Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Leave everything else and read this. Time to rip the mask off these pseudo-deshbhakts and expose their dirty game. On June 11, a US strike hit an oil tanker accused of carrying Iranian oil. Three Indian sailors were killed. The entire opposition lost their minds, screaming for "revenge," demanding...

41,898 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Firstly, India not just using but exporting Russian oil to Europe is a curveball for the US oil lobby which is also targeting prime European customers. The very mechanism of keeping oil prices in check through India during the peak of the war, when oil prices were skyrocketing, has now been flipped over its head when oil prices are in control. In such a scenario, India’s contribution to the global oil market is proven, and it continues to help keep prices in check, which means lesser margins for others. In other words, Indian exporters are a variable of their own and are “too much” of a player than “anything Indian” should be in the energy space. Now imagine what happens when India starts drilling its own oil in a big way. Scott Bessent and Peter Navarro’s language regarding “rich families” must also be noted. This is an ill-thought-out yet mischievous attempt to turn a class of Indian exporters against another, giving it a political hue and putting pressure on the Indian leadership by triggering a nonsensical debate—all to get India to submit to their trade demands. Part of this is psychological warfare, a negotiating tactic, digging leverage by upending established understandings. But it’s also a signal to “back off” from the oil export market. For them, India doesn’t get to influence or mark down oil prices without their “permission”. And that message is being hammered through the absurdity of their argument—India can win the narrative with statements countering their logic and explaining that it broke no rules, but they want India to know, that ultimately none of that matters. They make the rules as they go.

Shubhangi Sharma

106,639 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

#WATCH | Mumbai: Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis says, "The 9/11 attack was carried out on the Twin Towers to tell that America's might was in the Twin Towers. Therefore, by attacking the Twin Towers, America's sovereignty was challenged. Similarly, the Taj and Trident weren't just hotels. Mumbai, India's economic capital, was chosen to tell the world that we had attacked India. This attack was on India's sovereignty. This attack was a challenge to us. If we had understood that challenge and perhaps shown the courage of Operation Sindoor, no one would have dared to attack us today. But we didn't show that courage at that time. But after Pahalgam, the Prime Minister stated very clearly that terror and talks cannot coexist and gave our army a free hand. The Indian Army entered Pakistan and eliminated all targets. Pakistan was unable to do anything. In a way, the world witnessed India's strength and capability through Operation Sindoor, and today the world recognises that India is a transformed nation. India is a strong nation." "Pakistan now knows that it cannot defeat India in a direct fight. Therefore, it tries to wage a proxy war, a pseudo-war, and with an explosion in Delhi, it attempts to assert its presence once again. But I am glad that today we have a changed India. India first sensed these things and conducted operations... their intentions were to detonate bombs in every corner of India, and many cities of our country, including Mumbai, were their targets. But when our Indian agencies sensed this and directly attacked them, they demonstrated their presence by carrying out an explosion in Delhi..."

ANI

14,201 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#WATCH | Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh | On death of 3 Indian seafarers in an attack on the Palau-flagged MT Settebello off the coast of Oman and near the Strait of Hormuz, East Coast Fishing Boat Owners Association President, Janakiram says, "But why did the US military attack a commercial vessel?... It is neither an Indian ship nor a military or Coast Guard vessel. What happened to the mutual agreements between the US and India? Diplomatic talks take place every two weeks. Whenever Trump gives an interview or holds a press conference, he refers to PM Modi as his friend. Then, why such attacks on Indians?... Among those killed in the attack was a man from Visakhapatnam who served as the ship's Chief Engineer; the US military killed him as well. His wife, Bhargavi, had called me this afternoon to inquire about her husband's safety. Initially, we believed three Indian sailors were missing—the Oman Coast Guard had rescued 21 sailors—but this has taken a tragic turn for Visakhapatnam. The killing of the chief engineer by the US military is deeply unfortunate. We had thought he was merely missing. We had tried to contact the foreign ministries of Oman and India regarding these three individuals, but later received the news that the US military had killed them... We have requested the Ministry of External Affairs to ensure the safe return of the bodies to the victims' families. We have also appealed to shipping officials and the Ministry of Shipping to help secure compensation for the families of the deceased sailors."

ANI

14,715 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat