Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Let’s get this straight on Lindsay Clancy. We do NOT know the jury split for certain. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington is the one floating 11–1 his way, and he’s apparently reading that into a jury note he saw or heard. That doesn’t make it gospel. It makes it his...

GuntherEagleman's profile picture

Gunther Eagleman™

1,766,810 subscribers

100,831 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING: The foreperson in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial just delivered a note asking for one juror to be removed for not following the rules regarding the law's definition of reasonable doubt. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington then asked for that juror to be removed. The prosecution, however, stated that it felt the judge's instructions to the jury were sufficient, and the existing jury is now continuing to deliberate, as instructed by the judge.
2:51

BREAKING: The foreperson in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial just delivered a note asking for one juror to be removed for not following the rules regarding the law's definition of reasonable doubt. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington then asked for that juror to be removed. The prosecution, however, stated that it felt the judge's instructions to the jury were sufficient, and the existing jury is now continuing to deliberate, as instructed by the judge.

CBS News

293,207 просмотров • 7 дней назад

BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy trial is hanging by ONE juror. Reports say the jury is 11–1. Eleven jurors apparently ready to let her walk. One person still saying she should be held responsible for strangling her own three kids. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington lost it when the judge wouldn’t kick that holdout off the jury. Threw papers, was huffing and puffing at the table. The Judge actually had to tell him his behavior was inappropriate. Then the judge asked the question nobody on that defense table wanted: How do you know removing that juror wouldn’t lead to a conviction? If they come back still deadlocked, it’s a mistrial. After everything those children went through, that’s where we are. How does a man sleep at night fighting this hard to get her off?
2:39

BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy trial is hanging by ONE juror. Reports say the jury is 11–1. Eleven jurors apparently ready to let her walk. One person still saying she should be held responsible for strangling her own three kids. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington lost it when the judge wouldn’t kick that holdout off the jury. Threw papers, was huffing and puffing at the table. The Judge actually had to tell him his behavior was inappropriate. Then the judge asked the question nobody on that defense table wanted: How do you know removing that juror wouldn’t lead to a conviction? If they come back still deadlocked, it’s a mistrial. After everything those children went through, that’s where we are. How does a man sleep at night fighting this hard to get her off?

Clerpatriot

67,027 просмотров • 7 дней назад

🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions HOLD THE LINE!! The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her "There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"
1:05

🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions HOLD THE LINE!! The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her "There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"

Eric Daugherty

4,180,813 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Lindsay Clancy’s jury just got sent home AGAIN. Still no verdict. Still no mistrial. Still deadlocked. Reading the tea leaves from the courthouse: it’s 11–1. Eleven jurors look ready to buy not guilty by reason of insanity. One juror won’t. They asked the judge to re-read reasonable doubt. Defense is cheering like that note is theirs. And here’s the Massachusetts twist almost nobody outside the courtroom gets — in most states, insanity is an affirmative defense the defendant has to prove. In Massachusetts, the prosecution has to prove she WASN’T insane. Three dead kids. Days of deliberation. And the fight in that room may be whether one holdout refuses to rubber-stamp an insanity walk under a burden stacked against the state. Back tomorrow at 9am. She should already be convicted.
6:07

Lindsay Clancy’s jury just got sent home AGAIN. Still no verdict. Still no mistrial. Still deadlocked. Reading the tea leaves from the courthouse: it’s 11–1. Eleven jurors look ready to buy not guilty by reason of insanity. One juror won’t. They asked the judge to re-read reasonable doubt. Defense is cheering like that note is theirs. And here’s the Massachusetts twist almost nobody outside the courtroom gets — in most states, insanity is an affirmative defense the defendant has to prove. In Massachusetts, the prosecution has to prove she WASN’T insane. Three dead kids. Days of deliberation. And the fight in that room may be whether one holdout refuses to rubber-stamp an insanity walk under a burden stacked against the state. Back tomorrow at 9am. She should already be convicted.

Gunther Eagleman™

44,120 просмотров • 7 дней назад

LINDSAY CLANCY DEFENSE ACCUSES JUROR OF LYING UNDER OATH A dramatic exchange erupts in the Lindsay Clancy trial as defense attorney Kevin Reddington accuses a juror of lying under oath and refusing to apply the court’s reasonable doubt instructions. The defense claims the jury is essentially “11 to 1” and argues that one juror has acknowledged doubt but is refusing to apply it when considering a not guilty verdict. Reddington tells the judge the alleged conduct goes beyond a disagreement during deliberations, accusing the juror of making a false statement under oath The judge is asked to intervene as the jury remains deadlocked. For more updates, watch OAN on OAN Live.
1:45

LINDSAY CLANCY DEFENSE ACCUSES JUROR OF LYING UNDER OATH A dramatic exchange erupts in the Lindsay Clancy trial as defense attorney Kevin Reddington accuses a juror of lying under oath and refusing to apply the court’s reasonable doubt instructions. The defense claims the jury is essentially “11 to 1” and argues that one juror has acknowledged doubt but is refusing to apply it when considering a not guilty verdict. Reddington tells the judge the alleged conduct goes beyond a disagreement during deliberations, accusing the juror of making a false statement under oath The judge is asked to intervene as the jury remains deadlocked. For more updates, watch OAN on OAN Live.

One America News

34,826 просмотров • 6 дней назад

This is wild NBC reporter Laura Jarrett seems to agree that the one juror who’s holding up the verdict and will likely be the only one to find Lindsay Clancy guilty should be removed “Why wouldn't the judge just remove that one juror — if there is any suggestion at all that that juror is not able to follow the law, why wouldn't the judge just entertain the defense motion to remove that jury — I mean, these jurors have been at this for days now, right? Don't the rest of the jurors, sort of get some benefit of the doubt for trying to follow the law, but they're being held up by one person who refuses to?” The one juror isn’t refusing to follow the law, the juror likely is the only one who doesn’t see reasonable doubt and knows she’s guilty This woman murdered her 3 children To be crystal clear, Lindsay Clancy admitted that she killed her three children by strangling them with exercise bands in the basement of their Duxbury, Massachusetts home Her attorneys have repeatedly stated she does not dispute killing the children
3:13

This is wild NBC reporter Laura Jarrett seems to agree that the one juror who’s holding up the verdict and will likely be the only one to find Lindsay Clancy guilty should be removed “Why wouldn't the judge just remove that one juror — if there is any suggestion at all that that juror is not able to follow the law, why wouldn't the judge just entertain the defense motion to remove that jury — I mean, these jurors have been at this for days now, right? Don't the rest of the jurors, sort of get some benefit of the doubt for trying to follow the law, but they're being held up by one person who refuses to?” The one juror isn’t refusing to follow the law, the juror likely is the only one who doesn’t see reasonable doubt and knows she’s guilty This woman murdered her 3 children To be crystal clear, Lindsay Clancy admitted that she killed her three children by strangling them with exercise bands in the basement of their Duxbury, Massachusetts home Her attorneys have repeatedly stated she does not dispute killing the children

Wall Street Apes

435,870 просмотров • 6 дней назад

"They know that they were robbed by one man": Defense attorney Kevin Reddington says his client Lindsay Clancy and her family are "not good" after a judge declared a mistrial. He expresses criticism towards one male juror that is said to have been a holdout against an acquittal. More:
0:50

"They know that they were robbed by one man": Defense attorney Kevin Reddington says his client Lindsay Clancy and her family are "not good" after a judge declared a mistrial. He expresses criticism towards one male juror that is said to have been a holdout against an acquittal. More:

NewsNation

11,215 просмотров • 6 дней назад

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley says that multiple jurors might've SWITCHED toward reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy, but ONE DID NOT "If THIS juror remains unchanged...we WILL HAVE A MISTRIAL." The defense is currently furious. One juror could let the case go all over again with a NEW JURY "There was tension...it's possible some jurors switched, but that one holdout remains."
1:00

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley says that multiple jurors might've SWITCHED toward reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy, but ONE DID NOT "If THIS juror remains unchanged...we WILL HAVE A MISTRIAL." The defense is currently furious. One juror could let the case go all over again with a NEW JURY "There was tension...it's possible some jurors switched, but that one holdout remains."

Eric Daugherty

917,410 просмотров • 7 дней назад

🚨 JUST NOW: It's being predicted that some jurors are NOT sure that Lindsay Clancy is guilty beyond "reasonable doubt," after the judge just instructed them on what that precisely means "The jury seems to agree on the facts but not whether it rises to beyond reasonable doubt." Which juror GENUINELY thinks killing her 3 kids and admitting it with ample evidence isn't enough?! This is utter insanity, she ADMITTED TO THE CRIME!!
1:16

🚨 JUST NOW: It's being predicted that some jurors are NOT sure that Lindsay Clancy is guilty beyond "reasonable doubt," after the judge just instructed them on what that precisely means "The jury seems to agree on the facts but not whether it rises to beyond reasonable doubt." Which juror GENUINELY thinks killing her 3 kids and admitting it with ample evidence isn't enough?! This is utter insanity, she ADMITTED TO THE CRIME!!

Eric Daugherty

66,861 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Will Cain asked the right question about Lindsay Clancy’s holdout juror. What kind of person sits alone against eleven? Dr. Joseph Whitt called it: a man of conviction. Reddington’s own comments paint it as 11 for acquittal and one who wouldn’t go along. Unanimous exists for exactly that reason… so majority pressure doesn’t become a verdict. He didn’t cave. He held the line. That’s why we still have a mistrial instead of a free pass.
1:24

Will Cain asked the right question about Lindsay Clancy’s holdout juror. What kind of person sits alone against eleven? Dr. Joseph Whitt called it: a man of conviction. Reddington’s own comments paint it as 11 for acquittal and one who wouldn’t go along. Unanimous exists for exactly that reason… so majority pressure doesn’t become a verdict. He didn’t cave. He held the line. That’s why we still have a mistrial instead of a free pass.

Gunther Eagleman™

56,490 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Jonathan Turley just called Kevin Reddington’s appeal what it is: unbelievable… and barely intelligible. The defense filed a seven-page petition to Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court claiming one juror “acknowledged doubt” but is “refusing to apply it as the law states,” so kick him or grill him harder. Turley’s read: disagreeing with the other eleven is NOT grounds to swap in an alternate. The judge already asked if they could follow the law. The only “evidence” is that this juror won’t cave. And the court already decided there’s a mistrial. Reddington’s trying to fire the one man who wouldn’t let Lindsay Clancy walk… after the mistrial bell already rang. That’s not following the law. That’s hunting the holdout.
1:47

Jonathan Turley just called Kevin Reddington’s appeal what it is: unbelievable… and barely intelligible. The defense filed a seven-page petition to Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court claiming one juror “acknowledged doubt” but is “refusing to apply it as the law states,” so kick him or grill him harder. Turley’s read: disagreeing with the other eleven is NOT grounds to swap in an alternate. The judge already asked if they could follow the law. The only “evidence” is that this juror won’t cave. And the court already decided there’s a mistrial. Reddington’s trying to fire the one man who wouldn’t let Lindsay Clancy walk… after the mistrial bell already rang. That’s not following the law. That’s hunting the holdout.

Gunther Eagleman™

70,408 просмотров • 6 дней назад

🚨BREAKING: Three jurors have now come forward in the Lindsay Clancy case.🚨 One juror described what happened during deliberations with the lone holdout: “He admitted he had reasonable doubt…. I started filling out the forms. I was so excited…. And then he said, ‘But I’m still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.’” I would also love to interview the holdout juror and hear his side of what happened inside that jury room. If you are that juror and are willing to speak with me, please reach out.
0:28

🚨BREAKING: Three jurors have now come forward in the Lindsay Clancy case.🚨 One juror described what happened during deliberations with the lone holdout: “He admitted he had reasonable doubt…. I started filling out the forms. I was so excited…. And then he said, ‘But I’m still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.’” I would also love to interview the holdout juror and hear his side of what happened inside that jury room. If you are that juror and are willing to speak with me, please reach out.

Sarah Fields

3,283,712 просмотров • 2 дней назад

The judge just instructed the jury “If there are any notes in the future… make sure we don’t put down where everyone is numerically”. Well, the damage is done. And if it is wrong, going forward, it was wrong to have done in the first place. Not only did the note indicate specifically ONE lone holdout and put a target on that juror’s back, Reddington amplified it and said “the juror has been identified”. If that is not juror intimidation, I don’t know what is.
1:33

The judge just instructed the jury “If there are any notes in the future… make sure we don’t put down where everyone is numerically”. Well, the damage is done. And if it is wrong, going forward, it was wrong to have done in the first place. Not only did the note indicate specifically ONE lone holdout and put a target on that juror’s back, Reddington amplified it and said “the juror has been identified”. If that is not juror intimidation, I don’t know what is.

Viva Frei

802,943 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Mistrial. Heavy hearts. And Kevin Reddington came out swinging at the ONE man who wouldn’t let Lindsay Clancy walk. He called it a robbery. Said that juror stole seven weeks from the other eleven. Hoped the holdout “can sleep well at night.” Cora. Dawson. Callen. Those are the names that matter. DA Tim Cruz said it straight: the priority is the three children she strangled. Children were murdered. Seek justice. Not a mental-health seminar for the killer. Reddington wants you mad at the holdout. Be mad that three kids are dead… and she still isn’t convicted.
5:36

Mistrial. Heavy hearts. And Kevin Reddington came out swinging at the ONE man who wouldn’t let Lindsay Clancy walk. He called it a robbery. Said that juror stole seven weeks from the other eleven. Hoped the holdout “can sleep well at night.” Cora. Dawson. Callen. Those are the names that matter. DA Tim Cruz said it straight: the priority is the three children she strangled. Children were murdered. Seek justice. Not a mental-health seminar for the killer. Reddington wants you mad at the holdout. Be mad that three kids are dead… and she still isn’t convicted.

Gunther Eagleman™

76,157 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Reddington: “And based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to 1, and this person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence to return a NOT GUILTY verdict.” Okay. So, my prediction was accurate. This is crazy. (Lindsay Clancy Trial)
0:45

Reddington: “And based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to 1, and this person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence to return a NOT GUILTY verdict.” Okay. So, my prediction was accurate. This is crazy. (Lindsay Clancy Trial)

Lindsay 🇺🇸

25,441 просмотров • 6 дней назад

🚨#BREAKING: Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial just broke their silence... and revealed exactly how one man single-handedly caused the mistrial. Eleven jurors were ready to find her not guilty by reason of insanity. One man refused, even though admitted he had the doubt... and still wouldn't sign it. She says the lone holdout, a man, acknowledged he had reasonable doubt. Her words: "He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited." She thought it was over. She thought they finally had their verdict. And then, she says, he told the room: "But I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of insanity." Absolutely wild. GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!!
3:10

🚨#BREAKING: Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial just broke their silence... and revealed exactly how one man single-handedly caused the mistrial. Eleven jurors were ready to find her not guilty by reason of insanity. One man refused, even though admitted he had the doubt... and still wouldn't sign it. She says the lone holdout, a man, acknowledged he had reasonable doubt. Her words: "He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited." She thought it was over. She thought they finally had their verdict. And then, she says, he told the room: "But I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of insanity." Absolutely wild. GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!!

Matt Van Swol

2,367,322 просмотров • 2 дней назад

WAIT WAIT WAIT... So Lindsay Clancy's lawyer just stood up in open court and revealed that the jury is split 11 to 1 for NOT GUILTY and that the holdout is a MALE????? How is that information being aired publicly while deliberations are still happening?!!!! "We have a person who looked you in the eye and lied. That juror told you that he would be able to apply the law to the facts as you asked them!" "And based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to 1, and this person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence to return a not guilty verdict." "I would go so far as to reluctantly say that the individual has made a false statement under oath to this court."
2:23

WAIT WAIT WAIT... So Lindsay Clancy's lawyer just stood up in open court and revealed that the jury is split 11 to 1 for NOT GUILTY and that the holdout is a MALE????? How is that information being aired publicly while deliberations are still happening?!!!! "We have a person who looked you in the eye and lied. That juror told you that he would be able to apply the law to the facts as you asked them!" "And based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to 1, and this person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence to return a not guilty verdict." "I would go so far as to reluctantly say that the individual has made a false statement under oath to this court."

Matt Van Swol

194,795 просмотров • 6 дней назад

What’s going to happen next with the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial? Mark O’Mara, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, says he’s never seen this before: “There's no question, though it is my supposition, that that note said we are 11 to 1 for acquittal. And we can't get there because of this one juror.”
2:48

What’s going to happen next with the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial? Mark O’Mara, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, says he’s never seen this before: “There's no question, though it is my supposition, that that note said we are 11 to 1 for acquittal. And we can't get there because of this one juror.”

Erin Burnett OutFront

10,658 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Prediction time, because I’m not afraid to shoot my shot. I predict the jury will find Lindsay Clancy insane (not criminally responsible). There is also a possibility of a hung jury and a mistrial, but if that happens, the vote will be significantly in favor of the defense with only a few prosecution holdouts. My prediction is based on the law in Massachusetts, which requires to prosecution to prove a defendant is criminally responsible (sane) beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s a high burden and different than many states and federal law that put the burden on the defense to prove insanity by a preponderance or clear and convincing evidence. The defense presented enough evidence to satisfy both prongs of the insanity test: (1) not knowing right from wrong (thinking her kids would be safe), and (2) not being able to control her actions (male voice commanding her). Either is sufficient for insanity under the Model Penal Code, and the defense has raised reasonable doubt for both. 9 out of 12 female jurors is a good ratio for the defense too. The reality is that Clancy has more support among women. I spoke to Fox News about the possible jury verdicts. Spoiler alert: Lindsay being found not guilty and Patrick being prosecuted is not one of them. If you really believe that Patrick did it, then you may be insane.
3:21

Prediction time, because I’m not afraid to shoot my shot. I predict the jury will find Lindsay Clancy insane (not criminally responsible). There is also a possibility of a hung jury and a mistrial, but if that happens, the vote will be significantly in favor of the defense with only a few prosecution holdouts. My prediction is based on the law in Massachusetts, which requires to prosecution to prove a defendant is criminally responsible (sane) beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s a high burden and different than many states and federal law that put the burden on the defense to prove insanity by a preponderance or clear and convincing evidence. The defense presented enough evidence to satisfy both prongs of the insanity test: (1) not knowing right from wrong (thinking her kids would be safe), and (2) not being able to control her actions (male voice commanding her). Either is sufficient for insanity under the Model Penal Code, and the defense has raised reasonable doubt for both. 9 out of 12 female jurors is a good ratio for the defense too. The reality is that Clancy has more support among women. I spoke to Fox News about the possible jury verdicts. Spoiler alert: Lindsay being found not guilty and Patrick being prosecuted is not one of them. If you really believe that Patrick did it, then you may be insane.

Neama Rahmani

272,506 просмотров • 14 дней назад

🚨NEW: LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR SPEAKS OUT ON GMA THIS MORNING: Juror Nick Dargie, 25, spoke with ABC News’ Aaron Katersky about what happened inside the jury room before the Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial. Dargie says the jury ultimately stood 11–1 in favor of finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, with one juror holding out for conviction. He told ABC that he repeatedly asked the holdout juror to identify evidence or witness testimony supporting his position and said the juror could not do so. Dargie said: “There wasn’t a single piece of evidence or witness testimony that he used to prove why he was thinking the way he was.” The five-week trial ended in a mistrial on September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Lindsay Clancy remains charged in the 2023 deaths of her children Cora, Dawson and Callan Clancy. The parties are scheduled to return to court September 29 as the case moves forward.
4:45

🚨NEW: LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR SPEAKS OUT ON GMA THIS MORNING: Juror Nick Dargie, 25, spoke with ABC News’ Aaron Katersky about what happened inside the jury room before the Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial. Dargie says the jury ultimately stood 11–1 in favor of finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, with one juror holding out for conviction. He told ABC that he repeatedly asked the holdout juror to identify evidence or witness testimony supporting his position and said the juror could not do so. Dargie said: “There wasn’t a single piece of evidence or witness testimony that he used to prove why he was thinking the way he was.” The five-week trial ended in a mistrial on September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Lindsay Clancy remains charged in the 2023 deaths of her children Cora, Dawson and Callan Clancy. The parties are scheduled to return to court September 29 as the case moves forward.

Lindsay 🇺🇸

243,592 просмотров • 8 часов назад