Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
🎥 : Kim Soohyun’s Agency Issues Emergency Statement Addressing Allegations Following reports by YouTube channel Garosero Research Institute (Gaseyeon) regarding Kim Soohyun’s alleged involvement in the late Kim Saeron’s struggles, his agency, Gold Medalist, has urgently released a statement that was originally scheduled for next week. Gold Medalist stated,... show more
23,379 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
4 Comments
KIM SOO HYUN’S OFFICIAL STATEMENT! Goldmedalist Agency announced on March 13th, “We will reveal our position next week based on clear evidence to set the record straight and respond to groundless rumors,” But released a statement just one day later, saying that psychological pressure on Kim Soo-hyun continues. - The full text is as follows - #KimSooHyun #WeStandWithKimSooHyun
Clarifying the Dating Rumors Between Kim Soohyun and Kim Saeron Gold Medalist firmly states that Kim Soohyun and Kim Saeron dated from the summer of 2019 to the fall of 2020—after Kim Saeron had become an adult. The claim that Kim Soohyun dated her while she was a minor is completely false. Regarding the photos in question: The photo shared by Kim Saeron on her Instagram Story (March 24, 2024) and the one aired by Garosero Research Institute (March 11, 2025) were taken on the same day in the winter of 2020, during their relationship. The outfit Kim Saeron wore in the image was from a brand that released it in June 2019, further confirming that the photo could not have been taken before she became an adult. Ga Se-yeon’s claim that the photo was taken in 2016 is entirely baseless, as Kim Soohyun and Kim Saeron were not in a relationship at that time. Additionally, another photo released by Ga Se-yeon on March 12, 2025, was taken on December 24, 2019 (Christmas Eve). The metadata of the original file confirms this date. The photo shared on March 13, 2025, was also from the same day, as proven by the identical outfits worn by both individuals. False Narrative by Ga Se-yeon Gold Medalist emphasizes that every photo used to claim that Kim Soohyun dated Kim Saeron while she was a minor was actually taken after she became an adult. The 2016 photo that Ga Se-yeon insists on does not exist, as the two were not romantically involved at that time. With this, Gold Medalist strongly refutes the false allegations and urges the public not to be misled by manipulated information.
Gold Medalist’s Handling of Kim Saeron’s Penalty Fees: Legal and Financial Realities Gold Medalist followed proper legal procedures in handling Kim Saeron’s remaining debt, ensuring compliance with financial regulations while avoiding legal risks. Despite her attempts to resume her career, Kim Saeron struggled to repay the remaining debt from her drunk driving incident. Recognizing her financial inability to settle the amount, Gold Medalist officially wrote off the outstanding debt as a financial loss in December 2023. This decision is documented in the company’s April 1, 2024, audit report, confirming that all claims against Kim Saeron were fully written off. Throughout the process, Gold Medalist adhered to proper legal procedures. If the company had arbitrarily covered the penalty fees, its executives could have faced accusations of breach of fiduciary duty (embezzlement in business), as such costs might not have been recognized as legitimate company expenses. Similarly, lending money to Kim Saeron without formal documentation could have been considered an unlawful financial benefit. At the start of 2024, during Gold Medalist’s financial audit, a decision had to be made regarding Kim Saeron’s outstanding debt. Legal and accounting advisors cautioned that simply writing off the debt without formal collection efforts could be interpreted as an unjustified exemption, potentially harming the company financially and raising further fiduciary concerns. To address this, Gold Medalist had to prove that Kim Saeron was in a ‘non-recoverable’ financial state, meaning she had no means to repay the debt. Additionally, the company needed to demonstrate that it had made reasonable efforts to collect the amount before writing it off. #KimSoohyun #김수현
Last year the dating rumour was denied by the company itself and now they are changing it to "yes they were dating". Like wtf??? Who are you trying to fool heh???.
Related Videos
![[ENG] #KimSoohyun’s attorney, Ko Sangrok, on today’s MBC Morning Call. ⸻ Q. This is Today Morning Call. Kim Seui, who ran the YouTube channel Garosero Research Institute, has been arrested. The charges are spreading false information related to actor Kim Soohyun, and manipulating the recording files and messenger conversations that were presented as evidence. Through Kim Soohyun’s lawyer, we will hear about the key issues of this case and the tasks ahead. Welcome. Q. Gaseyeon’s Kim Seui arrested. What exactly were the charges? As has been widely reported, the charges include defamation by stating false facts, threats, unauthorized distribution of recorded material, and violation of the stalking punishment law. The defamation part is the most important here. The main point is that actor Kim Soohyun had a long-term relationship with the late Kim Saeron since she was a minor. And that through his agency, he pressured the late person to repay a debt, leading her to her death. False information of this kind was spread, and to support it, KakaoTalk conversations and the late person’s voice, among other evidence, were allegedly fabricated. Q. Some analysts say it is unusual to be arrested on defamation charges like these. Is there a reason it went as far as arrest? First of all, the criminal charges are serious and the damage is very great. And actually, the most important factor among arrest conditions is the concern of destroying evidence. This case is not just a concern of destroying evidence. The very core of the crime is evidence fabrication. It is a crime where new evidence was created to support false information. Also, because there are multiple people involved, there is a possibility of them aligning their stories, so the court seems to have judged that the risk of destroying evidence is high. That appears to be how it was determined. It may be difficult to ask specifically and in detail because of secondary harm, but there is a charge that Kim Seui fabricated audio related to Kim Saeron.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2059794066993500263/amplify_video_thumb/2059792320443367424/img/Cgu-jg7vF0IBXf0i.jpg)
![[ENG] JTBC Newsroom: Prosecution Found Audio Used to Accuse #KimSoohyun Shows Signs of Manipulation Recently, Kim Seui, the head of Garo Sero Institute who was recently arrested and indicted, has insisted that the voice of the late actress Kim Saeron, in which she says she dated actor Kim Soohyun when she was a minor, was not manipulated. But from JTBC reporting, we found that the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Forensic Science Division concluded that there were signs it had been manipulated. After even analyzing the frequency bands of the audio file, they found signs that it had been pieced together. In May last year, Kim Seui, the head of Garo Sero Institute, released an audio file, saying it was a conversation the late actress Kim Saeron had with someone she knew. “Yes, I dated Soohyun oppa.” “You might think I’m crazy and not believe me, but we started dating when I was in middle school, and we broke up after I went to college.” “Middle school?” “Yes.” Kim Soohyun’s side claimed it was a manipulated audio file, but Kim Seui denied it until the very end. “The private company hired by Kim Soohyun’s side said it was AI manipulation.” “Are you saying you’re going to believe the private company hired by Kim Soohyun’s side?” After taking over the case, the prosecution analyzed the audio file again through a security investigation. The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Forensic Science Division handled it directly. The prosecution found interruptions in the voice signal and that the frequency bands of the male and female voices were different. They concluded that it was possible the woman’s voice had been played back from another device and then recorded again. In other words, the man claiming to be the informant allegedly played a manipulated voice of Kim Saeron that he had made separately, then re-recorded it to make it sound like they were having a conversation. Procedures are also underway to recover all the profits Kim Seui earned through this alleged manipulation. The Crime Proceeds Recovery Division of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office is tracking down all of Kim Seui’s donation accounts and examining them closely. Since there are so many victims of Garo Sero Institute and so many different cases are involved, it is reported that the process of recovering the criminal proceeds is quite complicated. Jeong Seongho, South Korea’s Minister of Justice, said they will stop cyber wrecker crimes by thoroughly recovering criminal proceeds and leaving not even a single won behind. Meanwhile, Kim Seui, who was also indicted on charges of stalking and threatening YouTuber Tzuyang, did not appear for his first trial yesterday. The court gave a strong warning, saying it could issue a warrant to bring him to court.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2070461538683551882/amplify_video_thumb/2070461365920419840/img/pbiWWWecpONImx0S.jpg)
![[0630] #KimSoohyun’s Long-Awaited Comeback Is Finally Here The way people look at actor Kim Soohyun is with sympathy. That is because he was made to carry an “unfair false accusation” based on manipulated information, and in reality had to stop almost all of his activities. Recently, the situation has changed a lot after Garosero Research Institute CEO Kim Seui was arrested, indicted, and sent to trial. One is the news of actor Kim Soohyun’s official return in July, and the other is additional legal action surrounding Garosero Research Institute CEO Kim Seui. Looking at these two cases together, one saying naturally comes to mind. It is “사필귀정” (sapilgwijong), meaning that in the end, everything returns to what is right. Kim Soohyun is scheduled to officially resume his activities after about one year through a commercial shoot for a Philippine fashion brand on July 14. During the past year, it is known that he spent time recharging by taking care of his health, studying acting, and watching projects, while making almost no public appearances. Also, the damages lawsuit worth about 3.9 billion won filed by Frombio has had its hearing, which was originally scheduled for July, postponed to August. The court decided that it needed to more closely examine the reason for the alleged breach of the contractual obligation to maintain dignity, along with the related evidence, and will continue the hearing after receiving additional materials. In other words, the legal judgment has not been completed yet. Even so, Kim Soohyun stopped almost all of his activities for nearly a year and carried a huge social burden. Now that his official schedule is starting again, it can at least be seen as a sign that the environment for him to continue his activities is slowly recovering. Looking back at the past year, many people treated Kim Soohyun as if he were guilty based only on claims that had not been confirmed. But as time has passed, the legal process has moved forward step by step, while the people suspected of spreading false information are instead finding themselves facing legal responsibility. Meanwhile, Kim Soohyun has endured a long break while preparing for his return. Not every trial has ended yet. But at least based on how things have unfolded so far, it can be seen as another reminder that the law and evidence matter more than a rushed trial by public opinion. The saying “사필귀정” (sapilgwijong) is not about deciding the outcome in advance. Rather, it means that in the end, the truth should be revealed through the law and objective evidence. Kim Soohyun’s return can be seen as the natural next step of resuming his work as an actor, separate from the legal process, while CEO Kim Seui will have the various legal responsibilities surrounding him judged through the judicial process. Going forward, what matters is not emotions or guesses, but facts, evidence, and the court’s judgment. It seems necessary to keep watching until the court reaches its final conclusion.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2071808764358082764/amplify_video_thumb/2071808681910337536/img/ig77eRo4UrRrbH3W.jpg)
![[FULL TEXT] MBC Straight — The Expose of Garosero Institute. ⸻ Kim Seui, the head of the YouTube channel Garosero Institute, had an arrest warrant requested against him on charges including defaming actor Kim Soohyun in connection with the late actress Kim Saeron’s death. He strongly denied all charges, calling the arrest warrant itself a complete fraud. “The arrest warrant request is clearly packed with outright false facts. I admit nothing. This is an intentional and hastily thrown-together arrest warrant request.” The police concluded that Kim Seui’s conduct was extremely poor in character, noting in particular that he manipulated KakaoTalk conversations that had been exchanged with Kim Saeron, and that he publicly released a voice recording made with AI as though it were real, without any verification. Q. “Did you properly verify the tipster from the Garosero side?” Kim Seui: “Of course.” Q. “How did you carry out that verification?” Kim Seui: “That verification was done by the National Forensic Service.” Q. “No. Did you do it yourself, by any chance?” Kim Seui: “We, at our, at Gaseyeon, on our own, this…What is your name?” Q. “I am Lim Myungchan.” Kim Seui: “Yes, yes. So, MBC, then. Yes. Right now you can clearly see that SBS and MBC are…” Q. “I am asking whether you properly verified the tip.” Kim Seui: “I will take it as our verification having been done by the National Forensic Service.” However, though Kim Seui claimed the verification had been done by the National Forensic Service, the entity that actually requested the verification was the police, and the National Forensic Service’s conclusion was that it could not be verified because the original was not available. Kim Seui was confident the arrest warrant would be rejected, but the court, finding there was a risk of evidence destruction and flight, issued the warrant. He also filed for a review of the legality of his arrest, arguing the detention decision was unjust, but the court rejected that as well and maintained the detention. Yu Hyunjae, Professor of Mass Communication at Sogang University said: “Beyond fake news, now I see they actually manufacture things. This person has shown very clearly just how far someone who has given up all moral standards can go in terms of the scenario they will run, and the level of crime they can commit. So I believe that to the extent society allows, an extremely heavy punishment must be imposed.” The Garosero Institute YouTube channel has 1 million subscribers and has been making money through provocative claims and videos targeting politicians, celebrities, and other public figures. In the process, countless people have had their privacy and personal dignity violated and suffered serious harm. Because of this, the Garosero Institute has been widely condemned as a social weapon.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2066179026302148612/amplify_video_thumb/2066177466788626432/img/98tkOxuVf8Ukz_Ps.jpg)
![[Video] 20251217 | YouTube Lawyer’s Analysis Video - Translation “Kim Sae-ron Recording Deemed ‘Inconclusive’ by the National Forensic Service — Does It Have Legal Evidentiary Value?” Hello, this is Attorney Jo Gi-hyun, representative of Daehan Jungang. Regarding the audio recording released by Kim Se-ui of Garosero, which has been presented as evidence to support the claim that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in inappropriate relations with Kim Sae-ron, the National Forensic Service (NFS) has concluded that it is “impossible to determine” whether the recording was manipulated. If this recording is classified as “inconclusive,” how should the legal disputes surrounding Kim Soo-hyun be addressed, and how are they likely to be handled? This recording attempts to prove that there was an inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron. However, if it is not even possible to determine whether the recording is authentic or fabricated, then the recording itself inherently suffers from a failure to function properly as evidence. From a legal structural standpoint, this means that it is not Kim Soo-hyun who must prove his innocence, but rather the party attacking him must prove the existence of immoral conduct. Under these circumstances, the National Forensic Service’s conclusion of “inconclusive” actually places Kim Soo-hyun in a more favorable legal position. Let us examine this more specifically. Kim Soo-hyun has filed a criminal complaint against Kim Se-ui on the grounds of defamation through the dissemination of false information. In response, Kim Se-ui’s side asserts that Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had an inappropriate relationship and has submitted this audio recording as evidence. In other words, Kim Se-ui’s position is as follows: Even if the formal elements of defamation are satisfied, the content he disclosed is not false, and its disclosure was necessary in the public interest because it reflects the truth. From Kim Soo-hyun’s perspective, since the National Forensic Service did not definitively conclude that the recording was manipulated, there may, on a formal level, remain some degree of uncertainty as to whether Kim Se-ui was spreading false information or stating the truth. However, the fundamental issue is this: The party who initiated the attack is Kim Se-ui, and the core of his allegation is that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in immoral and improper conduct. The central piece of evidence supporting this allegation is precisely this audio recording. Yet now, even the authenticity of this crucial evidence cannot be determined. This means that the content asserted by Kim Se-ui carries a high likelihood of being interpreted as false information. From a civil law perspective, this issue becomes even more critical. Currently, multiple companies and advertisers have filed large-scale damage claims against Kim Soo-hyun, citing the alleged inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron as the basis for their lawsuits. But the problem is this: The core evidence used to determine whether such an inappropriate relationship existed—the audio recording—cannot be authenticated even by the National Forensic Service. Under these circumstances, how much probative value can this recording truly have in civil litigation? Especially in today’s reality, where AI-based synthesis and manipulation technologies are rapidly advancing, it is absolutely unacceptable in legal disputes to criminalize, demonize, and effectively put someone on trial based solely on materials that are known to carry the possibility of fabrication or manipulation. #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #김수현 #KimSooHyun #金秀賢 #キムスヒョン #คิมซูฮยอน](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2001309094012199044/amplify_video_thumb/2001307712605564928/img/kAIJB-hz2DsW1fZL.jpg)
Sensitive content
Ray is the husband of Kim, who we maintain was groomed into a verbal and erotic relationship with Mike Brown when he was her pastor. Kim's daughter is Jordan. Both of them sent me letters this week asking me to read them online and publish them. The Bible says that we are to be a voice for those without a voice (Prov 31:8). Mike Brown said that he and Kim were peers. The truth is, when he began to groom her in earnest, he was her senior pastor and her husband's employer. Yes, this was SA from her pastor. However, in his first comments, Mike Brown described his relationship with Kim as her being the guilty one. Neither Ray nor Jordan has anything close to the reach that Dr Brown has. And they don't have a friend like Heather Schott, willing to give them an opportunity to respond. We will do our best here. We will later publish the full text of their letters.
Ron Cantor
57,036 views • 1 year ago
Sensitive content
A condensed version of the full 40-minute hearing in the Washington Supreme Court on June 23, discussing trans-identified male inmate Bryan "Amber" Kim's request to be transferred back into women's prison WCCW. Kim was removed from WCCW and sent to a men's prison after he had sexual encounters with two vulnerable women, one of whom was his cellmate. All parties acknowledged that Kim did have sex with a female inmate and that consent while incarcerated is disputed. Kim had claimed it was his human right to continue in sexual activity with female inmates. None of the parties acknowledged that Bryan Kim is a man, serving a life sentence for the brutal double homicide of his parents, which he blamed on his "gender dysphoria." Kim had previously been engaging in sexual activity in a men's prison before he was transferred to WCCW. Counsel for DOC: Emma Grunberg Counsel for ACLU: Adrien Leavitt
Genevieve Gluck
75,179 views • 1 month ago
