Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

LEGAL FIGHT OVER KEY EVIDENCE INTENSIFIES “I think they're flat WRONG, squarely wrong.” Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ says the court should take another look at the legal standards governing public access as the dispute over a key Lance Twiggs interview continues. Jack Posobiec

18,235 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

‼️EXPOSED: Andrea Burkhart Says Michael Burt Being The COUSIN Of Terrl Farnsworth Is NOT A Conflict Of Interest—Here Is Why She's WRONG! ❌ 👀 Legal "experts" are actively trying to deceive you about the massive conflict of interest in the Tyler Robinson trial. Let’s talk about Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ and the blatant legal sleight of hand she just used to protect defense attorney Michael Burt. Burkhart confidently claims that because Burt is "only a cousin" to Terryl Farnsworth, there is no conflict of interest under Utah law. She is completely misinterpreting the rules to fit a narrative. Here are the facts she left out: The "Close Relative" Strawman: Burkhart points to a narrow clause defining "close relatives" (like spouses or siblings) to dismiss the family tie. But she completely ignores the REAL rule: Utah Rule 1.7(a)(2), which strictly forbids representation if it is "materially limited" by a lawyer's "personal interest." The Ultimate Conflict: Terryl Farnsworth isn't just a distant relative—he is a key witness who was at the scene when Charlie Kirk was murdered. He is the man who allegedly tampered with the crime scene, stood on Charlie's chair, removed the SD card and camera facing the shooter, and trampled the area before police forensics arrived. The Cross-Examination Problem: Michael Burt's job is to ruthlessly defend Tyler Robinson. That means pointing the finger at alternate suspects and destroying the credibility of the state's witnesses. How is Burt supposed to aggressively cross-examine his own cousin about destroying evidence without pulling his punches? He can't. The "Secret Waiver" Lie: Burkhart argues this conflict can just be waived "behind the scenes." In a capital murder trial? Absolutely not. If Robinson is convicted, the very first appeal will be "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel" because his lawyer was protecting a family member. A conflict this staggering has to be addressed on the record in open court. Why are internet commentators running cover for a defense attorney who has to cross-examine his own cousin over a contaminated crime scene? What are they terrified we might find out? ⚖️🧐 CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman - I'd love for you guys to weigh in on this discussion. This is a super important detail that NEEDS to brought up to a larger audience. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. If you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 💪

Project Constitution

18,978 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce