Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Larry Ellison says Oracle is building nuclear reactors to power "acres" of GPU clusters and it will cost companies $100 billion in the next 3 years to build a frontier AI model and stay in the race

1,017,223 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Tsarathustra's profile picture
Tsarathustra2 years ago

Source:

Ξdo's profile picture
Ξdo2 years ago

How is this guy 80yo?? Even for a gazillionaire loaded to the gills on stem cells no other billionaire looks this good...

sanket patel's profile picture
sanket patel2 years ago

Uncle Larry sounds quite vibrant at 80.

Narasimha R N 🤗 AI - Disciple @69's profile picture
Narasimha R N 🤗 AI - Disciple @692 years ago

Larry’s going nuclear—literally. Sounds like GPUs are the new oil, except more expensive and harder to explain. $100 billion for frontier model? A sci-fi plot!

Engineering Randomness's profile picture
Engineering Randomness2 years ago

I don't think the utility companies are ready for what is about to happen. Companies are going to skip the grid entirely and directly power their own datacenters. Excess power will then be sold back to the grid at a fraction of what the utility could sell it for.

Arctic's profile picture
Arctic2 years ago

Having worked with their tech I can safely say Oracle is the last company I want to run a nuclear reactor.

DAS's profile picture
DAS2 years ago

just 25 million of lines of code...that powers half the worlds shit — 

Bhavya Jain's profile picture
Bhavya Jain2 years ago

Soon amount of energy required to train GPUs will be more than what is required by all the humans combined.

Sampson Ovuoba's profile picture
Sampson Ovuoba2 years ago

$100 billion seems highly exaggerated, especially given the rise of smaller models like 4o mini which cost less to train due to using fewer parameters and yet still deliver performance comparable to larger models. Sure this smaller models rely more on inference, which can add to operational costs, they are already generating revenue through subscriptions to offset these costs. So the $100 billion claim needed just to get started seems like a huge overestimate imo

Tim Burton's profile picture
Tim Burton2 years ago

I forgot how much he looks like a Bond villain

Related Videos

Larry Ellison borrowed $125 billion to bet everything on a single customer that LOSES $5 billion a year. American banks are already refusing to lend him another dollar. And now that single customer has started to slowly walk away. This is one of the biggest gambles in tech history - and it’s NOT looking good: Oracle has $124.7 billion in debt on its books right now. That's more than the GDP of 100+ countries. Their free cash flow over the last 12 months? Negative $13.18 billion. They are spending more money than they make. And they're doing it on PURPOSE. Every other hyperscaler funds their AI buildout with cash. Google has cash. Amazon has cash. Microsoft has cash. Oracle has IOUs. They raised $58 billion in debt in just two months. $38 billion for Texas and Wisconsin data centers. $20 billion for New Mexico. And they need another $100 billion on top of that. Even US banks are starting to say no. TD Cowen reported that multiple banks have pulled back from Oracle lending. Borrowing costs have roughly DOUBLED since September. They're now paying interest rates typically reserved for companies rated below investment grade. Barclays downgraded their debt to underweight and warned Oracle could run out of cash by November 2026. So what does Larry Ellison do? He FIRES 30,000 people. Oracle is planning layoffs affecting up to 18% of its entire workforce. The goal is to free up $8 to $10 billion in cash flow just to keep the lights on while they build data centers for ONE customer: OpenAI. Oracle's $553 billion backlog sounds incredible until you realize a massive chunk of it flows through a single relationship. If OpenAI sneezes, Oracle catches pneumonia. And OpenAI is already sneezing... Sam Altman DROPPED plans to expand the Stargate site in Abilene, Texas. And the reason is insane: Nvidia's chips are improving so fast that by the time Oracle finishes building the data center, the processors inside it will already be outdated. Oracle is building with Blackwell chips. But Nvidia's new Vera Rubin platform delivers 5x the inference performance at 10x lower cost per token. So Oracle is borrowing billions to build facilities that will house yesterday's technology before they even open. The world of bits moves faster than the world of atoms. And Oracle is trapped in between. But here's where it gets wild: The earnings call revealed something most people missed... Oracle now REQUIRES certain customers to buy their own GPUs upfront and hand them over. They call it the "bring your own chips" model. Translation: Oracle can't afford the hardware anymore. So they're asking customers to fund the construction of Oracle's OWN data centers. The stock is still down 23% this year even after the 12% earnings pop. Moody's rates Oracle just two notches above junk status. Lower than Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft. And they have $248 billion in ADDITIONAL lease obligations that aren't even on the balance sheet yet. Larry Ellison is 81 years old and making the biggest bet in corporate history. He's trying to turn a legacy database company into a hyperscale AI cloud provider using other people's money. All while his only major customer is a startup that burns $5 billion a year and just had its expansion partner refuse to fund the next campus. The earnings beat was real. Revenue up 22%. Cloud infrastructure up 84%. But revenue growth funded by debt isn't growth. It's leverage. And leverage works both ways. If OpenAI stays loyal, if the Stargate buildout continues, if the debt markets keep lending, if Vera Rubin doesn't make their entire infrastructure obsolete overnight, then Larry Ellison pulled off the greatest corporate reinvention in history. But that's a lot of ifs for a company two notches above junk. Oracle is either the most undervalued AI play on the market or the most overleveraged house of cards since 2008. The next six months will tell us which one.

Ricardo

181,554 views • 6 months ago