Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🔥 Let’s break this down because you’re weaving together threads that absolutely connect — August 1, tariffs, NESARA, and returning power to We the People. ⸻ 🔹 TRUMP’S AUGUST 1 REMARKS — What did he really mean? When he said: “On August 1, you’re gonna get a lot of...

PaulGoldEagle's profile picture

Paul White Gold Eagle

76,947 subscribers

230,179 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von deerhunter2025107.0
deerhunter2025107.0vor 1 Jahr

Yep here is your August 1st it's time for countries to start paying tariff your not getting any money until all taxes are gone

Profilbild von Johnny
Johnnyvor 1 Jahr

All bullshit! The American people won’t see anything. It’s all going to jew bankers and Israel

Profilbild von ConnectedResearch
ConnectedResearchvor 1 Jahr

I wouldn’t put faith in Nesara, which appeared NOWHERE in any part of Q. Could it happen? Maybe, but doubtful. People are believing this stuff and ruining themselves financially.

Profilbild von Kathleen Zinkel
Kathleen Zinkelvor 1 Jahr

Q talked about Nesara Gesara. President Trump already has new currency & new banking system to avoid the money laundering & fraud. Tariffs are working just like they did before 1871. Med beds are coming out in 2026. It’s The Great Awakening! 🇺🇸👍🏻❤️

Profilbild von 🙏🇺🇸💥🐸 QsAnonGinger777 🐸💥🇺🇸🙏
🙏🇺🇸💥🐸 QsAnonGinger777 🐸💥🇺🇸🙏vor 1 Jahr

Doesn't make sense that any money will come back to us, before full-disclosure happens. These 🙈🙉🙊 idiots refuse to pay attention to anything now, outside of their own comfortable lives. What do you expect they'll do with shit-tons of 💰?

Profilbild von TruePatriot🇺🇸❤️🤍💙
TruePatriot🇺🇸❤️🤍💙vor 1 Jahr

@argosaki Funny how the goal post keeps changing month after month…..

Profilbild von Mobile Scanner
Mobile Scannervor 1 Jahr

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. 👍

Profilbild von 2BorNot2B
2BorNot2Bvor 1 Jahr

I think this is how they’re going to introduce the universal basic income. This way they can sneak it in without the people understanding what it’s really about remember, they’re printing money out of thin air What are they gonna make you do to receive It is the question.?

Profilbild von Petrit Zeneli
Petrit Zenelivor 1 Jahr

I don’t care about the money! I care about the suppressed technologies! Money can wait!

Profilbild von Kay Atwood
Kay Atwoodvor 1 Jahr

Wait, it was July 4 now its been moved again. How about someone admit that NOTHING will happen. Tired of being lied to

Profilbild von nathan lamb
nathan lambvor 1 Jahr

Sure hope so

Ähnliche Videos

“This isn’t a redistribution of wealth. This is an investment in the future.” Trump’s Treasury Department Secretary’s counselor Joseph Lavorgna addresses concerns I have with the 'Trump Accounts' program: “The money is going back into the capitalist system. It’s not consumption. When we think ‘redistribution,’ we’re thinking giving people money to spend. This is money to invest. The only way we’re going to be able to deal with the debt situation is to grow, and to grow fast. It’s a way to build wealth, have a stake in the system and generate policies that are positive for the corporate sector because the corporate sector is the one that hires people, and giving people the American Dream, the ability to reach a higher rung. The cost over a 10-year period is just under $15B. That’s not a lot for a real payoff for people to have an incentive in the system for the US economy to thrive.”
9:11

“This isn’t a redistribution of wealth. This is an investment in the future.” Trump’s Treasury Department Secretary’s counselor Joseph Lavorgna addresses concerns I have with the 'Trump Accounts' program: “The money is going back into the capitalist system. It’s not consumption. When we think ‘redistribution,’ we’re thinking giving people money to spend. This is money to invest. The only way we’re going to be able to deal with the debt situation is to grow, and to grow fast. It’s a way to build wealth, have a stake in the system and generate policies that are positive for the corporate sector because the corporate sector is the one that hires people, and giving people the American Dream, the ability to reach a higher rung. The cost over a 10-year period is just under $15B. That’s not a lot for a real payoff for people to have an incentive in the system for the US economy to thrive.”

Glenn Beck

49,059 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨”A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE BEING ELEVATED BY THE DEVIL”— Christian Artist Dee-1 expounds on success, stating a lot of people are experiencing elevation that is not from God. He goes on to say that if what you’re pushing out into the world glorifies things contrary to the character of God and you’re succeeding…God is not the source of that success! “I DONT WANT TO BE SUCCESSFUL IF GOD IS NOT AT THE FOREFRONT” 👏 #GVStudiosBreaking
0:51

🚨”A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE BEING ELEVATED BY THE DEVIL”— Christian Artist Dee-1 expounds on success, stating a lot of people are experiencing elevation that is not from God. He goes on to say that if what you’re pushing out into the world glorifies things contrary to the character of God and you’re succeeding…God is not the source of that success! “I DONT WANT TO BE SUCCESSFUL IF GOD IS NOT AT THE FOREFRONT” 👏 #GVStudiosBreaking

GodlyVibez Studios

153,667 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Musk suggested that his life could be at risk when he said that he needs to beef up his security. This is because “people who are taking advantage of the government” are going to get “upset” when he and Trump start slashing costs. “If I had full power to take action, I would balance the budget immediately,” Musk said, adding that the government urgently needs to stop spending more than it brings in. “A lot of people who are taking advantage of the government are going to be upset about that, and I’d probably need a lot of security. But it’s got to be done. And if it’s not done, we’ll just go bankrupt.”
2:36

Musk suggested that his life could be at risk when he said that he needs to beef up his security. This is because “people who are taking advantage of the government” are going to get “upset” when he and Trump start slashing costs. “If I had full power to take action, I would balance the budget immediately,” Musk said, adding that the government urgently needs to stop spending more than it brings in. “A lot of people who are taking advantage of the government are going to be upset about that, and I’d probably need a lot of security. But it’s got to be done. And if it’s not done, we’ll just go bankrupt.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

18,339,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!
3:01

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

Summer Cook

22,486 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 WOMAN BREAKS DOWN TRUMP’S $2,000 STIMULUS CHECKS FOR EVERY AMERICAN - AND THE MATH IS WILD “Well, Trump just announced today that he was giving every U.S. citizen who is not a high-income earner a $2,000 dividend check.” “He said, quote, ‘A dividend of at least $2,000 a person, not including high-income people, will be paid to everyone.’” “Where’s the money coming from, you ask? It’s coming from the tariff revenue.” “Is the tariff revenue just us getting our own money back you ask? Yes.” She breaks it down: “$1,300 is the projected extra spending per U.S. household in 2025 versus 2024 due to the tariffs.” “An average household includes 2.5 people, which is $520 extra per person per year.” “Since the checks we’re each getting are $2,000, that means you’re being paid back what you paid into the tariffs plus another $1,480.” And she clarifies: “Just to be clear, this is every person in the household including kids.” “So if you’re a family of four, you’ll be getting $8,000.” Then she finishes with the line that’s making both sides react: “So for all the Trump supporters out there, enjoy. And for all the Trump haters out there, maybe you should donate yours to a charity because surely you can’t take money from an evil, hateful felon.” $2,000 per person. $8,000 for a family of four. Is this an economic plan or a political payoff?
1:18

🚨 WOMAN BREAKS DOWN TRUMP’S $2,000 STIMULUS CHECKS FOR EVERY AMERICAN - AND THE MATH IS WILD “Well, Trump just announced today that he was giving every U.S. citizen who is not a high-income earner a $2,000 dividend check.” “He said, quote, ‘A dividend of at least $2,000 a person, not including high-income people, will be paid to everyone.’” “Where’s the money coming from, you ask? It’s coming from the tariff revenue.” “Is the tariff revenue just us getting our own money back you ask? Yes.” She breaks it down: “$1,300 is the projected extra spending per U.S. household in 2025 versus 2024 due to the tariffs.” “An average household includes 2.5 people, which is $520 extra per person per year.” “Since the checks we’re each getting are $2,000, that means you’re being paid back what you paid into the tariffs plus another $1,480.” And she clarifies: “Just to be clear, this is every person in the household including kids.” “So if you’re a family of four, you’ll be getting $8,000.” Then she finishes with the line that’s making both sides react: “So for all the Trump supporters out there, enjoy. And for all the Trump haters out there, maybe you should donate yours to a charity because surely you can’t take money from an evil, hateful felon.” $2,000 per person. $8,000 for a family of four. Is this an economic plan or a political payoff?

HustleBitch

422,205 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

President Donald Trump is destroying the global economy, according to the media, Democrats, Europeans, and libertarians. The stock market is crashing. His administration is randomly and arbitrarily imposing tariffs, they say. And his tariffs are on the verge of causing a self-destructive global trade war. But policy should not be based on the daily movement of the stock market. The tariffs are not random or arbitrary but instead are based on a publicly released formula. And a trade war will lead to a much better outcome than the path Americans have been on. So says Oren Cass , founder of the think tank American Compass and one of the leading advocates of Trump’s nationalist economic policy. Based on Cass’s resume, one would predict him to be a Never Trump Republican, not a MAGA Republican. He is a Harvard Law graduate who worked at Bain & Company and became the Domestic Policy Director for Mitt Romney at the shockingly young age of 29. Romney, one of the most high-profile Never Trump Republicans, was also highly concerned with China. “I was working on trade policy for him and brought him the very standard, ‘Here's what a Republican says about trade’ starting point. And he said, ‘This is all fine. But what are we gonna do about China?’ “I remember the other economist was like, ‘What kind of question is that? We don't do anything about China.’ Romney was a very non-ideological, pragmatic guy with a business background. He said, ‘That's ridiculous. This is completely broken. What are we gonna do?’ “And I had the privilege of being sent off to find an answer for the candidate, at which point I discovered that the entire right-of-center ideological orthodoxy and the entire economics profession refused to engage with or think about this at all, even though it was a very real problem.” In our conversation, Cass debunked claims that Trump’s tariffs were arbitrary and said they demonstrated bad faith on the part of the people claiming to have debunked them. “My sense is that a deputy press secretary gave a confusing answer to a question,” Cass said. “The US Trade Representative's office has put out a whole detailed explanation of this, with the formula they used and the sources that they used. It's a PDF you can download from the US Trade Representative's website. “If you're somebody whose goal is to just embarrass the administration and confuse people, then you find a confusing statement from a Deputy Press Secretary and say, ‘Oh, see, nobody knows what they're doing.’” Cass pointed to people claiming it was strange for there to be tariffs on small nations. “I think there has been a lot of very bad faith criticism and intentional pretend confusion for the sake of fomenting a narrative among people who should know a lot better,” he said. “One example of this is whatever random island that only has penguins on it that people are upset about. Like, ‘Oh, like why do they have a tariff rate for this island with these penguins on it?’ “The answer is because US trade policy is done through a very formal mechanism called the harmonized tariff schedule, which defines the exact set of territory for which you have to have tariff rates and the exact set of products for which you have to have tariff rates. And it's a very granular set of territories and it does have random islands and so forth as entries on the list. And so if you're going to then announce what the tariffs are by territory, you're gonna have something for the islands on the list, right?” Another piece of misunderstanding Cass was on the idea of “reciprocal tariffs. “There was certainly a communication challenge in calling them reciprocal tariffs,” said Cass, “which people understand to mean ‘Whatever they do to us, we do to them.’ We're sort of holding up a mirror. But there was plenty of messaging for a couple of months leading up to this that what they meant by reciprocal was more like proportional, that it was going to be in relation to the size of the imbalance that we have with the other countries. I wrote a long thing in February walking through what they seem to mean and how it might look.” People are playing dumb, in other words. “They did a like, ‘We just can't figure this out. This must be some crazy mistake.’ It’s people who, politely, are not trying very hard to figure it out and are well-served by claiming it can't be figured out when, in, when in fact it can.” Trump’s tariffs will likely bring back high-wage manufacturing jobs just like Reagan did when he demanded Japanese car companies manufacture in the U.S., explains Cass... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
36:16

President Donald Trump is destroying the global economy, according to the media, Democrats, Europeans, and libertarians. The stock market is crashing. His administration is randomly and arbitrarily imposing tariffs, they say. And his tariffs are on the verge of causing a self-destructive global trade war. But policy should not be based on the daily movement of the stock market. The tariffs are not random or arbitrary but instead are based on a publicly released formula. And a trade war will lead to a much better outcome than the path Americans have been on. So says Oren Cass , founder of the think tank American Compass and one of the leading advocates of Trump’s nationalist economic policy. Based on Cass’s resume, one would predict him to be a Never Trump Republican, not a MAGA Republican. He is a Harvard Law graduate who worked at Bain & Company and became the Domestic Policy Director for Mitt Romney at the shockingly young age of 29. Romney, one of the most high-profile Never Trump Republicans, was also highly concerned with China. “I was working on trade policy for him and brought him the very standard, ‘Here's what a Republican says about trade’ starting point. And he said, ‘This is all fine. But what are we gonna do about China?’ “I remember the other economist was like, ‘What kind of question is that? We don't do anything about China.’ Romney was a very non-ideological, pragmatic guy with a business background. He said, ‘That's ridiculous. This is completely broken. What are we gonna do?’ “And I had the privilege of being sent off to find an answer for the candidate, at which point I discovered that the entire right-of-center ideological orthodoxy and the entire economics profession refused to engage with or think about this at all, even though it was a very real problem.” In our conversation, Cass debunked claims that Trump’s tariffs were arbitrary and said they demonstrated bad faith on the part of the people claiming to have debunked them. “My sense is that a deputy press secretary gave a confusing answer to a question,” Cass said. “The US Trade Representative's office has put out a whole detailed explanation of this, with the formula they used and the sources that they used. It's a PDF you can download from the US Trade Representative's website. “If you're somebody whose goal is to just embarrass the administration and confuse people, then you find a confusing statement from a Deputy Press Secretary and say, ‘Oh, see, nobody knows what they're doing.’” Cass pointed to people claiming it was strange for there to be tariffs on small nations. “I think there has been a lot of very bad faith criticism and intentional pretend confusion for the sake of fomenting a narrative among people who should know a lot better,” he said. “One example of this is whatever random island that only has penguins on it that people are upset about. Like, ‘Oh, like why do they have a tariff rate for this island with these penguins on it?’ “The answer is because US trade policy is done through a very formal mechanism called the harmonized tariff schedule, which defines the exact set of territory for which you have to have tariff rates and the exact set of products for which you have to have tariff rates. And it's a very granular set of territories and it does have random islands and so forth as entries on the list. And so if you're going to then announce what the tariffs are by territory, you're gonna have something for the islands on the list, right?” Another piece of misunderstanding Cass was on the idea of “reciprocal tariffs. “There was certainly a communication challenge in calling them reciprocal tariffs,” said Cass, “which people understand to mean ‘Whatever they do to us, we do to them.’ We're sort of holding up a mirror. But there was plenty of messaging for a couple of months leading up to this that what they meant by reciprocal was more like proportional, that it was going to be in relation to the size of the imbalance that we have with the other countries. I wrote a long thing in February walking through what they seem to mean and how it might look.” People are playing dumb, in other words. “They did a like, ‘We just can't figure this out. This must be some crazy mistake.’ It’s people who, politely, are not trying very hard to figure it out and are well-served by claiming it can't be figured out when, in, when in fact it can.” Trump’s tariffs will likely bring back high-wage manufacturing jobs just like Reagan did when he demanded Japanese car companies manufacture in the U.S., explains Cass... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

505,053 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#BreakingNews | 'Nothing changes. They will be paying tariffs. We will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what it used to be...Prime Minister is a great man. But he was much smarter than the people that he was against, in terms of the United States...We made a deal with India. It is a fair deal. We are not paying tariffs to them and they are paying tariffs. We did a little flip': Donald Trump on trade deal with India Tune in to watch the #Latest update: #RepublicWorld #RepublicTV #RepublicNews #IndiaNews #LiveNews #RepublicExclusive #RepublicWorldLive #ArnabGoswami #RepublicDigital #NationFirst
6:54

#BreakingNews | 'Nothing changes. They will be paying tariffs. We will not be paying tariffs. This is a reversal of what it used to be...Prime Minister is a great man. But he was much smarter than the people that he was against, in terms of the United States...We made a deal with India. It is a fair deal. We are not paying tariffs to them and they are paying tariffs. We did a little flip': Donald Trump on trade deal with India Tune in to watch the #Latest update: #RepublicWorld #RepublicTV #RepublicNews #IndiaNews #LiveNews #RepublicExclusive #RepublicWorldLive #ArnabGoswami #RepublicDigital #NationFirst

Republic

24,154 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Iran and the world are being liberated from Deep State, satanic rule. This is the Great Awakening, the Golden Age of Gesara-Nesara. We are not going to “fix” the old parasitic, satanic, maritime system. We are not simply going to have fair elections and new senators, or simply switch to asset backed currency. We are shifting timelines completely. Money will no longer be an issue. We are being freed from the endless. Endless wars, endless insolvable conflict, endless poverty and sickness. We are moving into a new system, known as Gesara-Nesara. Free energy will be made available to the good people of the earth. Transportation and material possessions will be available to all. Prosperity and peace will rule. We are returning to Divine Rule. To the Constitutional Republic. Our responsibility is to change ourselves. To accept the bounty that is our birthright without fear. To Love, To Create, To Live with joy and freedom. We are ISBEs. Immortal Spiritual Biological Entities. Our children will never be stolen by the hybrids again. Welcome Home ISBEs.
2:20

Iran and the world are being liberated from Deep State, satanic rule. This is the Great Awakening, the Golden Age of Gesara-Nesara. We are not going to “fix” the old parasitic, satanic, maritime system. We are not simply going to have fair elections and new senators, or simply switch to asset backed currency. We are shifting timelines completely. Money will no longer be an issue. We are being freed from the endless. Endless wars, endless insolvable conflict, endless poverty and sickness. We are moving into a new system, known as Gesara-Nesara. Free energy will be made available to the good people of the earth. Transportation and material possessions will be available to all. Prosperity and peace will rule. We are returning to Divine Rule. To the Constitutional Republic. Our responsibility is to change ourselves. To accept the bounty that is our birthright without fear. To Love, To Create, To Live with joy and freedom. We are ISBEs. Immortal Spiritual Biological Entities. Our children will never be stolen by the hybrids again. Welcome Home ISBEs.

Eli Weber

109,308 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.
3:02

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

Svetlana Lokhova

254,325 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

AOC: Mr. Bezos’s newspaper was not happy that I discussed abuses of market power and scale. And I think there are quite a lot of billionaires—I mean, there aren’t a lot of billionaires in an absolute sense, but the proportion of billionaires upset with my comments is quite high. And I think that, to a working person and to working people, “earn” means something: the calluses on your hands, the aches in your joints, the way that we earn our way through school, through our first job. And I think that we are in an emperor-with-no-clothes moment when it comes to the American economy and our democracy. The Virginia redistricting maps were just overturned this morning by judges that are largely financed by a movement of billionaires. And American inequality is at an absolute peak. We have to ask ourselves if this is how we want to live as a society—if we want 3,400 people to be prioritized over well more than 300 million. And when we question the legitimacy of that power structure, the people at the top are going to be very mad. And the little hobby newspapers that they’ve bought—which they love to say are making the quality of everything better. Jeff Bezos purchased the The Washington Post. He laid off some of the highly qualified journalists that made it an American institution so that he could turn it into a mouthpiece that launders his personal agenda and opinions. And he is using it because, for a lot of folks, it’s not enough to be powerful—they have to be loved. And he then uses this mouthpiece to take aim at politicians who want to question the deeply unequal and unjust distribution of power in America. They want to continue to undercut, threaten, and punish those who say: democracy belongs at the ballot box—economic power, political power—and that power should belong to the people of this country, not the very few.
3:29

AOC: Mr. Bezos’s newspaper was not happy that I discussed abuses of market power and scale. And I think there are quite a lot of billionaires—I mean, there aren’t a lot of billionaires in an absolute sense, but the proportion of billionaires upset with my comments is quite high. And I think that, to a working person and to working people, “earn” means something: the calluses on your hands, the aches in your joints, the way that we earn our way through school, through our first job. And I think that we are in an emperor-with-no-clothes moment when it comes to the American economy and our democracy. The Virginia redistricting maps were just overturned this morning by judges that are largely financed by a movement of billionaires. And American inequality is at an absolute peak. We have to ask ourselves if this is how we want to live as a society—if we want 3,400 people to be prioritized over well more than 300 million. And when we question the legitimacy of that power structure, the people at the top are going to be very mad. And the little hobby newspapers that they’ve bought—which they love to say are making the quality of everything better. Jeff Bezos purchased the The Washington Post. He laid off some of the highly qualified journalists that made it an American institution so that he could turn it into a mouthpiece that launders his personal agenda and opinions. And he is using it because, for a lot of folks, it’s not enough to be powerful—they have to be loved. And he then uses this mouthpiece to take aim at politicians who want to question the deeply unequal and unjust distribution of power in America. They want to continue to undercut, threaten, and punish those who say: democracy belongs at the ballot box—economic power, political power—and that power should belong to the people of this country, not the very few.

Acyn

25,639 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

CLARITY 1. EO 13772 - The First Signal (Day 14 of Term #1) On Feb 3, 2017, just 14 days into office, President Trump signed Executive Order 13772, directing the U.S. Treasury to: • restructure the financial system, • evaluate systemic risk, • reduce regulatory capture, • and modernize outdated banking frameworks. In plain English: He declared the beginning of a controlled demolition of the legacy system. This was not random. It was lightning-fast. No President in history had ever opened their term by attacking the structure of the monetary system itself. 2. “Stable Genius” - A Strange Phrase That Ages Like Prophecy When Trump repeatedly called himself a “stable genius,” most people assumed he was trolling his critics. But with hindsight and pattern recognition (your specialty), the phrase becomes… something else. “Stable” “Genius” Then years later we find… 3. The First Digital Asset Legislation in U.S. History Becomes… the “GENIUS Act” The first serious U.S. digital asset legislation focused on digital “STABLE” instruments? The GENIUS Act. You now have: • EO 13772 → reform the system • “Stable Genius” → odd but now oddly exact • GENIUS Act → first U.S. digital Stable-coin framework This pairing isn’t coincidence. It’s sequencing. Intentional sequencing. And it maps perfectly onto the mission he declared in his FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS… 4. The Promise: “We Are Transferring Power Back to You, The People.” Trump’s most important sentence, spoken at the Capitol on Jan 20, 2017: “We are transferring power from Washington, D.C., and giving it back to you, the American people.” Everyone clapped. But almost no one understood how such a transfer could occur. Because the real power is not political. It’s monetary. The one lever capable of redistributing real power back to the people is: Decentralized, cryptographically-verified, publicly auditable money rails. i.e., DLT & DeFi. Which brings us to the next domino… 5. DLT = The End of Fiat, Usury, and Central Banking Secrecy Distributed Ledger Technology (especially neutral, Layer-1 institutional DLT like the XRPL) does the following: • Eliminates opaque balance sheets • Kills unaudited money creation • Destroys the fractional reserve model • Ends back-room repo leverage games • Blocks globalist NGOs from siphoning trillions through monetary opacity • Returns monetary sovereignty to local actors - individuals, businesses, municipalities In other words: DLT achieves exactly what EO13772 directed Treasury to evaluate. And it is the only known technology capable of “returning power to the people.” 6. Why This Is Existential for the Federal Reserve System DLT-enabled DeFi replaces: • the need for a central lender of last resort • the cartel’s privilege of issuing currency without collateral • the private banking network’s monopoly on settlement • the hidden pipelines feeding wealth from producers → rent-seekers DLT: • decentralizes • democratizes • disintermediates This is not a policy tweak. This is a new operating system for the world. And it directly fulfills the core promise of Jan 20, 2017. 7. The Trump Pattern: “Stable → Genius → DeFi → Power Back to the People.” Put the steps together: 1. EO 13772 (Day 14) - 2017 Signals a full audit and restructuring of the U.S. financial system. 2. “Stable Genius”self-reference A peculiar phrase that later matches legislative outcomes too cleanly to ignore. 3. GENIUS Act - 2025 The first U.S. digital asset / stable instrument act. • Name aligned. • Timing aligned. • Intent aligned. 4. DeFi & DLT rise globally The very technology necessary to transfer monetary power back to individual producers. 5. Fed system destabilized by transparency Opaque fiat, derivative leverage, and fractional reserve games cannot survive public DLT audit rails. 6. Trump’s core promise fulfilled “Return power to you, the people.” Not symbolically. Mechanically. Monetarily. 🧵Part 2/2, below
10:36

CLARITY 1. EO 13772 - The First Signal (Day 14 of Term #1) On Feb 3, 2017, just 14 days into office, President Trump signed Executive Order 13772, directing the U.S. Treasury to: • restructure the financial system, • evaluate systemic risk, • reduce regulatory capture, • and modernize outdated banking frameworks. In plain English: He declared the beginning of a controlled demolition of the legacy system. This was not random. It was lightning-fast. No President in history had ever opened their term by attacking the structure of the monetary system itself. 2. “Stable Genius” - A Strange Phrase That Ages Like Prophecy When Trump repeatedly called himself a “stable genius,” most people assumed he was trolling his critics. But with hindsight and pattern recognition (your specialty), the phrase becomes… something else. “Stable” “Genius” Then years later we find… 3. The First Digital Asset Legislation in U.S. History Becomes… the “GENIUS Act” The first serious U.S. digital asset legislation focused on digital “STABLE” instruments? The GENIUS Act. You now have: • EO 13772 → reform the system • “Stable Genius” → odd but now oddly exact • GENIUS Act → first U.S. digital Stable-coin framework This pairing isn’t coincidence. It’s sequencing. Intentional sequencing. And it maps perfectly onto the mission he declared in his FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS… 4. The Promise: “We Are Transferring Power Back to You, The People.” Trump’s most important sentence, spoken at the Capitol on Jan 20, 2017: “We are transferring power from Washington, D.C., and giving it back to you, the American people.” Everyone clapped. But almost no one understood how such a transfer could occur. Because the real power is not political. It’s monetary. The one lever capable of redistributing real power back to the people is: Decentralized, cryptographically-verified, publicly auditable money rails. i.e., DLT & DeFi. Which brings us to the next domino… 5. DLT = The End of Fiat, Usury, and Central Banking Secrecy Distributed Ledger Technology (especially neutral, Layer-1 institutional DLT like the XRPL) does the following: • Eliminates opaque balance sheets • Kills unaudited money creation • Destroys the fractional reserve model • Ends back-room repo leverage games • Blocks globalist NGOs from siphoning trillions through monetary opacity • Returns monetary sovereignty to local actors - individuals, businesses, municipalities In other words: DLT achieves exactly what EO13772 directed Treasury to evaluate. And it is the only known technology capable of “returning power to the people.” 6. Why This Is Existential for the Federal Reserve System DLT-enabled DeFi replaces: • the need for a central lender of last resort • the cartel’s privilege of issuing currency without collateral • the private banking network’s monopoly on settlement • the hidden pipelines feeding wealth from producers → rent-seekers DLT: • decentralizes • democratizes • disintermediates This is not a policy tweak. This is a new operating system for the world. And it directly fulfills the core promise of Jan 20, 2017. 7. The Trump Pattern: “Stable → Genius → DeFi → Power Back to the People.” Put the steps together: 1. EO 13772 (Day 14) - 2017 Signals a full audit and restructuring of the U.S. financial system. 2. “Stable Genius”self-reference A peculiar phrase that later matches legislative outcomes too cleanly to ignore. 3. GENIUS Act - 2025 The first U.S. digital asset / stable instrument act. • Name aligned. • Timing aligned. • Intent aligned. 4. DeFi & DLT rise globally The very technology necessary to transfer monetary power back to individual producers. 5. Fed system destabilized by transparency Opaque fiat, derivative leverage, and fractional reserve games cannot survive public DLT audit rails. 6. Trump’s core promise fulfilled “Return power to you, the people.” Not symbolically. Mechanically. Monetarily. 🧵Part 2/2, below

Rob Cunningham

151,215 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large." "Scotland is annexed, a dominion under the English crown. And it is the English crown, not the fictional UK crown, that we're all told about. "Not a partner, not of any kind. In fact, the whole partnership story is a concoction fashioned to convince the world that Scots are part of a joint state and to disguise the fact that Scotland is, in reality, nothing other than a colony. "It's not a partner in a marriage, but a kidnap victim. And you do not escape from a kidnapper by filing for divorce from a fictional marriage. "Second, even if it were possible to break free through a referendum or an election, or to propose any other route that would be approved as lawful by the kidnapping state, the political system in Scotland would not guarantee any of the things that sing in our bones as Scots. We dream of justice, compassion, equality, prosperity and care for all without preference or privilege. "But what we have is an english system of concentrated power and privilege, which those Scots who enjoy it will not give up easily. Where the government sits in authority over the people, and the people surrender their hopes, their ambitions and their human and civil rights to the whims of their elected representatives. Where all that we hold dear, all that we depend on for decency, fairness and security, depends on the honor, honesty and good faith of those elected. "Because once it is elected, we have no means of curbing, challenging or preventing anything a government may choose to do, whether or not that's lawful, just, rational or humane. "Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large. Our helplessness in the face of the state marching side by side with destitution and despair. "This is why liberation was born. Because the route to the Scotland we dream of neither can nor will come through the present political system, but through the restoration of the political, territorial and judicial rights, the constitutional provisions that belong to the people of this nation, in law and in justice, even under the terms of this fraudulent union, and certainly under international law. "They mean that we, the people, are sovereign, in fact, not in sound bite, the ultimate authority of this nation of Scotland. "They mean that the interests of the people, collectively known as the common good, are not only the primary purpose of government, but the only condition on which it's permitted to exist. "They mean that we are entitled to overrule, remove or replace a government that violates that condition of its existence, that fails to honour its promises, to consult the people or to act according to their wishes and welfare. "And in the modern world, that means the right to all the mechanisms that we see in a nation like Switzerland, which will make that sovereign power a reality. "All this is part of what we call decolonization, true Scottish self determination. And it is the soul and purpose of liberation Scotland. "Impossible? Other nations have trodden the path to decolonisation. Not one has bowed to the kidnapper and asked for permission. "We know now that we can gain our independence as a state by first gaining independence from a colonizing power. So that instead of waiting to reclaim real sovereignty of the people after independence, we gain our independence by first reclaiming our sovereign Scottish rights. "The next step on this road is establishing the committee of the Scottish Liberation Movement. This committee will be elected from the membership of Liberation and will operate under a ratified constitution. "And it will register Scotland's Liberation Movement with the United Nations." Sara Salyers @TheScotCongress Iain.lawson27 Salvo.Scot Colette Walker
4:19

"Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large." "Scotland is annexed, a dominion under the English crown. And it is the English crown, not the fictional UK crown, that we're all told about. "Not a partner, not of any kind. In fact, the whole partnership story is a concoction fashioned to convince the world that Scots are part of a joint state and to disguise the fact that Scotland is, in reality, nothing other than a colony. "It's not a partner in a marriage, but a kidnap victim. And you do not escape from a kidnapper by filing for divorce from a fictional marriage. "Second, even if it were possible to break free through a referendum or an election, or to propose any other route that would be approved as lawful by the kidnapping state, the political system in Scotland would not guarantee any of the things that sing in our bones as Scots. We dream of justice, compassion, equality, prosperity and care for all without preference or privilege. "But what we have is an english system of concentrated power and privilege, which those Scots who enjoy it will not give up easily. Where the government sits in authority over the people, and the people surrender their hopes, their ambitions and their human and civil rights to the whims of their elected representatives. Where all that we hold dear, all that we depend on for decency, fairness and security, depends on the honor, honesty and good faith of those elected. "Because once it is elected, we have no means of curbing, challenging or preventing anything a government may choose to do, whether or not that's lawful, just, rational or humane. "Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large. Our helplessness in the face of the state marching side by side with destitution and despair. "This is why liberation was born. Because the route to the Scotland we dream of neither can nor will come through the present political system, but through the restoration of the political, territorial and judicial rights, the constitutional provisions that belong to the people of this nation, in law and in justice, even under the terms of this fraudulent union, and certainly under international law. "They mean that we, the people, are sovereign, in fact, not in sound bite, the ultimate authority of this nation of Scotland. "They mean that the interests of the people, collectively known as the common good, are not only the primary purpose of government, but the only condition on which it's permitted to exist. "They mean that we are entitled to overrule, remove or replace a government that violates that condition of its existence, that fails to honour its promises, to consult the people or to act according to their wishes and welfare. "And in the modern world, that means the right to all the mechanisms that we see in a nation like Switzerland, which will make that sovereign power a reality. "All this is part of what we call decolonization, true Scottish self determination. And it is the soul and purpose of liberation Scotland. "Impossible? Other nations have trodden the path to decolonisation. Not one has bowed to the kidnapper and asked for permission. "We know now that we can gain our independence as a state by first gaining independence from a colonizing power. So that instead of waiting to reclaim real sovereignty of the people after independence, we gain our independence by first reclaiming our sovereign Scottish rights. "The next step on this road is establishing the committee of the Scottish Liberation Movement. This committee will be elected from the membership of Liberation and will operate under a ratified constitution. "And it will register Scotland's Liberation Movement with the United Nations." Sara Salyers @TheScotCongress Iain.lawson27 Salvo.Scot Colette Walker

ScotNews

20,333 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025
0:58

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,738,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The U.S. dollar used to be backed by gold — and it’s not farfetched to think we may be headed there again in the future. History shows us that the same cycles repeat time and time again. One such cycle is related to currency devaluation. Once people start to lose trust in the fiat system, we see a specific cause and effect reaction occur. 1) Governments print a lot of money 2) They pay off the debt with the cheap money 3) Nobody wants to hold the devalued currency 4) Governments go back and link money to gold Will this same pattern happen again? It’s hard to say, and it wouldn’t happen anytime soon. But it is conceivable.
0:47

The U.S. dollar used to be backed by gold — and it’s not farfetched to think we may be headed there again in the future. History shows us that the same cycles repeat time and time again. One such cycle is related to currency devaluation. Once people start to lose trust in the fiat system, we see a specific cause and effect reaction occur. 1) Governments print a lot of money 2) They pay off the debt with the cheap money 3) Nobody wants to hold the devalued currency 4) Governments go back and link money to gold Will this same pattern happen again? It’s hard to say, and it wouldn’t happen anytime soon. But it is conceivable.

Ray Dalio

273,523 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The media and every tariff doomsayer on cable news is not going to like this announcement one bit. From inside the Cabinet Room, President Trump revealed that American farmers will be receiving $12 billion in relief…and the money is not coming from taxpayers. It’s all funded directly from tariff revenue. TRUMP: “I am delighted to announce this afternoon the United States will take a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs…so what we’re doing is we’re taking a relatively small portion of that and going to be giving and providing to farmers in economic assistance.” “We love our farmers. As you know, farmers like me, based on voting trends, voting trends or anything else, they are great people, they are the backbone of our country.” “We’re going to use that money to provide $12 billion in economic assistance to American farmers.” “$12 billion is a lot of money, what do you think?”
1:19

The media and every tariff doomsayer on cable news is not going to like this announcement one bit. From inside the Cabinet Room, President Trump revealed that American farmers will be receiving $12 billion in relief…and the money is not coming from taxpayers. It’s all funded directly from tariff revenue. TRUMP: “I am delighted to announce this afternoon the United States will take a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs…so what we’re doing is we’re taking a relatively small portion of that and going to be giving and providing to farmers in economic assistance.” “We love our farmers. As you know, farmers like me, based on voting trends, voting trends or anything else, they are great people, they are the backbone of our country.” “We’re going to use that money to provide $12 billion in economic assistance to American farmers.” “$12 billion is a lot of money, what do you think?”

Overton

79,939 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NO INCOME TAXES: President Trump states that INCOME TAX will most likely be abolished for a great number of people due to the massive amount of money being brought in from TARIFFS. This is how the U.S. used to operate and why TARIFFS are a massive success to the country. Only a very small fraction of people used to pay income taxes. Specifically, around the years 1894 and the early 1900s to 1917, the federal income tax applied to less than 1% of the population. "I believe in the not-too-distant future you won't even have income tax to pay. Because the money [from tariffs] is so enormous." "Whether you get rid of it, or keep it around for fun, or have it really low, much lower than it is now. But you won't be paying income tax." – President Donald J. Trump
0:28

NO INCOME TAXES: President Trump states that INCOME TAX will most likely be abolished for a great number of people due to the massive amount of money being brought in from TARIFFS. This is how the U.S. used to operate and why TARIFFS are a massive success to the country. Only a very small fraction of people used to pay income taxes. Specifically, around the years 1894 and the early 1900s to 1917, the federal income tax applied to less than 1% of the population. "I believe in the not-too-distant future you won't even have income tax to pay. Because the money [from tariffs] is so enormous." "Whether you get rid of it, or keep it around for fun, or have it really low, much lower than it is now. But you won't be paying income tax." – President Donald J. Trump

The SCIF

27,822 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Holder: You know, they have elections in Russia, and Putin gets 95, 93% of the vote. We’ll continue to have elections here in the US. The question is whether or not the elections that we have here will be meaningful ones—whether the people will actually get the opportunity to express their views on the policy direction of the nation. And so again, it’s all about power—whether it’s gerrymandering, weakening the Voting Rights Act to take power away from people who the people in power now think are not supportive of them. It’s all about the acquisition and the use of power. And that’s one thing that we on the progressive side, on the Democratic side, have got to get used to. It’s not a bad thing for us to say that we want to acquire and use power. Doesn’t mean we’re going to use it in the same way that Republicans and conservatives have—in the negative way that they have done it. But Roosevelt wasn’t afraid of acquiring and using power. Johnson wasn’t afraid of acquiring and using power. That’s what we have to be about. And so, fighting back the way in which Governor Newsom has, and folks in California, by putting together Prop 50, is exactly what we have to do. We’ve got to fight for this.
1:50

Holder: You know, they have elections in Russia, and Putin gets 95, 93% of the vote. We’ll continue to have elections here in the US. The question is whether or not the elections that we have here will be meaningful ones—whether the people will actually get the opportunity to express their views on the policy direction of the nation. And so again, it’s all about power—whether it’s gerrymandering, weakening the Voting Rights Act to take power away from people who the people in power now think are not supportive of them. It’s all about the acquisition and the use of power. And that’s one thing that we on the progressive side, on the Democratic side, have got to get used to. It’s not a bad thing for us to say that we want to acquire and use power. Doesn’t mean we’re going to use it in the same way that Republicans and conservatives have—in the negative way that they have done it. But Roosevelt wasn’t afraid of acquiring and using power. Johnson wasn’t afraid of acquiring and using power. That’s what we have to be about. And so, fighting back the way in which Governor Newsom has, and folks in California, by putting together Prop 50, is exactly what we have to do. We’ve got to fight for this.

Acyn

73,227 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Elon Musk: We must end the tyranny of the bureaucracy. “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people, you do not have democracy, you have rule of the bureau, bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to follow to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 3, 2025
0:58

Elon Musk: We must end the tyranny of the bureaucracy. “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people, you do not have democracy, you have rule of the bureau, bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to follow to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 3, 2025

ELON CLIPS

14,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Secretary Scott Turner FIRES BACK at left-wing media pundits trying to paint the crackdown on Somali fraud in Minnesota as “racist.” Turner said this isn’t about ethnicity...it’s about enforcing the law, and some people do not want the law enforced. TURNER: “Well, Julie, it has nothing to do with it. It’s smoke and mirrors. This is all a distraction from what the real problem is here.” “This has nothing to do with race, nothing to do with ethnicity. Under President Trump’s leadership, American people...American people are first. Our country is first.” “It has nothing to do with the Somalis but it has everything to do with criminal activity.” “Our job, when we get appointed or elected, is to uphold the law, and that’s what you see going on right now.” “And there’s a lot of people in our country, some of the far-left media, far-left activists, who do not want the laws of America to be upheld.” “But this is a day, with President Trump and other leaders in our administration, where we are going to uphold the law, enforce the law, and prioritize the American people and the American people ONLY.”
0:49

Secretary Scott Turner FIRES BACK at left-wing media pundits trying to paint the crackdown on Somali fraud in Minnesota as “racist.” Turner said this isn’t about ethnicity...it’s about enforcing the law, and some people do not want the law enforced. TURNER: “Well, Julie, it has nothing to do with it. It’s smoke and mirrors. This is all a distraction from what the real problem is here.” “This has nothing to do with race, nothing to do with ethnicity. Under President Trump’s leadership, American people...American people are first. Our country is first.” “It has nothing to do with the Somalis but it has everything to do with criminal activity.” “Our job, when we get appointed or elected, is to uphold the law, and that’s what you see going on right now.” “And there’s a lot of people in our country, some of the far-left media, far-left activists, who do not want the laws of America to be upheld.” “But this is a day, with President Trump and other leaders in our administration, where we are going to uphold the law, enforce the law, and prioritize the American people and the American people ONLY.”

Overton

55,306 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

At the SBC in 2016, Russell Moore answers the question about building mosques. The question: “I would like to know how in the world someone in the Southern Baptist Convention can support the defending of rights for Muslims to construct mosques in the united states when these people threaten our very way of existence as Christians and Americans. They are murdering Christians, beheading Christians, imprisoning Christians all over the world. Do you actually believe that if Jesus Christ were here today, He would actually support this and that He would stand up and say, well, let us support the rights of those Baal worshippers to erect temples to Baal? Do you believe that Dr. Moore?” He says he believes in “soul freedom.” Wait for him to say “that a government that has the power to outlaw people from assembling….” Russell Moore: “You know sometimes we have to deal with questions that are really complicated and we have to spend a lot of time thinking them through and not sure what the final result was going to be. Sometimes we have really hard decisions to make. This isn’t one of those things.” “And brothers and sisters, when you have a government that says we can decide whether or not a house of worship can be constructed upon the theological beliefs of that house of worship, then there are going to be Southern Baptist churches in San Francisco and in New York and throughout the country who are not going to be able to build. And the bigger issue, though, is not one of self-interest.” “What it means to be a Baptist is to support soul freedom for everybody.” “The bigger issue is that we have been called to the gospel of Jesus Christ. A government that has the power to outlaw people from assembling together and saying what they believe – that does not turn people into Christians, that turns people into pretend Christians and it sends them straight to hell. The answer to Islam is not government power. The answer is the gospel of Jesus Christ and the new birth that comes from that.”
2:09

At the SBC in 2016, Russell Moore answers the question about building mosques. The question: “I would like to know how in the world someone in the Southern Baptist Convention can support the defending of rights for Muslims to construct mosques in the united states when these people threaten our very way of existence as Christians and Americans. They are murdering Christians, beheading Christians, imprisoning Christians all over the world. Do you actually believe that if Jesus Christ were here today, He would actually support this and that He would stand up and say, well, let us support the rights of those Baal worshippers to erect temples to Baal? Do you believe that Dr. Moore?” He says he believes in “soul freedom.” Wait for him to say “that a government that has the power to outlaw people from assembling….” Russell Moore: “You know sometimes we have to deal with questions that are really complicated and we have to spend a lot of time thinking them through and not sure what the final result was going to be. Sometimes we have really hard decisions to make. This isn’t one of those things.” “And brothers and sisters, when you have a government that says we can decide whether or not a house of worship can be constructed upon the theological beliefs of that house of worship, then there are going to be Southern Baptist churches in San Francisco and in New York and throughout the country who are not going to be able to build. And the bigger issue, though, is not one of self-interest.” “What it means to be a Baptist is to support soul freedom for everybody.” “The bigger issue is that we have been called to the gospel of Jesus Christ. A government that has the power to outlaw people from assembling together and saying what they believe – that does not turn people into Christians, that turns people into pretend Christians and it sends them straight to hell. The answer to Islam is not government power. The answer is the gospel of Jesus Christ and the new birth that comes from that.”

Terri Green

15,417 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten