Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 Kim Witczak’s husband was given a 3-week sample pack of Zoloft for insomnia. Five weeks later, he took his own life. Only afterward did she learn the FDA had already held hearings in 1991 on antidepressants linked to suicide and violence. No warning had been given. For the... past 22 years, Witczak has fought for stronger drug safety warnings — including nine years serving on an FDA advisory committee. What she discovered shocked her. Clinical trials for psychiatric drugs are largely designed and controlled by the drug companies themselves. The goal is getting the product approved — not fully understanding the harms. Those harms often only emerge after millions of people are exposed. That’s the intersection of psychiatric drugs, vaccines, and many other medical products. The same system approves them all. And too often, people only learn about the risks after the damage is done. Some never learn at all.show more

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

44,775 subscribers

13,660 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Professor Peter Gøtzsche estimates that “prescription drugs are the leading cause of death, ahead of heart disease and cancer.” “Psychiatric drugs … are the third-leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer.” “It would be better if we took all [psychiatric drugs] off the market.” “The way people use psychiatric drugs definitely causes much more harm than benefit.” “Psychiatric drugs can be useful in acute situations … but doctors often use psychiatric drugs for many years to the same patients, and that’s definitely harmful.” “The mantra is that drugs are safe and effective.” “This is an impossibility.” “If a drug has benefits, it will always harm some people, so nothing can be both safe and effective.” “It’s only a question about how frequent are the harms and how serious are they compared to the benefits.” Dr. Josef Prof. Peter C Gøtzsche

Professor Peter Gøtzsche estimates that “prescription drugs are the leading cause of death, ahead of heart disease and cancer.” “Psychiatric drugs … are the third-leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer.” “It would be better if we took all [psychiatric drugs] off the market.” “The way people use psychiatric drugs definitely causes much more harm than benefit.” “Psychiatric drugs can be useful in acute situations … but doctors often use psychiatric drugs for many years to the same patients, and that’s definitely harmful.” “The mantra is that drugs are safe and effective.” “This is an impossibility.” “If a drug has benefits, it will always harm some people, so nothing can be both safe and effective.” “It’s only a question about how frequent are the harms and how serious are they compared to the benefits.” Dr. Josef Prof. Peter C Gøtzsche

Holden Culotta

35,622 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

“It’s about 17% of the population…on SSRIs.” “When they were tested and they got approval, there was an assumption that you would use them for maybe a couple of months to stabilize your life.” “Once you get on them, it is very difficult to get off.” “The withdrawal in some cases takes not weeks, not months, but years.” “We have directed [the] FDA now to put on the label protocols for withdrawal and warnings.” “I’m not telling people not to use psychiatric drugs.” RFK Jr. makes clear a few things in this clip: 1. He is not taking away anyone’s psychiatric drugs, despite how the media has portrayed him. 2. HHS is finally recognizing the seriousness of psychiatric drug withdrawal and the need for better informed consent around these drugs. Adam Carolla

“It’s about 17% of the population…on SSRIs.” “When they were tested and they got approval, there was an assumption that you would use them for maybe a couple of months to stabilize your life.” “Once you get on them, it is very difficult to get off.” “The withdrawal in some cases takes not weeks, not months, but years.” “We have directed [the] FDA now to put on the label protocols for withdrawal and warnings.” “I’m not telling people not to use psychiatric drugs.” RFK Jr. makes clear a few things in this clip: 1. He is not taking away anyone’s psychiatric drugs, despite how the media has portrayed him. 2. HHS is finally recognizing the seriousness of psychiatric drug withdrawal and the need for better informed consent around these drugs. Adam Carolla

Laura Delano

14,076 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The foundation of modern psychiatric medicine is based on a timeline that will stun you. Before a drug like Prozac, Zoloft, or Abilify is approved for millions, how long do you think it's studied for safety and efficacy? Five years? Ten? The answer: Six to eight weeks. That’s the average length of the clinical trials used for FDA approval. As Laura Delano's research into drug labels reveals, these substances are deemed "safe and effective" for long-term public use based on a handful of short-term, company-selected studies. This creates a devastating gap: these drugs have zero evidence base for long-term use, yet countless individuals remain on them for decades. We are conducting a mass, unregulated experiment, and most people taking the pills have no idea.

The foundation of modern psychiatric medicine is based on a timeline that will stun you. Before a drug like Prozac, Zoloft, or Abilify is approved for millions, how long do you think it's studied for safety and efficacy? Five years? Ten? The answer: Six to eight weeks. That’s the average length of the clinical trials used for FDA approval. As Laura Delano's research into drug labels reveals, these substances are deemed "safe and effective" for long-term public use based on a handful of short-term, company-selected studies. This creates a devastating gap: these drugs have zero evidence base for long-term use, yet countless individuals remain on them for decades. We are conducting a mass, unregulated experiment, and most people taking the pills have no idea.

Camus

57,066 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Lindsey Clancy was placed on a psychiatric drug with no FDA approval for postpartum depression. Within 48 hours, she hadn't slept at all. Doctors abruptly stopped the drug, itself a dangerous move, then added a benzodiazepine and Benadryl on top of it. Nobody had tested whether she could actually metabolize these medications. Specific genetic variants affecting drug metabolism are linked to homicidal thoughts, suicidal ideation, and akathisia, and clinical psychologist Dr. Roger McFillin says the onset "can happen immediately." In under four months, Clancy went from one prescription to 13 drugs. "The more drugs that you enter into the system, the body, and then you stop them and you start them and you increase doses, you are increasing the likelihood of an adverse event," Dr. Roger McFillin says, adding that "drug induced homicides do occur, especially within these psychiatric drugs." Tracy Thurman

Lindsey Clancy was placed on a psychiatric drug with no FDA approval for postpartum depression. Within 48 hours, she hadn't slept at all. Doctors abruptly stopped the drug, itself a dangerous move, then added a benzodiazepine and Benadryl on top of it. Nobody had tested whether she could actually metabolize these medications. Specific genetic variants affecting drug metabolism are linked to homicidal thoughts, suicidal ideation, and akathisia, and clinical psychologist Dr. Roger McFillin says the onset "can happen immediately." In under four months, Clancy went from one prescription to 13 drugs. "The more drugs that you enter into the system, the body, and then you stop them and you start them and you increase doses, you are increasing the likelihood of an adverse event," Dr. Roger McFillin says, adding that "drug induced homicides do occur, especially within these psychiatric drugs." Tracy Thurman

The HighWire

94,438 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“If the FDA had enforced the law, pharma would owe $19 billion.” The FDA under Marty Makary is officially forcing drug companies to post all clinical trial results, not just the ones that make drugs look effective. “In 2007, Congress passed a law if you run a drug study in America, you have to post the results, all of them, not just the ones that worked.” “If a company runs 10 studies and only 2 work… and they only show the good ones and suppress the bad ones, then the doctor and the patient are misled.” “The fine for breaking this law is about $13,000 a day per trial omitted.” “How many fines has the FDA collected in 19 years? Zero.” “3 weeks ago, Dr. Marty Makary put out an announcement that Pharma has been suppressing unfavorable clinical trial results.” “He sent messages to 2,200 companies saying, ‘We know you’re out of compliance and you have to fix it.’” Dr. Eric Berg DC

“If the FDA had enforced the law, pharma would owe $19 billion.” The FDA under Marty Makary is officially forcing drug companies to post all clinical trial results, not just the ones that make drugs look effective. “In 2007, Congress passed a law if you run a drug study in America, you have to post the results, all of them, not just the ones that worked.” “If a company runs 10 studies and only 2 work… and they only show the good ones and suppress the bad ones, then the doctor and the patient are misled.” “The fine for breaking this law is about $13,000 a day per trial omitted.” “How many fines has the FDA collected in 19 years? Zero.” “3 weeks ago, Dr. Marty Makary put out an announcement that Pharma has been suppressing unfavorable clinical trial results.” “He sent messages to 2,200 companies saying, ‘We know you’re out of compliance and you have to fix it.’” Dr. Eric Berg DC

MAHA Action

15,876 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

.Laura Delano was diagnosed with bipolar disorder at 14 and spent the next 13 years on psychiatric medications including lithium, Lamictal, Abilify, Effexor, and Ativan. After being labeled “treatment resistant” and nearly ending her life, she started questioning whether the medications themselves were part of the problem. In this conversation, Laura walks through what happened when she came off five psychiatric drugs, the years-long withdrawal process that followed, and how she rebuilt her health afterward. She also explains why she founded Intercompass Initiative, a nonprofit helping people taper off psychiatric medications safely. We discuss: • Psychiatric drug dependence and withdrawal • Withdrawal vs. relapse • Hyperbolic tapering • The chemical imbalance theory • Akathisia and neurological symptoms • Diet and recovery • Birth control and psychiatric medication • RFK Jr. and psychiatric drug policy • TikTok censorship • Why 1 in 4 Americans are now on psych meds

.Laura Delano was diagnosed with bipolar disorder at 14 and spent the next 13 years on psychiatric medications including lithium, Lamictal, Abilify, Effexor, and Ativan. After being labeled “treatment resistant” and nearly ending her life, she started questioning whether the medications themselves were part of the problem. In this conversation, Laura walks through what happened when she came off five psychiatric drugs, the years-long withdrawal process that followed, and how she rebuilt her health afterward. She also explains why she founded Intercompass Initiative, a nonprofit helping people taper off psychiatric medications safely. We discuss: • Psychiatric drug dependence and withdrawal • Withdrawal vs. relapse • Hyperbolic tapering • The chemical imbalance theory • Akathisia and neurological symptoms • Diet and recovery • Birth control and psychiatric medication • RFK Jr. and psychiatric drug policy • TikTok censorship • Why 1 in 4 Americans are now on psych meds

Mikhaila Peterson

74,143 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

MMR Vaccine trial will blow your mind. You might wonder, how did this horrible vaccine ever get FDA approval? Well, the FDA approves vaccines (biologics) by efficacy, not safety. See for yourself. 👇 published 2019. The MMR vaccine is at the heart of the vaccine debate. The following are some of the key facts learned from the clinical trial reports produced by the FDA, which the agency relied upon to license the MMR: • There were eight clinical trials that in total had less than 1,000 individuals, out of which only 342 children received the MMR vaccine • The safety review period only tracked 'adverse events' for 42 days after injection • More than half or a significant percent of all participants in each of the eight trials developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections • All adverse events were generically described as 'other viruses' and not considered in safety profile of licensure • The control group received other vaccines for either rubella or measles and rubella, and none of the controls received a placebo (an inert substance such as a saline injection)"

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

26,273 просмотров • 1 год назад

WOAH 🚨 Spencer Pratt says he has evidence the NGOs in Los Angeles are not only providing the needles for the homeless, but they’re also GIVING THEM THE DRUGS TOO “They're giving them the drugs too. So not only are we paying for the needles, the people that give them the needles are also giving them drugs — It's breaking news” “They're giving people drugs. They're giving them needles — They're also giving them the drugs” Think about that, this means our tax dollars are being used to buy drugs for drug addicts to harass is on the streets… it’s insanity But that’s not all California fire management of forests and brush are supposed to be done every 5 years California Democrats are doing it every 17 years, and the job is not done well Multiple NGO money laundering projects exposed that Karen Bass signed off on, “All taxpayer dollars, all approved by Karen Bass” Spencer Pratt wants to reinforce “I am not a politician” and explains why he’s running “I went in here just to be somebody that had a platform and a voice and to yell from the highest mountain I could get, this is unacceptable. We are done with this in Los Angeles. They're lying to us. They're stealing our money. They're giving people drugs. They're giving them needles — They're also giving them the drugs” Los Angeles has to vote for Spencer Pratt We cannot let our money keep being laundered. We can’t let it keep being spent on drugs. We need change The NGOs using our tax money on drugs need to be thrown in prison and so do the politicians

WOAH 🚨 Spencer Pratt says he has evidence the NGOs in Los Angeles are not only providing the needles for the homeless, but they’re also GIVING THEM THE DRUGS TOO “They're giving them the drugs too. So not only are we paying for the needles, the people that give them the needles are also giving them drugs — It's breaking news” “They're giving people drugs. They're giving them needles — They're also giving them the drugs” Think about that, this means our tax dollars are being used to buy drugs for drug addicts to harass is on the streets… it’s insanity But that’s not all California fire management of forests and brush are supposed to be done every 5 years California Democrats are doing it every 17 years, and the job is not done well Multiple NGO money laundering projects exposed that Karen Bass signed off on, “All taxpayer dollars, all approved by Karen Bass” Spencer Pratt wants to reinforce “I am not a politician” and explains why he’s running “I went in here just to be somebody that had a platform and a voice and to yell from the highest mountain I could get, this is unacceptable. We are done with this in Los Angeles. They're lying to us. They're stealing our money. They're giving people drugs. They're giving them needles — They're also giving them the drugs” Los Angeles has to vote for Spencer Pratt We cannot let our money keep being laundered. We can’t let it keep being spent on drugs. We need change The NGOs using our tax money on drugs need to be thrown in prison and so do the politicians

Wall Street Apes

55,341 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Based on “Cornell Jane Doe’s” original statement (given well after the events of that night)… -There are at least FIVE separate times where she gives clear consent for a sex/drug act -There are at least FIVE separate times when she asks for a guy to stop, or a guy proactively stops, what is happening, and each time those wishes are obeyed by the men One of the MANY problems (especially with the interpretation of the post-event messages) with how this story is being manipulated is that people, particularly in the news media, are conflating the sex and the drug use. Though, since she voluntarily did drugs off the penis of one of the guys, I guess that was inevitable. 🤦‍♂️

Sensitive content

Based on “Cornell Jane Doe’s” original statement (given well after the events of that night)… -There are at least FIVE separate times where she gives clear consent for a sex/drug act -There are at least FIVE separate times when she asks for a guy to stop, or a guy proactively stops, what is happening, and each time those wishes are obeyed by the men One of the MANY problems (especially with the interpretation of the post-event messages) with how this story is being manipulated is that people, particularly in the news media, are conflating the sex and the drug use. Though, since she voluntarily did drugs off the penis of one of the guys, I guess that was inevitable. 🤦‍♂️

John Ziegler

232,708 просмотров • 9 дней назад

RFK Jr: “Saying I'm anti-vaccine is like saying I'm anti-medicine.” “I understand some medicines harm people. Some of them have risks. Some of them have benefits that outweigh those risks for certain populations, and the same is true with vaccines.” “We don't understand the risk profile because vaccines are the only medical intervention, medical device, or pharmaceutical drug that are exempt from pre-licensing safety studies.” “There are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them had a safety study that lasted for four days.” “It was on 143 kids, a product that's going to be given to 76 million kids.” “The risk profile prior to the introduction of the vaccine for a baby dying from hepatitis B was one in seven million.” “That means you need to give seven million hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death.”

MAHA Action

117,266 просмотров • 1 год назад

The hepatitis B vaccine given to your child on their first day of life was approved based on a trial of 147 children, followed for five days after each dose, with no placebo group. I have not found another drug tested that poorly, on that small a group, for that short a period, anywhere in my investigation. Here's how you find that out for yourself. Search "FDA licensed vaccines," and every vaccine your doctor recommends will come up. Pull up the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule and look at what you're actually being asked to give, sometimes five vaccines on a single day. Click on one and find the package insert, the same kind of warning label wrapped around every drug you've ever taken, the one almost no doctor has actually read when it comes to vaccines. Go to section 6.1. That's the section the FDA used to decide the product was safe enough for the public. It's one paragraph. Read it for Recombivax HB and you'll see the numbers for yourself. I'm not inventing the idea that vaccines carry risk. It's documented. This is just the beginning of the journey. The FDA is handing you their best evidence for safety. This is what it looks like. And it is not good enough.

The hepatitis B vaccine given to your child on their first day of life was approved based on a trial of 147 children, followed for five days after each dose, with no placebo group. I have not found another drug tested that poorly, on that small a group, for that short a period, anywhere in my investigation. Here's how you find that out for yourself. Search "FDA licensed vaccines," and every vaccine your doctor recommends will come up. Pull up the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule and look at what you're actually being asked to give, sometimes five vaccines on a single day. Click on one and find the package insert, the same kind of warning label wrapped around every drug you've ever taken, the one almost no doctor has actually read when it comes to vaccines. Go to section 6.1. That's the section the FDA used to decide the product was safe enough for the public. It's one paragraph. Read it for Recombivax HB and you'll see the numbers for yourself. I'm not inventing the idea that vaccines carry risk. It's documented. This is just the beginning of the journey. The FDA is handing you their best evidence for safety. This is what it looks like. And it is not good enough.

Del Bigtree

57,378 просмотров • 23 дней назад

"What I was not told and what my parents were not told is that these [psychiatric] drugs are approved by the FDA on the basis of very short term trials - six to eight weeks on average. There is zero evidence base for polypharmacy. So, these drugs…their safety and efficacy has never been studied in combination with each other. And every single psychiatric drug across all the different drug classes is dependence-forming, meaning, as I said earlier, if you take this drug for any length of time, your body may well completely alter itself to accommodate the presence of the drug, so that if you want to come off of it one day, you might have a really hard time doing that. And you might need years of tapering. And I think, especially for girls and women who are teenagers or entering into their young adult childbearing years, it should be a legal requirement that doctors tell us before we start these drugs that if you want to have a child one day, you need to build in a long-term exit strategy here so that you don't find yourself in a situation where you need to stop this drug abruptly and potentially cause significant harm to yourself." - Laura Delano

"What I was not told and what my parents were not told is that these [psychiatric] drugs are approved by the FDA on the basis of very short term trials - six to eight weeks on average. There is zero evidence base for polypharmacy. So, these drugs…their safety and efficacy has never been studied in combination with each other. And every single psychiatric drug across all the different drug classes is dependence-forming, meaning, as I said earlier, if you take this drug for any length of time, your body may well completely alter itself to accommodate the presence of the drug, so that if you want to come off of it one day, you might have a really hard time doing that. And you might need years of tapering. And I think, especially for girls and women who are teenagers or entering into their young adult childbearing years, it should be a legal requirement that doctors tell us before we start these drugs that if you want to have a child one day, you need to build in a long-term exit strategy here so that you don't find yourself in a situation where you need to stop this drug abruptly and potentially cause significant harm to yourself." - Laura Delano

Jan Jekielek

20,592 просмотров • 1 год назад

“My brain felt like it was on fire. I was crawling out of my skin… rocking in the fetal position on the floor, screaming in excruciating pain.” That’s how Danielle Gansky described the severe withdrawal she endured after attempting to stop the SSRI antidepressant she had been prescribed since age 7. It all started when her second-grade teacher noticed she was fidgety and distracted. She was diagnosed with ADHD and put on stimulants (Adderall and Ritalin). This quickly escalated into a cascade of other psychiatric drugs — antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics — all before she turned 10. SSRIs became the one drug she stayed on for her entire life. At 23, she tried to come off the SSRI. Her doctor tapered her in just 6 weeks. The result was years of devastating neurological torment: bedridden, housebound, constant terror, rage, and physical agony she had never experienced before. She calls the overall effect a “chemical lobotomy” that stole her joy, creativity, and sense of self. She just turned 30 and is still trapped on the same SSRI. Even tiny reductions (less than 1%) cause debilitating symptoms. She has now been in protracted withdrawal for seven years. What’s your experience — have you or someone you know struggled with long-term psychiatric medication or severe withdrawal?

“My brain felt like it was on fire. I was crawling out of my skin… rocking in the fetal position on the floor, screaming in excruciating pain.” That’s how Danielle Gansky described the severe withdrawal she endured after attempting to stop the SSRI antidepressant she had been prescribed since age 7. It all started when her second-grade teacher noticed she was fidgety and distracted. She was diagnosed with ADHD and put on stimulants (Adderall and Ritalin). This quickly escalated into a cascade of other psychiatric drugs — antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics — all before she turned 10. SSRIs became the one drug she stayed on for her entire life. At 23, she tried to come off the SSRI. Her doctor tapered her in just 6 weeks. The result was years of devastating neurological torment: bedridden, housebound, constant terror, rage, and physical agony she had never experienced before. She calls the overall effect a “chemical lobotomy” that stole her joy, creativity, and sense of self. She just turned 30 and is still trapped on the same SSRI. Even tiny reductions (less than 1%) cause debilitating symptoms. She has now been in protracted withdrawal for seven years. What’s your experience — have you or someone you know struggled with long-term psychiatric medication or severe withdrawal?

Camus

74,646 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong just exposed a maddening FDA reality on his own approved cancer drug (Anktiva): It’s fully approved in the US for one rare form of bladder cancer… but not for the common form most patients have. So even though the same drug is already FDA-approved and sitting in their files, he can’t use it off-label for other patients without insane one-patient-at-a-time paperwork, IRB delays, and individual FDA sign-off. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia (with their own sophisticated FDA) reviewed the exact same 1.7 million pages of data and approved it for more cancers. His blunt takeaway: Cancer is a war against time. Patients are forced to fly to Saudi Arabia for access… or wait in bureaucratic limbo while the clock runs out. “I’m completely befuddled as to why this molecule… that stimulates your NK cells is not allowed to give to people who have low NK cells.” If a drug is already FDA-approved and sitting in their own files, why the insane barriers to using it for other patients who are dying? Is this protecting people… or protecting something else?

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong just exposed a maddening FDA reality on his own approved cancer drug (Anktiva): It’s fully approved in the US for one rare form of bladder cancer… but not for the common form most patients have. So even though the same drug is already FDA-approved and sitting in their files, he can’t use it off-label for other patients without insane one-patient-at-a-time paperwork, IRB delays, and individual FDA sign-off. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia (with their own sophisticated FDA) reviewed the exact same 1.7 million pages of data and approved it for more cancers. His blunt takeaway: Cancer is a war against time. Patients are forced to fly to Saudi Arabia for access… or wait in bureaucratic limbo while the clock runs out. “I’m completely befuddled as to why this molecule… that stimulates your NK cells is not allowed to give to people who have low NK cells.” If a drug is already FDA-approved and sitting in their own files, why the insane barriers to using it for other patients who are dying? Is this protecting people… or protecting something else?

Camus

51,195 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Three things about antidepressants that almost nobody knows, and each one should bother you more than the last. First: when your doctor says Prozac, Lexapro, or Zoloft is "safe and effective," the honest version of that sentence is "safe and effective for the year it was studied." The FDA's own chief medical and scientific officer, Vinay Prasad, looked at the ten most prescribed antidepressants in America. Not one has a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial longer than a year. Seventeen percent of the population takes these drugs, many for decades, and beyond year one, nobody actually knows whether the benefits outweigh the risks. The public believes these are among the most-studied drugs in history. Long term, they barely qualify as studied at all. Second: the FDA requires no studies on how to get people off these medications after long-term use. None. Millions of people have been on them for years, and the science of safely discontinuing them is a black hole that no drug company has ever been required to fill. Third, and this is the one I want you to sit with: they aren't even required to make doses you can taper from. Coming off safely means small reductions, far smaller than the tablets that exist. So when people ask me why antidepressant use keeps climbing every year, "the world is more stressful" is only part of the answer. Some of it is simpler and worse: people get on, discover there's no off-ramp built, and stay stuck. We built a system with an entrance and no exit. That's not a mental health epidemic. That's a design flaw.

Three things about antidepressants that almost nobody knows, and each one should bother you more than the last. First: when your doctor says Prozac, Lexapro, or Zoloft is "safe and effective," the honest version of that sentence is "safe and effective for the year it was studied." The FDA's own chief medical and scientific officer, Vinay Prasad, looked at the ten most prescribed antidepressants in America. Not one has a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial longer than a year. Seventeen percent of the population takes these drugs, many for decades, and beyond year one, nobody actually knows whether the benefits outweigh the risks. The public believes these are among the most-studied drugs in history. Long term, they barely qualify as studied at all. Second: the FDA requires no studies on how to get people off these medications after long-term use. None. Millions of people have been on them for years, and the science of safely discontinuing them is a black hole that no drug company has ever been required to fill. Third, and this is the one I want you to sit with: they aren't even required to make doses you can taper from. Coming off safely means small reductions, far smaller than the tablets that exist. So when people ask me why antidepressant use keeps climbing every year, "the world is more stressful" is only part of the answer. Some of it is simpler and worse: people get on, discover there's no off-ramp built, and stay stuck. We built a system with an entrance and no exit. That's not a mental health epidemic. That's a design flaw.

Dr. Josef

17,473 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Doctor exposes a sobering reality about chemotherapy drug use and cancer. “They [kill] a lot of people sooner than they would have if they had just actually left them alone.” Dr. Gene Posca explains that the FDA has had a troubling history of approving experimental drugs while sidelining safety. Yes, many of these drugs shrank tumors — but there was a devastating cost. “[Patients] died more often and earlier,” Dr. Posca lamented. It’s a grave reminder that efficacy is not the most important aspect of a drug — safety is. And this reality is one that the medical industry has ignored for far too long. #ad: This clip comes from an eye-opening new film by The Truth About Vaccines. If you’ve wondered why Americans are sicker than ever — and why no one stopped it — this film lays it all out. I’ve already watched it, and it tells the corruption story masterfully. You can watch it now for free here:

Doctor exposes a sobering reality about chemotherapy drug use and cancer. “They [kill] a lot of people sooner than they would have if they had just actually left them alone.” Dr. Gene Posca explains that the FDA has had a troubling history of approving experimental drugs while sidelining safety. Yes, many of these drugs shrank tumors — but there was a devastating cost. “[Patients] died more often and earlier,” Dr. Posca lamented. It’s a grave reminder that efficacy is not the most important aspect of a drug — safety is. And this reality is one that the medical industry has ignored for far too long. #ad: This clip comes from an eye-opening new film by The Truth About Vaccines. If you’ve wondered why Americans are sicker than ever — and why no one stopped it — this film lays it all out. I’ve already watched it, and it tells the corruption story masterfully. You can watch it now for free here:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

75,409 просмотров • 1 год назад

Former FDA Medical Officer Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring, one of the gatekeepers of the world’s medicine, reveals the first time he realized that prescriptions were hurting people more than helping them. “One thing that I thought was mind-blowing was that we did not study the drugs any longer than about a year, and for me, that was the moment.” He reflects on the guilt he felt after seeing patients harmed while pushing certain prescriptions after saying they were “safe and effective, approved by the FDA,” without providing nuance as to what that actually means and how it only pertained to roughly one year of clinical research. Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring lifts the veil on the reality of the FDA approval process and explains how and why holistic healing can be far more effective for many people in E317 of The Lila Rose Show. Watch.

Former FDA Medical Officer Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring, one of the gatekeepers of the world’s medicine, reveals the first time he realized that prescriptions were hurting people more than helping them. “One thing that I thought was mind-blowing was that we did not study the drugs any longer than about a year, and for me, that was the moment.” He reflects on the guilt he felt after seeing patients harmed while pushing certain prescriptions after saying they were “safe and effective, approved by the FDA,” without providing nuance as to what that actually means and how it only pertained to roughly one year of clinical research. Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring lifts the veil on the reality of the FDA approval process and explains how and why holistic healing can be far more effective for many people in E317 of The Lila Rose Show. Watch.

Lila Rose

17,307 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад