Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Last year I called the Tyler Soderstrom breakout. My pick this year: Dominic Canzone .290 xBA .533 xSLG 14.4% Barrel rate 49.7% HardHit% 10% Brls/PA (23rd in MLB, min. 150 BBEs) The plate discipline still needs work, but the quality of contact is real.

187,978 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I feel like the Jays fans are going through what we went through last year with Devin Williams. A year after giving up a historical, gut punching home run to be a big factor in losing his team a do/die game, the underlying metrics have looked amazing but haven't matched the results in the slightest. The peripherals on his season are outstanding. 🔹2.68 xERA || 2.31 FIP || 1.78 xFIP || 🔹99th-100th percentile Chase%, whiff%, K%..the stuff is stuffing. And he only has a 6.9% BB rate. 🔹A 37.9 K% - 6.9 BB% is absurdly good and this is one of the best predictive metrics we have in the sport 🔹Also limits hard contact: 6.5% Barrel rate and 30.6% Hardhit rate 🔹Andddd keeps balls on the ground for the most part But the results make no sense: 4.62 ERA (now higher obviously) .492 BABIP 68.8% LOB 16.7 HR/FB% This is almost identical to what we went through with Devin. On the one side, a lot of the data guys are (and understandably) saying this is a really good pitcher that needs more time for things to come back down to earth. But then you have more of the not-so data crowd (+ even some of the data crowd by now) saying this is a guy that shouldnt see high leverage again. And I understand both, just as I did with the Devin situation. It's hard to fault fans for just not wanting any part of this after what happened last year + what they feel as a fan this year. But then again, it's hard to ignore how dam good the data looks too, which is more often more correct than the eye.

Yankees Stats

61,938 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce