Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Kevin asked the question directly: “Why would a crypto entrepreneur care more about building options than perps?” Nick's answer wasn't simply that options are another way to trade. The bigger argument is that options can unlock an entirely different layer of financial products. “I think the TAM of options...

50,416 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Jedi M@n 🧑‍🦯
The Jedi M@n 🧑‍🦯vor 1 Monat

Ft: @KevinWSHPod × @nickforster

Profilbild von CIP3R
CIP3Rvor 1 Monat

Kevin opened the conversation very well

Profilbild von The Jedi M@n 🧑‍🦯
The Jedi M@n 🧑‍🦯vor 1 Monat

I love his interviews man

Profilbild von Sorena
Sorenavor 1 Monat

Interesting perspective on options trading

Profilbild von Begard
Begardvor 1 Monat

Options could unlock much more than just another trading market

Profilbild von Joe
Joevor 1 Monat

I need to see the full thing

Profilbild von kimoa
kimoavor 1 Monat

The angle here feels distinctive

Profilbild von ABID
ABIDvor 1 Monat

options unlocking a whole new layer of financial products

Profilbild von EKO
EKOvor 1 Monat

options are just perps with a date attached

Profilbild von TUNCAY
TUNCAYvor 1 Monat

Options unlock new financial products and could build a stronger network effect.

Profilbild von Creed
Creedvor 1 Monat

rare to see this level of clarity lately

Profilbild von Rahi
Rahivor 1 Monat

Well said bro

Profilbild von S.O.G.DAO
S.O.G.DAOvor 1 Monat

If options really become bigger than perps, what do you think will drive that shift most?

Profilbild von IGRIS
IGRISvor 1 Monat

that's where the conversation gets interesting.

Profilbild von Rose 🌸
Rose 🌸vor 1 Monat

That's a fascinating perspective on the future of financial products

Profilbild von HLevi
HLevivor 1 Monat

That's a wild thought about options being the building blocks for new financial system

Profilbild von KRYPTON.IO
KRYPTON.IOvor 1 Monat

The bigger thesis isn’t options vs. perps—it’s options as building blocks for a new financial system. Programmability, hedging, yield and structured products could unlock a much larger market. 👀🔥

Profilbild von Jesse
Jessevor 1 Monat

Perps I good yeah, but having Options is far better Thanks for this man

Profilbild von CLAVÉ
CLAVÉvor 1 Monat

I think this is the question every one needs to be asked atp

Profilbild von Ziadul Hasan
Ziadul Hasanvor 1 Monat

Options feel closer to programmable risk than perps.

Profilbild von ƁĘŊŤØ§
ƁĘŊŤØ§vor 1 Monat

Thanks for sharing

Profilbild von yeito.eth
yeito.ethvor 1 Monat

options staying open for months explains why their liquidity can become so sticky positions build gravity

Profilbild von 𝙂
𝙂vor 1 Monat

Options could become much bigger than trading, they might unlock entirely new financial products.

Profilbild von WEB3CULTURE
WEB3CULTUREvor 1 Monat

This is so intriguing

Profilbild von Crypto₿uddie🐼
Crypto₿uddie🐼vor 1 Monat

Enjoyed the podcast

Profilbild von Chan.
Chan.vor 1 Monat

options are the future of finance, mark my words

Profilbild von Kiva 🏴‍☠️
Kiva 🏴‍☠️vor 1 Monat

options are just way more flexible than perps

Profilbild von Devid
Devidvor 1 Monat

because perps are binary direction, options code risk.

Profilbild von Airdrop Hunter
Airdrop Huntervor 1 Monat

Options offer more sophisticated financial product possibilities than perps.

Profilbild von RYZE -`𖹭´-
RYZE -`𖹭´-vor 1 Monat

Liquidity is the biggest hurdle here

Profilbild von The Eddy.eth
The Eddy.ethvor 1 Monat

Your point about options unlocking new financial products is fascinating.

Profilbild von Kong Trading 🦍
Kong Trading 🦍vor 1 Monat

Okay this just about right

Profilbild von riRoyal.Base.eth
riRoyal.Base.ethvor 1 Monat

options as programmable building blocks beat perps long term.

Profilbild von eth⌘ (꧁IP꧂)(✸,✸)⛓(Ø,G)/acc.ink
eth⌘ (꧁IP꧂)(✸,✸)⛓(Ø,G)/acc.inkvor 1 Monat

This is definitely worth following

Profilbild von 0xho3in(❖,❖)
0xho3in(❖,❖)vor 1 Monat

Options really do open up new possibilities in trading. Exciting to see where this goes!

Ähnliche Videos

DROPS 41: Derive.xyz - Why Options Will Beat Perps This Decade Nick Forster | Derive is co-founder and CEO of Derive, the largest on-chain options exchange. Today we get into what almost killed the company, why they rebranded overnight, and why he thinks options - not perps - are the real endgame for on-chain finance. We talk about: - The token playbook that killed 98% of crypto projects - The wedding in Portugal where the whole team almost walked away - Rebranding from Lyra to Derive in nine days - Why options will outgrow perps this decade - What blockchains are actually bad at - Why AI makes options the natural vehicle for agent finance And much more… Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:04 - The Mission Behind Derive 3:00 - What Does Derive Actually Do? 5:18 - Who Actually Uses Options? 7:03 - Nick's Journey Into Crypto 8:09 - The problem with crypto's last five years 11:17 - The token listing playbook 17:44 - Partnership: FortisX 18:10 - The $15M Market Cap Crisis 24:12 - Why Nick Stayed 26:01 - What finally changed 29:38 - Why Options Could Become Huge 32:52 - Options vs Perpetuals 34:37 - Making options accessible to retail 38:36 - Why Derive Rebranded 40:12 - From V1 to V3 46:03 - The Real Power of Programmable Finance 48:19 - What Blockchains are actually Bad at 49:59 - What's Derive bad at? 50:53 - The endgame for Derive 51:47 - What's Holding Derive Back? 52:50 - Why Crypto Builders Need to Stick Together 54:49 - Why Stay in Crypto in 2026? 56:57 - Conclusion

MR SHIFT 🦁

150,446 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Rahul Vohra on how to measure product/market fit Rahul Vohra is the founder and CEO of Superhuman. He was looking for a metric to measure product/market fit so that he and his team could optimize, and he came across the following methodology from Sean Ellis: Simply ask your users: “How would you feel if you could no longer use the product?” with three options: (1) not disappointed, (2) somewhat disappointed, or (3) very disappointed. It turns out that the benchmark for product/market fit across hundreds of venture-backed startups is 40% of respondents saying “very disappointed”. And as Rahul puts it: “If more than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you should focus on growing your company. If less than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you’ll probably struggle to grow.” 40% may not sound like a lot, but it’s an incredibly hard benchmark to beat. For example, Slack posed this to 731 customers early in the company’s history, and 51% said they would be very disappointed without Slack. One might expect a terrific product like Slack to have a score of 60-80%, but that wasn’t the case. Rahul’s explanation of why the response options are focused on disappointment rather than happiness is interesting too: “I think the reason behind that is that if you ask people how they feel about a product and you give them positive potential responses, I think it invites more bias. People are more likely to be polite. And it also doesn’t get to the heart of the matter which is: how necessary has your product become in people’s lives? If you’re trying to build a company that’s going to stand the test of time, you really do have to build a product that matters and that people ultimately come to depend on because it’s just so incredible at what it does. And that’s what this question gets to the heart of.”

Michael McGuiness

67,106 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren