Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Killer question by ⁦Lynsey Bews⁩ because the FM can’t ride two horses at same time arguing that he stands by the Eq Act and provision for single sex spaces while his government is in court arguing against ‘sex’ in Eq Act meaning biological sex.

holyroodmandy's profile picture

mandy rhodes

24,289 subscribers

1,041,111 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von lisa keeble 😊
lisa keeble 😊vor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews Why are they all so terrified of stating that a woman is, and can only be, a biological female? What are they afraid of?

Profilbild von Johann Lamont
Johann Lamontvor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews Toe curling, cringe making idiocy. Dressed up as knowledge of the law. Bad enough to have a briefing with these ‘lines to take’. Worse still is choosing to deploy them. 😳😳

Profilbild von 55s a coming
55s a comingvor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews this is swinneys isla bryson every day he looks weaker

Profilbild von mardibum63
mardibum63vor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews How can a man stand up without a spine ?

Profilbild von cat
catvor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews Should simply ask if he'd be happy for his wife to share a changing room with a man.

Profilbild von Kathleen Stock
Kathleen Stockvor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews Lol!

Profilbild von The world has gone mad
The world has gone madvor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews Superb question. It's just so blatant now isn't it.

Profilbild von Gender ideology & SNP heretic
Gender ideology & SNP hereticvor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews What a fool. As if the UK Supreme Court judges will be swayed by a comment from a regional administrator after hearing arguments, in court from experienced legal advocates. This ain't going away.

Profilbild von Lisa Mackenzie
Lisa Mackenzievor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews Yes! Excellent questioning by Lynsey (and @ginadavidsonlbc).

Profilbild von nebulous dog whistle at the counter
nebulous dog whistle at the countervor 1 Jahr

@lynseybews 🤫🤭

Ähnliche Videos

"Gov't has recognised there's confusion/lack of awareness about the Eq Act’s single-sex exceptions & how to apply them. Does Minister agree updated EHRC Code is needed asap to make explicitly clear that the Act provides for single-sex services for biological women?" Mary Glindon
1:15

"Gov't has recognised there's confusion/lack of awareness about the Eq Act’s single-sex exceptions & how to apply them. Does Minister agree updated EHRC Code is needed asap to make explicitly clear that the Act provides for single-sex services for biological women?" Mary Glindon

LabourWomen’sDeclaration 🦖

49,195 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in The Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex." 🙌🎉🥳
2:25

"The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in The Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex." 🙌🎉🥳

Genevieve Gluck

136,526 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: It's the "unanimous decision" of this court that the terms "woman" and "sex" refer to a biological woman and biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, Lord Hodge says in the Supreme Court Live updates ➡️ 📺 Sky 501 and YouTube
1:50

BREAKING: It's the "unanimous decision" of this court that the terms "woman" and "sex" refer to a biological woman and biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, Lord Hodge says in the Supreme Court Live updates ➡️ 📺 Sky 501 and YouTube

Sky News

2,125,015 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ant Lexa, who plays Abbi Montgomery in the hit Netflix series Sex Education, says it breaks her heart that the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
0:49

Ant Lexa, who plays Abbi Montgomery in the hit Netflix series Sex Education, says it breaks her heart that the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

Channel 4 News

391,388 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

'The overall judgement from the Supreme Court sets beyond doubt the importance of single sex spaces for women' Bridget Phillipson, Education Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities, spoke to #BBCBreakfast about the Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law
1:22

'The overall judgement from the Supreme Court sets beyond doubt the importance of single sex spaces for women' Bridget Phillipson, Education Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities, spoke to #BBCBreakfast about the Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law

BBC Breakfast

20,102 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The shock decision by the Full Federal Court in Giggle v Tickle means women no longer have the right to gather in their own spaces without the presence of biological men. For the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls, as well as men and boys, single-sex spaces must be protected. Biological sex matters. The Sex Discrimination Act as it’s been interpreted means gender ideology trumps biological reality. That’s profoundly wrong and unjust, and the law must be changed. A future Coalition government under Angus Taylor’s leadership will do just that. Sall Grover is a champion for women and women’s rights. She is a champion for common sense. Sall Grover needs our support more than ever before. ➡️
1:06

The shock decision by the Full Federal Court in Giggle v Tickle means women no longer have the right to gather in their own spaces without the presence of biological men. For the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls, as well as men and boys, single-sex spaces must be protected. Biological sex matters. The Sex Discrimination Act as it’s been interpreted means gender ideology trumps biological reality. That’s profoundly wrong and unjust, and the law must be changed. A future Coalition government under Angus Taylor’s leadership will do just that. Sall Grover is a champion for women and women’s rights. She is a champion for common sense. Sall Grover needs our support more than ever before. ➡️

Senator Sarah Henderson

15,037 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The trans community ‘just wants to be left alone’ says author and activist, Charlie Craggs after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
1:20

The trans community ‘just wants to be left alone’ says author and activist, Charlie Craggs after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

Channel 4 News

529,744 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Today marks the first anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling which clarified that the terms ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Equality Act refer to biological sex, biological woman and biological man. This landmark judgment vindicated countless men and women who were silenced or shut down for expressing the lawfully held, gender-critical view that women are adult human females. While the Government’s Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, claimed this week that the Government has always defended single-sex spaces, where was their support for women like Sandie Peggie, Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses? Gender-critical cases remain the single largest category of cases we deal with at the Free Speech Union. Following Maya Forstater’s victory in 2021, and now this Supreme Court ruling, there is no excuse for discriminating against people who express gender-critical views. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw 👇
1:20

Today marks the first anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling which clarified that the terms ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Equality Act refer to biological sex, biological woman and biological man. This landmark judgment vindicated countless men and women who were silenced or shut down for expressing the lawfully held, gender-critical view that women are adult human females. While the Government’s Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, claimed this week that the Government has always defended single-sex spaces, where was their support for women like Sandie Peggie, Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses? Gender-critical cases remain the single largest category of cases we deal with at the Free Speech Union. Following Maya Forstater’s victory in 2021, and now this Supreme Court ruling, there is no excuse for discriminating against people who express gender-critical views. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw 👇

The Free Speech Union

13,255 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 Nearly a year ago the Supreme Court ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex only. 🥀 Yet Labour ministers are still dragging their heels and refusing to act. 👇 Does this government actually care about protecting women and girls?
1:38

🚨 Nearly a year ago the Supreme Court ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex only. 🥀 Yet Labour ministers are still dragging their heels and refusing to act. 👇 Does this government actually care about protecting women and girls?

Natasha MS

17,053 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Anas Sarwar is claiming he only voted for the GRR bill because assurances on single sex spaces were given. Here is clear evidence that he is lying. Shortly after the vote he specifically stated it had nothing to do with single sex spaces in hospitals, schools & prisons.
0:26

Anas Sarwar is claiming he only voted for the GRR bill because assurances on single sex spaces were given. Here is clear evidence that he is lying. Shortly after the vote he specifically stated it had nothing to do with single sex spaces in hospitals, schools & prisons.

MSM Monitor

36,992 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Hey America! Women’s sports existed because the law recognized biological sex. Now the Supreme Court is being asked to deny biology. Sex is real. Erase that, and you erase women by law.
2:55

🚨 Hey America! Women’s sports existed because the law recognized biological sex. Now the Supreme Court is being asked to deny biology. Sex is real. Erase that, and you erase women by law.

Mehek Cooke🇺🇸

11,103 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

No one seemed to want to answer the important question regarding the M&S in Colchester. Are there any spaces just for men or just for women or are they all "gender neutral"/Mixed Sex? So I rang them. The woman in the recent video said they were "breaking the law". They aren't. Marks and Spencer told me that they have 6 changing spaces LOCATED within the Men's dept. 6 spaces LOCATED within the women's department. All 12 are mixed sex and available to everyone. They are not marked as single sex spaces because they aren't single sex. Audio recording below. I did not give Yvonne the customer services representative a hard time because I was not making a complaint, I was getting clarification and info about the store's changing provision and she is not responsible for producing Marks and Spencer policy. The company policy dictating this mixed sex changing arrangement throughout the store is legal. This is the entire problem. Women have been misled to think single-sex changing spaces have now been returned to them. That would be a lie. Marks and Spencer and others can continue to provide spaces unacceptable and unsafe to women. They can do it within the remit of the Equality Act. For women to be safe there needs to be a change to the law which insists on women having single sex space to change or go to the toilet. That has not been achieved by any court ruling or guidance around the Equality Act and GC groups who mostly applauded the recently released 'Code of Practice' know this because they are stuffed full of lawyers. The man in the video may have terrible customer service skills, he may even be prejudiced against women with GC views, but the policy is legal. Grassroots activism on behalf of women might eventually force a change from providers. It is probably all that could, because the Equality Act remains rigidly against us. Yet the grassroots have previously been frowned upon and sneered at for our shouty ways while the GC Suits "handle everything professionally". The woman in the store accused a man of "breaking the law" which he wasn't. Now we have one of the Sex Matters lawyers exposing that employee's details online. What a mess.
3:08

No one seemed to want to answer the important question regarding the M&S in Colchester. Are there any spaces just for men or just for women or are they all "gender neutral"/Mixed Sex? So I rang them. The woman in the recent video said they were "breaking the law". They aren't. Marks and Spencer told me that they have 6 changing spaces LOCATED within the Men's dept. 6 spaces LOCATED within the women's department. All 12 are mixed sex and available to everyone. They are not marked as single sex spaces because they aren't single sex. Audio recording below. I did not give Yvonne the customer services representative a hard time because I was not making a complaint, I was getting clarification and info about the store's changing provision and she is not responsible for producing Marks and Spencer policy. The company policy dictating this mixed sex changing arrangement throughout the store is legal. This is the entire problem. Women have been misled to think single-sex changing spaces have now been returned to them. That would be a lie. Marks and Spencer and others can continue to provide spaces unacceptable and unsafe to women. They can do it within the remit of the Equality Act. For women to be safe there needs to be a change to the law which insists on women having single sex space to change or go to the toilet. That has not been achieved by any court ruling or guidance around the Equality Act and GC groups who mostly applauded the recently released 'Code of Practice' know this because they are stuffed full of lawyers. The man in the video may have terrible customer service skills, he may even be prejudiced against women with GC views, but the policy is legal. Grassroots activism on behalf of women might eventually force a change from providers. It is probably all that could, because the Equality Act remains rigidly against us. Yet the grassroots have previously been frowned upon and sneered at for our shouty ways while the GC Suits "handle everything professionally". The woman in the store accused a man of "breaking the law" which he wasn't. Now we have one of the Sex Matters lawyers exposing that employee's details online. What a mess.

Jean Hatchet

93,498 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Unison leader Andrea Egan appears to be in a muddle. She seems to have misunderstood who the EHRC’s draft guidance on single-sex spaces is aimed at. It is primarily directed at service providers and organisations covered by the Equality Act - not workplace toilet provision. She also appears unaware that employers already have legal responsibilities to provide suitable toilet and washing facilities under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. That aside, her video doesn’t mention women once. From a union leader whose membership is predominantly female, that is extraordinary. Women are the group most directly affected by policies on single-sex spaces, privacy and dignity. Yet their interests barely seem to feature in the discussion at all.
1:40

Unison leader Andrea Egan appears to be in a muddle. She seems to have misunderstood who the EHRC’s draft guidance on single-sex spaces is aimed at. It is primarily directed at service providers and organisations covered by the Equality Act - not workplace toilet provision. She also appears unaware that employers already have legal responsibilities to provide suitable toilet and washing facilities under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. That aside, her video doesn’t mention women once. From a union leader whose membership is predominantly female, that is extraordinary. Women are the group most directly affected by policies on single-sex spaces, privacy and dignity. Yet their interests barely seem to feature in the discussion at all.

Janet Murray

23,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Under the Equality Act, the default position is that services must be open to everyone. If you want to discriminate to separate provision, you need to rely on a specific exception to do so. There are exceptions for single-sex services, but they need to be provided based on biological sex for the exception to apply
1:03

Under the Equality Act, the default position is that services must be open to everyone. If you want to discriminate to separate provision, you need to rely on a specific exception to do so. There are exceptions for single-sex services, but they need to be provided based on biological sex for the exception to apply

Michael Foran

13,672 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat