Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Le Bobo’s almost here. Bargain-bin fur, carcinogenic stuffing, hugs that crush harder than debt. Snag yours with OTG Pro at launch.

51,165 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

VEGAS ISN’T DEAD. IT’S BREAKING UP WITH THE GRISWOLDS. 🎰 Three resort CEOs say they’re prepared to keep high-end room rates up—even if that means fewer occupied rooms. That’s the distinction I’ve been talking about: filling every room isn’t the same as protecting the experience. When COVID hit, Vegas discounted rooms to bring people back. That part is documented. From what I saw living here, parts of the Strip started feeling less like an adult Disneyland and more like a bargain-basement free-for-all. Here’s the problem: you can discount a room overnight. It takes years to undo a bargain-basement reputation. My uncle worked directly for Sheldon Adelson. He told me Sheldon’s approach at the Venetian in 1999 was straightforward: raise table minimums to $10, establish a dress code, and actually enforce it. The lesson wasn’t simply “charge more.” It was decide what experience you’re selling—and protect it. People paying for luxury aren’t just buying a bed. They’re buying atmosphere, service, and standards. They don’t want chaos in the lobby. And when you market yourself as the cheapest option long enough, “cheap” becomes the expectation—not a temporary promotion. My read? This is more of the Strip deciding it would rather compete for higher-spending guests than win every bargain-hunting vacation search. That doesn’t make every price increase smart. And it certainly doesn’t make every empty room intentional. But “Vegas costs more than I want to spend” and “Vegas is dead” are two very different statements. As I said before: Vegas didn’t die. Vegas reset. The Griswolds may still want the old deal. These resorts appear willing to let that deal—and some of that business—go. Smart reset, or a dangerous bet on too few big spenders? 👇

Jedi Rich

45,271 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Here’s my analysis on NotPixel Airdrop: - Mining phase: it was entertaining to paint on the canvas alongside with many of you! Personally, I had fun drawing 🧡 together with you, just for fun, no competition. For that I will rate it a ✅ - Earn Launchpool: personally, I think this is great that there’s such a tool, that allows holders effortlessly farm tokens. For me it’s a ✅ - Distribution: the major frustrations has been caused by the overload of the smart contract for Airdrop claim, where the biggest frustrations came from the fact that many were not able to claim their tokens for long (Including me) and watched the price go from $0,5 to $0,8 & to $0,2. Personally, I think that if Airdrop claim was done prior to the launch, it may have been better. For that, I will put a ❌ - Launch: NotPixel decided to launch its PX token only on DEX’es on TON. the price at launch actually was at $0,5-$0,8 however, it shortly went down to $0,2 , causing frustration to the community & making them question “who sold?!” & “why no CEX listings?” Here, it’s important to understand the way Sasha & his team decided that they want to build the project. As they mentioned on X “start from the basics, start from 0.” While many dislike this approach, I personally believe that this is how the launches must be happening. Launch on DEX -> generate traction & volume -> go list on CEX’es -> create more news -> grow more from new ppl joining For that I will put ✅ - Team allocation: while many have speculated that “team sold”. this is completely not true. In fact, team has locked their allocation & it can be verified on chain. Which is ✅ for me. - Future plans: NotPixel will have a big canvas on which you will be able to paint, but this time, with some NFT mechanics & PX token integration. For which it is ✅ to me. Burning: NotPixel plan with the new update also includes a mechanism for Burning, which means that PX token will be deflationary. Which is ✅ - ownership revoked: meaning that PX token supply cannot be increased. Nor any modifications could be made to the smart contract at this point. Which is a big ✅ in my opinion - Community: while many are still frustrated with the current token price on the market, many express desire for token appreciation & further growth. One of the interesting feedbacks I saw on the timeline was “NotPixel forced us all to hold”. Which shows that there are ppl who are not willing to get less than their target. Also many express that they want to see PX on CEX’es. For it to grow even more. ✅ - Holders: as with any Airdrop, many have sold their tokens on the market, the volume also came down a bit. However, what’s interesting is that while ~200k ppl sold, the token still fluctuates between the lowest point $0,13 to $0,26. Which shows that there’s a demand & ppl are accumulating more tokens. Currently PX has 205k holders. Which is a ✅ - BuyBacks: the NotPixel team recently announced the buybacks with the money raised from the NotPixel stickers sale. Which created more support for the price on the market. ✅ - Expectations vs reality: Many community members said that they were expecting price to be above $1 as minimum, many were predicting as high as $10. In reality, the price at launch turned out to be much lower than many expected. Leading to the frustration being expressed on the timeline. Which is understandable. ❌ Conclusion: - Mining phase: ✅ - Earn Launchpool: ✅ - Distribution: ❌ - Launch: ✅ - Team Allocation: ✅ - Future plans: ✅ - Burning: ✅ - Ownership revoked: ✅ - Community: ✅ - Holders: ✅ - BuyBacks: ✅ - Expectations vs reality: ❌ This is not bad execution, not many ppl will be able to pull this off in crypto. No one knows the future, but I chose to believe that Sasha & NotPixel team has a plan. Currently they are not listed on any CEX’es, but I think that Sasha & his team could easily get there. Let’s see what the future holds for us 🙌

Viktor 🧡

44,168 просмотров • 1 год назад