Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Least delusional quant on tiktok

138,792 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

39 Kommentare

Profilbild von scoff manifesto
scoff manifestovor 10 Monaten

very convenient that it looks smooth and identical to a lorenz attractor lol

Profilbild von Node 7709
Node 7709vor 10 Monaten

The attractors aren't nearly this clean with real data. The embedding dimensions are also dynamic. When the market is a strange attractor - it becomes easier to gamble on.

Profilbild von dD
dDvor 10 Monaten

Just buy the stocks and wait nigga

Profilbild von 𒀭ωren
𒀭ωrenvor 10 Monaten

No, if I learned anything from ML it’s that the solution is always to just add another dimension.

Profilbild von .
.vor 10 Monaten

Is quant even worth looking into, I’ve seen their models can’t really predict stocks that strongly.

Profilbild von Richárd
Richárdvor 10 Monaten

Not really. Trading is pretty much zero sum. If you win X$, then that means someone else has lost X$, or 10 ppl lost 1/10X$, you get the idea. The only way to win is to consistently beat other people. This changes when u are a multimillionaire, at least that's what they're telling me

Profilbild von Barrilete Cómico
Barrilete Cómicovor 10 Monaten

@jacklif8 What ?? This is so stupid. Ever heard of companies there are this big things that sell other things and as they sell more things they earn more money and they are worth more.. god dam iq is low on x

Profilbild von Richárd
Richárdvor 10 Monaten

@jacklif8 yeah that's called investing, not trading....

Profilbild von 🏦 Christopher 🇯🇲📣READ PINNED📢
🏦 Christopher 🇯🇲📣READ PINNED📢vor 10 Monaten

@ComicoBarrilete @jacklif8 so if someone sold an asset to me and made a profit then i sold it soon after and made a profit and the value kept going up someone lost?

Profilbild von Richárd
Richárdvor 10 Monaten

Yes? The person you bought it from has lost what you gained. If you didn't buy it from him then he would've made even more profit by selling it later. But more generally, obviously I'm referring to winning/losing in relation to the market average. SP500 is a good proxy, and it's clear it's constantly increasing(naturaly, dips happen). If you underperform the market, then you lose. You would've made more just by following it.

Profilbild von stonderlorger
stonderlorgervor 10 Monaten

I wrote this one evening the most dogwashed FDTD electromagnetism sim, I swear the start of this video looked just like the movement of the particles in my test run, right before everything went to infinity and they started teleporting everywhere at once

Profilbild von Vertox
Vertoxvor 10 Monaten

> This is how high-frequency quants gain an edge. You know it's BS just from this one line.

Profilbild von TheWorldHonoredOne
TheWorldHonoredOnevor 10 Monaten

all this yet still cant predict the market. fuck off

Profilbild von Negentrope
Negentropevor 10 Monaten

The Lorenz attractor is a mathematical model from chaos theory, developed by Edward Lorenz in 1963 to simulate atmospheric convection. It's represented by a set of three nonlinear differential equations that produce a butterfly-shaped graph in phase space, illustrating how tiny changes in initial conditions can lead to vastly different outcomes—the famous "butterfly effect." However, it has nothing to do with quantitative math in finance or trading.

Profilbild von Masroor
Masroorvor 10 Monaten

When physicists get into finance

Profilbild von Anotherdev
Anotherdevvor 10 Monaten

Crazy, stock market is way more complex than a Lorenz attractor.

Profilbild von neurallambda
neurallambdavor 10 Monaten

fake news. and label your axes

Profilbild von Seb
Sebvor 10 Monaten

quants on tiktok crazy, conditioning 5 year olds for the future.

Profilbild von Filoc102948
Filoc102948vor 10 Monaten

If only vol was this noiseless lol

Profilbild von Flo
Flovor 10 Monaten

"This manifold reveals hidden structures in volatility" (Not a manifold)

Profilbild von Christopher R Wright
Christopher R Wrightvor 10 Monaten

This is just a strange attractor... It's not built or even approximated on real data.

Profilbild von bol
bolvor 10 Monaten

53bba5

Profilbild von Chris
Chrisvor 10 Monaten

ah yes, takens embedding theorem.. if only real world data were that smooth and lorenz like*

Profilbild von lucid
lucidvor 10 Monaten

I suspected something like this for a while no joke, cool to see

Profilbild von Open Net Battle Engine
Open Net Battle Enginevor 10 Monaten

solar flare style trading

Profilbild von Sorrow
Sorrowvor 10 Monaten

It's definitely chaotic, not random. He's right about that part.

Profilbild von popicon
popiconvor 10 Monaten

interesting...

Profilbild von Redeem314
Redeem314vor 10 Monaten

My PhD is related to the strange attractors they show. It’s a differential equation that is highly susceptible to initial conditions. Although sometimes you end up with the same result, often it will be an unstable system (chaos) and I imagine that’s the case usually for markets.

Profilbild von Sol-3 Observer
Sol-3 Observervor 10 Monaten

Anything to justify their gambling addiction.

Profilbild von 1st Roboeconomist, End Profit Maxing!
1st Roboeconomist, End Profit Maxing!vor 10 Monaten

Well that's just a strange attractor, not relevant really.

Profilbild von Autonomous🐻
Autonomous🐻vor 10 Monaten

I will be starting a company based around higher dimensional manifold related quantitative analysis. I will also be paying my employees disgusting amounts of money. DM if you want to work for me.

Profilbild von adam
adamvor 10 Monaten

Claude please produce a graphic of a cool spinning mathematical object, make the titles of the graph indicate it’s somehow related to bitcoin. It should be a mathematical object with lots of aura when I add a slowed and deepened brainslop edit audio to it

Profilbild von countercyc
countercycvor 10 Monaten

Just buy all the shitcos you see and wait

Profilbild von mrmouktar 🇺🇸
mrmouktar 🇺🇸vor 10 Monaten

Strange loops 🔂

Profilbild von Nisaacson
Nisaacsonvor 10 Monaten

#PrimeFlux

Profilbild von Faizan
Faizanvor 10 Monaten

No

Profilbild von Boris Bartlog
Boris Bartlogvor 10 Monaten

Someone is doing Fourier analysis with extra steps Again

Profilbild von Messiah Joshua
Messiah Joshuavor 10 Monaten

🔥

Profilbild von Sergey B.
Sergey B.vor 10 Monaten

Don't tell him about PCA

Ähnliche Videos