Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

levin's cognitive light cone concept makes it impossible to hold the perspective that "a human could understand the goal of any posthuman AGI" people who think humans can access the total state space of objectives literally just haven't thought about how wide that range is there are entire magazines...

36,901 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Levin's new episode "Stewarding the Flame" is out just now :) The focus: At the dawn of AGI, how can we make sure that the intelligences we're conjuring will add to a FLOURISHING of the process-of-life, rather than a brute optimizer that squashes life? As we get closer to superintelligence few topics are more pressing, and few people are thinking as deeply about the nature of life and intelligence as Levin. Big takeaways: -- Humans and non-human life will have to change if it wants to persist, this happens at every scale of the living process -- There is a much wider state-space of minds that we don't understand, but we should have a better grip on how intelligence works / comes into being before we build an AGI we don't control (because it might not carry the self-creating flame of life, it might be a brute optimizer) -- Levin is overall optimistic that the process of evolution and expanding life (even in forms that we don't understand today as "life" in a bio sense) will most likely continue to bubble up and continue to flourish in forms beyond us (i.e. the process is robust, and we'd REALLY have to mess something up to knock that trajectory off course) Some of the most important parts of this episode: 00:13:17 - Why MUST you transform if you wish to persist? 00:18:50 - Where does the self-preserving, self-expanding impulse "come from" in life? 00:33:30 - What do we need to understand better in order to make AGI "go well" (not just for how it treats humans, but for its ability to expand flourishing intelligence into the future)? 00:48:33 - [A deep-dive into the Flame paradigm (the process-of-life), and the Torch paradigm (pretending homo sapiens sapiens can/should rule all possible futures in a static hominid form).] There's a TON more in here, but this is a start. I sincerely hope you enjoy this episode with Mike!

Daniel Faggella

13,958 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles

13,096 views • 7 months ago

CNN’s Kasie Hunt insists the press talking about nothing else but themselves isn’t selfish or proof they don’t care about the American people. Instead, it’s to make sure the American people understand that they *need* the “independent” press to function, and that White House reporters have zero motives, “imperatives,” or “responsibility beyond telling the truth”... “I do think it is important to underscore, and we touched on this when we talked about the Xi visit, that there may be Chinese state media available to cover that. The point, the point of all of this is not that news organizations are focused on themselves. The point is that independent, objective news organizations are there to get answers for the people who are reading and watching and seeing, because it’s the American people who deserve independent eyes and ears, eyes and ears that are not government-controlled eyes and ears. At moments of our most critical national times, and we saw that probably most saliently on September 11th, when there was a pool traveling with President Bush to see Andy Card whisper in his ear as he read to schoolchildren that the second tower had fallen — or had been hit, and that America was under attack.” “The point of having a reporter from an independent news organization traveling with the President of the United States in that moment is because that reporter has no responsibility beyond telling the truth to the American people. They have no other imperative beyond that, and people who are operating on behalf of the government as government agents, employees, et cetera., they have potentially different motives. They are potentially protecting different things. They are potentially upholding different things, whereas reporters from independent news organizations are specifically devoted. And do we sometimes fall down on the job? We are all human. We are all human. We sometimes fall down on the job, but the job — the job is to do the very best you can, the very best we can to look and see at what is happening and to tell people what is happening without fear, without favor, and without putting anything ahead of them, without putting anything ahead of thinking about what does the audience need and deserve to know about their government? Because guess what? It’s them that are making the decisions about who should run it, who should be in charge. And that is why presidents, all presidents, this President care so much — okay — about what that reporting is and how it’s presented.”

Curtis Houck

51,091 views • 5 days ago