Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 Labour Minister – no solution on the risks from unknown illegal arrivals housed in hotels “What are your thoughts on male migrants coming illegally into the country, being housed in local hotels, and the increase of attacks on women from them?” Her response? “We’ll deport people who commit...

statsjamie's profile picture

Jamie Jenkins

107,226 subscribers

28,443 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

WHY is this 54 year old British woman on the streets when there are currently 22,000 illegal migrant MEN in HOTELS? With approximately a further 70,000 in HMOs. An absolute bloody disgrace! NO British citizen should be sleeping on the streets of their homeland while illegal invaders are being housed in taxpayer funded accommodation!! The Labour Party Natalie Fleet MP Restore Britain
1:00

WHY is this 54 year old British woman on the streets when there are currently 22,000 illegal migrant MEN in HOTELS? With approximately a further 70,000 in HMOs. An absolute bloody disgrace! NO British citizen should be sleeping on the streets of their homeland while illegal invaders are being housed in taxpayer funded accommodation!! The Labour Party Natalie Fleet MP Restore Britain

Orla Minihane

128,453 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Even after getting an education, you are suddenly told that the doors which should be open to you are closed. 🔹 Manufacturing is closed. 🔹 Entrepreneurship is closed. 🔹 Corporate jobs are being destroyed by AI. 🔹 The public sector is being privatised. 🔹 The only choice many young people have is a government job. You give them one door, close all the others, then rig that system and make it unbelievably expensive. And then you expect them not to be out on the streets. We are 100% in agreement with what every single student is feeling. 👉 There must be consequences for what was done a few days ago. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi
2:00

Even after getting an education, you are suddenly told that the doors which should be open to you are closed. 🔹 Manufacturing is closed. 🔹 Entrepreneurship is closed. 🔹 Corporate jobs are being destroyed by AI. 🔹 The public sector is being privatised. 🔹 The only choice many young people have is a government job. You give them one door, close all the others, then rig that system and make it unbelievably expensive. And then you expect them not to be out on the streets. We are 100% in agreement with what every single student is feeling. 👉 There must be consequences for what was done a few days ago. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi

Congress

25,331 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Andy Burnham's suggestion that middle-class areas—or areas where hard-working families live—should have illegal immigrants imposed on them just shows how out of touch he is. He thinks the solution to this problem is to spread illegal immigrants around the country. In fact, the solution is to immediately deport illegal immigrants who arrive, with no court process, asylum claims, lawyers, or messing around. They should just be deported straight away. They shouldn't be accommodated anywhere—not in hotels, not in villages, nowhere. If somebody enters our country illegally, they should simply be deported straight away. In
0:41

Andy Burnham's suggestion that middle-class areas—or areas where hard-working families live—should have illegal immigrants imposed on them just shows how out of touch he is. He thinks the solution to this problem is to spread illegal immigrants around the country. In fact, the solution is to immediately deport illegal immigrants who arrive, with no court process, asylum claims, lawyers, or messing around. They should just be deported straight away. They shouldn't be accommodated anywhere—not in hotels, not in villages, nowhere. If somebody enters our country illegally, they should simply be deported straight away. In

Chris Philp MP

22,437 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Democrats are the party of deceit & manipulation! All they talk about is how Trump will take women’s rights away but who is really doing it? Democrats have already allowed: 🔹Men in women’s spaces 🔹Men to compete in women’s sports 🔹A man to become Woman of the Year 🔹A man to win Miss Universe 🔹A man to be in Covergirl commercials 🔹Tampons in boys’ bathrooms 🔹Men to go into womens’ bathrooms 🔹A man to step into a ring with a woman who broke her nose 🔹A man that fought a woman in an inmate fight & cracked her skull Democrats are trying to ERASE women, not protect them, and they certainly don’t give a rat’s about your rights!
2:44

Democrats are the party of deceit & manipulation! All they talk about is how Trump will take women’s rights away but who is really doing it? Democrats have already allowed: 🔹Men in women’s spaces 🔹Men to compete in women’s sports 🔹A man to become Woman of the Year 🔹A man to win Miss Universe 🔹A man to be in Covergirl commercials 🔹Tampons in boys’ bathrooms 🔹Men to go into womens’ bathrooms 🔹A man to step into a ring with a woman who broke her nose 🔹A man that fought a woman in an inmate fight & cracked her skull Democrats are trying to ERASE women, not protect them, and they certainly don’t give a rat’s about your rights!

Sequencer

301,946 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“Our policy to stop the boats is very straightforward, remove all benefits from people who successfully get into this country illegally instead of looking after them in four-star hotels, free food, free medical care and so on” Ben Habib tells us how Advance UK would solve the illegal migration crisis “detain them arrest them detain them put them in secure facilities and then deport them that’s the first thing, and then the second thing is direct the Royal Navy to intercept the boats, intercept the dinghies and turn them back to France. That is what the Navy is for the protection of this country, and at the moment we have no borders, and if the country doesn’t have any borders, it isn’t a country, so the Royal Navy has stopped doing its job.” Thankyou Ben Habib
0:42

“Our policy to stop the boats is very straightforward, remove all benefits from people who successfully get into this country illegally instead of looking after them in four-star hotels, free food, free medical care and so on” Ben Habib tells us how Advance UK would solve the illegal migration crisis “detain them arrest them detain them put them in secure facilities and then deport them that’s the first thing, and then the second thing is direct the Royal Navy to intercept the boats, intercept the dinghies and turn them back to France. That is what the Navy is for the protection of this country, and at the moment we have no borders, and if the country doesn’t have any borders, it isn’t a country, so the Royal Navy has stopped doing its job.” Thankyou Ben Habib

Southampton Times

64,022 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This is a painful watch. Why is Reform standing foreign candidates at all? And why is Nigel Farage MP racialising the argument while completely ignoring the bigger point? It’s not complicated. Only the British people should stand in British elections, and only the British people should be able to vote in them. Why bring skin colour into it? This is classic left-wing tactics, deflecting into a race debate instead of addressing a legitimate concern: the sheer number of foreign candidates being put forward who have no ancestral or cultural connection to this country is mental. Should an Englishman be able to stand in an Indian election? Of course not, and I would expect India to never even entertain that as a possibility. Not being able, or willing, to define what it means to be English is no different to not being able to define what a woman is. And on the wider point, X is a platform for free speech. If you don’t like it, you’re free to leave or build your own app. Pathetic words from Farage.
1:11

This is a painful watch. Why is Reform standing foreign candidates at all? And why is Nigel Farage MP racialising the argument while completely ignoring the bigger point? It’s not complicated. Only the British people should stand in British elections, and only the British people should be able to vote in them. Why bring skin colour into it? This is classic left-wing tactics, deflecting into a race debate instead of addressing a legitimate concern: the sheer number of foreign candidates being put forward who have no ancestral or cultural connection to this country is mental. Should an Englishman be able to stand in an Indian election? Of course not, and I would expect India to never even entertain that as a possibility. Not being able, or willing, to define what it means to be English is no different to not being able to define what a woman is. And on the wider point, X is a platform for free speech. If you don’t like it, you’re free to leave or build your own app. Pathetic words from Farage.

Montgomery Toms

11,305 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"
4:22

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"

Farrukh

163,695 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Scottish Citizens Army wants to say how proud we are of the Springburn locals tonight. Over 1,000 people came out to peacefully make their voices heard after the terrible attack on a young girl in the park. This isn’t right wing or left wing politics. It’s not about agendas. It’s about women and children being raped and living in constant danger in their own communities especially with how migrants are being housed in these areas. Enough is enough. Protect our women & kids. Scotland deserves safety. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
0:48

The Scottish Citizens Army wants to say how proud we are of the Springburn locals tonight. Over 1,000 people came out to peacefully make their voices heard after the terrible attack on a young girl in the park. This isn’t right wing or left wing politics. It’s not about agendas. It’s about women and children being raped and living in constant danger in their own communities especially with how migrants are being housed in these areas. Enough is enough. Protect our women & kids. Scotland deserves safety. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Scottish Citizens Army

22,260 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WOULD THIS IDEA WORK AND IS IT THE RIGHT ACTION FOR PEACEFULLY ADDRESSING THE ILEGAL MIGRANTS HOTEL PROBLEM? Dear Grok would a Ghandi like entirely peaceful non cooperation activity by, and / or with suppliers of hotels that are involved in the illegal migrant trade legal? Is it legal in the uk to suggest that traders don’t trade with hotels housing illegal migrants and to suggest that the public boycott and expose on social media and elsewhere those hotels AND THE SUPPLIERS that do? Would this effectively put an end to the practice of housing illegal migrants in hotels and what would it take to do this? In a totally legal and peaceful campaign. How long would you estimate that it would take Grok? Elon Musk Charlie Kirk GB News Andrew Gold Mike Fairclough Nigel Farage MP Reform UK Zia Yusuf Rupert Lowe MP Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Matt Goodwin Bev Turner Charlotte Gill Tucker Carlson Alex Jones Queen Bee The Secret History of Gold - out May 5 Law-or-Fiction Candace Owens Right Said Fred
1:21

WOULD THIS IDEA WORK AND IS IT THE RIGHT ACTION FOR PEACEFULLY ADDRESSING THE ILEGAL MIGRANTS HOTEL PROBLEM? Dear Grok would a Ghandi like entirely peaceful non cooperation activity by, and / or with suppliers of hotels that are involved in the illegal migrant trade legal? Is it legal in the uk to suggest that traders don’t trade with hotels housing illegal migrants and to suggest that the public boycott and expose on social media and elsewhere those hotels AND THE SUPPLIERS that do? Would this effectively put an end to the practice of housing illegal migrants in hotels and what would it take to do this? In a totally legal and peaceful campaign. How long would you estimate that it would take Grok? Elon Musk Charlie Kirk GB News Andrew Gold Mike Fairclough Nigel Farage MP Reform UK Zia Yusuf Rupert Lowe MP Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Matt Goodwin Bev Turner Charlotte Gill Tucker Carlson Alex Jones Queen Bee The Secret History of Gold - out May 5 Law-or-Fiction Candace Owens Right Said Fred

John Mappin

13,111 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Surreal. Lady in glasses blames asylum seekers for women and girls being harmed When it's pointed out that more women and girls are being harmed by people they actually know, and not asylum seekers, she's in denial #BBCQT The silence from the 'blame asylum seekers and immigrants for harm to women' group over white men who statistically harm more women is astonishing And their silence particularly on a grooming gang of rich white men with Epstein is disgraceful No one should be harmed, whether its by an asylum seeker or from someone they know, abuse is wrong in every capacity The fact that so many ignore abuse from white perpetrators of abuse, show they are less interested in the safety of women and girls and more interested in expressing their racism
1:38

Surreal. Lady in glasses blames asylum seekers for women and girls being harmed When it's pointed out that more women and girls are being harmed by people they actually know, and not asylum seekers, she's in denial #BBCQT The silence from the 'blame asylum seekers and immigrants for harm to women' group over white men who statistically harm more women is astonishing And their silence particularly on a grooming gang of rich white men with Epstein is disgraceful No one should be harmed, whether its by an asylum seeker or from someone they know, abuse is wrong in every capacity The fact that so many ignore abuse from white perpetrators of abuse, show they are less interested in the safety of women and girls and more interested in expressing their racism

Farrukh

220,377 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Here it is: FEMA, under the Biden–Harris terrorist administration, spent more than a billion dollars to shelter illegal aliens in four-star hotels while Americans were being devastated by hurricanes. Now you ask, why hotels and not detention shelters? Border Czar Tom Homan: “No one ever talks about it. I’ll talk about it.” “Why did they release people into the interior of the United States rather than put them in an ICE bed? Why not place them in an empty ICE bed — $127 a night — instead of a hotel at $500 a night? The Biden administration did it on purpose. If you put them in an ICE detention bed, they get a hearing in 35 days. But if you release them and put them in a $500-a-night hotel room, their hearings could be five, seven, even nine years away.” In other words, after five, seven, or nine years, Democrats get to keep their voters — and in the meantime, we’ll just call it “disinformation.”
1:09

Here it is: FEMA, under the Biden–Harris terrorist administration, spent more than a billion dollars to shelter illegal aliens in four-star hotels while Americans were being devastated by hurricanes. Now you ask, why hotels and not detention shelters? Border Czar Tom Homan: “No one ever talks about it. I’ll talk about it.” “Why did they release people into the interior of the United States rather than put them in an ICE bed? Why not place them in an empty ICE bed — $127 a night — instead of a hotel at $500 a night? The Biden administration did it on purpose. If you put them in an ICE detention bed, they get a hearing in 35 days. But if you release them and put them in a $500-a-night hotel room, their hearings could be five, seven, even nine years away.” In other words, after five, seven, or nine years, Democrats get to keep their voters — and in the meantime, we’ll just call it “disinformation.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

47,347 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION WHISTLEBLOWER SPEAKS OUT A former Home Office executive officer has broken her silence — and what she’s revealed is devastating. “It terrified me. The types of people coming over — the lies, the criminality — and no one holding them to account.” She says men from Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, and India are arriving without documents, yet still being waved through. No background checks. No proof of identity. Just a name, an interview — and a hotel room. “They just let them through… they get sent to a hotel and told, ‘We’ll be in touch.’” She claims the system is designed to let them in, not stop them — and that management “did everything they could to make it easy.” The whistleblower says illegal crossings spiked after Labour took power and the Rwanda plan was scrapped — removing one of the few deterrents that was working. “When Rwanda was on the table, they were going to Ireland to avoid deportation. The moment it was abolished — the boats came back.” Her verdict is bleak: “Maybe single figures — that’s how many genuinely deserved asylum.” Britain’s border isn’t broken by accident. It’s being erased by design.
2:49

🚨 ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION WHISTLEBLOWER SPEAKS OUT A former Home Office executive officer has broken her silence — and what she’s revealed is devastating. “It terrified me. The types of people coming over — the lies, the criminality — and no one holding them to account.” She says men from Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, and India are arriving without documents, yet still being waved through. No background checks. No proof of identity. Just a name, an interview — and a hotel room. “They just let them through… they get sent to a hotel and told, ‘We’ll be in touch.’” She claims the system is designed to let them in, not stop them — and that management “did everything they could to make it easy.” The whistleblower says illegal crossings spiked after Labour took power and the Rwanda plan was scrapped — removing one of the few deterrents that was working. “When Rwanda was on the table, they were going to Ireland to avoid deportation. The moment it was abolished — the boats came back.” Her verdict is bleak: “Maybe single figures — that’s how many genuinely deserved asylum.” Britain’s border isn’t broken by accident. It’s being erased by design.

Jim Ferguson

437,375 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🔥 Sophy Ridge SNAPS at Labour Victims Minister: “What the hell? Are r*pists not dangerous?” In the middle of a prison overcrowding crisis, Labour’s new early release scheme is letting thousands of inmates out early. Shockingly, r*pists and sexual offenders are NOT being excluded from this scheme! On Sky News this morning, Sophy Ridge put Victims Minister Catherine Atkinson MP squarely on the spot: “Why do you not exclude sexual offenders from the prisons early release scheme?” The minister offered no direct answer and immediately deflected to blame the Conservatives for the mess they inherited. Ridge, having already acknowledged that things weren’t great under the previous government, visibly lost patience and snapped: “I’ve just acknowledged the context. My question is why are you not excluding r*pists from the dangerous offenders? What the hell? They are dangerous aren’t they? Or are they not dangerous if they commit crimes against women?” This is the government’s own Victims Minister. The person meant to champion those harmed by crime could not or would not explain why predators who target women are being prioritised for early freedom. No reassurance for victims, no clear safeguarding plan, just the same tired deflection.
1:48

🔥 Sophy Ridge SNAPS at Labour Victims Minister: “What the hell? Are r*pists not dangerous?” In the middle of a prison overcrowding crisis, Labour’s new early release scheme is letting thousands of inmates out early. Shockingly, r*pists and sexual offenders are NOT being excluded from this scheme! On Sky News this morning, Sophy Ridge put Victims Minister Catherine Atkinson MP squarely on the spot: “Why do you not exclude sexual offenders from the prisons early release scheme?” The minister offered no direct answer and immediately deflected to blame the Conservatives for the mess they inherited. Ridge, having already acknowledged that things weren’t great under the previous government, visibly lost patience and snapped: “I’ve just acknowledged the context. My question is why are you not excluding r*pists from the dangerous offenders? What the hell? They are dangerous aren’t they? Or are they not dangerous if they commit crimes against women?” This is the government’s own Victims Minister. The person meant to champion those harmed by crime could not or would not explain why predators who target women are being prioritised for early freedom. No reassurance for victims, no clear safeguarding plan, just the same tired deflection.

J Stewart

377,198 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Rumours circulating that pontins holiday resort in southport is about to become Britain's biggest MIGRANT CAMP after finally closing its doors to the public Up to 3000 ILLEGAL MIGRANTS could be housed there from the middle of February I take a look inside 👀 Why would they be renovating the place if they new it was closing to the public? 11 years running Brittania Hotels have been voted the worst chain in the country In the last 4 years they have made over £30 million renting their establishments to the home office These contracts have been signed until at least 2034 wake up people We are being replaced Support real activism not click bait.
2:16

Rumours circulating that pontins holiday resort in southport is about to become Britain's biggest MIGRANT CAMP after finally closing its doors to the public Up to 3000 ILLEGAL MIGRANTS could be housed there from the middle of February I take a look inside 👀 Why would they be renovating the place if they new it was closing to the public? 11 years running Brittania Hotels have been voted the worst chain in the country In the last 4 years they have made over £30 million renting their establishments to the home office These contracts have been signed until at least 2034 wake up people We are being replaced Support real activism not click bait.

Active Patriot

489,889 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A homeless Irish man sleeping rough asks the obvious question: why is he the one without a blanket or proper shelter while migrants are housed in tax-funded luxury guarded by security? The contrast could not be clearer or more insulting. Native citizens who built and sustained the country are left on the streets while new arrivals receive better accommodation than many working families could ever afford. This is not compassion. It is a deliberate inversion of priorities. Governments across Britain and Ireland have chosen to spend billions on hotels, converted buildings and high-end facilities for people who entered the country unlawfully or with questionable claims, while veterans, the elderly and ordinary citizens sleep in doorways. The same politicians who lecture about “diversity” and “inclusion” treat their own people as disposable. The policy is unsustainable and morally indefensible. Every pound spent on luxury migrant accommodation is a pound not available for British and Irish citizens in genuine need. Every bed given to someone with no right to be here is a bed denied to a native family or a homeless veteran. The public sees the disparity every day and understands exactly what it means. The only remedy is to stop the inflow immediately and begin large-scale removals. Failed asylum seekers, economic migrants and foreign nationals who commit crimes must be deported. Housing, welfare and public services must be reserved first for the people whose taxes fund them. Anything less guarantees more scenes like this one and deeper resentment from citizens who are being told their country no longer belongs to them. Put our people first. End the madness.
2:20

A homeless Irish man sleeping rough asks the obvious question: why is he the one without a blanket or proper shelter while migrants are housed in tax-funded luxury guarded by security? The contrast could not be clearer or more insulting. Native citizens who built and sustained the country are left on the streets while new arrivals receive better accommodation than many working families could ever afford. This is not compassion. It is a deliberate inversion of priorities. Governments across Britain and Ireland have chosen to spend billions on hotels, converted buildings and high-end facilities for people who entered the country unlawfully or with questionable claims, while veterans, the elderly and ordinary citizens sleep in doorways. The same politicians who lecture about “diversity” and “inclusion” treat their own people as disposable. The policy is unsustainable and morally indefensible. Every pound spent on luxury migrant accommodation is a pound not available for British and Irish citizens in genuine need. Every bed given to someone with no right to be here is a bed denied to a native family or a homeless veteran. The public sees the disparity every day and understands exactly what it means. The only remedy is to stop the inflow immediately and begin large-scale removals. Failed asylum seekers, economic migrants and foreign nationals who commit crimes must be deported. Housing, welfare and public services must be reserved first for the people whose taxes fund them. Anything less guarantees more scenes like this one and deeper resentment from citizens who are being told their country no longer belongs to them. Put our people first. End the madness.

Right over Left Everytime

129,989 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WOW 🚨 England Home Office decision will house illegal migrants on military bases These migrants won’t be required to stay in the barracks, meaning they’ll be infrastructure concerns since these male illegals will be on military bases Liberals are bringing down Europe “Now this news of this legal challenge that could bring more upheaval to that asylum policy. This is important for the government because the government wants to move forward with a system where they can take asylum seekers out of the hotels — and they want to move towards the use of military barracks, either presently used or former military barracks and other suitable sites. That they can put these migrant camps within, but the residents here in this East Sussex town are fighting back because they say that it's completely unsuitable to put, as the government is planning, more than 500 young male asylum seekers in an area where there is just not the infrastructure and real concerns among local people that you have young men who won't be confined to these barracks. It's not a secure accommodation centre. They will be allowed to wander free in the local towns and villages in that area. That's what is so concerning to people in the Croydon area.”
1:16

WOW 🚨 England Home Office decision will house illegal migrants on military bases These migrants won’t be required to stay in the barracks, meaning they’ll be infrastructure concerns since these male illegals will be on military bases Liberals are bringing down Europe “Now this news of this legal challenge that could bring more upheaval to that asylum policy. This is important for the government because the government wants to move forward with a system where they can take asylum seekers out of the hotels — and they want to move towards the use of military barracks, either presently used or former military barracks and other suitable sites. That they can put these migrant camps within, but the residents here in this East Sussex town are fighting back because they say that it's completely unsuitable to put, as the government is planning, more than 500 young male asylum seekers in an area where there is just not the infrastructure and real concerns among local people that you have young men who won't be confined to these barracks. It's not a secure accommodation centre. They will be allowed to wander free in the local towns and villages in that area. That's what is so concerning to people in the Croydon area.”

Wall Street Apes

45,741 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: LABOUR MP ADMITS PLAN TO DUMP ILLEGAL MIGRANTS IN EXPENSIVE HOUSING TO SPREAD RUIN EQUALLY! The mask has completely slipped on the Labour Party. 🤡 A Labour MP has admitted their new policy is to dump illegal migrants into expensive housing, arguing that all British communities should suffer equally! Hardworking taxpayers who saved for years to buy a home are now being forced to fund luxury leases for illegal arrivals! Prime Minister Andy Burnham is not fixing the border crisis, he is engineering the total destruction of our citizen built society. No one voted for this! RT and SHARE this everywhere to expose Labour's war on British homeowners NOW! 🇬🇧🔥
0:40

🚨 BREAKING: LABOUR MP ADMITS PLAN TO DUMP ILLEGAL MIGRANTS IN EXPENSIVE HOUSING TO SPREAD RUIN EQUALLY! The mask has completely slipped on the Labour Party. 🤡 A Labour MP has admitted their new policy is to dump illegal migrants into expensive housing, arguing that all British communities should suffer equally! Hardworking taxpayers who saved for years to buy a home are now being forced to fund luxury leases for illegal arrivals! Prime Minister Andy Burnham is not fixing the border crisis, he is engineering the total destruction of our citizen built society. No one voted for this! RT and SHARE this everywhere to expose Labour's war on British homeowners NOW! 🇬🇧🔥

David Shaw

114,704 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

🚨EPPING PROTESTERS CONVICTED - THIS IS TWO TIER JUSTICE 🚨 Lee Gower (43) and Phillip Curson (53) have been found GUILTY of violent disorder at Chelmsford Crown Court. This is not about excusing violence or bad behaviour. Legitimate protest can and should stay peaceful. But let's be honest: These were local men who turned out because an asylum seeker housed at the Bell Hotel - Hadush Kebatu - had just been charged with sexually assaulting a woman and a 14 year old girl. That anger was real and rooted in genuine community concern. Yet ordinary people protesting failures in immigration and asylum policy now face arrest, court and convictions. Meanwhile, serious offenders like Kebatu get just 12 months in prison, are mistakenly released early instead of being deported and the system bends over backwards for them. Bodycam footage shown in court tells one selective side. What about full context from other angles? The public are not the problem - an unfair, broken system that protects the wrong people is. A push or a shove, how about being able to defend yourself? Did the mainstream media show the pepper spray at the end of the second clip?
0:30

🚨EPPING PROTESTERS CONVICTED - THIS IS TWO TIER JUSTICE 🚨 Lee Gower (43) and Phillip Curson (53) have been found GUILTY of violent disorder at Chelmsford Crown Court. This is not about excusing violence or bad behaviour. Legitimate protest can and should stay peaceful. But let's be honest: These were local men who turned out because an asylum seeker housed at the Bell Hotel - Hadush Kebatu - had just been charged with sexually assaulting a woman and a 14 year old girl. That anger was real and rooted in genuine community concern. Yet ordinary people protesting failures in immigration and asylum policy now face arrest, court and convictions. Meanwhile, serious offenders like Kebatu get just 12 months in prison, are mistakenly released early instead of being deported and the system bends over backwards for them. Bodycam footage shown in court tells one selective side. What about full context from other angles? The public are not the problem - an unfair, broken system that protects the wrong people is. A push or a shove, how about being able to defend yourself? Did the mainstream media show the pepper spray at the end of the second clip?

Gauci Reports

43,866 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I asked the Safeguarding Minister, Jess Phillips, if she'd considered the impact that mass migration has on the safety of women and girls. She said that there's no reliable data on this issue. But that isn't entirely true. There is indicative data, and it is damning. It's true that people from any country, or culture, can be violence towards women and girls, including sexually. It's also true that, regardless of a person's background, we should come down hard on those who commit violent or sexual abuse. However, we should also recognise that not every culture has the same attitudes towards women and girls. In some cultures, for example, it's seen as indecent for a woman to walk around without her hair covered. In most cultures, it’s normal for men and women to be segregated for some things (like getting changed); in some cultures, men and women are segregated for many more things. In some cultures, physical and sexual violence towards women is commonplace. When men from those cultures come to this country, those are the cultural assumptions they bring with them. This makes intuitive sense. Why would we expect people to suddenly adopt British norms, habits, and behaviours, immediately upon arriving here? Particularly when so many people in the British state are unwilling to recognise that different cultures have different norms in the first place? That's not to say that everybody from these cultures poses a threat to women and girls. And of course, some of those people may have wanted to come here to get away from those very cultural expectations. But what we often see is that, 'per capita' (or per person), people from certain nationalities are more likely to commit certain types of crime when they come to the UK. That's particularly true in the case of illegal migrants, who are disproportionately likely to be young men - the group most likely to commit violent or sexual crime. Back in October, Labour MPs voted to block the release of detailed migrant crime data, which would have given us the full picture about how likely different migrant groups are to commit certain crimes. Some nationalities might be more likely to commit crime than British nationals. Others might be less likely. But at least we'd have the data, which would allow us to have an informed debate about this. However, thanks to the hard work of campaigners and journalists, we have some indicative data about the rates at which different nationalities commit crime, including crime which disproportionately targets women and girls. For example, data obtained from the Ministry of Justice last year showed that two nationalities, Afghans and Eritreans, were more than 20 times as likely to be convicted of a sexual offence than British nationals. This data showed that Afghans had a conviction rate for sexual offences of 59 per 10,000 people, while Eritreans had a conviction rate of 53.6 per 10,000 people. British nationals, on the other hand, had a conviction rate of 2.66 per 10,000. People have since disputed those figures. They say that, since the population figures used to work out this data are taken from the 2021 Census, we're likely to be undercounting the number of Afghans and Eritreans in the country. But even if that's true, the rate of conviction for sexual offences would still be much higher amongst Afghans and Eritreans than amongst British nationals. If this indicative data is wrong, then the Government should publish the full figures. Their failure to do so is a choice. We can collect a person's nationality when they're arrested, when they stand trial, and when they go to prison. People deserve to know what impact mass migration is having on the safety of women and girls. We need to be able to tell the truth about the fact that not every culture treats women in the same way, and that when people arrive here, they often bring that cultural baggage with them.
0:49

I asked the Safeguarding Minister, Jess Phillips, if she'd considered the impact that mass migration has on the safety of women and girls. She said that there's no reliable data on this issue. But that isn't entirely true. There is indicative data, and it is damning. It's true that people from any country, or culture, can be violence towards women and girls, including sexually. It's also true that, regardless of a person's background, we should come down hard on those who commit violent or sexual abuse. However, we should also recognise that not every culture has the same attitudes towards women and girls. In some cultures, for example, it's seen as indecent for a woman to walk around without her hair covered. In most cultures, it’s normal for men and women to be segregated for some things (like getting changed); in some cultures, men and women are segregated for many more things. In some cultures, physical and sexual violence towards women is commonplace. When men from those cultures come to this country, those are the cultural assumptions they bring with them. This makes intuitive sense. Why would we expect people to suddenly adopt British norms, habits, and behaviours, immediately upon arriving here? Particularly when so many people in the British state are unwilling to recognise that different cultures have different norms in the first place? That's not to say that everybody from these cultures poses a threat to women and girls. And of course, some of those people may have wanted to come here to get away from those very cultural expectations. But what we often see is that, 'per capita' (or per person), people from certain nationalities are more likely to commit certain types of crime when they come to the UK. That's particularly true in the case of illegal migrants, who are disproportionately likely to be young men - the group most likely to commit violent or sexual crime. Back in October, Labour MPs voted to block the release of detailed migrant crime data, which would have given us the full picture about how likely different migrant groups are to commit certain crimes. Some nationalities might be more likely to commit crime than British nationals. Others might be less likely. But at least we'd have the data, which would allow us to have an informed debate about this. However, thanks to the hard work of campaigners and journalists, we have some indicative data about the rates at which different nationalities commit crime, including crime which disproportionately targets women and girls. For example, data obtained from the Ministry of Justice last year showed that two nationalities, Afghans and Eritreans, were more than 20 times as likely to be convicted of a sexual offence than British nationals. This data showed that Afghans had a conviction rate for sexual offences of 59 per 10,000 people, while Eritreans had a conviction rate of 53.6 per 10,000 people. British nationals, on the other hand, had a conviction rate of 2.66 per 10,000. People have since disputed those figures. They say that, since the population figures used to work out this data are taken from the 2021 Census, we're likely to be undercounting the number of Afghans and Eritreans in the country. But even if that's true, the rate of conviction for sexual offences would still be much higher amongst Afghans and Eritreans than amongst British nationals. If this indicative data is wrong, then the Government should publish the full figures. Their failure to do so is a choice. We can collect a person's nationality when they're arrested, when they stand trial, and when they go to prison. People deserve to know what impact mass migration is having on the safety of women and girls. We need to be able to tell the truth about the fact that not every culture treats women in the same way, and that when people arrive here, they often bring that cultural baggage with them.

Katie Lam

174,637 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten