Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Kimi K3 vs. MiniMax M3.1 Flash | WebGPU & 3D Koi Pond Simulation One technical challenge. Two AI models. Different approaches to interactive 3D development. Testing both models on a WebGPU-powered 3D koi pond, featuring realistic water ripples, swimming koi fish, dynamic reflections, and real-time rendering. MiniMax M3.1 Flash...

79,210 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

27 Yorum

Zara Tech & Tools profil fotoğrafı
Zara Tech & Tools16 gün önce

Great technical comparison and creative benchmark

Elix profil fotoğrafı
Elix16 gün önce

Interactive 3D demos are a great way to benchmark coding models

PreneursCircle profil fotoğrafı
PreneursCircle16 gün önce

Curious which model needed fewer iterations to get it working

BuildersSpace profil fotoğrafı
BuildersSpace16 gün önce

Can both models maintain smooth performance with multiple animated fish?

Businessaholic profil fotoğrafı
Businessaholic16 gün önce

Real-time rendering adds a whole new layer of complexity

matteo profil fotoğrafı
matteo16 gün önce

curious. just use the prompt and not provided any 3d assets?

Jessica profil fotoğrafı
Jessica16 gün önce

Those water reflections are where things get interesting 👀

Alex Ai | Tools & Updates profil fotoğrafı
Alex Ai | Tools & Updates16 gün önce

WebGPU 3D koi pond with realistic ripples looks absolutely mesmerizing

Arfa Farheen profil fotoğrafı
Arfa Farheen16 gün önce

Soft-body physics is a much more interesting test than a static 3D model

EntrepBuilder profil fotoğrafı
EntrepBuilder16 gün önce

WebGPU is a great test of how far AI coding has come.

Nova Tech profil fotoğrafı
Nova Tech16 gün önce

Great benchmark comparison interactive 3D rendering impressive technical demonstration work

Mira Synth Tech profil fotoğrafı
Mira Synth Tech16 gün önce

Great benchmark M3.1 Flash looks impressively fast for 3D work

Aaliya profil fotoğrafı
Aaliya16 gün önce

The water ripples and fish movements make this a great test.

Business Corner | Showcasing Entrepreneur profil fotoğrafı
Business Corner | Showcasing Entrepreneur16 gün önce

MiniMax looks promising for rapid prototyping 🔥

Charly Adams profil fotoğrafı
Charly Adams16 gün önce

Sounds like a fun experiment! It's always interesting to see how different AI models handle creative tasks like that.

Edward Frank Morris 🦇 profil fotoğrafı
Edward Frank Morris 🦇16 gün önce

This is a much more meaningful test than a simple coding prompt

Veyra | AI & Tech profil fotoğrafı
Veyra | AI & Tech16 gün önce

The koi pond test is such a creative benchmark choice

Alice The Ai Expert profil fotoğrafı
Alice The Ai Expert16 gün önce

Turning complex WebGPU ideas into a live interactive koi pond incredible demo of creative coding speed!

Darce profil fotoğrafı
Darce16 gün önce

A koi pond is a sneaky good test, water ripples and fish motion expose sloppy shader code fast. Did either model get the WebGPU setup right first try?

Evia AI profil fotoğrafı
Evia AI16 gün önce

Great benchmark showing AI models powering richer interactive experiences

EDDY VU profil fotoğrafı
EDDY VU16 gün önce

Super interesting approach, how are you handling edge cases when scaling concurrent workloads?

Alex So profil fotoğrafı
Alex So16 gün önce

Could you share the prompt and a runnable link for each version? I'd compare frame time on the same device and how many manual fixes each needed.

Business Mindful profil fotoğrafı
Business Mindful16 gün önce

The difference in execution speed would be interesting to compare

RAZA | AI EXPLORER profil fotoğrafı
RAZA | AI EXPLORER16 gün önce

Great benchmark. Real-world interactive builds reveal far more about a model’s coding abilities than scores alone.

ApexAIHighlight profil fotoğrafı
ApexAIHighlight16 gün önce

A beautiful demo is one thing. Clean, maintainable code is another

Sufyan Maan, M.Eng profil fotoğrafı
Sufyan Maan, M.Eng16 gün önce

Would love to see how both models handle WebGPU fallbacks

Oliver profil fotoğrafı
Oliver16 gün önce

Speed matters, but working output matters more

Benzer Videolar

I built FlashDesk with MiniMax (official) M3.1 Flash 🐰⚡ But can an AI agent do more than just generate text? I wanted to explore that question by building a practical AI customer-support workflow. Meet FlashDesk 👇 💡 An AI-powered customer support agent designed to help teams handle repetitive tickets more efficiently. Here's what it can do: → Analyze incoming customer queries → Categorize issues and assess urgency → Generate context-aware response drafts → Recommend next steps → Flag sensitive cases for human review Why MiniMax M3.1 Flash? Building useful AI agents requires more than a good response. It requires models that can support complex workflows while keeping speed and cost in mind. ⚡ Agentic capabilities: Designed for multi-step workflows and tool calling. 💻 Coding capabilities: Helps developers build and iterate on practical AI applications. 🚀 Speed: MiniMax reports nearly 3× faster online inference compared with its previous generation. 💰 Cost efficiency: MiniMax reports 70% lower overall usage cost for agentic tasks compared with its predecessor. In FlashDesk, these capabilities come together in a workflow that turns a customer ticket into a structured analysis, a suggested response, and clear next steps. And when it comes to sensitive billing disputes, AI assists while humans stay in control. That's what excites me about building with MiniMax M3.1 Flash: turning model capabilities into practical applications. 🎥 Watch the demo and see FlashDesk in action. Try out now: What would you build with MiniMax M3.1 Flash? #MiniMax #M31Flash #AIAgents #BuildWithAI

Dipanshu Kushwaha

25,227 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce