Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨🇺🇸LASER WEED KILLER Carbon Robotics made an autonomous LaserWeeder system that kills 100,000 weeds per hour. Because it uses thermal energy to eradicate weeds, rather than a physical intervention like tilling, the machine doesn't disturb the soil below. That means reduced farm costs, no more herbicides, and, most importantly,... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,925,933 subscribers

1,236,219 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Christine Bella

Christine Bellavor 1 Jahr

Awesome! But have they done any investigation into any impact the lasers/scanners might have on the cellular development of the crops? I’m all for ditching poisonous chemicals for robotics — as long as we’re not exchanging one danger for another.

Profilbild von Zachary Kramer

Zachary Kramervor 1 Jahr

And would you look at that. Their CTO is a highly skilled Russian native educated in Moscow. Yet he brought his skills and creative abilities to the United states to make America great! With this technology America will be competing at the highest level in agriculture.

Profilbild von 🔥 CEO Branding Expert

🔥 CEO Branding Expertvor 1 Jahr

Can I get a micro version of that in the spring please?

Profilbild von David Lind

David Lindvor 1 Jahr

Weed Killer Robot

Profilbild von TooFuginBad

TooFuginBadvor 1 Jahr

That is amazing. Where are all the farm hands screaming “took our jerbs” 😂

Profilbild von Otter

Ottervor 1 Jahr

We know how lasers can burn things. In this case it would be interesting to know how the system identifies what needs to be burned vs saved.

Profilbild von JasetheAce

JasetheAcevor 1 Jahr

Where have i seen this before? This can only lead to one thing.....

Profilbild von Rhonda Willock

Rhonda Willockvor 1 Jahr

Can we please have one of these in a residential size for yards!? Wow!!!

Profilbild von Michael Simmons 🚀

Michael Simmons 🚀vor 1 Jahr

Someday the drones will be able to do that to independent thinkers.

Profilbild von Jason Griffin

Jason Griffinvor 1 Jahr

Carbon Robotics' LaserWeeder uses AI, computer vision, and lasers to identify and eliminate weeds. High-resolution cameras capture images of the field, and an onboard supercomputer identifies weeds among crops. Lasers then target the weeds' meristems with thermal energy, killing them without disturbing the soil or using chemicals. This system can kill up to 200,000 weeds per hour, offering an eco-friendly alternative to traditional weeding methods. It's effective across over 100 types of crops, including onions, carrots, and leafy greens. The technology not only reduces weed management costs by up to 80% but also increases crop yield and quality by minimizing herbicide use.

Ähnliche Videos

Starlink Enables Carbon Robotics to Bring Physical AI to Farms Around the World By providing reliable global connectivity, Starlink has dramatically accelerated Carbon Robotics' AI development and delivered powerful results for farmers. Farmers using Carbon Robotics’ LaserWeeder solutions, including this 119-year-old Colorado family farm, have achieved up to a 30% increase in crop yields per acre, while reducing weeding costs by more than 80%. “Over the years, we’ve been able to minimize our costs on hand weeding and controlling weeds. With the help of Carbon Robotics and the LaserWeeder, we’ve taken our costs down from over $1 million to maybe $100,000 to $200,000 at most.” - Jordan Hungenberg, Owner, Hungenberg Produce

Starlink Enables Carbon Robotics to Bring Physical AI to Farms Around the World By providing reliable global connectivity, Starlink has dramatically accelerated Carbon Robotics' AI development and delivered powerful results for farmers. Farmers using Carbon Robotics’ LaserWeeder solutions, including this 119-year-old Colorado family farm, have achieved up to a 30% increase in crop yields per acre, while reducing weeding costs by more than 80%. “Over the years, we’ve been able to minimize our costs on hand weeding and controlling weeds. With the help of Carbon Robotics and the LaserWeeder, we’ve taken our costs down from over $1 million to maybe $100,000 to $200,000 at most.” - Jordan Hungenberg, Owner, Hungenberg Produce

Carbon Robotics

10,114 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$The future of farming is autonomous and chemical-free! 🌱 cropr deployed a laser weeding robot working autonomously in chicory fields. AI system identifies weeds from crops. A laser heats the growing point in a fraction of a second. Weed stops growing. No herbicides. No chemicals in the soil. This solves a real problem. Weeds steal water, nutrients, and light. Herbicide resistance is growing. Farmers need alternatives that actually work. The robot learns from every pass. Each field deployment generates data. Each mission improves the next one. The technology already transfers across crops, chicory, carrots, onions coming soon. Better yields. Cleaner fields. Zero chemical residue. That's the future of weed management. 🥕 More info here: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →$

The future of farming is autonomous and chemical-free! 🌱 cropr deployed a laser weeding robot working autonomously in chicory fields. AI system identifies weeds from crops. A laser heats the growing point in a fraction of a second. Weed stops growing. No herbicides. No chemicals in the soil. This solves a real problem. Weeds steal water, nutrients, and light. Herbicide resistance is growing. Farmers need alternatives that actually work. The robot learns from every pass. Each field deployment generates data. Each mission improves the next one. The technology already transfers across crops, chicory, carrots, onions coming soon. Better yields. Cleaner fields. Zero chemical residue. That's the future of weed management. 🥕 More info here: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

39,443 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A team of undergraduates from Cornell CALS and Cornell Duffield College of Engineering beat out 95 other teams to take the grand prize at The Farm Robotics Challenge with their invention: an autonomous robot that kills weeds with electricity. Their robot can travel through a vineyard or orchard without a human operator, zapping weeds with a small amount of electricity, saving labor and energy, and preventing crop loss, without the use of herbicides. Read more:

A team of undergraduates from Cornell CALS and Cornell Duffield College of Engineering beat out 95 other teams to take the grand prize at The Farm Robotics Challenge with their invention: an autonomous robot that kills weeds with electricity. Their robot can travel through a vineyard or orchard without a human operator, zapping weeds with a small amount of electricity, saving labor and energy, and preventing crop loss, without the use of herbicides. Read more:

Cornell University

27,506 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rutgers University scientist Thierry Besançon just proved lasers can zap weeds as effectively as herbicides—without a single chemical! In the first peer-reviewed East Coast trials (published June 2025 in Pest Management Science), Carbon Robotics' AI-guided LaserWeeder matched (or beat) conventional herbicides on spinach, peas, and beets. Key wins: - Pinpoint precision — zaps weeds 0.5 cm from crop seedlings with zero damage to the crop - Up to 97% weed biomass reduction in tests Better crop growth in some cases - No herbicides = safer for workers, consumers, environment, and sidesteps resistant superweeds like Palmer amaranth Besançon: "It’s pure physics. Just light energy targeting the weeds." Farmers with specialty crops (few herbicide options) are already interested. Challenges: High cost (~$500K+), needs multiple passes, works best on small weeds—but tech is evolving fast (faster models coming). This could revolutionize sustainable farming on the East Coast and beyond. No more "Roundup-ready" dependency? What do you think—laser weeders the future, or too expensive/practical yet? (From Rutgers/Cornell 2025 study + recent reports—game-changing ag tech!)

Rutgers University scientist Thierry Besançon just proved lasers can zap weeds as effectively as herbicides—without a single chemical! In the first peer-reviewed East Coast trials (published June 2025 in Pest Management Science), Carbon Robotics' AI-guided LaserWeeder matched (or beat) conventional herbicides on spinach, peas, and beets. Key wins: - Pinpoint precision — zaps weeds 0.5 cm from crop seedlings with zero damage to the crop - Up to 97% weed biomass reduction in tests Better crop growth in some cases - No herbicides = safer for workers, consumers, environment, and sidesteps resistant superweeds like Palmer amaranth Besançon: "It’s pure physics. Just light energy targeting the weeds." Farmers with specialty crops (few herbicide options) are already interested. Challenges: High cost (~$500K+), needs multiple passes, works best on small weeds—but tech is evolving fast (faster models coming). This could revolutionize sustainable farming on the East Coast and beyond. No more "Roundup-ready" dependency? What do you think—laser weeders the future, or too expensive/practical yet? (From Rutgers/Cornell 2025 study + recent reports—game-changing ag tech!)

Camus

40,789 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Build robots for a better future! 🚜 The farm-ng Amiga is more than just a farm robot — it’s an open-source development platform for agricultural innovation. Developers can easily build on top of its modular design, and developer-friendly SDK. Let's review other projects that were based on the Amiga robot! → At the Alcorn State University researchers developed a robot that uses UVC light to kill crops, pests, and diseases instead of chemical pesticides. It moves through crop rows using GPS and sensors to apply light precisely without harming plants. Such a cool one! → Another great project at Carnegie Mellon University, where they have developed a robot that plants trees automatically using a three-step process—digging, placing seedlings, and tamping the soil. It uses AI and sensors to navigate and ensure successful planting. → Last but not least, at Penn State University they created a weed-removing robot. This robot detects and removes weeds in high-tunnel farms. It uses cameras to map weed locations and applies precise herbicide amounts. This reduces chemical use, and labor, and improves crop management. As you can see, potential applications in agriculture are plentiful. I encourage you - let's build robots for better and more sustainable farms! Developers unite and build together!

Build robots for a better future! 🚜 The farm-ng Amiga is more than just a farm robot — it’s an open-source development platform for agricultural innovation. Developers can easily build on top of its modular design, and developer-friendly SDK. Let's review other projects that were based on the Amiga robot! → At the Alcorn State University researchers developed a robot that uses UVC light to kill crops, pests, and diseases instead of chemical pesticides. It moves through crop rows using GPS and sensors to apply light precisely without harming plants. Such a cool one! → Another great project at Carnegie Mellon University, where they have developed a robot that plants trees automatically using a three-step process—digging, placing seedlings, and tamping the soil. It uses AI and sensors to navigate and ensure successful planting. → Last but not least, at Penn State University they created a weed-removing robot. This robot detects and removes weeds in high-tunnel farms. It uses cameras to map weed locations and applies precise herbicide amounts. This reduces chemical use, and labor, and improves crop management. As you can see, potential applications in agriculture are plentiful. I encourage you - let's build robots for better and more sustainable farms! Developers unite and build together!

Lukas Ziegler

43,325 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RFK Jr. says Cheerios contain more glyphosate per serving than the vitamin D added to enrich the cereal. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup, the most widely used weed killer on Earth. It is sprayed on 70 different food crops including corn, soy, canola, and wheat. If you eat a slice of bread, a bowl of cereal, a plate of pasta, a slice of pizza, or chicken nuggets, there is a good chance one or more of those ingredients was doused in Roundup before it left the farm. RFK Jr. says glyphosate destroys the gut microbiome by attacking the shikimate pathway, which is how the microbiome communicates with itself. Monsanto claimed glyphosate was safe because it does not interfere with any human organ. That claim was made before we understood the microbiome was an organ. Your cereal has more weed killer than vitamins. — Robert F. Kennedy (Robert F. Kennedy Jr) on Mark Hyman's Podcast (Mark Hyman, M.D.)

RFK Jr. says Cheerios contain more glyphosate per serving than the vitamin D added to enrich the cereal. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup, the most widely used weed killer on Earth. It is sprayed on 70 different food crops including corn, soy, canola, and wheat. If you eat a slice of bread, a bowl of cereal, a plate of pasta, a slice of pizza, or chicken nuggets, there is a good chance one or more of those ingredients was doused in Roundup before it left the farm. RFK Jr. says glyphosate destroys the gut microbiome by attacking the shikimate pathway, which is how the microbiome communicates with itself. Monsanto claimed glyphosate was safe because it does not interfere with any human organ. That claim was made before we understood the microbiome was an organ. Your cereal has more weed killer than vitamins. — Robert F. Kennedy (Robert F. Kennedy Jr) on Mark Hyman's Podcast (Mark Hyman, M.D.)

Goku

81,426 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

2026 Conservative Claire Coutinho claims the UK's pursuit of Net Zero is driven by ideology, and that using less wind and solar could save the equivalent of around £500 per household a year 2023: Conservative Claire Coutinho, "Nothing will distract us from achieving Net Zero or driving forward with renewables" The claim that less wind and solar would save every household £500 a year is deeply misleading. Coutinho is effectively taking the result of a model that changes almost the entire future electricity system—less wind and solar, much more nuclear and gas, different grid requirements and, crucially, no carbon price—and presenting the resulting £500-plus difference as though it were the cost of renewables. The research simply doesn't establish that. The figure does not come from evidence that renewables currently add £500 to household bills. It comes from a Conservative-backed modelling exercise comparing two hypothetical energy systems and turning £320 billion of estimated economy-wide savings between 2030 and 2050 into an annual equivalent per household. Crucially, the supposedly cheaper alternative doesn't simply build less wind and solar. It assumes far more nuclear power, substantially more unabated gas, lower spending on networks and balancing, and the removal of carbon pricing from electricity generation. Of the £320 billion headline saving, £137bn comes from assumed lower network costs, £67bn from balancing and ancillary services, £22bn from subsidies and capacity costs, and £94bn from lower wholesale prices. That £94 billion is particularly important because much of that supposed saving is created by changing the rules of the comparison. The existing-policy scenario assumes generators continue paying a carbon price which rises substantially towards 2050; the alternative effectively abolishes that carbon price from 2031. Unsurprisingly, a model in which gas-fired electricity no longer carries that cost produces cheaper wholesale electricity. But that isn't evidence that wind and solar made electricity £94bn more expensive. It is principally the consequence of assuming a major carbon-pricing policy is abolished. Nor is removing carbon pricing simply £94bn of free money. Carbon pricing is deliberately intended to make polluters account for their emissions, discourage fossil-fuel generation and encourage cleaner alternatives, while carbon allowances also generate government revenue. Removing it means accepting considerably greater emissions and losing those revenues and incentives. The alternative model consequently produces hundreds of millions of tonnes of additional CO₂. The model also assumes Britain can successfully build around 20GW of nuclear capacity, while retaining much greater dependence on gas. Whether nuclear can be delivered at the assumed cost and timetable is far from guaranteed, while greater reliance on gas leaves households more vulnerable to international gas-price shocks—the same exposure that played such a large role in Britain's recent energy-price crisis. There is a legitimate argument about the costs associated with large amounts of wind and solar. An electricity system dependent on intermittent generation requires substantial investment in transmission, balancing, storage, interconnectors and backup capacity, and those costs shouldn't be ignored. But that is very different from demonstrating that wind and solar cost every household £500 a year. Nearly £100bn of the supposed saving comes from the decision to remove carbon pricing, not from discovering that wind and solar are £100bn more expensive. Coutinho has taken a £500-plus headline generated by a Conservative-backed model containing a whole package of assumptions—less wind and solar, much more nuclear, more gas, less grid investment and the abolition of carbon pricing—and presented it to the public as evidence that Britain's reliance on wind and solar is costing households hundreds of pounds. That's misleading because the model doesn't establish that. It establishes that, if you change the entire future energy system and the taxes imposed upon it, its authors calculate a lower overall system cost. Turning that into “less wind and solar will save your household £500” strips away the assumptions that actually produce the number.

2026 Conservative Claire Coutinho claims the UK's pursuit of Net Zero is driven by ideology, and that using less wind and solar could save the equivalent of around £500 per household a year 2023: Conservative Claire Coutinho, "Nothing will distract us from achieving Net Zero or driving forward with renewables" The claim that less wind and solar would save every household £500 a year is deeply misleading. Coutinho is effectively taking the result of a model that changes almost the entire future electricity system—less wind and solar, much more nuclear and gas, different grid requirements and, crucially, no carbon price—and presenting the resulting £500-plus difference as though it were the cost of renewables. The research simply doesn't establish that. The figure does not come from evidence that renewables currently add £500 to household bills. It comes from a Conservative-backed modelling exercise comparing two hypothetical energy systems and turning £320 billion of estimated economy-wide savings between 2030 and 2050 into an annual equivalent per household. Crucially, the supposedly cheaper alternative doesn't simply build less wind and solar. It assumes far more nuclear power, substantially more unabated gas, lower spending on networks and balancing, and the removal of carbon pricing from electricity generation. Of the £320 billion headline saving, £137bn comes from assumed lower network costs, £67bn from balancing and ancillary services, £22bn from subsidies and capacity costs, and £94bn from lower wholesale prices. That £94 billion is particularly important because much of that supposed saving is created by changing the rules of the comparison. The existing-policy scenario assumes generators continue paying a carbon price which rises substantially towards 2050; the alternative effectively abolishes that carbon price from 2031. Unsurprisingly, a model in which gas-fired electricity no longer carries that cost produces cheaper wholesale electricity. But that isn't evidence that wind and solar made electricity £94bn more expensive. It is principally the consequence of assuming a major carbon-pricing policy is abolished. Nor is removing carbon pricing simply £94bn of free money. Carbon pricing is deliberately intended to make polluters account for their emissions, discourage fossil-fuel generation and encourage cleaner alternatives, while carbon allowances also generate government revenue. Removing it means accepting considerably greater emissions and losing those revenues and incentives. The alternative model consequently produces hundreds of millions of tonnes of additional CO₂. The model also assumes Britain can successfully build around 20GW of nuclear capacity, while retaining much greater dependence on gas. Whether nuclear can be delivered at the assumed cost and timetable is far from guaranteed, while greater reliance on gas leaves households more vulnerable to international gas-price shocks—the same exposure that played such a large role in Britain's recent energy-price crisis. There is a legitimate argument about the costs associated with large amounts of wind and solar. An electricity system dependent on intermittent generation requires substantial investment in transmission, balancing, storage, interconnectors and backup capacity, and those costs shouldn't be ignored. But that is very different from demonstrating that wind and solar cost every household £500 a year. Nearly £100bn of the supposed saving comes from the decision to remove carbon pricing, not from discovering that wind and solar are £100bn more expensive. Coutinho has taken a £500-plus headline generated by a Conservative-backed model containing a whole package of assumptions—less wind and solar, much more nuclear, more gas, less grid investment and the abolition of carbon pricing—and presented it to the public as evidence that Britain's reliance on wind and solar is costing households hundreds of pounds. That's misleading because the model doesn't establish that. It establishes that, if you change the entire future energy system and the taxes imposed upon it, its authors calculate a lower overall system cost. Turning that into “less wind and solar will save your household £500” strips away the assumptions that actually produce the number.

Farrukh

14,159 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

China has developed a 3-kg bionic robotic fish designed to move underwater more naturally and quietly than conventional underwater drones. Its body uses seven sections and three movable tail joints to mimic the movement of a real fish. The robot can reportedly operate autonomously for around 5 hours on a charge and carries a front-mounted sonar system for monitoring its underwater surroundings. But its most interesting feature may be its appearance—it is designed to resemble an ordinary fish, potentially making it harder to notice. That could give biomimetic robots an interesting role in underwater reconnaissance and surveillance. The idea is simple: instead of building a machine that looks like a machine, build one that looks like part of the environment—and let it quietly observe what is happening underwater. #China #robot #robotics #chinarobot #underwaterworld

China has developed a 3-kg bionic robotic fish designed to move underwater more naturally and quietly than conventional underwater drones. Its body uses seven sections and three movable tail joints to mimic the movement of a real fish. The robot can reportedly operate autonomously for around 5 hours on a charge and carries a front-mounted sonar system for monitoring its underwater surroundings. But its most interesting feature may be its appearance—it is designed to resemble an ordinary fish, potentially making it harder to notice. That could give biomimetic robots an interesting role in underwater reconnaissance and surveillance. The idea is simple: instead of building a machine that looks like a machine, build one that looks like part of the environment—and let it quietly observe what is happening underwater. #China #robot #robotics #chinarobot #underwaterworld

Srijan Pal Singh

101,038 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

"bUt wHo iS gOIng to pICk tHe cROps"? Want to eat food that hasn't been endlessly doused in chemicals, but which also isn't super expensive? Think there might be an alternative to allowing millions of illegals into the country to harvest the crops? "Precision Agriculture" is finally here, and can deliver that, driving down the cost of groceries without the old inputs of factory farming Imagine a world where agricultural scale doesn't mean vast reservoirs of chemicals getting constantly dumped over the food supply, but high-tech, precision equipment doing what the chemical inputs used to The coolest example is the weeder that zaps and burns thousands of weeds a minute, up to 80 a second, saving farmers money and obviating RoundUp, or other chemicals like it. The combination of AI, precision machinery, and agricultural advancement can make that happen, the world it could create is a really exciting one What makes it all the more so is that these innovations aren't just cool. They're real leaps forward that will help Americans. They'll lower the cost of groceries, help farmers avoid huge input bills, such as for the herbicides obviated by the laser weeder, and create a thriving domestic manufacturing sector built around the production of this precision machinery, and all the advances that go into creating it. The pairing of technology and manufacturing in a really cool way that we haven't really seen outside of the military-industrial complex for decades.That's finally possible again, and Precision Agriculture looks like it can make it so

"bUt wHo iS gOIng to pICk tHe cROps"? Want to eat food that hasn't been endlessly doused in chemicals, but which also isn't super expensive? Think there might be an alternative to allowing millions of illegals into the country to harvest the crops? "Precision Agriculture" is finally here, and can deliver that, driving down the cost of groceries without the old inputs of factory farming Imagine a world where agricultural scale doesn't mean vast reservoirs of chemicals getting constantly dumped over the food supply, but high-tech, precision equipment doing what the chemical inputs used to The coolest example is the weeder that zaps and burns thousands of weeds a minute, up to 80 a second, saving farmers money and obviating RoundUp, or other chemicals like it. The combination of AI, precision machinery, and agricultural advancement can make that happen, the world it could create is a really exciting one What makes it all the more so is that these innovations aren't just cool. They're real leaps forward that will help Americans. They'll lower the cost of groceries, help farmers avoid huge input bills, such as for the herbicides obviated by the laser weeder, and create a thriving domestic manufacturing sector built around the production of this precision machinery, and all the advances that go into creating it. The pairing of technology and manufacturing in a really cool way that we haven't really seen outside of the military-industrial complex for decades.That's finally possible again, and Precision Agriculture looks like it can make it so

Jason Robertson

39,618 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇺🇸 HUGE WIN FOR MAHA: FEDS POUR $700M INTO FARMING PLAN TO FIX AMERICA’S SOIL AND FOOD SYSTEM For years, farming help came in confusing chunks and paperwork nightmares. No one knew who to call, what to fix, or how to get paid for doing it right. Now that’s over. Sec. Rollins just launched a $700 million pilot to overhaul how farmers grow food by healing the land, not beating it to death. It’s called Regenerative Agriculture, and it’s about boosting soil life, stopping erosion, and growing real food without wrecking the planet. Farmers won’t need 10 forms and 6 offices anymore. One application, one plan, whole farm help. That means cleaner water, stronger crops, and fewer gimmicks from Big Ag. MAHA’s vision is simple: healthier land, better food, fewer sick Americans. Source: Rapid Response 47, Secretary Brooke Rollins

🇺🇸 HUGE WIN FOR MAHA: FEDS POUR $700M INTO FARMING PLAN TO FIX AMERICA’S SOIL AND FOOD SYSTEM For years, farming help came in confusing chunks and paperwork nightmares. No one knew who to call, what to fix, or how to get paid for doing it right. Now that’s over. Sec. Rollins just launched a $700 million pilot to overhaul how farmers grow food by healing the land, not beating it to death. It’s called Regenerative Agriculture, and it’s about boosting soil life, stopping erosion, and growing real food without wrecking the planet. Farmers won’t need 10 forms and 6 offices anymore. One application, one plan, whole farm help. That means cleaner water, stronger crops, and fewer gimmicks from Big Ag. MAHA’s vision is simple: healthier land, better food, fewer sick Americans. Source: Rapid Response 47, Secretary Brooke Rollins

Mario Nawfal

36,457 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: The Trump administration is finally admitting the price tag of ICE and deportations… but not the cause. “It costs $18,225 per deportation.” Multiply that by millions… yeah, it is staggering. But, here’s what they aren’t saying… It’s expensive because they made it that way. They underfund the courts, fired a hundred+ of immigration judges… then complain the courts are “clogged.” They restrict legal pathways… then blame asylum seekers for using the only ones left. They drag cases out for years… then act shocked when attorneys are involved. And they’re locking people in detention facilities when they don’t need to be… adding thousands in costs per person… Because those facilities are run by private contractors… getting paid per bed, per day. So, the longer people are detained… the more money gets made, and the more it costs per deportation. But now, suddenly it’s the system’s fault? No… it’s the design. Break the system… bottleneck it… monetize the suffering… Then point to the price tag and say, “Look how broken this is.” They created the cost. Now they’re using it as an excuse to remove due process.

🚨BREAKING: The Trump administration is finally admitting the price tag of ICE and deportations… but not the cause. “It costs $18,225 per deportation.” Multiply that by millions… yeah, it is staggering. But, here’s what they aren’t saying… It’s expensive because they made it that way. They underfund the courts, fired a hundred+ of immigration judges… then complain the courts are “clogged.” They restrict legal pathways… then blame asylum seekers for using the only ones left. They drag cases out for years… then act shocked when attorneys are involved. And they’re locking people in detention facilities when they don’t need to be… adding thousands in costs per person… Because those facilities are run by private contractors… getting paid per bed, per day. So, the longer people are detained… the more money gets made, and the more it costs per deportation. But now, suddenly it’s the system’s fault? No… it’s the design. Break the system… bottleneck it… monetize the suffering… Then point to the price tag and say, “Look how broken this is.” They created the cost. Now they’re using it as an excuse to remove due process.

Jesus Freakin Congress

246,947 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

1. This is Elon Musk presenting what the future of cars, referred to as Cybercabs, will look like in less than two years. He presented this at the “We, Robot” event, where he introduced autonomous vehicles and robots. The unfortunate reality is that, on the same day when the world’s richest man, known for his work in technology, was presenting this, Zimbabwe’s ambassador to Europe and the Americas, and President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s advisor, made the most embarrassing, outrageous, and foolish remarks about Elon Musk and his companies. See Twitter 2 below. He called this anti-Christ and the work of the devil. Africa is cursed for sure with such idiots in power, how can it develop? These vehicles, like Tesla’s Model Y and Cybercab, aim to reduce travel costs, maximise vehicle usage, and enhance convenience. Musk compared autonomous transport to past innovations like elevators and said that autonomous cars are becoming safer and more efficient than human driving. Musk envisions cities with fewer parking lots, replaced by parks, thanks to reduced car ownership needs. Autonomous vehicles are expected to roll out fully by 2026. Robovans, designed for high-density travel and goods transport, were also introduced. The event showcased these technologies, promising an exciting future of autonomy and robotics.

1. This is Elon Musk presenting what the future of cars, referred to as Cybercabs, will look like in less than two years. He presented this at the “We, Robot” event, where he introduced autonomous vehicles and robots. The unfortunate reality is that, on the same day when the world’s richest man, known for his work in technology, was presenting this, Zimbabwe’s ambassador to Europe and the Americas, and President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s advisor, made the most embarrassing, outrageous, and foolish remarks about Elon Musk and his companies. See Twitter 2 below. He called this anti-Christ and the work of the devil. Africa is cursed for sure with such idiots in power, how can it develop? These vehicles, like Tesla’s Model Y and Cybercab, aim to reduce travel costs, maximise vehicle usage, and enhance convenience. Musk compared autonomous transport to past innovations like elevators and said that autonomous cars are becoming safer and more efficient than human driving. Musk envisions cities with fewer parking lots, replaced by parks, thanks to reduced car ownership needs. Autonomous vehicles are expected to roll out fully by 2026. Robovans, designed for high-density travel and goods transport, were also introduced. The event showcased these technologies, promising an exciting future of autonomy and robotics.

Hopewell Chin’ono

46,743 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Most people are doing yard work wrong, and it’s costing extra time and money. Ever wonder why weed wacker string seems to snap every two seconds, forcing a pause to constantly bump the head or re-spool the line? It turns out there is a legitimate science to maintaining trimmer line, and a simple 24-hour trick completely changes the game. Most trimmer lines are made of nylon, a material known for being hydrophilic. This means it actively absorbs moisture. Over time, sitting in a hot garage or a dry tool shed causes the plastic to lose its moisture content, becoming brittle and prone to snapping on impact. Immersing a new spool of weed wacker wire in a bucket of water for 24 hours before winding it into the trimmer replenishes that lost moisture. This makes the plastic significantly more pliable, durable, and resilient against tough weeds and chain-link fences. To make the line last even longer and get the yard done faster, keep these strategies in mind: Store Spools in a Cool Place: Never leave spare trimmer line in direct sunlight or the trunk of a car. UV rays and intense heat degrade nylon quickly. Storing the spool in a sealed bag with a damp paper towel helps maintain peak flexibility. Let the Tips Do the Work: The most common mistake is crowding the weeds. The highest cutting power is at the very tip of the string. Pushing the trimmer head directly into thick brush or hard surfaces causes friction heat, which binds the line together inside the spool and leads to premature snaps. Choose the Right Shape: Round line is durable but tears grass rather than cutting it cleanly. Square or twisted lines have sharp edges that slice through heavy weeds effortlessly, reducing the strain on both the engine and the line itself. Taking care of the tools makes the work easier. Try soaking the next spool of line and notice how much longer it lasts.

Most people are doing yard work wrong, and it’s costing extra time and money. Ever wonder why weed wacker string seems to snap every two seconds, forcing a pause to constantly bump the head or re-spool the line? It turns out there is a legitimate science to maintaining trimmer line, and a simple 24-hour trick completely changes the game. Most trimmer lines are made of nylon, a material known for being hydrophilic. This means it actively absorbs moisture. Over time, sitting in a hot garage or a dry tool shed causes the plastic to lose its moisture content, becoming brittle and prone to snapping on impact. Immersing a new spool of weed wacker wire in a bucket of water for 24 hours before winding it into the trimmer replenishes that lost moisture. This makes the plastic significantly more pliable, durable, and resilient against tough weeds and chain-link fences. To make the line last even longer and get the yard done faster, keep these strategies in mind: Store Spools in a Cool Place: Never leave spare trimmer line in direct sunlight or the trunk of a car. UV rays and intense heat degrade nylon quickly. Storing the spool in a sealed bag with a damp paper towel helps maintain peak flexibility. Let the Tips Do the Work: The most common mistake is crowding the weeds. The highest cutting power is at the very tip of the string. Pushing the trimmer head directly into thick brush or hard surfaces causes friction heat, which binds the line together inside the spool and leads to premature snaps. Choose the Right Shape: Round line is durable but tears grass rather than cutting it cleanly. Square or twisted lines have sharp edges that slice through heavy weeds effortlessly, reducing the strain on both the engine and the line itself. Taking care of the tools makes the work easier. Try soaking the next spool of line and notice how much longer it lasts.

PeachProof

323,312 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Something I learned when I was 10 years old. People will pay twice as much for sweet 🌽 and you could sell twice as much if you were 1st to the market. Something that drives my nuts is that farmers and universities fail to study Slope Curve. We grow Annuals. They live They die I think it’s funny how the no till / cover crop farmers seem like they go to the church of Glypho Saint The organic guys make their hay preaching how it’s poison The conventional guys need a 7 way stack of chemicals that thunder kills waterhemp from dysfunctional soil This system uses wheat control to create a more even distribution of water across the field… and never grow weeds to begin with. I’m not here to piss off everyone. I just don’t understand why we have to look at every “crop” like 1 crop is going to pay handsomely and cover all our overhead costs and leave money in the bank. Maybe we could use cash crops like cover crops… except we don’t kill them We let them live We let them die We just do the math backwards and find how we can grab the ancillary benefits of their existence to our advantage We get more bushels per seed and unit of Nitrogen We stack entities based on slope curve. It starts with messing with the variables and challenging yourself to think differently Instead of just doing what the salesman or the tribe or the university says is the bmp Maybe they just want to continue status quo because your loyalty and lack of seeking truths are their profit center

Something I learned when I was 10 years old. People will pay twice as much for sweet 🌽 and you could sell twice as much if you were 1st to the market. Something that drives my nuts is that farmers and universities fail to study Slope Curve. We grow Annuals. They live They die I think it’s funny how the no till / cover crop farmers seem like they go to the church of Glypho Saint The organic guys make their hay preaching how it’s poison The conventional guys need a 7 way stack of chemicals that thunder kills waterhemp from dysfunctional soil This system uses wheat control to create a more even distribution of water across the field… and never grow weeds to begin with. I’m not here to piss off everyone. I just don’t understand why we have to look at every “crop” like 1 crop is going to pay handsomely and cover all our overhead costs and leave money in the bank. Maybe we could use cash crops like cover crops… except we don’t kill them We let them live We let them die We just do the math backwards and find how we can grab the ancillary benefits of their existence to our advantage We get more bushels per seed and unit of Nitrogen We stack entities based on slope curve. It starts with messing with the variables and challenging yourself to think differently Instead of just doing what the salesman or the tribe or the university says is the bmp Maybe they just want to continue status quo because your loyalty and lack of seeking truths are their profit center

Jason Mauck

32,048 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The world may be approaching an energy crisis worse than the Great Depression, and this time governments can't print their way out of it. Most people compare today's global financial risks to 2008, but economist Chris Martenson says that's the wrong comparison. The banking crisis was ultimately a financial problem, and governments responded by creating trillions of dollars, euros and pounds to stabilise the system. You can debate whether that was wise, but it worked because the problem was financial. This time, he warns, the problem will be physical. If the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb remain disrupted, the world doesn't just lose oil; it loses diesel, jet fuel, lubricants, natural gas, petrochemicals, and fertiliser. The countless industrial inputs that keep supply chains, factories, farms and transport networks operating. And as Chris put it: You can't print missing molecules. That's why he believes this crisis is fundamentally different. If those physical resources become scarce, printing more money doesn't solve the problem; it simply means more money is chasing fewer real goods. And according to Chris, we're already seeing early signs of that reality beneath the surface. While many people focus on crude oil prices, he says the real warning is coming from refined products like diesel, where shortages are becoming increasingly visible and supply chains are beginning to tighten. His concern is that policymakers are treating this like another financial crisis when it's actually an energy crisis. And those require completely different solutions that no one seems to be addressing yet. Chris Martenson

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The world may be approaching an energy crisis worse than the Great Depression, and this time governments can't print their way out of it. Most people compare today's global financial risks to 2008, but economist Chris Martenson says that's the wrong comparison. The banking crisis was ultimately a financial problem, and governments responded by creating trillions of dollars, euros and pounds to stabilise the system. You can debate whether that was wise, but it worked because the problem was financial. This time, he warns, the problem will be physical. If the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb remain disrupted, the world doesn't just lose oil; it loses diesel, jet fuel, lubricants, natural gas, petrochemicals, and fertiliser. The countless industrial inputs that keep supply chains, factories, farms and transport networks operating. And as Chris put it: You can't print missing molecules. That's why he believes this crisis is fundamentally different. If those physical resources become scarce, printing more money doesn't solve the problem; it simply means more money is chasing fewer real goods. And according to Chris, we're already seeing early signs of that reality beneath the surface. While many people focus on crude oil prices, he says the real warning is coming from refined products like diesel, where shortages are becoming increasingly visible and supply chains are beginning to tighten. His concern is that policymakers are treating this like another financial crisis when it's actually an energy crisis. And those require completely different solutions that no one seems to be addressing yet. Chris Martenson

Mario Nawfal

286,775 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Free Energy Announcement Free Energy, otherwise known as Overunity is 100% real. The devices exist already. I have been told exactly how an operational device works. I signed an NDA so I won't be able to disclose specifics. Instead, I want to explain the concepts so everyone understands how it is possible. Overunity means Coefficient of Performance (CoP) greater than 1. More energy coming out of the device than is being locally put into it. This allows for a system that can perpetually produce energy without being plugged in. Many will claim this breaks the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The reason it doesn't break the second law is similar to a windmill or solar panel. The system is open to the Aether (quantum fluctuations) in the same way those systems are open to nature. The first law of thermodynamics says energy cannot be created or destroyed. Solar and wind cannot output more energy than they take because the inputs are limited, but the Aether represents potentially unlimited additional energy input. This is how an Overunity system produces CoP greater 1. 'Free Energy' is a misnomer. It means that the potential energy accessed is unlimited, but it does not mean that the cost of extracting it is zero. The materials to produce an Overunity device are currently expensive, as is the labor to build it. When these devices become more efficient to produce, the cost will drop. The benefits of Overunity include; 1. Energy independence from energy companies 2. The ability to live off the grid 3. No loss of power when the grid fails 4. Green energy with no pollution 5. Cost savings over time from high energy bills The downsides of Overunity include; 1. Large initial device cost 2. Disbelief I hope this information is as exciting to you as it is to me. I will try to answer any questions I can in the comments below. I am also willing to appear on shows and podcasts to discuss these concepts with the public. There are more announcements to come in the near future. Thank you.

Free Energy Announcement Free Energy, otherwise known as Overunity is 100% real. The devices exist already. I have been told exactly how an operational device works. I signed an NDA so I won't be able to disclose specifics. Instead, I want to explain the concepts so everyone understands how it is possible. Overunity means Coefficient of Performance (CoP) greater than 1. More energy coming out of the device than is being locally put into it. This allows for a system that can perpetually produce energy without being plugged in. Many will claim this breaks the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The reason it doesn't break the second law is similar to a windmill or solar panel. The system is open to the Aether (quantum fluctuations) in the same way those systems are open to nature. The first law of thermodynamics says energy cannot be created or destroyed. Solar and wind cannot output more energy than they take because the inputs are limited, but the Aether represents potentially unlimited additional energy input. This is how an Overunity system produces CoP greater 1. 'Free Energy' is a misnomer. It means that the potential energy accessed is unlimited, but it does not mean that the cost of extracting it is zero. The materials to produce an Overunity device are currently expensive, as is the labor to build it. When these devices become more efficient to produce, the cost will drop. The benefits of Overunity include; 1. Energy independence from energy companies 2. The ability to live off the grid 3. No loss of power when the grid fails 4. Green energy with no pollution 5. Cost savings over time from high energy bills The downsides of Overunity include; 1. Large initial device cost 2. Disbelief I hope this information is as exciting to you as it is to me. I will try to answer any questions I can in the comments below. I am also willing to appear on shows and podcasts to discuss these concepts with the public. There are more announcements to come in the near future. Thank you.

Ashton Forbes

390,168 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Logan Paul says his weed withdrawals were very aggressive Logan: "Weed is a very powerful drug. I don't care who the fuck says it's not a drug. It's a fucking drug. I'm like the anti-weed guy pretty much my whole life. Then fully dedicated myself to becoming a pothead" "But I knew there was going to be a day where I had to call it quits because when I realized that I was high more than I wasn't high, it's a little problematic" "You know how I do shit, cold turkey. For me, my withdrawals are very aggressive. I was extremely irritable. Maybe I sound like a pussy, but I was really going through it" "The fact that you made it out of a heroin addiction, I have so much fucking respect for you and anyone who's beaten an addiction because this fucking sucks" Mike: "The difference between the two is weed is a mental and psychological battle, and when you get into the opiates and heroin stuff, it's a much more physical battle" "All drugs have comedowns and letdowns, so you have to respect the withdrawals no matter what drug it is"

Logan Paul says his weed withdrawals were very aggressive Logan: "Weed is a very powerful drug. I don't care who the fuck says it's not a drug. It's a fucking drug. I'm like the anti-weed guy pretty much my whole life. Then fully dedicated myself to becoming a pothead" "But I knew there was going to be a day where I had to call it quits because when I realized that I was high more than I wasn't high, it's a little problematic" "You know how I do shit, cold turkey. For me, my withdrawals are very aggressive. I was extremely irritable. Maybe I sound like a pussy, but I was really going through it" "The fact that you made it out of a heroin addiction, I have so much fucking respect for you and anyone who's beaten an addiction because this fucking sucks" Mike: "The difference between the two is weed is a mental and psychological battle, and when you get into the opiates and heroin stuff, it's a much more physical battle" "All drugs have comedowns and letdowns, so you have to respect the withdrawals no matter what drug it is"

dank

2,478,565 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten