look (commenting that white people with cornrows look stupid), asked if he was a culture vulture, tried to bait him into saying the N-word, and hit him with “What are you doing for the Black Lives Matter movement⁉️” Post stayed calm and later called Charlamagne a troll whose job is to get a reaction‼️. The interview became infamous because Post didn’t fold, which only seemed to fuel Charlamagne more‼️. Things escalated in 2017 when Post told *Rolling Stone* that if people want lyrics, emotion, or something to think about, they shouldn’t listen to hip-hop—they should put on Bob Dylan‼️. Charlamagne immediately gave him Donkey of the Day, arguing that Post came up off hip-hop (“White Iverson”) and then dismissed the genre that launched him‼️. In the same *Rolling Stone* profile, Post went further: “He’s not a good person‼️. He hates me because I’m white and I’m different.”‼️ Charlamagne’s response was direct‼️. He said he doesn’t dislike people because they’re white—he disliked Post at the time because he thought he was “wack.”‼️ He added that he actually likes “Rockstar” and told Post to keep winning and give back to the Black community in some form‼️. That was his public defense: it wasn’t race, it was taste and perceived disrespect for the culture‼️. He kept it going‼️. In 2020 he told Wallo that if he could kick one person out of rap, it would be Post Malone, calling him a “fake Future.”‼️ He admitted he might just be hating and later walked it back a bit, saying he didn’t even despise him that much‼️. Then in 2022 on *Impaulsive* with Logan Paul, Charlamagne laid out the fuller version of his issue‼️. Post came from hip-hop, got on *Breakfast Club*, then made comments that treated rap like it had no depth or meaning‼️. Charlamagne saw that as hypocritical‼️. He argued hip-hop is nuanced—you can go from Future to Kendrick—and Post’s take felt like someone who only heard the party/lean side of the genre‼️. He even joked about “mayonnaise records.” That interview was him explaining the dislike without fully walking it back‼️. This is the pattern‼️. Charlamagne has checked plenty of rappers on air (Birdman walked out, Master P shut him down, etc.)‼️. With Post it became personal and prolonged because Post represented something Charlamagne has always been vocal about: artists who profit from the culture then talk about it like it’s lesser or disposable‼️. Whether you see it as gatekeeping, hating, or just him being himself, he rarely hides it‼️. He frames it as honesty and cultural protection‼️. Post framed it as a hater who couldn’t stop his success‼️. Both versions have lived in public for years, and Charlamagne has never really pretended he was just being nice‼️.

(st_ides)

25,225 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Did you know⁉️ Vlad and Nore had history before this blew up. Nore sat on VladTV more than once in the late 2000s‼️. Around 2019–2020 he asked those interviews taken down, citing disrespect to hip-hop and Farrakhan‼️. That should have closed it‼️. It didn’t‼️. In March 2024 Vlad flew to Miami and did Drink Champs‼️. The episode did huge numbers — Vlad later cited about 1.9 million views‼️. The deal, as Vlad tells it, was simple: he does yours, you do mine‼️. Dates got booked‼️. Dates got canceled‼️. Vlad says he was already in Nore’s city some of those times‼️. After a year of that, he said it on Akademiks: Nore is a snake, his word doesn’t mean anything‼️. Nore answered on Drink Champs. He didn’t deny the runaround‼️. He said he fronted, he’s grown, he can change his mind‼️. Then he made it bigger than a booking. He said he did to Vlad what Vlad does to the culture. He used the “bent you over” line‼️. He called Vlad a rat over the 2008 Rick Ross case — a civil assault suit after the Ozone Awards, not a criminal charge; a jury later awarded Vlad $300,000‼️. He called him Jerry Springer living off Black drama‼️. Culture vulture‼️. Welcome to the party‼️. Vlad came back with a long Charleston White sit-down: texts, view counts, who owns what (Vlad owns his channel; Drink Champs sits on Revolt), civil vs. criminal on Ross, pressure to drink on camera. He flushed a Drink Champs bouquet in a toilet‼️. That’s when it stopped being about an interview‼️. Nore went to X: “Vladren,” old photos of Vlad in hip-hop clothes, dares about the N-word, an offer to pay for a lie detector‼️. Vlad answered with short clips. One of them, posted September 8, 2026, is titled “The Truth About NORE’s Wife…”‼️ Vlad took Nore’s “I’m protecting Black culture from a white extractor” speech and tried to flip it‼️. The point he made: you talk like a gatekeeper for Black people, but look at who you married‼️. He framed Nore’s wife — a lighter-skinned Latina — as the contradiction‼️. Name, look, the implication that the sermon doesn’t match the house‼️. A lot of people said he reached‼️. She’s Latina, not a white woman in the way Vlad was using the word‼️. Nore has been loud about Puerto Rican roots since “Esta Loca.” He’s mixed himself — Puerto Rican father, African-American mother, born Victor Santiago Jr. Dragging the wife was the cheap shot‼️. Whether it was accurate is a different argument than whether it was the point‼️. By then the original beef was almost gone‼️. It started as “you promised a sit-down.” It became who gets to speak for the culture, who is extracting from it, and whether your personal life is fair game once you make “the culture” the weapon‼️. Vlad used Nore’s own authenticity talk against him‼️. That’s how a canceled interview turned into a wife clip‼️. And we are yet to see how far they can go‼️
2:53

Did you know⁉️ Vlad and Nore had history before this blew up. Nore sat on VladTV more than once in the late 2000s‼️. Around 2019–2020 he asked those interviews taken down, citing disrespect to hip-hop and Farrakhan‼️. That should have closed it‼️. It didn’t‼️. In March 2024 Vlad flew to Miami and did Drink Champs‼️. The episode did huge numbers — Vlad later cited about 1.9 million views‼️. The deal, as Vlad tells it, was simple: he does yours, you do mine‼️. Dates got booked‼️. Dates got canceled‼️. Vlad says he was already in Nore’s city some of those times‼️. After a year of that, he said it on Akademiks: Nore is a snake, his word doesn’t mean anything‼️. Nore answered on Drink Champs. He didn’t deny the runaround‼️. He said he fronted, he’s grown, he can change his mind‼️. Then he made it bigger than a booking. He said he did to Vlad what Vlad does to the culture. He used the “bent you over” line‼️. He called Vlad a rat over the 2008 Rick Ross case — a civil assault suit after the Ozone Awards, not a criminal charge; a jury later awarded Vlad $300,000‼️. He called him Jerry Springer living off Black drama‼️. Culture vulture‼️. Welcome to the party‼️. Vlad came back with a long Charleston White sit-down: texts, view counts, who owns what (Vlad owns his channel; Drink Champs sits on Revolt), civil vs. criminal on Ross, pressure to drink on camera. He flushed a Drink Champs bouquet in a toilet‼️. That’s when it stopped being about an interview‼️. Nore went to X: “Vladren,” old photos of Vlad in hip-hop clothes, dares about the N-word, an offer to pay for a lie detector‼️. Vlad answered with short clips. One of them, posted September 8, 2026, is titled “The Truth About NORE’s Wife…”‼️ Vlad took Nore’s “I’m protecting Black culture from a white extractor” speech and tried to flip it‼️. The point he made: you talk like a gatekeeper for Black people, but look at who you married‼️. He framed Nore’s wife — a lighter-skinned Latina — as the contradiction‼️. Name, look, the implication that the sermon doesn’t match the house‼️. A lot of people said he reached‼️. She’s Latina, not a white woman in the way Vlad was using the word‼️. Nore has been loud about Puerto Rican roots since “Esta Loca.” He’s mixed himself — Puerto Rican father, African-American mother, born Victor Santiago Jr. Dragging the wife was the cheap shot‼️. Whether it was accurate is a different argument than whether it was the point‼️. By then the original beef was almost gone‼️. It started as “you promised a sit-down.” It became who gets to speak for the culture, who is extracting from it, and whether your personal life is fair game once you make “the culture” the weapon‼️. Vlad used Nore’s own authenticity talk against him‼️. That’s how a canceled interview turned into a wife clip‼️. And we are yet to see how far they can go‼️

(st_ides)

45,528 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jon Bernthal says one of the most controversial decisions of his career was giving Shia LaBeouf a platform after abuse allegations because he believed a real friend doesn’t disappear when someone hits rock bottom. “I heard the allegations and I was heartbroken.” “There’s a red line for me. If you put your hands on a woman or a child i can’t be down with you.” “For two years we barely spoke.” “Then I heard he was sober, married, and about to become a father.” “I reached out and said, ‘Maybe it’s time for you and me to have another talk.’” “Everybody around me said, ‘This is the worst idea in the world. You cannot do that.’” “But being a friend isn’t about turning your back on somebody when they’ve done something deplorable.” “Your job as a friend is to make sure they never do it again.” “I didn’t want to exonerate him.” “I didn’t want to save him.” “I wanted to check on him and see whether he was actually doing the work.” “After the episode came out, I got an enormous amount of backlash.” “For the first time as a public person, I experienced real hatred.” “But I don’t regret it.” “I’ve had people reach out saying they were heading down the same path.” “They said hearing that conversation made them get sober, get help, and change.” “There are places that help victims after abuse.” “But who’s talking to the broken young men before they become abusers?” “Who’s telling them, ‘Stop. Get help. Change your behavior before you destroy someone else’s life.’” “I stand by that conversation.”
9:44

Jon Bernthal says one of the most controversial decisions of his career was giving Shia LaBeouf a platform after abuse allegations because he believed a real friend doesn’t disappear when someone hits rock bottom. “I heard the allegations and I was heartbroken.” “There’s a red line for me. If you put your hands on a woman or a child i can’t be down with you.” “For two years we barely spoke.” “Then I heard he was sober, married, and about to become a father.” “I reached out and said, ‘Maybe it’s time for you and me to have another talk.’” “Everybody around me said, ‘This is the worst idea in the world. You cannot do that.’” “But being a friend isn’t about turning your back on somebody when they’ve done something deplorable.” “Your job as a friend is to make sure they never do it again.” “I didn’t want to exonerate him.” “I didn’t want to save him.” “I wanted to check on him and see whether he was actually doing the work.” “After the episode came out, I got an enormous amount of backlash.” “For the first time as a public person, I experienced real hatred.” “But I don’t regret it.” “I’ve had people reach out saying they were heading down the same path.” “They said hearing that conversation made them get sober, get help, and change.” “There are places that help victims after abuse.” “But who’s talking to the broken young men before they become abusers?” “Who’s telling them, ‘Stop. Get help. Change your behavior before you destroy someone else’s life.’” “I stand by that conversation.”

gomi

948,423 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Ice Cube–Mack 10 fallout is a personal/family issue from around 2005 that ended Westside Connection‼️ Westside Connection (Ice Cube, Mack 10, and WC) was formed in the mid-1990s‼️. They first appeared together on tracks like “Westside Slaughterhouse” (Mack 10’s 1995 album) and “West Up!” before dropping the platinum *Bow Down* in 1996 and *Terrorist Threats* in 2003‼️. The group ended shortly after the second album‼️. What started it⁉️ Mack 10 has given the most detail (2010 AllHipHop interview that was later deleted, plus a 2020 VladTV sit-down)‼️. The conflict centered on Ice Cube’s brother-in-law (his wife Kim’s brother)‼️. Mack said the man was disrespectful and “fucked my money up.”‼️ He went to Cube four or five times asking him to handle it internally before it escalated‼️. It eventually did: reports say Mack’s people beat the brother-in-law‼️. There was also an argument that happened in front of Cube’s wife, which Mack believes made the situation worse‼️. Mack’s consistent line: “Basically, I didn’t do anything to him and he didn’t do anything to me.”‼️ He has said if Cube’s wife hadn’t been present during the argument, they might still be making records‼️. Cube has never given a detailed public version‼️. He has only called it “a violation that can’t be overlooked.”‼️ A secondary rumor (never confirmed by either) is that Mack was also upset Cube didn’t want a second tour behind *Terrorist Threats*‼️. Mack owns the Westside Connection trademark because the second album came out on his Hoo-Bangin’ label‼️. Why it has lasted this long⁉️ This is family business, not just two rappers falling out‼️. Cube treats it as something that crossed a line he won’t ignore‼️. Mack has said he tried to resolve it diplomatically multiple times before it blew up‼️. Neither side has made a public move that the other accepted‼️. Cube still works and performs with WC (they grew up around the corner from each other), but not with Mack‼️. Mack has said for years that he “fucks with who fucks with me” and hadn’t spoken to Cube in nearly 20 years as of 2023‼️. That’s now over two decades‼️. In a July 2023 Breakfast Club interview, Charlamagne asked Ice Cube about a Westside Connection reunion after seeing photos of him with WC‼️. Cube’s answer was direct: “Probably not.” “I don’t wanna do another Westside Connection.”‼️ When Charlamagne brought up Mack 10 having told his side of the story, Cube replied, “Of course he do… I don’t wanna talk about it to be honest, because he know what it is.”‼️ Reactions from both sides⁉️ **Mack 10** has talked about it more‼️. In 2023 he told Bootleg Kev he hadn’t seen or spoken to Cube in almost 20 years and wasn’t chasing a reunion‼️. In August 2026 at the Cali Love 3 festival he went further and more positive: he stopped his set to say he still has love for both Ice Cube and WC, calling himself “too blessed to be mad at anybody” and adding “fuck being mad about some 25-year-old shit.”‼️ He was responding to WC having addressed the situation at an earlier Cali Love show‼️. He even played Westside Connection material and invited the crowd to treat it like the group was there‼️. Ice Cube stays reserved‼️. He confirmed in 2023 (Breakfast Club and Cam’ron’s *It Is What It Is*) that there is a real problem with Mack that he considers a violation he cannot overlook, while emphasizing he has no issues with WC‼️. He has shown no public interest in a reunion and has moved on to other projects (Mount Westmore with Snoop, E-40, and Too $hort; Big3 basketball; films)‼️. *WC* has stayed with Cube‼️. He has described it as “real life behind the music” being different from the records‼️. Fans still want the group back and often call the situation petty after this many years, but Cube has not budged and Mack’s recent comments, while warmer, have not produced any joint appearance or statement from Cube’s side‼️. As of now there is no reconciliation‼️💯.
1:04

The Ice Cube–Mack 10 fallout is a personal/family issue from around 2005 that ended Westside Connection‼️ Westside Connection (Ice Cube, Mack 10, and WC) was formed in the mid-1990s‼️. They first appeared together on tracks like “Westside Slaughterhouse” (Mack 10’s 1995 album) and “West Up!” before dropping the platinum *Bow Down* in 1996 and *Terrorist Threats* in 2003‼️. The group ended shortly after the second album‼️. What started it⁉️ Mack 10 has given the most detail (2010 AllHipHop interview that was later deleted, plus a 2020 VladTV sit-down)‼️. The conflict centered on Ice Cube’s brother-in-law (his wife Kim’s brother)‼️. Mack said the man was disrespectful and “fucked my money up.”‼️ He went to Cube four or five times asking him to handle it internally before it escalated‼️. It eventually did: reports say Mack’s people beat the brother-in-law‼️. There was also an argument that happened in front of Cube’s wife, which Mack believes made the situation worse‼️. Mack’s consistent line: “Basically, I didn’t do anything to him and he didn’t do anything to me.”‼️ He has said if Cube’s wife hadn’t been present during the argument, they might still be making records‼️. Cube has never given a detailed public version‼️. He has only called it “a violation that can’t be overlooked.”‼️ A secondary rumor (never confirmed by either) is that Mack was also upset Cube didn’t want a second tour behind *Terrorist Threats*‼️. Mack owns the Westside Connection trademark because the second album came out on his Hoo-Bangin’ label‼️. Why it has lasted this long⁉️ This is family business, not just two rappers falling out‼️. Cube treats it as something that crossed a line he won’t ignore‼️. Mack has said he tried to resolve it diplomatically multiple times before it blew up‼️. Neither side has made a public move that the other accepted‼️. Cube still works and performs with WC (they grew up around the corner from each other), but not with Mack‼️. Mack has said for years that he “fucks with who fucks with me” and hadn’t spoken to Cube in nearly 20 years as of 2023‼️. That’s now over two decades‼️. In a July 2023 Breakfast Club interview, Charlamagne asked Ice Cube about a Westside Connection reunion after seeing photos of him with WC‼️. Cube’s answer was direct: “Probably not.” “I don’t wanna do another Westside Connection.”‼️ When Charlamagne brought up Mack 10 having told his side of the story, Cube replied, “Of course he do… I don’t wanna talk about it to be honest, because he know what it is.”‼️ Reactions from both sides⁉️ **Mack 10** has talked about it more‼️. In 2023 he told Bootleg Kev he hadn’t seen or spoken to Cube in almost 20 years and wasn’t chasing a reunion‼️. In August 2026 at the Cali Love 3 festival he went further and more positive: he stopped his set to say he still has love for both Ice Cube and WC, calling himself “too blessed to be mad at anybody” and adding “fuck being mad about some 25-year-old shit.”‼️ He was responding to WC having addressed the situation at an earlier Cali Love show‼️. He even played Westside Connection material and invited the crowd to treat it like the group was there‼️. Ice Cube stays reserved‼️. He confirmed in 2023 (Breakfast Club and Cam’ron’s *It Is What It Is*) that there is a real problem with Mack that he considers a violation he cannot overlook, while emphasizing he has no issues with WC‼️. He has shown no public interest in a reunion and has moved on to other projects (Mount Westmore with Snoop, E-40, and Too $hort; Big3 basketball; films)‼️. *WC* has stayed with Cube‼️. He has described it as “real life behind the music” being different from the records‼️. Fans still want the group back and often call the situation petty after this many years, but Cube has not budged and Mack’s recent comments, while warmer, have not produced any joint appearance or statement from Cube’s side‼️. As of now there is no reconciliation‼️💯.

(st_ides)

89,219 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

‼️EXPOSED: Nick Shirley Caught LYING About Being In New York On The DAY Charlie Was Assassinated — Which BLOWS UP Andrew Kolvet's Alibi 😱 Nick Shirley was not in New York City on September 10th. He was in Utah. A video he posted from the Orem train station that same day captures the ticket agent announcing the location over the PA system in the background, placing him near the scene of the assassination. The next day, September 11th, he filmed himself at Salt Lake City International Airport. The scenery outside the window matches exact public photos of that airport terminal. Both clips destroy his repeated claim that he had already returned to New York and that the segment he did with Andrew Kolvet on The Charlie Kirk Show that morning was live. If Nick was still in Utah on both the 10th and the 11th, the interview could not have been live. That removes the only real-time alibi Andrew Kolvet has offered for his movements that day. It also raises more questions about Nick’s own story. He claimed Charlie texted him the night of the 9th inviting him onto the show on Thursday the 11th, and that he had originally planned to livestream the UVU event in person before last-minute obligations forced him to New York. Charlie himself was scheduled to appear at Charis Bible College in Colorado on the 11th. So why would Charlie be trying to get Nick to come on his show and do an interview with him on a day Charlie himself had a prior obligation? The partial text screenshot Nick released leaves out the full conversation. Also in the September 10th train station video, Nick was already pushing the fedslop narrative that radical left and Antifa were responsible for Charlie's death — even before a single fact about the shooter or motive was public. I can now confidently state that i believe that Nick was inserted into the CK timeline to sell the official fedslop story to Gen Z that “crazy leftists” killed Charlie, long before any evidence supported it as well as to help create an fake alibi for Andrew Kolvet. That is not organic journalism. That is a jacketed asset doing exactly what he was put there to do. The official story is collapsing under the weight of the evidence. Receipts matter. Locations matter. Timelines matter. Do your own research, trust your instinct and believe what your own eyes are telling you. Do not blindly follow whatever your favorite podcaster is tells you. Shoutout to my amazing researcher KK for helping me research and put together this story. This gal is the best and you guys definitely want to be following her. CC: Nick shirley Candace Owens
25:10

