Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇱🇧 Lebanon has no functioning government and no working electricity, yet everyone demands it disarm the one force that works. Beirut-based writer Sharmine Narwani, of The Cradle, dismantles the "state within a state" argument with the bluntest possible test: look at what the Lebanese state actually delivers. The country... has run without a functioning government for years. The lights have never reliably worked either way. And the only thing standing between Beirut and invasion is an armed group the state has no way to replace: "Does the country need government? No. But does it need resistance? Yes." The demand to disarm Hezbollah, she argues, collapses on that reality. Until someone actually lets the Lebanese army buy real weapons, the math stays exactly where it is. Sharmine Narwanishow more

Mario Nawfal

3,708,154 subscribers

63,580 views • 13 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇱🇧🇮🇱 One man is deliberately torching the diplomatic agreement that could stop a regional war. Beirut-based writer Sharmine Narwani, of The Cradle, says Netanyahu fast-tracked the Lebanon talks for exactly one reason: to wrench apart the US-Iran MOU before it could take hold. The pattern, she argues, stretches back decades, and even Washington has always known it. Clinton's own White House reached the same conclusion about the man now steering the region toward the brink: "Anytime the guy opens his mouth, he's lying. And it was awful." Thirty years later, nothing has changed, except the stakes. Sharmine Narwani

🇱🇧🇮🇱 One man is deliberately torching the diplomatic agreement that could stop a regional war. Beirut-based writer Sharmine Narwani, of The Cradle, says Netanyahu fast-tracked the Lebanon talks for exactly one reason: to wrench apart the US-Iran MOU before it could take hold. The pattern, she argues, stretches back decades, and even Washington has always known it. Clinton's own White House reached the same conclusion about the man now steering the region toward the brink: "Anytime the guy opens his mouth, he's lying. And it was awful." Thirty years later, nothing has changed, except the stakes. Sharmine Narwani

Mario Nawfal

60,717 views • 13 days ago

🇱🇧🇮🇱 Israel's condition for peace with Lebanon sounds simple: disarm Hezbollah. In reality, it’s one of the most dangerous things Lebanon could attempt. The Lebanese government banned Hezbollah's military wing last month after it opened fire on Israel. It has been extending state authority into the south, doing everything a fragile government can do short of open confrontation, but it still cannot force the issue. Here is why: the last time a Lebanese government moved aggressively against Hezbollah was 2008. Hezbollah responded by taking over West Beirut in days, and the resulting confrontation ended with the government backing down. Lebanon also remembers what a real civil war looks like, one that lasted from 1975 to 1990 and left the country broken for a generation. So when Israel says disarm Hezbollah as a condition for peace, Lebanon hears: trigger a civil war as a condition for peace. Washington described the talks as constructive, but the two sides entered wanting completely different things: Lebanon asked for a ceasefire, Israel refused to discuss one. The question is not whether Lebanon wants to disarm Hezbollah, most Lebanese do, the question is whether doing so causes more harm than good.

🇱🇧🇮🇱 Israel's condition for peace with Lebanon sounds simple: disarm Hezbollah. In reality, it’s one of the most dangerous things Lebanon could attempt. The Lebanese government banned Hezbollah's military wing last month after it opened fire on Israel. It has been extending state authority into the south, doing everything a fragile government can do short of open confrontation, but it still cannot force the issue. Here is why: the last time a Lebanese government moved aggressively against Hezbollah was 2008. Hezbollah responded by taking over West Beirut in days, and the resulting confrontation ended with the government backing down. Lebanon also remembers what a real civil war looks like, one that lasted from 1975 to 1990 and left the country broken for a generation. So when Israel says disarm Hezbollah as a condition for peace, Lebanon hears: trigger a civil war as a condition for peace. Washington described the talks as constructive, but the two sides entered wanting completely different things: Lebanon asked for a ceasefire, Israel refused to discuss one. The question is not whether Lebanon wants to disarm Hezbollah, most Lebanese do, the question is whether doing so causes more harm than good.

Mario Nawfal

48,267 views • 3 months ago

Netanyahu says peace between Israel and a Lebanon is possible but for that to happen, the Lebanese government must carry out its promise to disarm Hezbollah 🇮🇱🇱🇧

Netanyahu says peace between Israel and a Lebanon is possible but for that to happen, the Lebanese government must carry out its promise to disarm Hezbollah 🇮🇱🇱🇧

Visegrád 24

26,494 views • 9 months ago

Lebanon's government wants Hezbollah to disarm as it aims for a state monopoly on weapons. But does it have the political and military power to force Hezbollah to do so? Al Jazeera’s Mohammad explains.

Lebanon's government wants Hezbollah to disarm as it aims for a state monopoly on weapons. But does it have the political and military power to force Hezbollah to do so? Al Jazeera’s Mohammad explains.

Al Jazeera English

16,048 views • 2 months ago

"Iran has played only about 30% of its escalation potential." I spoke to Beirut-based writer Sharmine Narwani, of The Cradle, after her colleague returned from meeting senior Iranian officials at the Ayatollah's funeral. Those officials told her outlet directly: negotiations with the U.S. will not move forward unless the war in Lebanon is FULLY resolved. Not just slowed down. Her read on the Lebanon-Israel deal: it can't hold. The Lebanese government, in her words, is "basically a Vichy government" doing whatever Washington and Tel Aviv ask. She says the deal even contains secret annexes and war crimes exemptions the government can't say out loud. On Israel: nearly 60% of Israelis now view civil war as a real threat, according to a poll The Cradle published. Almost 80% describe the past year as having been "horrible for society." And on Iran's leverage: the Strait still isn't open, the strategic reserves run out in August, and Iran, she argues, hasn't come close to exhausting its options. A fascinating conversation with Sharmine Narwani.

"Iran has played only about 30% of its escalation potential." I spoke to Beirut-based writer Sharmine Narwani, of The Cradle, after her colleague returned from meeting senior Iranian officials at the Ayatollah's funeral. Those officials told her outlet directly: negotiations with the U.S. will not move forward unless the war in Lebanon is FULLY resolved. Not just slowed down. Her read on the Lebanon-Israel deal: it can't hold. The Lebanese government, in her words, is "basically a Vichy government" doing whatever Washington and Tel Aviv ask. She says the deal even contains secret annexes and war crimes exemptions the government can't say out loud. On Israel: nearly 60% of Israelis now view civil war as a real threat, according to a poll The Cradle published. Almost 80% describe the past year as having been "horrible for society." And on Iran's leverage: the Strait still isn't open, the strategic reserves run out in August, and Iran, she argues, hasn't come close to exhausting its options. A fascinating conversation with Sharmine Narwani.

Mario Nawfal

302,396 views • 14 days ago

Question: What about Lebanon? Is Lebanon going to be part of a deal? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Lebanon we’re working on separately. With Lebanon we are engaged now. We have a 45-day ceasefire. We’ve had weekly meetings now and ongoing daily engagements between the government of Lebanon and Israel. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel. The problem is Hezbollah. Just last night Hezbollah put out a statement calling for the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you who you’re dealing with here - by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100% Iranian proxy. And as long as an armed Hezbollah exists, it’s going to be hard to achieve peace in Lebanon because they’re victimizing the people of Lebanon. They’re not just attacking Israel. But we’re working that track with the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. And we’ve made some good progress there - an extended ceasefire, a path forward. We’re going to continue to work on that. Hezbollah is a terrorist group.” Question: "Would it be an understanding that Israel wouldn’t strike Lebanon as part of the deal?” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. So if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood during the ceasefire, and it will be understood beyond that."

Question: What about Lebanon? Is Lebanon going to be part of a deal? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Lebanon we’re working on separately. With Lebanon we are engaged now. We have a 45-day ceasefire. We’ve had weekly meetings now and ongoing daily engagements between the government of Lebanon and Israel. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel. The problem is Hezbollah. Just last night Hezbollah put out a statement calling for the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you who you’re dealing with here - by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100% Iranian proxy. And as long as an armed Hezbollah exists, it’s going to be hard to achieve peace in Lebanon because they’re victimizing the people of Lebanon. They’re not just attacking Israel. But we’re working that track with the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. And we’ve made some good progress there - an extended ceasefire, a path forward. We’re going to continue to work on that. Hezbollah is a terrorist group.” Question: "Would it be an understanding that Israel wouldn’t strike Lebanon as part of the deal?” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. So if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood during the ceasefire, and it will be understood beyond that."

Open Source Intel

59,882 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Lebanon also wants its own "Trump" plan. Charles Jabbour, head of the public information apparatus of the Lebanese Forces party (Christians), actually really likes Trump's ultimatum approach towards Hams: I ask President Trump to set a 72-hour ultimatum for Hezbollah to disarm, dismantle its military infrastructure, and be subject to the Lebanese state - otherwise, there is no way to end this coup (by Hezbollah) against the Lebanese state.

🚨 Lebanon also wants its own "Trump" plan. Charles Jabbour, head of the public information apparatus of the Lebanese Forces party (Christians), actually really likes Trump's ultimatum approach towards Hams: I ask President Trump to set a 72-hour ultimatum for Hezbollah to disarm, dismantle its military infrastructure, and be subject to the Lebanese state - otherwise, there is no way to end this coup (by Hezbollah) against the Lebanese state.

Raylan Givens

19,518 views • 9 months ago

⚡️⭕️ Ahead of tomorrow's cabinet meeting on Hezbollah's weapons, Former Lebanese MP Nasser Kandil nasserkandil challenges the Lebanese Government to say the truth to the people. Is it really about "the exclusivity of the weapons in the hands of the state" ? Or is it actually about destroying and dismantling the weapons ? Lebanon. 1st of August, 2025.

⚡️⭕️ Ahead of tomorrow's cabinet meeting on Hezbollah's weapons, Former Lebanese MP Nasser Kandil nasserkandil challenges the Lebanese Government to say the truth to the people. Is it really about "the exclusivity of the weapons in the hands of the state" ? Or is it actually about destroying and dismantling the weapons ? Lebanon. 1st of August, 2025.

Middle East Observer

52,562 views • 11 months ago

🇱🇧 Hezbollah has rejected the "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon that the Lebanese government agreed to in U.S.-mediated talks with Israel. Under the deal, the Lebanese army would take exclusive control of those areas, shutting out non-state actors and their weapons. The group is refusing any disarmament or limits on its presence, and insists Israel fully withdraw from Lebanon first, along with prisoner releases and reconstruction support, before it halts fire. Writer: Julie

🇱🇧 Hezbollah has rejected the "pilot zones" in southern Lebanon that the Lebanese government agreed to in U.S.-mediated talks with Israel. Under the deal, the Lebanese army would take exclusive control of those areas, shutting out non-state actors and their weapons. The group is refusing any disarmament or limits on its presence, and insists Israel fully withdraw from Lebanon first, along with prisoner releases and reconstruction support, before it halts fire. Writer: Julie

Mario Nawfal

38,217 views • 1 month ago

“The Israeli government has taken ownership of the Holocaust.” Investigative journalist Sharmine Narwani argues that Israel has spent decades claiming to speak for Jews worldwide at the expense of those who reject its narrative. She says the result is that these talking points have been diluted to the point where they no longer carry the weight they once did. Watch the full interview on Sanchez Effect.

“The Israeli government has taken ownership of the Holocaust.” Investigative journalist Sharmine Narwani argues that Israel has spent decades claiming to speak for Jews worldwide at the expense of those who reject its narrative. She says the result is that these talking points have been diluted to the point where they no longer carry the weight they once did. Watch the full interview on Sanchez Effect.

Rick Sanchez

29,254 views • 26 days ago

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam: "I assure you that we have worked to reclaim the decision of war and peace, and the proof is that for the first time since 1969, the Lebanese government, through the Lebanese army and the Lebanese armed forces, has complete operational control over the south of the country. "What he (Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem) is saying is that he will support Iran, but we are not going to allow it at all. We will not let anyone drag the country into a new adventure. We've had enough adventures. We entered the so-called 'Gaza support war'. Its cost to Lebanon was not only high, but it was extremely, extremely high, and no one is willing to expose the country to adventures of this kind anymore."

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam: "I assure you that we have worked to reclaim the decision of war and peace, and the proof is that for the first time since 1969, the Lebanese government, through the Lebanese army and the Lebanese armed forces, has complete operational control over the south of the country. "What he (Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem) is saying is that he will support Iran, but we are not going to allow it at all. We will not let anyone drag the country into a new adventure. We've had enough adventures. We entered the so-called 'Gaza support war'. Its cost to Lebanon was not only high, but it was extremely, extremely high, and no one is willing to expose the country to adventures of this kind anymore."

Open Source Intel

107,104 views • 5 months ago

🇱🇧 Every outside power has an agenda, and Lebanon keeps paying the price. Fmr CNBC Anchor Hadley Gamble breaks down why the Lebanese government can't win against Hezbollah without first being able to feed its own people. "Until the government, the sovereign state of Lebanon can provide something as an alternative to that, then you're going to continue to see a strength behind Hezbollah." Lebanon doesn't have a Hezbollah problem. It has a governance problem. Hadley Gamble

🇱🇧 Every outside power has an agenda, and Lebanon keeps paying the price. Fmr CNBC Anchor Hadley Gamble breaks down why the Lebanese government can't win against Hezbollah without first being able to feed its own people. "Until the government, the sovereign state of Lebanon can provide something as an alternative to that, then you're going to continue to see a strength behind Hezbollah." Lebanon doesn't have a Hezbollah problem. It has a governance problem. Hadley Gamble

Mario Nawfal

57,739 views • 2 months ago

🎥 NEW: Hezbollah expert Amal Saad on the new “framework” between Israel and Lebanon: “I think it’s not an exaggeration to say… it transcends even the Abraham Accords… and it resembles much more closely an alliance treaty… not a proper alliance… [but] an alliance that exclusively actually serves Israel and the authorities, not the Lebanese state.” “It de-centers Israel as the source of the problem… of instability and war… and centers the response to the occupation, the resistance to the occupation, as the central challenge to be confronted.” “What the Lebanese authorities are doing here is calling on Israel, the enemy state according to Lebanese law,an enemy state for decades, to come and help them expunge the resistance from Lebanon.” jeremy scahill | Amal Saad

🎥 NEW: Hezbollah expert Amal Saad on the new “framework” between Israel and Lebanon: “I think it’s not an exaggeration to say… it transcends even the Abraham Accords… and it resembles much more closely an alliance treaty… not a proper alliance… [but] an alliance that exclusively actually serves Israel and the authorities, not the Lebanese state.” “It de-centers Israel as the source of the problem… of instability and war… and centers the response to the occupation, the resistance to the occupation, as the central challenge to be confronted.” “What the Lebanese authorities are doing here is calling on Israel, the enemy state according to Lebanese law,an enemy state for decades, to come and help them expunge the resistance from Lebanon.” jeremy scahill | Amal Saad

Drop Site

88,988 views • 18 days ago

🚩Seven minutes. Watch them before you form an opinion on Lebanon’s next few years, and watch the last two minutes twice. Most people are still arguing about whether Hezbollah will hand over its rockets. Fouad Makhzoumi just moved the conversation to where the outcome was always going to be decided: the money. You do not disarm a militia by counting its missiles only. You disarm it by severing the financing that rebuilds every missile the state destroys. Fouad Makhzoumi’s roadmap goes after both arms at once: military and financial, because one without the other isn’t sovereignty, it’s theater. And Lebanon has had enough theater. From there he does what almost no one in Lebanon does cleanly: he lays out what the Washington table actually needs to succeed, why suspending the 1955 boycott law is a Lebanese national decision and not a foreign concession, and why reform at home has to move in parallel, not after. 🚩Then the part everyone should sit with. Lebanese sovereignty plus the Lebanese people’s interest and American strategic interest are not two competing files. They are one. A security pact with Washington isn’t dependency, it’s the lock that makes reform survivable, so the state that finally moves against Hezbollah isn’t left standing alone the second it does. This is the rare Lebanese voice speaking to Beirut, Washington, and the Gulf in the same breath, and being understood in all three.

🚩Seven minutes. Watch them before you form an opinion on Lebanon’s next few years, and watch the last two minutes twice. Most people are still arguing about whether Hezbollah will hand over its rockets. Fouad Makhzoumi just moved the conversation to where the outcome was always going to be decided: the money. You do not disarm a militia by counting its missiles only. You disarm it by severing the financing that rebuilds every missile the state destroys. Fouad Makhzoumi’s roadmap goes after both arms at once: military and financial, because one without the other isn’t sovereignty, it’s theater. And Lebanon has had enough theater. From there he does what almost no one in Lebanon does cleanly: he lays out what the Washington table actually needs to succeed, why suspending the 1955 boycott law is a Lebanese national decision and not a foreign concession, and why reform at home has to move in parallel, not after. 🚩Then the part everyone should sit with. Lebanese sovereignty plus the Lebanese people’s interest and American strategic interest are not two competing files. They are one. A security pact with Washington isn’t dependency, it’s the lock that makes reform survivable, so the state that finally moves against Hezbollah isn’t left standing alone the second it does. This is the rare Lebanese voice speaking to Beirut, Washington, and the Gulf in the same breath, and being understood in all three.

Bechara Gerges

62,035 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Hillary Clinton just delivered one of the sharpest takes on Israel’s Hezbollah strategy yet : “He has never had, Israel has never had, in as long as I can remember, a government that started out more open to working with Israel to try to disarm Hezbollah. And rather than trying to be… smart about how to build up a Lebanese government for the purpose of disarming and neutering Hezbollah… Israel has been engaged in this bombardment of Lebanon.” She argues Israel missed a real opportunity to weaken Hezbollah from within by leveraging growing local opposition and a more cooperative Lebanese government and that the current approach is counterproductive. Her recent interview with David Remnick: 👇👇

🚨 Hillary Clinton just delivered one of the sharpest takes on Israel’s Hezbollah strategy yet : “He has never had, Israel has never had, in as long as I can remember, a government that started out more open to working with Israel to try to disarm Hezbollah. And rather than trying to be… smart about how to build up a Lebanese government for the purpose of disarming and neutering Hezbollah… Israel has been engaged in this bombardment of Lebanon.” She argues Israel missed a real opportunity to weaken Hezbollah from within by leveraging growing local opposition and a more cooperative Lebanese government and that the current approach is counterproductive. Her recent interview with David Remnick: 👇👇

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

722,842 views • 28 days ago

🇱🇧 Hezbollah's Naim Qassem is turning up the pressure on the Lebanese government. "If this government is incapable of securing sovereignty, then it should step down." - Tells Beirut to walk away from U.S. negotiations: "Then the Americans will come running to you, begging for the agreement themselves" - Questions what the government has accomplished in a year and a half Hezbollah is threatening the Lebanese government from inside Lebanon while Iran negotiates a deal that includes Lebanon's ceasefire as a condition.

🇱🇧 Hezbollah's Naim Qassem is turning up the pressure on the Lebanese government. "If this government is incapable of securing sovereignty, then it should step down." - Tells Beirut to walk away from U.S. negotiations: "Then the Americans will come running to you, begging for the agreement themselves" - Questions what the government has accomplished in a year and a half Hezbollah is threatening the Lebanese government from inside Lebanon while Iran negotiates a deal that includes Lebanon's ceasefire as a condition.

Mario Nawfal

200,902 views • 1 month ago

Key points from my remarks on Al Hadath Channel: The government’s decision is good, but it does not rise to the required level. What is needed is the complete dismantling of Hizballa”s military, security, and financial infrastructure, not merely banning its military and security activities as stated in the government’s declaration. The clear reality is that there is no such thing as a political Hezbollah and a separate military Hizballa ; they are one single entity under one leadership, with the same individuals making decisions in both spheres. The distinction between the two is merely a formal characterization that does not reflect reality. Less than two hours after the decision was issued, hizballa launched drones toward Cyprus, in a direct challenge to the authority of the state, despite being represented in the government. In any state that respects itself, the ministers of a party that openly defies state decisions in practice cannot remain in office; they should be compelled to resign immediately or be dismissed without hesitation. We need actions, not statements. The Lebanese Army must enforce state decisions firmly and without selectivity. Lebanon needs a state with one army and one weapon, under the sole authority of the state. The experience of recent years has demonstrated that weapons outside state control have brought nothing but destruction, and that Hizballa was the first to lead its own constituency and supporters into heavy costs and devastating losses before anyone else.

Key points from my remarks on Al Hadath Channel: The government’s decision is good, but it does not rise to the required level. What is needed is the complete dismantling of Hizballa”s military, security, and financial infrastructure, not merely banning its military and security activities as stated in the government’s declaration. The clear reality is that there is no such thing as a political Hezbollah and a separate military Hizballa ; they are one single entity under one leadership, with the same individuals making decisions in both spheres. The distinction between the two is merely a formal characterization that does not reflect reality. Less than two hours after the decision was issued, hizballa launched drones toward Cyprus, in a direct challenge to the authority of the state, despite being represented in the government. In any state that respects itself, the ministers of a party that openly defies state decisions in practice cannot remain in office; they should be compelled to resign immediately or be dismissed without hesitation. We need actions, not statements. The Lebanese Army must enforce state decisions firmly and without selectivity. Lebanon needs a state with one army and one weapon, under the sole authority of the state. The experience of recent years has demonstrated that weapons outside state control have brought nothing but destruction, and that Hizballa was the first to lead its own constituency and supporters into heavy costs and devastating losses before anyone else.

Fouad Makhzoumi

73,599 views • 4 months ago

STEVE BANNON: I’ve come to the conclusion that Texas is actually the railhead of MAGA, but it’s a purple state by the way the electorate officials run it. REP. BRIAN HARRISON (R): The Texas voter, the men and women who love this country, the 30M people who call Texas home - they are red, but the reality is they think our government matches that. The reality is that Texas people are red , the Texas government is blue. It has been for a long time. So, it’s not really been the elected officials controlling the government, it’s been the entrenched, rich-elite, special interest. President Trump is an existential threat to that and the State of Texas should be a multiplying force; an amplifier for what Trump is trying to do.

STEVE BANNON: I’ve come to the conclusion that Texas is actually the railhead of MAGA, but it’s a purple state by the way the electorate officials run it. REP. BRIAN HARRISON (R): The Texas voter, the men and women who love this country, the 30M people who call Texas home - they are red, but the reality is they think our government matches that. The reality is that Texas people are red , the Texas government is blue. It has been for a long time. So, it’s not really been the elected officials controlling the government, it’s been the entrenched, rich-elite, special interest. President Trump is an existential threat to that and the State of Texas should be a multiplying force; an amplifier for what Trump is trying to do.

Bannon’s WarRoom

96,701 views • 9 months ago

🚨🇱🇧 LEBANON ON THE EDGE, BUT CIVIL WAR NOT INEVITABLE MP Mark B. Daou says while tensions are high, a full civil war is unlikely because Hezbollah cannot portray the confrontation as sectarian when the only armed force facing it is the Lebanese army. He highlights a major political rupture, with ministers aligned with Nabih Berri backing the decision to dismantle Hezbollah’s military wing. Daou argues Hezbollah cannot fight Israel, Syria, and the Lebanese state at the same time, saying the balance of power inside Lebanon has shifted. Mark B. Daou 🇱🇧

🚨🇱🇧 LEBANON ON THE EDGE, BUT CIVIL WAR NOT INEVITABLE MP Mark B. Daou says while tensions are high, a full civil war is unlikely because Hezbollah cannot portray the confrontation as sectarian when the only armed force facing it is the Lebanese army. He highlights a major political rupture, with ministers aligned with Nabih Berri backing the decision to dismantle Hezbollah’s military wing. Daou argues Hezbollah cannot fight Israel, Syria, and the Lebanese state at the same time, saying the balance of power inside Lebanon has shifted. Mark B. Daou 🇱🇧

Mario Nawfal

35,088 views • 4 months ago

The Israeli army destroyed an extensive tunnel in southern Lebanon on Sunday, with Lebanese state media reporting strikes in the area and Iran-backed Hezbollah saying it reserves the right to respond to the attacks. The incidents came despite a trilateral framework agreement signed by Lebanon and Israel under US sponsorship on Friday to pave the way for peace between the two countries and disarm Iran-backed Hezbollah.

The Israeli army destroyed an extensive tunnel in southern Lebanon on Sunday, with Lebanese state media reporting strikes in the area and Iran-backed Hezbollah saying it reserves the right to respond to the attacks. The incidents came despite a trilateral framework agreement signed by Lebanon and Israel under US sponsorship on Friday to pave the way for peace between the two countries and disarm Iran-backed Hezbollah.

AFP News Agency

21,914 views • 21 days ago