正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Killer question by ⁦Lynsey Bews⁩ because the FM can’t ride two horses at same time arguing that he stands by the Eq Act and provision for single sex spaces while his government is in court arguing against ‘sex’ in Eq Act meaning biological sex.

mandy rhodes

24,289 subscribers

1,041,111 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

lisa keeble 😊 的头像

lisa keeble 😊1 年前

@lynseybews Why are they all so terrified of stating that a woman is, and can only be, a biological female? What are they afraid of?

Johann Lamont 的头像

Johann Lamont1 年前

@lynseybews Toe curling, cringe making idiocy. Dressed up as knowledge of the law. Bad enough to have a briefing with these ‘lines to take’. Worse still is choosing to deploy them. 😳😳

55s a coming 的头像

55s a coming1 年前

@lynseybews this is swinneys isla bryson every day he looks weaker

mardibum63 的头像

mardibum631 年前

@lynseybews How can a man stand up without a spine ?

cat 的头像

cat1 年前

@lynseybews Should simply ask if he'd be happy for his wife to share a changing room with a man.

Kathleen Stock 的头像

Kathleen Stock1 年前

@lynseybews Lol!

The world has gone mad 的头像

The world has gone mad1 年前

@lynseybews Superb question. It's just so blatant now isn't it.

Gender ideology & SNP heretic 的头像

Gender ideology & SNP heretic1 年前

@lynseybews What a fool. As if the UK Supreme Court judges will be swayed by a comment from a regional administrator after hearing arguments, in court from experienced legal advocates. This ain't going away.

Lisa Mackenzie 的头像

Lisa Mackenzie1 年前

@lynseybews Yes! Excellent questioning by Lynsey (and @ginadavidsonlbc).

nebulous dog whistle at the counter 的头像

nebulous dog whistle at the counter1 年前

@lynseybews 🤫🤭

相关视频

"The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in The Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex." 🙌🎉🥳

"The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in The Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex." 🙌🎉🥳

Genevieve Gluck

136,993 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: It's the "unanimous decision" of this court that the terms "woman" and "sex" refer to a biological woman and biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, Lord Hodge says in the Supreme Court Live updates ➡️ 📺 Sky 501 and YouTube

BREAKING: It's the "unanimous decision" of this court that the terms "woman" and "sex" refer to a biological woman and biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, Lord Hodge says in the Supreme Court Live updates ➡️ 📺 Sky 501 and YouTube

Sky News

2,126,249 次观看 • 1 年前

Ant Lexa, who plays Abbi Montgomery in the hit Netflix series Sex Education, says it breaks her heart that the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

Ant Lexa, who plays Abbi Montgomery in the hit Netflix series Sex Education, says it breaks her heart that the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

Channel 4 News

391,640 次观看 • 1 年前

The shock decision by the Full Federal Court in Giggle v Tickle means women no longer have the right to gather in their own spaces without the presence of biological men. For the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls, as well as men and boys, single-sex spaces must be protected. Biological sex matters. The Sex Discrimination Act as it’s been interpreted means gender ideology trumps biological reality. That’s profoundly wrong and unjust, and the law must be changed. A future Coalition government under Angus Taylor’s leadership will do just that. Sall Grover is a champion for women and women’s rights. She is a champion for common sense. Sall Grover needs our support more than ever before. ➡️

The shock decision by the Full Federal Court in Giggle v Tickle means women no longer have the right to gather in their own spaces without the presence of biological men. For the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls, as well as men and boys, single-sex spaces must be protected. Biological sex matters. The Sex Discrimination Act as it’s been interpreted means gender ideology trumps biological reality. That’s profoundly wrong and unjust, and the law must be changed. A future Coalition government under Angus Taylor’s leadership will do just that. Sall Grover is a champion for women and women’s rights. She is a champion for common sense. Sall Grover needs our support more than ever before. ➡️

Senator Sarah Henderson

15,057 次观看 • 4 个月前

The trans community ‘just wants to be left alone’ says author and activist, Charlie Craggs after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

The trans community ‘just wants to be left alone’ says author and activist, Charlie Craggs after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

Channel 4 News

529,744 次观看 • 1 年前

Today marks the first anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling which clarified that the terms ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Equality Act refer to biological sex, biological woman and biological man. This landmark judgment vindicated countless men and women who were silenced or shut down for expressing the lawfully held, gender-critical view that women are adult human females. While the Government’s Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, claimed this week that the Government has always defended single-sex spaces, where was their support for women like Sandie Peggie, Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses? Gender-critical cases remain the single largest category of cases we deal with at the Free Speech Union. Following Maya Forstater’s victory in 2021, and now this Supreme Court ruling, there is no excuse for discriminating against people who express gender-critical views. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw 👇

Today marks the first anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling which clarified that the terms ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Equality Act refer to biological sex, biological woman and biological man. This landmark judgment vindicated countless men and women who were silenced or shut down for expressing the lawfully held, gender-critical view that women are adult human females. While the Government’s Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, claimed this week that the Government has always defended single-sex spaces, where was their support for women like Sandie Peggie, Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses? Gender-critical cases remain the single largest category of cases we deal with at the Free Speech Union. Following Maya Forstater’s victory in 2021, and now this Supreme Court ruling, there is no excuse for discriminating against people who express gender-critical views. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw 👇

The Free Speech Union

13,255 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Nearly a year ago the Supreme Court ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex only. 🥀 Yet Labour ministers are still dragging their heels and refusing to act. 👇 Does this government actually care about protecting women and girls?

🚨 Nearly a year ago the Supreme Court ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex only. 🥀 Yet Labour ministers are still dragging their heels and refusing to act. 👇 Does this government actually care about protecting women and girls?

Natasha MS

17,053 次观看 • 7 个月前

Anas Sarwar is claiming he only voted for the GRR bill because assurances on single sex spaces were given. Here is clear evidence that he is lying. Shortly after the vote he specifically stated it had nothing to do with single sex spaces in hospitals, schools & prisons.

Anas Sarwar is claiming he only voted for the GRR bill because assurances on single sex spaces were given. Here is clear evidence that he is lying. Shortly after the vote he specifically stated it had nothing to do with single sex spaces in hospitals, schools & prisons.

MSM Monitor

36,992 次观看 • 1 年前

🤨 Yvette Cooper is already muddying the waters on the new EHRC statutory code of practice that requires single-sex spaces to be based on biological sex. The code has just come into force. It implements the 2025 Supreme Court ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex. Single-sex spaces, wards, toilets and changing rooms are for the sex recorded at birth. Full stop. Stig Abell put the simplest possible question to the Health Secretary on Times Radio: “Let’s be absolutely clear about this, single sex ward, someone who identifies as a woman but was born a man would have to go to a male side of the ward rather than a female side of the ward?” Her reply: “The guidance will be set out shortly to make sure there maybe people who will need additional provision or additional arrangements made. It’s very clear where there is single sex arrangements in place it needs to be done on the basis of biological sex.” “Additional provision.” “Additional arrangements.” This is the classic fudge. The law is clear. The code is clear. Biological sex is the criterion. Yet the moment the question becomes concrete, a male patient on a female ward, the language softens into process, guidance, special cases and future arrangements. We have seen this movie before. Clarity on paper, then endless carve-outs, risk assessments, “individual circumstances” and institutional reluctance to enforce the actual rule. Women end up sharing intimate spaces with males while officials congratulate themselves on “balancing rights”. It should be simple. If a service is single-sex, it is for that sex. People who do not belong to that sex use the opposite-sex facilities. No endless reinvention of the wheel. Instead we get the same tired pattern: pander to a tiny minority, amplify the loudest and angriest voices within it, and treat women’s privacy, safety and dignity as negotiable. The overwhelming majority of the public, and the plain wording of the law, are treated as the awkward obstacle rather than the starting point. Cooper says the law is clear. Then she immediately starts talking as if it isn’t. That is how these things get unpicked in practice. Women have every right to be sceptical.

🤨 Yvette Cooper is already muddying the waters on the new EHRC statutory code of practice that requires single-sex spaces to be based on biological sex. The code has just come into force. It implements the 2025 Supreme Court ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex. Single-sex spaces, wards, toilets and changing rooms are for the sex recorded at birth. Full stop. Stig Abell put the simplest possible question to the Health Secretary on Times Radio: “Let’s be absolutely clear about this, single sex ward, someone who identifies as a woman but was born a man would have to go to a male side of the ward rather than a female side of the ward?” Her reply: “The guidance will be set out shortly to make sure there maybe people who will need additional provision or additional arrangements made. It’s very clear where there is single sex arrangements in place it needs to be done on the basis of biological sex.” “Additional provision.” “Additional arrangements.” This is the classic fudge. The law is clear. The code is clear. Biological sex is the criterion. Yet the moment the question becomes concrete, a male patient on a female ward, the language softens into process, guidance, special cases and future arrangements. We have seen this movie before. Clarity on paper, then endless carve-outs, risk assessments, “individual circumstances” and institutional reluctance to enforce the actual rule. Women end up sharing intimate spaces with males while officials congratulate themselves on “balancing rights”. It should be simple. If a service is single-sex, it is for that sex. People who do not belong to that sex use the opposite-sex facilities. No endless reinvention of the wheel. Instead we get the same tired pattern: pander to a tiny minority, amplify the loudest and angriest voices within it, and treat women’s privacy, safety and dignity as negotiable. The overwhelming majority of the public, and the plain wording of the law, are treated as the awkward obstacle rather than the starting point. Cooper says the law is clear. Then she immediately starts talking as if it isn’t. That is how these things get unpicked in practice. Women have every right to be sceptical.

J Stewart

18,844 次观看 • 1 个月前

'I will never be safe in a man's toilet', says Isabella who is a trans woman. Thousands of single-sex spaces in the UK, like changing rooms and toilets, should be used based on biological sex, according to new guidelines that come into place today from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. The guidance says trans people should instead be offered a separate mixed-sex space. It follows a Supreme Court ruling last year that the definition of sex for the purposes of the Equality Act means biological sex - the sex of a person at birth, not the gender you identify with. While gender critical organisations welcome clarification on the law', many in the trans community and LGBTQ+ organisations feel the guidelines leave them more open to discrimination. #Trans #LGBTQ #Toilet #ChangingRoom #C4News #Channel4News

'I will never be safe in a man's toilet', says Isabella who is a trans woman. Thousands of single-sex spaces in the UK, like changing rooms and toilets, should be used based on biological sex, according to new guidelines that come into place today from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. The guidance says trans people should instead be offered a separate mixed-sex space. It follows a Supreme Court ruling last year that the definition of sex for the purposes of the Equality Act means biological sex - the sex of a person at birth, not the gender you identify with. While gender critical organisations welcome clarification on the law', many in the trans community and LGBTQ+ organisations feel the guidelines leave them more open to discrimination. #Trans #LGBTQ #Toilet #ChangingRoom #C4News #Channel4News

Channel 4 News

1,766,849 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Hey America! Women’s sports existed because the law recognized biological sex. Now the Supreme Court is being asked to deny biology. Sex is real. Erase that, and you erase women by law.

🚨 Hey America! Women’s sports existed because the law recognized biological sex. Now the Supreme Court is being asked to deny biology. Sex is real. Erase that, and you erase women by law.

Mehek Cooke🇺🇸

11,103 次观看 • 8 个月前

No one seemed to want to answer the important question regarding the M&S in Colchester. Are there any spaces just for men or just for women or are they all "gender neutral"/Mixed Sex? So I rang them. The woman in the recent video said they were "breaking the law". They aren't. Marks and Spencer told me that they have 6 changing spaces LOCATED within the Men's dept. 6 spaces LOCATED within the women's department. All 12 are mixed sex and available to everyone. They are not marked as single sex spaces because they aren't single sex. Audio recording below. I did not give Yvonne the customer services representative a hard time because I was not making a complaint, I was getting clarification and info about the store's changing provision and she is not responsible for producing Marks and Spencer policy. The company policy dictating this mixed sex changing arrangement throughout the store is legal. This is the entire problem. Women have been misled to think single-sex changing spaces have now been returned to them. That would be a lie. Marks and Spencer and others can continue to provide spaces unacceptable and unsafe to women. They can do it within the remit of the Equality Act. For women to be safe there needs to be a change to the law which insists on women having single sex space to change or go to the toilet. That has not been achieved by any court ruling or guidance around the Equality Act and GC groups who mostly applauded the recently released 'Code of Practice' know this because they are stuffed full of lawyers. The man in the video may have terrible customer service skills, he may even be prejudiced against women with GC views, but the policy is legal. Grassroots activism on behalf of women might eventually force a change from providers. It is probably all that could, because the Equality Act remains rigidly against us. Yet the grassroots have previously been frowned upon and sneered at for our shouty ways while the GC Suits "handle everything professionally". The woman in the store accused a man of "breaking the law" which he wasn't. Now we have one of the Sex Matters lawyers exposing that employee's details online. What a mess.

No one seemed to want to answer the important question regarding the M&S in Colchester. Are there any spaces just for men or just for women or are they all "gender neutral"/Mixed Sex? So I rang them. The woman in the recent video said they were "breaking the law". They aren't. Marks and Spencer told me that they have 6 changing spaces LOCATED within the Men's dept. 6 spaces LOCATED within the women's department. All 12 are mixed sex and available to everyone. They are not marked as single sex spaces because they aren't single sex. Audio recording below. I did not give Yvonne the customer services representative a hard time because I was not making a complaint, I was getting clarification and info about the store's changing provision and she is not responsible for producing Marks and Spencer policy. The company policy dictating this mixed sex changing arrangement throughout the store is legal. This is the entire problem. Women have been misled to think single-sex changing spaces have now been returned to them. That would be a lie. Marks and Spencer and others can continue to provide spaces unacceptable and unsafe to women. They can do it within the remit of the Equality Act. For women to be safe there needs to be a change to the law which insists on women having single sex space to change or go to the toilet. That has not been achieved by any court ruling or guidance around the Equality Act and GC groups who mostly applauded the recently released 'Code of Practice' know this because they are stuffed full of lawyers. The man in the video may have terrible customer service skills, he may even be prejudiced against women with GC views, but the policy is legal. Grassroots activism on behalf of women might eventually force a change from providers. It is probably all that could, because the Equality Act remains rigidly against us. Yet the grassroots have previously been frowned upon and sneered at for our shouty ways while the GC Suits "handle everything professionally". The woman in the store accused a man of "breaking the law" which he wasn't. Now we have one of the Sex Matters lawyers exposing that employee's details online. What a mess.

Jean Hatchet

93,624 次观看 • 3 个月前

"We're here to stand up for the sex-based rights of the state's most vulnerable population - our children - and ultimately end the sex-based discrimination that's happening right now in public schools all across Maine, by violating the sex-based Civil Rights of children that want single-sex opportunities and single-sex private spaces (like locker rooms, bathrooms, and showers." Maine Girl Dads leader, Leyland Streiff, speaking to Maine Policy Institute lays out what we're about, and what the ballot referendum we support ("An Act to Designate School Sports Participation & Facilities by Sex") does: ✅ Defines "SEX" as one's "biological status at birth", which is aligned to every medical org including the AMA and WPATH ✅ Designates competitive SPORTS participation in schools by Sex (male, female, and Co-Ed when a single-sex option doesn't exist) ✅ Designates private SPACES (locker rooms, bathrooms, showers) by Sex. Maine Girl Dads is a bipartisan coalition, supporting this bipartisan effort to end sex-based discrimination in our schools, and protect the sex-based Civil Rights of ALL Maine's kids. 💯 If a female wants a female-only space or sports opportunity, they're owed that by Federal Civil Rights laws that have existed for 50+ years. Fact. Anything else is discriminatory, sexist, regressive, and illegal. 💯 This effort is inclusive; nobody is banned, everybody plays. Everyone plays sports, everyone access private spaces, simply designated by Sex. 💯 Everyone has a Sex, and Sex is not Gender (definitionally, scientifically, and legally... even the AMA and WPATH agree). 💯 We respect Gender Identity while recognizing Biology. In fact, we hold the progressive idea that there is NO RIGHT WAY to be Male or Female... dress, feel, identify how you want. Sex is inclusive of everybody, regardless of their gender identity. Get involved with Protect Girls Sports In Maine and let's stop sex-based discrimination. Stand against the Civil Rights violation of children - that's happening RIGHT NOW - on the basis of their sex. This is regressive and illegal.

"We're here to stand up for the sex-based rights of the state's most vulnerable population - our children - and ultimately end the sex-based discrimination that's happening right now in public schools all across Maine, by violating the sex-based Civil Rights of children that want single-sex opportunities and single-sex private spaces (like locker rooms, bathrooms, and showers." Maine Girl Dads leader, Leyland Streiff, speaking to Maine Policy Institute lays out what we're about, and what the ballot referendum we support ("An Act to Designate School Sports Participation & Facilities by Sex") does: ✅ Defines "SEX" as one's "biological status at birth", which is aligned to every medical org including the AMA and WPATH ✅ Designates competitive SPORTS participation in schools by Sex (male, female, and Co-Ed when a single-sex option doesn't exist) ✅ Designates private SPACES (locker rooms, bathrooms, showers) by Sex. Maine Girl Dads is a bipartisan coalition, supporting this bipartisan effort to end sex-based discrimination in our schools, and protect the sex-based Civil Rights of ALL Maine's kids. 💯 If a female wants a female-only space or sports opportunity, they're owed that by Federal Civil Rights laws that have existed for 50+ years. Fact. Anything else is discriminatory, sexist, regressive, and illegal. 💯 This effort is inclusive; nobody is banned, everybody plays. Everyone plays sports, everyone access private spaces, simply designated by Sex. 💯 Everyone has a Sex, and Sex is not Gender (definitionally, scientifically, and legally... even the AMA and WPATH agree). 💯 We respect Gender Identity while recognizing Biology. In fact, we hold the progressive idea that there is NO RIGHT WAY to be Male or Female... dress, feel, identify how you want. Sex is inclusive of everybody, regardless of their gender identity. Get involved with Protect Girls Sports In Maine and let's stop sex-based discrimination. Stand against the Civil Rights violation of children - that's happening RIGHT NOW - on the basis of their sex. This is regressive and illegal.

Maine Girl Dads

12,175 次观看 • 4 个月前

Unison leader Andrea Egan appears to be in a muddle. She seems to have misunderstood who the EHRC’s draft guidance on single-sex spaces is aimed at. It is primarily directed at service providers and organisations covered by the Equality Act - not workplace toilet provision. She also appears unaware that employers already have legal responsibilities to provide suitable toilet and washing facilities under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. That aside, her video doesn’t mention women once. From a union leader whose membership is predominantly female, that is extraordinary. Women are the group most directly affected by policies on single-sex spaces, privacy and dignity. Yet their interests barely seem to feature in the discussion at all.

Unison leader Andrea Egan appears to be in a muddle. She seems to have misunderstood who the EHRC’s draft guidance on single-sex spaces is aimed at. It is primarily directed at service providers and organisations covered by the Equality Act - not workplace toilet provision. She also appears unaware that employers already have legal responsibilities to provide suitable toilet and washing facilities under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. That aside, her video doesn’t mention women once. From a union leader whose membership is predominantly female, that is extraordinary. Women are the group most directly affected by policies on single-sex spaces, privacy and dignity. Yet their interests barely seem to feature in the discussion at all.

Janet Murray

23,136 次观看 • 3 个月前