Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Left: Ed Sheeran on Instagram, "There is a reason I don't use my professional platform for politics" Right: Except that time Ed Sheeran shot a music video in Kyiv, then did a concert for Ukraine, because, "I just wanted to so something, rather than not do anything" My view follows.
1,938,674 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 11

Please explain to me what you mean when you say 'free Palestine'. Precisely. What does a free Palestine look like to you? Where are its borders? Who lives there? Who is in government? How is that government chosen?

Quite happy to explain precisely what I mean. By a free Palestine, I mean essentially what the UK Government now formally supports and recognises: a sovereign, viable and democratic Palestinian state living alongside a safe and secure Israel, with both peoples entitled to peace, security and self-determination. On borders, the British Government now recognises the State of Palestine on provisional borders based on the 1967 lines, with mutually agreed land swaps to be settled through negotiations — comprising the West Bank and Gaza. On government, the UK position is equally clear: Hamas should have no role in the future governance of Palestine, and the Palestinian state should be led through reformed, democratic Palestinian institutions. So “Free Palestine”, does not mean the destruction of Israel, expelling Israelis, or replacing one people with another. It means Palestinians being free to live in their own sovereign state, alongside Israelis living securely in theirs. This is the formal position of the British Government, which recognises both the State of Israel and the State of Palestine.

I agree. I've asked this question of people who chant Free Palestine I've received a variety of answers. Some want the expulsion or death of all jews from Israel, some also want the expulsion of all Druze & Christians etc. So 'Free Palestine' can have many interpretations.

The variety of answers is why I ask the question. I was in France a while ago & came across a free Palestine demo. I asked 2 guys to explain what they meant by that. In their explanations to me they realised that they completely disagreed on what the chant meant...

I exited stage left & let them argue among themselves. I thank you for your comprehensive answer, which I agree with.

He's pathetic

He's a construct with zero values

Except that he can have an opinion and voice it. He can take part in a concert advertised in support of something. People are all forewarned and have a choice. That’s different to ambushing of the public by another act.

But that rather misses my point. I’m not suggesting Ed should “ambush” an audience with a political speech, or even that he has to say anything about Palestine. I’m questioning his statement that there’s “a reason I don’t use my professional platform for politics”, because Ukraine shows that isn’t an absolute principle. He publicly supported Ukrainians, performed at a benefit concert and explained that he “wanted to do something rather than not do anything”. And I thought that was admirable. Here, a fellow artist has been removed by the promoters after speaking out. Ed doesn’t have to agree with everything Macklemore says, but he could still show some solidarity with an artist losing a platform for expressing his views. That isn’t about ambushing the public. It’s about whether the instinct to “do something rather than not do anything” applies consistently.

Lol there's always receipts!

🙌 That's what I call using your platform for a good cause - and a good excuse for using Instagram 😉

