Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

1,698,307 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Jason's profile picture
Jason1 year ago

How is taxing the rich MASSIVELY PUNISHING them??

Trump2024Film's profile picture
Trump2024Film1 year ago

How will you answer?

terry christian's profile picture
terry christian1 year ago

Piers Morgan is an arsehole

Chris Swan's profile picture
Chris Swan1 year ago

You also had far less immigration.

JJ's profile picture
JJ1 year ago

This is the most idiotic take I’ve heard all week! You’re obviously not a student of logical fallacies huh 🤣 A is true. B is also true. Therefore À caused B. Fucking retard. Know your LOGIC moron

Britain for Trump's profile picture
Britain for Trump1 year ago

There was no mass immigration back then.

Colin Monaghan's profile picture
Colin Monaghan1 year ago

Likewise…both parents born in 1930s and raised in council house tenements…my dad worked as an engineer and was able to buy his own house and raise four kids on his salary alone…1950-1970 was the fastest period of consistent economic growth in UK in the 20th century - 3% a year - while the top rate tax was 91-98%…of course there was a real Labour Party during this period that represented working people…that died with Tony Blair in 1997 and is long gone.

Kellie-Jay Keen's profile picture
Kellie-Jay Keen1 year ago

Gary from accounts. Property prices are impacted by not enough housing, foreign and corporate property blocking and other market forces. The rising house prices versus wages that can’t keep up is why people cannot afford them.

Eric Chartman's profile picture
Eric Chartman1 year ago

Sure, taxing the rich more works...

Douglas Karr's profile picture
Douglas Karr1 year ago

1. Tax burden was ~36.1% of GDP in 1950, it going to hit 38.3% of GDP by 2027-28. 2. Since then, you’ve added Capital Gains Tax (1965), Corporation Tax (1965), Value Added Tax (VAT) (1973), Petroleum Revenue Tax (1975), Inheritance Tax (1986). Hidden taxes on everything. 3. 47% of public sector workers had employer pension contributions of at least 20%, compared to only 2% in the private sector. 4. Federal employment has skyrocketed to 6.12 million, representing about 18% of the UK’s total workforce compared to less than 4% in the 1950s.

Hunter Hellman's profile picture
Hunter Hellman1 year ago

Could buy a house in his 20’s, but couldn’t keep the lights on, because the entire country couldn’t.

Related Videos