Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Legacy Media is devoting hour after hour to ramped up propaganda attacks on Elon Musk. MSNBC’s Chris Hayes labels him “Co-President” — says he set $22B "on fire” in order to "turn the social media platform into a right wing propaganda machine." The hysteria here is next level. HAYES:... show more
27,043,226 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
10 Yorum
@elonmusk 83 Billionaires…raises over $1B…left with $20M debt. Thank God Communism lost on Tuesday.
@elonmusk Democrats and legacy media lost. America won 🇺🇸
@elonmusk Funny how the Left doesn’t seem to mind the mountains of money Google, Microsoft, and other big tech donate to the Democratic Party
@elonmusk 83 billionaires.
@elonmusk My favorite part is where they say he set $22B on fire for no reason except “propaganda machine” and then say it made him richer.
@elonmusk About as incoherent as you would expect from low-tier propagandists
@elonmusk .@chrislhayes is a propagandist, a professional liar, who no one will remember when he’s gone. Elon, not so much.
@VetBruce @elonmusk @chrislhayes Fact check: True ✅
@elonmusk This is pure projection. The Democratic Party is basically an oligarchy at this point, run but the Obamas, Clintons, and Pelosis. Chris Hayes might be the most insufferable person at MSNBC and that is saying something with all the stiff competition.
@elonmusk Those oligarchs are (D)ifferent.
![DOUGLAS MURRAY: ELON HAS THE GUTS TO SAY THE TRUTH ON THE SITUATION IN THE UK “Jonathan Freedland of the Guardian [who called for Elon Musk to be arrested], is a very obscure figure. He is not at all known outside a small amount of the left-wing in the UK, but he has the audacity to claim that the British authority should arrest an American citizen. I mean, I don't know if Jonathan Freedman knows his history, I assume he does. He's a relatively intelligent man. But he should know that America fought quite a significant war in order that American citizens would not, in fact, be under the writ of British law. And thank goodness Elon Musk isn't. And thank goodness he has the guts to continue, like a number of the rest of us, to say, what is the truth. The reason you see so much of the media running against Elon Musk at the moment, is they recognize that his platform, Twitter, is beating all of them, or most of them, in all the stakes. And that's very scary for some of these old media who can't keep up, and don't have very many readers, like the Guardian. It's perfectly possible, that people like me, billionaires like Elon Musk, will be able to get through this era and will survive it. And I certainly plan to, and I'm sure and know that Musk does as well. But what about, as you say, the person who does not have the platform that I have or the means that Elon Musk has? What about them? As it's happening all the time at the moment in the UK, police forces that have not solved one burglary in recent years are knocking on people's doors and arresting them for Facebook posts, for retweeting things.” Source: Interview with Douglas Murray on Sky News, August 15, 2024](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1824492995007152270/ext_tw_video_thumb/1824492751246770176/pu/img/0qOprwYdCmUW-ENd.jpg)
![Elon Musk isn't running a 'free speech' platform; he’s running a propaganda machine for the far-right. Watch MEP Alexandra Geese blast the way X and TikTok are being used as weapons of war to divide the Europeans and boost putin’s puppets. She’s 100% right—why do we let these tech bros do things online that would be illegal on any TV station? Massive respect to her for calling out the empty seats in the room, too. Alexandra Geese, German politician and Member of the European Parliament: "putin, Trump and Musk have declared war against you. The destruction of the European Union has been putin’s goal for years. And now, with a national security strategy, Trump has joined the club. And their goals are clear. A weak and divided European continent, a polarized society and far-right parties of power. And I'm looking at every group in this house, except the far-right corner where the putin’s friend sits. And I'm looking at the European Commission. putin, Trump and Musk have declared war against you! They want you out. They want everybody out who fights for democracy. And they have a powerful weapon. And they're using it. Social Media. Elon Musk systematically downranks, that means censors, speech of pro-European political parties, violating our freedom of expression. In turn, he boosts pro-putin parties that want to destroy the European Union. And the evidence from Germany, Poland and UK is overwhelming and we want finally the European Commission to investigate this. And X is not the only one. TikTok force-feeds far-right content to people who do not choose it. Would we tolerate one party getting 80% of the TV space in a democracy? No, we would not! Then why do we accept that social media oligarchs impose this on our citizens in the online world? Why do we accept that the whole business model of social media is hate? Commissioner McGrath [commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection] you just said peace comes from respecting people, not from dividing them. So why do we accept the business model of an information online ecosystem that is built on dividing people? That is built on spreading hate? Colleagues, Commissioner, my constituents are deeply concerned about these attacks on our democracy. They're asking Europe to fight. But the person who could do that today is not even in the room. Executive Vice-President Virkunnen has something more urgent to do than to listen to the concerns of citizens in parliament, and I hope she's not meeting a big tech company. Tyranny requires our fear and our silence. Democracy requires courage and it requires us to speak up. And I'm speaking up. I will not be silent and I'm asking the European Commission to stand up for Europe.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2002796814613799271/amplify_video_thumb/2002796642794196992/img/ip_oyPYMR7D88Y1d.jpg)
![Whitney Webb: "A lot of people forget... the ban on propaganda being used domestically against Americans was lifted under the Obama administration... now with all of this extreme media consolidation by this specific cabal of billionaires and oligarchs, the propaganda is already bad[, and] I would argue... is going to get even worse." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Chris Hedges (Chris Hedges) posted to YouTube on October 22, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's an unprecedented effort of course, to propagandize the American people, to have us willingly walk in and support and consent to these systems being installed, because a lot of people forget. But the ban on propaganda, being used domestically against Americans was lifted under the Obama administration. And now with all of this extreme media consolidation by the specific cabal of billionaires and oligarchs and the, the propaganda is already bad, I would argue, but is going to get even worse to get people to consent to these systems specifically. "And I think a lot of what we're going to see is going to be sort of a repeated trope of what we saw on the War on Terror. We have to give up all of our all of these new freedoms, or all of these freedoms and things like that, because we have to go after Al Qaeda and get them at all costs. But now, you know, 20 plus years later, you have you know, the head of Al Qaeda in Syria being given a diplomat, you know, I don't even know what to call it. It's so ridiculous. Like a red carpet welcome to shake hands with David Petraeus and all of this. "So we lost all of our freedoms, but now Al Qaeda is just, you know, let's, let's shake hands and let them come to the UN while we don't let anyone from Palestine come. I mean it's totally insane. So I think it's quite possible that given that we're seeing this effort to gin up a war on domestic terrorism yet again, we're going to be, given another invisible enemy, and told that we need to give up all of these remaining freedoms and civil liberties to go after the domestic terrorists and that it's going to be, you know, unfortunately a lot of the depravity that we witnessed during the War on Terror, but directed domestically, hence the name domestic terrorism. "And I think you can argue that was always the plan post 9/11. A lot of the stuff was focused domestically. Before 9/11 there were efforts to pass DHS as the National Homeland Security Agency. It stalled in Congress, of course, after 9/11, no longer stalled. And so DHS was created, in a lot of these, you know, security agencies. And the expansion of the national security state in general has also, you know, had a lot of tentacles domestically. "And I think Americans have been naive that a lot of the evil, that that national security, security state has done abroad would never be used against them. And I think that, you know, we need to be very aware of what is going on here, and that the Deep State, if you— whatever you want to call it, is expanding. And it's expanding in the hands of private oligarchs that have a very dangerous political vision that is rarely talked about."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1981420513093378304/amplify_video_thumb/1981418207094132736/img/D5HzPc2lKIc3TgX4.jpg)
