Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Larry Ellison did an impression of a journalist. It was more devastating than anything they have ever written about him. For years the press ran the same line about his friend. Elon does not know what he is doing. Ellison got tired of hearing it, so he started doing...

r0ck3t23's profile picture

Dustin

38,933 subscribers

29,253 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Larry Ellison defending Elon Musk to a reporter who said he was an idiot: Reporter: "Elon doesn't know what he's doing. He's going to have to go out for money. I'm really smart. I work for The Wall Street Journal." Larry: "Who are you? He's landing rockets on robot drone rafts in the ocean."
0:25

Larry Ellison defending Elon Musk to a reporter who said he was an idiot: Reporter: "Elon doesn't know what he's doing. He's going to have to go out for money. I'm really smart. I work for The Wall Street Journal." Larry: "Who are you? He's landing rockets on robot drone rafts in the ocean."

David Senra

32,351 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

You hear the name Larry Ellison a lot, but who he is? Let Nick Fuentes give you real knowledge nobody else will: “Larry Ellison recently became the 2nd richest man in the world. Who is Larry Ellison? Good question!” “So he is now worth north of $300 billion, he’s the founder of Oracle…Larry Ellison is jewish, Larry Ellison is an atheist. But he feels very strongly about being jewish, so strongly that he’s a huge supporter of Israel…he’s the number one private benefactor of the Israeli Defense Force.” “How much does he support Israel? He’s a personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu. When Benjamin Netanyahu was indicted by his own government, Larry Ellison helped get Netanyahu a lawyer.” “So the 2nd richest man in the world, an American billionaire running one the most important tech companies went to one of the most richest and famous and powerful jewish movie producers and said hey Arden, can you dismiss your lawyer? Netanyahu is in trouble.” “Netanyahu has vacationed on Ellison’s private island that he owns in Hawaii.” Did you know Larry Ellison just bought TikTok in a forced sale? Nick explains that too. “So, go figure. The jewish lobby bans TikTok, the jewish lobby gets Trump to buy TikTok. What do you think they’re going to do with it? They’re going to ban antisemitism.” How about Bari Weiss? Alan Dershowitz? Nick drops another knowledge bomb. Everything goes together. It all makes sense. “They’re going to get Bari Weiss to run CBS. Bari Weiss is a jewish spy.” “This is what’s going on. This is who Bari Weiss is. This is what she’s a part of.” “Alan Dershowitz was Jeffery Epstein’s lawyer, who’s is 86 years old.” “According to Tucker Carlson, that’s jew hatred. Everything I said up until this point is jew hatred. Tucker characterizes that as jew hatred…well Tucker, it’s a little bit bigger than Israel influencing congress. There’s a little bit more to the story and it doesn’t make me a jew hater for saying that.”
9:12

You hear the name Larry Ellison a lot, but who he is? Let Nick Fuentes give you real knowledge nobody else will: “Larry Ellison recently became the 2nd richest man in the world. Who is Larry Ellison? Good question!” “So he is now worth north of $300 billion, he’s the founder of Oracle…Larry Ellison is jewish, Larry Ellison is an atheist. But he feels very strongly about being jewish, so strongly that he’s a huge supporter of Israel…he’s the number one private benefactor of the Israeli Defense Force.” “How much does he support Israel? He’s a personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu. When Benjamin Netanyahu was indicted by his own government, Larry Ellison helped get Netanyahu a lawyer.” “So the 2nd richest man in the world, an American billionaire running one the most important tech companies went to one of the most richest and famous and powerful jewish movie producers and said hey Arden, can you dismiss your lawyer? Netanyahu is in trouble.” “Netanyahu has vacationed on Ellison’s private island that he owns in Hawaii.” Did you know Larry Ellison just bought TikTok in a forced sale? Nick explains that too. “So, go figure. The jewish lobby bans TikTok, the jewish lobby gets Trump to buy TikTok. What do you think they’re going to do with it? They’re going to ban antisemitism.” How about Bari Weiss? Alan Dershowitz? Nick drops another knowledge bomb. Everything goes together. It all makes sense. “They’re going to get Bari Weiss to run CBS. Bari Weiss is a jewish spy.” “This is what’s going on. This is who Bari Weiss is. This is what she’s a part of.” “Alan Dershowitz was Jeffery Epstein’s lawyer, who’s is 86 years old.” “According to Tucker Carlson, that’s jew hatred. Everything I said up until this point is jew hatred. Tucker characterizes that as jew hatred…well Tucker, it’s a little bit bigger than Israel influencing congress. There’s a little bit more to the story and it doesn’t make me a jew hater for saying that.”

Fractured Light

216,929 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Larry Ellison just did in code what Washington couldn’t do in twenty years. Twenty years of hearings. Twenty years of funerals. Twenty years of the same argument while the body count climbed. Ellison stopped waiting. Ellison: “We think we can absolutely lock down schools… dramatically reduce the case of anyone being on campus that doesn’t belong on campus.” He is not lobbying Congress. He is not writing op-eds. He is writing software. The American school has always been a soft target dressed up as a fortress. A buzzer at the front door. A sign-in sheet nobody reads. A guard watching one hallway out of fifty. It worked because most days, nobody was trying. Ellison is deleting that fiction. Every face authenticated at the gate. Every inch of the campus watched by something that never sleeps. Every movement measured against a model of what belongs. Ellison: “The second someone pulls out a gun… use AI cameras to immediately recognize that.” The camera is not recording evidence for the trial afterward. The camera is hunting. It knows the silhouette of a pistol the way a hawk knows the silhouette of a rabbit. It triggers the lockdown before the first round is chambered. It seals the doors while the shooter is still deciding whether to walk through them. A human guard reacts in seconds. A terrified teacher reacts in seconds. A 911 call connects in minutes. A machine reacts in milliseconds and never looks away. We spent two decades treating this as a moral argument. Rights versus regulation. Access versus treatment. Prayers versus policy. The debate produced speeches. It never produced safety. Ellison treats it as an engineering problem. Make the attack architecturally impossible. The argument becomes irrelevant. That is the shift nobody voted on. The future of the American classroom is not being decided in the Senate. It is being decided in a server rack. Parents did not ask for this. Teachers did not design this. No child ever asked to be guarded by a camera that knows what a gun looks like. The fortress is going up anyway. While the country argued about the right answer, a handful of engineers shipped one. The school of the future is not a building. It is a perimeter enforced by code. And it will guard your children whether you asked for it or not.
0:24

Larry Ellison just did in code what Washington couldn’t do in twenty years. Twenty years of hearings. Twenty years of funerals. Twenty years of the same argument while the body count climbed. Ellison stopped waiting. Ellison: “We think we can absolutely lock down schools… dramatically reduce the case of anyone being on campus that doesn’t belong on campus.” He is not lobbying Congress. He is not writing op-eds. He is writing software. The American school has always been a soft target dressed up as a fortress. A buzzer at the front door. A sign-in sheet nobody reads. A guard watching one hallway out of fifty. It worked because most days, nobody was trying. Ellison is deleting that fiction. Every face authenticated at the gate. Every inch of the campus watched by something that never sleeps. Every movement measured against a model of what belongs. Ellison: “The second someone pulls out a gun… use AI cameras to immediately recognize that.” The camera is not recording evidence for the trial afterward. The camera is hunting. It knows the silhouette of a pistol the way a hawk knows the silhouette of a rabbit. It triggers the lockdown before the first round is chambered. It seals the doors while the shooter is still deciding whether to walk through them. A human guard reacts in seconds. A terrified teacher reacts in seconds. A 911 call connects in minutes. A machine reacts in milliseconds and never looks away. We spent two decades treating this as a moral argument. Rights versus regulation. Access versus treatment. Prayers versus policy. The debate produced speeches. It never produced safety. Ellison treats it as an engineering problem. Make the attack architecturally impossible. The argument becomes irrelevant. That is the shift nobody voted on. The future of the American classroom is not being decided in the Senate. It is being decided in a server rack. Parents did not ask for this. Teachers did not design this. No child ever asked to be guarded by a camera that knows what a gun looks like. The fortress is going up anyway. While the country argued about the right answer, a handful of engineers shipped one. The school of the future is not a building. It is a perimeter enforced by code. And it will guard your children whether you asked for it or not.

Dustin

10,157 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Larry Ellison just described the death of the unobserved world. Nobody blinked. Everyone is arguing about AI taking desk jobs. Ellison put it in the sky. Ellison: “A drone spots the forest fire and the drone then drops down and looks around to see if there’s a human being near that heat bloom.” That drone doesn’t call it in. It doesn’t wait for instructions. It descends on its own and hunts for the person who lit it. Ellison: “Either had an unattended campfire that caught fire or it’s arson. We can detect all of that.” Detect. Not film. Not log. Detect. A machine above the tree line is not watching a fire. It is deciding whether that fire was a mistake or a crime. A machine is reading human intent from altitude. No officer. No warrant. No human being involved at any step. Ellison: “That’s all, all done autonomously with AI.” We spent two decades in a public war over cameras on street corners. The entire fight assumed surveillance had boundaries. Cities. Intersections. Jurisdictions. Places with addresses and laws. Nobody planned for the version that grew wings and left for land no law was written to cover. A camera records the past. A human reviews it. A judgment happens later. An autonomous drone judges the present before anyone on the ground knows it’s overhead. The wilderness was the last geography on Earth with no lens pointed at it. The last place a person could go where nothing was watching. That’s gone. You can walk into the deepest forest on the continent. Something above you already decided why you’re there.
0:24

Larry Ellison just described the death of the unobserved world. Nobody blinked. Everyone is arguing about AI taking desk jobs. Ellison put it in the sky. Ellison: “A drone spots the forest fire and the drone then drops down and looks around to see if there’s a human being near that heat bloom.” That drone doesn’t call it in. It doesn’t wait for instructions. It descends on its own and hunts for the person who lit it. Ellison: “Either had an unattended campfire that caught fire or it’s arson. We can detect all of that.” Detect. Not film. Not log. Detect. A machine above the tree line is not watching a fire. It is deciding whether that fire was a mistake or a crime. A machine is reading human intent from altitude. No officer. No warrant. No human being involved at any step. Ellison: “That’s all, all done autonomously with AI.” We spent two decades in a public war over cameras on street corners. The entire fight assumed surveillance had boundaries. Cities. Intersections. Jurisdictions. Places with addresses and laws. Nobody planned for the version that grew wings and left for land no law was written to cover. A camera records the past. A human reviews it. A judgment happens later. An autonomous drone judges the present before anyone on the ground knows it’s overhead. The wilderness was the last geography on Earth with no lens pointed at it. The last place a person could go where nothing was watching. That’s gone. You can walk into the deepest forest on the continent. Something above you already decided why you’re there.

Dustin

32,866 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Larry Ellison just told every AI company on Earth they’re fighting the wrong war. The entire industry is racing to build the smartest model. More parameters. Better benchmarks. Faster inference. Ellison isn’t building a model. He’s controlling what every model needs to be useful. Every frontier AI trains on the same public internet. Same scraped pages. Same recycled text. When everyone has the same data, it’s not an advantage. It’s a floor. The only data that creates separation is private. Medical records. Financial models. Defense systems. Proprietary research locked behind firewalls for decades. That data already lives inside Oracle databases. Not Google’s. Not Microsoft’s. Not Amazon’s. Ellison didn’t enter the model war. He positioned himself above it. He rebuilt the database so AI can reason on private data without ever absorbing it. Training folds your data into the model permanently. Once it’s in, it never comes back out. Reasoning thinks with your data and hands back only the answer. The data never moves. One is surrender. The other is sovereignty. Ellison: “These are remarkable electronic brains.” He didn’t build the brain. He owns what the brain needs to think. Everyone is building the most powerful mind in human history. A mind is only as valuable as what it’s allowed to know. Own the knowledge and it doesn’t matter who builds the brain. That pattern has held through every era of human civilization. AI doesn’t break it. It proves it.
2:07

Larry Ellison just told every AI company on Earth they’re fighting the wrong war. The entire industry is racing to build the smartest model. More parameters. Better benchmarks. Faster inference. Ellison isn’t building a model. He’s controlling what every model needs to be useful. Every frontier AI trains on the same public internet. Same scraped pages. Same recycled text. When everyone has the same data, it’s not an advantage. It’s a floor. The only data that creates separation is private. Medical records. Financial models. Defense systems. Proprietary research locked behind firewalls for decades. That data already lives inside Oracle databases. Not Google’s. Not Microsoft’s. Not Amazon’s. Ellison didn’t enter the model war. He positioned himself above it. He rebuilt the database so AI can reason on private data without ever absorbing it. Training folds your data into the model permanently. Once it’s in, it never comes back out. Reasoning thinks with your data and hands back only the answer. The data never moves. One is surrender. The other is sovereignty. Ellison: “These are remarkable electronic brains.” He didn’t build the brain. He owns what the brain needs to think. Everyone is building the most powerful mind in human history. A mind is only as valuable as what it’s allowed to know. Own the knowledge and it doesn’t matter who builds the brain. That pattern has held through every era of human civilization. AI doesn’t break it. It proves it.

Dustin

97,904 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Peter Thiel on why the best businesses never compete: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms." His point is simple: "A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away." Peter explains that the most important distinction in business is one nobody talks about enough. "There are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive and there are companies that have monopolies." His go-to example of a bad business? Restaurants. "Opening a restaurant is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it." His example of a great business: Google. "Google has had no competition in search since 2002 when it definitively distanced itself from Microsoft and Yahoo, and it's been making enormous profits for the dozen years or so ever since." So what should founders actually aim for? "If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur—it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." True market power means never having to compete in the first place.
1:19

Peter Thiel on why the best businesses never compete: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms." His point is simple: "A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away." Peter explains that the most important distinction in business is one nobody talks about enough. "There are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive and there are companies that have monopolies." His go-to example of a bad business? Restaurants. "Opening a restaurant is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it." His example of a great business: Google. "Google has had no competition in search since 2002 when it definitively distanced itself from Microsoft and Yahoo, and it's been making enormous profits for the dozen years or so ever since." So what should founders actually aim for? "If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur—it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." True market power means never having to compete in the first place.

Big Brain Business

73,938 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Elon Musk was asked what the economy looks like in ten years. He didn’t describe a boom or a crash. He gave a date. Musk: “Money won’t matter in 2036.” He isn’t predicting collapse. He’s predicting so much supply that accounting can no longer describe it. Musk: “You need the end effectors in the form of humanoid robotics.” End effectors. Hands. Every economy that ever existed was capped by the number of hands available and the hours inside them. That cap is most of human history. Famine was a hands problem. Empire was a hands problem. Slavery was the worst answer anyone ever gave to a hands problem. Musk: “you can go from intelligence manifesting itself only digitally to shaping atoms.” Intelligence has been stuck behind glass since the first computer. Every idea it ever had still needed human hands to carry it out. Musk: “you have a sort of a quasi-infinite economy.” The interesting part isn’t whether the abundance arrives. It’s what money turns out to have been. Not paper. Not a number in an app. A dollar is a claim on somebody else’s hours. Every price you ever paid was a bid on a piece of a stranger’s life. Every wage you ever earned was somebody bidding on yours. So “money won’t matter” is not a sentence about currency. It’s a sentence about need. If nobody has to buy your hours, the claim has nothing left to point at. Musk: “You want money for food, housing, transport, entertainment.” That list is accurate, and it is the smallest a person has ever been reduced to. A stomach and an address. Nobody has ever wanted only that. Under every paycheck was a second thing that never printed on the stub. Proof that a stranger somewhere needed something only you could give. The economy was the largest machine ever built for making strangers necessary to each other. The goods were the byproduct. Every ancestor of yours worked so the next one wouldn’t have to. Nobody ever wrote down what to do on the day someone finally didn’t. We already know what happens when the supply arrives and the necessity leaves. We have run it one person at a time for a century. The retired man with a full account and nothing waiting for him in the morning. The lottery winner who comes apart with every need met. Nobody in that condition was ever cured by more. Musk: “There’s no analogy or metaphor that I think illustrates the magnitude of change that we’re going to experience here.” He’s right, and it runs deeper than economics. Every era before this one organized itself around scarcity. Take scarcity out and there is nothing left to compare it to. Notice what abundance never touches. Anything that can be copied falls to zero. What remains is everything that can’t. Land. Rank. Being first. The attention of one specific person who could be spending it somewhere else. Abundance doesn’t kill money. It strips it down to the only things it was ever really buying. The goods, the services, the things we spent ten thousand years calling wealth, turn out to have been the easy part. So the question waiting in 2036 isn’t how you’ll get by. Provision is handled. It’s what you answer when nothing requires you and everything is given. Most of us were never chosen. We were needed, and needed was close enough to live on. That difference has never once been tested. Abundance is the test. Nothing will be missing. You will be.
1:53

Elon Musk was asked what the economy looks like in ten years. He didn’t describe a boom or a crash. He gave a date. Musk: “Money won’t matter in 2036.” He isn’t predicting collapse. He’s predicting so much supply that accounting can no longer describe it. Musk: “You need the end effectors in the form of humanoid robotics.” End effectors. Hands. Every economy that ever existed was capped by the number of hands available and the hours inside them. That cap is most of human history. Famine was a hands problem. Empire was a hands problem. Slavery was the worst answer anyone ever gave to a hands problem. Musk: “you can go from intelligence manifesting itself only digitally to shaping atoms.” Intelligence has been stuck behind glass since the first computer. Every idea it ever had still needed human hands to carry it out. Musk: “you have a sort of a quasi-infinite economy.” The interesting part isn’t whether the abundance arrives. It’s what money turns out to have been. Not paper. Not a number in an app. A dollar is a claim on somebody else’s hours. Every price you ever paid was a bid on a piece of a stranger’s life. Every wage you ever earned was somebody bidding on yours. So “money won’t matter” is not a sentence about currency. It’s a sentence about need. If nobody has to buy your hours, the claim has nothing left to point at. Musk: “You want money for food, housing, transport, entertainment.” That list is accurate, and it is the smallest a person has ever been reduced to. A stomach and an address. Nobody has ever wanted only that. Under every paycheck was a second thing that never printed on the stub. Proof that a stranger somewhere needed something only you could give. The economy was the largest machine ever built for making strangers necessary to each other. The goods were the byproduct. Every ancestor of yours worked so the next one wouldn’t have to. Nobody ever wrote down what to do on the day someone finally didn’t. We already know what happens when the supply arrives and the necessity leaves. We have run it one person at a time for a century. The retired man with a full account and nothing waiting for him in the morning. The lottery winner who comes apart with every need met. Nobody in that condition was ever cured by more. Musk: “There’s no analogy or metaphor that I think illustrates the magnitude of change that we’re going to experience here.” He’s right, and it runs deeper than economics. Every era before this one organized itself around scarcity. Take scarcity out and there is nothing left to compare it to. Notice what abundance never touches. Anything that can be copied falls to zero. What remains is everything that can’t. Land. Rank. Being first. The attention of one specific person who could be spending it somewhere else. Abundance doesn’t kill money. It strips it down to the only things it was ever really buying. The goods, the services, the things we spent ten thousand years calling wealth, turn out to have been the easy part. So the question waiting in 2036 isn’t how you’ll get by. Provision is handled. It’s what you answer when nothing requires you and everything is given. Most of us were never chosen. We were needed, and needed was close enough to live on. That difference has never once been tested. Abundance is the test. Nothing will be missing. You will be.

Dustin

39,098 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Larry Ellison just put a price on police accountability. It is $70. Everyone is arguing about AI copyright law. Ellison is building a total surveillance architecture for American law enforcement. He started by gutting the hardware racket. Larry Ellison: “Our body cameras cost 70 bucks. Normal body camera costs $7,000. Our body cameras are simply lenses, two lenses attached to your vest, attached to the smartphone you’re wearing.” A body camera used to be $7,000 of proprietary hardware. Ellison reduced it to a $70 lens leeching compute off the phone in the officer’s pocket. That is not a product improvement. That is the deliberate destruction of a pricing structure built to limit how many eyes the state can afford to open. Slash the cost of observation by 99% and you do not upgrade the system. You make total deployment a mathematical certainty. But the cheap glass is bait. The real architecture begins after the lens. Ellison: “The camera is always on. You don’t turn it on and off. The truth is, we don’t really turn it off.” For decades the fatal flaw in police accountability was a button. One human decided when the recording started. The same human decided when it stopped. Footage vanished at the exact moment it mattered most. Ellison deleted the button. Ellison: “What we do is, we record it so no one can see it. But no one can get into that recording without a court order.” The officer still feels private. They are not. The hardware writes continuously to a sealed record only a judge can unlock. Unrecorded space around an armed agent of the state just became a legal fiction. But recording everything creates an impossible problem. A million hours of footage is worthless if nobody watches it. You cannot hire enough humans to review every shift, every stop, every escalation. So the data rots on a server. Always arriving after the damage is done. Ellison solved it the only way that scales. He replaced the watchers. Ellison: “It’s not people that are looking at those cameras, it’s AI that’s looking at the cameras.” An autonomous system watches every frame in real time. Every escalation flagged. Every use of force scored. Ellison: “Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times. And if there’s a problem, AI will report the problem.” The chain of command for armed state authority just became a machine that does not sleep, does not cover for its own, and does not forget. We spent a decade asking who watches the watchers. Ellison did not reform the watchers. He made them obsolete. AI is not just coming for white-collar jobs. It is becoming the permanent, unblinking authority over the only people in your city authorized to kill. $70 and an algorithm that never looks away. That is the new chain of command.
2:46

Larry Ellison just put a price on police accountability. It is $70. Everyone is arguing about AI copyright law. Ellison is building a total surveillance architecture for American law enforcement. He started by gutting the hardware racket. Larry Ellison: “Our body cameras cost 70 bucks. Normal body camera costs $7,000. Our body cameras are simply lenses, two lenses attached to your vest, attached to the smartphone you’re wearing.” A body camera used to be $7,000 of proprietary hardware. Ellison reduced it to a $70 lens leeching compute off the phone in the officer’s pocket. That is not a product improvement. That is the deliberate destruction of a pricing structure built to limit how many eyes the state can afford to open. Slash the cost of observation by 99% and you do not upgrade the system. You make total deployment a mathematical certainty. But the cheap glass is bait. The real architecture begins after the lens. Ellison: “The camera is always on. You don’t turn it on and off. The truth is, we don’t really turn it off.” For decades the fatal flaw in police accountability was a button. One human decided when the recording started. The same human decided when it stopped. Footage vanished at the exact moment it mattered most. Ellison deleted the button. Ellison: “What we do is, we record it so no one can see it. But no one can get into that recording without a court order.” The officer still feels private. They are not. The hardware writes continuously to a sealed record only a judge can unlock. Unrecorded space around an armed agent of the state just became a legal fiction. But recording everything creates an impossible problem. A million hours of footage is worthless if nobody watches it. You cannot hire enough humans to review every shift, every stop, every escalation. So the data rots on a server. Always arriving after the damage is done. Ellison solved it the only way that scales. He replaced the watchers. Ellison: “It’s not people that are looking at those cameras, it’s AI that’s looking at the cameras.” An autonomous system watches every frame in real time. Every escalation flagged. Every use of force scored. Ellison: “Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times. And if there’s a problem, AI will report the problem.” The chain of command for armed state authority just became a machine that does not sleep, does not cover for its own, and does not forget. We spent a decade asking who watches the watchers. Ellison did not reform the watchers. He made them obsolete. AI is not just coming for white-collar jobs. It is becoming the permanent, unblinking authority over the only people in your city authorized to kill. $70 and an algorithm that never looks away. That is the new chain of command.

Dustin

20,871 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.
16:33

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.

Jaynit

77,758 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Elon Musk just put a price tag on obedience. It costs $200,000. Musk: “You don’t need college to learn stuff. Everything is available basically for free. You can learn anything you want for free.” Every lecture. Every textbook. Every framework ever written. Free on any screen in any country right now. The entire knowledge monopoly collapsed in a decade. Nobody updated the price tag. Musk: “Colleges are basically for fun and to prove you can do your chores. But they’re not for learning.” Strip the ivy and the branding. What’s underneath is a four-year obedience trial. Can this person follow instructions on a schedule without asking why. Musk: “There is a value that colleges have, which is seeing whether somebody can work hard at something, including a bunch of annoying homework assignments, and still do their homework assignments.” That is the entire six-figure value proposition. Not what you know. Not what you can build. Whether you can be managed. The establishment doesn’t need you educated. It needs you domesticated. Musk: “If you’re trying to do something exceptional, you must have evidence of exceptional ability. I don’t consider going to college evidence of exceptional ability.” The system doesn’t produce exceptional. It produces manageable. It takes the most creative years of your life and teaches you to wait for instructions. That is not education. That is containment. Musk: “Gates is a pretty smart guy, he dropped out. Jobs is pretty smart, he dropped out. Larry Ellison, smart guy, he dropped out.” They didn’t leave because they couldn’t keep up. They left because the ceiling was underground. 8 billion people now carry the same library in their pocket. The one these institutions charged a lifetime of debt to access. The only product the university still sells is the belief that you need one.
1:25

Elon Musk just put a price tag on obedience. It costs $200,000. Musk: “You don’t need college to learn stuff. Everything is available basically for free. You can learn anything you want for free.” Every lecture. Every textbook. Every framework ever written. Free on any screen in any country right now. The entire knowledge monopoly collapsed in a decade. Nobody updated the price tag. Musk: “Colleges are basically for fun and to prove you can do your chores. But they’re not for learning.” Strip the ivy and the branding. What’s underneath is a four-year obedience trial. Can this person follow instructions on a schedule without asking why. Musk: “There is a value that colleges have, which is seeing whether somebody can work hard at something, including a bunch of annoying homework assignments, and still do their homework assignments.” That is the entire six-figure value proposition. Not what you know. Not what you can build. Whether you can be managed. The establishment doesn’t need you educated. It needs you domesticated. Musk: “If you’re trying to do something exceptional, you must have evidence of exceptional ability. I don’t consider going to college evidence of exceptional ability.” The system doesn’t produce exceptional. It produces manageable. It takes the most creative years of your life and teaches you to wait for instructions. That is not education. That is containment. Musk: “Gates is a pretty smart guy, he dropped out. Jobs is pretty smart, he dropped out. Larry Ellison, smart guy, he dropped out.” They didn’t leave because they couldn’t keep up. They left because the ceiling was underground. 8 billion people now carry the same library in their pocket. The one these institutions charged a lifetime of debt to access. The only product the university still sells is the belief that you need one.

Dustin

1,395,266 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Elon Musk did something no one in Washington has survived in a hundred years. He counted. You can lie in Washington and die of old age. Lies get you a committee seat. A pension. A statue with your name on it. The one thing the system cannot survive is an honest number. Musk: “You turn off the money spigot to fraudsters, they get very upset to say the least. My death threat level went ballistic.” Nobody threatens to kill you over inefficiency. Nobody puts a target on your back for a rounding error. They only reach for the knife when you touch the money. The press cut his villain edit before he finished the sentence. Politicians moved in formation. Same lines. Same hour. All guarding the same invoice. Joe Rogan: “The whole machine turns on you because you were getting in the way of this amazing graft.” Musk: “The goal was to destroy me absolutely.” $200 to $300 billion a year in fraud. A shadow economy the size of a G20 nation, stitched into your paycheck. Then he said the line they will never forgive. Musk: “Probably cut the federal budget in half. And get more done.” Half of what leaves your paycheck was never roads. Never schools. Never a country. It was feeding the thing that lives only as long as you never look. He looked. That is the whole story. Not that he was loud. Not that he was rich. That he was right. Out loud. With the receipts. The death threats were not a warning. They were a confession.
1:10

Elon Musk did something no one in Washington has survived in a hundred years. He counted. You can lie in Washington and die of old age. Lies get you a committee seat. A pension. A statue with your name on it. The one thing the system cannot survive is an honest number. Musk: “You turn off the money spigot to fraudsters, they get very upset to say the least. My death threat level went ballistic.” Nobody threatens to kill you over inefficiency. Nobody puts a target on your back for a rounding error. They only reach for the knife when you touch the money. The press cut his villain edit before he finished the sentence. Politicians moved in formation. Same lines. Same hour. All guarding the same invoice. Joe Rogan: “The whole machine turns on you because you were getting in the way of this amazing graft.” Musk: “The goal was to destroy me absolutely.” $200 to $300 billion a year in fraud. A shadow economy the size of a G20 nation, stitched into your paycheck. Then he said the line they will never forgive. Musk: “Probably cut the federal budget in half. And get more done.” Half of what leaves your paycheck was never roads. Never schools. Never a country. It was feeding the thing that lives only as long as you never look. He looked. That is the whole story. Not that he was loud. Not that he was rich. That he was right. Out loud. With the receipts. The death threats were not a warning. They were a confession.

Dustin

100,951 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sen. Josh Hawley BLASTS Keith Ellison for his cover-up of the Somali FRAUD in Minnesota in an interview with Kayleigh McEnany: “This guy ought to be in prison.” Hawley: “I want to see Keith Ellison and Tim Walz both held accountable for what they did here. Tim Walz covered it up, Keith Ellison took kickbacks. You mentioned Feeding Our Future just a second ago. Let's not forget, Keith Ellison had a meeting in his office with the Feeding Our Future fraudsters. They asked him, Kayleigh, to please, please help them get the investigators off their backs. He agreed to help them, and then just a few days later, he took thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. All of this is public, it's been reported. I confronted him about it a couple of months ago under oath. This guy ought to be in prison. Here's the thing that gets me, these guys are celebrated as stars of the Democrat Party. Keith Ellison, rising star. He's a total scam artist. He ought to be in jail.”
1:00

Sen. Josh Hawley BLASTS Keith Ellison for his cover-up of the Somali FRAUD in Minnesota in an interview with Kayleigh McEnany: “This guy ought to be in prison.” Hawley: “I want to see Keith Ellison and Tim Walz both held accountable for what they did here. Tim Walz covered it up, Keith Ellison took kickbacks. You mentioned Feeding Our Future just a second ago. Let's not forget, Keith Ellison had a meeting in his office with the Feeding Our Future fraudsters. They asked him, Kayleigh, to please, please help them get the investigators off their backs. He agreed to help them, and then just a few days later, he took thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. All of this is public, it's been reported. I confronted him about it a couple of months ago under oath. This guy ought to be in prison. Here's the thing that gets me, these guys are celebrated as stars of the Democrat Party. Keith Ellison, rising star. He's a total scam artist. He ought to be in jail.”

Steve Guest

38,156 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison is asking the right question. "If federal authorities are saying they won't even entertain a joint and inclusive investigation, that is deeply disturbing. My question is, what are you afraid of? What are you afraid of an independent investigation for?" Ellison knows the answer and so do Americans. The answer is they are afraid of Americans knowing the truth. An ICE Agent murdered a 37-year-old American citizen, Renee Nicole Good. in broad daylight. And then Trump and Noem lied about it. #DemsUnited
2:31

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison is asking the right question. "If federal authorities are saying they won't even entertain a joint and inclusive investigation, that is deeply disturbing. My question is, what are you afraid of? What are you afraid of an independent investigation for?" Ellison knows the answer and so do Americans. The answer is they are afraid of Americans knowing the truth. An ICE Agent murdered a 37-year-old American citizen, Renee Nicole Good. in broad daylight. And then Trump and Noem lied about it. #DemsUnited

Feisty is proud to be a Democrat!

56,942 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

ELON MUSK: Nobody believed SpaceX could land rockets, until it did. “We really had no idea at the start of SpaceX how to actually make rockets. And obviously, we blew up a rocket three times before finally reaching orbit. It took many attempts from a very talented and dedicated team. And now, we’ve gotten to the point where we take off and land and recover a booster every few days. When we were trying to land the booster, no one really believed that we could succeed. And I was told by so many experts in the aerospace industry that you’re not going to succeed in doing this. And even if you do, no one’s going to buy a rocket that was, you know, a used rocket, essentially. And yeah, it’s amazing to think that we’ve got our 700th flight coming up. So, just a huge testament to the incredible work of the Falcon team and the launch team, manufacturing team.”
4:40

ELON MUSK: Nobody believed SpaceX could land rockets, until it did. “We really had no idea at the start of SpaceX how to actually make rockets. And obviously, we blew up a rocket three times before finally reaching orbit. It took many attempts from a very talented and dedicated team. And now, we’ve gotten to the point where we take off and land and recover a booster every few days. When we were trying to land the booster, no one really believed that we could succeed. And I was told by so many experts in the aerospace industry that you’re not going to succeed in doing this. And even if you do, no one’s going to buy a rocket that was, you know, a used rocket, essentially. And yeah, it’s amazing to think that we’ve got our 700th flight coming up. So, just a huge testament to the incredible work of the Falcon team and the launch team, manufacturing team.”

DogeDesigner

62,440 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Jensen Huang told a room of graduates that nobody has a head start on them. He wasn’t being nice. Huang: “This is the best of times to be in school. This is the best of times to be graduating from school, because the world is reset.” Reset is an engineering word, not a motivational one. It means accumulated state is cleared. The machine restarts from a known position. He chose it on purpose. Huang: “An entire industry, the largest industry in the world, the computer industry, is reset. And because every industry in the world is built onto the computer industry, every industry is reset.” Logistics. Insurance. Farming. Film. All of it runs on computation, which means none of it gets to opt out. When the layer underneath moves, everything standing on it moves. Noticing is optional. Huang: “You are at exactly the same place as everybody else. Nobody has a head start on you.” Somewhere, a fifty-year-old heard the same sentence and did not feel encouraged. Identical fact. Different chair. A reset doesn’t delete what anyone knows. It deletes the premium on having known it first. The knowledge keeps its value. It stops paying interest. Seniority was always a bet that the ground holds still. Every generation before this one had elders to ask. On this, the most experienced person alive has about three years on you. Expertise here can’t be inherited. It gets built, and whoever builds it first becomes the person everyone else asks. Huang: “This is the perfect time to engage the most powerful technology the world’s ever known. It is personalized. Everybody has it on their browser. It is accessible. Obviously everybody’s using it.” Notice what he isn’t describing. No capital requirement. No license. No lab. Every general-purpose technology before this one gated on money or access. Steam needed a factory. Electricity needed a grid. Semiconductors need a fab. This one needs an open tab. The constraint moved somewhere uncomfortable. It used to be access. Now it’s whether you bother. Huang: “And put it to use in service of your career, in service of your dreams, to solve great problems. I can’t imagine how excited you must be, and yet I hear sometimes you’re concerned about the future.” The excited ones and the frightened ones are reading identical information. They differ only in what they do next. Fear is the correct measurement of a reset. It isn’t the correct conclusion. Huang: “I just need you to know that what I see on the other side is a welcoming industry looking for new college grads who are expert at using AI. Whether it’s expert at using AI for marketing or finance or engineering or software engineering, we are looking for expert AI users.” Read the criterion. Not a school. Not a transcript. Not years served. The qualification is a verb, and nobody holds a decade of it. Every advantage anyone has ever held began in a year when nobody had one. Every fortune, every dynasty, every edge you have ever resented traces back to a window like this one, and to the few who moved inside it. Resets expire. Nobody has a head start on you. That is true today. It gets less true every quarter, and by year’s end it will be somebody’s head start. Probably somebody who heard the same sentence you did. Waiting doesn’t feel like a decision. That’s what makes it the most common one. Everyone who ever missed one of these was busy, reasonable, and right about everything except the timing. A level field is not a gift. It’s a countdown.
1:19

Jensen Huang told a room of graduates that nobody has a head start on them. He wasn’t being nice. Huang: “This is the best of times to be in school. This is the best of times to be graduating from school, because the world is reset.” Reset is an engineering word, not a motivational one. It means accumulated state is cleared. The machine restarts from a known position. He chose it on purpose. Huang: “An entire industry, the largest industry in the world, the computer industry, is reset. And because every industry in the world is built onto the computer industry, every industry is reset.” Logistics. Insurance. Farming. Film. All of it runs on computation, which means none of it gets to opt out. When the layer underneath moves, everything standing on it moves. Noticing is optional. Huang: “You are at exactly the same place as everybody else. Nobody has a head start on you.” Somewhere, a fifty-year-old heard the same sentence and did not feel encouraged. Identical fact. Different chair. A reset doesn’t delete what anyone knows. It deletes the premium on having known it first. The knowledge keeps its value. It stops paying interest. Seniority was always a bet that the ground holds still. Every generation before this one had elders to ask. On this, the most experienced person alive has about three years on you. Expertise here can’t be inherited. It gets built, and whoever builds it first becomes the person everyone else asks. Huang: “This is the perfect time to engage the most powerful technology the world’s ever known. It is personalized. Everybody has it on their browser. It is accessible. Obviously everybody’s using it.” Notice what he isn’t describing. No capital requirement. No license. No lab. Every general-purpose technology before this one gated on money or access. Steam needed a factory. Electricity needed a grid. Semiconductors need a fab. This one needs an open tab. The constraint moved somewhere uncomfortable. It used to be access. Now it’s whether you bother. Huang: “And put it to use in service of your career, in service of your dreams, to solve great problems. I can’t imagine how excited you must be, and yet I hear sometimes you’re concerned about the future.” The excited ones and the frightened ones are reading identical information. They differ only in what they do next. Fear is the correct measurement of a reset. It isn’t the correct conclusion. Huang: “I just need you to know that what I see on the other side is a welcoming industry looking for new college grads who are expert at using AI. Whether it’s expert at using AI for marketing or finance or engineering or software engineering, we are looking for expert AI users.” Read the criterion. Not a school. Not a transcript. Not years served. The qualification is a verb, and nobody holds a decade of it. Every advantage anyone has ever held began in a year when nobody had one. Every fortune, every dynasty, every edge you have ever resented traces back to a window like this one, and to the few who moved inside it. Resets expire. Nobody has a head start on you. That is true today. It gets less true every quarter, and by year’s end it will be somebody’s head start. Probably somebody who heard the same sentence you did. Waiting doesn’t feel like a decision. That’s what makes it the most common one. Everyone who ever missed one of these was busy, reasonable, and right about everything except the timing. A level field is not a gift. It’s a countdown.

Dustin

19,113 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Trump was asked, "The Pope has called your immigration actions inhumane. Do you take that seriously?" His answer was, "I mean, maybe he has. He also didn't like the wall, they didn't like the wall. You know, I built a wall. And I didn't put up the wall. I built the wall, the wall, nobody talks about that, you know." HIs answer shows America has a leader who doesn't know how to answer a question anymore. He is not qualified for the job, actually he never was. It is time for Trump to go. Like right now! #DemsUnited
0:28

Trump was asked, "The Pope has called your immigration actions inhumane. Do you take that seriously?" His answer was, "I mean, maybe he has. He also didn't like the wall, they didn't like the wall. You know, I built a wall. And I didn't put up the wall. I built the wall, the wall, nobody talks about that, you know." HIs answer shows America has a leader who doesn't know how to answer a question anymore. He is not qualified for the job, actually he never was. It is time for Trump to go. Like right now! #DemsUnited

Feisty is proud to be a Democrat!

730,874 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Ticket to Heaven is belong to GeminiFourth Jimmy : “I think Gemfot still doesn’t know about this yet. Phi Aof is the kind of person whose mind is always full of ideas, no matter where he is or what he’s doing. Even when he’s just sitting and eating, he’s still thinking a lot. He comes up with ideas like this all the time. For this series, he got the idea when he went to Rome with JimmySea. He visited a church and thought, ‘What if I made a series about kids in a church? That would be great. That’s why he stayed a few more days in Rome to explore and really decide on it. Honestly, I’ve known about this from the very beginning. I heard about it quite a while ago, even though I still didn’t know the title of the series. But since that time in Rome, I already knew it had to be Gemfot who would act in it.” #GeminiFourth #เจมีไนน์โฟร์ท #Gemini_NT #Fourthnattawat #TicketoHeaven
0:55

Ticket to Heaven is belong to GeminiFourth Jimmy : “I think Gemfot still doesn’t know about this yet. Phi Aof is the kind of person whose mind is always full of ideas, no matter where he is or what he’s doing. Even when he’s just sitting and eating, he’s still thinking a lot. He comes up with ideas like this all the time. For this series, he got the idea when he went to Rome with JimmySea. He visited a church and thought, ‘What if I made a series about kids in a church? That would be great. That’s why he stayed a few more days in Rome to explore and really decide on it. Honestly, I’ve known about this from the very beginning. I heard about it quite a while ago, even though I still didn’t know the title of the series. But since that time in Rome, I already knew it had to be Gemfot who would act in it.” #GeminiFourth #เจมีไนน์โฟร์ท #Gemini_NT #Fourthnattawat #TicketoHeaven

🎫

45,558 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Elon Musk described the mechanism that lets millions of intelligent people arrive at the same conclusion without a single independent input between them. Musk: “If your entire exposure is to legacy mainstream media, so that all your information sources are that Trump is basically Hitler, and your friend group has that same information, you have no countervailing opinion.” One source, repeated back by a friend group drawing on that same source, is a single input arriving twelve times. Agreement gets counted as evidence. A belief that has never met resistance feels, from the inside, identical to one that survived it. That is why almost nobody catches it in themselves. Musk: “Then they actually just think Trump is Hitler, even though it’s a little strange he didn’t do Hitler things the last four years.” The comparison had four years of executive power to prove itself and produced nothing. The belief held anyway. Any description of a person that survives the total absence of supporting events was never built on events. Then the same apparatus turned on the man saying it. He spent a decade celebrated as the builder of the electric car company and the rocket company that put American astronauts back in orbit from American soil. The engineering never changed. His politics did, and the coverage inverted inside a single news cycle. Output was never the variable being measured. No conspiracy is required. Outrage outperforms accuracy on every number a newsroom is graded on. Thousands of people chasing one incentive produce coordination nobody had to organize. The arrangement collapsed when the layer between the source and the reader disappeared. The person who was in the room posts it, and the correction comes from someone else who was in the room. It is louder, uglier, and far more honest. Contradiction now arrives whether you invite it or not. Even the owner of the platform gets corrected on his own posts by his own product. For most of the last century a few dozen editors decided what an entire country believed had happened that day. People accepted it as the natural order because no alternative had ever existed to measure it against. Every civilization inherits its picture of reality from whoever controls the distance between an event and the people who hear about it. That distance is now close to zero for the first time in human history. The filter is gone and it cannot be rebuilt. What you believe is finally yours.
0:25

Elon Musk described the mechanism that lets millions of intelligent people arrive at the same conclusion without a single independent input between them. Musk: “If your entire exposure is to legacy mainstream media, so that all your information sources are that Trump is basically Hitler, and your friend group has that same information, you have no countervailing opinion.” One source, repeated back by a friend group drawing on that same source, is a single input arriving twelve times. Agreement gets counted as evidence. A belief that has never met resistance feels, from the inside, identical to one that survived it. That is why almost nobody catches it in themselves. Musk: “Then they actually just think Trump is Hitler, even though it’s a little strange he didn’t do Hitler things the last four years.” The comparison had four years of executive power to prove itself and produced nothing. The belief held anyway. Any description of a person that survives the total absence of supporting events was never built on events. Then the same apparatus turned on the man saying it. He spent a decade celebrated as the builder of the electric car company and the rocket company that put American astronauts back in orbit from American soil. The engineering never changed. His politics did, and the coverage inverted inside a single news cycle. Output was never the variable being measured. No conspiracy is required. Outrage outperforms accuracy on every number a newsroom is graded on. Thousands of people chasing one incentive produce coordination nobody had to organize. The arrangement collapsed when the layer between the source and the reader disappeared. The person who was in the room posts it, and the correction comes from someone else who was in the room. It is louder, uglier, and far more honest. Contradiction now arrives whether you invite it or not. Even the owner of the platform gets corrected on his own posts by his own product. For most of the last century a few dozen editors decided what an entire country believed had happened that day. People accepted it as the natural order because no alternative had ever existed to measure it against. Every civilization inherits its picture of reality from whoever controls the distance between an event and the people who hear about it. That distance is now close to zero for the first time in human history. The filter is gone and it cannot be rebuilt. What you believe is finally yours.

Dustin

885,282 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

i genuinely don't understand why this isn't shown to anyone who has ever said the words "they should just." a nobel laureate sat on live television in 1977 and explained why nobody alive knows enough to fix anything. his name is friedrich hayek. he took the nobel prize in economics three years before this. he wrote the road to serfdom in the middle of the second world war and it has never once been out of print. he was seventy eight when he agreed to do this live, in front of a panel, with one camera and no edit. he gets one question in the first minute. the answer he gives is not a policy, and it is not a number. he is sitting in 1977 describing something that arrives five years later, and he does it without a single hedge. there is one sentence about prices that the whole hour rests on. it takes him about nine seconds and i went back and played it thrice. then he says something about unemployment figures that i don't think any economist would put his name to on camera today. watch buckley's face rather than his. fifty seven minutes, one camera, no edits, no breaks. it went out once in 1977 and i cannot work out why almost nobody has sat through it since.
57:31

i genuinely don't understand why this isn't shown to anyone who has ever said the words "they should just." a nobel laureate sat on live television in 1977 and explained why nobody alive knows enough to fix anything. his name is friedrich hayek. he took the nobel prize in economics three years before this. he wrote the road to serfdom in the middle of the second world war and it has never once been out of print. he was seventy eight when he agreed to do this live, in front of a panel, with one camera and no edit. he gets one question in the first minute. the answer he gives is not a policy, and it is not a number. he is sitting in 1977 describing something that arrives five years later, and he does it without a single hedge. there is one sentence about prices that the whole hour rests on. it takes him about nine seconds and i went back and played it thrice. then he says something about unemployment figures that i don't think any economist would put his name to on camera today. watch buckley's face rather than his. fifty seven minutes, one camera, no edits, no breaks. it went out once in 1977 and i cannot work out why almost nobody has sat through it since.

Zyron

58,332 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce