Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Li Auto officially released a video comparing the performance of the Li L9 Livis and the NIO ES9 on a wavy road. However, in the video, the NIO ES9 did not have its “Sky Mode” activated, and its active suspension was not operating at all. A few days ago,... show more
14,993 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
23 Yorum

Update: Li Auto has just taken down this video from WeChat. $LI

If Li Auto spent more time on its own R&D, they would be in a better position today..

Interesting comparison choice. If you need to test against an ES9 with Sky Mode disabled to make your car look better, consumers will notice. In the end, this is just free advertising for NIO. #NIO

Trying to deceive the audience, horrible brand

LiAuto was called out by NIO

Nio‘s official reaction:

But that is fraud, no?

A netizen identified and contacted the owner of the NIO ES9 shown in the video. According to him, he thought the car was only being borrowed for photos and was unaware that it would be used in a test. $NIO

Li Auto uses tactics which bring disrepute to the whole auto industry…when they realize only way to win is with a good product…it will be way too late for them 👀

#NIO #LI

Lol li auto is such a shit company .

I can’t believe a company would stoop that low

$LI deserves everything bad that is happening to them. Bunch of shameless people.

They deserve to be left behind

😂😂 if anyone wants to see the ES9 just watch richard hammond . its not that hard.

理想这个公司的企业文化真的是垃圾。理想汽车是我最讨厌品牌。

I would never be surprised if Li auto took some parts of Shorting Nio. This company has no moral or ethical .

Typical from dirty li autio

As a shareholder of Li Auto and NIO, I am shameful for this video.

Nevertheless Li Auto is selling very good, same with Tesla... Why chinese sisters and bothers buying these brands is a mystery for me. Li Auto is known for spreading fake news about #NIO on regular basis

What is wrong with this company?

What a deceptive advertisement by Liauto!! Shame on them

😂😂😂it’s like the building structure is being designed with stabiliser to absorbs earthquake, and you remove the stabiliser to prove that it does not able to absorb the earthquake. Whoever’s making a claim is a very poor person with technical assessment abilities.

