正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 LANDMARK SUPREME COURT RULING! A person with Higher Qualification CANNOT be considered for a post specifically reserved for less educated candidates🎯 The Court held that HIDING higher education to grab such a job deprives genuinely eligible candidates of their opportunity. Case Background: — A man applied for a... show more

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

141,583 subscribers

85,281 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

#WATCH | Bhavnagar, Gujarat: Dr Ganesh Baraiya overcomes legal hurdles being differently abled and works as a medical officer in a civil hospital. He says, "... My primary education was from my village... I took the NEET UG exam in 2018 but at that time, the Medical Council of India rejected me due to my disability. At that time I was very dejected... We lost the case in the Gujarat High Court but we filed the case in the Supreme Court... The Supreme Court ruled that no one can stop you because of your disability and a seat will be reserved for you in 2019..." (01.12)

#WATCH | Bhavnagar, Gujarat: Dr Ganesh Baraiya overcomes legal hurdles being differently abled and works as a medical officer in a civil hospital. He says, "... My primary education was from my village... I took the NEET UG exam in 2018 but at that time, the Medical Council of India rejected me due to my disability. At that time I was very dejected... We lost the case in the Gujarat High Court but we filed the case in the Supreme Court... The Supreme Court ruled that no one can stop you because of your disability and a seat will be reserved for you in 2019..." (01.12)

ANI

316,371 次观看 • 7 个月前

In a historic decision, the Supreme Court has handed a major legal victory to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), declaring it eligible for a share of reserved seats in national and provincial assemblies. The judgment, announced by a 13-member bench, unanimously ruled that PTI is and will remain a political party. In an 8-5 decision, the Supreme Court has ordered that PTI be given their rightful share of reserved seats, stating that the Election Commission violated the Constitution by denying PTI the opportunity to contest in the 2024 elections. #SeatsBelongToPTI #عمران_خان_جیت_چکا

In a historic decision, the Supreme Court has handed a major legal victory to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), declaring it eligible for a share of reserved seats in national and provincial assemblies. The judgment, announced by a 13-member bench, unanimously ruled that PTI is and will remain a political party. In an 8-5 decision, the Supreme Court has ordered that PTI be given their rightful share of reserved seats, stating that the Election Commission violated the Constitution by denying PTI the opportunity to contest in the 2024 elections. #SeatsBelongToPTI #عمران_خان_جیت_چکا

PTI

12,195 次观看 • 2 年前

The Trump administration wrongly sent a man living in Maryland to a mega-prison in El Salvador, with no hope of him returning to the United States. Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled that he must be brought back. Glenn Greenwald on the SCOTUS ruling:

The Trump administration wrongly sent a man living in Maryland to a mega-prison in El Salvador, with no hope of him returning to the United States. Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled that he must be brought back. Glenn Greenwald on the SCOTUS ruling:

System Update

84,064 次观看 • 1 年前

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,340 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump is immediately moving for a REHEARING of the birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court after he saw billboards pop up along the border to scam our nation LET'S GO! Fight for the republic! "AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump is immediately moving for a REHEARING of the birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court after he saw billboards pop up along the border to scam our nation LET'S GO! Fight for the republic! "AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

Eric Daugherty

497,910 次观看 • 7 天前

Bishal, a Bank of Baroda employee, died by suicide. He wanted to quit. But a Rs 5 lakh bond scared him into staying. He thought the bank would take legal action if he left without paying. I asked a Supreme Court advocate about this. His answer: that fear was not real. A bond like this cannot be enforced in court. Employer cannot sue you just for leaving. Bishal did not know this. Tell every banker you know: a bond cannot trap you. You can leave.

Bishal, a Bank of Baroda employee, died by suicide. He wanted to quit. But a Rs 5 lakh bond scared him into staying. He thought the bank would take legal action if he left without paying. I asked a Supreme Court advocate about this. His answer: that fear was not real. A bond like this cannot be enforced in court. Employer cannot sue you just for leaving. Bishal did not know this. Tell every banker you know: a bond cannot trap you. You can leave.

bankpediaa

12,944 次观看 • 1 个月前

VIDEO | As the Supreme Court stayed a Delhi High Court order suspending ex-BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar's life term for the rape of a woman – then a minor – in Uttar Pradesh's Unnao in 2017, retired IPS officer Kiran Bedi says,“...We all express our gratitude to Supreme Court for staying the judgment in the unjust Sengar case. We thank the Court because it was extremely distressing that a powerful MLA of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly raped a poor minor girl...(in 2017). After that, her father was also killed, her lawyer was murdered, and despite all this, his jail sentence was reduced, with the claim that he had already served six years and could be released... We thank our Supreme Court for stopping this injustice and restoring justice before it could prevail.”

VIDEO | As the Supreme Court stayed a Delhi High Court order suspending ex-BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar's life term for the rape of a woman – then a minor – in Uttar Pradesh's Unnao in 2017, retired IPS officer Kiran Bedi says,“...We all express our gratitude to Supreme Court for staying the judgment in the unjust Sengar case. We thank the Court because it was extremely distressing that a powerful MLA of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly raped a poor minor girl...(in 2017). After that, her father was also killed, her lawyer was murdered, and despite all this, his jail sentence was reduced, with the claim that he had already served six years and could be released... We thank our Supreme Court for stopping this injustice and restoring justice before it could prevail.”

Press Trust of India

66,781 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: SUPREME COURT INVALIDATES ALABAMA'S RACE-BASED HOUSE DISTRICTS *100%* of Alabama's blue seats are racially drawn, and the Supreme Court, 6-3, has just NULLIFIED a previous court ruling that required them Now Alabama is set to use a new House map for the midterms LET'S GO!!! 🔥 The new map is likely to be 6R-1D, but they SHOULD go for gold and make it 7R-0D 🇺🇸

🚨 JUST IN: SUPREME COURT INVALIDATES ALABAMA'S RACE-BASED HOUSE DISTRICTS 100% of Alabama's blue seats are racially drawn, and the Supreme Court, 6-3, has just NULLIFIED a previous court ruling that required them Now Alabama is set to use a new House map for the midterms LET'S GO!!! 🔥 The new map is likely to be 6R-1D, but they SHOULD go for gold and make it 7R-0D 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

359,506 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 WOW! Top Democrats held a private, ANGER-ridden call on Saturday panicking to figure out how to gerrymander Virginia after the 10D-1R map was tossed out One plan: FIRE THE SUPREME COURT, lower the retirement age Another plan: NULLIFY the redistricting rules! "They spoke about a collective determination to flip two or three Republican-held seats under the existing map and discussed a bank-shot proposal to redraw the congressional lines anyway." "The most dramatic idea they discussed, which would be involve the unusual gambit to replace the entire Supreme Court of Virginia with the goal of reinstating their gerrymandered map." "One key to the plan would be having Democrats in Richmond lower the mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court justices." "Can you imagine firing the Virginia Supreme Court? By the way, if you want to take off in a purple state independence who you need to win elections, do that!"

🚨 WOW! Top Democrats held a private, ANGER-ridden call on Saturday panicking to figure out how to gerrymander Virginia after the 10D-1R map was tossed out One plan: FIRE THE SUPREME COURT, lower the retirement age Another plan: NULLIFY the redistricting rules! "They spoke about a collective determination to flip two or three Republican-held seats under the existing map and discussed a bank-shot proposal to redraw the congressional lines anyway." "The most dramatic idea they discussed, which would be involve the unusual gambit to replace the entire Supreme Court of Virginia with the goal of reinstating their gerrymandered map." "One key to the plan would be having Democrats in Richmond lower the mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court justices." "Can you imagine firing the Virginia Supreme Court? By the way, if you want to take off in a purple state independence who you need to win elections, do that!"

Eric Daugherty

227,300 次观看 • 2 个月前

He sh0t a mugger three times in broad daylight and walked into court like he was there to pick up a parking ticket 😭 The confidence of a man who has genuinely never considered the possibility that he could be wrong about anything.

He sh0t a mugger three times in broad daylight and walked into court like he was there to pick up a parking ticket 😭 The confidence of a man who has genuinely never considered the possibility that he could be wrong about anything.

𝑸𝑼𝑬𝑬𝑵 𝑴𝑶𝑻𝑯𝑬𝑹 👑🌬️

43,932 次观看 • 1 个月前

Abbott: The judge who issued the opinion was overturned by a fifth circuit court last year for his most recent decision in redistricting and he got it wrong then. He got this one wrong now I feel confident the Supreme Court is going to agree that this decision was a gross misjudgment.

Abbott: The judge who issued the opinion was overturned by a fifth circuit court last year for his most recent decision in redistricting and he got it wrong then. He got this one wrong now I feel confident the Supreme Court is going to agree that this decision was a gross misjudgment.

Acyn

316,268 次观看 • 7 个月前

AOC: He said himself a friend of 25 years. Justice Thomas has been on the court for 30 years and so to say what he is admitting in his statement.. is that he began this relationship with a billionaire and receiving these gifts after he was appointed to the Supreme Court

AOC: He said himself a friend of 25 years. Justice Thomas has been on the court for 30 years and so to say what he is admitting in his statement.. is that he began this relationship with a billionaire and receiving these gifts after he was appointed to the Supreme Court

Acyn

1,092,523 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says he held back from weighing in on the Supreme Court because he didn’t want to influence the justices. He said he was trying to be “well behaved” and even joked that he wanted to be a “good boy.” But he added something else. He suggested the Court can be sensitive to outside pressure and easily swayed. That’s a striking statement about the judiciary. Trump is framing this as restraint on his part and vulnerability on theirs. The tension between the executive branch and the Court is clearly escalating.

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says he held back from weighing in on the Supreme Court because he didn’t want to influence the justices. He said he was trying to be “well behaved” and even joked that he wanted to be a “good boy.” But he added something else. He suggested the Court can be sensitive to outside pressure and easily swayed. That’s a striking statement about the judiciary. Trump is framing this as restraint on his part and vulnerability on theirs. The tension between the executive branch and the Court is clearly escalating.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

42,690 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 HISTORIC: Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN 'income-only' creamy layer criteria for OBC Reservation — Now, Children of Group C & D Govt employees also ELIGIBLE even if family income crosses 8 Lakh/pa 🤯 The Court said the status and category of parents’ jobs must also be considered. • Key facts clarified: - Current creamy layer income limit is ₹8 lakh per year - Children of Group A and B government officers remain ineligible due to job status The Court rejected the Centre’s plea to rely primarily on the INCOME TEST. The case was pursued for over a decade by children of PSU employees.

🚨 HISTORIC: Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN 'income-only' creamy layer criteria for OBC Reservation — Now, Children of Group C & D Govt employees also ELIGIBLE even if family income crosses 8 Lakh/pa 🤯 The Court said the status and category of parents’ jobs must also be considered. • Key facts clarified: - Current creamy layer income limit is ₹8 lakh per year - Children of Group A and B government officers remain ineligible due to job status The Court rejected the Centre’s plea to rely primarily on the INCOME TEST. The case was pursued for over a decade by children of PSU employees.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

41,402 次观看 • 4 个月前

WATCH: Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna believes there was a violation in turning over former President Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC). “There was a violation in the act of surrender,” Azcuna says, noting that the Rome Statute requires the arrested person to be brought before a local court. However, Azcuna points out that the ICC adheres to the “Male captus bene detentus” principle, which means that “even if the arrest is illegal, the detention can still be legal” based on the gravity of offense. A member of the Constitutional Commission that drafted the 1987 Constitution, Azcuna says there are pending petitions before the Supreme Court. “There was a violation, and there will be consequences for that violation” | Eimor Santos

WATCH: Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna believes there was a violation in turning over former President Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC). “There was a violation in the act of surrender,” Azcuna says, noting that the Rome Statute requires the arrested person to be brought before a local court. However, Azcuna points out that the ICC adheres to the “Male captus bene detentus” principle, which means that “even if the arrest is illegal, the detention can still be legal” based on the gravity of offense. A member of the Constitutional Commission that drafted the 1987 Constitution, Azcuna says there are pending petitions before the Supreme Court. “There was a violation, and there will be consequences for that violation” | Eimor Santos

NewsWatch Plus PH

47,507 次观看 • 1 年前

The Montana Supreme Court overstepped its constitutional boundaries today in its ruling on the Held v. Montana case. Judicial reform was already a top priority for Republican lawmakers in our legislative session that starts in less than three weeks. After today, our message to the judiciary is simply this: buckle up.

The Montana Supreme Court overstepped its constitutional boundaries today in its ruling on the Held v. Montana case. Judicial reform was already a top priority for Republican lawmakers in our legislative session that starts in less than three weeks. After today, our message to the judiciary is simply this: buckle up.

Montana Senate Republicans

14,141 次观看 • 1 年前

New Supreme Court Ruling Allows the IRS to Access Your Bank Records Secretly “It is now completely legal for the IRS to secretly obtain the bank records of third-party individuals who are not under Federal investigation,” reported Facts Matter Roman. “If the IRS is trying to collect back taxes from your friend, well, they can still pull your bank records as well.” Here’s the direct text from the ruling: “The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously ... that it’s lawful for the IRS to secretly obtain the bank records of third parties when collecting on taxes owed. In other words, the nation’s highest court recognized that the IRS isn’t required to notify third parties who aren’t under investigation when seeking a summons for banking records thought to be relevant to the tax delinquency of another person.” It’s likely that you know someone under investigation by the IRS, meaning, in practice, that almost everyone reading this post could be subject to this type of government intrusion.

New Supreme Court Ruling Allows the IRS to Access Your Bank Records Secretly “It is now completely legal for the IRS to secretly obtain the bank records of third-party individuals who are not under Federal investigation,” reported Facts Matter Roman. “If the IRS is trying to collect back taxes from your friend, well, they can still pull your bank records as well.” Here’s the direct text from the ruling: “The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously ... that it’s lawful for the IRS to secretly obtain the bank records of third parties when collecting on taxes owed. In other words, the nation’s highest court recognized that the IRS isn’t required to notify third parties who aren’t under investigation when seeking a summons for banking records thought to be relevant to the tax delinquency of another person.” It’s likely that you know someone under investigation by the IRS, meaning, in practice, that almost everyone reading this post could be subject to this type of government intrusion.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

873,606 次观看 • 3 年前

That’s when CNN tried to push back—with a question about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS-13 gangbanger who was deported by the Trump administration. They claimed it was a “mistake.” 🔥 Trump handed it over to Stephen Miller—and Miller dismantled the narrative. “There's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant, even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens.” He laid out the legal facts: “Two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law... He had a deportation order that was valid.” Then came the jaw-dropping legal twist: “A district court judge tried to tell the administration they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here.” But the Supreme Court slapped that down: “The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful... unanimously stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador... a member of MS-13.” Trump turned to Miller: “What was the ruling the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing?” Miller confirmed: “Yes, it was a 9-0, in our favor.” Then he delivered the knockout punch: “That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about, per the court, can only be directed to him.”

That’s when CNN tried to push back—with a question about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS-13 gangbanger who was deported by the Trump administration. They claimed it was a “mistake.” 🔥 Trump handed it over to Stephen Miller—and Miller dismantled the narrative. “There's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant, even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens.” He laid out the legal facts: “Two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law... He had a deportation order that was valid.” Then came the jaw-dropping legal twist: “A district court judge tried to tell the administration they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here.” But the Supreme Court slapped that down: “The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful... unanimously stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador... a member of MS-13.” Trump turned to Miller: “What was the ruling the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing?” Miller confirmed: “Yes, it was a 9-0, in our favor.” Then he delivered the knockout punch: “That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about, per the court, can only be directed to him.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

623,897 次观看 • 1 年前

“NO MORE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL” WATCH: Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada says the impeachment court will no longer convene, saying majority of senators agree to abide by the Supreme Court ruling that voided the complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. He estimates that 19 to 20 senators favor upholding the ruling, effectively dismissing the complaint. The issue will be discussed and likely put to a vote on August 6. Estrada, however, says that if the Supreme Court grants a motion for reconsideration and reverses its ruling, the Senate will comply and convene the impeachment court | Eimor Santos

“NO MORE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL” WATCH: Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada says the impeachment court will no longer convene, saying majority of senators agree to abide by the Supreme Court ruling that voided the complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. He estimates that 19 to 20 senators favor upholding the ruling, effectively dismissing the complaint. The issue will be discussed and likely put to a vote on August 6. Estrada, however, says that if the Supreme Court grants a motion for reconsideration and reverses its ruling, the Senate will comply and convene the impeachment court | Eimor Santos

NewsWatch Plus PH

77,226 次观看 • 11 个月前