正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Let’s stop playing… Ime Udoka — FIRED. Mel Tucker — FIRED. Sherrone Moore — FIRED. But Mike Vrabel? Handled differently… talk of “rehab,” not removal. Same type of allegations. Different outcomes. That’s not accountability — that’s selective enforcement. Black coaches lose careers. Others get second chances. Call it what...

1,609,630 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Sheriff Chris Swanson, the elected Sheriff of Genesee County, Michigan, is a career law-enforcement officer, not a pundit. He became nationally known in 2020 for prioritizing de-escalation during protests. What he says about the Minneapolis shooting directly exposes how bad MAGA-era policing policies fail. Swanson calls the shooting tragic but predictable. Masked federal agents in unmarked vehicles confronted a 37-year-old woman, gave unclear commands, and then fired three shots as her car was backing up and turning away. The agent who fired was not hit, not run over, and not in the vehicle’s path. Two shots were fired as the car was already driving away. That is not lawful deadly force. That is bad policy producing bad outcomes. Swanson is blunt about the force continuum. You do not shoot people who are fleeing. You do not shoot when you are not in danger. “Tough on crime” slogans do not override use-of-force standards, no matter how loudly MAGA politicians repeat them. What follows is worse. After the woman was shot and crashed, Swanson saw no attempt at life-saving aid. No urgency. No trauma response. He contrasts this with his own deputies, who once returned fire on a suspect who had already killed two people, then immediately tried to save his life anyway. That is professional policing. What happened in Minneapolis was not. He also points to missing body cams and officers leaving the scene instead of securing it for investigation. These are not accidents. They are the results of policies that reward aggression and optics over training and accountability. Swanson makes one thing clear. Calling this out is not anti-police. Blind loyalty is what damages law enforcement. Accountability is what protects it.

Pete

949,128 次观看 • 6 个月前

Why 2024 and 2025 felt almost the same. Because they were part of the same cycle, not separate chapters. Think of them as Part I and Part II of one lesson. 1. You were in a loop, not a journey Psychologically, 2024–2025 sat inside the same pattern: *Same type of people. *Same type of mental stress. *Same hopes, slightly rearranged *Same lessons repeating with different faces. Those years were about awareness, not reward. 2024 introduced the discomfort. 2025 intensified it. Both years were designed to: ♟️Expose emotional leaks. ♟️Show where effort wasn’t converting to value. ♟️Reveal who benefited from your over-giving. But neither year was meant to pay you. They were diagnostic years. That’s why no matter what you tried, the feeling stayed the same. ♟️... Why 2026 will be different. Because the cycle actually ends. 2026 marks a cycle exit, not continuation. It is going to feel heavier, but this time clearer. You will feel, see, and experience stability. 2024–2025 asked you to understand. 2026 demands you govern. Govern your money. Govern your time. Govern your access. That’s why it changes. Avoid anything that requires you to over-explain in 2026. Say fewer yeses. Choose fewer people. Keep money boring and controlled. 2026 is a year of authority. *Your emotional intelligence becomes financial intelligence. *Your past sacrifices will begin to reward you. That’s why it’s different.

🦉 🧘🏽‍♂️spiRituaL🧘🏽‍♂️

22,197 次观看 • 7 个月前