Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Last night, in a massive warehouse just outside Edmonton, something extraordinary happened. Fifteen thousand Canadians showed up—not for a concert, not for a protest, but for a political rally. For one reason: to hear Pierre Poilievre speak. But the real shock? The man who introduced him. Stephen Harper—the most...

218,860 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Gerry Ritz
Gerry Ritzvor 1 Jahr

This is a game changer

Profilbild von Estadio Deportes
Estadio Deportesvor 1 Jahr

#ExtraCancha HUBO REUNIÓN 🙌 La noche de ayer, el presidente Trump anunció que tendría una reunión con Canadá y México la mañana de hoy. ¿Qué se sabe? Te lo contamos. 👇 #Trump #Sheinbaum #Aranceles

Profilbild von Carolyn Markell
Carolyn Markellvor 1 Jahr

I miss Harper. It felt good to hear him. Brought tears to my eyes. I so wish people would have listened back in 2015. Look at the mess now. He was right.

Profilbild von Parisfrench
Parisfrenchvor 1 Jahr

It’s really quite simple. We’ve been lead into disaster. We need a new management team. For the love of our country, PLEASE allow that to transpire and decide for ourselves if that change was worth it. Can’t get any worse.

Profilbild von ShaSher
ShaShervor 1 Jahr

Well said, I was there and it was a moment of truth and hope. Canada wake up, engage and vote.

Profilbild von Golden Retriever ❤️🍎
Golden Retriever ❤️🍎vor 1 Jahr

Let’s Bring It Home !!!! Let’s bring back our UNITED CANADA !!!

Profilbild von LacyJanes
LacyJanesvor 1 Jahr

So great to once again hear the wise words of Prime Minister @stephenharper

Profilbild von CdnDOGECzar
CdnDOGECzarvor 1 Jahr

Zero reference of this rally or its size by msm. Literal internal political interference by their lies and their lies by omission

Profilbild von Ned88 🇨🇦
Ned88 🇨🇦vor 1 Jahr

Amazing speech 🔥

Profilbild von Crypto Bobby
Crypto Bobbyvor 1 Jahr

@MarkJCarney This is how you lead a country. Your problem is, you are not worthy.

Ähnliche Videos

Pierre Poilievre Declares War on Red Tape and Liberal Decay in Osoyoos There was a moment in Osoyoos, British Columbia, this week when you could feel the tectonic plates of Canadian politics shift. Pierre Poilievre didn’t just give a campaign speech—he delivered a declaration of war. Not against a rival party, not against a foreign power, but against the bloated, self-sustaining bureaucracy that has buried this country in red tape, crushed small business, and handed our economic sovereignty to Washington. And he did it with names, numbers, and fire. Standing beside Conservative candidates Helena Konanz and Dan Albas—real people with skin in the game—Poilievre laid out the most aggressive anti-regulation, pro-prosperity plan Canada has seen in a generation. This wasn’t “efficiency.” It wasn’t “modernization.” It was a full-scale rollback of the federal state. A 25% cut to red tape within two years. A “two-for-one” regulation kill rule: for every new rule, two must die. A dollar-value offset: $1 of new administrative cost must be matched by $2 in cuts. And for once, someone’s watching the swamp: the Auditor General will audit compliance. No tricks. No loopholes. No gluing rulebooks together to fake progress like the Liberals did. Real cuts, enforced in public, with consequences. Now compare that to what the Liberals have done. Under Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney, the number of federal rules has exploded—149,000 and counting. That’s 20,000 more than a decade ago, with $51 billion in annual compliance costs for small businesses. It’s not just inefficiency. It’s economic sabotage. And who benefits from that sabotage? The United States. Poilievre didn’t dance around it—he hit it head-on. President Trump has said he prefers the Liberals in power. Why? Because they’re weak. Because they keep Canadian oil in the ground and Canadian dollars flowing south. “Trump supports the Liberals because he wants Canada to stay weak,” Poilievre said. “I want the opposite. I want to bring it home.” The press tried to corner him—tried to paint him as “too Trump-like.” The irony, of course, is that Trump has openly rejected him, because unlike Trudeau and Carney, Poilievre is not for sale. And then came the attacks on Aaron Gunn. The media paraded misinformation accusations that Gunn denied the impact of residential schools. Poilievre didn’t flinch. He called it out for what it was: misinformation. He defended his candidate. He stood for truth, not Twitter mobs. And he flipped the narrative: if you want prosperity and dignity for First Nations, give them control over resources, revenue, and jobs—not slogans. Then came the issue of interprovincial trade, where Poilievre again showed he’s living in the real world. Local wineries in the Okanagan are shipping their product to the U.S. because it’s easier than selling across provincial lines. Under the Liberals, it's harder to trade within Canada than with foreign nations. That’s not a federation—that’s a farce. Poilievre promised to tear down the internal barriers the Laurentian elite have protected for decades. The CBC? He torched it. Not with culture war talking points, but with precision. It’s become an overfunded, Toronto-centric mouthpiece for the Liberal Party, sucking up $1.5 billion a year to produce less local coverage than ever. Mark Carney just promised another $150 million with no plan to pay for it. Poilievre called it what it is: “a morbidly obese Liberal government—on steroids.” And he’s right. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal expenditure he’d reverse. Not one. He’s offering the same broken promises, wrapped in fancier language, from the same corrupt team. Poilievre, on the other hand, laid out a detailed plan to: Eliminate the GST on new homes and Canadian-made cars. Cut income taxes by 15%. Abolish the capital gains tax on money reinvested in Canada. Fast-track LNG projects on the West Coast. Repeal every anti-energy, anti-growth law passed by Trudeau’s swamp. He didn’t ask for permission. He promised results. He’s not trying to manage the decline. He’s here to stop it. Final Thoughts I’ve been watching these press conferences like a normal person, which means with my jaw somewhere on the floor. On one side, you’ve got Pierre Poilievre, actually talking about numbers, policies, things that, you know—exist in the real world. On the other side? You’ve got Mark Carney, Trudeau’s old economic braintrust, grinning like a Bond villain, promising to “invest” another $150 million into the CBC—because apparently, $1.5 billion a year isn’t enough to produce wall-to-wall Liberal talking points and a half-hour panel on white fragility. Carney calls it “public broadcasting.” Let’s call it what it is: state propaganda—funded by you, weaponized against you. And this is the guy who’s being sold to Canadians as the adult in the room? The savior? Mark Carney—the guy who’s spent the last decade not in Canada, but lecturing Canadians from London, New York, and climate finance panels in Geneva? He’s not some neutral economist. He’s a gold-plated Davos swamp rat who literally helped engineer the economic disaster we’re now living through—and now he wants to be rewarded with the keys to the kingdom? This man flew in from Glasgow—no joke—where he was pushing his net-zero snake oil to a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who couldn’t find Fort McMurray on a map if their Tesla battery depended on it. And what’s he proposing now? Keep Bill C-69, the law that strangled Canadian energy, killed pipeline after pipeline, and handed America control over our oil wealth. Keep the law that says: If you want to build anything in this country, you better ask permission from 14 departments and Greta Thunberg’s cousin first. Oh, and while he’s at it, don’t expect a single dollar of waste to be cut. Not one. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal program he’d reduce. Not the CBC. Not the bloated bureaucracy. Not even the social engineering schemes buried deep in your child’s classroom. So let’s spell it out: Mark Carney is Trudeau without the TikTok. Same worldview. Same smugness. Same ideology. Except now he’s dressed it up in Oxford accents and finance jargon and thinks you’re too dumb to notice. He talks about “fighting climate change,” but never mentions the carbon imports from China. He talks about “building the future,” while propping up the same agencies that couldn’t build a bus stop on time. He talks about “standing up to Trump,” while literally keeping in place the laws that give Trump control over our energy, our jobs, our investment. And we’re supposed to believe he’s the serious one? No. What he is—is the avatar of managed decline. The velvet glove of the same iron fist that’s been throttling Canadian prosperity for ten years. Poilievre sees it, and he’s naming it. That’s why the media hate him. That’s why the Liberals fear him. And that’s why Donald Trump doesn’t want him elected—because he won’t roll over like Carney will. So again—this is not a normal election. It’s not Liberal vs. Conservative. It’s not progressive vs. populist. It’s elite decay vs. national revival. Poilievre doesn’t want to “manage” this slow-motion collapse. He wants to rip the duct tape off the pipes, shut down the bureaucracy, and start building again. He didn’t ask for permission. He didn’t host a panel. He promised results. And when he says “Canada First,” it’s not some borrowed slogan. It’s a warning to the swamp: Your time is up. Carney is decline dressed as competence. Poilievre is the first sign of life this country has had in a decade. So yeah, Pierre Poilievre chose defiance. Now it’s your turn.

Dan Knight

47,215 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

OP-ED : The Notwithstanding Clause Is How We Save Canada—from the People Who Broke It If you listen to the Canadian media—most of whom could be replaced by cardboard cutouts of Mark Carney—you’d think Pierre Poilievre is preparing to burn the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the front steps of Parliament. He’s been accused of authoritarianism, of threatening democracy, even of “undermining the rule of law.” What’s his crime? He wants to use a constitutional tool—the Notwithstanding Clause—to stop mass murderers from gaming the parole system and walking free. Let’s back up, because this isn’t hysteria. This is strategy. And it starts with a court decision. In 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R v. Bissonnette that judges can no longer impose consecutive parole ineligibility periods on people convicted of multiple murders. Their logic? It violated Section 12 of the Charter—protection against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Under this ruling, someone who murders six people can apply for parole after 25 years, the same as someone who murdered one. Let’s be clear: that wasn’t a fluke. It wasn’t a clerical error. It was a judicial statement that mass murder should not carry a heavier penalty than single homicide. It’s insane. And it’s now the law. Poilievre has said plainly what most Canadians are thinking: no more. His platform includes restoring consecutive parole ineligibility for multiple murderers—using Section 33 of the Charter, the Notwithstanding Clause, to override the Supreme Court's ruling. That clause, by the way, wasn’t invented by some right-wing populist—it was authored during the patriation of the Constitution by Allan Blakeney, Peter Lougheed, and, yes, Pierre Elliott Trudeau himself. It was written to give elected governments the final word when courts lose the plot. So when Liberal insiders like Mark Carney call Poilievre’s move “dangerous,” let’s be honest about what they’re really saying. They're not worried about your rights. They're worried about their power. Let’s talk about Carney. Carney is the Liberal establishment personified. A man who has never been elected to anything, but acts like the nation owes him its premiership. A former central banker, an unelected global bureaucrat, a Davos man through and through. And now, the man parachuted in by the Liberal Party to rescue it from the wreckage of Justin Trudeau. Mark Carney says the use of the Notwithstanding Clause in this case is a “threat to democracy.” This is the same Mark Carney who, in 2022, wrote an op-ed in The Globe and Mail calling the Freedom Convoy “sedition.” He supported the invocation of the Emergencies Act against peaceful protestors. He said, “You can’t have liberty without order,” as Trudeau’s government froze bank accounts without charges or trials, targeted working-class Canadians, and abused financial institutions to silence dissent. You want to talk about civil liberties? That was the real violation. Carney didn’t object to that. He didn’t call it “dangerous.” He supported it. And he supports Bills C-11 and C-18, which hand the federal government the power to control what Canadians see, post, and share online. These are the Trudeau government’s censorship bills—sold as “support for Canadian content,” but in reality, giving the CRTC the authority to prioritize or bury content based on government-set criteria. Censorship? Government-controlled financial punishment? Total silence when bail laws are gutted and criminals walk free? Mark Carney has no problem with any of that. But when Pierre Poilievre wants to keep Paul Bernardo—a man who raped, tortured, and murdered teenage girls—from applying for parole every two years, now it’s a civil liberties emergency? Let’s be clear: Paul Bernardo is not some abstract example. He’s not theoretical. He’s a real person, a real monster. His crimes are so depraved they defy description. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murders of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, and he was behind the “Scarborough Rapist” attacks on at least 14 other women. And yet, under Canada’s current law, he gets to apply for parole every two years. The families of his victims are forced to prepare victim impact statements and re-live the trauma again and again. That’s the system the Liberals built. That’s the legacy Poilievre wants to overturn. And they’re terrified, because with one constitutional stroke—one Notwithstanding Clause—he can. He can restore sentences that reflect justice. He can return power from unelected judges to elected lawmakers. He can protect victims instead of appeasing criminals. And most dangerously—for them—he can show Canadians that this decaying, dysfunctional, upside-down system can actually be fixed. That’s why they’re panicking. Because Poilievre isn’t threatening the rule of law. He’s threatening the rule of them. The Notwithstanding Clause doesn’t destroy democracy. It saves it. It gives voice to the people when institutions lose sight of the public interest. It exists for moments like this—when killers get a second chance and victims don’t. So when Carney and his media allies start foaming at the mouth over “tyranny,” remember this: it’s not about rights. It’s about the swamp defending itself. Because once Canadians realize the Notwithstanding Clause can be used to take back their streets, their justice system, and their country from people like Mark Carney, they’ll wonder why it wasn’t used sooner. This election, Canadians are being handed a rare opportunity—not just to vote for a different government, but to reclaim the country from the institutions and elites who hollowed it out. For years, the Liberals have ruled through back channels: unelected judges, unaccountable regulators, international bankers like Mark Carney. They’ve told you crime is compassion, censorship is safety, and freedom is dangerous. And if you dared to disagree, they froze your bank account and silenced your voice. Now, with the Notwithstanding Clause, Pierre Poilievre is threatening to unwind it all. Not with riots. Not with chaos. With a legal tool, written into the Constitution by the very people now pretending it’s a threat. He’s not dismantling democracy. He’s using it. He’s not a danger to the country. He’s the first serious chance to save it. Because if we don’t have the right to keep mass murderers in prison… If we don’t have the right to protect our kids, our streets, and our speech… Then what do we really have left? Canada is at a crossroads. One path leads to more decay, more lies, and more of the same. The other leads out of the swamp. You know the path. You know who’s on it. And you know exactly who to vote for.

Dan Knight

21,237 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Today, in Melbourne, Brad Battin was rolled for Jess Wilson. It happened swiftly and without warning. Like thieves in the night they rolled in, and by morning, Brad was rolled out. Why? Surely there must be a reason. Maybe it was because he is a man. A mature man, with 50 years of life experience. Maybe it was because he had held a number of real jobs. Maybe it is because he served the state as a police officer. Maybe it is because he had owned and run a business. Maybe because he never was a staffer. Maybe it was because he didn’t come from Liberal royalty in Kooyong. Maybe it was because he was opening doors in new areas, places that had not considered voting Liberal before. Or maybe it was because he didn’t go to the right schools or move in the proper circles… Maybe. It could be because he was effective as an opposition leader. He was indeed shifting the polls and government policy - particularly on the youth crime epidemic plaguing Melbourne. It could even be because he was against “the Voice”, like most of the rest of his state. Maybe because he was against the treaty, that has put the property rights of all Victorians under a cloud. It is possible it was because he is against 100% renewables. Maybe he just wasn’t doing as he was told by the backroom boys - the lobbyists, the hacks and the spivs. It might even be because he knows what a woman is. Possibly some of those things… probably all of them. Because from out here, it looks like Jess Wilson is the solution to all of those ‘problems’. Just another young, inexperienced, former staffer. Just another progressive lady, who will solve the woman problem in the Liberal party, by helping the rest of us define it. Whatever the reason, I am sure the Liberals have just stolen defeat from the jaws of Victory as the inner-city elites that run the show shake their million dollar watches, fists clenched at the voters choosing Teal. As the former Liberal strongholds leave the blue team in their droves, in pursuit of a better brand of champagne socialism, they plant a foot squarely on the throats of the socially conservative and economically aspirational. The Liberals, desperate to chase back what they have lost, install Wilson in a pathetic last-ditch effort to woo them back. Demonstrating they too are happy to put the boot into those less progressive and more aspirational. People that just want to buy a home, pay the power bill, and maybe just run their homes in peace. Labor ran away from them long ago, as they pursued the same anti-Australian, anti-aspirational policies that please the Liberal lobbyists, Teal voters, Green voters, Unions and the Liberal backroom boys. The choice has never been less clear. Go with the progressive socialist that you know, or the progressive socialist that pretends to understand the economy better. The red or the blue, it’s up to you. Or maybe this is the election where the Liberals in Victoria go the way of SA, and WA, as they get packed into a minivan and sent away. One thing is for sure, the minor party and independent vote at the Victorian election will be record breaking, because the major parties are completely absorbed in their own brilliance. Completely wrapped up in themselves, holed up in their lavish offices as the groaning public feel the pain of decades of neglect. I would urge Brad Battin to hold his head up. His treatment by the corrupt and out of touch Victorian Liberal Party is a badge of honour. They are like the robbers he spent much of his career trying to catch. Like thieves in the night they shall slink off into the thickness of the dark. What happened to him today was very ‘modern’ Liberal, but hardly very Australian. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

88,992 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten