Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Latinos are easily fooled, supporting Democrats like Tom Steyer & Xavier Becerra despite their ICE detention center investments and child welfare failures. Blind party loyalty overrides critical thinking. #Latinos #Hypocrisy #Politics

thelastcheli's profile picture

Araceli Unfiltered

4,755 subscribers

10,897 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics#Latinos#Hypocrisy#Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 WOW! DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin NAILED IT on the traitor liberals storming ICE facilities on MEMORIAL DAY of all days "They decide to go out and protest a detention center or warehousing, r*pist, child pr*dators, murderers, drug dealers, and they choose MEMORIAL DAY of all the time to go protest something!" "That they say that it's because they're on a hunger strike, when there was only a handful of individuals that were refusing to eat because they want their ethnic right food, or they go back to their country and get whatever food they want." "The fact is we're given the calories they want. This isn't holiday in, we're given sanitation, but for the Democrats and the governor like Governor Sherrill and Senator Kim and Senator Booker to go out and do something like this of all the days is very frustrating and we see Antifa science are literally out there."
1:08

🚨 WOW! DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin NAILED IT on the traitor liberals storming ICE facilities on MEMORIAL DAY of all days "They decide to go out and protest a detention center or warehousing, r*pist, child pr*dators, murderers, drug dealers, and they choose MEMORIAL DAY of all the time to go protest something!" "That they say that it's because they're on a hunger strike, when there was only a handful of individuals that were refusing to eat because they want their ethnic right food, or they go back to their country and get whatever food they want." "The fact is we're given the calories they want. This isn't holiday in, we're given sanitation, but for the Democrats and the governor like Governor Sherrill and Senator Kim and Senator Booker to go out and do something like this of all the days is very frustrating and we see Antifa science are literally out there."

Eric Daugherty

26,720 views • 3 months ago

Watch Democrats WIN the California election WITH THIS ONE SIMPLE TRICK🪄🎩🐇 Larry O'Connor explains how Democrats plan to STEAL the California gubernatorial race from Republican Steve Hilton, even though he's currently leading the vote tally. "Now, in any normal election, in any normal time, in any normal state, in any normal country that utilizes the tools of democracy, you see an election night return like this, and you know well, if they're only taking the top two, certainly Steve Hilton is going to be one of those top two." Democrat Tom Steyer, currently in 3rd place, needs 300,000 votes to overtake Hilton. With 4 million votes still to be counted, it's expected that Steyer will easily close the gap. "It's normal that the guy who is trailing by seven percentage points right now in third place is obviously going to benefit from all of the uncounted ballots that we're all going to discover and we're going to find, and I fear that's exactly what's going to happen." O'Connor says that Steyer and Democrat Xavier Becerra, currently in 2nd place, can box out Republicans from winning the governorship with their dirty tricks and the corporate media is just going along with it. "You've got the news media, instead of saying, 'Hey, that doesn't seem right. That shouldn't be the way we do things in this country.' Instead, they're actually preparing you for that. They're actually trying to educate you and let you know that this is all very normal. And it's not. It's not normal at all." O'Connor explains how Democrats plan to use ballot harvesting to steal the election in California. "In California, they have these rules, these rules, all these early votes or all of these drop-in ballot votes and all of these votes that have been sitting in drop boxes just waiting to be counted. That's what they're about to count, you see, and where did a lot of those votes come from? Well, here's what they do. "They do a thing called ballot harvesting. And in California, a person, a person on the payroll of an NGO or some sort of left-wing political group, can go to, like, a nursing home or a hospice care facility or an early LEARING center or a big apartment building in the hood. And they can go in there, and they can collect ballots on your behalf because, you know, you're incapable of going and voting yourself. "And they can collect all your ballots. In fact, in my opinion, they probably fill out those ballots for you, and they collect them all. They take them with them, and then they deposit them. And that's a big chunk of these early votes. They're all deposited in these drop boxes, you know, the ones that get caught on fire by criminal vagrants who Spencer Pratt is trying to get off the street and Steve Hilton is trying to arrest. "They're sitting there in the middle of the tent cities. And we've already seen, thanks to the undercover work of James O'Keefe and other groups, that that these same NGOs are paying homeless people to fill out ballots and then collect them, and then dropping them in those drop boxes. Those are the votes that are about to be counted. And Steve Kornacki is letting you know they're probably not Hilton votes. It's amazing to watch it develop right before your eyes. But this is how Steve Hilton loses, even though he won." L A R R Y
4:12

Watch Democrats WIN the California election WITH THIS ONE SIMPLE TRICK🪄🎩🐇 Larry O'Connor explains how Democrats plan to STEAL the California gubernatorial race from Republican Steve Hilton, even though he's currently leading the vote tally. "Now, in any normal election, in any normal time, in any normal state, in any normal country that utilizes the tools of democracy, you see an election night return like this, and you know well, if they're only taking the top two, certainly Steve Hilton is going to be one of those top two." Democrat Tom Steyer, currently in 3rd place, needs 300,000 votes to overtake Hilton. With 4 million votes still to be counted, it's expected that Steyer will easily close the gap. "It's normal that the guy who is trailing by seven percentage points right now in third place is obviously going to benefit from all of the uncounted ballots that we're all going to discover and we're going to find, and I fear that's exactly what's going to happen." O'Connor says that Steyer and Democrat Xavier Becerra, currently in 2nd place, can box out Republicans from winning the governorship with their dirty tricks and the corporate media is just going along with it. "You've got the news media, instead of saying, 'Hey, that doesn't seem right. That shouldn't be the way we do things in this country.' Instead, they're actually preparing you for that. They're actually trying to educate you and let you know that this is all very normal. And it's not. It's not normal at all." O'Connor explains how Democrats plan to use ballot harvesting to steal the election in California. "In California, they have these rules, these rules, all these early votes or all of these drop-in ballot votes and all of these votes that have been sitting in drop boxes just waiting to be counted. That's what they're about to count, you see, and where did a lot of those votes come from? Well, here's what they do. "They do a thing called ballot harvesting. And in California, a person, a person on the payroll of an NGO or some sort of left-wing political group, can go to, like, a nursing home or a hospice care facility or an early LEARING center or a big apartment building in the hood. And they can go in there, and they can collect ballots on your behalf because, you know, you're incapable of going and voting yourself. "And they can collect all your ballots. In fact, in my opinion, they probably fill out those ballots for you, and they collect them all. They take them with them, and then they deposit them. And that's a big chunk of these early votes. They're all deposited in these drop boxes, you know, the ones that get caught on fire by criminal vagrants who Spencer Pratt is trying to get off the street and Steve Hilton is trying to arrest. "They're sitting there in the middle of the tent cities. And we've already seen, thanks to the undercover work of James O'Keefe and other groups, that that these same NGOs are paying homeless people to fill out ballots and then collect them, and then dropping them in those drop boxes. Those are the votes that are about to be counted. And Steve Kornacki is letting you know they're probably not Hilton votes. It's amazing to watch it develop right before your eyes. But this is how Steve Hilton loses, even though he won." L A R R Y

Townhall.com

23,367 views • 3 months ago

Partisan Charities Failed To Win In 2024 You can’t help noticing how different the 2020 and 2024 elections look. After the 2020 election, Democrats insisted that over $400 million in Zuck Bucks had no significant effect on voter turnout. Biden, they suggested, earned a record-breaking 81 million votes through sheer charisma. But why didn’t it work the second time, in 2024? The answer: Because the supposedly nonpartisan charities that helped the Democrats win in 2020 couldn’t duplicate their achievements in 2024. The Left’s get-out-the-vote machine enjoyed tremendous success in 2020 as it registered millions of swing-state voters to defeat Trump while attracting more donors than ever before. But in 2024, sagging polls made the Left’s get-out-the-vote machine desperate. The Left dug deep in its bag of tricks, looking for ways to win. Those tricks included obnoxious ads, intimidating letters, mail-in ballot request forms bearing Michelle Obama’s face, misleading text messages, and remember-to-vote postcards designed to look like lottery tickets. Most of the obnoxious ads came from “charities” legally required to be nonpartisan and not favor one political party. But law or no law, groups like Voter Participation Center, Everybody Votes Campaign, and State Voices were tapped to help Democrats win by “organizing” the so-called “New American Majority,” a made-up cocktail of all demographic groups that used to favor Democrats. In 2020, dozens of groups used this model to get out the vote, and it worked. After 2020, everything began to collapse. Scrutiny from journalists, Republican legislators, think-tank leaders, and law enforcement put the Left’s machine on notice. Worse, the target voters began to move rightward. In November 2023, George Soros canceled a $67 million pledge that his charitable foundation had made to Latino get-out-the-vote groups. Almost certainly the money dried up because Democrats were seeing “Latinos peel away from the party” even before the 2024 election, as one left-leaning reporter put it. The partisanship of the allegedly “charitable” groups which for years had been getting out the Democratic vote was even more obvious after a memo from Democratic strategist Aaron Strauss “sparked a furious debate,” as the Washington Post reported. The memo advised Democratic megadonors to abandon “nonpartisan” voter registration. Why? Because most unregistered voters are no longer Democrats. No wonder the 2024 election didn’t look like 2020. The Left’s get-out-the-vote machine using supposedly nonpartisan charities simply failed in 2024. But that doesn’t mean the Left didn’t try in 2024, and it doesn’t mean they didn’t succeed in 2020. It just means their shady get-out-the-vote strategy of abusing the charitable sector had a limited shelf life. Learn more at
3:13

Partisan Charities Failed To Win In 2024 You can’t help noticing how different the 2020 and 2024 elections look. After the 2020 election, Democrats insisted that over $400 million in Zuck Bucks had no significant effect on voter turnout. Biden, they suggested, earned a record-breaking 81 million votes through sheer charisma. But why didn’t it work the second time, in 2024? The answer: Because the supposedly nonpartisan charities that helped the Democrats win in 2020 couldn’t duplicate their achievements in 2024. The Left’s get-out-the-vote machine enjoyed tremendous success in 2020 as it registered millions of swing-state voters to defeat Trump while attracting more donors than ever before. But in 2024, sagging polls made the Left’s get-out-the-vote machine desperate. The Left dug deep in its bag of tricks, looking for ways to win. Those tricks included obnoxious ads, intimidating letters, mail-in ballot request forms bearing Michelle Obama’s face, misleading text messages, and remember-to-vote postcards designed to look like lottery tickets. Most of the obnoxious ads came from “charities” legally required to be nonpartisan and not favor one political party. But law or no law, groups like Voter Participation Center, Everybody Votes Campaign, and State Voices were tapped to help Democrats win by “organizing” the so-called “New American Majority,” a made-up cocktail of all demographic groups that used to favor Democrats. In 2020, dozens of groups used this model to get out the vote, and it worked. After 2020, everything began to collapse. Scrutiny from journalists, Republican legislators, think-tank leaders, and law enforcement put the Left’s machine on notice. Worse, the target voters began to move rightward. In November 2023, George Soros canceled a $67 million pledge that his charitable foundation had made to Latino get-out-the-vote groups. Almost certainly the money dried up because Democrats were seeing “Latinos peel away from the party” even before the 2024 election, as one left-leaning reporter put it. The partisanship of the allegedly “charitable” groups which for years had been getting out the Democratic vote was even more obvious after a memo from Democratic strategist Aaron Strauss “sparked a furious debate,” as the Washington Post reported. The memo advised Democratic megadonors to abandon “nonpartisan” voter registration. Why? Because most unregistered voters are no longer Democrats. No wonder the 2024 election didn’t look like 2020. The Left’s get-out-the-vote machine using supposedly nonpartisan charities simply failed in 2024. But that doesn’t mean the Left didn’t try in 2024, and it doesn’t mean they didn’t succeed in 2020. It just means their shady get-out-the-vote strategy of abusing the charitable sector had a limited shelf life. Learn more at

Capital Research Center

70,221 views • 1 year ago

Greg Gutfeld just delivered a savage 2-minute monologue exposing exactly why 60% of Democrats are ending relationships over politics. He nailed the hypocrisy with one brutal question about dads and Trump: “If your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe question whether your dad doesn’t love a Hitler figure?” GUTFELD: “You know, the difference between Dems and Republicans come down to one thing.” “They apply moral value to political preference, and that would make sense if your political party praised Hitler or protected murderers and sex fiends.” “But the mistake is, it’s not the Republicans. But they have always compared Republicans to some kind of existential threat.” “They’ve done it with climate change, they’ve done it with compassion, they do it with Trump.” “That allows them to label them as amoral.” “Republicans are not evil. We have a different path to the pursuit of happiness, and serenity…” “I don’t care that you hate Trump. Why should you care that I like him? The answer would be because he’s evil.” “He’s like a Nazi. Well, this is where the whole thing falls apart.” “What does that mean to me if I’m your Republican friend who voted for Trump? That you would believe I would support a Nazi. We’ve been friends for years.” “If you are my friend, you have to realize that’s illogical, because how were we friends for 10 or 20 years and now you find out I was a fascist?” “How did that happen?” “You knew I was a right winger in 80s, in the 90s and now all of the sudden you’re like, oh I can’t be seen with him.” “So the key moment in the self-realization of a liberal should be, if your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe question whether your dad doesn’t love a Hitler figure?” “And therefore, maybe Trump is not a Hitler figure, and that flaw in your thinking should put into question the reliability on your filter, on your life.” Democrats are destroying their own relationships over a lie.
2:09

Greg Gutfeld just delivered a savage 2-minute monologue exposing exactly why 60% of Democrats are ending relationships over politics. He nailed the hypocrisy with one brutal question about dads and Trump: “If your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe question whether your dad doesn’t love a Hitler figure?” GUTFELD: “You know, the difference between Dems and Republicans come down to one thing.” “They apply moral value to political preference, and that would make sense if your political party praised Hitler or protected murderers and sex fiends.” “But the mistake is, it’s not the Republicans. But they have always compared Republicans to some kind of existential threat.” “They’ve done it with climate change, they’ve done it with compassion, they do it with Trump.” “That allows them to label them as amoral.” “Republicans are not evil. We have a different path to the pursuit of happiness, and serenity…” “I don’t care that you hate Trump. Why should you care that I like him? The answer would be because he’s evil.” “He’s like a Nazi. Well, this is where the whole thing falls apart.” “What does that mean to me if I’m your Republican friend who voted for Trump? That you would believe I would support a Nazi. We’ve been friends for years.” “If you are my friend, you have to realize that’s illogical, because how were we friends for 10 or 20 years and now you find out I was a fascist?” “How did that happen?” “You knew I was a right winger in 80s, in the 90s and now all of the sudden you’re like, oh I can’t be seen with him.” “So the key moment in the self-realization of a liberal should be, if your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe question whether your dad doesn’t love a Hitler figure?” “And therefore, maybe Trump is not a Hitler figure, and that flaw in your thinking should put into question the reliability on your filter, on your life.” Democrats are destroying their own relationships over a lie.

Overton

356,684 views • 4 months ago

Victor Davis Hanson Exposes the Democrats’ Sinister Plan to Destroy America—A 10-Point Breakdown For years, we’ve been told the Democratic Party has no real agenda, that they’re just aimlessly opposing President Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump and Elon Musk while clinging to power. But Victor Davis Hanson has peeled back the curtain, exposing the organized, calculated destruction they are orchestrating behind the scenes. Make no mistake—this is not incompetence. It’s a deliberate strategy to collapse America from within, weaken its institutions, and install permanent leftist rule. 🚨 Here’s the Democrats’ True 10-Point Plan to Destroy the Nation: 1️⃣ Demonize & Destroy Trump and Musk The left sees Trump and Musk as their two biggest threats. Trump, because he is the leader of the populist, America First movement, and Musk, because he disrupted their control over social media and free speech. 🔹 Trump is painted as "Mussolini-like", a dictator who must be destroyed at all costs. They fabricate criminal charges, coordinate deep-state prosecutions, and weaponize the legal system against him. 🔹 Musk is attacked for allowing free speech on X (formerly Twitter), exposing government collusion with Big Tech, and creating independent wealth and influence outside of their control. The strategy? Depersonalize, dehumanize, and destroy both men—so no one else dares to stand up. 2️⃣ Flood the Country with Illegals & Overwhelm the System Under Biden, over 12 million illegal immigrants have entered the U.S. This is NOT an accident. 🔹 The left wants to dilute the power of American citizens, using illegal immigrants as a permanent underclass to vote Democrat in exchange for government handouts. 🔹 Sanctuary cities shield criminals, and even violent offenders avoid deportation because stopping ICE is part of the plan. 🔹 The burden on hospitals, schools, and social programs is intentional, designed to crash the system and make Americans dependent on government welfare. The endgame? Flood America with illegals, grant them voting rights, and turn every election into one-party rule. 3️⃣ Elevate Hamas & Radical Islam Over Israel & The West Democrats have openly sided with Palestinian extremists and are pushing a radical anti-Israel agenda. Why? 🔹 They foster Jew-hatred to divide and destabilize the country, allowing radicals to control the narrative on college campuses and in the streets. 🔹 Pro-Hamas activists are protected while Christian and Jewish voices are censored and persecuted. 🔹 Israel, America’s closest ally in the Middle East, is being systematically undermined in favor of terrorist sympathizers. The strategy? Stoke radical unrest, import Middle Eastern conflicts onto American soil, and create permanent social division. 4️⃣ Runaway Spending to Collapse the Economy The national debt is at $36 TRILLION, and Democrats refuse to stop spending. 🔹 Biden has added $7-8 trillion in new debt, knowing full well the system cannot sustain it. 🔹 Massive government waste is ignored, and agencies like the FBI, IRS, and CDC are used as political weapons instead of being reformed. 🔹 Inflation is intentional—they want to devalue your dollar, destroy savings, and force dependency on government. The goal? A financial meltdown that justifies “emergency measures”, like a digital currency, social credit scores, and the erosion of economic freedom. 5️⃣ Permanent War—At Any Cost The Democrats are fully committed to endless war in Ukraine with no accountability and no exit strategy. 🔹 Hundreds of billions have been funneled into Ukraine, with no oversight and no audit. 🔹 Biden’s State Department rejects peace talks because keeping the war going weakens Russia while allowing the U.S. military-industrial complex to profit. 🔹 They are willing to fight to the last Ukrainian, sacrificing millions to keep their war machine running. The goal? Perpetual war to justify expanding government power, crushing dissent, and laundering billions through foreign conflicts. 6️⃣ Push DEI & Woke Ideology to Undermine Meritocracy Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is nothing more than state-sponsored discrimination. 🔹 Competence is being replaced by skin color quotas—even in critical jobs like air traffic control, law enforcement, and medicine. 🔹 Race-based hiring is dividing the country, making mediocrity the standard and eroding competitiveness. 🔹 Disloyal radicals are being placed in government and corporate positions to push Marxist ideology from within. The goal? Make race and identity politics the new standard, ensuring division, resentment, and decay. 7️⃣ Unleash Chaos & Political Violence The Democratic Party is actively encouraging civil unrest: 🔹 Screaming down opponents in Congress, refusing to allow civil discourse. 🔹 Encouraging mobs at town halls to create the illusion of popular support. 🔹 Pushing for radical protests and violent riots when their agenda is challenged. The objective? Normalize mob rule, voter intimidation, and street activism as acceptable tactics. 8️⃣ Normalize Profanity & Depravity to Degrade Society The left has abandoned civility and morality, choosing instead to embrace vulgarity and degeneracy: 🔹 Elected officials scream profanity in public to appear "authentic." 🔹 Social media is flooded with vile, degrading content while conservative voices are censored. 🔹 Destroying traditional values through hyper-sexualization, woke indoctrination, and attacks on religion. The goal? Lower standards, erase American dignity, and make barbarism the new normal. 9️⃣ Hide Their Agenda with Fake Crises & Manufactured Outrage Whenever the left faces backlash, they create a new distraction: 🔹 Another Trump indictment whenever Biden’s corruption gets exposed. 🔹 A new “racism” scandal to divert from their failures. 🔹 Climate hysteria, pandemics, or emergency declarations to justify crackdowns on liberty. The plan? Keep America permanently distracted, so the real destruction goes unnoticed. 🔟 Slow, Silent Decline Instead of Rapid Restoration The left doesn’t want progress—they want managed decline: 🔹 They are happy to let America decay slowly, as long as they stay in power. 🔹 A weak, demoralized, dependent population is easier to control than a self-sufficient one. 🔹 The ultimate goal is a European-style socialist state, where government controls healthcare, industry, and speech. 🔴 The Final Question: Will Americans Wake Up Before It’s Too Late? The left THRIVES on apathy. They hope you do nothing. They want you distracted, hopeless, and silent. 🔥 But we are not powerless. We can fight back. 📢 Spread the truth. Share this video. Expose their plan. 📌 WATCH THE FULL BREAKDOWN HERE:
7:45

Victor Davis Hanson Exposes the Democrats’ Sinister Plan to Destroy America—A 10-Point Breakdown For years, we’ve been told the Democratic Party has no real agenda, that they’re just aimlessly opposing President Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump and Elon Musk while clinging to power. But Victor Davis Hanson has peeled back the curtain, exposing the organized, calculated destruction they are orchestrating behind the scenes. Make no mistake—this is not incompetence. It’s a deliberate strategy to collapse America from within, weaken its institutions, and install permanent leftist rule. 🚨 Here’s the Democrats’ True 10-Point Plan to Destroy the Nation: 1️⃣ Demonize & Destroy Trump and Musk The left sees Trump and Musk as their two biggest threats. Trump, because he is the leader of the populist, America First movement, and Musk, because he disrupted their control over social media and free speech. 🔹 Trump is painted as "Mussolini-like", a dictator who must be destroyed at all costs. They fabricate criminal charges, coordinate deep-state prosecutions, and weaponize the legal system against him. 🔹 Musk is attacked for allowing free speech on X (formerly Twitter), exposing government collusion with Big Tech, and creating independent wealth and influence outside of their control. The strategy? Depersonalize, dehumanize, and destroy both men—so no one else dares to stand up. 2️⃣ Flood the Country with Illegals & Overwhelm the System Under Biden, over 12 million illegal immigrants have entered the U.S. This is NOT an accident. 🔹 The left wants to dilute the power of American citizens, using illegal immigrants as a permanent underclass to vote Democrat in exchange for government handouts. 🔹 Sanctuary cities shield criminals, and even violent offenders avoid deportation because stopping ICE is part of the plan. 🔹 The burden on hospitals, schools, and social programs is intentional, designed to crash the system and make Americans dependent on government welfare. The endgame? Flood America with illegals, grant them voting rights, and turn every election into one-party rule. 3️⃣ Elevate Hamas & Radical Islam Over Israel & The West Democrats have openly sided with Palestinian extremists and are pushing a radical anti-Israel agenda. Why? 🔹 They foster Jew-hatred to divide and destabilize the country, allowing radicals to control the narrative on college campuses and in the streets. 🔹 Pro-Hamas activists are protected while Christian and Jewish voices are censored and persecuted. 🔹 Israel, America’s closest ally in the Middle East, is being systematically undermined in favor of terrorist sympathizers. The strategy? Stoke radical unrest, import Middle Eastern conflicts onto American soil, and create permanent social division. 4️⃣ Runaway Spending to Collapse the Economy The national debt is at $36 TRILLION, and Democrats refuse to stop spending. 🔹 Biden has added $7-8 trillion in new debt, knowing full well the system cannot sustain it. 🔹 Massive government waste is ignored, and agencies like the FBI, IRS, and CDC are used as political weapons instead of being reformed. 🔹 Inflation is intentional—they want to devalue your dollar, destroy savings, and force dependency on government. The goal? A financial meltdown that justifies “emergency measures”, like a digital currency, social credit scores, and the erosion of economic freedom. 5️⃣ Permanent War—At Any Cost The Democrats are fully committed to endless war in Ukraine with no accountability and no exit strategy. 🔹 Hundreds of billions have been funneled into Ukraine, with no oversight and no audit. 🔹 Biden’s State Department rejects peace talks because keeping the war going weakens Russia while allowing the U.S. military-industrial complex to profit. 🔹 They are willing to fight to the last Ukrainian, sacrificing millions to keep their war machine running. The goal? Perpetual war to justify expanding government power, crushing dissent, and laundering billions through foreign conflicts. 6️⃣ Push DEI & Woke Ideology to Undermine Meritocracy Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is nothing more than state-sponsored discrimination. 🔹 Competence is being replaced by skin color quotas—even in critical jobs like air traffic control, law enforcement, and medicine. 🔹 Race-based hiring is dividing the country, making mediocrity the standard and eroding competitiveness. 🔹 Disloyal radicals are being placed in government and corporate positions to push Marxist ideology from within. The goal? Make race and identity politics the new standard, ensuring division, resentment, and decay. 7️⃣ Unleash Chaos & Political Violence The Democratic Party is actively encouraging civil unrest: 🔹 Screaming down opponents in Congress, refusing to allow civil discourse. 🔹 Encouraging mobs at town halls to create the illusion of popular support. 🔹 Pushing for radical protests and violent riots when their agenda is challenged. The objective? Normalize mob rule, voter intimidation, and street activism as acceptable tactics. 8️⃣ Normalize Profanity & Depravity to Degrade Society The left has abandoned civility and morality, choosing instead to embrace vulgarity and degeneracy: 🔹 Elected officials scream profanity in public to appear "authentic." 🔹 Social media is flooded with vile, degrading content while conservative voices are censored. 🔹 Destroying traditional values through hyper-sexualization, woke indoctrination, and attacks on religion. The goal? Lower standards, erase American dignity, and make barbarism the new normal. 9️⃣ Hide Their Agenda with Fake Crises & Manufactured Outrage Whenever the left faces backlash, they create a new distraction: 🔹 Another Trump indictment whenever Biden’s corruption gets exposed. 🔹 A new “racism” scandal to divert from their failures. 🔹 Climate hysteria, pandemics, or emergency declarations to justify crackdowns on liberty. The plan? Keep America permanently distracted, so the real destruction goes unnoticed. 🔟 Slow, Silent Decline Instead of Rapid Restoration The left doesn’t want progress—they want managed decline: 🔹 They are happy to let America decay slowly, as long as they stay in power. 🔹 A weak, demoralized, dependent population is easier to control than a self-sufficient one. 🔹 The ultimate goal is a European-style socialist state, where government controls healthcare, industry, and speech. 🔴 The Final Question: Will Americans Wake Up Before It’s Too Late? The left THRIVES on apathy. They hope you do nothing. They want you distracted, hopeless, and silent. 🔥 But we are not powerless. We can fight back. 📢 Spread the truth. Share this video. Expose their plan. 📌 WATCH THE FULL BREAKDOWN HERE:

Francois Leclerc

24,889 views • 1 year ago

Most Americans have never heard of Reynolds American or their parent company, British American Tobacco, but you know their brands: Camel, Newport, Pall Mall, Vuse, Grizzly, and Natural American Spirit. It’s time to expose them and their woke agenda: • A perfect 100 score on the woke CEI scoring system from the Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response and support for Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response despite HRC supporting child sex changes • Employees with trans flags and allyship signs front and center at pride parades • "Commitment to DEI" throughout their business • A sponsor of Winston-Salem Pride • British American Tob + Reynolds American Inc. lit up their headquarters in pride colors for Pride Month • British American Tob + Reynolds American Inc. separate employees into groups by race and what kind of sex they like to have — 3 groups are noticeably absent from having groups: men, straight people and White people • LGBTQ employee group contributes to company-wide LGBTQ+ education and pushes for more “inclusive” benefits • They even did trans "progress" flag raisings at company sites in this video • BAT sponsored London pride and walked in Tokyo pride • BAT highlighted the story of a trans employee for everyone to read on their site and brag about their support for so called "gender affirming care" • They aim to put "gender affirming care" in their entire global benefits package by 2026 • They even went the extra mile by creating an "allyship guide” for the entire company • Their vape brand Vuse launched the “Be Every You” drag queen ad campaign • Their brand Vuse was recognized at the Unite South Africa Awards for their "LGBTQIA+ affirming work" • Reynolds American literally tracks every promotion by gender and ethnicity • Reynolds American employees do woke unconscious bias training and they have “inclusive leadership” training for managers • Both companies have explicit "goals" (that I see as racial quotas) to increase the hiring of minorities at a higher percentage instead of just hiring based on merit • As part of their quote “progressive programs and policies”, they’ve also instituted gender neutral bathrooms at the company • Reynolds American even brags about creating "safe spaces" as part of their DEI agenda. • British American Tobacco brags on their site that over 16,000 of their employees have undergone “Mastering inclusion” training and in 2024 they launched the “Truly inclusive leaders program” to “further develop DEI mindsets AND BEHAVIORS to Enhance PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND INCLUSIVITY.” • Sponsored a "diversity roundtable" In the words of a Reynolds American executive: "At Reynolds, diversity and inclusion is a thread that runs through everything we do and how we do it, it isn't just a box we're checking or a corporate exercise." Unlike others who try to hide it, at least they’re sort of honest about their activism. In a DEI piece on their website, they explicitly talk about making employees “change agents” for this DEI agenda. British American Tobacco’s CEO Tadeu Marroco reportedly told Reuters that he doesn’t expect to change any of their DEI policies after Trump’s executive orders. Bottom line is this: every time you buy Camel, Newport, Pall Mall, Vuse, Grizzly, or Natural American Spirit, you’re not just buying tobacco — you’re funding a company that’s pushing radical gender theory, transgenderism, pride, DEI, racial hiring targets, and climate change activism. Are you okay with your money supporting this? If not, call out British American Tob + Reynolds American Inc. for their so called "progressive" policies. Both companies and all of the brands they own should immediately end these divisive, racist policies and embrace corporate neutrality. This isn’t hard stuff, just get out of the business of division and identity politics. Be a company for everyone by just making the products you make and providing great service. Save the activism for your personal time. If you agree, tag these brands and tell them to end these crazy policies.
8:12

Most Americans have never heard of Reynolds American or their parent company, British American Tobacco, but you know their brands: Camel, Newport, Pall Mall, Vuse, Grizzly, and Natural American Spirit. It’s time to expose them and their woke agenda: • A perfect 100 score on the woke CEI scoring system from the Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response and support for Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response despite HRC supporting child sex changes • Employees with trans flags and allyship signs front and center at pride parades • "Commitment to DEI" throughout their business • A sponsor of Winston-Salem Pride • British American Tob + Reynolds American Inc. lit up their headquarters in pride colors for Pride Month • British American Tob + Reynolds American Inc. separate employees into groups by race and what kind of sex they like to have — 3 groups are noticeably absent from having groups: men, straight people and White people • LGBTQ employee group contributes to company-wide LGBTQ+ education and pushes for more “inclusive” benefits • They even did trans "progress" flag raisings at company sites in this video • BAT sponsored London pride and walked in Tokyo pride • BAT highlighted the story of a trans employee for everyone to read on their site and brag about their support for so called "gender affirming care" • They aim to put "gender affirming care" in their entire global benefits package by 2026 • They even went the extra mile by creating an "allyship guide” for the entire company • Their vape brand Vuse launched the “Be Every You” drag queen ad campaign • Their brand Vuse was recognized at the Unite South Africa Awards for their "LGBTQIA+ affirming work" • Reynolds American literally tracks every promotion by gender and ethnicity • Reynolds American employees do woke unconscious bias training and they have “inclusive leadership” training for managers • Both companies have explicit "goals" (that I see as racial quotas) to increase the hiring of minorities at a higher percentage instead of just hiring based on merit • As part of their quote “progressive programs and policies”, they’ve also instituted gender neutral bathrooms at the company • Reynolds American even brags about creating "safe spaces" as part of their DEI agenda. • British American Tobacco brags on their site that over 16,000 of their employees have undergone “Mastering inclusion” training and in 2024 they launched the “Truly inclusive leaders program” to “further develop DEI mindsets AND BEHAVIORS to Enhance PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND INCLUSIVITY.” • Sponsored a "diversity roundtable" In the words of a Reynolds American executive: "At Reynolds, diversity and inclusion is a thread that runs through everything we do and how we do it, it isn't just a box we're checking or a corporate exercise." Unlike others who try to hide it, at least they’re sort of honest about their activism. In a DEI piece on their website, they explicitly talk about making employees “change agents” for this DEI agenda. British American Tobacco’s CEO Tadeu Marroco reportedly told Reuters that he doesn’t expect to change any of their DEI policies after Trump’s executive orders. Bottom line is this: every time you buy Camel, Newport, Pall Mall, Vuse, Grizzly, or Natural American Spirit, you’re not just buying tobacco — you’re funding a company that’s pushing radical gender theory, transgenderism, pride, DEI, racial hiring targets, and climate change activism. Are you okay with your money supporting this? If not, call out British American Tob + Reynolds American Inc. for their so called "progressive" policies. Both companies and all of the brands they own should immediately end these divisive, racist policies and embrace corporate neutrality. This isn’t hard stuff, just get out of the business of division and identity politics. Be a company for everyone by just making the products you make and providing great service. Save the activism for your personal time. If you agree, tag these brands and tell them to end these crazy policies.

Robby Starbuck

765,097 views • 1 year ago

It’s no secret that I see Pete Buttigieg as a future president. As a short film producer, I spend hours studying politicians on both sides of the aisle. I cut up and dissect their speeches and interviews. I study their writing and often read books about them and by them. Based on my pragmatic assessment of the political players, it helps shape my thinking of how they play a role in politics for today and the future. Democrats are quite literally lost right now. With the exception of a few voices, it appears the majority of them, despite being elected representatives, seem to be doing anything but represent, and that deeply saddens me. I can assure you, self pity while residing in the political wilderness is not a good look. Great political leaders shine in a hostile environment and right now, Democrats are hardly generating enough light to illuminate a basement. I’ve said many times, Dems have a deep bench of talent, yet they are wandering around the political landscape like a shell shocked soldier on Anzio beach. They are in desperate need of effective leadership. These are times that demand an unambiguous vision. Beyond that, they need someone who can communicate and articulate a proposition for a better tomorrow. For an America in which no family gets left behind. Now before you tell me a gay man would never be elected president. I would point you to think back to 2008 and ask if you believed a black man could achieve the same? Right now, Democrats have handed the House, the Senate, the White House and the popular vote to a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist. So how did traditional thinking go in November? This is a time to be bold and forward thinking. It’s a sad reality that democratic values are now perceived to be toxic to a demographic that has abandoned the Democratic Party. I would simply suggest, no leader can command an army in the modern political battle-space, without being an outstanding communicator and Pete is that man. I hear many of my detractors often say no, but never do they put forward an alternative proposition and candidate. Because so few are stepping up, it’s very difficult to suggest a first team. Until they show us who they are, how can we as activists get behind them? What are we selling? At the moment, the Dem activist space is not about a vision, it’s about attacking fascism. However cathartic that might be, it doesn’t win elections. Right now, the only person who can beat Trump is Trump. There really is no other proposition on the table. On the upside, I do believe the Trump train will leave the tracks. His deeply damaging approach to economic and foreign policy, will definitely not end well. Tariffs are a self inflicted gaping wound. If no tourniquet is applied, it will cause his Administration to bleed out. The bond markets are already firing warning shots which he is ignoring. His narcissism outwardly appears to not allow him to believe that foreign governments do not pay a cent of the tariffs. When you invent an agency for ‘External Taxation’ as a front for a consumer tax on the very people who voted you into power, it demonstrates either a breathtaking level of incompetence, or an act of cynical premeditated deception. Trump’s one hour 40 minutes comedy special last night, was a rambling self congratulatory litany of lies and deceit. Were it not so terrifyingly dangerous, he would receive a comedy award. On the second day of the markets screaming ‘Stop hurting us’, he appears in denial of the potential economic tsunami soon to hit every middle and low income family in America. My friends, we have what seems like an insurmountable task ahead of us. It would be easy to just give up and say ‘I’ll just take care of myself and others are not my problem. But that would mirror exactly who this monster is. I know we are much better than that. This is why people like Pete Buttigieg are important in our fight to liberate America from this stage four cancer that is Donald Trump.
0:55

It’s no secret that I see Pete Buttigieg as a future president. As a short film producer, I spend hours studying politicians on both sides of the aisle. I cut up and dissect their speeches and interviews. I study their writing and often read books about them and by them. Based on my pragmatic assessment of the political players, it helps shape my thinking of how they play a role in politics for today and the future. Democrats are quite literally lost right now. With the exception of a few voices, it appears the majority of them, despite being elected representatives, seem to be doing anything but represent, and that deeply saddens me. I can assure you, self pity while residing in the political wilderness is not a good look. Great political leaders shine in a hostile environment and right now, Democrats are hardly generating enough light to illuminate a basement. I’ve said many times, Dems have a deep bench of talent, yet they are wandering around the political landscape like a shell shocked soldier on Anzio beach. They are in desperate need of effective leadership. These are times that demand an unambiguous vision. Beyond that, they need someone who can communicate and articulate a proposition for a better tomorrow. For an America in which no family gets left behind. Now before you tell me a gay man would never be elected president. I would point you to think back to 2008 and ask if you believed a black man could achieve the same? Right now, Democrats have handed the House, the Senate, the White House and the popular vote to a convicted criminal and adjudicated rapist. So how did traditional thinking go in November? This is a time to be bold and forward thinking. It’s a sad reality that democratic values are now perceived to be toxic to a demographic that has abandoned the Democratic Party. I would simply suggest, no leader can command an army in the modern political battle-space, without being an outstanding communicator and Pete is that man. I hear many of my detractors often say no, but never do they put forward an alternative proposition and candidate. Because so few are stepping up, it’s very difficult to suggest a first team. Until they show us who they are, how can we as activists get behind them? What are we selling? At the moment, the Dem activist space is not about a vision, it’s about attacking fascism. However cathartic that might be, it doesn’t win elections. Right now, the only person who can beat Trump is Trump. There really is no other proposition on the table. On the upside, I do believe the Trump train will leave the tracks. His deeply damaging approach to economic and foreign policy, will definitely not end well. Tariffs are a self inflicted gaping wound. If no tourniquet is applied, it will cause his Administration to bleed out. The bond markets are already firing warning shots which he is ignoring. His narcissism outwardly appears to not allow him to believe that foreign governments do not pay a cent of the tariffs. When you invent an agency for ‘External Taxation’ as a front for a consumer tax on the very people who voted you into power, it demonstrates either a breathtaking level of incompetence, or an act of cynical premeditated deception. Trump’s one hour 40 minutes comedy special last night, was a rambling self congratulatory litany of lies and deceit. Were it not so terrifyingly dangerous, he would receive a comedy award. On the second day of the markets screaming ‘Stop hurting us’, he appears in denial of the potential economic tsunami soon to hit every middle and low income family in America. My friends, we have what seems like an insurmountable task ahead of us. It would be easy to just give up and say ‘I’ll just take care of myself and others are not my problem. But that would mirror exactly who this monster is. I know we are much better than that. This is why people like Pete Buttigieg are important in our fight to liberate America from this stage four cancer that is Donald Trump.

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

62,524 views • 1 year ago

Ronald Karauri wants to be Governor of Nairobi. But before asking Nairobi to trust him, he must answer for Kasarani. I am a registered voter in Kasarani Constituency. All the 5 wards tell a painful story. Ruai, Njiru, Mwiki, Claycity & Kasarani. Ruai Ward tells a painful story. Residents drive on broken roads every single day while their MP moves around with a convoy, cameras, hired bloggers and media teams that paint a picture of success many locals say they do not recognize. The people of Kasarani did not elect Ronald Karauri because he belonged to UDA. They elected him as an independent, believing he would put the people above party politics. Instead, they watched him become one of President William Ruto's most loyal allies in Parliament supporting the Finance Bill 2024 and backing political decisions that many of his own constituents opposed. What has that loyalty brought to Kasarani? Have the roads in Ruai been fixed? Has insecurity been defeated? Has the drug menace disappeared? Has the sale of chang'aa and bhang been stopped? Have public services improved? Why is Kirima family still terrorizing residents? For many residents, the answer is painfully clear. The tragedy of modern politics is that some wealthy politicians believe money can replace performance. They think a fortune, a polished campaign and an aggressive publicity machine can erase years of neglect. They mistake branding for leadership and publicity for development. But ordinary Kenyans are not stupid or blind. They know the difference between a social media video and a tarmacked road. They know the difference between a press conference and a functioning hospital. They know the difference between campaign slogans and real development. The people of Kasarani use roads Ronald Karauri does not use. They depend on public services he does not depend on. They experience insecurity he does not experience. That is why their pain rarely becomes his priority. And now he wants to lead the whole of Nairobi. If Kasarani his own backyard still struggles with poor infrastructure, insecurity and neglected neighbourhoods, why should Nairobi believe the same leadership will produce different results? No amount of money can buy a legacy of service. No amount of political loyalty to William Ruto can hide failure. No amount of hired bloggers can cover poor roads & potholes. Visit Njiru and look at the road leading to his office. No amount of media campaigns can silence frustrated residents. Ronald Karauri should first explain why Kasarani has not received the leadership many residents expected before asking millions of Nairobians to hand him the keys to City Hall. Elections are not an auction where the richest bidder wins. They are a judgment on service. And in the end, every billionaire has only one vote just like the mama mboga, the boda boda rider, the teacher, the watchman and the unemployed youth. Money can fund a campaign. Only service earns the people's trust. Thank you Wangui Mwangi Muhoho for your courage and bravery.
1:54

Ronald Karauri wants to be Governor of Nairobi. But before asking Nairobi to trust him, he must answer for Kasarani. I am a registered voter in Kasarani Constituency. All the 5 wards tell a painful story. Ruai, Njiru, Mwiki, Claycity & Kasarani. Ruai Ward tells a painful story. Residents drive on broken roads every single day while their MP moves around with a convoy, cameras, hired bloggers and media teams that paint a picture of success many locals say they do not recognize. The people of Kasarani did not elect Ronald Karauri because he belonged to UDA. They elected him as an independent, believing he would put the people above party politics. Instead, they watched him become one of President William Ruto's most loyal allies in Parliament supporting the Finance Bill 2024 and backing political decisions that many of his own constituents opposed. What has that loyalty brought to Kasarani? Have the roads in Ruai been fixed? Has insecurity been defeated? Has the drug menace disappeared? Has the sale of chang'aa and bhang been stopped? Have public services improved? Why is Kirima family still terrorizing residents? For many residents, the answer is painfully clear. The tragedy of modern politics is that some wealthy politicians believe money can replace performance. They think a fortune, a polished campaign and an aggressive publicity machine can erase years of neglect. They mistake branding for leadership and publicity for development. But ordinary Kenyans are not stupid or blind. They know the difference between a social media video and a tarmacked road. They know the difference between a press conference and a functioning hospital. They know the difference between campaign slogans and real development. The people of Kasarani use roads Ronald Karauri does not use. They depend on public services he does not depend on. They experience insecurity he does not experience. That is why their pain rarely becomes his priority. And now he wants to lead the whole of Nairobi. If Kasarani his own backyard still struggles with poor infrastructure, insecurity and neglected neighbourhoods, why should Nairobi believe the same leadership will produce different results? No amount of money can buy a legacy of service. No amount of political loyalty to William Ruto can hide failure. No amount of hired bloggers can cover poor roads & potholes. Visit Njiru and look at the road leading to his office. No amount of media campaigns can silence frustrated residents. Ronald Karauri should first explain why Kasarani has not received the leadership many residents expected before asking millions of Nairobians to hand him the keys to City Hall. Elections are not an auction where the richest bidder wins. They are a judgment on service. And in the end, every billionaire has only one vote just like the mama mboga, the boda boda rider, the teacher, the watchman and the unemployed youth. Money can fund a campaign. Only service earns the people's trust. Thank you Wangui Mwangi Muhoho for your courage and bravery.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

31,173 views • 1 month ago

Democrats are moderating in anticipation of the midterm elections, according to many analysts. The New Democrat Coalition, a large center-left bloc of Democrats in the House, urged the party last week to adopt a “more moderate approach” focused on affordability and economic anxiety rather than “splashy populist promises.” Third Way, a center-left think tank, published polling last week showing that 55% of young men want the Democratic Party to become more moderate, while just 30% want it to move further left. In 2024, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez removed the pronouns from her bio. After the 2024 elections, Gavin Newsom criticized trans-identifying men being allowed to compete in women’s sports. And, over the last three days, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, in separate events, urged Democrats to moderate on immigration, homelessness, and “virtue signaling.” But the analysts are wrong. On most of their major issues, Democrats remain wedded to the same agenda that lost them control of the White House in 2024. Clinton invited a trans-identified congressman, Sarah McBride (D-DE), to participate on her panel, “Girls Just Want to Have Fundamental Rights,” at the Munich meeting, despite overwhelming voter opposition to trans-identified males in female sport and trans medicine for minors. Newsom backed away from his criticism of males in female sports shortly after making it, and his hand-picked Attorney General sued the Trump administration to allow it to continue. During the House hearing on a bill to ban males from women’s sports, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said, “Bigoted folks love this bill. Assaulters love this bill.” Obama, in an interview, framed climate change as apocalyptic and proposed green jobs as the solution, which is identical to his framing in 2007, saying “We believe in government as a tool for good, as a potential force to create more jobs, and as a way to make sure that the planet doesn’t roast, to make sure that as we move forward and the economy grows, that everybody and not just some, are benefiting.” As for the New Democrats and Third Way, they have been making the same arguments for the last 20 years, a period during which the Democrats became a radical-Left party. It’s true that there are some signs of Democrats moderating their agenda. Democratic Governors Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill, in Virginia and New Jersey, respectively, won office last year running on more moderate agendas. “Spanberger runs what would be considered a more centrist campaign,” noted Obama, “and Mamdani in New York runs an explicitly socialist, grassroots campaign… That can win in New York City. It probably could not win in Virginia. And that’s okay.” He also said, “We’re a nation of laws, we have borders, and we’ve got to figure out an immigration policy that is orderly,” while Clinton said, “It went too far, it’s been disruptive and destabilizing, and it needs to be fixed in a humane way with secure borders.” And Obama on homelessness said, “We should also recognize that the average person doesn’t want to have to navigate around a tent city in the middle of downtown, and that we’re not going to be able to build a working majority… if we simply say, ‘You know what, it’s not their fault, and so they should be able to do whatever they want.’” But continuing radicalism overwhelms signs of reform. Obama said in the same interview, “It is an atrocity that in a country that’s wealthy we have people on the streets,” reinforcing the dominant myth on the Left that poverty, not addiction and untreated mental illness, causes “homelessness” and that more subsidized housing will reduce it rather than make it worse, as it has for the last 40 years. Clinton, on a different panel in Munich, scoffed at a Czech politician after he said, “I think what Trump is doing in America is a reaction to policies that really went too far,” pointing to transgenderism. Both Clinton and Obama addressed only how to carry out mass migration, not whether to do so. This focus on changing words, not policies, is true across the board, with Democrats moderating on rhetoric, not agenda. When Spanberger came into office, she ended the state’s cooperation with ICE and simply framed it as anti-crime rather than pro-migrant. She and Sherrill opted for law enforcement optics, but their agendas are little different from Mamdani’s. Obama, in his interview, gave lip service to free speech, but did not renounce his 2022 call for government censorship of social media platforms. The lack of moderation also goes for race, where Democrats falsely accuse their opponents of racism for opposing mass migration, racial preferences, de-policing black neighborhoods, and reparations. Governor Newsom vetoed bills that would have established concrete financial reparations for black descendants of slaves, but also approved legislation to spend $6 million to research how to verify descendants of enslaved people so a future government can give them benefits. While Democratic leaders deprioritized racial justice as a standalone platform in favor of universal economic themes, namely affordability, there has been no “Sister Souljah moment” where a leader renounces the party’s left wing, as Bill Clinton famously did in 1992. All of this could hurt Democrats’ chances of taking back the House and Senate in the fall midterm elections and of running a moderate agenda in 2028. If there was ever a time to moderate, it was in 2025, and it didn’t happen. Voters aren’t reliably liberal. In fact, where 35% of U.S. adults identify as conservative, 33% as moderate, and just 28% as liberal. “Democrats have little credibility,” sociologist Musa Al-Gharbi told the New York Times last month, “because they have been supporting lots of censorship on everything from insufficiently progressive views on race and gender, to suppressing views on contentious political issues in the name of fighting ‘misinformation’ and more. They and their fellow travelers have spent the past decade lowering standards, defining things like standardized tests as racist (former Rep. Jamaal Bowman famously compared testing to ‘modern day slavery’).” Political scientist Yascha Monk agreed, noting that “while Democrats may temporarily be de-emphasizing some of the rhetoric that made them so unpopular, most voters do not believe that they have had a real change of heart about wokeness or D.E.I. — much less that they have a coherent set of political ideas to fill the resulting vacuum.” In January, a Wall Street Journal poll found that even though voters disapproved of Trump on many issues, including the economy, inflation, and immigration, they still favored Congressional Republicans over Democrats on those issues. “In other words,” wrote Thomas Edsall in the Times, “Trump is in hot water on a wide range of issues, but that has failed to translate into Democratic ascendance, signaling continued wariness and distrust of the party.” Noted another political scientist, “Democrats must de-escalate acrimonious rhetoric, condemn political violence across the country, promote cross-partisan citizen dialogues, town halls, and deliberative forums nationwide, and reframe polarizing media content.” But they haven’t done so. On the contrary. Fifty-five percent of people who self-identified as left of center told pollsters last year it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Donald Trump, and 48 percent said the same about Elon Musk. And 25 percent of people who describe themselves as “very liberal” and 17 percent of people who describe themselves as “liberal” say that it is sometimes justified to resort to violence to achieve political goals. Only 6 percent of people who describe themselves as “conservative” and 3 percent as “very conservative” said the same. That’s a nearly five-to-one difference. So why is that? Why haven’t Democratic leaders and politicians sought to moderate their agendas, and not just their language? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
8:08

Democrats are moderating in anticipation of the midterm elections, according to many analysts. The New Democrat Coalition, a large center-left bloc of Democrats in the House, urged the party last week to adopt a “more moderate approach” focused on affordability and economic anxiety rather than “splashy populist promises.” Third Way, a center-left think tank, published polling last week showing that 55% of young men want the Democratic Party to become more moderate, while just 30% want it to move further left. In 2024, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez removed the pronouns from her bio. After the 2024 elections, Gavin Newsom criticized trans-identifying men being allowed to compete in women’s sports. And, over the last three days, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, in separate events, urged Democrats to moderate on immigration, homelessness, and “virtue signaling.” But the analysts are wrong. On most of their major issues, Democrats remain wedded to the same agenda that lost them control of the White House in 2024. Clinton invited a trans-identified congressman, Sarah McBride (D-DE), to participate on her panel, “Girls Just Want to Have Fundamental Rights,” at the Munich meeting, despite overwhelming voter opposition to trans-identified males in female sport and trans medicine for minors. Newsom backed away from his criticism of males in female sports shortly after making it, and his hand-picked Attorney General sued the Trump administration to allow it to continue. During the House hearing on a bill to ban males from women’s sports, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said, “Bigoted folks love this bill. Assaulters love this bill.” Obama, in an interview, framed climate change as apocalyptic and proposed green jobs as the solution, which is identical to his framing in 2007, saying “We believe in government as a tool for good, as a potential force to create more jobs, and as a way to make sure that the planet doesn’t roast, to make sure that as we move forward and the economy grows, that everybody and not just some, are benefiting.” As for the New Democrats and Third Way, they have been making the same arguments for the last 20 years, a period during which the Democrats became a radical-Left party. It’s true that there are some signs of Democrats moderating their agenda. Democratic Governors Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill, in Virginia and New Jersey, respectively, won office last year running on more moderate agendas. “Spanberger runs what would be considered a more centrist campaign,” noted Obama, “and Mamdani in New York runs an explicitly socialist, grassroots campaign… That can win in New York City. It probably could not win in Virginia. And that’s okay.” He also said, “We’re a nation of laws, we have borders, and we’ve got to figure out an immigration policy that is orderly,” while Clinton said, “It went too far, it’s been disruptive and destabilizing, and it needs to be fixed in a humane way with secure borders.” And Obama on homelessness said, “We should also recognize that the average person doesn’t want to have to navigate around a tent city in the middle of downtown, and that we’re not going to be able to build a working majority… if we simply say, ‘You know what, it’s not their fault, and so they should be able to do whatever they want.’” But continuing radicalism overwhelms signs of reform. Obama said in the same interview, “It is an atrocity that in a country that’s wealthy we have people on the streets,” reinforcing the dominant myth on the Left that poverty, not addiction and untreated mental illness, causes “homelessness” and that more subsidized housing will reduce it rather than make it worse, as it has for the last 40 years. Clinton, on a different panel in Munich, scoffed at a Czech politician after he said, “I think what Trump is doing in America is a reaction to policies that really went too far,” pointing to transgenderism. Both Clinton and Obama addressed only how to carry out mass migration, not whether to do so. This focus on changing words, not policies, is true across the board, with Democrats moderating on rhetoric, not agenda. When Spanberger came into office, she ended the state’s cooperation with ICE and simply framed it as anti-crime rather than pro-migrant. She and Sherrill opted for law enforcement optics, but their agendas are little different from Mamdani’s. Obama, in his interview, gave lip service to free speech, but did not renounce his 2022 call for government censorship of social media platforms. The lack of moderation also goes for race, where Democrats falsely accuse their opponents of racism for opposing mass migration, racial preferences, de-policing black neighborhoods, and reparations. Governor Newsom vetoed bills that would have established concrete financial reparations for black descendants of slaves, but also approved legislation to spend $6 million to research how to verify descendants of enslaved people so a future government can give them benefits. While Democratic leaders deprioritized racial justice as a standalone platform in favor of universal economic themes, namely affordability, there has been no “Sister Souljah moment” where a leader renounces the party’s left wing, as Bill Clinton famously did in 1992. All of this could hurt Democrats’ chances of taking back the House and Senate in the fall midterm elections and of running a moderate agenda in 2028. If there was ever a time to moderate, it was in 2025, and it didn’t happen. Voters aren’t reliably liberal. In fact, where 35% of U.S. adults identify as conservative, 33% as moderate, and just 28% as liberal. “Democrats have little credibility,” sociologist Musa Al-Gharbi told the New York Times last month, “because they have been supporting lots of censorship on everything from insufficiently progressive views on race and gender, to suppressing views on contentious political issues in the name of fighting ‘misinformation’ and more. They and their fellow travelers have spent the past decade lowering standards, defining things like standardized tests as racist (former Rep. Jamaal Bowman famously compared testing to ‘modern day slavery’).” Political scientist Yascha Monk agreed, noting that “while Democrats may temporarily be de-emphasizing some of the rhetoric that made them so unpopular, most voters do not believe that they have had a real change of heart about wokeness or D.E.I. — much less that they have a coherent set of political ideas to fill the resulting vacuum.” In January, a Wall Street Journal poll found that even though voters disapproved of Trump on many issues, including the economy, inflation, and immigration, they still favored Congressional Republicans over Democrats on those issues. “In other words,” wrote Thomas Edsall in the Times, “Trump is in hot water on a wide range of issues, but that has failed to translate into Democratic ascendance, signaling continued wariness and distrust of the party.” Noted another political scientist, “Democrats must de-escalate acrimonious rhetoric, condemn political violence across the country, promote cross-partisan citizen dialogues, town halls, and deliberative forums nationwide, and reframe polarizing media content.” But they haven’t done so. On the contrary. Fifty-five percent of people who self-identified as left of center told pollsters last year it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Donald Trump, and 48 percent said the same about Elon Musk. And 25 percent of people who describe themselves as “very liberal” and 17 percent of people who describe themselves as “liberal” say that it is sometimes justified to resort to violence to achieve political goals. Only 6 percent of people who describe themselves as “conservative” and 3 percent as “very conservative” said the same. That’s a nearly five-to-one difference. So why is that? Why haven’t Democratic leaders and politicians sought to moderate their agendas, and not just their language? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

58,299 views • 7 months ago

This is in Masvingo’s Chivi district, where schoolchildren and the very elderly have to cross the river through its raging waters. I want to address two things. There is a myth or falsehood that the Zezurus were in power, and now the Karangas are in power to benefit their tribes, it is hogwash. This is nothing more than kindergarten-level political reasoning. When Mugabe was in power, the Zezurus were just as persecuted as the Karangas. Today, Mnangagwa, who is Karanga, is in power, and the Karangas are suffering equally. Job Sikhala who spent two years in prison without having committed a crime is Karanga, Jacob Ngarivhume comes from the heart of Karanga-land in Bikita, yet Mnangagwa has persecuted him for four years. Chivi is in the heart of Masvingo, yet Karanga children are crossing rivers through dangerous waters while Mnangagwa and his family and friends enjoy a life of luxury. Some of Mnangagwa’s runners and cartel members in his criminal syndicates are not even Karanga. Many are white! Those Karangas who are part of the looting machinery are involved not because they are Karanga but because they are his relatives and friends. Mnangagwa’s wife is not even Karanga, yet politicians exploit tribalism to stir emotions and hoodwink unsophisticated voters who are easily excited by such cheap stuff as “Vene Vayo”. This issue is evident in both ZANUPF and the opposition. When someone loses an argument, they often resort to cheap claims like “You support Tendai Biti because he is from Murewa.” This is pure nonsense propagated by political dimwits with nothing meaningful to contribute to our political discourse! Secondly, what we are seeing in this video is a clear manifestation of ZANUPF’s failures. ZANUPF is a political party with all major ethnic groups at the top! People are still crossing rivers through water in 2025, yet Mnangagwa does not even care whether it is the Karangas, Ndebeles, Manyikas, or Zezurus who are suffering. Mnangagwa is more hated in Kwekwe, the Midlands, and his own village in Mapanzure, Zvishavane, than anywhere else in the country. I have been there; I know this. They consistently voted against him from 2000 in Kwekwe which he calls home, until Robert Mugabe had to create a rural seat for him, called Chirumanzi-Zibagwe. So, I say to young Zimbabweans; do not be hoodwinked by ethnic politics from those who insult you, essentially claiming they are eating on your behalf. Almost half of the cabinet today comes from Gutu, that is how Mnangagwa is retrogressive and limited in his world view, breaking the constitution, which states that all regions must be well represented. But I dare you to visit Gutu today and see how backward it is. These political crooks do not even care about their immediate neighbours; they steal public funds and deposit them in Dubai, South Africa, and Mauritius. One senior South African bank executive told me how they had to flag millions of dollars deposited by a Zimbabwean minister. They asked him to explain where the money came from, and when he couldn’t, they closed the account. Yet, if you visit this minister’s constituency in Masvingo, you will weep when you see how the people are suffering. Zimbabweans regardless of their ethnic/tribal affiliation are all suffering, don’t be divided by small minded politicians who pretend to be with you because of where you come from. Ukaona politician akumobiliser on the basis of tribe or attacking people on the basis of their ethnicity, wotoziva kuti mumusoro idende risina chinhu. Let us get Zimbabwe fixed by choosing and supporting progressive leaders not yesterday’s men and women who don’t have an idea of where the world is going!
1:29

This is in Masvingo’s Chivi district, where schoolchildren and the very elderly have to cross the river through its raging waters. I want to address two things. There is a myth or falsehood that the Zezurus were in power, and now the Karangas are in power to benefit their tribes, it is hogwash. This is nothing more than kindergarten-level political reasoning. When Mugabe was in power, the Zezurus were just as persecuted as the Karangas. Today, Mnangagwa, who is Karanga, is in power, and the Karangas are suffering equally. Job Sikhala who spent two years in prison without having committed a crime is Karanga, Jacob Ngarivhume comes from the heart of Karanga-land in Bikita, yet Mnangagwa has persecuted him for four years. Chivi is in the heart of Masvingo, yet Karanga children are crossing rivers through dangerous waters while Mnangagwa and his family and friends enjoy a life of luxury. Some of Mnangagwa’s runners and cartel members in his criminal syndicates are not even Karanga. Many are white! Those Karangas who are part of the looting machinery are involved not because they are Karanga but because they are his relatives and friends. Mnangagwa’s wife is not even Karanga, yet politicians exploit tribalism to stir emotions and hoodwink unsophisticated voters who are easily excited by such cheap stuff as “Vene Vayo”. This issue is evident in both ZANUPF and the opposition. When someone loses an argument, they often resort to cheap claims like “You support Tendai Biti because he is from Murewa.” This is pure nonsense propagated by political dimwits with nothing meaningful to contribute to our political discourse! Secondly, what we are seeing in this video is a clear manifestation of ZANUPF’s failures. ZANUPF is a political party with all major ethnic groups at the top! People are still crossing rivers through water in 2025, yet Mnangagwa does not even care whether it is the Karangas, Ndebeles, Manyikas, or Zezurus who are suffering. Mnangagwa is more hated in Kwekwe, the Midlands, and his own village in Mapanzure, Zvishavane, than anywhere else in the country. I have been there; I know this. They consistently voted against him from 2000 in Kwekwe which he calls home, until Robert Mugabe had to create a rural seat for him, called Chirumanzi-Zibagwe. So, I say to young Zimbabweans; do not be hoodwinked by ethnic politics from those who insult you, essentially claiming they are eating on your behalf. Almost half of the cabinet today comes from Gutu, that is how Mnangagwa is retrogressive and limited in his world view, breaking the constitution, which states that all regions must be well represented. But I dare you to visit Gutu today and see how backward it is. These political crooks do not even care about their immediate neighbours; they steal public funds and deposit them in Dubai, South Africa, and Mauritius. One senior South African bank executive told me how they had to flag millions of dollars deposited by a Zimbabwean minister. They asked him to explain where the money came from, and when he couldn’t, they closed the account. Yet, if you visit this minister’s constituency in Masvingo, you will weep when you see how the people are suffering. Zimbabweans regardless of their ethnic/tribal affiliation are all suffering, don’t be divided by small minded politicians who pretend to be with you because of where you come from. Ukaona politician akumobiliser on the basis of tribe or attacking people on the basis of their ethnicity, wotoziva kuti mumusoro idende risina chinhu. Let us get Zimbabwe fixed by choosing and supporting progressive leaders not yesterday’s men and women who don’t have an idea of where the world is going!

Hopewell Chin’ono

30,635 views • 1 year ago

When you live in a country where women can easily be mobilised to take sticks, sjamboks, and stones to beat up an imaginary evil spirit that is stopping them from finding a husband, the kleptomaniacs in charge of government in that country can rule forever. These are the same people that will go and vote! Our people still believe in utter nonsense!!!No wonder ZANUPF does whatever it wants with reckless abandon. The complex interplay between societal beliefs, manipulation, and political power in Zimbabwe is wild. The fact that some women can be mobilised to participate in such bizarre rituals reflects a deeper issue of superstition and desperation in the face of socioeconomic challenges. Samora Machel, the first president of independent Mozambique, spoke out strongly against superstition, which he saw as a tool of oppression and backwardness that hindered African progress. One of his most quoted lines on the subject is; “Superstition is the religion of feeble minds.” Machel came to Zimbabwe and spoke out against superstitious behaviour and tribalism at a political rally attended by both Robert Mugabe and Emmerson Mnangagwa. He consistently urged Mozambicans and Africans to reject superstitious beliefs and embrace scientific reasoning. He viewed superstition as a colonial legacy used to keep people ignorant and submissive, and he believed that development and liberation required breaking free from such thinking. When a significant portion of a country’s population is preoccupied with supernatural concerns, it creates an opportunity for political leaders to exploit these beliefs and manipulate the masses. That is why ZANUPF works with these bogus prophets so that many remain under the cover of darkness created by these false prophets! This diversionary tactic allows those in power to maintain control while neglecting their responsibilities to address pressing issues such as poverty, corruption, and the crumbling social welfare system. The delusional masses are simply told that it is God’s timing! Today, all these women are preoccupied with looking for husbands instead of asking why there is 95% unemployment, which leaves the majority of men jobless and contributes to broken marriages. It is common sense, isn’t it? As long as people continue to believe in utter nonsense like beating up evil spirits that are supposedly holding them back from getting married, the ruling party can use these superstitions to consolidate its power and avoid accountability. This cycle of manipulation and exploitation not only perpetuates a flawed political system but also hinders overall societal progress. These women should be “beating up” ZANUPF for destroying the economy, not some imaginary evil spirit. Surely, critical thinking is not as common as it should be! How can Zimbabwe develop with such stupidity in huge abundance?
0:58

When you live in a country where women can easily be mobilised to take sticks, sjamboks, and stones to beat up an imaginary evil spirit that is stopping them from finding a husband, the kleptomaniacs in charge of government in that country can rule forever. These are the same people that will go and vote! Our people still believe in utter nonsense!!!No wonder ZANUPF does whatever it wants with reckless abandon. The complex interplay between societal beliefs, manipulation, and political power in Zimbabwe is wild. The fact that some women can be mobilised to participate in such bizarre rituals reflects a deeper issue of superstition and desperation in the face of socioeconomic challenges. Samora Machel, the first president of independent Mozambique, spoke out strongly against superstition, which he saw as a tool of oppression and backwardness that hindered African progress. One of his most quoted lines on the subject is; “Superstition is the religion of feeble minds.” Machel came to Zimbabwe and spoke out against superstitious behaviour and tribalism at a political rally attended by both Robert Mugabe and Emmerson Mnangagwa. He consistently urged Mozambicans and Africans to reject superstitious beliefs and embrace scientific reasoning. He viewed superstition as a colonial legacy used to keep people ignorant and submissive, and he believed that development and liberation required breaking free from such thinking. When a significant portion of a country’s population is preoccupied with supernatural concerns, it creates an opportunity for political leaders to exploit these beliefs and manipulate the masses. That is why ZANUPF works with these bogus prophets so that many remain under the cover of darkness created by these false prophets! This diversionary tactic allows those in power to maintain control while neglecting their responsibilities to address pressing issues such as poverty, corruption, and the crumbling social welfare system. The delusional masses are simply told that it is God’s timing! Today, all these women are preoccupied with looking for husbands instead of asking why there is 95% unemployment, which leaves the majority of men jobless and contributes to broken marriages. It is common sense, isn’t it? As long as people continue to believe in utter nonsense like beating up evil spirits that are supposedly holding them back from getting married, the ruling party can use these superstitions to consolidate its power and avoid accountability. This cycle of manipulation and exploitation not only perpetuates a flawed political system but also hinders overall societal progress. These women should be “beating up” ZANUPF for destroying the economy, not some imaginary evil spirit. Surely, critical thinking is not as common as it should be! How can Zimbabwe develop with such stupidity in huge abundance?

Hopewell Chin’ono

56,142 views • 1 year ago

🐓 When I was a kid, I had a pet chicken named Mr. Happy, who in some ways was my best friend, especially since I'm an only child. 🍽️ One day, my grandma secretly killed him, fed him to me, and lied about it. Though I knew I was eating chicken, I happily did it, thinking it's NOT Mr. Happy. 🐔 To me, each of these chickens is a sentient being like Mr. Happy or our other pets. They too deserve freedom from captivity and exploitation. 🛡️ We'd do anything to ensure the safety and well-being of select animals. We spend a lot on vet bills and go through tough times to ensure their happiness. We don't believe killing them is acceptable, even if they've had a good life. We respect their autonomy and their desire to live without exploitation. 🍗 Somehow, that connection is lost at the dinner table. When I hear people mindlessly ordering "fish" or "chicken" I think about the sentient beings who were tortured and killed. 🌱 As you can gather from my story, like many, I grew up calling myself an animal lover. But through no fault of my own, I was conditioned to eat animals and their products without questioning. It all seemed so normal. 🚫 11 years ago, I finally opened my eyes. I saw my hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance. I stopped eating animals, their milk, or eggs (since all those animals are exploited and killed). 🌍 Since then, I've become passionate about the food system. Consuming animals causes immense pain and suffering. Moreover, it harms us and the environment we all share. And concerning public health, like the increased risk of pandemics such as avian flu, we put each other's lives at risk too. 🛒 I'm sharing this because I have hope. I hope you can see what I saw, what was hidden from us. Grocery stores and restaurants show us pictures of happy animals, labeling them "humane," "cage-free," "organic," "grass-fed," etc., to make us feel better. 😔 Because they know consumers love good news about bad habits. They want us to buy their products and feel good about it. 🤔 For any business, whether small and local or large and global—whether it's McDonald's, Chick-fil-A, Inc., KFC, Burger King, or Whole Foods Market, Chipotle, or Subway®—which do you think they'd prioritize if the well-being of animals conflicts with making a profit? 💰 I'm not an economist, but it'd be a stupid business choice to choose animal "welfare" over profit! Unless it can be used as a marketing tactic to sell more products! That's why these labels don't mean anything. They're just marketing tools. And I know you know it too! 🔍 Indeed I have investigated humane and local farms and what I've seen and learned is that as long as animals are objectified to make profit and run a business, they are abused and killed in one way or another. 🙏 My friend: I need your help. I need you to make the connection, and do so quickly. I need you to see these animals as the sentient beings they are. I need you to have the courage to stand up against societal norms when they're wrong and harmful. I need you to join me in not supporting this broken food system. And I need your voice to speak up, educate others, and help me fix this cruel and unjust system. ✊ Yes, some people will troll, dismiss, or be triggered. But I'm writing this because I still have hope that YOU reading this can understand me and join me. 👀 If you ever have doubts, join Animal Save Movement and see those animals coming from all those happy, humane, and local farms. Look into their eyes. Imagine yourself or your pets in their place. What have they done to deserve this? What have they done to not deserve our moral consideration and compassion? Is their crime being born in the wrong species, at the wrong place? 🔗 Watch Dominion:
1:30

🐓 When I was a kid, I had a pet chicken named Mr. Happy, who in some ways was my best friend, especially since I'm an only child. 🍽️ One day, my grandma secretly killed him, fed him to me, and lied about it. Though I knew I was eating chicken, I happily did it, thinking it's NOT Mr. Happy. 🐔 To me, each of these chickens is a sentient being like Mr. Happy or our other pets. They too deserve freedom from captivity and exploitation. 🛡️ We'd do anything to ensure the safety and well-being of select animals. We spend a lot on vet bills and go through tough times to ensure their happiness. We don't believe killing them is acceptable, even if they've had a good life. We respect their autonomy and their desire to live without exploitation. 🍗 Somehow, that connection is lost at the dinner table. When I hear people mindlessly ordering "fish" or "chicken" I think about the sentient beings who were tortured and killed. 🌱 As you can gather from my story, like many, I grew up calling myself an animal lover. But through no fault of my own, I was conditioned to eat animals and their products without questioning. It all seemed so normal. 🚫 11 years ago, I finally opened my eyes. I saw my hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance. I stopped eating animals, their milk, or eggs (since all those animals are exploited and killed). 🌍 Since then, I've become passionate about the food system. Consuming animals causes immense pain and suffering. Moreover, it harms us and the environment we all share. And concerning public health, like the increased risk of pandemics such as avian flu, we put each other's lives at risk too. 🛒 I'm sharing this because I have hope. I hope you can see what I saw, what was hidden from us. Grocery stores and restaurants show us pictures of happy animals, labeling them "humane," "cage-free," "organic," "grass-fed," etc., to make us feel better. 😔 Because they know consumers love good news about bad habits. They want us to buy their products and feel good about it. 🤔 For any business, whether small and local or large and global—whether it's McDonald's, Chick-fil-A, Inc., KFC, Burger King, or Whole Foods Market, Chipotle, or Subway®—which do you think they'd prioritize if the well-being of animals conflicts with making a profit? 💰 I'm not an economist, but it'd be a stupid business choice to choose animal "welfare" over profit! Unless it can be used as a marketing tactic to sell more products! That's why these labels don't mean anything. They're just marketing tools. And I know you know it too! 🔍 Indeed I have investigated humane and local farms and what I've seen and learned is that as long as animals are objectified to make profit and run a business, they are abused and killed in one way or another. 🙏 My friend: I need your help. I need you to make the connection, and do so quickly. I need you to see these animals as the sentient beings they are. I need you to have the courage to stand up against societal norms when they're wrong and harmful. I need you to join me in not supporting this broken food system. And I need your voice to speak up, educate others, and help me fix this cruel and unjust system. ✊ Yes, some people will troll, dismiss, or be triggered. But I'm writing this because I still have hope that YOU reading this can understand me and join me. 👀 If you ever have doubts, join Animal Save Movement and see those animals coming from all those happy, humane, and local farms. Look into their eyes. Imagine yourself or your pets in their place. What have they done to deserve this? What have they done to not deserve our moral consideration and compassion? Is their crime being born in the wrong species, at the wrong place? 🔗 Watch Dominion:

Dr. Faraz Harsini

16,302 views • 2 years ago

You haven’t thought this through. (‘Grotesque’) Hamas runs Gaza and is still, unbelievably, quite popular. It is committed - absolutely - to killing all non Muslim Israelis (& many of the Muslim ones too, for supporting Israel). It’s not an idle commitment. We saw what happens when the border is breached - an abomination, an orgy of depravity. I’d love people like you to visit the Nova Exhibition to see for yourself the images and videos taken by the butchers themselves. Then consider whether Israelis (not just the govt which many, many people dislike) are justified in wanting to destroy Hamas. Then… consider how one would do that, given Hamas’s propensity to put their own civilians directly in harms ways for propaganda purposes (see video below as one of many example). It’s extraordinary, but completely consistent, that having built more tunnels than a large city subway, Hamas built precisely zero tunnels to protect civilians. Why do you think that is? Again, watch this video for answers. Every child fatality is appalling. But given Hamas’s meticulously documented tactics, it is a miracle that the ratio of combatant to civilian fatalities is what it is (even using Hamas’s propaganda numbers). Gazans have received more aid per capita than (likely) any people on Earth. They deserve a government that uses that money to build up, not down; to teach their children to thrive, not die. If and when they do, the violence ends and they flourish. And Israelis meanwhile will no longer face that particular existential threat and would likely vote for a very different type of peacetime government, one which would take a very different approach to the ongoing settlements. None of this is simple, despite the implication in your tweets (a staggering one in five of which relate to Israel, as opposed to so many other horrors in the world). But the alternative is perennial violence and misery. Richard I’ve done you the courtesy of replying but I’m certain that even if every single one of your assumptions and prejudices were forensically disproven, your general position & israel obsession would be completely unmoved. Please do visit the Nova Exhibition and then try to do some ‘independent critical thinking’.
0:31

You haven’t thought this through. (‘Grotesque’) Hamas runs Gaza and is still, unbelievably, quite popular. It is committed - absolutely - to killing all non Muslim Israelis (& many of the Muslim ones too, for supporting Israel). It’s not an idle commitment. We saw what happens when the border is breached - an abomination, an orgy of depravity. I’d love people like you to visit the Nova Exhibition to see for yourself the images and videos taken by the butchers themselves. Then consider whether Israelis (not just the govt which many, many people dislike) are justified in wanting to destroy Hamas. Then… consider how one would do that, given Hamas’s propensity to put their own civilians directly in harms ways for propaganda purposes (see video below as one of many example). It’s extraordinary, but completely consistent, that having built more tunnels than a large city subway, Hamas built precisely zero tunnels to protect civilians. Why do you think that is? Again, watch this video for answers. Every child fatality is appalling. But given Hamas’s meticulously documented tactics, it is a miracle that the ratio of combatant to civilian fatalities is what it is (even using Hamas’s propaganda numbers). Gazans have received more aid per capita than (likely) any people on Earth. They deserve a government that uses that money to build up, not down; to teach their children to thrive, not die. If and when they do, the violence ends and they flourish. And Israelis meanwhile will no longer face that particular existential threat and would likely vote for a very different type of peacetime government, one which would take a very different approach to the ongoing settlements. None of this is simple, despite the implication in your tweets (a staggering one in five of which relate to Israel, as opposed to so many other horrors in the world). But the alternative is perennial violence and misery. Richard I’ve done you the courtesy of replying but I’m certain that even if every single one of your assumptions and prejudices were forensically disproven, your general position & israel obsession would be completely unmoved. Please do visit the Nova Exhibition and then try to do some ‘independent critical thinking’.

Zac Goldsmith

48,366 views • 2 months ago

US EMBASSY IN HARARE POSTS BALD TORTURE ALLEGATIONS ON X WITH NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN A RECKLESS MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN U.S. Embassy Zimbabwe U.S. Embassy Harare “As #Zimbabwewelcomes its neighbors for the #SADC summit, the United States affirms its support for SADC's goal to achieve economic development, peace & security. Intimidation, torture & prolonged pre-trial detention of Zimbabwean citizens run counter to these principles,” – posted on X by the US Embassy in Harare on 15 August 2024. COMMENT Where is the evidence? A post like the one above must necessarily refer to attach the evidence of the alleged torture. Otherwise, wherever and whenever interrogation techniques that use torture and the practice of prolonged pretrial or no trial detention are practised; they're wrong, abominable, and unacceptable because they’re inherently inhuman; regardless of who practices them, whom they're practised against or why they're practised. The attached and above referenced post shared by U.S. Embassy Harare on this platform in light of the 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit set for today in Harare is opportunistic, deceitful, and hypocritical self-fulfilling US propaganda, which U.S. Embassy Harare believes should taken for what it claims simply because it's coming from America. At face value, the post purports to affirm US “support for SADC's goal to achieve economic development, peace & security”. But this ‘support’ is neither proven nor apparent, it is merely claimed and asserted. More particularly revealing is that the US affirmation of its purported “support for SADC's goal to achieve economic development, peace & security” is done politically, insincerely, dishonestly and deceitfully; apparently to enable the U.S. Embassy Harare to opportunistically and hypocritically allege - without citing or presenting any iota of evidence – that there’s "intimidation, torture & prolonged pre-trial detention of Zimbabwean citizens"; which the Embassy self-righteously and arrogantly says "run counter to these [Sadc] principles". Since torture is a crime against humanity, allegations thereof should be taken seriously by the relevant authorities wherever and whenever they’re made. For this reason, those who make allegations of torture or any crime against humanity, have a duty and an obligation to backup or support their allegations with evidence that speaks for itself beyond prima facie disputation. The allegations must be substantive, and proven; they should not be mere claims that are asserted arrogantly, politically, opportunistically and hypocritically without any corroborated evidence. Just because the U.S. Embassy Harare is in Harare, which this week is hosting the 44th Ordinary SADC Summit should not cause the Embassy to be so brazenly and arrogantly opportunistic and hypocritical to the reckless point of pretending to be ignorant of indubitable facts about torture and prolonged pre-trial detention in the US and the US support of the worst of the same in apartheid Israel. For example, and for the sake of perspective, three points are important to keep in mind: (i) The US is notorious for keeping 'terrorist' suspects and other accused persons in prolonged pretrial detention within and outside the US — including through rendition—and for 'lawfully' torturing the suspects using despicable and dehumanising techniques like waterboarding and rectal rehydration. (ii) US acts of aiding and abetting the prolonged pretrial and no trial detention, and the rampant dehumanising torture and gruesome murder of Palestinians by apartheid Israel, virtually on an hourly basis across the illegally occupied Palestinian Territories are a matter of documented common cause. (ii) The US has a double-faced posture on torture: on the one hand, it uses torture as its interrogation technique of choice; on the other hand, the US uses torture allegations often with no supporting evidence, as a propaganda weapon to smear and stigmatise targeted countries. Now, given that torture and prolonged pretrial and no trial detention are wrong, abominable, and inhuman wherever and whenever they are practised; and given that the US is notorious for practising torture and prolonged pretrial and no trial detention; and further given that the US is notorious for aiding and abetting torture; cold blooded murder and prolonged pretrial and no trial detention of Palestinians in apartheid Israel; where on earth does the U.S. Embassy Harare derive any moral authority to preach or pontificate about torture and prolonged pretrial detention to SADC Secretariat or to anyone else anywhere in the world, for that matter? The moral question is very important, especially since both the US and Israel routinely justify their dehumanising and gruesome torture techniques on 'legal' grounds; they oxymoronically claim that their torture is ‘legal’. For example, during her Senate confirmation hearings, Gina Haspel - CIA Director under the presidency of Donald Trump from 21 May 2018 to 20 January 2021 - was repeatedly asked by then Senator Kamala Harris, and now the Democratic Party presidential candidate in the November 2024 elections; whether she [Gina Haspel] believed that the CIA’s interrogation [torture] techniques, like waterboarding, were immoral. Haspel repeatedly declined to answer. Tellingly and shockingly, Kamala Harris herself sought to sanitise the CIA’s use of torture interrogation techniques by referring to them as "previous interrogation techniques", falsely presenting them as a thing of the past; and, in any event, outrageously casting them as having been 'legal' but 'not moral'; yet the CIA torture interrogation techniques are illegal because torture is a crime against humanity under international law. Regarding the U.S. Embassy Harare post in question, as a bottom line, there's a critical and urgent need for a better, non-opportunistic, non-holier than thou and more responsible approach for dealing with torture as a reprehensible and unacceptable interrogation technique; than what the U.S. Embassy Harare opportunistically, deceitfully and hypocritically displays on its post. It bears reiterating with great emphasis that what is wrong with the U.S. Embassy Harare post is that it makes serious allegations of torture without providing any evidence of the alleged torture. There’s no evidence at all, save for bald allegations. Somehow, Sadc and everyone else targeted by the US Embassy post is supposed to take and believe the torture allegations purely and only on the basis that the allegations are being made by the US, using the old age trick that if you want to kill a dog, just allege that it has rabies. But, of course experience tells an entirely different story with unassailable proof that the US actually lies routinely, with the indescribably embarrassing case in point being the wildly false 2002 US claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction; which led to the barbaric 2003 US invasion of Iraq to overthrow Hussein with the consequence of literally destroying Iraq. There’s an important background that explains the U.S. Embassy Harare post under the spotlight. In the run up to today’s 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit in Harare, the US Embassy started mobilising its ‘assets’ to get them to make noise that the summit should reactivate the now archived 2023 Sadc Elections Observer Mission (SEOM) report on the 2023 harmonised general elections, hoping to discredit and derail Zimbabwe’s assumption of Sadc chairmanship. ‘Assets’ in this case are individuals linked to opposition political parties, sections of the media and civil society, etc., that the US funds or sponsors to carry out its psychological [propaganda] operations against a targeted country; under the cover of its diplomatic status. In mobilising its ‘assets’ in Harare to orchestrate trouble around the 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit in Harare, the U.S. Embassy Harare took advantage of the unfortunate fact that the state of opposition politics in Zimbabwe today is comatose. Structurally and objectively speaking, there are no opposition parties in Zimbabwe. All there is are some opposition and NGO individuals, among whom the overwhelming majority are seen and treated by the U.S. Embassy Harare as its ‘assets’. Against this backdrop, and working in cahoots with its networks of merchants of regime change in southern Africa which includes the likes of the Oppenheimer funded Brenthurst Foundation, the U.S. Embassy Harare has become the convener and coordinator of its ‘assets’ — whom it let loose and deployed inside Zimbabwe, in South Africa and elsewhere including overseas — in the run up to today’s 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit and used to peddle its torture claims without putting any compelling evidence. With no structured and organised opposition politics, and with a proliferation of one-man and one-woman briefcase NGOs; as is the situation in Zimbabwe today, it has been relatively easy for the U.S. Embassy Harare to use its ‘assets’ [individuals] to peddle its unproven allegations; focussed on today’s 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit, which became a lucrative event for US ‘assets’. The rest is history, yet to be told. Meanwhile, and because torture is a crime against humanity, allegations of torture must not be political or opportunistic propaganda, they must be real and evidential; based on proven and verifiable evidence; especially when they’re made by an entity such as the U.S. Embassy Harare, an embassy of a superpower!
1:18

US EMBASSY IN HARARE POSTS BALD TORTURE ALLEGATIONS ON X WITH NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN A RECKLESS MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN U.S. Embassy Zimbabwe U.S. Embassy Harare “As #Zimbabwewelcomes its neighbors for the #SADC summit, the United States affirms its support for SADC's goal to achieve economic development, peace & security. Intimidation, torture & prolonged pre-trial detention of Zimbabwean citizens run counter to these principles,” – posted on X by the US Embassy in Harare on 15 August 2024. COMMENT Where is the evidence? A post like the one above must necessarily refer to attach the evidence of the alleged torture. Otherwise, wherever and whenever interrogation techniques that use torture and the practice of prolonged pretrial or no trial detention are practised; they're wrong, abominable, and unacceptable because they’re inherently inhuman; regardless of who practices them, whom they're practised against or why they're practised. The attached and above referenced post shared by U.S. Embassy Harare on this platform in light of the 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit set for today in Harare is opportunistic, deceitful, and hypocritical self-fulfilling US propaganda, which U.S. Embassy Harare believes should taken for what it claims simply because it's coming from America. At face value, the post purports to affirm US “support for SADC's goal to achieve economic development, peace & security”. But this ‘support’ is neither proven nor apparent, it is merely claimed and asserted. More particularly revealing is that the US affirmation of its purported “support for SADC's goal to achieve economic development, peace & security” is done politically, insincerely, dishonestly and deceitfully; apparently to enable the U.S. Embassy Harare to opportunistically and hypocritically allege - without citing or presenting any iota of evidence – that there’s "intimidation, torture & prolonged pre-trial detention of Zimbabwean citizens"; which the Embassy self-righteously and arrogantly says "run counter to these [Sadc] principles". Since torture is a crime against humanity, allegations thereof should be taken seriously by the relevant authorities wherever and whenever they’re made. For this reason, those who make allegations of torture or any crime against humanity, have a duty and an obligation to backup or support their allegations with evidence that speaks for itself beyond prima facie disputation. The allegations must be substantive, and proven; they should not be mere claims that are asserted arrogantly, politically, opportunistically and hypocritically without any corroborated evidence. Just because the U.S. Embassy Harare is in Harare, which this week is hosting the 44th Ordinary SADC Summit should not cause the Embassy to be so brazenly and arrogantly opportunistic and hypocritical to the reckless point of pretending to be ignorant of indubitable facts about torture and prolonged pre-trial detention in the US and the US support of the worst of the same in apartheid Israel. For example, and for the sake of perspective, three points are important to keep in mind: (i) The US is notorious for keeping 'terrorist' suspects and other accused persons in prolonged pretrial detention within and outside the US — including through rendition—and for 'lawfully' torturing the suspects using despicable and dehumanising techniques like waterboarding and rectal rehydration. (ii) US acts of aiding and abetting the prolonged pretrial and no trial detention, and the rampant dehumanising torture and gruesome murder of Palestinians by apartheid Israel, virtually on an hourly basis across the illegally occupied Palestinian Territories are a matter of documented common cause. (ii) The US has a double-faced posture on torture: on the one hand, it uses torture as its interrogation technique of choice; on the other hand, the US uses torture allegations often with no supporting evidence, as a propaganda weapon to smear and stigmatise targeted countries. Now, given that torture and prolonged pretrial and no trial detention are wrong, abominable, and inhuman wherever and whenever they are practised; and given that the US is notorious for practising torture and prolonged pretrial and no trial detention; and further given that the US is notorious for aiding and abetting torture; cold blooded murder and prolonged pretrial and no trial detention of Palestinians in apartheid Israel; where on earth does the U.S. Embassy Harare derive any moral authority to preach or pontificate about torture and prolonged pretrial detention to SADC Secretariat or to anyone else anywhere in the world, for that matter? The moral question is very important, especially since both the US and Israel routinely justify their dehumanising and gruesome torture techniques on 'legal' grounds; they oxymoronically claim that their torture is ‘legal’. For example, during her Senate confirmation hearings, Gina Haspel - CIA Director under the presidency of Donald Trump from 21 May 2018 to 20 January 2021 - was repeatedly asked by then Senator Kamala Harris, and now the Democratic Party presidential candidate in the November 2024 elections; whether she [Gina Haspel] believed that the CIA’s interrogation [torture] techniques, like waterboarding, were immoral. Haspel repeatedly declined to answer. Tellingly and shockingly, Kamala Harris herself sought to sanitise the CIA’s use of torture interrogation techniques by referring to them as "previous interrogation techniques", falsely presenting them as a thing of the past; and, in any event, outrageously casting them as having been 'legal' but 'not moral'; yet the CIA torture interrogation techniques are illegal because torture is a crime against humanity under international law. Regarding the U.S. Embassy Harare post in question, as a bottom line, there's a critical and urgent need for a better, non-opportunistic, non-holier than thou and more responsible approach for dealing with torture as a reprehensible and unacceptable interrogation technique; than what the U.S. Embassy Harare opportunistically, deceitfully and hypocritically displays on its post. It bears reiterating with great emphasis that what is wrong with the U.S. Embassy Harare post is that it makes serious allegations of torture without providing any evidence of the alleged torture. There’s no evidence at all, save for bald allegations. Somehow, Sadc and everyone else targeted by the US Embassy post is supposed to take and believe the torture allegations purely and only on the basis that the allegations are being made by the US, using the old age trick that if you want to kill a dog, just allege that it has rabies. But, of course experience tells an entirely different story with unassailable proof that the US actually lies routinely, with the indescribably embarrassing case in point being the wildly false 2002 US claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction; which led to the barbaric 2003 US invasion of Iraq to overthrow Hussein with the consequence of literally destroying Iraq. There’s an important background that explains the U.S. Embassy Harare post under the spotlight. In the run up to today’s 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit in Harare, the US Embassy started mobilising its ‘assets’ to get them to make noise that the summit should reactivate the now archived 2023 Sadc Elections Observer Mission (SEOM) report on the 2023 harmonised general elections, hoping to discredit and derail Zimbabwe’s assumption of Sadc chairmanship. ‘Assets’ in this case are individuals linked to opposition political parties, sections of the media and civil society, etc., that the US funds or sponsors to carry out its psychological [propaganda] operations against a targeted country; under the cover of its diplomatic status. In mobilising its ‘assets’ in Harare to orchestrate trouble around the 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit in Harare, the U.S. Embassy Harare took advantage of the unfortunate fact that the state of opposition politics in Zimbabwe today is comatose. Structurally and objectively speaking, there are no opposition parties in Zimbabwe. All there is are some opposition and NGO individuals, among whom the overwhelming majority are seen and treated by the U.S. Embassy Harare as its ‘assets’. Against this backdrop, and working in cahoots with its networks of merchants of regime change in southern Africa which includes the likes of the Oppenheimer funded Brenthurst Foundation, the U.S. Embassy Harare has become the convener and coordinator of its ‘assets’ — whom it let loose and deployed inside Zimbabwe, in South Africa and elsewhere including overseas — in the run up to today’s 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit and used to peddle its torture claims without putting any compelling evidence. With no structured and organised opposition politics, and with a proliferation of one-man and one-woman briefcase NGOs; as is the situation in Zimbabwe today, it has been relatively easy for the U.S. Embassy Harare to use its ‘assets’ [individuals] to peddle its unproven allegations; focussed on today’s 44th Ordinary Sadc Summit, which became a lucrative event for US ‘assets’. The rest is history, yet to be told. Meanwhile, and because torture is a crime against humanity, allegations of torture must not be political or opportunistic propaganda, they must be real and evidential; based on proven and verifiable evidence; especially when they’re made by an entity such as the U.S. Embassy Harare, an embassy of a superpower!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

54,986 views • 2 years ago

I don’t care about your politics anymore. I really don’t. If you’re still justifying ICE’s actions you’re done. That isn’t a disagreement anymore, that’s a moral failure. The claim that Alex Pretti, a 37 year old ICU nurse, was aggressive or that he was there to kill officers is not just false, it’s evil. It’s a deliberate lie. Kristi Noem repeating it isn’t confusion or poor judgment, it’s a malicious lie. This is the same woman with a documented history of cruelty and dishonesty, and now she’s in charge of Homeland Security. That should terrify everyone! If J.D. Vance and Trump’s team don’t cut her loose, they risk losing their base. This isn’t just Democrats anymore Republican supporters are fed up too. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: no one was ever opposed to deporting illegal immigrants, whether criminals or non-criminals. The justification was always public safety removing people who harm others, who commit violence, who kill. That was the idea! But now the very force that was supposed to protect the public is killing and harming American citizens! At that point, the distinction collapses. If an innocent American is killed, it makes no difference whether the trigger is pulled by a gang member or a federal agent. The outcome is the same: death, fear, and destruction, and I would argue it is even worst when your own is killing. The Trump administration has failed catastrophically with ICE and with Kristi Noem. And let’s be very clear about what’s happening. This is how authoritarianism starts. You give intelligence agencies and private contractors like Palantir powers they should never have and you're doomed. You normalize armed federal agents patrolling American streets. You lie about killings that are caught on camera. Then you label citizens “domestic terrorists” to justify it. First it’s immigrants. Then it’s protesters. Then it’s journalists. Then it’s you. Mark my words. It will be you! We’ve already seen it twice in two weeks. Alex a 37 years old, an ICU nurse at the VA, no criminal record, no violence and he was shot and killed, Just like Renee Good before him. Both were American citizens. Both were immediately smeared by the government as violent extremists. The videos are clear. Alex was filming something every American has the right to do. He approached no one aggressively. He was holding a phone. He was pepper-sprayed for no good reason. His legally carried firearm was removed by ICE. We have second amendment rights in this country, we can exercise them if we want to and honestly - in this American, seems to me we should do it daily! Only after he was disarmed and on the ground did an agent shoot him multiple times, in the back.And yet top officials Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, Greg Bovino went on camera and flat out lied. Not misspoke. Lied. they claimed he was ready to kill ICE officers. This is an attack on American peoples and their rights with bunch of lazy hater in uniforms. If the shooting were justified,they wouldn’t need to fabricate a story, they would not need to make things up.This is what should outrage everyone, regardless of where you stand on immigration or ICE. A government that lies this brazenly. When video evidence is available to anyone is a government that believes it no longer needs public consent to do anything.That is dangerous. There is no democracy in this country but at least we were always able to push back, now we have these people who think they are above the law everywhere. In foreign policy and oil, and in domestic policy too, I bet they’re about to learn their lesson. I’ve spoken to many cops who have pushed back against ICE officers, confronted them, and openly criticized them. Because at the end of the day, cops are regular Americans. They live in our neighborhoods, care about people and public safety, and took an oath to protect. Now they’re defending Americans, standing with them against these brainless haters in uniforms and that is something we should be proud of. As the daughter of a detective, I am extremely proud of these cops who are pushing back and protecting citizens. ICE is unprofessional; they are poorly trained, scared, and operating on hate nothing more. That’s something you see in North Korea not in this country. Enough is enough! Republican especially, should be alarmed. For years, the right warned against armed federal agents patrolling American streets. Waco, ruby ridge, DHS itself was controversial when it was created. The second amendment was defended precisely as a safeguard against government overreach. Here’s the new standard in America: if you are legally carrying a firearm, even if you never touch it, never threaten anyone, never break the law the government can label you a terrorist and kill you. Even if you are an American citizen. And the hypocrisy is staggering. These are the same people who screamed nonstop to free Kyle Rittenhouse, defending the principle that legal firearm possession or use in defence does not equal criminal intent. But now that ordinary Americans who fit that same standard are standing in front of them, they’ve completely reversed course. Suddenly, legal gun ownership is enough to justify lethal force. I’ve always been clear about this: when Trump is right on policy be it domestic or foreign, I give him credit, I support him fully. I’m not driven by blind loyalty so when he is wrong I speak up just as quickly and honestly. But this crosses a line. If the government can kill you for exercising a constitutional right without action, without threat, without due process, then the right itself no longer exists. That is not law and order. That is tyranny. If that’s the rule now, the second amendment is dead. What we are seeing is not law enforcement, it’s power without accountability. And history is very clear about where that road leads. More on my YouTube link in the Bio.
14:19

I don’t care about your politics anymore. I really don’t. If you’re still justifying ICE’s actions you’re done. That isn’t a disagreement anymore, that’s a moral failure. The claim that Alex Pretti, a 37 year old ICU nurse, was aggressive or that he was there to kill officers is not just false, it’s evil. It’s a deliberate lie. Kristi Noem repeating it isn’t confusion or poor judgment, it’s a malicious lie. This is the same woman with a documented history of cruelty and dishonesty, and now she’s in charge of Homeland Security. That should terrify everyone! If J.D. Vance and Trump’s team don’t cut her loose, they risk losing their base. This isn’t just Democrats anymore Republican supporters are fed up too. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: no one was ever opposed to deporting illegal immigrants, whether criminals or non-criminals. The justification was always public safety removing people who harm others, who commit violence, who kill. That was the idea! But now the very force that was supposed to protect the public is killing and harming American citizens! At that point, the distinction collapses. If an innocent American is killed, it makes no difference whether the trigger is pulled by a gang member or a federal agent. The outcome is the same: death, fear, and destruction, and I would argue it is even worst when your own is killing. The Trump administration has failed catastrophically with ICE and with Kristi Noem. And let’s be very clear about what’s happening. This is how authoritarianism starts. You give intelligence agencies and private contractors like Palantir powers they should never have and you're doomed. You normalize armed federal agents patrolling American streets. You lie about killings that are caught on camera. Then you label citizens “domestic terrorists” to justify it. First it’s immigrants. Then it’s protesters. Then it’s journalists. Then it’s you. Mark my words. It will be you! We’ve already seen it twice in two weeks. Alex a 37 years old, an ICU nurse at the VA, no criminal record, no violence and he was shot and killed, Just like Renee Good before him. Both were American citizens. Both were immediately smeared by the government as violent extremists. The videos are clear. Alex was filming something every American has the right to do. He approached no one aggressively. He was holding a phone. He was pepper-sprayed for no good reason. His legally carried firearm was removed by ICE. We have second amendment rights in this country, we can exercise them if we want to and honestly - in this American, seems to me we should do it daily! Only after he was disarmed and on the ground did an agent shoot him multiple times, in the back.And yet top officials Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, Greg Bovino went on camera and flat out lied. Not misspoke. Lied. they claimed he was ready to kill ICE officers. This is an attack on American peoples and their rights with bunch of lazy hater in uniforms. If the shooting were justified,they wouldn’t need to fabricate a story, they would not need to make things up.This is what should outrage everyone, regardless of where you stand on immigration or ICE. A government that lies this brazenly. When video evidence is available to anyone is a government that believes it no longer needs public consent to do anything.That is dangerous. There is no democracy in this country but at least we were always able to push back, now we have these people who think they are above the law everywhere. In foreign policy and oil, and in domestic policy too, I bet they’re about to learn their lesson. I’ve spoken to many cops who have pushed back against ICE officers, confronted them, and openly criticized them. Because at the end of the day, cops are regular Americans. They live in our neighborhoods, care about people and public safety, and took an oath to protect. Now they’re defending Americans, standing with them against these brainless haters in uniforms and that is something we should be proud of. As the daughter of a detective, I am extremely proud of these cops who are pushing back and protecting citizens. ICE is unprofessional; they are poorly trained, scared, and operating on hate nothing more. That’s something you see in North Korea not in this country. Enough is enough! Republican especially, should be alarmed. For years, the right warned against armed federal agents patrolling American streets. Waco, ruby ridge, DHS itself was controversial when it was created. The second amendment was defended precisely as a safeguard against government overreach. Here’s the new standard in America: if you are legally carrying a firearm, even if you never touch it, never threaten anyone, never break the law the government can label you a terrorist and kill you. Even if you are an American citizen. And the hypocrisy is staggering. These are the same people who screamed nonstop to free Kyle Rittenhouse, defending the principle that legal firearm possession or use in defence does not equal criminal intent. But now that ordinary Americans who fit that same standard are standing in front of them, they’ve completely reversed course. Suddenly, legal gun ownership is enough to justify lethal force. I’ve always been clear about this: when Trump is right on policy be it domestic or foreign, I give him credit, I support him fully. I’m not driven by blind loyalty so when he is wrong I speak up just as quickly and honestly. But this crosses a line. If the government can kill you for exercising a constitutional right without action, without threat, without due process, then the right itself no longer exists. That is not law and order. That is tyranny. If that’s the rule now, the second amendment is dead. What we are seeing is not law enforcement, it’s power without accountability. And history is very clear about where that road leads. More on my YouTube link in the Bio.

ELIZABETH LANE

50,363 views • 7 months ago

The Line They Will Not Cross There is a simple reason GB News, for all its boldness, goes no further. They now echo my language of clans, organised crime groups, national coordination and institutional obstruction. But they still refuse to interview me to evidence the final implication of this framework. That refusal is not personal. It is structural. GB News will platform survivors describing abuse. Whistleblowers explaining how they were blocked. Journalists mapping routes, patterns, and failures. All of this is safe. All of it fits a story in which the system eventually corrects itself through exposure, pressure, and inquiry. What they will not platform is the explanation that closes the loop. Which is why I am never interviewed. Because once you accept that these were clan-based organised crime groups operating nationally, persisting despite intelligence, warnings, and exposure, a third strand becomes unavoidable - political representation and protection. Not politics as rhetoric. Not tone or messaging. Politics as an operational layer. That means identifiable interfaces where clan loyalty, criminal proximity, and formal political legitimacy overlap. Individuals whose family networks intersect with organised crime. Party and council structures that treated exposure as destabilisation rather than justice. Repeated, predictable interventions that ensured the cover up was covered up. At that point, the story changes. It is no longer institutional failure. It is organised protection. Once that line is crossed, the safe narrative collapses. Public inquiries stop looking like resolution and start looking like containment. Journalism changes too. It stops asking what went wrong and starts asking who ensured it did not go right. That is the line GB News will not cross. Which is why the language is echoed but the conclusion removed. Why “networks” are discussed but cartels avoided. Why politicians are criticised rhetorically but never operationally. Why figures such as Keir Starmer are attacked for words spoken, not for the political structures that benefited from what took place. Interview someone like me who follows the logic through and that boundary disappears. The audience would be forced to ask who intervened, who benefited, and why enforcement failed so consistently despite knowledge. The narrative cannot survive those questions. The refusal is not an oversight. It is confirmation. It marks the limit of acceptable truth, beyond which this stops being a story about crime or safeguarding and becomes a story about power protecting itself. Until that final strand is confronted, the public will keep being offered a story that sounds radical, feels brave, and stops just short of the only explanation that fits the evidence. But the public is no longer so easily managed by partial truth. People recognise the pattern. The careful language. The point where the story always stops. They know the difference between exposure and explanation. And once they see where the truth is cut off, containment stops working. _________ We are not where we are by accident. We will not get where we need to be if we leave it to those that were part of the cover up to deliver justice. Stand with me. I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe or support here: 🔴 If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE
2:10

The Line They Will Not Cross There is a simple reason GB News, for all its boldness, goes no further. They now echo my language of clans, organised crime groups, national coordination and institutional obstruction. But they still refuse to interview me to evidence the final implication of this framework. That refusal is not personal. It is structural. GB News will platform survivors describing abuse. Whistleblowers explaining how they were blocked. Journalists mapping routes, patterns, and failures. All of this is safe. All of it fits a story in which the system eventually corrects itself through exposure, pressure, and inquiry. What they will not platform is the explanation that closes the loop. Which is why I am never interviewed. Because once you accept that these were clan-based organised crime groups operating nationally, persisting despite intelligence, warnings, and exposure, a third strand becomes unavoidable - political representation and protection. Not politics as rhetoric. Not tone or messaging. Politics as an operational layer. That means identifiable interfaces where clan loyalty, criminal proximity, and formal political legitimacy overlap. Individuals whose family networks intersect with organised crime. Party and council structures that treated exposure as destabilisation rather than justice. Repeated, predictable interventions that ensured the cover up was covered up. At that point, the story changes. It is no longer institutional failure. It is organised protection. Once that line is crossed, the safe narrative collapses. Public inquiries stop looking like resolution and start looking like containment. Journalism changes too. It stops asking what went wrong and starts asking who ensured it did not go right. That is the line GB News will not cross. Which is why the language is echoed but the conclusion removed. Why “networks” are discussed but cartels avoided. Why politicians are criticised rhetorically but never operationally. Why figures such as Keir Starmer are attacked for words spoken, not for the political structures that benefited from what took place. Interview someone like me who follows the logic through and that boundary disappears. The audience would be forced to ask who intervened, who benefited, and why enforcement failed so consistently despite knowledge. The narrative cannot survive those questions. The refusal is not an oversight. It is confirmation. It marks the limit of acceptable truth, beyond which this stops being a story about crime or safeguarding and becomes a story about power protecting itself. Until that final strand is confronted, the public will keep being offered a story that sounds radical, feels brave, and stops just short of the only explanation that fits the evidence. But the public is no longer so easily managed by partial truth. People recognise the pattern. The careful language. The point where the story always stops. They know the difference between exposure and explanation. And once they see where the truth is cut off, containment stops working. _________ We are not where we are by accident. We will not get where we need to be if we leave it to those that were part of the cover up to deliver justice. Stand with me. I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe or support here: 🔴 If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

93,759 views • 8 months ago