Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Who understood the brief better? 👇

maxescu's profile picture

Alex Patrascu

36,839 subscribers

199,411 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

KunstWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Kimi K3 vs Claude 4.8 Opus colosseum! 2.50$ vs 7.60$ Which one did better?
0:12

Kimi K3 vs Claude 4.8 Opus colosseum! 2.50$ vs 7.60$ Which one did better?

Chris

54,777 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 $16.45 vs $37.94
0:12

Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 $16.45 vs $37.94

shirish

1,291,580 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

CHINA LO VOLVIÓ A HACER Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 → Fable 5: 52.400 tokens, $0.68 → Kimi K3: 36.200 tokens, $0.07
0:12

CHINA LO VOLVIÓ A HACER Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 → Fable 5: 52.400 tokens, $0.68 → Kimi K3: 36.200 tokens, $0.07

Nico

136,199 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Gemini 3.6 Flash is now on DeepSWE at 49%, roughly on par with Opus 4.8 at medium reasoning.
0:14

Gemini 3.6 Flash is now on DeepSWE at 49%, roughly on par with Opus 4.8 at medium reasoning.

Datacurve

244,918 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

465,459 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.
0:12

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.

Design Arena

22,032 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Gemini 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 3.0 Pro Same prompt. Flash is much faster and quality is surprisingly close. Which one do you prefer?
0:17

Gemini 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 3.0 Pro Same prompt. Flash is much faster and quality is surprisingly close. Which one do you prefer?

Mattia

226,692 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Same prompt. Flash is faster and cheaper. Design style is quite different. Which one do you prefer?
0:14

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Same prompt. Flash is faster and cheaper. Design style is quite different. Which one do you prefer?

Mattia

153,123 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Kimi K3 made the best black hole simulation i have seen ever
0:19

Kimi K3 made the best black hole simulation i have seen ever

Chetaslua

92,165 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Kimi K3 running inside the Codex app. Here is the 5-minute setup.
0:11

Kimi K3 running inside the Codex app. Here is the 5-minute setup.

Kai

153,071 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.
0:13

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

Bhavy☄️

28,707 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Kimi K3 combines strong 3D reasoning, coding, and vision capabilities to turn concepts, images, and videos into fully playable interactive experiences. Kimi K3 achieves true "vision in the loop" by seamlessly iterating between code and live screenshots
0:18

Kimi K3 combines strong 3D reasoning, coding, and vision capabilities to turn concepts, images, and videos into fully playable interactive experiences. Kimi K3 achieves true "vision in the loop" by seamlessly iterating between code and live screenshots

Kimi.ai

333,321 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?
0:15

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

Lumina

71,846 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Kimi K3 just jumped 17 places to #1 on Arena.ai's Frontend Code Arena. So we gave it real client work to see where leaderboards meet reality: >10 landing page briefs, >judged blind by 8 working designers >against GPT 5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Claude Fable 5. It tied the best model in the study. And on detailed briefs, it won. Details in 🧵:
0:15

Kimi K3 just jumped 17 places to #1 on Arena.ai's Frontend Code Arena. So we gave it real client work to see where leaderboards meet reality: >10 landing page briefs, >judged blind by 8 working designers >against GPT 5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Claude Fable 5. It tied the best model in the study. And on detailed briefs, it won. Details in 🧵:

ben

13,270 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Opus 5 is actually good GPT-5.6 is actually good Fable 5 is actually good Kimi K3 is actually good Qwen 3.8 is actually good Grok 4.5 is actually good Meanwhile, Gemini is still trying...
0:10

Opus 5 is actually good GPT-5.6 is actually good Fable 5 is actually good Kimi K3 is actually good Qwen 3.8 is actually good Grok 4.5 is actually good Meanwhile, Gemini is still trying...

Sakshi Sugandhi

51,862 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

we compared Gemini 3.1 Pro, Opus 4.7, and GPT 5.5 to Kimi K2.6, Xiaomi Mimo v2.5, and Qwen 3.6 Max in average, closed source are faster. GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7 the fastest. Kimi K2.6 comes after. It keeps up thanks to its native INT4 quantization. MiMo took the longest, but the refinement and aesthetic only ranks after Gemini 3.1. as if a mini Gemini. Its slow cuz it's trained for long-horizon agentic work. Claude Opus 4.7 is blooming in a very different style, probably because Anthropic trains for taste, not just accuracy.
0:16

we compared Gemini 3.1 Pro, Opus 4.7, and GPT 5.5 to Kimi K2.6, Xiaomi Mimo v2.5, and Qwen 3.6 Max in average, closed source are faster. GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7 the fastest. Kimi K2.6 comes after. It keeps up thanks to its native INT4 quantization. MiMo took the longest, but the refinement and aesthetic only ranks after Gemini 3.1. as if a mini Gemini. Its slow cuz it's trained for long-horizon agentic work. Claude Opus 4.7 is blooming in a very different style, probably because Anthropic trains for taste, not just accuracy.

GMI Cloud

37,446 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.
0:17

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

i gave the same prompt to kimi k2.5 and this is what it built who did it better?
0:17

i gave the same prompt to kimi k2.5 and this is what it built who did it better?

Okara

17,549 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Gemini vs Claude It’s getting too easy now. Prompt below 👇
0:14

Gemini vs Claude It’s getting too easy now. Prompt below 👇

Viktor Oddy

86,744 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4
0:13

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4

GMI Cloud

24,233 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen