Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Lara Naki Gutmann 🇮🇹 Short Program at Lombardia Trophy 2026! second rn! IM RUNNING 🏃 Incredible performance in her home country 🇮🇹 🎶”One / Run Boy Run”🎶 POINTS: 70.60

54,862 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 1

Фото профиля Halu Lüpü
Halu Lüpü2 дней назад

Luv it

Похожие видео

Happy Birthday to one of the most beloved cricketers of the 90s : Chris Harris... Renowned for his brilliance on the field, his safe hands & quick reflexes made him one of the era’s finest fielders... A cult icon of New Zealand cricket, Be it his calm adaptability with the bat or his cunning slow-medium deliveries , Harris earned his place as one of the most reliable all-rounders in limited-overs cricket... His remarkable 130-run innings against Australia stands out; a tale so extraordinary it warrants its own retelling. Harris was equally instrumental in New Zealand's memorable ICC KnockOut Trophy triumph, forming a decisive 122-run partnership with Chris Cairns in the final against India, clinching a thrilling last-over win... By the time he hung up his boots in 2004, Harris had secured a legacy in the record books. He retired as New Zealand's leading wicket-taker in ODIs with 203 wickets, 5th-highest run-scorer with 4379 runs & second in the list of most catches by a Kiwi fielder, with 96. Even today, two decades later, he remains the all-time highest scorer in ODIs as a No. 7 batter. Despite the advent of T20 cricket after his international career ended, Harris showed his potential in competitions like the ICL & other T20 leagues. He accumulated 626 runs at an incredible average of 71 & took 27 wickets with a miserly economy of 6.25 in just 26 games, leaving fans to imagine what he might have achieved had T20 cricket emerged earlier in his career... Chris Harris may not have been the most flamboyant batter or the quickest bowler, but he embodied the spirit of New Zealand cricket. In a country with a smaller talent pool, Harris personified versatility, teamwork & resilience- qualities that ensured the Black Caps consistent competitiveness on the global stage... Post-retirement, he has continued to influence the game as a perceptive analyst & commentator, further enriching his legacy as a true ambassador of cricket... Since I'm a Fielding enthusiast; Here's a clip of some of his incredible work in the field:

Abhishek AB

11,361 просмотров • 1 год назад

Animation ads are ripping rn Small brands usually never ran them. One 3D ad meant a studio, a storyboard and a month of revisions. So when people are suddenly coming across a clay motion ad for a $30 serum. It's scroll stopping. Arcads just shipped the animation studio and it squashes that whole process into one prompt. Here is what I would do: - Make a list of the top 5 brands in your space - Search each one in the Meta Ad Library - Find the oldest ads they're still running Those are probably the best performers with the highest ROAS. A brand that keeps paying for the same ad for months is getting paid back. - Send them over to the Arcads agent, Mark and ask for the hook, the pain point, the offer - Put in your URL and product image and build that winning angle into your prompt - Generate the same ad in all 6 styles - Keep the first round short (I'd start around 15 seconds and only go longer once a style proves itself) Now you're testing style and angle at the same time, and each creative costs you a few minutes of waiting. - Run every version on Meta as its own ad set - Cut the losers after a few days and keep the style with the highest ROAS - Make 10 more variations in that style with fresh hooks - Find the winners and double down - Repeat with the next brand's angle Animation used to be a brand awareness play for companies with money to burn. Now you can run it as a performance ad and shut it down it in 3 days if it flops.

Rez Karim

10,984 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Anthropic is asking the public for $2 trillion using a revenue number from…2028. That valuation would make it the largest stock market debut in history, ahead of SpaceX, which went public in June at $1.77 trillion. The company last raised privately in May at $965 billion. Investors now expect roughly DOUBLE that in October. And the unusual part is not the size here: Public companies are normally priced off the last 12 months of results, or at a stretch off next year's estimate. Reuters reported on Friday that bankers and investors are applying revenue multiples to Anthropic's forecast for 2028, which is more than two years past the deal. That forecast is $190 billion to $200 billion of annual revenue. It is more than four times the run rate the company disclosed in May. Before dismissing it, look at what the company has actually done, because the growth is not imaginary: Anthropic's annualized revenue run rate was around $9 billion at the end of 2025. By May it was $47 billion and it passed $65 billion at the end of July, a 7x increase inside a year. Second quarter revenue came in above $11.5 billion against roughly $787 million in the same quarter of 2025. The company projected its first quarterly operating profit of $559 million. Investors expect the run rate to reach $100 billion to $120 billion before the year closes. By comparison, OpenAI's run rate sat near $40 billion at the end of July, around 60% of Anthropic's. So the growth is real. But the question is whether anyone can price three more years of it. Because the things that could bend that curve are already visible today: Anthropic's top model costs more than two and a half times OpenAI's flagship. Chinese open-weight models deliver usable performance at a fraction of either price. And revenue growth slowed in June when the Commerce Department temporarily restricted exports of the company's best models, which is a reminder that a single government decision can reach directly into the forecast. Now look at what the multiple HAS to be… Palantir trades at 53 times expected 2026 revenue, which already makes it one of the most expensive stocks on the market. Cloudflare and SpaceX both sit near 41.6 times. Those are the reference points bankers are using. One investor told the Financial Times that a company growing at 800% a year should command at least 30 times revenue, which on their own math points to $3 trillion rather than two. And there is one more thing worth holding onto: Anthropic filed confidentially with the SEC in June and has been in a quiet period since. Every figure in this post reached the public through people speaking anonymously, and the company has declined to comment on all of it. So the largest listing ever attempted is being marketed to public investors through numbers none of them can independently check, against a forecast for a year that has not started yet. This is becoming the house style of the 2026 IPO market rather than a one-off. Cerebras priced its listing on ramping infrastructure demand. SpaceX built its debut around an addressable market model that reached years past its actual financials. Both asked buyers to fund a shape rather than a result. Anthropic is the biggest version of that trade anyone has attempted. The bull case is straightforward and it MIGHT be correct: A business compounding this fast, already turning an operating profit, selling into enterprises that are rebuilding their workflows around it, may look cheap at $2 trillion in three years. The bear case is equally simple: Every dollar of that valuation above the current run rate is a forecast, and whoever buys the stock in October is the one holding that forecast if the curve bends. Do you believe in Anthropic?

Ricardo

18,076 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NIL could have a new meaning in the NFL: National Insert League. I manually charted every snap of the entire 2025 Rams offense, the highest scoring team in the NFL. Insert action was everywhere: motions, alignments, blocks and play action, with both wide receivers and tight ends. Including the playoffs, roughly one third of their under center first and second down plays featured some kind of insert component. Duo accounted for nearly 40% of their run offense, the highest rate in the NFL according to Fantasy Points Data. Many of those runs featured insert blocks. On under center early downs, their runs with insert action produced 5.05 yards per play, a 53.5% success rate and +0.07 EPA per play. But their duo identity created an incredible dilemma for defenses: commit inside to stop it, and risk getting outflanked outside to that same side. Running outside zone toward the three player side of 3x1 formations, the Rams produced 565 yards on 81 carries: 7.0 yards per carry, a 61.7% success rate and +0.23 EPA per play. Watching those runs, what stood out was how often they got the edge of the defense for big gains. The frequency was staggering. Looking through at least a decade of data, I couldn’t find another team remotely close to that effectiveness on those runs. They could do it from 11 or 13 personnel, running both duo and outside zone and presenting the same problem with different personnel on the field. Widen to protect the edge, and they could come right back to duo. React aggressively to the insert action, and they could throw behind you. The insert wasn’t just a wrinkle. It helped tie the interior run, perimeter run and play action game together. My top offensive trend prediction for the 2026 season: more teams building around insert action, pairing duo inside with outside zone to the same side, and tying it together with play action. Examples below:

Ryan Paganetti

299,291 просмотров • 13 дней назад