Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🎯 Kiley Grills Berkeley Chancellor: Should Blocking Jewish Students Be Expellable? Rep. Kevin Kiley pressed UC Berkeley Chancellor Rich Lyons on whether physically obstructing Jewish students' movement—as happened at Sather Gate—should result in automatic expulsion or termination. Lyons dodged. “If someone is physically stopping someone from getting onto their... campus because of who they are, that person should be expelled, shouldn't they?” — Kiley Lyons refused to commit. Instead, he floated “tiered responses,” deflections about context, and meaningless investigations—despite claiming there’s “zero tolerance.” Kiley also challenged Berkeley’s decision to reward rule-breaking encampment organizers by endowing a chair now held by Dr. Ussama Makdisi, who has glorified terrorist “martyrs.” Lyons again refused to condemn the past deal—saying only, “I can’t second guess my predecessor.” Weak leadership. No accountability. Radicalism rewarded.show more

Stu

27,048 subscribers

22,314 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

NizNellie3 profil fotoğrafı

NizNellie31 yıl önce

@RepKiley Someone should check the hotel bar where Lyons is probably drinking himself into an antisemitic rage after the shellacking he received today. Some good content after 18 scotch and sodas.

JoAnn Skromme profil fotoğrafı

JoAnn Skromme1 yıl önce

@RepKiley The smugness entitlement and privilege of these universities leaders is astounding.

Sarah Steele profil fotoğrafı

Sarah Steele1 yıl önce

@RepKiley It's wild to me that *anyone* remotely connected to higher education thought it prudent to reiterate this infamous Claudine Gay line ("in depends on the context"). Where has Mr. Lyons been for the past year and a half?

RunTheStairs profil fotoğrafı

RunTheStairs1 yıl önce

@RepKiley Academics endlessly second guess the actions of all sorts of historical figures from 100s of years ago. But, somehow Lyons can't evaluate the actions of the previous chancellor.

West Coast Pelican profil fotoğrafı

West Coast Pelican1 yıl önce

@KevinKileyCA @RepKiley LOL. Are you ever going to have an in person town hall? Why did you vote against the release of the Epstein files?

JL Sherman profil fotoğrafı

JL Sherman1 yıl önce

@RepKiley If people dressed in white hoods, holding nooses & calling for lynchings blocked blacks students from class Richie would not have a moral dilemma about expulsion

Roger Barry profil fotoğrafı

Roger Barry1 yıl önce

@RepKiley This grifter took rhetoric lessons from master Gavin

Alan Brickman profil fotoğrafı

Alan Brickman1 yıl önce

@RepKiley just say yes or no already....

BKG profil fotoğrafı

BKG1 yıl önce

@RepKiley Coward apologists who will one day be eaten by the terrorists they are now enabling.

Jill Escher 🎗️ profil fotoğrafı

Jill Escher 🎗️1 yıl önce

@RepKiley Go go go!

Benzer Videolar

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were filmed assaulting, handcuffing, and kidnapping a U.S. citizen in Passaic, New Jersey… while refusing to even look at the ID he repeatedly begged them to check. A man is pleading with federal agents to verify who he is… And they refused. Instead, one agent says, “We need to get him on the ground,” puts him in a chokehold, throws him to the ground, and multiple agents pile on top of him before handcuffing him, and throwing him into their vehicle. Under the Fourth Amendment, the government cannot arrest, or seize someone, without probable cause that they have committed, are committing, or are about to commit an offense that authorizes the arrest. U.S. citizens are also not required to carry identification unless they’re driving a motorized vehicle. And if federal agents are refusing to verify someone’s identity before arresting them, then they are openly ignoring the constitution. Which should terrify every American. Because that means no one is safe from being kidnapped by the government… and disappeared. Every agent involved should be publicly identified, and DHS should be forced to explain why they believed they had the legal authority to seize someone, while refusing to verify who he was. This cannot become normal.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were filmed assaulting, handcuffing, and kidnapping a U.S. citizen in Passaic, New Jersey… while refusing to even look at the ID he repeatedly begged them to check. A man is pleading with federal agents to verify who he is… And they refused. Instead, one agent says, “We need to get him on the ground,” puts him in a chokehold, throws him to the ground, and multiple agents pile on top of him before handcuffing him, and throwing him into their vehicle. Under the Fourth Amendment, the government cannot arrest, or seize someone, without probable cause that they have committed, are committing, or are about to commit an offense that authorizes the arrest. U.S. citizens are also not required to carry identification unless they’re driving a motorized vehicle. And if federal agents are refusing to verify someone’s identity before arresting them, then they are openly ignoring the constitution. Which should terrify every American. Because that means no one is safe from being kidnapped by the government… and disappeared. Every agent involved should be publicly identified, and DHS should be forced to explain why they believed they had the legal authority to seize someone, while refusing to verify who he was. This cannot become normal.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,111,935 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Police in Brisbane have used force to remove me from a public street, but declined to press charges. I don’t think they want an international incident on their hands. This all happened because a bylaw officer lied and said I was obstructing people’s movement in a public square. All I did, as usual for the past 4.5 years, was stand quietly by myself in the corner of the square, having conversations only with those who approach me. He told me to move and I refused because I know my rights. I’m on a public street and I can have conversations. He then issued me an $806 fine. I gladly accepted it. He ordered me to move again. I again declined. Then the police came. They debated for about 45 minutes what to do with me, before eventually saying I would be arrested and charged if I refused to move. I could not agree to their terms with a clear conscience. I refuse to accept zealous abuse of power by those in authority, simply because I’m peacefully spreading a true message that vulnerable children are being maimed, sterilized, and turned into lifelong pharmaceutical patients. I opted not to violate my integrity, so they physically removed me. I believe they know what they’re doing is wrong, which is why they then opted not to formally arrest and charge me. Much more video to come.

Police in Brisbane have used force to remove me from a public street, but declined to press charges. I don’t think they want an international incident on their hands. This all happened because a bylaw officer lied and said I was obstructing people’s movement in a public square. All I did, as usual for the past 4.5 years, was stand quietly by myself in the corner of the square, having conversations only with those who approach me. He told me to move and I refused because I know my rights. I’m on a public street and I can have conversations. He then issued me an $806 fine. I gladly accepted it. He ordered me to move again. I again declined. Then the police came. They debated for about 45 minutes what to do with me, before eventually saying I would be arrested and charged if I refused to move. I could not agree to their terms with a clear conscience. I refuse to accept zealous abuse of power by those in authority, simply because I’m peacefully spreading a true message that vulnerable children are being maimed, sterilized, and turned into lifelong pharmaceutical patients. I opted not to violate my integrity, so they physically removed me. I believe they know what they’re doing is wrong, which is why they then opted not to formally arrest and charge me. Much more video to come.

Billboard Chris 🌎

1,633,372 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨EXCLUSIVE: I have now completed my review of the University of South Florida investigative file/Police Report and the available video footage. The initial responding officer documented that no physical contact occurred and concluded that, at that time, “there has been no crime committed.” However, as their “investigation” continued, multiple sworn written statements were submitted claiming the defendants, Rich Penkoski, Chris Svochak and Ricardo Yepez, “stomped near the students’ heads while they were praying, causing them to fear they would be struck.” After reviewing the video myself, I found that it does not show anyone stomping near the students’ heads as described in those sworn statements. The video does not show a megaphone at any point. Despite that, the investigative report references the defendants having one. Rich Penkoski told me they never brought a megaphone because they knew it was prohibited. This is clear political targeting. Let’s not also forget that the Muslim students are a part of the Muslim student association which was created by the Muslim brotherhood in 1965 to get a foothold on college campuses (and the Muslim brotherhood is a terrorist organization) I also spoke with Rich Penkoski’s attorney, Jerry Theodorou, who provided me with the following statement: “USF law enforcement’s initial investigation determined no crime had occurred and the case should have been closed out at that point. Instead, this Muslim prayer group decided to recruit their terrorist organization called CAIR by hosting a press conference. CAIR has been deemed by Governor DeSantis of Florida to qualify as a terrorist organization. It was despicable to see USF law enforcement personnel standing side by side with this terrorist group condemning the First Amendment rights of Christians to preach and protest. It was a sad day for this inept law enforcement organization to stoop so low to support a left-wing terrorist organization. It just goes to show you how deeply infiltrated our public university school system is by these left-wing radicals for law enforcement to openly condemn Christians.”

🚨EXCLUSIVE: I have now completed my review of the University of South Florida investigative file/Police Report and the available video footage. The initial responding officer documented that no physical contact occurred and concluded that, at that time, “there has been no crime committed.” However, as their “investigation” continued, multiple sworn written statements were submitted claiming the defendants, Rich Penkoski, Chris Svochak and Ricardo Yepez, “stomped near the students’ heads while they were praying, causing them to fear they would be struck.” After reviewing the video myself, I found that it does not show anyone stomping near the students’ heads as described in those sworn statements. The video does not show a megaphone at any point. Despite that, the investigative report references the defendants having one. Rich Penkoski told me they never brought a megaphone because they knew it was prohibited. This is clear political targeting. Let’s not also forget that the Muslim students are a part of the Muslim student association which was created by the Muslim brotherhood in 1965 to get a foothold on college campuses (and the Muslim brotherhood is a terrorist organization) I also spoke with Rich Penkoski’s attorney, Jerry Theodorou, who provided me with the following statement: “USF law enforcement’s initial investigation determined no crime had occurred and the case should have been closed out at that point. Instead, this Muslim prayer group decided to recruit their terrorist organization called CAIR by hosting a press conference. CAIR has been deemed by Governor DeSantis of Florida to qualify as a terrorist organization. It was despicable to see USF law enforcement personnel standing side by side with this terrorist group condemning the First Amendment rights of Christians to preach and protest. It was a sad day for this inept law enforcement organization to stoop so low to support a left-wing terrorist organization. It just goes to show you how deeply infiltrated our public university school system is by these left-wing radicals for law enforcement to openly condemn Christians.”

Sarah Fields

73,178 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Breaking: Columbia professor Bruce Robbins reveals new details about Columbia's attempt to try to unprofessor him, to "thrown to the lions" in a new interview with Middle East Eye: Bruce Robbins: "Students brought charges against me last spring, basically because I invited my class to visit the encampment on April 22nd…the circumstances were quite special because the class I was teaching was a class on atrocity about which I've written a book…with Stanford University Press called Atrocity… anyway… From the beginning of the of the semester I had put on the syllabus that the last week would be a discussion of atrocity with reference to Gaza I had said that the readings were to be announced TBA & I invited everyone in the class to suggest readings that they thought would be useful for their classmates to read about atrocity as a concept relevant to Gaza since October 7th 2023 I didn't of course know there were there was going to be an encampment and then suddenly there was and on the day when we were supposed to talk about atrocity in Gaza so I said to my class look, under the circumstances it would seem absurd for us not to visit this demonstration which has been put on by your fellow students against atrocity in Gaza when atrocity in Gaza is on our syllabus, but if anybody is uncomfortable I said you should absolutely not feel that you have to come to this class. There will be no consequences uh for you not coming to this class but anybody who wants to go I think it's a very rare historic opportunity for us to take the subject on our syllabus to the encampment which is a few steps away. So, I don't know, maybe half the class came with me maybe a little more... Two students who are anonymous to shield them from retaliation brought charges is that I had interfered with their equal opportunity to get an education by inviting the class to the encampment and those charges are still pending. And with everything that's happening on the Colombia campus I had went through two hearings I brought a lawyer they asked me all kinds of questions I know that they interviewed for hours students from my class um I'm waiting to hear whether I will be another person thrown to the lions as it were where they can say …he took his students to the encampment and we are going to punish him for this somehow i have no idea i'm I am awaiting judgment as we speak.” Mohamed Hashem : “Is this the first day you're speaking about this professor?” Bruce Robbins: “Well I mean you mean in public yeah publicly…yeah I suppose I haven't that's true.” Professor Robbins should win a teaching award for this. Instead, he's being treated like a criminal. Columbia University is toxic. What an absolute disgrace of an institution. Full interview here:

Breaking: Columbia professor Bruce Robbins reveals new details about Columbia's attempt to try to unprofessor him, to "thrown to the lions" in a new interview with Middle East Eye: Bruce Robbins: "Students brought charges against me last spring, basically because I invited my class to visit the encampment on April 22nd…the circumstances were quite special because the class I was teaching was a class on atrocity about which I've written a book…with Stanford University Press called Atrocity… anyway… From the beginning of the of the semester I had put on the syllabus that the last week would be a discussion of atrocity with reference to Gaza I had said that the readings were to be announced TBA & I invited everyone in the class to suggest readings that they thought would be useful for their classmates to read about atrocity as a concept relevant to Gaza since October 7th 2023 I didn't of course know there were there was going to be an encampment and then suddenly there was and on the day when we were supposed to talk about atrocity in Gaza so I said to my class look, under the circumstances it would seem absurd for us not to visit this demonstration which has been put on by your fellow students against atrocity in Gaza when atrocity in Gaza is on our syllabus, but if anybody is uncomfortable I said you should absolutely not feel that you have to come to this class. There will be no consequences uh for you not coming to this class but anybody who wants to go I think it's a very rare historic opportunity for us to take the subject on our syllabus to the encampment which is a few steps away. So, I don't know, maybe half the class came with me maybe a little more... Two students who are anonymous to shield them from retaliation brought charges is that I had interfered with their equal opportunity to get an education by inviting the class to the encampment and those charges are still pending. And with everything that's happening on the Colombia campus I had went through two hearings I brought a lawyer they asked me all kinds of questions I know that they interviewed for hours students from my class um I'm waiting to hear whether I will be another person thrown to the lions as it were where they can say …he took his students to the encampment and we are going to punish him for this somehow i have no idea i'm I am awaiting judgment as we speak.” Mohamed Hashem : “Is this the first day you're speaking about this professor?” Bruce Robbins: “Well I mean you mean in public yeah publicly…yeah I suppose I haven't that's true.” Professor Robbins should win a teaching award for this. Instead, he's being treated like a criminal. Columbia University is toxic. What an absolute disgrace of an institution. Full interview here:

Zachary Foster

208,695 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Anti-Israel protests bring vandalism and chaos to McGill University McGill grappled with vandalism and class disruptions during the three-day anti-Israel strike, leading to the termination of the Student Union's contract. Since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, McGill University has been a cauldron of unrest, with Jewish students enduring harassment, stalking, and targeted intimidation. The campus, once a symbol of academic prestige, has been marred by radical activism, including a 75-day anti-Israel encampment that forced McGill to relocate its graduation ceremonies. Graffiti, vandalism, and a building occupation with barricades have fueled a growing sense of insecurity. Last week, a chaotic three-day strike, backed at least implicitly by the Student Society of McGill University (SSMU), disrupted dozens of classes and left students feeling threatened. Professor Angela Campbell’s letter criticized SSMU’s leadership for failing to distance itself from groups glorifying vandalism and obstruction as activism. The university’s response—cutting ties with SSMU—came after a shocking incident where a protester with a fire extinguisher loaded with red paint sprayed inside an office and smashed a window glass door. Amanda, a McGill student who witnessed the turmoil, recounted the scene to Rebel News: “Basically, campus was completely taken over by protesters from McGill, also from outside. Classes were blocked, students were physically assaulted, there was a mob as well on Thursday, so campus was a complete mess for those three days.” Amanda described a terrifying moment in the administration building: “They surrounded the exit. So riot police and security had to come and, you know, block them obviously from entering. So it was pretty scary. I had to be moved to the side by the riot police.” She expressed dismay at the lack of consequences: “I’ve asked administration if they intended to make expulsions or discipline these students, and they can’t really give a straight answer.” With no arrests reported and mediation talks with SSMU underway, many students feel the university’s actions are too little, too late. Jewish students, alongside others—Chinese, Italian, Greek, Black—report feeling unsafe, their rights trampled. Amanda voiced their exasperation: “We’re really fed up. Our rights are being infringed upon. This isn’t a safe place for Jewish students anymore, or honestly, any other students.” As McGill grapples with its next steps, the campus remains a tinderbox, with fears that unchecked escalation could spark worse to come.

Anti-Israel protests bring vandalism and chaos to McGill University McGill grappled with vandalism and class disruptions during the three-day anti-Israel strike, leading to the termination of the Student Union's contract. Since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, McGill University has been a cauldron of unrest, with Jewish students enduring harassment, stalking, and targeted intimidation. The campus, once a symbol of academic prestige, has been marred by radical activism, including a 75-day anti-Israel encampment that forced McGill to relocate its graduation ceremonies. Graffiti, vandalism, and a building occupation with barricades have fueled a growing sense of insecurity. Last week, a chaotic three-day strike, backed at least implicitly by the Student Society of McGill University (SSMU), disrupted dozens of classes and left students feeling threatened. Professor Angela Campbell’s letter criticized SSMU’s leadership for failing to distance itself from groups glorifying vandalism and obstruction as activism. The university’s response—cutting ties with SSMU—came after a shocking incident where a protester with a fire extinguisher loaded with red paint sprayed inside an office and smashed a window glass door. Amanda, a McGill student who witnessed the turmoil, recounted the scene to Rebel News: “Basically, campus was completely taken over by protesters from McGill, also from outside. Classes were blocked, students were physically assaulted, there was a mob as well on Thursday, so campus was a complete mess for those three days.” Amanda described a terrifying moment in the administration building: “They surrounded the exit. So riot police and security had to come and, you know, block them obviously from entering. So it was pretty scary. I had to be moved to the side by the riot police.” She expressed dismay at the lack of consequences: “I’ve asked administration if they intended to make expulsions or discipline these students, and they can’t really give a straight answer.” With no arrests reported and mediation talks with SSMU underway, many students feel the university’s actions are too little, too late. Jewish students, alongside others—Chinese, Italian, Greek, Black—report feeling unsafe, their rights trampled. Amanda voiced their exasperation: “We’re really fed up. Our rights are being infringed upon. This isn’t a safe place for Jewish students anymore, or honestly, any other students.” As McGill grapples with its next steps, the campus remains a tinderbox, with fears that unchecked escalation could spark worse to come.

Alexandra Lavoie

29,193 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Woke principal targets coaches and students for not bending knee to trans ideology Here in Sylvan Lake, Alberta, another support for students has been cancelled. That is, Coach Taylor “Teej” Johannesson of H.J. Cody High School. He was let go from the volunteer position he has held for over 10 years, simply because he expressed concern online about how transgender ideology is affecting young people. Yes, that's right — criticizing an idea is what got him removed from his long-held role as coach. Consequently, the school and district received dozens of emails from concerned parents, students, other teachers and others who expressed their upset at the decision by the principal and the district in removing Coach Teej. The team here is not only down one coach, but down two coaches out of four, after a second coach decided to step away from his position in protest of the district and principal's decision to let Coach Teej go. In response to the community's concerns, one of the teachers at the school decided it would be appropriate to email students and tell them to “stay out of this.” I was informed that Principal Alex Lambert then began hunting down students who had emailed to express their concerns, now that school has resumed. She even went so far as to corner an autistic student in an office to pressure them into changing their perspective on the situation. A stark difference from helping the student get the classroom support they were in the office for in the first place. We did reach out to the principal; in fact, I visited her while in town. She refused to comment on the situation. School district officials say they are investigating but pointed to Section 33(d) of the Education Act to suggest wrongdoing by the coach. I then asked whether or not they had now infringed upon this section of the act by letting him go, only to receive no response. We emailed the province, but they remained silent as well, citing the district's investigation. REPORT by Syd Fizzard 🍁:

Woke principal targets coaches and students for not bending knee to trans ideology Here in Sylvan Lake, Alberta, another support for students has been cancelled. That is, Coach Taylor “Teej” Johannesson of H.J. Cody High School. He was let go from the volunteer position he has held for over 10 years, simply because he expressed concern online about how transgender ideology is affecting young people. Yes, that's right — criticizing an idea is what got him removed from his long-held role as coach. Consequently, the school and district received dozens of emails from concerned parents, students, other teachers and others who expressed their upset at the decision by the principal and the district in removing Coach Teej. The team here is not only down one coach, but down two coaches out of four, after a second coach decided to step away from his position in protest of the district and principal's decision to let Coach Teej go. In response to the community's concerns, one of the teachers at the school decided it would be appropriate to email students and tell them to “stay out of this.” I was informed that Principal Alex Lambert then began hunting down students who had emailed to express their concerns, now that school has resumed. She even went so far as to corner an autistic student in an office to pressure them into changing their perspective on the situation. A stark difference from helping the student get the classroom support they were in the office for in the first place. We did reach out to the principal; in fact, I visited her while in town. She refused to comment on the situation. School district officials say they are investigating but pointed to Section 33(d) of the Education Act to suggest wrongdoing by the coach. I then asked whether or not they had now infringed upon this section of the act by letting him go, only to receive no response. We emailed the province, but they remained silent as well, citing the district's investigation. REPORT by Syd Fizzard 🍁:

Rebel News

47,862 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Joe Rogan reacts to the "Heil Hitler" song 👇 This is such an out of touch take by Joe, and it's seriously disappointing, though it shouldn’t come as a surprise considering how he responded to the Dave Smith and Douglas Murray drama. To be clear, I couldn't care less about the existence of Kanye’s song. Can I look at it from a humorous angle? Sure. Could I say that the melody is catchy? Yeah, I guess. Should it have a right to exist? Absolutely. However, the issue here is Joe trying to claim that the fact major platforms like iTunes or Spotify removed or refused to host Kanye’s song somehow proves that Jews “control everything.” That’s painfully low-IQ beyond belief. Hitler, the Nazis, the Holocaust - these impacted millions of people. It wasn’t just the Jews who were despised by the Nazis, and it wasn’t only the Jews who suffered in the Holocaust. This is by no means an attempt to downplay the suffering and hatred Jews experienced. My point is that millions of people from various backgrounds have been affected by WWII in some way. My grandmother was a non-Jewish Holocaust survivor, and if she were still alive, she would be horrified to hear a song with a chorus praising Hitler. There are many non-Jewish execs with personal ties to the tragedies of WWII who would be disgusted by such a song and who would absolutely influence the decision not to host it on their platforms. The glorification of Nazism and Holocaust denial is also illegal in many countries. Logistically, it would be a nightmare. And let’s not pretend there aren’t plenty of things that are by default considered morally unacceptable, things that are immediately condemned and silenced. Does Joe think that if Eminem released a song about how much he hates Black people, constantly using the N-word to describe them, it would be widely accepted? It wouldn’t. He’d be cancelled instantly. You certainly wouldn’t see people jamming to it on TikTok or discussing whether it should be allowed under the banner of free speech.

Joe Rogan reacts to the "Heil Hitler" song 👇 This is such an out of touch take by Joe, and it's seriously disappointing, though it shouldn’t come as a surprise considering how he responded to the Dave Smith and Douglas Murray drama. To be clear, I couldn't care less about the existence of Kanye’s song. Can I look at it from a humorous angle? Sure. Could I say that the melody is catchy? Yeah, I guess. Should it have a right to exist? Absolutely. However, the issue here is Joe trying to claim that the fact major platforms like iTunes or Spotify removed or refused to host Kanye’s song somehow proves that Jews “control everything.” That’s painfully low-IQ beyond belief. Hitler, the Nazis, the Holocaust - these impacted millions of people. It wasn’t just the Jews who were despised by the Nazis, and it wasn’t only the Jews who suffered in the Holocaust. This is by no means an attempt to downplay the suffering and hatred Jews experienced. My point is that millions of people from various backgrounds have been affected by WWII in some way. My grandmother was a non-Jewish Holocaust survivor, and if she were still alive, she would be horrified to hear a song with a chorus praising Hitler. There are many non-Jewish execs with personal ties to the tragedies of WWII who would be disgusted by such a song and who would absolutely influence the decision not to host it on their platforms. The glorification of Nazism and Holocaust denial is also illegal in many countries. Logistically, it would be a nightmare. And let’s not pretend there aren’t plenty of things that are by default considered morally unacceptable, things that are immediately condemned and silenced. Does Joe think that if Eminem released a song about how much he hates Black people, constantly using the N-word to describe them, it would be widely accepted? It wouldn’t. He’d be cancelled instantly. You certainly wouldn’t see people jamming to it on TikTok or discussing whether it should be allowed under the banner of free speech.

Aɴᴛ

345,055 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I am hoping and praying that this latest deal proposal by President Trump—which has been accepted by Israel—is now accepted by Hamas. All good people across the world should be united in support for this deal; in wanting the Israeli hostages to be released and for the brutal war in Gaza to come to an end. Instead, *at best* we have seen silence from the ‘Ceasefire Now’ crowd; whom one might expect would now be calling on Hamas to accept the very thing that they have been zealously advocating for for almost two years. At worst, we have observed prominent pro-Palestine pundits exclaiming with outrage that Hamas should not accept the deal: ‘The Palestinians must reject this surrender deal’ wrote the Editor of British Muslim news site 5Pillars; ‘there is no peace between the neck and the sword…’ wrote a Trinity College Dublin professor (the university in which I am pursuing a PhD). And so the malice of anti-Israel movement is laid bare for even the most unwilling to see clearly. We have been acutely aware since October 7th of this movement’s callous disregard for Israeli lives; the bloodlust that erupted in the wake of the massacre and the demonic ripping down of hostage posters of innocent Israel children illustrated that for us clearly. What has been perhaps less clear, although today most apparent, is their callous disregard for Palestinian lives also; a people whom they evidently regard as nothing more than pawns to be used in their obsessive hatred against the world’s only Jewish State. Since the immediate aftermath of October 7th, the label of being ‘pro-genocide’ has been hurled at any of us who showed public empathy for the victims of this massacre and expressed horror at the cruel reactions in the face of it. Even those of us who vocally supported a ceasefire and hostage deal from the very beginning were nonetheless smeared with this label if we refused to turn our backs on our loved ones in Israel and refused to accept the dehumanisation of Israelis/antisemitism in the diaspora as a justified byproduct of pro-Palestine advocacy. The projection behind those who celebrated October 7th yet accuse anyone tenuously linked to the world’s only Jewish State of being ‘pro-genocide’ should always have been clear. If it was not, it has been made crystal clear today.

I am hoping and praying that this latest deal proposal by President Trump—which has been accepted by Israel—is now accepted by Hamas. All good people across the world should be united in support for this deal; in wanting the Israeli hostages to be released and for the brutal war in Gaza to come to an end. Instead, at best we have seen silence from the ‘Ceasefire Now’ crowd; whom one might expect would now be calling on Hamas to accept the very thing that they have been zealously advocating for for almost two years. At worst, we have observed prominent pro-Palestine pundits exclaiming with outrage that Hamas should not accept the deal: ‘The Palestinians must reject this surrender deal’ wrote the Editor of British Muslim news site 5Pillars; ‘there is no peace between the neck and the sword…’ wrote a Trinity College Dublin professor (the university in which I am pursuing a PhD). And so the malice of anti-Israel movement is laid bare for even the most unwilling to see clearly. We have been acutely aware since October 7th of this movement’s callous disregard for Israeli lives; the bloodlust that erupted in the wake of the massacre and the demonic ripping down of hostage posters of innocent Israel children illustrated that for us clearly. What has been perhaps less clear, although today most apparent, is their callous disregard for Palestinian lives also; a people whom they evidently regard as nothing more than pawns to be used in their obsessive hatred against the world’s only Jewish State. Since the immediate aftermath of October 7th, the label of being ‘pro-genocide’ has been hurled at any of us who showed public empathy for the victims of this massacre and expressed horror at the cruel reactions in the face of it. Even those of us who vocally supported a ceasefire and hostage deal from the very beginning were nonetheless smeared with this label if we refused to turn our backs on our loved ones in Israel and refused to accept the dehumanisation of Israelis/antisemitism in the diaspora as a justified byproduct of pro-Palestine advocacy. The projection behind those who celebrated October 7th yet accuse anyone tenuously linked to the world’s only Jewish State of being ‘pro-genocide’ should always have been clear. If it was not, it has been made crystal clear today.

Rachel Moiselle

19,404 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Shawn Mendes’ concert statement represents a very important discourse-shift taking place regarding the genocide. We are now at the stage where it is FINALLY and much too late being widely accepted (except by the delusional and unhinged) that Israel is indeed committing a genocide against Palestinians. However, although accepting this horrifying truth about Palestinian suffering, the focus of liberal and elite western discourse remains on Zionist (masked as Jewish) feelings. Instead of using this momentum to stop and undo harm and hold perpetrators accountable, we are being forced to once again protect Zionist Jews from the world’s scorn because they are somehow not all responsible for the actions of their government, despite Jewish supremacy and settler colonialism being the foundation of Zionism as an ideology. Ironic, also, because Zionists have spent the last 2 years making it very clear they stand on guard for Israel no matter where they live. Poll after poll has shown an overwhelming majority of Israelis both in Israel and in the west denying death, destruction and starvation in Gaza, and manufacturing consent for genocide. Anti-Zionist scorn will and should be the only worldwide response to the crimes of Zionism. Every single genocide-endorsing and enabling Zionist (including the non-Israeli ones) have blood on their hands - the blood of almost a million missing and murdered Palestinian children, women, and men. Making Zionists and Israelis uncomfortable is the least you should be doing. Doesn’t matter if they happen to be Jewish. If a Christian or Muslim serial killer accused us of anti-Christian or anti-Muslim bias, would we excuse their crimes? Then why is that exactly what we have been doing with Zionist Jews who threaten us with the charge of antisemitism anytime they are held accountable for genocide? Why is Jewishness the ONLY faith identify that has been allowed to be weaponized and used both as a shield and as a gun?

Shawn Mendes’ concert statement represents a very important discourse-shift taking place regarding the genocide. We are now at the stage where it is FINALLY and much too late being widely accepted (except by the delusional and unhinged) that Israel is indeed committing a genocide against Palestinians. However, although accepting this horrifying truth about Palestinian suffering, the focus of liberal and elite western discourse remains on Zionist (masked as Jewish) feelings. Instead of using this momentum to stop and undo harm and hold perpetrators accountable, we are being forced to once again protect Zionist Jews from the world’s scorn because they are somehow not all responsible for the actions of their government, despite Jewish supremacy and settler colonialism being the foundation of Zionism as an ideology. Ironic, also, because Zionists have spent the last 2 years making it very clear they stand on guard for Israel no matter where they live. Poll after poll has shown an overwhelming majority of Israelis both in Israel and in the west denying death, destruction and starvation in Gaza, and manufacturing consent for genocide. Anti-Zionist scorn will and should be the only worldwide response to the crimes of Zionism. Every single genocide-endorsing and enabling Zionist (including the non-Israeli ones) have blood on their hands - the blood of almost a million missing and murdered Palestinian children, women, and men. Making Zionists and Israelis uncomfortable is the least you should be doing. Doesn’t matter if they happen to be Jewish. If a Christian or Muslim serial killer accused us of anti-Christian or anti-Muslim bias, would we excuse their crimes? Then why is that exactly what we have been doing with Zionist Jews who threaten us with the charge of antisemitism anytime they are held accountable for genocide? Why is Jewishness the ONLY faith identify that has been allowed to be weaponized and used both as a shield and as a gun?

Dr. Sabreena Ghaffar-Siddiqui

18,427 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨Talk Is Cheap While Jews Bleed: NYC’s Jewish Community Under Attack and Fed Up For the past 18 months, New York City’s Jewish community has been living in fear as antisemitic and pro-terrorist demonstrations have erupted in front of synagogues, schools, and Jewish-owned businesses and homes . Since the October 7th terrorist attacks, antisemitic hate crimes have skyrocketed—Jewish New Yorkers are being harassed, threatened, and physically attacked on a near-daily basis, simply for being Jewish. Despite this, when members of the Jewish community defend themselves, City Hall’s response isn’t to support them—it’s to investigate them. Just last week in Crown Heights, Jewish residents pushed back against what they described as “paid and trained antisemitic anarchists” who brought disruption and provocation to a peaceful neighborhood. The protest occurred just steps away from 770 Eastern Parkway—commonly known as “770”—one of the holiest and most iconic Jewish sites in the United States. It’s not only a synagogue but a spiritual headquarters for the global Chabad-Lubavitch movement. To the Jewish community, this location is sacred ground—and yet it was allowed to become a target for hate. Rather than condemning the agitators, the Mayor’s office reportedly called for an NYPD investigation into the community’s response. I spoke with a Jewish resident who lives in a heavily Orthodox area. She told me her young child was in tears while protesters outside their neighborhood screamed death chants targeting Jews. “How is this reality?” she asked. “Are we in Nazi Germany again?” Community members are outraged. “Talk is cheap,” one longtime resident said. “Politicians show up, say a few words on camera, and disappear. There’s no real action. No protection.” There is also a legal component being ignored. It is federally illegal to protest or disrupt a house of worship—no matter what race, creed, or religion you are. Yet antisemitic demonstrators have targeted synagogues repeatedly with little to no accountability. The Jewish community says these actions would never be tolerated if they were aimed at any other faith group. Jewish students across city schools are also being harassed and threatened, with some too afraid to speak up. Even more disturbing, some city officials have dismissed these concerns, saying it’s simply “how students feel”—leaving Jewish children exposed and helpless. Hate crime stats continue to climb, and the Jewish community says the city’s response is not only inadequate but insulting. “The words from City Hall don’t match the reality on the streets,” said one Crown Heights resident. “We’re done waiting for help that isn’t coming.” The message from the Jewish community is clear: protect us, or we will protect ourselves. By Leeroy Johnson For licensing email viralnewsnyc@gmail.com

🚨Talk Is Cheap While Jews Bleed: NYC’s Jewish Community Under Attack and Fed Up For the past 18 months, New York City’s Jewish community has been living in fear as antisemitic and pro-terrorist demonstrations have erupted in front of synagogues, schools, and Jewish-owned businesses and homes . Since the October 7th terrorist attacks, antisemitic hate crimes have skyrocketed—Jewish New Yorkers are being harassed, threatened, and physically attacked on a near-daily basis, simply for being Jewish. Despite this, when members of the Jewish community defend themselves, City Hall’s response isn’t to support them—it’s to investigate them. Just last week in Crown Heights, Jewish residents pushed back against what they described as “paid and trained antisemitic anarchists” who brought disruption and provocation to a peaceful neighborhood. The protest occurred just steps away from 770 Eastern Parkway—commonly known as “770”—one of the holiest and most iconic Jewish sites in the United States. It’s not only a synagogue but a spiritual headquarters for the global Chabad-Lubavitch movement. To the Jewish community, this location is sacred ground—and yet it was allowed to become a target for hate. Rather than condemning the agitators, the Mayor’s office reportedly called for an NYPD investigation into the community’s response. I spoke with a Jewish resident who lives in a heavily Orthodox area. She told me her young child was in tears while protesters outside their neighborhood screamed death chants targeting Jews. “How is this reality?” she asked. “Are we in Nazi Germany again?” Community members are outraged. “Talk is cheap,” one longtime resident said. “Politicians show up, say a few words on camera, and disappear. There’s no real action. No protection.” There is also a legal component being ignored. It is federally illegal to protest or disrupt a house of worship—no matter what race, creed, or religion you are. Yet antisemitic demonstrators have targeted synagogues repeatedly with little to no accountability. The Jewish community says these actions would never be tolerated if they were aimed at any other faith group. Jewish students across city schools are also being harassed and threatened, with some too afraid to speak up. Even more disturbing, some city officials have dismissed these concerns, saying it’s simply “how students feel”—leaving Jewish children exposed and helpless. Hate crime stats continue to climb, and the Jewish community says the city’s response is not only inadequate but insulting. “The words from City Hall don’t match the reality on the streets,” said one Crown Heights resident. “We’re done waiting for help that isn’t coming.” The message from the Jewish community is clear: protect us, or we will protect ourselves. By Leeroy Johnson For licensing email [email protected]

Viral News NYC

42,469 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Wesley Hunt OBLITERATES leftists who keep saying black people need to be treated differently, as if they can't earn anything He NAILED IT. "I am a living breathing product of that dream. And so is Clarence Thomas!" "I don't want ANYTHING given to me because of the way I look because of the color of my skin." "I'm a follower of Christ. I am a veteran. I'm a West Point grad. I am an Apache pilot. I'm a United States congressman for a white majority district and yes, I am black and I am proud." "But first and foremost, I am an AMERICAN and our laws should reflect that and right now, the left is trying to hammer us because they're saying that there is not going to be any black people that's going to represent the Republican Party in Congress next year!" "But what they also fail to realize is that 3 of the 4 ran or are running for higher office and one is retiring." "And what I don't want to do is put the burden in our laws to ensure that we have an outcome of X amount black people or this and that because of the way someone looks!" "I want the people of every single district that gets drawn in America to choose the best person." "Last time I ran, I had about 10 people that were in my Republican primary and none of them were white and I was the only black guy. And of course, I won without a runoff last time I ran for Congress. And why is that? Because people are choosing the best candidate." "As someone like me who is a direct descendant of a slave who is living the American dream — because the people are NOT judging me based on the color of my skin. By the content of my character is exactly what our laws should reflect!" Wesley Hunt Kayleigh McEnany Saturday in America

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Wesley Hunt OBLITERATES leftists who keep saying black people need to be treated differently, as if they can't earn anything He NAILED IT. "I am a living breathing product of that dream. And so is Clarence Thomas!" "I don't want ANYTHING given to me because of the way I look because of the color of my skin." "I'm a follower of Christ. I am a veteran. I'm a West Point grad. I am an Apache pilot. I'm a United States congressman for a white majority district and yes, I am black and I am proud." "But first and foremost, I am an AMERICAN and our laws should reflect that and right now, the left is trying to hammer us because they're saying that there is not going to be any black people that's going to represent the Republican Party in Congress next year!" "But what they also fail to realize is that 3 of the 4 ran or are running for higher office and one is retiring." "And what I don't want to do is put the burden in our laws to ensure that we have an outcome of X amount black people or this and that because of the way someone looks!" "I want the people of every single district that gets drawn in America to choose the best person." "Last time I ran, I had about 10 people that were in my Republican primary and none of them were white and I was the only black guy. And of course, I won without a runoff last time I ran for Congress. And why is that? Because people are choosing the best candidate." "As someone like me who is a direct descendant of a slave who is living the American dream — because the people are NOT judging me based on the color of my skin. By the content of my character is exactly what our laws should reflect!" Wesley Hunt Kayleigh McEnany Saturday in America

Eric Daugherty

83,834 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

For some reason, people seem to think that if someone is strong, athletic, resilient and never complains, it means they can be treated a little differently. You can suddenly hang on them, jump on their back, lean your full weight on them, have them carry you around the stage, sit on their shoulders, or shove them for the sake of a laugh or a memorable moment. After all, they'll handle it. They're strong. But strength does not make a person invulnerable. Behind a beautiful smile, professionalism and the habit of enduring everything, there may be pain that those around them simply don't notice. And even if they do, they may not consider it serious enough to change their behavior. What makes it even more concerning is when that person has already spoken openly about their health issues. Problems with the spine, neck or herniated discs are not something that should be brushed aside. A single awkward movement, an unexpected load or a sudden loss of balance can trigger a flare-up, a pinched nerve or even a new injury. And the consequences don't always appear immediately. Sometimes the pain doesn't set in until hours or even days later. Personally, I've never found these kinds of "jokes" funny, cute or something that represents a healthy family or friendship dynamic. When someone doesn't expect another grown adult's full weight to be thrown onto them, they have no time to brace their muscles, distribute the load properly, or keep their balance. In a split second, the strain falls on the spine, neck, knees and ankles. If that person is already bent over or in motion, the risk becomes even greater. The saddest part is that people who never complain are often the ones others worry about the least. They're seen as the reliable one - the person who can handle anything. But that's a dangerous misconception. No one should be expected to endure pain simply because they look strong. No one should become the target of these kinds of pranks just because they're capable of staying on their feet. Real care from the people around you isn't shown after you've already been injured. It's shown much earlier - by consciously avoiding situations that could cause harm in the first place. Especially when you know someone has existing health issues. And it's hard to believe that the people closest to him wouldn't know, when even millions of complete strangers do.. What stands out the most is that these "games" always seem to happen to the same person and involve nearly half of the people who are supposed to be his family. Why is he always the one people suddenly jump on, hang off, use as support or turn into part of a joke? I truly hope people stop treating physical strength as permission to keep testing its limits over and over again. Because health is not something worth risking for a few seconds of laughter or attention. Some things can be fixed. Others leave injuries that can stay with a person for the rest of their life. I sincerely hope that people will begin to see not only the strength of a strong person, but the human being behind that strength, someone who also deserves to be protected. Especially by those who are supposed to be family. And believe me, I'm not trying to be overprotective or act like an overbearing "mom". I'm not blowing this out of proportion and I'm not treating him like he's fragile. I know #Jungkook is a grown man. I know he's been with the members for many years. But none of that cancels out my concern or common sense. I expect mature, reasonable adults to understand why so many people are upset by these repeated "games". WE LOVE YOU JUNGKOOK ♥️

For some reason, people seem to think that if someone is strong, athletic, resilient and never complains, it means they can be treated a little differently. You can suddenly hang on them, jump on their back, lean your full weight on them, have them carry you around the stage, sit on their shoulders, or shove them for the sake of a laugh or a memorable moment. After all, they'll handle it. They're strong. But strength does not make a person invulnerable. Behind a beautiful smile, professionalism and the habit of enduring everything, there may be pain that those around them simply don't notice. And even if they do, they may not consider it serious enough to change their behavior. What makes it even more concerning is when that person has already spoken openly about their health issues. Problems with the spine, neck or herniated discs are not something that should be brushed aside. A single awkward movement, an unexpected load or a sudden loss of balance can trigger a flare-up, a pinched nerve or even a new injury. And the consequences don't always appear immediately. Sometimes the pain doesn't set in until hours or even days later. Personally, I've never found these kinds of "jokes" funny, cute or something that represents a healthy family or friendship dynamic. When someone doesn't expect another grown adult's full weight to be thrown onto them, they have no time to brace their muscles, distribute the load properly, or keep their balance. In a split second, the strain falls on the spine, neck, knees and ankles. If that person is already bent over or in motion, the risk becomes even greater. The saddest part is that people who never complain are often the ones others worry about the least. They're seen as the reliable one - the person who can handle anything. But that's a dangerous misconception. No one should be expected to endure pain simply because they look strong. No one should become the target of these kinds of pranks just because they're capable of staying on their feet. Real care from the people around you isn't shown after you've already been injured. It's shown much earlier - by consciously avoiding situations that could cause harm in the first place. Especially when you know someone has existing health issues. And it's hard to believe that the people closest to him wouldn't know, when even millions of complete strangers do.. What stands out the most is that these "games" always seem to happen to the same person and involve nearly half of the people who are supposed to be his family. Why is he always the one people suddenly jump on, hang off, use as support or turn into part of a joke? I truly hope people stop treating physical strength as permission to keep testing its limits over and over again. Because health is not something worth risking for a few seconds of laughter or attention. Some things can be fixed. Others leave injuries that can stay with a person for the rest of their life. I sincerely hope that people will begin to see not only the strength of a strong person, but the human being behind that strength, someone who also deserves to be protected. Especially by those who are supposed to be family. And believe me, I'm not trying to be overprotective or act like an overbearing "mom". I'm not blowing this out of proportion and I'm not treating him like he's fragile. I know #Jungkook is a grown man. I know he's been with the members for many years. But none of that cancels out my concern or common sense. I expect mature, reasonable adults to understand why so many people are upset by these repeated "games". WE LOVE YOU JUNGKOOK ♥️

𝕁𝕌ℕ𝔾𝕂𝕆𝕆𝕂 | ℂ𝕀𝕊 𝔽𝔸ℕ𝔹𝔸𝕊𝔼

177,058 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

As promised, here is the audio footage from an unprovoked verbal assault from @JoeDalyPB4PMayo and also visual footage of a subsequent assault of my partner Stephen Kerr (Joe bumped him from behind twice with his car and then drove off with Stephen on the bonnet). I had gotten 12 feet PAST Daly on the street when his young colleague stepped in my path (not knowing who I was) to speak to me. Daly then launched into a verbal attack, which resulted in my child crying (rest of video including audio from a stranger who witnessed what happened with the car is here ) He calls me a fascist probably over a dozen times. This is funny because fascists aggressively attack and suppress anyone with opposing views. So, who is the fascist? I think attacking someone without provocation while they are with their child minding their business might be classed as aggressive tactics toward someone with a different opinion to yours, and the irony is I agree with their stance on neutrality which is what they were engaging the public on when this incident unfolded. I was recording because I was warned he was about town and a buddy of Joe's (who he teamed up with to cancel Mise Éire, including making nuisance threatening calls to the hotel who hosted it) is taking Stephen and I to court for a vexatious civil restraining order. This person has also physically assaulted Stephen and has verbally assaulted us multiple times. As a consequence, we now record everything because these people are liars, and the stalking and harrassment is the other way around (clearly). I have witnessed Stephen be assaulted five times now by various people. Mostly PB4P members. The attacks are always unprovoked. Evidence of their lies can be seen on Daly's page. He wrote of this latest incident that I was the instigator and harrasser. But as people will hear, I did not speak to him first, and I was polite to his colleague. The longer version of this video has been posted already on YouTube and FB, and the vast majority of comments are from people who are disgusted at Daly (a teacher!) and supportive of us. One or two comments were from highly abusive PB4P supporters, and one or two said I should have just said nothing and moved on. But I teach my child you stand up to big bullies. Also when I say "f***ing" in this video I was highly upset at that point because my child had started to cry and to be honest I wanted to do more than curse at that point in relation to this big man, but I refrained. He sounds lower than me because he is a few feet away and the phone was close to my mouth. PB4P have become very emboldened lately. Remember recently, Ryan Casey being targeted by them in the most vile manner, despite that his girlfriend Ashling Murphy was almost decapitated? All because he has a valid and reasonable opinion on immigration? They are emboldened because the state is on their side. But I can tell Mr.Daly now that I will not be letting this matter (below) go. You did not have the decency to leave me alone while with my little girl. You hit my partner with your car. Teachers have a code of conduct they must follow and must be able to demonstrate an even and calm temperament. I will be making a complaint and the Gardaí have been notified of these incidents. You lied to the Gardaí and online about what happened. You didn't think that your verbal assault was recorded in full. I will ensure you stay away from me, my family and my partner. I give you my word. You have gone too far and better remove defamatory statement about me from your page ASAP.

As promised, here is the audio footage from an unprovoked verbal assault from @JoeDalyPB4PMayo and also visual footage of a subsequent assault of my partner Stephen Kerr (Joe bumped him from behind twice with his car and then drove off with Stephen on the bonnet). I had gotten 12 feet PAST Daly on the street when his young colleague stepped in my path (not knowing who I was) to speak to me. Daly then launched into a verbal attack, which resulted in my child crying (rest of video including audio from a stranger who witnessed what happened with the car is here ) He calls me a fascist probably over a dozen times. This is funny because fascists aggressively attack and suppress anyone with opposing views. So, who is the fascist? I think attacking someone without provocation while they are with their child minding their business might be classed as aggressive tactics toward someone with a different opinion to yours, and the irony is I agree with their stance on neutrality which is what they were engaging the public on when this incident unfolded. I was recording because I was warned he was about town and a buddy of Joe's (who he teamed up with to cancel Mise Éire, including making nuisance threatening calls to the hotel who hosted it) is taking Stephen and I to court for a vexatious civil restraining order. This person has also physically assaulted Stephen and has verbally assaulted us multiple times. As a consequence, we now record everything because these people are liars, and the stalking and harrassment is the other way around (clearly). I have witnessed Stephen be assaulted five times now by various people. Mostly PB4P members. The attacks are always unprovoked. Evidence of their lies can be seen on Daly's page. He wrote of this latest incident that I was the instigator and harrasser. But as people will hear, I did not speak to him first, and I was polite to his colleague. The longer version of this video has been posted already on YouTube and FB, and the vast majority of comments are from people who are disgusted at Daly (a teacher!) and supportive of us. One or two comments were from highly abusive PB4P supporters, and one or two said I should have just said nothing and moved on. But I teach my child you stand up to big bullies. Also when I say "f***ing" in this video I was highly upset at that point because my child had started to cry and to be honest I wanted to do more than curse at that point in relation to this big man, but I refrained. He sounds lower than me because he is a few feet away and the phone was close to my mouth. PB4P have become very emboldened lately. Remember recently, Ryan Casey being targeted by them in the most vile manner, despite that his girlfriend Ashling Murphy was almost decapitated? All because he has a valid and reasonable opinion on immigration? They are emboldened because the state is on their side. But I can tell Mr.Daly now that I will not be letting this matter (below) go. You did not have the decency to leave me alone while with my little girl. You hit my partner with your car. Teachers have a code of conduct they must follow and must be able to demonstrate an even and calm temperament. I will be making a complaint and the Gardaí have been notified of these incidents. You lied to the Gardaí and online about what happened. You didn't think that your verbal assault was recorded in full. I will ensure you stay away from me, my family and my partner. I give you my word. You have gone too far and better remove defamatory statement about me from your page ASAP.

Susanne Delaney

21,575 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Israel And Its Supporters Are Causing Attacks On Jewish Institutions Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt gave a bizarre appearance on CNN in response to an attempted car bombing of a Michigan synagogue by a man whose Lebanese family members were killed by Israeli forces. “We are seeing Jewish people, the Jewish state, blamed for the war in the Middle East,” Greenblatt said. “That is wrong. It is wrong to scapegoat, it is wrong to hold Jewish people accountable for something you don’t like on the other side of the planet. And we really need leaders on all sides in politics, running for office, podcasters, to stop with the conspiracies, to stop with the accusations, and then tell us ‘but we oppose antisemitism’. You don’t get to say you’re opposed to hate if you’re trafficking in hateful conspiracy theories.” Now, at first glance it this might read like Greenblatt is taking the entirely reasonable position that it is wrong to blame Jewish Americans for the actions of the Israeli government. But take a closer look at his use of the phrase “the Jewish state”. What Greenblatt is actually doing here is claiming it’s an antisemitic conspiracy theory to blame the state of Israel for its war crimes, while simultaneously lumping all Jewish people in with the actions of that state. That’s what he’s doing when he says “Jewish people, the Jewish state” in the same breath while talking about Israeli acts of mass military violence. It’s so obnoxious how genocide apologists like Greenblatt make a living actively telling everyone that Jews and Judaism are inseparable from the acts of the Israeli government, but whenever there’s an extremist attack by someone who doesn’t distinguish between western Jews and the state of Israel it gets blamed on the pro-Palestine left. Pro-Palestine leftists perform endless verbal gymnastics to avoid conflating Jewish people with the state of Israel, while Israel and its supporters conflate them constantly. Yet we’re always the ones who get blamed whenever there’s a terror attack on a Jewish institution by someone enraged by Israel’s actions. Zionists are the ones doing everything they can to make sure people see the state of Israel as synonymous with Jews and Judaism. That is what they are doing every time they claim a criticism of Israel’s actions is hate speech against Jews. They are claiming that the nation and its government are one and the same as the entirety of the Jewish faith and its adherents. Pro-Palestine leftists have been doing the exact opposite. We go to great pains to make sure all our arguments are carefully worded to avoid being interpreted as an attack on the Jewish faith, making it clear that our grievance is with the state of Israel and the political ideology of Zionism which supports that state’s abusive nature. And then Israel apologists come in and smear those meticulously crafted arguments as a hateful attack on all Jews everywhere. Zionists are therefore responsible for the growing perception that our Jewish neighbors and countrymen are culpable for the abuses of the Israeli government. When more attacks on Jewish institutions occur (and they will), it is Israel and its supporters who will hold the blame for this, not the pro-Palestine left. I am not saying attacks on Jewish institutions should happen. I am not saying it will be good when they do happen. I’m saying it will happen, and when it happens it will be a terrible thing. And it will be the fault of Israel and its supporters. We’ve been running around like crazy trying to stop this, falling all over ourselves to thwart the Zionist efforts to conflate Jews with Israel, but our voices aren’t strong enough. We’re not the ones getting loudly amplified by every mass media outlet, they are. It’s not people like me getting invited to appear on CNN to talk to Wolf Blitzer, it’s people like Jonathan Greenblatt. So when we lose the narrative war on this front and the next extremist attack occurs, it won’t be our fault. It will be theirs. It will be the fault of Israel and its apologists. We fought them as hard as we could to prevent this, but they won. And the consequences of this will therefore rest squarely on their shoulders.

Israel And Its Supporters Are Causing Attacks On Jewish Institutions Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt gave a bizarre appearance on CNN in response to an attempted car bombing of a Michigan synagogue by a man whose Lebanese family members were killed by Israeli forces. “We are seeing Jewish people, the Jewish state, blamed for the war in the Middle East,” Greenblatt said. “That is wrong. It is wrong to scapegoat, it is wrong to hold Jewish people accountable for something you don’t like on the other side of the planet. And we really need leaders on all sides in politics, running for office, podcasters, to stop with the conspiracies, to stop with the accusations, and then tell us ‘but we oppose antisemitism’. You don’t get to say you’re opposed to hate if you’re trafficking in hateful conspiracy theories.” Now, at first glance it this might read like Greenblatt is taking the entirely reasonable position that it is wrong to blame Jewish Americans for the actions of the Israeli government. But take a closer look at his use of the phrase “the Jewish state”. What Greenblatt is actually doing here is claiming it’s an antisemitic conspiracy theory to blame the state of Israel for its war crimes, while simultaneously lumping all Jewish people in with the actions of that state. That’s what he’s doing when he says “Jewish people, the Jewish state” in the same breath while talking about Israeli acts of mass military violence. It’s so obnoxious how genocide apologists like Greenblatt make a living actively telling everyone that Jews and Judaism are inseparable from the acts of the Israeli government, but whenever there’s an extremist attack by someone who doesn’t distinguish between western Jews and the state of Israel it gets blamed on the pro-Palestine left. Pro-Palestine leftists perform endless verbal gymnastics to avoid conflating Jewish people with the state of Israel, while Israel and its supporters conflate them constantly. Yet we’re always the ones who get blamed whenever there’s a terror attack on a Jewish institution by someone enraged by Israel’s actions. Zionists are the ones doing everything they can to make sure people see the state of Israel as synonymous with Jews and Judaism. That is what they are doing every time they claim a criticism of Israel’s actions is hate speech against Jews. They are claiming that the nation and its government are one and the same as the entirety of the Jewish faith and its adherents. Pro-Palestine leftists have been doing the exact opposite. We go to great pains to make sure all our arguments are carefully worded to avoid being interpreted as an attack on the Jewish faith, making it clear that our grievance is with the state of Israel and the political ideology of Zionism which supports that state’s abusive nature. And then Israel apologists come in and smear those meticulously crafted arguments as a hateful attack on all Jews everywhere. Zionists are therefore responsible for the growing perception that our Jewish neighbors and countrymen are culpable for the abuses of the Israeli government. When more attacks on Jewish institutions occur (and they will), it is Israel and its supporters who will hold the blame for this, not the pro-Palestine left. I am not saying attacks on Jewish institutions should happen. I am not saying it will be good when they do happen. I’m saying it will happen, and when it happens it will be a terrible thing. And it will be the fault of Israel and its supporters. We’ve been running around like crazy trying to stop this, falling all over ourselves to thwart the Zionist efforts to conflate Jews with Israel, but our voices aren’t strong enough. We’re not the ones getting loudly amplified by every mass media outlet, they are. It’s not people like me getting invited to appear on CNN to talk to Wolf Blitzer, it’s people like Jonathan Greenblatt. So when we lose the narrative war on this front and the next extremist attack occurs, it won’t be our fault. It will be theirs. It will be the fault of Israel and its apologists. We fought them as hard as we could to prevent this, but they won. And the consequences of this will therefore rest squarely on their shoulders.

Caitlin Johnstone

33,171 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 ERIKA KIRK DELIVERS POLITICS AND RELIGION TO MINORS INSIDE A PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL — AND PARENTS ARE FURIOUS Erika Kirk opened with a light story about debating her toddler over a disappearing belly button. She talked about Chicago, the Bulls, Michael Jordan. Then the pivot. She described launching Turning Point USA at 18 instead of taking the “normal” path. She referenced speaking with POTUS weeks ago. She asked students who planned to vote in the midterms. She warned them that “the enemy would love nothing more than to confuse you.” Then she told students every decision “will make a mark on your soul,” asking whether their choices bring them “closer to heaven” and “closer to being the person God has called you to be.” She also cautioned students that “it’s so easy to hide behind a keyboard… to press send and think there are no ramifications,” reminding them there is always “someone on the other end.” Erika urged boys to think about the kind of fathers they’ll become. Told girls to be modest. Told students to live as if their choices could end up on “the front page of a newspaper.” At one point she paused and apologized, saying "sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days." All of it delivered inside a taxpayer-funded public school gym to students, many below voting age. Supporters say it was character building. Others say it was midterm season messaging aimed at minors. Parents are asking: if this came from the opposite political side… would it still be called “inspirational”? Should public schools be neutral... or is this exactly how influence starts?

🚨 ERIKA KIRK DELIVERS POLITICS AND RELIGION TO MINORS INSIDE A PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL — AND PARENTS ARE FURIOUS Erika Kirk opened with a light story about debating her toddler over a disappearing belly button. She talked about Chicago, the Bulls, Michael Jordan. Then the pivot. She described launching Turning Point USA at 18 instead of taking the “normal” path. She referenced speaking with POTUS weeks ago. She asked students who planned to vote in the midterms. She warned them that “the enemy would love nothing more than to confuse you.” Then she told students every decision “will make a mark on your soul,” asking whether their choices bring them “closer to heaven” and “closer to being the person God has called you to be.” She also cautioned students that “it’s so easy to hide behind a keyboard… to press send and think there are no ramifications,” reminding them there is always “someone on the other end.” Erika urged boys to think about the kind of fathers they’ll become. Told girls to be modest. Told students to live as if their choices could end up on “the front page of a newspaper.” At one point she paused and apologized, saying "sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days." All of it delivered inside a taxpayer-funded public school gym to students, many below voting age. Supporters say it was character building. Others say it was midterm season messaging aimed at minors. Parents are asking: if this came from the opposite political side… would it still be called “inspirational”? Should public schools be neutral... or is this exactly how influence starts?

HustleBitch

155,915 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

THE LASTING DAMAGE OF A “CHEAT” AT THE FIRST BRAZIL DLC! Worlds invites should be earned with skill and INTEGRITY. It’s already abysmal that the World Champion does not get an invite to Continentals. This is the previous World Champion… should they not be able to defend their title? I hate to glaze but when that same champ keeps performing, making top cut in almost every event, always getting close, and then finally, when he is one win away in the last round, he loses to a player who was caught on camera earlier that day “cheating”… it really is tragic. I understand you cannot always prove intent. Mistakes happen, and I do not think prizing should be stripped from someone over one situation. However, a Worlds invite should be held to a different standard. That is where the best of the best are supposed to meet. A Worlds invite should not just be about event placement, it should also represent competitive integrity. Frederico ending up with a booster box prize instead of a Golden Mickey… Him/DKP were directly impacted by that loss, and when the difference is that massive, “here’s a box” feels like a terrible consolation prize. At the very least, they should be properly compensated and invite retroactively passed down. If there is documented cheating, or even a major competitive blunder that directly impacted the result, that Worlds invite should be voided and passed down accordingly. Not because of hate. Not because of bias. Because consistency matters. This is what puts Ravensburger and tournament organizers in such an awkward position. Either they were overly harsh and specifically targeted Clement for the angle shot incident in Australia by banning him from Worlds, or they stay consistent and apply that same standard here. You cannot punish one player for a documented competitive issue and then look the other way when it happens somewhere else just because the situation is inconvenient. I am not going to sit here and argue whether the double ink was intentional or not. As an Amber Steel player, I know a lot of decisions run through your head in those moments. But this looked like a very simple hand. The extra ink directly contributed to the win, and the sequence was fast, clean, and immediate. There was not much hesitation there to strongly sell simple forgetfulness. - he went back and flipped the ink … paused and inked again fast …. Change of pace, body language - counting and situation all suspicious …. Keep Lorcana safe, judges … lore guides … whatever they call those spectators with authority - lock in !!!!…2 stream judges spectating and nothing called out ?!? Maybe let the chat/casters be able to engage a judge call to prevent these mistakes from having lasting effects. But bottom line, damage is done! If integrity matters, then the Worlds invite should be voided. Otherwise punishments stop being about fairness and start looking like cherry-picking and selective enforcement. #cheating #lorcana #TCG

THE LASTING DAMAGE OF A “CHEAT” AT THE FIRST BRAZIL DLC! Worlds invites should be earned with skill and INTEGRITY. It’s already abysmal that the World Champion does not get an invite to Continentals. This is the previous World Champion… should they not be able to defend their title? I hate to glaze but when that same champ keeps performing, making top cut in almost every event, always getting close, and then finally, when he is one win away in the last round, he loses to a player who was caught on camera earlier that day “cheating”… it really is tragic. I understand you cannot always prove intent. Mistakes happen, and I do not think prizing should be stripped from someone over one situation. However, a Worlds invite should be held to a different standard. That is where the best of the best are supposed to meet. A Worlds invite should not just be about event placement, it should also represent competitive integrity. Frederico ending up with a booster box prize instead of a Golden Mickey… Him/DKP were directly impacted by that loss, and when the difference is that massive, “here’s a box” feels like a terrible consolation prize. At the very least, they should be properly compensated and invite retroactively passed down. If there is documented cheating, or even a major competitive blunder that directly impacted the result, that Worlds invite should be voided and passed down accordingly. Not because of hate. Not because of bias. Because consistency matters. This is what puts Ravensburger and tournament organizers in such an awkward position. Either they were overly harsh and specifically targeted Clement for the angle shot incident in Australia by banning him from Worlds, or they stay consistent and apply that same standard here. You cannot punish one player for a documented competitive issue and then look the other way when it happens somewhere else just because the situation is inconvenient. I am not going to sit here and argue whether the double ink was intentional or not. As an Amber Steel player, I know a lot of decisions run through your head in those moments. But this looked like a very simple hand. The extra ink directly contributed to the win, and the sequence was fast, clean, and immediate. There was not much hesitation there to strongly sell simple forgetfulness. - he went back and flipped the ink … paused and inked again fast …. Change of pace, body language - counting and situation all suspicious …. Keep Lorcana safe, judges … lore guides … whatever they call those spectators with authority - lock in !!!!…2 stream judges spectating and nothing called out ?!? Maybe let the chat/casters be able to engage a judge call to prevent these mistakes from having lasting effects. But bottom line, damage is done! If integrity matters, then the Worlds invite should be voided. Otherwise punishments stop being about fairness and start looking like cherry-picking and selective enforcement. #cheating #lorcana #TCG

Elias Abdulahad

26,546 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I talked with a man from India in downtown Red Deer about student visas, immigration fraud, refugee claims, and whether Canada should actually enforce its own rules. I started with softball questions. He told me he came here as a student, studied chemical engineering, and is now working in healthcare because that may be a better pathway to permanent residency. Then I asked him about something many Canadians have heard about: students coming here, not finishing school, working instead, and then claiming refugee status when their student visa is running out. At first, he admitted he had heard of cases like that too. Then, when I asked about agencies allegedly helping students qualify financially, students borrowing money to show proof of funds, paying it back after arriving, working jobs, skipping school, and later claiming asylum, he suddenly became more defensive. Maybe he was being careful. Maybe he was caught off guard. But the conversation felt evasive. This is not some wild conspiracy theory. Canada’s own Auditor General reported that in 2023 and 2024, IRCC identified more than 153,000 students as potentially non-compliant with study permit conditions, but only had funding to investigate about 2,000 cases per year. IRCC launched 4,057 investigations, and about 40% of those cases were not closed because students did not respond to requests for information. The federal government has also acknowledged reports of international students and graduates facing removal because of fraud, including fraudulent admission documents, while some students claimed they did not know the documents were fake. And this problem has already hit the news. There were reports of hundreds of Indian students caught up in a fake Canadian college admission letter scandal, with a joint IRCC-CBSA task force reviewing cases. When I asked the man from India what should happen if fraud is happening, he said the government should have strict rules and enforce them. I agree. If you come to Canada honestly, follow the rules, study, work, integrate, and contribute, I respect that. But if people are cheating the student visa system, abusing refugee claims, lying on applications, or using loopholes to stay here after their status expires, Canadians have every right to ask questions. And Albertans have every right to ask why Ottawa controls the system while our communities deal with the consequences. This is another reason I support Alberta independence. Alberta should have control over immigration, enforcement, labor needs, and who gets invited into our society. Full video: An Immigrant Told Me What Canadians Are Afraid to Say

I talked with a man from India in downtown Red Deer about student visas, immigration fraud, refugee claims, and whether Canada should actually enforce its own rules. I started with softball questions. He told me he came here as a student, studied chemical engineering, and is now working in healthcare because that may be a better pathway to permanent residency. Then I asked him about something many Canadians have heard about: students coming here, not finishing school, working instead, and then claiming refugee status when their student visa is running out. At first, he admitted he had heard of cases like that too. Then, when I asked about agencies allegedly helping students qualify financially, students borrowing money to show proof of funds, paying it back after arriving, working jobs, skipping school, and later claiming asylum, he suddenly became more defensive. Maybe he was being careful. Maybe he was caught off guard. But the conversation felt evasive. This is not some wild conspiracy theory. Canada’s own Auditor General reported that in 2023 and 2024, IRCC identified more than 153,000 students as potentially non-compliant with study permit conditions, but only had funding to investigate about 2,000 cases per year. IRCC launched 4,057 investigations, and about 40% of those cases were not closed because students did not respond to requests for information. The federal government has also acknowledged reports of international students and graduates facing removal because of fraud, including fraudulent admission documents, while some students claimed they did not know the documents were fake. And this problem has already hit the news. There were reports of hundreds of Indian students caught up in a fake Canadian college admission letter scandal, with a joint IRCC-CBSA task force reviewing cases. When I asked the man from India what should happen if fraud is happening, he said the government should have strict rules and enforce them. I agree. If you come to Canada honestly, follow the rules, study, work, integrate, and contribute, I respect that. But if people are cheating the student visa system, abusing refugee claims, lying on applications, or using loopholes to stay here after their status expires, Canadians have every right to ask questions. And Albertans have every right to ask why Ottawa controls the system while our communities deal with the consequences. This is another reason I support Alberta independence. Alberta should have control over immigration, enforcement, labor needs, and who gets invited into our society. Full video: An Immigrant Told Me What Canadians Are Afraid to Say

Jon Alberta Patriot

57,382 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Matt is correct that very few on "the right" would gloat if a great tragedy were to befall him like what just happened with Charlie. No doubt we would almost all, if not all, feel grief and sympathy for Matt. I know I would. Despite considering Matt to be very much going down the wrong path currently. Matt is also correct that many on The Left would gleefully gloat over his death, should such a tragedy come to pass. And as such, it is a natural instinct to lean towards the people who, even if they disagree with you "harshly", would actually care if you were to be harmed. However, where Matt goes off the rails here is to polarize, rather than to try to deradicalize. There are more than two choices (e.g., "no IDpol and lose" vs. "IDpol and 'win', supposedly"). That's a false dichotomy. We can defeat the Woke Left without relying on identity politics. Matt seems to be headed down a dangerous path, in at least a few ways: (1) You seriously risk losing who you are, your soul, by taking up the same type of tactics which many of your political opponents have. Matt's "friend or foe" rhetoric mirrors that of Carl Schmitt's "friend-enemy distinction". Which is evident to the people Matt will likely be associating with in the future should he continue along this path (e.g., Auron MacIntyre & company). And make no mistake, leaning into tribalism, leaning into identity politics, which is downstream of the "friend-enemy distinction", is the same as what the Woke Leftists have done. You need not look no further than what has happened with them, and the their general mental and physical well being, to see where this leads. It won't be an immediate change, but over the course of months and years, you will no longer be the same person. And it won't be for the better. (2) You throw out the baby with the bath water. By becoming tribal in this manner, it leaves no room for your political opponents (whether on "the right" or The Left) to eventually possibly make peace with you and co-exist. We can already see the beginnings of this, by Matt's response to one of James recent QT's of Matt. e.g., "you've chosen your side and there's nothing else for us to ever talk about again" This creates an "all or nothing" situation, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy should enough people engage with this type of thinking. Should this mindset become dominant among "the right" (it's already commonplace among many on the The Left), polarization would keep escalating more and more, and life would become increasingly dangerous for everyone as a result. **And yes, while it is true that many Woke Leftists are probably too far gone at this point to come back, there are some who could be deradicalized under the right circumstances. I don't know the specific politics of the two Leftists in the videos I have attached, and they could be very well too far gone in some respects, however, given their genuine grief over Charlie's murder, there is reason to believe they could be brought back into the fold eventually. They could potentially become part of the solution given enough time and deradicalization, rather than a permanent opponent. If not them in particular, well, then other Woke Leftists who were shocked by Charlie's murder could be reachable. This is not the same as "uniting with The Left" , which implies compromising bit-by-bit with their evil. We ought not to, and cannot, do that. For the Woke Left fanatics who refuse to give it up their radicalism, they will have to be removed from positions of power should they currently occupy them, and a shift needs to occur such that their radicalism isn't accepted anymore. There is no question that has to happen. We cannot continue to have Woke Left radicals destroy our society.

Matt is correct that very few on "the right" would gloat if a great tragedy were to befall him like what just happened with Charlie. No doubt we would almost all, if not all, feel grief and sympathy for Matt. I know I would. Despite considering Matt to be very much going down the wrong path currently. Matt is also correct that many on The Left would gleefully gloat over his death, should such a tragedy come to pass. And as such, it is a natural instinct to lean towards the people who, even if they disagree with you "harshly", would actually care if you were to be harmed. However, where Matt goes off the rails here is to polarize, rather than to try to deradicalize. There are more than two choices (e.g., "no IDpol and lose" vs. "IDpol and 'win', supposedly"). That's a false dichotomy. We can defeat the Woke Left without relying on identity politics. Matt seems to be headed down a dangerous path, in at least a few ways: (1) You seriously risk losing who you are, your soul, by taking up the same type of tactics which many of your political opponents have. Matt's "friend or foe" rhetoric mirrors that of Carl Schmitt's "friend-enemy distinction". Which is evident to the people Matt will likely be associating with in the future should he continue along this path (e.g., Auron MacIntyre & company). And make no mistake, leaning into tribalism, leaning into identity politics, which is downstream of the "friend-enemy distinction", is the same as what the Woke Leftists have done. You need not look no further than what has happened with them, and the their general mental and physical well being, to see where this leads. It won't be an immediate change, but over the course of months and years, you will no longer be the same person. And it won't be for the better. (2) You throw out the baby with the bath water. By becoming tribal in this manner, it leaves no room for your political opponents (whether on "the right" or The Left) to eventually possibly make peace with you and co-exist. We can already see the beginnings of this, by Matt's response to one of James recent QT's of Matt. e.g., "you've chosen your side and there's nothing else for us to ever talk about again" This creates an "all or nothing" situation, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy should enough people engage with this type of thinking. Should this mindset become dominant among "the right" (it's already commonplace among many on the The Left), polarization would keep escalating more and more, and life would become increasingly dangerous for everyone as a result. **And yes, while it is true that many Woke Leftists are probably too far gone at this point to come back, there are some who could be deradicalized under the right circumstances. I don't know the specific politics of the two Leftists in the videos I have attached, and they could be very well too far gone in some respects, however, given their genuine grief over Charlie's murder, there is reason to believe they could be brought back into the fold eventually. They could potentially become part of the solution given enough time and deradicalization, rather than a permanent opponent. If not them in particular, well, then other Woke Leftists who were shocked by Charlie's murder could be reachable. This is not the same as "uniting with The Left" , which implies compromising bit-by-bit with their evil. We ought not to, and cannot, do that. For the Woke Left fanatics who refuse to give it up their radicalism, they will have to be removed from positions of power should they currently occupy them, and a shift needs to occur such that their radicalism isn't accepted anymore. There is no question that has to happen. We cannot continue to have Woke Left radicals destroy our society.

Canadian Beaver

13,207 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce