Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Labour has NOT dropped its Islamophobia definition. Ministers are refusing to publish their advice so that it can be scrutinised. This process cannot continue in secret. They must let the public see the draft definition before they decide whether to adopt it.

Claire Coutinho

32,846 subscribers

206,586 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The last time Labour adopted an Islamophobia definition, Labour-led councils didn’t speak up about grooming gangs because of fears of being called racist. Now, they are about to adopt a new definition and impose it on our public bodies without anyone seeing what is in it. No religion or religious group should be above legitimate criticism in a free society. Labour must end this work behind closed doors and publish the draft definition for full public scrutiny.

The last time Labour adopted an Islamophobia definition, Labour-led councils didn’t speak up about grooming gangs because of fears of being called racist. Now, they are about to adopt a new definition and impose it on our public bodies without anyone seeing what is in it. No religion or religious group should be above legitimate criticism in a free society. Labour must end this work behind closed doors and publish the draft definition for full public scrutiny.

Claire Coutinho

299,351 views • 8 months ago

🚨 NEW: I’ve been told that Labour are inviting left wing activists to come and see their secret Islamophobia definition. But they’re not publishing it to give the public the same opportunity. The definition risks becoming a back-door blasphemy law. The secrecy has to stop.

🚨 NEW: I’ve been told that Labour are inviting left wing activists to come and see their secret Islamophobia definition. But they’re not publishing it to give the public the same opportunity. The definition risks becoming a back-door blasphemy law. The secrecy has to stop.

Claire Coutinho

297,692 views • 8 months ago

A year ago Keir Starmer was asked to introduce a blasphemy law. He didn't say no. Today he said he wouldn't introduce a blasphemy law through an Islamophobia definition. But we know his Government has been working on one for MONTHS and they are refusing to let the public see it - despite inviting left-wing activist groups to provide feedback. They must publish the definition BEFORE a decision is made so that we can all scrutinise the definition and the impact it will have on freedom of speech.

A year ago Keir Starmer was asked to introduce a blasphemy law. He didn't say no. Today he said he wouldn't introduce a blasphemy law through an Islamophobia definition. But we know his Government has been working on one for MONTHS and they are refusing to let the public see it - despite inviting left-wing activist groups to provide feedback. They must publish the definition BEFORE a decision is made so that we can all scrutinise the definition and the impact it will have on freedom of speech.

Claire Coutinho

164,428 views • 7 months ago

Unbelievable The Labour Party keep saying they are going to root out Islamophobia. Today I asked the Secretary of State for their official definition of Islamophobia. You couldn't make this up 👇

Unbelievable The Labour Party keep saying they are going to root out Islamophobia. Today I asked the Secretary of State for their official definition of Islamophobia. You couldn't make this up 👇

Lee Anderson MP

3,217,101 views • 1 year ago

You must understand, these are not ordinary circumstances. Trump and his team not only have to do everything by the book, but they also have to win the court of public opinion. If we are going to arrest the traitors, the public must understand why BEFORE it happens. The public must be shown, repeatedly, until the reality registers and stays in their brains. Not once or twice, over and over again, to the point that they never forget it and have no doubt. It must be so convincing and incontrovertible, that it awakens them from their deep slumber. Decades of brainwashing cannot be undone overnight. It must be methodical and controlled. On the bright side, this unbrainwashing operation has been underway for years, and we are closer to the endgame than you think.

You must understand, these are not ordinary circumstances. Trump and his team not only have to do everything by the book, but they also have to win the court of public opinion. If we are going to arrest the traitors, the public must understand why BEFORE it happens. The public must be shown, repeatedly, until the reality registers and stays in their brains. Not once or twice, over and over again, to the point that they never forget it and have no doubt. It must be so convincing and incontrovertible, that it awakens them from their deep slumber. Decades of brainwashing cannot be undone overnight. It must be methodical and controlled. On the bright side, this unbrainwashing operation has been underway for years, and we are closer to the endgame than you think.

Whiplash347

17,430 views • 5 months ago

In less than a week, Labour’s “anti-Muslim hostility” definition has shown its true colours. Labour MPs have already tried to weaponise this non-statutory definition of Islamophobia to silence the Shadow Justice Secretary for calling out political Islam. Rather than allowing the definition to face scrutiny in Parliament, Labour set up a five-member working group to draft it — all of whom had ties to Islamist organisations. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw on Talk👇

In less than a week, Labour’s “anti-Muslim hostility” definition has shown its true colours. Labour MPs have already tried to weaponise this non-statutory definition of Islamophobia to silence the Shadow Justice Secretary for calling out political Islam. Rather than allowing the definition to face scrutiny in Parliament, Labour set up a five-member working group to draft it — all of whom had ties to Islamist organisations. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw on Talk👇

The Free Speech Union

120,774 views • 3 months ago

It is up to Labour MPs to choose what kind of politicians they want to be. They can live up to their promises on standards and allow the Privileges Committee to decide whether Starmer lied to Parliament. Or they can choose to put party before country.

It is up to Labour MPs to choose what kind of politicians they want to be. They can live up to their promises on standards and allow the Privileges Committee to decide whether Starmer lied to Parliament. Or they can choose to put party before country.

Kemi Badenoch

40,220 views • 2 months ago

[Russia really thinks it can decide whether Ukraine can exist or not] Lavrov: Ukraine has the right to exist, provided it must let people go. The people who, during a [illegal and rigged] referendum, decided that they belong to the Russian culture. 1/

[Russia really thinks it can decide whether Ukraine can exist or not] Lavrov: Ukraine has the right to exist, provided it must let people go. The people who, during a [illegal and rigged] referendum, decided that they belong to the Russian culture. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

298,596 views • 10 months ago

David Lammy says judges can adopt the Government’s “Islamophobia” definition. It’s supposed to be non-statutory. But it’s clearly going to change the way the law works. That’s why we will scrap it.

David Lammy says judges can adopt the Government’s “Islamophobia” definition. It’s supposed to be non-statutory. But it’s clearly going to change the way the law works. That’s why we will scrap it.

Nick Timothy MP

277,278 views • 3 months ago

Islamist extremism is sadly a threat we know all too well in this country, and we should not be afraid to call out this extremist ideology wherever we see it So the government must pledge to drop any definition of Islamophobia that makes calling out Islamist extremism any harder

Islamist extremism is sadly a threat we know all too well in this country, and we should not be afraid to call out this extremist ideology wherever we see it So the government must pledge to drop any definition of Islamophobia that makes calling out Islamist extremism any harder

Chris Philp MP

141,998 views • 9 months ago

The bodies of our #Kuki_Zo brothers and sisters have finally been given to us today after about 8 months. I don't know whether I'm sad & pained today, or whether I'm glad. It's very difficult to comprehend my feelings right now, Whether the tears that are forming are for sadness or are for gladness, knowing what must be going through the family of their loved ones, what they must be thinking, what they must be doing. How angry they must be feeling. How sad they must be feeling. How helpless they must be feeling. I know the pain that helplessness of losing someone when I lost my dad. So, I know very well what must be going through their minds. All I can say for sure is, let their sacrifices and their pain, and your pain not go in vain. It just cannot. See you all on the other side and say hello to my Dad as well. Rest in peace brave ones. 🙏🙏🙏 #Manipur

The bodies of our #Kuki_Zo brothers and sisters have finally been given to us today after about 8 months. I don't know whether I'm sad & pained today, or whether I'm glad. It's very difficult to comprehend my feelings right now, Whether the tears that are forming are for sadness or are for gladness, knowing what must be going through the family of their loved ones, what they must be thinking, what they must be doing. How angry they must be feeling. How sad they must be feeling. How helpless they must be feeling. I know the pain that helplessness of losing someone when I lost my dad. So, I know very well what must be going through their minds. All I can say for sure is, let their sacrifices and their pain, and your pain not go in vain. It just cannot. See you all on the other side and say hello to my Dad as well. Rest in peace brave ones. 🙏🙏🙏 #Manipur

Adv. Siam Phaipi

11,042 views • 2 years ago

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNION CHALLENGES GOVERNMENT “ISLAMOPHOBIA” DEFINITION A major legal battle over free speech is now unfolding in Britain. The Free Speech Union has announced it is launching a judicial review against the government’s adoption of a new official definition of “Islamophobia” (described by ministers as anti-Muslim hostility). Critics argue the policy risks creating a blasphemy law through the back door, something Parliament abolished in England and Wales nearly two decades ago. According to the Free Speech Union, the government’s plan to adopt the definition — and appoint an official “czar” to enforce it — could seriously restrict lawful debate, criticism, and public discussion. They say legal advice suggests the move may be unlawful, and have formally placed the government on notice that they intend to challenge the decision in court. The organisation is now asking supporters to help fund the case, warning that judicial reviews against government policy are extremely expensive but crucial for protecting civil liberties. The core question now being raised is simple: Has the government created a new form of blasphemy protection for one religion, or is this a necessary step to combat discrimination? The courts may soon decide. The Free Speech Union

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNION CHALLENGES GOVERNMENT “ISLAMOPHOBIA” DEFINITION A major legal battle over free speech is now unfolding in Britain. The Free Speech Union has announced it is launching a judicial review against the government’s adoption of a new official definition of “Islamophobia” (described by ministers as anti-Muslim hostility). Critics argue the policy risks creating a blasphemy law through the back door, something Parliament abolished in England and Wales nearly two decades ago. According to the Free Speech Union, the government’s plan to adopt the definition — and appoint an official “czar” to enforce it — could seriously restrict lawful debate, criticism, and public discussion. They say legal advice suggests the move may be unlawful, and have formally placed the government on notice that they intend to challenge the decision in court. The organisation is now asking supporters to help fund the case, warning that judicial reviews against government policy are extremely expensive but crucial for protecting civil liberties. The core question now being raised is simple: Has the government created a new form of blasphemy protection for one religion, or is this a necessary step to combat discrimination? The courts may soon decide. The Free Speech Union

Jim Ferguson

13,568 views • 4 months ago

The fact that we're debating before the Supreme Court whether a president can be a dictator speaks to how dangerous and dark a path Donald Trump has lead America down. In November we must decide if we continue down it.

The fact that we're debating before the Supreme Court whether a president can be a dictator speaks to how dangerous and dark a path Donald Trump has lead America down. In November we must decide if we continue down it.

The Lincoln Project

552,287 views • 2 years ago

Githu Muigai: The public is not participating so that it may make the decision whether to impeach or not. That is not the work of the public. The public is participating so that this political process may be informed.

Githu Muigai: The public is not participating so that it may make the decision whether to impeach or not. That is not the work of the public. The public is participating so that this political process may be informed.

KTN News

94,050 views • 2 months ago

In Middlesbrough, they are asking drivers their skin colour to decide whether they let them through or not. Yes, you have seriously just read that headline in the year 2024.

In Middlesbrough, they are asking drivers their skin colour to decide whether they let them through or not. Yes, you have seriously just read that headline in the year 2024.

george

3,982,630 views • 1 year ago

Keir Starmer chose to appoint Peter Mandelson. Are the public seriously going to be told by the Labour Party that they can continue to trust his judgement?

Keir Starmer chose to appoint Peter Mandelson. Are the public seriously going to be told by the Labour Party that they can continue to trust his judgement?

Stephen Flynn

29,938 views • 5 months ago

"We've been trying to say to Labour ministers, they have to be really careful because knowing there's a genocide and not taking action, they then can be accused of complicity, particularly if you continue to supply arms, which they are". John McDonnell warns that Labour ministers, despite repeated evidence from Gaza doctors, are failing to act on the genocide and could be held complicit, especially while continuing to supply arms.

"We've been trying to say to Labour ministers, they have to be really careful because knowing there's a genocide and not taking action, they then can be accused of complicity, particularly if you continue to supply arms, which they are". John McDonnell warns that Labour ministers, despite repeated evidence from Gaza doctors, are failing to act on the genocide and could be held complicit, especially while continuing to supply arms.

Novara Media

13,724 views • 9 months ago

Its a burdened mind that comes to the realisation that the main reason people decide to end their own lives isn't because they don't love life, or the people in it, but because they want a pain that others can not see or feel, to finally stop.

Its a burdened mind that comes to the realisation that the main reason people decide to end their own lives isn't because they don't love life, or the people in it, but because they want a pain that others can not see or feel, to finally stop.

Vinnie Sullivan

11,525 views • 5 months ago

Labour’s Islamophobia definition has already been misused to shut down free speech. Radical activists now have a doorway to push divisive ideas into our public bodies - exactly as they did for race and gender issues. We must stand against it.

Labour’s Islamophobia definition has already been misused to shut down free speech. Radical activists now have a doorway to push divisive ideas into our public bodies - exactly as they did for race and gender issues. We must stand against it.

Claire Coutinho

13,867 views • 15 days ago