Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

"LGBTQ is the loop of control pill. 😳 Two men cannot reproduce, same applies to two women."🤔 Dr Umar Ifatunde drops nothing but gems. Penuel is good at what he does 😭 Link: #Sizokthola Julius Malema Khanyi Thando Lorch Mrs M #Manyonyoba #XRepo

YaseBlock B 🇸🇿

148,091 subscribers

250,515 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

#Sizokthola #Manyonyoba #XRepo

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Lwandle

Lwandle3 лет назад

Pheka!!!!!!

Фото профиля veronica

veronica3 лет назад

profound i mudt say, never saw Lgbtq like that

Фото профиля controller

controller3 лет назад

I absolutely agree. Few minutes in I thought WOW. Penuel is damn good at interviewing 💪🏿💪🏿

Фото профиля Paledi Mothapo

Paledi Mothapo3 лет назад

Lol I can’t believe people actually believe this nonsense. 😅😅 this guy is a conspiracy theorist, I know him i used to follow him.

Фото профиля Just Believe

Just Believe3 лет назад

I agree with his comments about the LGBTQ. We can't all agree

Фото профиля Jemor

Jemor3 лет назад

Dr Umar is damn right you just need to clean your mind up, it’s too dirty from western propaganda

Фото профиля Reginald Mangena

Reginald Mangena3 лет назад

Feminism, Female Empowerment was also the birth control idea of Gates/Kissinger...but short-sighted blacks will never see it because they have a daughter and that's their retirement plan: they are doing Gates' job and not even aware...

Фото профиля Kavi

Kavi3 лет назад

It’s all Eugenics

Фото профиля Sipho Cox Mlilo Zikode

Sipho Cox Mlilo Zikode3 лет назад

we saw that truth must be told

Фото профиля Raisibe

Raisibe3 лет назад

Is true. Why is Julius Malema supporting LGBTQ? And still call himself Pan-African?

Похожие видео

DR Umar calls Elon Musk a beneficiary of apartheid & white privilege?😳😭 "If Elon Musk wants to impress me - take some of your daddy's money & give it back to South Africa so we can build jobs for these unemployed men & women" Khanyi Julius Malema #Sizokthola Mrs M #Manyonyoba

DR Umar calls Elon Musk a beneficiary of apartheid & white privilege?😳😭 "If Elon Musk wants to impress me - take some of your daddy's money & give it back to South Africa so we can build jobs for these unemployed men & women" Khanyi Julius Malema #Sizokthola Mrs M #Manyonyoba

YaseBlock B 🇸🇿

113,305 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Andrew Wilson claims to hate feminism but yet repeatedly shows he has the same view of biblical womanhood that feminists do. He denigrates homemaking in the same fashion Chelsea Handler would. You cannot claim to be against feminism while scoffing at motherhood & homemaking as less than. You either appreciate God’s design for women, or you have contempt for it, and here, Andrew clearly had contempt for it. The burden that men carry is much greater than the burden women carry in many areas—thats true—but the same can be said in reverse. Stop making everything a competition between the sexes, otherwise it is just two sides of the same god-hating coin.

Andrew Wilson claims to hate feminism but yet repeatedly shows he has the same view of biblical womanhood that feminists do. He denigrates homemaking in the same fashion Chelsea Handler would. You cannot claim to be against feminism while scoffing at motherhood & homemaking as less than. You either appreciate God’s design for women, or you have contempt for it, and here, Andrew clearly had contempt for it. The burden that men carry is much greater than the burden women carry in many areas—thats true—but the same can be said in reverse. Stop making everything a competition between the sexes, otherwise it is just two sides of the same god-hating coin.

Lizzie Marbach

43,462 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

These two guys were on their way to their fishing spot. They came to a stop sign at the same time as this bicyclist and blew through his stop sign and didn’t stop. When the men passed him they yelled at him for not stopping. So this guy followed them to their fishing spot. The two men exchange pleasantries and the guy on the bike tells them he never stops and they shouldn’t be yelling at him or anyone. The one man tells him he is just like everyone else and he has to obey the traffic laws. At one point the guy on the bike tells the two men he can take them both in a fight. The one man walks off to go fishing. 😳 The guy on the bike does not have the right of way. Bicyclists are like automobiles and must follow all traffic laws. Biker fatigue is real. 💯 So who do you side with? Who is the real moron? 🤔

These two guys were on their way to their fishing spot. They came to a stop sign at the same time as this bicyclist and blew through his stop sign and didn’t stop. When the men passed him they yelled at him for not stopping. So this guy followed them to their fishing spot. The two men exchange pleasantries and the guy on the bike tells them he never stops and they shouldn’t be yelling at him or anyone. The one man tells him he is just like everyone else and he has to obey the traffic laws. At one point the guy on the bike tells the two men he can take them both in a fight. The one man walks off to go fishing. 😳 The guy on the bike does not have the right of way. Bicyclists are like automobiles and must follow all traffic laws. Biker fatigue is real. 💯 So who do you side with? Who is the real moron? 🤔

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

24,320 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

What Is a Woman According to Islam? Yemen’s Muslim Brotherhood Leader Has the Answer: Women Are Stupid Beings With “Dysfunctional Brains”, Who Need Men to Control Them This is Islamic justice in action, straight from the mouth of Yemeni Muslim Brotherhood leader Al-Zindani. According to him, women are less human because Allah created them with fewer brain features than men. He claims women cannot talk and remember at the same time, so when they speak, their memory data gets lost. This is why in Islam a girl is considered a woman from the age of nine. Not because she is more mature, but because Muslims believe she will never undergo meaningful brain development anyway. She will always remain in need of a male guardian to control and use her. The result under Sharia? A woman who is raped cannot even testify in her own defense, because she cannot remember anything anyway while screaming in pain. The rapist is treated as the victim, and the woman is punished for provoking him. If the rapist is married, she is stoned to death for adultery. This is the Islamic morality that Western leftists rush to defend.

What Is a Woman According to Islam? Yemen’s Muslim Brotherhood Leader Has the Answer: Women Are Stupid Beings With “Dysfunctional Brains”, Who Need Men to Control Them This is Islamic justice in action, straight from the mouth of Yemeni Muslim Brotherhood leader Al-Zindani. According to him, women are less human because Allah created them with fewer brain features than men. He claims women cannot talk and remember at the same time, so when they speak, their memory data gets lost. This is why in Islam a girl is considered a woman from the age of nine. Not because she is more mature, but because Muslims believe she will never undergo meaningful brain development anyway. She will always remain in need of a male guardian to control and use her. The result under Sharia? A woman who is raped cannot even testify in her own defense, because she cannot remember anything anyway while screaming in pain. The rapist is treated as the victim, and the woman is punished for provoking him. If the rapist is married, she is stoned to death for adultery. This is the Islamic morality that Western leftists rush to defend.

Liza Rosen

115,718 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

So Enioluwa is Pricilla Ojo’s CHIEF BRIDESMAID. 😭 If a man comes to my wedding and introduces himself as my wife’s CHIEF BRIDESMAID , I am suspending the wedding to design his back with Oraimo Cord . Don’t you have shame? Men of the past were conquering territories and winning wars while women were at home enjoying soft life. The dignity of women is slowly being stolen by men in this generation and you see women cheering and clapping. I mean even if you are so close to the couple and you want to be an integral part of the wedding you can be among the groomsmen but No, you want to steal the very spotlight that belongs to a woman, the CHIEF BRIDESMAID. The funny part is that the victims-the women keep on awwing and nudging such men on. Before they realize what is happening it will be too late. Watch how same women will even attack me for this two cents.

So Enioluwa is Pricilla Ojo’s CHIEF BRIDESMAID. 😭 If a man comes to my wedding and introduces himself as my wife’s CHIEF BRIDESMAID , I am suspending the wedding to design his back with Oraimo Cord . Don’t you have shame? Men of the past were conquering territories and winning wars while women were at home enjoying soft life. The dignity of women is slowly being stolen by men in this generation and you see women cheering and clapping. I mean even if you are so close to the couple and you want to be an integral part of the wedding you can be among the groomsmen but No, you want to steal the very spotlight that belongs to a woman, the CHIEF BRIDESMAID. The funny part is that the victims-the women keep on awwing and nudging such men on. Before they realize what is happening it will be too late. Watch how same women will even attack me for this two cents.

Dr Penking™

831,082 просмотров • 1 год назад

Our thoughts and prayers remain with KZN Legislator Speaker, Ms Nontembeko Nothemba Boyce, who during the 16 days of activism for no violence against women and children was harassed, pushed, beaten by Jacob Zuma owned MKP members and Julius Malema owned EFF members. A 50 year old single mother quivering saying the hard part will be to explain to her two sons that is not how you treat a lady. That is never a solution. Mentally and emotionally scared but she said she will definitely have this talk with her boys. Our hearts and prayers are with you Ma Nothemba Boyce. Jacob Zuma and Julius Malema a menace to this country. They will pay. They will pay. You should get all the support needed. The help. Your sons who possibly watched on TV, are traumatised at what Jacob Zuma owned MKP and Julius Malema EFF did to you. Cry the beloved country 💔😭

Our thoughts and prayers remain with KZN Legislator Speaker, Ms Nontembeko Nothemba Boyce, who during the 16 days of activism for no violence against women and children was harassed, pushed, beaten by Jacob Zuma owned MKP members and Julius Malema owned EFF members. A 50 year old single mother quivering saying the hard part will be to explain to her two sons that is not how you treat a lady. That is never a solution. Mentally and emotionally scared but she said she will definitely have this talk with her boys. Our hearts and prayers are with you Ma Nothemba Boyce. Jacob Zuma and Julius Malema a menace to this country. They will pay. They will pay. You should get all the support needed. The help. Your sons who possibly watched on TV, are traumatised at what Jacob Zuma owned MKP and Julius Malema EFF did to you. Cry the beloved country 💔😭

Goolam

27,869 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Donald J. #Trump targets #PopeLeo XIV—and in doing so, reveals a deeper unease. When political power turns against a moral voice, it is often because it cannot contain it. Trump does not argue with Leo; he implores him to return to a language he can control. But the Pope speaks another language, one that cannot be reduced to the grammar of force, security, or national interest. In this sense, the attack is a declaration of impotence. Unable to absorb that voice, power tries to delegitimize it. Yet in doing so, it implicitly acknowledges its weight. If Leo were irrelevant, he would not deserve a word. Instead, he is invoked, named, opposed—a sign that his words matter. This is where the Church’s moral force emerges. Not as a counter-power, but as a space in which power is judged by a standard it does not control. Leo does not respond on the terrain of polemics, and for that very reason remains beyond its grasp. He is free. And that freedom—unarmed and disarming—is perhaps what most unsettles. And, at the same time, what matters most.

Donald J. #Trump targets #PopeLeo XIV—and in doing so, reveals a deeper unease. When political power turns against a moral voice, it is often because it cannot contain it. Trump does not argue with Leo; he implores him to return to a language he can control. But the Pope speaks another language, one that cannot be reduced to the grammar of force, security, or national interest. In this sense, the attack is a declaration of impotence. Unable to absorb that voice, power tries to delegitimize it. Yet in doing so, it implicitly acknowledges its weight. If Leo were irrelevant, he would not deserve a word. Instead, he is invoked, named, opposed—a sign that his words matter. This is where the Church’s moral force emerges. Not as a counter-power, but as a space in which power is judged by a standard it does not control. Leo does not respond on the terrain of polemics, and for that very reason remains beyond its grasp. He is free. And that freedom—unarmed and disarming—is perhaps what most unsettles. And, at the same time, what matters most.

Antonio Spadaro

201,847 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dr. Umar can't tell Black Women the truth cuz he needs as many of them as possible to send their kids to his school so he can get as much money from the gov't as possible. This clip is proof that Black Men don't even have allies amongst ourselves. There's no way you telling me that childless Black Men are responsible for the REPEATED poor pussy management of Black Women. No other race or culture would say something as insane as this. She is responsible for the men that go in & children that come out of her. Sending responsible & successful Black men on a dummy mission to "save the community" after you admit Black Women have ran it in the ground for half a century is just unbelievable. Black women's poor choices in men created COPIES of those men & even then they are the MINORITY that the MAJORITY of Black women want. There are far too many responsible & GOOD Black men out here that Black women don't want because he's not a street/criminal nigga. Outside pro athletes look at what type of niggas have the most baby mommas? I rest my case.

Dr. Umar can't tell Black Women the truth cuz he needs as many of them as possible to send their kids to his school so he can get as much money from the gov't as possible. This clip is proof that Black Men don't even have allies amongst ourselves. There's no way you telling me that childless Black Men are responsible for the REPEATED poor pussy management of Black Women. No other race or culture would say something as insane as this. She is responsible for the men that go in & children that come out of her. Sending responsible & successful Black men on a dummy mission to "save the community" after you admit Black Women have ran it in the ground for half a century is just unbelievable. Black women's poor choices in men created COPIES of those men & even then they are the MINORITY that the MAJORITY of Black women want. There are far too many responsible & GOOD Black men out here that Black women don't want because he's not a street/criminal nigga. Outside pro athletes look at what type of niggas have the most baby mommas? I rest my case.

MrFantastic824 B.A.B.G.

609,350 просмотров • 3 лет назад

😳😳😳😳 PRINCIPAL RACHEL, REALLY? There is a video making the rounds of Principal Rachael Alamu during her thanksgiving service. Mrs. Rachael, the principal and victim of the Oriire school abduction said the kidnappers were vehemently upset that military aircraft was hovering over their location and threatened to execute more hostages. In her own words: "The leader approached and said, 'Principal, come here.' I was trembling because I understood the implications. When I reached him, he stated, 'Look at what your government has done; I will kill one of you today.' I just fell on the floor and begged, saying, 'I BROUGHT FOUR MEN, and only two are left, and you still want to kill another one?” Principal, you don’t mean it. YOU BROUGHT FOUR MEN? These comments of Madam Rachel are indicting. “I brought four men…the knowledge of the other two will continue to hunt me…”

😳😳😳😳 PRINCIPAL RACHEL, REALLY? There is a video making the rounds of Principal Rachael Alamu during her thanksgiving service. Mrs. Rachael, the principal and victim of the Oriire school abduction said the kidnappers were vehemently upset that military aircraft was hovering over their location and threatened to execute more hostages. In her own words: "The leader approached and said, 'Principal, come here.' I was trembling because I understood the implications. When I reached him, he stated, 'Look at what your government has done; I will kill one of you today.' I just fell on the floor and begged, saying, 'I BROUGHT FOUR MEN, and only two are left, and you still want to kill another one?” Principal, you don’t mean it. YOU BROUGHT FOUR MEN? These comments of Madam Rachel are indicting. “I brought four men…the knowledge of the other two will continue to hunt me…”

David Brand, MD

54,703 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mmmm 🤔🚨: How many of you actually think Thabo Bester is naturally intelligent? Imagine escaping a maximum security prison and moving around like nothing happened?? 😭 That alone is madness… This same guy goes to court, starts defying his weak own lawyers, switches the script mid-case and begins representing himself like he passed LLB at Wits overnight Like listen to how articulate he is… confident, calculated, speaking like someone who knows the system inside out 😳 T Now the question is… is this pure intelligence, or is it a dangerous mix of confidence, exposure and knowing how broken the system is? . Because not everyone can do that… but also, not everyone gets the same "opportunities" to do that 😅

Mmmm 🤔🚨: How many of you actually think Thabo Bester is naturally intelligent? Imagine escaping a maximum security prison and moving around like nothing happened?? 😭 That alone is madness… This same guy goes to court, starts defying his weak own lawyers, switches the script mid-case and begins representing himself like he passed LLB at Wits overnight Like listen to how articulate he is… confident, calculated, speaking like someone who knows the system inside out 😳 T Now the question is… is this pure intelligence, or is it a dangerous mix of confidence, exposure and knowing how broken the system is? . Because not everyone can do that… but also, not everyone gets the same "opportunities" to do that 😅

In A Nutshell🥜

16,695 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 BOOM: Elon Musk amplifies the moment Sec. Marco Rubio said it PERFECTLY on communists and leftist terrorists "One of the criticisms you sometimes hear of communism is that it 'sounds good in theory, but it never works in practice.' That's actually NOT TRUE. Communism does NOT sound good in theory. The world that envisions for all of us is small, flat, gray, leveled of all exception, drained of all that is good and noble in the human soul." "The world communism envisions is a world without God." "[Leftist terrorism] is a revolt of the worst against the best, a revolt of the weak and the cowardly against the strong and the good." "It is perpetrated by those who cannot build, who cannot create, who cannot achieve great things and take their revenge upon the world for their own inadequacy by seeking to destroy those who can!" "The fundamental character is always the same. It's always the same. It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice and liberation and overwhelming need to tear down what greater men have built, to wreck what is beautiful and what is right on behalf of people who are only filled with ugliness and have nothing else to offer the world." "Through violence and through terror, they once again seek to impose their ugliness on all of us. The old dogma was wrong. The old dogma was wrong. None of this is driven by idealism. It is not utopian." 🔥🔥🇺🇸

🚨 BOOM: Elon Musk amplifies the moment Sec. Marco Rubio said it PERFECTLY on communists and leftist terrorists "One of the criticisms you sometimes hear of communism is that it 'sounds good in theory, but it never works in practice.' That's actually NOT TRUE. Communism does NOT sound good in theory. The world that envisions for all of us is small, flat, gray, leveled of all exception, drained of all that is good and noble in the human soul." "The world communism envisions is a world without God." "[Leftist terrorism] is a revolt of the worst against the best, a revolt of the weak and the cowardly against the strong and the good." "It is perpetrated by those who cannot build, who cannot create, who cannot achieve great things and take their revenge upon the world for their own inadequacy by seeking to destroy those who can!" "The fundamental character is always the same. It's always the same. It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice and liberation and overwhelming need to tear down what greater men have built, to wreck what is beautiful and what is right on behalf of people who are only filled with ugliness and have nothing else to offer the world." "Through violence and through terror, they once again seek to impose their ugliness on all of us. The old dogma was wrong. The old dogma was wrong. None of this is driven by idealism. It is not utopian." 🔥🔥🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

191,082 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"The Betrayal at Falkirk" – Mel Gibson does not film a hero confronting betrayal. He films the one thing betrayal cannot take from a man. Many people remember the Battle of Falkirk for the moment William Wallace tears the helmet from a masked knight. Beneath it is Robert the Bruce. The man in whom Wallace had placed his greatest hope. It is the most devastating betrayal in Braveheart. Yet what makes this one of the film's defining moments is not the betrayal itself. It is Wallace's response. He does not strike. He does not condemn. He says nothing. He simply looks at Robert. Then he collapses. That is the true center of the scene. Mel Gibson could have ended this moment with rage. With vengeance. With a hero delivering justice to a traitor. Instead, he strips all of that away. He leaves only two men facing one another. One has betrayed the cause they once shared. The other has watched his greatest hope fall apart before his eyes. At that moment, the most important battle is no longer being fought on the battlefield. It is being fought within the human heart. What brings Wallace to his knees is not a sword. It is the truth. Not simply that he has lost an ally, but that the man he believed could one day carry Scotland's future has chosen another path. Mel Gibson never turns Wallace into a hero who feels no pain. He allows him to be devastated. But he also shows something that never falls. Betrayal may break Wallace's heart. It cannot break his character. It cannot turn him into a man consumed by vengeance. It cannot make him abandon the very principles for which he has fought. Wallace's body collapses. His character does not. That is also the moment Robert the Bruce begins to change. Mel Gibson does not transform him through a speech. Nor simply because Wallace spares his life. Robert changes because, for the first time, he encounters a man whose character cannot be bent by circumstance. All his life, Robert has been taught to measure every decision by power, advantage, and political necessity. Wallace reveals another possibility. That there are people who refuse to let circumstances decide who they are. They let their character decide instead. Wallace does not persuade Robert with words. He forces him to confront a far more difficult question: What kind of man do I want to become? That is why Robert ultimately becomes the man who fulfills the dream Wallace never lives to see. Not because Wallace leaves him a crown. But because he leaves him something far greater. A standard. The example of a man who could lose everything without losing himself. Perhaps that is why Mel Gibson does not end the Falkirk sequence with victory. He ends it with a man brought to his knees. Because sometimes adversity is not there to reveal how strong a person is. It is there to reveal what within them cannot be taken away. And in the end, it is precisely that which cannot be taken away that possesses the power to transform another human being— and, ultimately, to change the course of history. Name movie: Braveheart (1995)

"The Betrayal at Falkirk" – Mel Gibson does not film a hero confronting betrayal. He films the one thing betrayal cannot take from a man. Many people remember the Battle of Falkirk for the moment William Wallace tears the helmet from a masked knight. Beneath it is Robert the Bruce. The man in whom Wallace had placed his greatest hope. It is the most devastating betrayal in Braveheart. Yet what makes this one of the film's defining moments is not the betrayal itself. It is Wallace's response. He does not strike. He does not condemn. He says nothing. He simply looks at Robert. Then he collapses. That is the true center of the scene. Mel Gibson could have ended this moment with rage. With vengeance. With a hero delivering justice to a traitor. Instead, he strips all of that away. He leaves only two men facing one another. One has betrayed the cause they once shared. The other has watched his greatest hope fall apart before his eyes. At that moment, the most important battle is no longer being fought on the battlefield. It is being fought within the human heart. What brings Wallace to his knees is not a sword. It is the truth. Not simply that he has lost an ally, but that the man he believed could one day carry Scotland's future has chosen another path. Mel Gibson never turns Wallace into a hero who feels no pain. He allows him to be devastated. But he also shows something that never falls. Betrayal may break Wallace's heart. It cannot break his character. It cannot turn him into a man consumed by vengeance. It cannot make him abandon the very principles for which he has fought. Wallace's body collapses. His character does not. That is also the moment Robert the Bruce begins to change. Mel Gibson does not transform him through a speech. Nor simply because Wallace spares his life. Robert changes because, for the first time, he encounters a man whose character cannot be bent by circumstance. All his life, Robert has been taught to measure every decision by power, advantage, and political necessity. Wallace reveals another possibility. That there are people who refuse to let circumstances decide who they are. They let their character decide instead. Wallace does not persuade Robert with words. He forces him to confront a far more difficult question: What kind of man do I want to become? That is why Robert ultimately becomes the man who fulfills the dream Wallace never lives to see. Not because Wallace leaves him a crown. But because he leaves him something far greater. A standard. The example of a man who could lose everything without losing himself. Perhaps that is why Mel Gibson does not end the Falkirk sequence with victory. He ends it with a man brought to his knees. Because sometimes adversity is not there to reveal how strong a person is. It is there to reveal what within them cannot be taken away. And in the end, it is precisely that which cannot be taken away that possesses the power to transform another human being— and, ultimately, to change the course of history. Name movie: Braveheart (1995)

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

71,222 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

💡 Now that this is out, it is safe to share. 💡 THIS is why we are going to Reclaim our Elections. Because we MUST DO SO in order to break up and destroy the network. Real evil DOES exist. In ways most people cannot comprehend. And these same people that have been doing this all behind our backs have been getting away with it because they also took control of our elections decades ago. It all ends now. Citizens, DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO RECLAIM YOUR ELECTIONS. Failure is NOT an option. Evil Prevails when Good Men (and women) do Nothing. What are YOU going to do? Step 1, share this everywhere. Step 2, get involved with those that are working to put Elections back in to your hands, the hands of the Citizens. Then we vote, and start wiping our Nation free of these demons.

💡 Now that this is out, it is safe to share. 💡 THIS is why we are going to Reclaim our Elections. Because we MUST DO SO in order to break up and destroy the network. Real evil DOES exist. In ways most people cannot comprehend. And these same people that have been doing this all behind our backs have been getting away with it because they also took control of our elections decades ago. It all ends now. Citizens, DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO RECLAIM YOUR ELECTIONS. Failure is NOT an option. Evil Prevails when Good Men (and women) do Nothing. What are YOU going to do? Step 1, share this everywhere. Step 2, get involved with those that are working to put Elections back in to your hands, the hands of the Citizens. Then we vote, and start wiping our Nation free of these demons.

Mark Cook

40,749 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dr. Roman Yampolskiy, computer scientist who coined the term "AI safety," 15 years in the field: "There is no plan B. You cannot retrain." For thirty years the script was the same. Your job gets automated, you retrain for the next one. Learn to code. Then prompt engineering. Then agent design. He walks through how each of those escape hatches closed in under two years. The retraining target keeps getting eaten before you arrive. His point is not that your job vanishes. It is that the place you were going to run to vanishes at the same time. So the question stops being which skill is safe. There is no safe square on the board. The only move left is to decide what you do when the board itself is gone.

Dr. Roman Yampolskiy, computer scientist who coined the term "AI safety," 15 years in the field: "There is no plan B. You cannot retrain." For thirty years the script was the same. Your job gets automated, you retrain for the next one. Learn to code. Then prompt engineering. Then agent design. He walks through how each of those escape hatches closed in under two years. The retraining target keeps getting eaten before you arrive. His point is not that your job vanishes. It is that the place you were going to run to vanishes at the same time. So the question stops being which skill is safe. There is no safe square on the board. The only move left is to decide what you do when the board itself is gone.

zostaff

29,901 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨Ben Shapiro details why he called out Megyn Kelly at TPUSA "That was about Candace Owens' attacks on Erika Kirk." "I think it is evil what Candace Owens has done to Charlie Kirk's family." "Charlie was very good at relationship building. And what that meant was he was often texting two totally conflicting things to two different people at the same time." "If you see some of the texts Candace has released about what they were saying about Daily Wire. I mean, Charlie texted with us too and I don't release private text. But I can say that he was not saying the same thing..." "The critique that I had of Megyn was that she was allowing the personal relationships with some people to trump the truth and basic deceny." Patrick Bet-David Ben Shapiro Megyn Kelly Candace Owens

🚨Ben Shapiro details why he called out Megyn Kelly at TPUSA "That was about Candace Owens' attacks on Erika Kirk." "I think it is evil what Candace Owens has done to Charlie Kirk's family." "Charlie was very good at relationship building. And what that meant was he was often texting two totally conflicting things to two different people at the same time." "If you see some of the texts Candace has released about what they were saying about Daily Wire. I mean, Charlie texted with us too and I don't release private text. But I can say that he was not saying the same thing..." "The critique that I had of Megyn was that she was allowing the personal relationships with some people to trump the truth and basic deceny." Patrick Bet-David Ben Shapiro Megyn Kelly Candace Owens

KanekoaTheGreat

132,314 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Warning Texas! Radical Imam Yasir Qadhi: Muslims Should NEVER Marry Non-Muslims 🔴 This is one of the men leading the 402-acre Sharia City project in Texas. 🔴 This is the man who sits on the Fiqh Council of North America, pushing for the expansion of Sharia in the U.S. 🔴 This is the man ensuring that Islam does not integrate—but dominates. At Epic Mosque, Yasir Qadhi made it clear: ✅ Muslim men should NOT marry Christian or Jewish women in the West. ✅ Muslim women are NEVER allowed to marry non-Muslim men. ✅ Islam must rule the household—because non-Muslims cannot be trusted with authority. What Does He Mean by "Katabi" (Ahl al-Kitab)? When Qadhi says “Katabi”, he means “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians. Islamic law allows Muslim men to marry Christian or Jewish women only under strict conditions. But Qadhi goes further—saying even that should be banned in the West. And for Muslim women? It is NEVER allowed. Because a non-Muslim man would have authority over a Muslim woman—and that is unacceptable in Islam. And he admits this is not just his opinion—this is the unanimous ruling of Islamic law. This Isn’t About Marriage—It’s About Islamic Supremacy. 🚨 Qadhi says Muslim “authority” must be preserved. 🚨 He rejects integration, insisting that Islam must control the family. 🚨 He warns that interfaith marriage threatens Islamic dominance. ❌ Non-Muslims are NOT equals. ❌ Interfaith relationships are a danger to Islam. ❌ Islamic law must take precedence—even in America. This isn’t about religion. It’s about control. And this is the radical helping to build a 1,000+ home Sharia enclave in Texas—where non-Muslims will always be outsiders. America, wake up. This is political Islam gaining ground—on U.S. soil.

Warning Texas! Radical Imam Yasir Qadhi: Muslims Should NEVER Marry Non-Muslims 🔴 This is one of the men leading the 402-acre Sharia City project in Texas. 🔴 This is the man who sits on the Fiqh Council of North America, pushing for the expansion of Sharia in the U.S. 🔴 This is the man ensuring that Islam does not integrate—but dominates. At Epic Mosque, Yasir Qadhi made it clear: ✅ Muslim men should NOT marry Christian or Jewish women in the West. ✅ Muslim women are NEVER allowed to marry non-Muslim men. ✅ Islam must rule the household—because non-Muslims cannot be trusted with authority. What Does He Mean by "Katabi" (Ahl al-Kitab)? When Qadhi says “Katabi”, he means “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians. Islamic law allows Muslim men to marry Christian or Jewish women only under strict conditions. But Qadhi goes further—saying even that should be banned in the West. And for Muslim women? It is NEVER allowed. Because a non-Muslim man would have authority over a Muslim woman—and that is unacceptable in Islam. And he admits this is not just his opinion—this is the unanimous ruling of Islamic law. This Isn’t About Marriage—It’s About Islamic Supremacy. 🚨 Qadhi says Muslim “authority” must be preserved. 🚨 He rejects integration, insisting that Islam must control the family. 🚨 He warns that interfaith marriage threatens Islamic dominance. ❌ Non-Muslims are NOT equals. ❌ Interfaith relationships are a danger to Islam. ❌ Islamic law must take precedence—even in America. This isn’t about religion. It’s about control. And this is the radical helping to build a 1,000+ home Sharia enclave in Texas—where non-Muslims will always be outsiders. America, wake up. This is political Islam gaining ground—on U.S. soil.

Amy Mek

137,705 просмотров • 1 год назад

One of the way wives keep men under their control is by reducing to nothing the validation they give to eventually breadcrumb them (because women feel that it has a meaning for the man- and they hoard the stuff they feel the man wants - as he is giving that power to her, and most women relish keeping the power bestowed to them by the man) …so men seek their emotional needs ielsewhere. What people get wrong when it comes to guys seeing prostitutes, it actually not as much about sex as they may believe, but about the attention, appreciation, and recognition these women give him. More male clients than not use female prostitutes as some proxy therapists with benefits. It is surprising to know how some guys would order an hour and just lay on the bed with them just for some rented affection or an empathetic ear. Here, it is sugar babies, but the process is the same, he rents to feel things his wife can’t provide.

One of the way wives keep men under their control is by reducing to nothing the validation they give to eventually breadcrumb them (because women feel that it has a meaning for the man- and they hoard the stuff they feel the man wants - as he is giving that power to her, and most women relish keeping the power bestowed to them by the man) …so men seek their emotional needs ielsewhere. What people get wrong when it comes to guys seeing prostitutes, it actually not as much about sex as they may believe, but about the attention, appreciation, and recognition these women give him. More male clients than not use female prostitutes as some proxy therapists with benefits. It is surprising to know how some guys would order an hour and just lay on the bed with them just for some rented affection or an empathetic ear. Here, it is sugar babies, but the process is the same, he rents to feel things his wife can’t provide.

French OG

34,451 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This man was shopping at his local store and on the way out this is what he saw. This woman was being accused of shoplifting. The Loss Prevention team tried to talk to her but she was resisting and not cooperating and at one point tried to flee. So two men entered a wrestling match with this woman, you can hear her proclaim that they are hurting her. The man pulls out his phone to record it, another employee is now trying to block his recording. He holds a piece of clothing in front of the camera to block him from recording what is going on. He even goes as far as saying she’s under arrest even though the police aren’t there yet. The man recording was asked to leave and was escorted out even though he did nothing wrong. At what point would the store not want this man recording, were they doing something they weren’t supposed to do, should he have helped her?

This man was shopping at his local store and on the way out this is what he saw. This woman was being accused of shoplifting. The Loss Prevention team tried to talk to her but she was resisting and not cooperating and at one point tried to flee. So two men entered a wrestling match with this woman, you can hear her proclaim that they are hurting her. The man pulls out his phone to record it, another employee is now trying to block his recording. He holds a piece of clothing in front of the camera to block him from recording what is going on. He even goes as far as saying she’s under arrest even though the police aren’t there yet. The man recording was asked to leave and was escorted out even though he did nothing wrong. At what point would the store not want this man recording, were they doing something they weren’t supposed to do, should he have helped her?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

89,375 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

context engineering vs graph engineering. every few months the list gets a new word and everyone treats it as a replacement for the last one. these two are not on the same list. one decides what the model sees this turn, the other decides what exists at all. the cleanest way to tell them apart is to ask what a single unit of work looks like. > context engineering is the window the window opens empty, every single time. you assemble what goes in it. the prompt, the docs, the history, the tool results. the assembling is the work. the window only grows. it never shrinks on its own, so eventually something gets dropped. usually from the middle. usually without telling you. then the turn ends and the window is thrown away. not archived, thrown away. the next turn opens empty again and you re-explain what you already explained. good context engineering is knowing what to leave out, not what to pack in. the unit of work is one window. > graph engineering is the structure the same material arrives from the same sources. instead of packing it into a window, you pull entities out of it, resolve the duplicates into one node, and write typed edges between them. nothing here is stored as text you hope to find again. it is stored as a thing with a name and its connections to other things. when the turn ends, the graph is still there. the next turn does not start from zero. it starts by querying what already exists, and the query walks edges instead of guessing at similarity. good graph engineering is deciding what counts as the same thing twice. the unit of work is one relationship. > they are not alternatives the graph is what refills the window. context engineering decides what fits. graph engineering decides what there is to choose from. remove the graph and every session starts blind. remove the context work and the best structure in the world arrives as an unreadable dump. that also tells you which one broke. the answer drifted from what you actually said, or forgot something from this same session. that is the window. the answer is coherent but invents a connection that does not exist, or cannot join two facts it has clearly seen. that is the structure. people debug the prompt because the prompt is the easiest thing to edit. it keeps taking the blame for failures that live a layer down. save this - then read the full breakdown below

context engineering vs graph engineering. every few months the list gets a new word and everyone treats it as a replacement for the last one. these two are not on the same list. one decides what the model sees this turn, the other decides what exists at all. the cleanest way to tell them apart is to ask what a single unit of work looks like. > context engineering is the window the window opens empty, every single time. you assemble what goes in it. the prompt, the docs, the history, the tool results. the assembling is the work. the window only grows. it never shrinks on its own, so eventually something gets dropped. usually from the middle. usually without telling you. then the turn ends and the window is thrown away. not archived, thrown away. the next turn opens empty again and you re-explain what you already explained. good context engineering is knowing what to leave out, not what to pack in. the unit of work is one window. > graph engineering is the structure the same material arrives from the same sources. instead of packing it into a window, you pull entities out of it, resolve the duplicates into one node, and write typed edges between them. nothing here is stored as text you hope to find again. it is stored as a thing with a name and its connections to other things. when the turn ends, the graph is still there. the next turn does not start from zero. it starts by querying what already exists, and the query walks edges instead of guessing at similarity. good graph engineering is deciding what counts as the same thing twice. the unit of work is one relationship. > they are not alternatives the graph is what refills the window. context engineering decides what fits. graph engineering decides what there is to choose from. remove the graph and every session starts blind. remove the context work and the best structure in the world arrives as an unreadable dump. that also tells you which one broke. the answer drifted from what you actually said, or forgot something from this same session. that is the window. the answer is coherent but invents a connection that does not exist, or cannot join two facts it has clearly seen. that is the structure. people debug the prompt because the prompt is the easiest thing to edit. it keeps taking the blame for failures that live a layer down. save this - then read the full breakdown below

Hanako

19,160 просмотров • 28 дней назад