‼️EXPOSED: Nick Shirley Caught LYING About Being In New York On The DAY Charlie Was Assassinated — Which BLOWS UP Andrew Kolvet's Alibi 😱 Nick Shirley was not in New York City on September 10th. He was in Utah. A video he posted from the Orem train station that same day captures the ticket agent announcing the location over the PA system in the background, placing him near the scene of the assassination. The next day, September 11th, he filmed himself at Salt Lake City International Airport. The scenery outside the window matches exact public photos of that airport terminal. Both clips destroy his repeated claim that he had already returned to New York and that the segment he did with Andrew Kolvet on The Charlie Kirk Show that morning was live. If Nick was still in Utah on both the 10th and the 11th, the interview could not have been live. That removes the only real-time alibi Andrew Kolvet has offered for his movements that day. It also raises more questions about Nick’s own story. He claimed Charlie texted him the night of the 9th inviting him onto the show on Thursday the 11th, and that he had originally planned to livestream the UVU event in person before last-minute obligations forced him to New York. Charlie himself was scheduled to appear at Charis Bible College in Colorado on the 11th. So why would Charlie be trying to get Nick to come on his show and do an interview with him on a day Charlie himself had a prior obligation? The partial text screenshot Nick released leaves out the full conversation. Also in the September 10th train station video, Nick was already pushing the fedslop narrative that radical left and Antifa were responsible for Charlie's death — even before a single fact about the shooter or motive was public. I can now confidently state that i believe that Nick was inserted into the CK timeline to sell the official fedslop story to Gen Z that “crazy leftists” killed Charlie, long before any evidence supported it as well as to help create an fake alibi for Andrew Kolvet. That is not organic journalism. That is a jacketed asset doing exactly what he was put there to do. The official story is collapsing under the weight of the evidence. Receipts matter. Locations matter. Timelines matter. Do your own research, trust your instinct and believe what your own eyes are telling you. Do not blindly follow whatever your favorite podcaster is tells you. Shoutout to my amazing researcher KK for helping me research and put together this story. This gal is the best and you guys definitely want to be following her. CC: Nick shirley Candace Owens

Project Constitution

339,346 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

50 Cent put Charlamagne on notice in real time when the Drake Super Bowl talk came up‼️💯. On "The Breakfast Club", 50 dropped that Drake had turned down the Super Bowl multiple times (he and others have referenced two or three occasions)‼️. Charlamagne’s face and immediate reaction told the story‼️he was caught off guard and started trying to reframe it on the spot‼️. 50 didn’t let the pivot slide‼️. He pointed out the obvious: if Jay-Z (via Roc Nation’s partnership with the NFL) was actually offering Drake the stage and Drake was the one saying no, that undercuts the pure “Jay is just hating Drake” narrative that a lot of people lean on‼️. You can’t run the “he’s blocking him out of spite” story and also claim the offers were real without the logic falling apart‼️. 50 checked that framing right there‼️. Then the conversation shifted to 50’s own situation, and he confirmed what he’d said before: Jay didn’t want him on the 2022 Super Bowl LVI halftime show either‼️. Roc Nation allegedly tried to keep him off the bill‼️. Eminem refused to do it without 50, so they had to bring him in as the “surprise.” 50 has been consistent on this‼️he’s said if it was up to them, he wouldn’t have been there‼️. He frames it as culture being competitive, but notes that when it crosses into blocking business opportunities (especially when the other side isn’t even competing for current chart slots or relevance in the same way), it stops making sense‼️. This isn’t isolated‼️. Jay has a track record of using industry position and leverage for personal or competitive reasons rather than pure merit‼️: - The long-running tension with 50 goes back years and has included business and platform issues beyond just music‼️. - Damon Dash has repeatedly accused Jay of interfering in deals and opportunities that would have paid him, describing a pattern of stepping on things when money was on the table‼️. - Historical examples include the way power dynamics played out around Roc-A-Fella splits, artist placements, and access during peak Roc years. Jay has never been shy about leveraging his position‼️whether through labels, streaming (Tidal), sports, or the NFL partnership‼️. The idea that Jay-Z “didn’t play a part” in the Drake–Kendrick situation is pure nonsense‼️. Roc Nation has shaped Super Bowl halftime selections for years‼️. Kendrick getting the 2025 New Orleans slot right in the middle/aftermath of the biggest beef in years wasn’t some neutral coincidence, especially with the cultural and streaming impact of “Not Like Us.”‼️ Jay later claimed it was simply because Kendrick was having a monster year and insisted it wasn’t about the battle‼️. That defense is convenient‼️. When the person controlling one of the biggest stages in music hands it to one side of an active, highly publicized war while the other side has previously turned the same stage down, pretending there’s zero connection or influence requires willful blindness‼️. The power is real, the history of selective use of that power exists, and the Super Bowl decisions sit right in the middle of both‼️. 50’s point lands because he’s lived both sides of it: the competitive culture "and" the business blocking‼️. When Charlamagne tried to keep the narrative tidy in the moment, 50 simply wouldn’t let the contradiction stand‼️. Watch the pattern‼️💯
3:27

50 Cent put Charlamagne on notice in real time when the Drake Super Bowl talk came up‼️💯. On "The Breakfast Club", 50 dropped that Drake had turned down the Super Bowl multiple times (he and others have referenced two or three occasions)‼️. Charlamagne’s face and immediate reaction told the story‼️he was caught off guard and started trying to reframe it on the spot‼️. 50 didn’t let the pivot slide‼️. He pointed out the obvious: if Jay-Z (via Roc Nation’s partnership with the NFL) was actually offering Drake the stage and Drake was the one saying no, that undercuts the pure “Jay is just hating Drake” narrative that a lot of people lean on‼️. You can’t run the “he’s blocking him out of spite” story and also claim the offers were real without the logic falling apart‼️. 50 checked that framing right there‼️. Then the conversation shifted to 50’s own situation, and he confirmed what he’d said before: Jay didn’t want him on the 2022 Super Bowl LVI halftime show either‼️. Roc Nation allegedly tried to keep him off the bill‼️. Eminem refused to do it without 50, so they had to bring him in as the “surprise.” 50 has been consistent on this‼️he’s said if it was up to them, he wouldn’t have been there‼️. He frames it as culture being competitive, but notes that when it crosses into blocking business opportunities (especially when the other side isn’t even competing for current chart slots or relevance in the same way), it stops making sense‼️. This isn’t isolated‼️. Jay has a track record of using industry position and leverage for personal or competitive reasons rather than pure merit‼️: - The long-running tension with 50 goes back years and has included business and platform issues beyond just music‼️. - Damon Dash has repeatedly accused Jay of interfering in deals and opportunities that would have paid him, describing a pattern of stepping on things when money was on the table‼️. - Historical examples include the way power dynamics played out around Roc-A-Fella splits, artist placements, and access during peak Roc years. Jay has never been shy about leveraging his position‼️whether through labels, streaming (Tidal), sports, or the NFL partnership‼️. The idea that Jay-Z “didn’t play a part” in the Drake–Kendrick situation is pure nonsense‼️. Roc Nation has shaped Super Bowl halftime selections for years‼️. Kendrick getting the 2025 New Orleans slot right in the middle/aftermath of the biggest beef in years wasn’t some neutral coincidence, especially with the cultural and streaming impact of “Not Like Us.”‼️ Jay later claimed it was simply because Kendrick was having a monster year and insisted it wasn’t about the battle‼️. That defense is convenient‼️. When the person controlling one of the biggest stages in music hands it to one side of an active, highly publicized war while the other side has previously turned the same stage down, pretending there’s zero connection or influence requires willful blindness‼️. The power is real, the history of selective use of that power exists, and the Super Bowl decisions sit right in the middle of both‼️. 50’s point lands because he’s lived both sides of it: the competitive culture "and" the business blocking‼️. When Charlamagne tried to keep the narrative tidy in the moment, 50 simply wouldn’t let the contradiction stand‼️. Watch the pattern‼️💯

(st_ides)

136,039 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Get Rich or Die Tryin’(released February 6, 2003) is 50 Cent’s (Curtis Jackson) major-label debut and one of the biggest commercial and cultural explosions in hip-hop history‼️💯. The Story Behind the Album⁉️ In the late 1990s, 50 signed with Columbia Records through Jam Master Jay’s development deal‼️. He recorded his intended debut, "Power of the Dollar" (which included the provocative single “How to Rob,” name-checking other rappers)‼️. In May 2000, just before it was set to drop, he was shot nine times outside his grandmother’s house in Queens (including hits to the face, chest, and arm)‼️. The attack was widely linked to his earlier track “Ghetto Qur’an,” which referenced Queens drug figure Kenneth “Supreme” McGriff‼️. He survived but was dropped by Columbia‼️. While recovering, he linked with producer Sha Money XL and recorded relentlessly in a Long Island house/studio that functioned as a safe house‼️. The mixtapes "Guess Who’s Back⁉️" and "50 Cent Is the Future" (with G-Unit) created massive street buzz‼️. Eminem heard the material, flew 50 out, introduced him to Dr. Dre, and they signed him to a roughly $1 million joint deal with Shady/Aftermath/Interscope‼️. Much of the album was cut quickly (some key tracks in intense LA sessions with Dre)‼️. It mixed gritty street narratives, survival stories, and radio-ready hooks over polished production (Dre, Eminem, and others)‼️. Standouts include “In Da Club,” “21 Questions,” “P.I.M.P.,” “Many Men (Wish Death),” “Heat,” and “Wanksta.” “Many Men” almost got cut for tempo reasons until Dre (and Tony Yayo) insisted it stay‼️. The album was rushed out slightly early due to bootlegging fears‼️. It debuted at No. 1 with around 872,000 first-week sales, spent multiple weeks at the top, became the best-selling album of 2003, and has been certified 9× platinum in the U.S. (with global sales estimates around 12 million)‼️. It turned 50 into a superstar almost overnight and helped shift the sound and energy of early-2000s mainstream rap‼️. In August 2023, while performing as a surprise guest on 50’s Final Lap Tour at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, Cole told the crowd: “Get Rich or Die Tryin’ is the best album of all time‼️. I don’t give a fuck what you talking about… It’s "Get Rich or Die Tryin’ at number one and it’s "Thriller" at number two, and I love Michael Jackson.”‼️ Few other major artists have made the exact same absolute “best of all time” declaration in public. Fat Joe has called it “one of the greatest albums of all time” (even while acknowledging past beef that made him initially avoid it)‼️. Nas has praised it as a game-changer‼️. It regularly appears on “best of the 2000s,” classic debut, and all-time hip-hop lists, but Cole’s onstage statement is the clearest high-profile endorsement of it as *the* greatest album period‼️. Jay-Z saw 50’s arrival coming and warned his Roc-A-Fella circle‼️. In a 2013 "Breakfast Club" interview, he recalled telling artists in the studio: “I’m telling you man, y’all got a chance right now to flood it, put out a lot of music, because 50 Cent is coming.” Four months later “In Da Club” hit and “it was over.”‼️ Young Guru (Jay’s longtime engineer) confirmed a similar moment during "The Blueprint 2" sessions: Jay walked in when the whole crew was present and said something like, “Yo, this dude 50, y’all gonna have to deal with him in the next couple months.”‼️ Guru described it as a clear warning that “another power [was] coming.”‼️ Memphis Bleek has also referenced the heads-up‼️. Jay recognized 50’s talent (especially his hooks and intensity) early and treated the impending arrival as an inevitability that his camp needed to respond to by staying active‼️. 50 has acknowledged the story positively, noting Jay knew he would always find a way‼️.
2:30

Get Rich or Die Tryin’(released February 6, 2003) is 50 Cent’s (Curtis Jackson) major-label debut and one of the biggest commercial and cultural explosions in hip-hop history‼️💯. The Story Behind the Album⁉️ In the late 1990s, 50 signed with Columbia Records through Jam Master Jay’s development deal‼️. He recorded his intended debut, "Power of the Dollar" (which included the provocative single “How to Rob,” name-checking other rappers)‼️. In May 2000, just before it was set to drop, he was shot nine times outside his grandmother’s house in Queens (including hits to the face, chest, and arm)‼️. The attack was widely linked to his earlier track “Ghetto Qur’an,” which referenced Queens drug figure Kenneth “Supreme” McGriff‼️. He survived but was dropped by Columbia‼️. While recovering, he linked with producer Sha Money XL and recorded relentlessly in a Long Island house/studio that functioned as a safe house‼️. The mixtapes "Guess Who’s Back⁉️" and "50 Cent Is the Future" (with G-Unit) created massive street buzz‼️. Eminem heard the material, flew 50 out, introduced him to Dr. Dre, and they signed him to a roughly $1 million joint deal with Shady/Aftermath/Interscope‼️. Much of the album was cut quickly (some key tracks in intense LA sessions with Dre)‼️. It mixed gritty street narratives, survival stories, and radio-ready hooks over polished production (Dre, Eminem, and others)‼️. Standouts include “In Da Club,” “21 Questions,” “P.I.M.P.,” “Many Men (Wish Death),” “Heat,” and “Wanksta.” “Many Men” almost got cut for tempo reasons until Dre (and Tony Yayo) insisted it stay‼️. The album was rushed out slightly early due to bootlegging fears‼️. It debuted at No. 1 with around 872,000 first-week sales, spent multiple weeks at the top, became the best-selling album of 2003, and has been certified 9× platinum in the U.S. (with global sales estimates around 12 million)‼️. It turned 50 into a superstar almost overnight and helped shift the sound and energy of early-2000s mainstream rap‼️. In August 2023, while performing as a surprise guest on 50’s Final Lap Tour at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, Cole told the crowd: “Get Rich or Die Tryin’ is the best album of all time‼️. I don’t give a fuck what you talking about… It’s "Get Rich or Die Tryin’ at number one and it’s "Thriller" at number two, and I love Michael Jackson.”‼️ Few other major artists have made the exact same absolute “best of all time” declaration in public. Fat Joe has called it “one of the greatest albums of all time” (even while acknowledging past beef that made him initially avoid it)‼️. Nas has praised it as a game-changer‼️. It regularly appears on “best of the 2000s,” classic debut, and all-time hip-hop lists, but Cole’s onstage statement is the clearest high-profile endorsement of it as *the* greatest album period‼️. Jay-Z saw 50’s arrival coming and warned his Roc-A-Fella circle‼️. In a 2013 "Breakfast Club" interview, he recalled telling artists in the studio: “I’m telling you man, y’all got a chance right now to flood it, put out a lot of music, because 50 Cent is coming.” Four months later “In Da Club” hit and “it was over.”‼️ Young Guru (Jay’s longtime engineer) confirmed a similar moment during "The Blueprint 2" sessions: Jay walked in when the whole crew was present and said something like, “Yo, this dude 50, y’all gonna have to deal with him in the next couple months.”‼️ Guru described it as a clear warning that “another power [was] coming.”‼️ Memphis Bleek has also referenced the heads-up‼️. Jay recognized 50’s talent (especially his hooks and intensity) early and treated the impending arrival as an inevitability that his camp needed to respond to by staying active‼️. 50 has acknowledged the story positively, noting Jay knew he would always find a way‼️.

(st_ides)

55,037 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"I was devastated initially. I met him yesterday and that gave me reassurance..." CNN NEWS18 MEGA EXCLUSIVE. CAPTAIN SMIT MACHCHHAR'S WIFE SONAL SPEAKS TO MANOJ GUPTA FIGHTS BACK THE EMOTIONS TO THANK THOSE WHO ARE PRAYING FOR HER HUSBAND'S RECOVERY. Here is the transcript and the audio. Joining me now is Sonal Machhar. Thank you for speaking to CNN-IBN, Madam. This is your first interview with the media. Mr. Machhar has spoken to Prime Minister Modi. What is your take on that? SONAL MACHHAR: We are very delighted that PM Modi has taken out time to speak to Smith. We are immensely proud of Smith and of what he has done. INTERVIEWER: My first question, Madam: How is Mr. Machhar recovering? SONAL MACHHAR: He is doing well. INTERVIEWER: Did he narrate what happened? And is he in the right frame of mind to talk normally about the incident? SONAL MACHHAR: No, we haven't asked him anything because, right now, we don't want him to get flashbacks of the incident. We want him to fully recover. I'm sure that once he is in the right space to talk, he will share with everyone how the incident unfolded. INTERVIEWER: What was your frame of mind when you got to know about everything and received the first call from the Indian officials? SONAL MACHHAR: I was very devastated, and I didn't have the mental capacity to understand how I should react. But I had my friends and family around me, and I was reassured that everything was okay. Very soon, I started getting news that he was stable. I met him yesterday, and that gave me reassurance that he is in the right hands and receiving very good care from the UAE doctors and military doctors. I'm just hoping that he comes back home soon, and I'm going to do everything it takes for his recovery. INTERVIEWER: PM Modi has spoken to your in-laws as well. He said that he spoke to Bhupendra Bhai and Gita Ben. What does that personal assurance mean to you and your family? SONAL MACHHAR: It means everything. It means everything. Which PM of which country would do this for a normal citizen? So I'm very thankful to PM Modi for calling us. INTERVIEWER: Mr. Machhar is now being seen as a national pride. Not only in India, Israelis are talking about him in a big way. What is your message to the people of India and the people of Israel? SONAL MACHHAR: To the Indians, I'm extremely thankful for all the prayers. I have been following the news, and I am getting so many messages that people are praying, that the whole nation is praying for Smith's recovery. I'm overwhelmed. I really have no right words to express how I can thank everyone. I'm speechless. But I'm just so grateful to God that he's been saved, and that everyone on the plane has been saved. INTERVIEWER: Mr. Netanyahu is very keen to talk to Mr. Machhar, and he has been speaking about him publicly. Israeli people are also talking about Mr. Machhar. What is your state of mind? Will you be able to speak to Mr. Netanyahu soon? SONAL MACHHAR: I will not be able to talk to Mr. Netanyahu. I think Smith is the right person. He should answer Mr. Netanyahu, and he will definitely talk to him once he is in the right frame of mind. And, Mr. Manoj, I think I have answered almost all your questions, and now I need to be with my family. INTERVIEWER: Okay, Madam. Thank you. Madam, thank you. It was very kind of you. I am really grateful. Thank you. SONAL MACHHAR: Yes.
3:54

"I was devastated initially. I met him yesterday and that gave me reassurance..." CNN NEWS18 MEGA EXCLUSIVE. CAPTAIN SMIT MACHCHHAR'S WIFE SONAL SPEAKS TO MANOJ GUPTA FIGHTS BACK THE EMOTIONS TO THANK THOSE WHO ARE PRAYING FOR HER HUSBAND'S RECOVERY. Here is the transcript and the audio. Joining me now is Sonal Machhar. Thank you for speaking to CNN-IBN, Madam. This is your first interview with the media. Mr. Machhar has spoken to Prime Minister Modi. What is your take on that? SONAL MACHHAR: We are very delighted that PM Modi has taken out time to speak to Smith. We are immensely proud of Smith and of what he has done. INTERVIEWER: My first question, Madam: How is Mr. Machhar recovering? SONAL MACHHAR: He is doing well. INTERVIEWER: Did he narrate what happened? And is he in the right frame of mind to talk normally about the incident? SONAL MACHHAR: No, we haven't asked him anything because, right now, we don't want him to get flashbacks of the incident. We want him to fully recover. I'm sure that once he is in the right space to talk, he will share with everyone how the incident unfolded. INTERVIEWER: What was your frame of mind when you got to know about everything and received the first call from the Indian officials? SONAL MACHHAR: I was very devastated, and I didn't have the mental capacity to understand how I should react. But I had my friends and family around me, and I was reassured that everything was okay. Very soon, I started getting news that he was stable. I met him yesterday, and that gave me reassurance that he is in the right hands and receiving very good care from the UAE doctors and military doctors. I'm just hoping that he comes back home soon, and I'm going to do everything it takes for his recovery. INTERVIEWER: PM Modi has spoken to your in-laws as well. He said that he spoke to Bhupendra Bhai and Gita Ben. What does that personal assurance mean to you and your family? SONAL MACHHAR: It means everything. It means everything. Which PM of which country would do this for a normal citizen? So I'm very thankful to PM Modi for calling us. INTERVIEWER: Mr. Machhar is now being seen as a national pride. Not only in India, Israelis are talking about him in a big way. What is your message to the people of India and the people of Israel? SONAL MACHHAR: To the Indians, I'm extremely thankful for all the prayers. I have been following the news, and I am getting so many messages that people are praying, that the whole nation is praying for Smith's recovery. I'm overwhelmed. I really have no right words to express how I can thank everyone. I'm speechless. But I'm just so grateful to God that he's been saved, and that everyone on the plane has been saved. INTERVIEWER: Mr. Netanyahu is very keen to talk to Mr. Machhar, and he has been speaking about him publicly. Israeli people are also talking about Mr. Machhar. What is your state of mind? Will you be able to speak to Mr. Netanyahu soon? SONAL MACHHAR: I will not be able to talk to Mr. Netanyahu. I think Smith is the right person. He should answer Mr. Netanyahu, and he will definitely talk to him once he is in the right frame of mind. And, Mr. Manoj, I think I have answered almost all your questions, and now I need to be with my family. INTERVIEWER: Okay, Madam. Thank you. Madam, thank you. It was very kind of you. I am really grateful. Thank you. SONAL MACHHAR: Yes.

Rahul Shivshankar

120,874 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Times Are Definitely Changing ‼️ This Video Of An American Citizen Opposing Sending His Daughter To Die For The Elite’s Wars Has BLOWN UP, Over 1.4 Million Likes In Just A Couple Days This is a MUST LISTEN. This has really resonated with people to explode & go this viral “Let me get this right. You wanna pass a law to draft my daughter to send to another one of your foreign ****** wars for something you created so your arms manufacturers can make more money for your banker friends. Did I get that ****** solid right or not? Now wrong elephant breath. My daughter will not be joining the military any way, shape, or form unless it's to fight this ****** war that this government has started against its people. See how simple that is? The very fact that you don't understand the societal ****** rules about women and children, let me school you a little bit. Now the fact of the matter is you can't make your fucking recruitment numbers because your recruiters told so many lies like, oh, yes. You get the condo on the beach when you join up. Oh, you get to start here, but we're gonna switch you to what you really want later. And the biggest ****** up the ******, the VA will take care of you if you got hurt. Hey. The reason you can't meet the recruitment goals is because these young men have already voted with their ****** feet. They're not gonna ****** fight. And the fact that you think you're gonna get the women to fight, let me put it to you this way. It was one thing when you oppressed us with unbelievable ****** taxes. One thing, because we were living in nice homes and still eating pretty good. It's another thing when you spied on us to the degree that you did and made us realize that we don't have any freedom. It's another thing when you not only wrecked the ****** economy, but you fucking did it in such a way where you spent so much ****** money that went to special interest groups that the people never had a chance to benefit from it. And now when you have people that are homeless eating canned goods out of the back of their ****** car? You know what? They may do that for themselves, but they're not their kids are not gonna go through that. ******, you're gonna find out what people will do for their ****** children. You protect women and children because it's a societal norm. It has nothing to do with being sexist or unequal in any way. The fact is you should always protect people that are weaker themselves and always stand up for the right ****** thing. And the right ****** thing here is if my daughter is gonna be in a war, she's not gonna have to go to a ****** foreign country to fight it. ****** your taxes, ****** your withholding. ****** your FEMA. ****** your IRS. ****** you. ****** your corrupt congress. ****** your corrupt presidents. ****** your entire election process. You know, I could go on forever, but let's face it. The world's not gonna live that long before a fucking meteor solves a problem for us. So ****** you. And if anybody doesn't like what I'm saying, you know what you can do. If you do like what I'm saying, give me a hell yeah in the comments because our women aren't gonna fight a ****** war for some ****** corrupt government”
2:30

Times Are Definitely Changing ‼️ This Video Of An American Citizen Opposing Sending His Daughter To Die For The Elite’s Wars Has BLOWN UP, Over 1.4 Million Likes In Just A Couple Days This is a MUST LISTEN. This has really resonated with people to explode & go this viral “Let me get this right. You wanna pass a law to draft my daughter to send to another one of your foreign ****** wars for something you created so your arms manufacturers can make more money for your banker friends. Did I get that ****** solid right or not? Now wrong elephant breath. My daughter will not be joining the military any way, shape, or form unless it's to fight this ****** war that this government has started against its people. See how simple that is? The very fact that you don't understand the societal ****** rules about women and children, let me school you a little bit. Now the fact of the matter is you can't make your fucking recruitment numbers because your recruiters told so many lies like, oh, yes. You get the condo on the beach when you join up. Oh, you get to start here, but we're gonna switch you to what you really want later. And the biggest ****** up the ******, the VA will take care of you if you got hurt. Hey. The reason you can't meet the recruitment goals is because these young men have already voted with their ****** feet. They're not gonna ****** fight. And the fact that you think you're gonna get the women to fight, let me put it to you this way. It was one thing when you oppressed us with unbelievable ****** taxes. One thing, because we were living in nice homes and still eating pretty good. It's another thing when you spied on us to the degree that you did and made us realize that we don't have any freedom. It's another thing when you not only wrecked the ****** economy, but you fucking did it in such a way where you spent so much ****** money that went to special interest groups that the people never had a chance to benefit from it. And now when you have people that are homeless eating canned goods out of the back of their ****** car? You know what? They may do that for themselves, but they're not their kids are not gonna go through that. ******, you're gonna find out what people will do for their ****** children. You protect women and children because it's a societal norm. It has nothing to do with being sexist or unequal in any way. The fact is you should always protect people that are weaker themselves and always stand up for the right ****** thing. And the right ****** thing here is if my daughter is gonna be in a war, she's not gonna have to go to a ****** foreign country to fight it. ****** your taxes, ****** your withholding. ****** your FEMA. ****** your IRS. ****** you. ****** your corrupt congress. ****** your corrupt presidents. ****** your entire election process. You know, I could go on forever, but let's face it. The world's not gonna live that long before a fucking meteor solves a problem for us. So ****** you. And if anybody doesn't like what I'm saying, you know what you can do. If you do like what I'm saying, give me a hell yeah in the comments because our women aren't gonna fight a ****** war for some ****** corrupt government”

Wall Street Apes

1,050,341 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

What led to the beef⁉️ In February 2007, 50 Cent was on Angie Martinez’s Hot 97 show and called Koch Records a “graveyard” for artists—implying it was a dead-end label where careers went to die, and that he could effectively shut down projects there‼️. Jim Jones (Dipset) had recently signed/released on Koch and was having success (notably with *Hustler’s P.O.M.E.* and “We Fly High”)‼️. Cam’ron, defending his crew and the label’s relevance, called in (or was put on the phone) and the two went at it live: arguing about sales, industry power, and who was bigger‼️. It turned personal and heated‼️. From there⁉️: - Cam’ron released the diss “Curtis” (mocking 50’s real name, Curtis Jackson, and going at his image/career)‼️. - 50 Cent fired back with “Funeral Music” (and later other tracks), including lines positioning Jim Jones as the new Dipset boss and Cam as demoted‼️. - There were videos, internet exchanges, and more disses‼️. Cam has repeatedly described the whole thing as “fun” and “just music” in later interviews, saying they never had deep personal street-level heat—more competitive industry sparring‼️. 50 has similarly said they wasted time on it due to competitive nature rather than real personal animosity, and they’ve long since reconciled (publicly cool for years, including joint appearances)‼️. During their 2024 interview on Cam’s *Talk With Flee* (with 50 as the guest), Cam brought up the specific move and called it a checkmate‼️. At the time of the beef, Dipset was dealing with *internal problems* that the public didn’t fully know about‼️Cam said nobody outside knew they weren’t fully on the same page, and he was hoping to fix things privately before they spilled out further‼️. 50 Cent then brought Jim Jones and Juelz Santana out on stage at one of his New York shows (Hammerstein Ballroom era references appear in accounts)‼️. Cam said when he saw members of his own group on stage with his opponent, it felt like the situation was spinning out of control: “It was a checkmate moment… This n***a’s devious‼️. But I respected it—I liked that shit.”‼️ He noted he wouldn’t have thought to reach out to someone like Tony Yayo or Lloyd Banks in a parallel situation, and he viewed the move as smart psychological warfare that exploited (and publicized) the existing Dipset tension‼️. 50’s side of the same conversation: He basically threw the invitation out as a calculated shot without being sure Jim would take it‼️. He joked along the lines of “We like Jimmy better than you anyway, Cam,” watched the response, saw interest, and invited him properly‼️. He described it as testing the waters and seeing what happened—Jim “bit.” Tony Yayo and others have separately called 50 a master manipulator who used chess/Art of War-style tactics in beefs, and this fit that pattern‼️. The stage appearance made the Dipset fractures more public and accelerated the perception that the group was fracturing (Jim and Cam’s relationship issues were already simmering)‼️. Cam has framed it in hindsight as an effective, respected chess move rather than pure betrayal talk, though Jim Jones later pushed back on the framing when the interview resurfaced‼️. They’ve long buried it—Cam has said when they finally spoke years later the first topic was getting to the money, and they’ve appeared together since‼️. The whole arc is classic mid-2000s New York competitive rap theater that started over a radio comment about a label and got amplified by diss records and one very public power move‼️💯.
4:00

What led to the beef⁉️ In February 2007, 50 Cent was on Angie Martinez’s Hot 97 show and called Koch Records a “graveyard” for artists—implying it was a dead-end label where careers went to die, and that he could effectively shut down projects there‼️. Jim Jones (Dipset) had recently signed/released on Koch and was having success (notably with *Hustler’s P.O.M.E.* and “We Fly High”)‼️. Cam’ron, defending his crew and the label’s relevance, called in (or was put on the phone) and the two went at it live: arguing about sales, industry power, and who was bigger‼️. It turned personal and heated‼️. From there⁉️: - Cam’ron released the diss “Curtis” (mocking 50’s real name, Curtis Jackson, and going at his image/career)‼️. - 50 Cent fired back with “Funeral Music” (and later other tracks), including lines positioning Jim Jones as the new Dipset boss and Cam as demoted‼️. - There were videos, internet exchanges, and more disses‼️. Cam has repeatedly described the whole thing as “fun” and “just music” in later interviews, saying they never had deep personal street-level heat—more competitive industry sparring‼️. 50 has similarly said they wasted time on it due to competitive nature rather than real personal animosity, and they’ve long since reconciled (publicly cool for years, including joint appearances)‼️. During their 2024 interview on Cam’s *Talk With Flee* (with 50 as the guest), Cam brought up the specific move and called it a checkmate‼️. At the time of the beef, Dipset was dealing with *internal problems* that the public didn’t fully know about‼️Cam said nobody outside knew they weren’t fully on the same page, and he was hoping to fix things privately before they spilled out further‼️. 50 Cent then brought Jim Jones and Juelz Santana out on stage at one of his New York shows (Hammerstein Ballroom era references appear in accounts)‼️. Cam said when he saw members of his own group on stage with his opponent, it felt like the situation was spinning out of control: “It was a checkmate moment… This n***a’s devious‼️. But I respected it—I liked that shit.”‼️ He noted he wouldn’t have thought to reach out to someone like Tony Yayo or Lloyd Banks in a parallel situation, and he viewed the move as smart psychological warfare that exploited (and publicized) the existing Dipset tension‼️. 50’s side of the same conversation: He basically threw the invitation out as a calculated shot without being sure Jim would take it‼️. He joked along the lines of “We like Jimmy better than you anyway, Cam,” watched the response, saw interest, and invited him properly‼️. He described it as testing the waters and seeing what happened—Jim “bit.” Tony Yayo and others have separately called 50 a master manipulator who used chess/Art of War-style tactics in beefs, and this fit that pattern‼️. The stage appearance made the Dipset fractures more public and accelerated the perception that the group was fracturing (Jim and Cam’s relationship issues were already simmering)‼️. Cam has framed it in hindsight as an effective, respected chess move rather than pure betrayal talk, though Jim Jones later pushed back on the framing when the interview resurfaced‼️. They’ve long buried it—Cam has said when they finally spoke years later the first topic was getting to the money, and they’ve appeared together since‼️. The whole arc is classic mid-2000s New York competitive rap theater that started over a radio comment about a label and got amplified by diss records and one very public power move‼️💯.

(st_ides)

148,350 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

😡 NICK FERRARI ERUPTS IN FIERY BUST-UP WITH GREEN ACTIVIST ON LBC! 🔥 Host Shuts Down Interview After Repeated Questions On Israel’s Future Go Unanswered Nick Ferrari grew visibly furious during a live LBC clash with Green activist Ashok Kumar over the party’s new policy declaring Zionism a form of racism. Ferrari pressed him directly: “If you can’t be a Zionist and you don’t believe in a country for Jewish people, what is the future of Israel?” Kumar replied: “This motion is actually about supporting the liberation of Palestine from Israel.” He later added it should be “a country not based on ethnic cleansing and genocide, a country based on equality and justice.” When Ferrari asked where the millions of people currently living in Israel would go, Kumar shot back: “Where do the millions of people being dispossessed from Israel go?” Ferrari hit back: “No! Why don’t you answer my question! Where do they go now?!” Kumar insisted the policy was about the right of return for Palestinians and “got nothing to do with Jewish people”. Ferrari noted that four out of five Green MPs had expressed concern. Kumar answered: “We got this absolutely right.” As Ferrari kept returning to the question of where Jewish people and Israelis would go, Kumar accused him of bias: “You haven’t asked a single question what happens to Palestinians and that’s very reflective. This motion is not about Jews, it’s about Palestinians.” Ferrari snapped: “Mr Kumar, when it’s your breakfast show, you can ask the questions! Currently it’s mine so I will come back to the point. Where do those millions of people go?” Kumar protested: “This isn’t Stalinism, I’m allowed to respond!” Ferrari furiously fired back: “Listen, my dear, I’ve had far better people than you critique my journalism. I’m not gonna take it from you. Just answer the question if you would. Where are those Israelis and Jewish people to go?” Kumar answered again with “Where do the Palestinians go?” At that point Ferrari had finally had enough and shut down the interview. You rarely see Nick get that angry and frustrated. How is this anything but an act of great self-harm from the Greens? They’re a joke anyway, but this policy is just ridiculous and it’s all anyone will talk about now.
3:09

😡 NICK FERRARI ERUPTS IN FIERY BUST-UP WITH GREEN ACTIVIST ON LBC! 🔥 Host Shuts Down Interview After Repeated Questions On Israel’s Future Go Unanswered Nick Ferrari grew visibly furious during a live LBC clash with Green activist Ashok Kumar over the party’s new policy declaring Zionism a form of racism. Ferrari pressed him directly: “If you can’t be a Zionist and you don’t believe in a country for Jewish people, what is the future of Israel?” Kumar replied: “This motion is actually about supporting the liberation of Palestine from Israel.” He later added it should be “a country not based on ethnic cleansing and genocide, a country based on equality and justice.” When Ferrari asked where the millions of people currently living in Israel would go, Kumar shot back: “Where do the millions of people being dispossessed from Israel go?” Ferrari hit back: “No! Why don’t you answer my question! Where do they go now?!” Kumar insisted the policy was about the right of return for Palestinians and “got nothing to do with Jewish people”. Ferrari noted that four out of five Green MPs had expressed concern. Kumar answered: “We got this absolutely right.” As Ferrari kept returning to the question of where Jewish people and Israelis would go, Kumar accused him of bias: “You haven’t asked a single question what happens to Palestinians and that’s very reflective. This motion is not about Jews, it’s about Palestinians.” Ferrari snapped: “Mr Kumar, when it’s your breakfast show, you can ask the questions! Currently it’s mine so I will come back to the point. Where do those millions of people go?” Kumar protested: “This isn’t Stalinism, I’m allowed to respond!” Ferrari furiously fired back: “Listen, my dear, I’ve had far better people than you critique my journalism. I’m not gonna take it from you. Just answer the question if you would. Where are those Israelis and Jewish people to go?” Kumar answered again with “Where do the Palestinians go?” At that point Ferrari had finally had enough and shut down the interview. You rarely see Nick get that angry and frustrated. How is this anything but an act of great self-harm from the Greens? They’re a joke anyway, but this policy is just ridiculous and it’s all anyone will talk about now.

J Stewart

61,587 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Interviewers Crossed the Line With These Celebrities - They Got Shut Down Fast Narrator: Sometimes celebrities just have to put rude interviewers in their place. Like when Matthew McConaughey had a tense face-off with Joy Behar after she interrupted him just to insult his close personal friend, tennis champion Novak Djokovic. Matthew McConaughey: I was happy to be in his box, got to sit behind his parents, which was really awesome to see them when he brings them up from where they started... Joy Behar: Isn't he an anti-vaxxer? I believe he's an anti-vaxxer. Just so you know. Narrator: Things only got worse when McConaughey's political aspirations came up, with Behar nearly derailing the actor's campaign before it even began. Joy Behar: Do you think you can get elected in Texas being anti-gun? Matthew McConaughey: Do I think I could get elected in Texas being anti-gun? One thing about me in politics is, to give you a direct statement right there is to be playing a game that I'm not interested in playing. Joy Behar: Okay, don't answer it. Don't answer it. Narrator: From that moment, McConaughey's aggravation became unmistakable. Much like Tom Cruise's reaction when an interviewer posed intrusive questions about his then-recent divorce from actress Nicole Kidman. Peter: Was Nicole the love of your life? Tom Cruise: What do you mean, Peter? Peter: You were married for 10 years... Tom Cruise: Listen, we raised children... Narrator: After failing to read the room, Peter continued with another prying question, prompting Cruise to decisively shut him down. Peter: And do you have a relationship where you talk... a parenting relationship and talk professionally about each other's work? Tom Cruise: Why don't we—listen. Here's the thing, Peter. You're stepping over a line now. You're stepping over a line, and you know you are. Peter: Well, I suppose those are questions that people want to know. Tom Cruise: Peter. You want to know. Take responsibility for what you want to know. Don't say "what other people." This is a conversation that I'm having with you right now. Peter: You're right. Tom Cruise: Okay? So, I'm just telling you right now, okay? Just put your manners back in. Narrator: Nevertheless, few celebrities have endured greater public humiliation than actress Lindsay Lohan, who was openly mocked about her personal and legal troubles during this widely criticized interview with David Letterman. David Letterman: Aren't you supposed to be in rehab now? And how long will you be in rehab? Lindsay Lohan: Uh, three months. And have been there several times David Letterman: And what how will this time be different? What are they rehabbing, first of all? What are they going to work on when you walk through the door? Lindsay Lohan: We didn't discuss this in the pre-interview! No. Narrator: The actress appeared on the show to promote her upcoming movie, but found herself desperately trying to steer the interview back on track as Letterman persistently made jokes at her expense. David Letterman: You have to be in rehab May 2nd. Are you going to be there? You'll be there, right? Who's taking you to rehab? You don't want to talk about that either, right? Lindsay Lohan: What, no, let's this is we're here for a movie. David Letterman: We have to what? Lindsay Lohan: Let's stay on the positive. Lindsay Lohan: Like aside from that, side of the positive. Narrator: Things got so bad that Lohan was actually on the verge of tears, with her voice noticeably shaking as she struggled to maintain her composure.
3:17

Interviewers Crossed the Line With These Celebrities - They Got Shut Down Fast Narrator: Sometimes celebrities just have to put rude interviewers in their place. Like when Matthew McConaughey had a tense face-off with Joy Behar after she interrupted him just to insult his close personal friend, tennis champion Novak Djokovic. Matthew McConaughey: I was happy to be in his box, got to sit behind his parents, which was really awesome to see them when he brings them up from where they started... Joy Behar: Isn't he an anti-vaxxer? I believe he's an anti-vaxxer. Just so you know. Narrator: Things only got worse when McConaughey's political aspirations came up, with Behar nearly derailing the actor's campaign before it even began. Joy Behar: Do you think you can get elected in Texas being anti-gun? Matthew McConaughey: Do I think I could get elected in Texas being anti-gun? One thing about me in politics is, to give you a direct statement right there is to be playing a game that I'm not interested in playing. Joy Behar: Okay, don't answer it. Don't answer it. Narrator: From that moment, McConaughey's aggravation became unmistakable. Much like Tom Cruise's reaction when an interviewer posed intrusive questions about his then-recent divorce from actress Nicole Kidman. Peter: Was Nicole the love of your life? Tom Cruise: What do you mean, Peter? Peter: You were married for 10 years... Tom Cruise: Listen, we raised children... Narrator: After failing to read the room, Peter continued with another prying question, prompting Cruise to decisively shut him down. Peter: And do you have a relationship where you talk... a parenting relationship and talk professionally about each other's work? Tom Cruise: Why don't we—listen. Here's the thing, Peter. You're stepping over a line now. You're stepping over a line, and you know you are. Peter: Well, I suppose those are questions that people want to know. Tom Cruise: Peter. You want to know. Take responsibility for what you want to know. Don't say "what other people." This is a conversation that I'm having with you right now. Peter: You're right. Tom Cruise: Okay? So, I'm just telling you right now, okay? Just put your manners back in. Narrator: Nevertheless, few celebrities have endured greater public humiliation than actress Lindsay Lohan, who was openly mocked about her personal and legal troubles during this widely criticized interview with David Letterman. David Letterman: Aren't you supposed to be in rehab now? And how long will you be in rehab? Lindsay Lohan: Uh, three months. And have been there several times David Letterman: And what how will this time be different? What are they rehabbing, first of all? What are they going to work on when you walk through the door? Lindsay Lohan: We didn't discuss this in the pre-interview! No. Narrator: The actress appeared on the show to promote her upcoming movie, but found herself desperately trying to steer the interview back on track as Letterman persistently made jokes at her expense. David Letterman: You have to be in rehab May 2nd. Are you going to be there? You'll be there, right? Who's taking you to rehab? You don't want to talk about that either, right? Lindsay Lohan: What, no, let's this is we're here for a movie. David Letterman: We have to what? Lindsay Lohan: Let's stay on the positive. Lindsay Lohan: Like aside from that, side of the positive. Narrator: Things got so bad that Lohan was actually on the verge of tears, with her voice noticeably shaking as she struggled to maintain her composure.

Jeff

90,716 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🎙️ Austin Rivers: "I don't like to give one person all the credit, because it's unity with that team, but Kon Knueppel has raised everyone's play." "My favorite attribute about him is there's no cool in him. He has no cool. He doesn't play cool. There's nothing about him that wants to be cool. He don't care. He goes out there and competes every single game. He plays hard." "Even though he's not a great defender, he tries. He works hard. He plays hard. He competes. He hits big shots. He doesn't have bad body language. When he misses, he doesn't throw his head. He's just solid." "When you talk about LaMelo (Ball) and everything that he brings—he's a little bit more eccentric and all these different things—and Brandon Miller, then you get this kid that comes in here and he's balling his ass off to the point where they're like, 'Hold up, we gotta get our sh-t straight. This guy's f-cking hooping.' And now they're all playing this way, and they're playing the right way." "I saw a play the other day: Knueppel drives, passes it to Brandon Miller. He had a good shot, but there was a better one next to him. Pump fakes, passes. Gives it up. I'm like, that play would have never happened before. They're playing good-to-great basketball now." "The coach, everyone gets a hand in the pot to take credit—I just firmly believe Kon Knueppel, just by example of how he plays and who he is as a person and just how he moves, just being solid and steady around a bunch of guys who were talented as hell and had every tool in the box, but they needed THAT. And I think that's been the biggest surprise." "We were talking about this draft for the All-Star thing, for the Rising Stars Challenge, and I was talking to T-Mac and those guys, and (Carmelo Anthony)'s like, 'I'm drafting Knueppel because I know he's gonna be one of the few guys in the Rising Stars that's not gonna come in here and play cool. He's gonna just compete. That's just who he is.'" "That's why that Duke team was so good—because Cooper's the same way. This draft class has guys who compete; they're dogs. That 'cool' sh-t is like... we got a very exciting young generation of guys who really wanna hoop. Cooper is not like, that dude—half his game is based off motor, you know what I mean? These guys are dogs. VJ (Edgecombe) is a dog." "Like, we haven't had this in—I don't know—the last draft class we've had where I've seen this. So it's exciting, and it's turning teams that we thought were like 5-6 years away—where Charlotte's like, 'Uh oh, here it is, it's coming.' You see it now." "That was the biggest surprise being around them, seeing when the coach would talk, everyone's in the huddle listening, seeing LaMelo direct stuff. I'm like, 'whoa, I've never seen this.' Like, it's happening. It's exciting." Full segment on The Russillo Show: — —
3:11

🎙️ Austin Rivers: "I don't like to give one person all the credit, because it's unity with that team, but Kon Knueppel has raised everyone's play." "My favorite attribute about him is there's no cool in him. He has no cool. He doesn't play cool. There's nothing about him that wants to be cool. He don't care. He goes out there and competes every single game. He plays hard." "Even though he's not a great defender, he tries. He works hard. He plays hard. He competes. He hits big shots. He doesn't have bad body language. When he misses, he doesn't throw his head. He's just solid." "When you talk about LaMelo (Ball) and everything that he brings—he's a little bit more eccentric and all these different things—and Brandon Miller, then you get this kid that comes in here and he's balling his ass off to the point where they're like, 'Hold up, we gotta get our sh-t straight. This guy's f-cking hooping.' And now they're all playing this way, and they're playing the right way." "I saw a play the other day: Knueppel drives, passes it to Brandon Miller. He had a good shot, but there was a better one next to him. Pump fakes, passes. Gives it up. I'm like, that play would have never happened before. They're playing good-to-great basketball now." "The coach, everyone gets a hand in the pot to take credit—I just firmly believe Kon Knueppel, just by example of how he plays and who he is as a person and just how he moves, just being solid and steady around a bunch of guys who were talented as hell and had every tool in the box, but they needed THAT. And I think that's been the biggest surprise." "We were talking about this draft for the All-Star thing, for the Rising Stars Challenge, and I was talking to T-Mac and those guys, and (Carmelo Anthony)'s like, 'I'm drafting Knueppel because I know he's gonna be one of the few guys in the Rising Stars that's not gonna come in here and play cool. He's gonna just compete. That's just who he is.'" "That's why that Duke team was so good—because Cooper's the same way. This draft class has guys who compete; they're dogs. That 'cool' sh-t is like... we got a very exciting young generation of guys who really wanna hoop. Cooper is not like, that dude—half his game is based off motor, you know what I mean? These guys are dogs. VJ (Edgecombe) is a dog." "Like, we haven't had this in—I don't know—the last draft class we've had where I've seen this. So it's exciting, and it's turning teams that we thought were like 5-6 years away—where Charlotte's like, 'Uh oh, here it is, it's coming.' You see it now." "That was the biggest surprise being around them, seeing when the coach would talk, everyone's in the huddle listening, seeing LaMelo direct stuff. I'm like, 'whoa, I've never seen this.' Like, it's happening. It's exciting." Full segment on The Russillo Show: — —

r/CharlotteHornets

128,401 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

lee minho was born to be the leeknow he is. he loves to show off, he loves to attend fashion shows, he loves to get compliments, he loves to show his work and show stays his dancing and cover songs so he could let us hear his voice, without auto tone without editing, just him and his mic. he have said twice that hes only that happy, giggly and chatty only when hes with stays, either during concerts or fansigns. the perfectness in him isnt enough for him and he's gladly working harder for more. he worked so hard even tho he's already perfect and amazing but it just doesn't satisfy him which proves how determined he is, how passionate and loving he is to his career. he lives such a healthy life, very mature mindset and a big love for his career. he loves it, he would love to be included, involved, being filmed and all attention on him. even tho his career has been the most successful, he will always continue on improving and wanting more, his greed and need to grow more and become more and more powerful and talentful always amaze me. im so happy to witness such... fascinating person who worked hard ever since he was a child, different jobs until he found the place that he belongs to. you cant blame anyone who's pointing out this very obvious, hateful and envious mistreatment. i just want to see him shine and do the thing he absolutely love and live for. leeknow's career will always be there in history, i love a man who is very happily doing the thing he always wanted to do. lee minho you will always be loved, cherished and famous. no matter how his own company tries to exclude him out of almost every content they post, people will always talk about him. he will always find himself trending and loved. dont think that he wants to be treated like that, he wouldn't work hard, practice everyday, go to vocal lessons and still try new dancing styles just to be neglected. he would love to be seen, heard, loved, adored, cherished, treasured, respected, noticed, treated nicely, cared for, appreciated, recognized, praised, cheered for and known. please know that you ARE by so many people all around this big giant world. my favorite precious, amazing, loved, hardworking, sweet boy. the love of my life i love you so much 🤍
1:42

lee minho was born to be the leeknow he is. he loves to show off, he loves to attend fashion shows, he loves to get compliments, he loves to show his work and show stays his dancing and cover songs so he could let us hear his voice, without auto tone without editing, just him and his mic. he have said twice that hes only that happy, giggly and chatty only when hes with stays, either during concerts or fansigns. the perfectness in him isnt enough for him and he's gladly working harder for more. he worked so hard even tho he's already perfect and amazing but it just doesn't satisfy him which proves how determined he is, how passionate and loving he is to his career. he lives such a healthy life, very mature mindset and a big love for his career. he loves it, he would love to be included, involved, being filmed and all attention on him. even tho his career has been the most successful, he will always continue on improving and wanting more, his greed and need to grow more and become more and more powerful and talentful always amaze me. im so happy to witness such... fascinating person who worked hard ever since he was a child, different jobs until he found the place that he belongs to. you cant blame anyone who's pointing out this very obvious, hateful and envious mistreatment. i just want to see him shine and do the thing he absolutely love and live for. leeknow's career will always be there in history, i love a man who is very happily doing the thing he always wanted to do. lee minho you will always be loved, cherished and famous. no matter how his own company tries to exclude him out of almost every content they post, people will always talk about him. he will always find himself trending and loved. dont think that he wants to be treated like that, he wouldn't work hard, practice everyday, go to vocal lessons and still try new dancing styles just to be neglected. he would love to be seen, heard, loved, adored, cherished, treasured, respected, noticed, treated nicely, cared for, appreciated, recognized, praised, cheered for and known. please know that you ARE by so many people all around this big giant world. my favorite precious, amazing, loved, hardworking, sweet boy. the love of my life i love you so much 🤍

mimilee

15,900 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

💊 Sometimes, The Truth is a Hard Pill to Swallow 💊 "There's no indication that (firsthand whistleblowers who claim they worked hands-on an NHI craft) are, at this moment, willing to come forward. If people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." ~Corbell (This is not the sensational and misleading "stuff" that tends to go semi-viral in this community. But it's reality. It sucks, but I'd rather hear the truth than have smoke blown up our asses. That's why I asked. Will this post spread like wildfire? Probably not.) "What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen." ~Corbell (the "me" in that quote is not Corbell and is clarified in the full version below.) ~~~ Joe Murgia: "Have you, or do you know of anybody else, who has claimed to have, spoken to the witness I described earlier: Somebody who claims to have worked in a program for a decent amount of time, and who had hands-on a craft, and said, 'Yeah, I worked on it, and my conclusion was, after three years,' or whatever, 'this was a non-human craft'"? Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Yes! I know people in an official capacity who have interviewed with people that exactly fit this description, and I have pushed on them, being like, 'What is it going to take for someone like that to come forward, publicly?' And by the way, that was part of an ICIG investigation where people of that level were communicated with, and I know exactly who is doing that back and forth." (I'd love to know more about that ICIG investigation. Is it related to what Grusch claimed?) Corbell: "And here's the deal, man. They said to me, 'What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen. It just not gonna happen.' (If those folks are sharing that information with Corbell, it appears that it's not classified. So those investigators should be able to tell us what they told Corbell. Will they? Probably not. On the flip side, those people who spoke to Corbell could get around the classified aspect by offering up a hypothetical: "Jeremy, if witnesses like that exist, and have spoken to me, why would they destroy their whole lives and go public? Just because they were told they needed to speak with me? Again, hypothetically speaking.") Corbell: "There has to be somebody who's so upset with something surrounding this, that they're just like, gonna try to burn it all down. And usually those people never make it to the starting point, you know? If they're coming from that attitude. People that work in those programs are so highly monitored with polygraphs, and, you know, their family lives, making sure they're stable. "If you remember, all the way back, looking to Lazar, why did he get not called back for The Program? It was because they found out his wife was cheating on him and he became a security risk. That's how security clearances work, is you have to have a stable family life. So people that would break from the fold, that are feeling all that type of pressure and just try to burn the whole house down? Dude, they're going to find out they're in that mental state way prior to them ever being able to get to the starting point. "So it's a long way to say, yeah, man, the Holy Grail? Yeah, I know about those conversations. I've talked to people on both sides of those conversations." (Both sides to me means that Corbell is saying he DID talk to the people who interviewed the whistleblowers and the actual whistleblowers themselves. That's not the biggest takeaway from what he said, but it would be nice to know if he or George Knapp have spoken directly to those firsthand folks and aren't just hearing it second hand.) Corbell: "The thing is, there's no indication that people like that are at this moment willing to come forward. And in fact - I can't go further than that - but in fact, if people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." (What's changed to where Corbell doesn't think it's possible any more? That's extremely important to know.) Murgia: "And just to be clear, you're talking about other people have had the conversations with those whistleblowers?" Corbell: "Yes." Murgia: "Not you?" Corbell: "Well, what I'm admitting to is that, in official capacity, there are people doing this investigation that have conveyed to me their direct, official debriefing with individuals in those programs. Like, working on the technology, currently. Non-human technology. So I know these people have had those investigatory roles and had those briefings and took the information because of the ICIG, you know, reports." (That makes it seem like it was more than just a hypothetical, which I mentioned earlier.) Murgia: "Cool." Corbell: "Yeah, I wish I could help more on that, guys, you know?" (If you've been waiting for those types of hands-on, firsthand folks to come forward, you need to adjust your expectations after seeing what Corbell said. I have. Some will decide they're tired of waiting and leave this field. Others, who are interested in the phenomenon and not just relying on what happens with witnesses, will always be here. And we still have a hearing coming in September where we will, hopefully, learn new and interesting information from firsthand witnesses who we have never heard from before.)
2:55

💊 Sometimes, The Truth is a Hard Pill to Swallow 💊 "There's no indication that (firsthand whistleblowers who claim they worked hands-on an NHI craft) are, at this moment, willing to come forward. If people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." ~Corbell (This is not the sensational and misleading "stuff" that tends to go semi-viral in this community. But it's reality. It sucks, but I'd rather hear the truth than have smoke blown up our asses. That's why I asked. Will this post spread like wildfire? Probably not.) "What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen." ~Corbell (the "me" in that quote is not Corbell and is clarified in the full version below.) ~~~ Joe Murgia: "Have you, or do you know of anybody else, who has claimed to have, spoken to the witness I described earlier: Somebody who claims to have worked in a program for a decent amount of time, and who had hands-on a craft, and said, 'Yeah, I worked on it, and my conclusion was, after three years,' or whatever, 'this was a non-human craft'"? Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Yes! I know people in an official capacity who have interviewed with people that exactly fit this description, and I have pushed on them, being like, 'What is it going to take for someone like that to come forward, publicly?' And by the way, that was part of an ICIG investigation where people of that level were communicated with, and I know exactly who is doing that back and forth." (I'd love to know more about that ICIG investigation. Is it related to what Grusch claimed?) Corbell: "And here's the deal, man. They said to me, 'What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen. It just not gonna happen.' (If those folks are sharing that information with Corbell, it appears that it's not classified. So those investigators should be able to tell us what they told Corbell. Will they? Probably not. On the flip side, those people who spoke to Corbell could get around the classified aspect by offering up a hypothetical: "Jeremy, if witnesses like that exist, and have spoken to me, why would they destroy their whole lives and go public? Just because they were told they needed to speak with me? Again, hypothetically speaking.") Corbell: "There has to be somebody who's so upset with something surrounding this, that they're just like, gonna try to burn it all down. And usually those people never make it to the starting point, you know? If they're coming from that attitude. People that work in those programs are so highly monitored with polygraphs, and, you know, their family lives, making sure they're stable. "If you remember, all the way back, looking to Lazar, why did he get not called back for The Program? It was because they found out his wife was cheating on him and he became a security risk. That's how security clearances work, is you have to have a stable family life. So people that would break from the fold, that are feeling all that type of pressure and just try to burn the whole house down? Dude, they're going to find out they're in that mental state way prior to them ever being able to get to the starting point. "So it's a long way to say, yeah, man, the Holy Grail? Yeah, I know about those conversations. I've talked to people on both sides of those conversations." (Both sides to me means that Corbell is saying he DID talk to the people who interviewed the whistleblowers and the actual whistleblowers themselves. That's not the biggest takeaway from what he said, but it would be nice to know if he or George Knapp have spoken directly to those firsthand folks and aren't just hearing it second hand.) Corbell: "The thing is, there's no indication that people like that are at this moment willing to come forward. And in fact - I can't go further than that - but in fact, if people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." (What's changed to where Corbell doesn't think it's possible any more? That's extremely important to know.) Murgia: "And just to be clear, you're talking about other people have had the conversations with those whistleblowers?" Corbell: "Yes." Murgia: "Not you?" Corbell: "Well, what I'm admitting to is that, in official capacity, there are people doing this investigation that have conveyed to me their direct, official debriefing with individuals in those programs. Like, working on the technology, currently. Non-human technology. So I know these people have had those investigatory roles and had those briefings and took the information because of the ICIG, you know, reports." (That makes it seem like it was more than just a hypothetical, which I mentioned earlier.) Murgia: "Cool." Corbell: "Yeah, I wish I could help more on that, guys, you know?" (If you've been waiting for those types of hands-on, firsthand folks to come forward, you need to adjust your expectations after seeing what Corbell said. I have. Some will decide they're tired of waiting and leave this field. Others, who are interested in the phenomenon and not just relying on what happens with witnesses, will always be here. And we still have a hearing coming in September where we will, hopefully, learn new and interesting information from firsthand witnesses who we have never heard from before.)

Joe Murgia

53,949 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce