Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol. Both outputs rendered with Seedance 2.0.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

211,861 subscribers

397,894 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

KunstWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

More action scenes from the Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol eval set. Both generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:13

More action scenes from the Kimi K3 vs. GPT 5.6 Sol eval set. Both generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

63,341 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.
0:14

Model eval round: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5. Rendered with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

33,370 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:11

Model comparison: GPT 5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 in a game POV edition generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

41,820 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

146,888 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Kimi K3, which one do you think is better? Share your opinion in the comments!
0:13

GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Kimi K3, which one do you think is better? Share your opinion in the comments!

Sam

61,912 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.
0:16

Another comparison round. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Fable 5 directing the same dinosaur animation with Seedance 2.0 on Vidfield.

Abhishek

92,135 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Action scene comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.
0:12

Action scene comparison of GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable 5, generated with Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

24,258 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4
0:13

Kimi K3 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on both speed and in cost in backend bug fixing ! Planted 4 defects in the same Python order service: a wrong-total calculation, a broken access-control check (IDOR), a crash on invalid input, and an inventory oversell. Both models got identical code and the same prompt, with an automated test suite verifying every fix over the live API. Both went 4/4, but by the time Kimi K3 finished all 4, GPT 5.6 had only fixed 2. Kimi wrapped in under half the time, at half the cost. Kimi K3: 1min 34s · $0.1 · 4/4 GPT 5.6 Sol: 4min 6s · $0.2 · 4/4

GMI Cloud

24,580 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.
0:12

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.

Design Arena

22,584 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Same concept. Two AI assistants writing the prompt Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol animated by Seedance 2.0, powered by BytePlus Both prompts below so you can test them yourself
0:13

Same concept. Two AI assistants writing the prompt Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol animated by Seedance 2.0, powered by BytePlus Both prompts below so you can test them yourself

Magnific

11,397 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs GPT Images 2.0, both fed into Seedance 2.0.
0:12

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs GPT Images 2.0, both fed into Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

92,480 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads
0:14

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads

Romain Torres

2,107,126 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵
0:12

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both were animated with Seedance 2.0. Check replies to find the prompt 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

37,876 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP
0:13

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Created with Arcads MCP

Romain Torres

187,375 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both animated in Seedance 2.0. Prompt in the thread 🧵
0:11

Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. GPT Image 2.0. Both animated in Seedance 2.0. Prompt in the thread 🧵

Higgsfield AI 🧩

34,486 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓
0:13

gpt 5.6 + seedance 2.0 is a cheat code I gave GPT-5.6 Sol a simple idea, and it created a detailed prompt for this fight scene. The motion came out incredibly smooth, and I’m really happy with the result. Prompt below ↓

Kiki

21,329 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Comparison in cartoon animation created with Arcads
0:12

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Comparison in cartoon animation created with Arcads

arcads AI

30,288 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

470,828 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Redefining 'personalized shopping' with GPT-5.6-sol
0:16

Redefining 'personalized shopping' with GPT-5.6-sol

Sarah Chieng

248,073 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.
0:13

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

Bhavy☄️

34,045 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen