正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Lil Nas X stripped completely n*ked before arrest while rapping Nicki Minaj’s “Monster” verse. [🎥: TMZ)

19,689 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Ray Daniels has told this story on multiple podcasts because it’s one of the cleanest examples of how “pop splits” versus “urban splits” actually change the check‼️. The song is Nicki Minaj’s “Only” from *The Pinkprint* (2014) — the one with Drake, Lil Wayne, and Chris Brown on the hook‼️. Official writers are Nicki, Drake, Wayne, Dr. Luke, Cirkut, JMIKE, Theron Thomas, and Timothy Thomas (the R. City brothers)‼️. Ray Daniels manages/works with the Thomas brothers‼️. His team wrote the hook and Chris Brown’s sung part‼️. Nicki wrote her verse; Drake and Wayne wrote theirs. Chris Brown was paid as a featured artist and, according to Ray, did not take a writer’s share the same way the others did‼️. They did the record with Dr. Luke. Luke’s rule in the room was simple: there are seven writers on this song, so we split the publishing seven ways‼️. Everybody walks with roughly 13–14 percent‼️. Because Ray had *two* writers on the record (Theron and Timothy), his side left with about 26–27 percent‼️. He contrasts that with what usually happens on the urban/hip-hop side. The producer often takes 50 percent off the top‼️. Then the big features come in with their standard deal: a flat fee *plus* a set publishing percentage (Ray has used examples like 17.5 percent) no matter how many other people are on the record‼️. After Nicki, Drake, Wayne, and Chris Brown’s teams all take their cuts, the original writers are left fighting over the scraps — sometimes 5–10 percent total‼️. Ray has said that if they had done “Only” with a typical urban producer instead of Luke, he probably would have walked with something closer to 5–10 percent after the fight‼️. That’s the point he keeps making: same song, same contribution, completely different math depending on whose room you’re in and whose rules you play by‼️. The pop-style equal split is why he still talks about owning a real piece of a Nicki/Drake/Wayne/Chris Brown record more than a decade later‼️💯.

(st_ides)

268,458 次观看 • 19 天前

38 Spesh disses Fat Joe, Jim Jones, Jadakiss and Stove God Cooks in a new freestyle. On July 24, Spesh took the stage at Hot 97's Summer Jam 2026 at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., and rapped an acapella freestyle that takes aim at Joe, Capo, Jada and Stove. "Yo, Jim I got a bone to pick/That's some h*e sh*t - talking bout how another ni**a clothes fit/When yo house on the foreclosed list," Spesh raps. "Before you made cash off rap what was yo job?/Jim story faker than the one Fat Joe robbed," Spesh continues. "Got a flow that'll fill stands/Only reason Kiss eating cause he Fat Joe's lil mans," Spesh adds, before saying he would hit Stove with a hook. A short time after his performance, Spesh released the AraabMUZIK-produced version of the rap called "Fools Mate" on DSPs. The new diss track is a culmination of months-long tension between 38 Spesh and Jada, after Spesh began calling out Jada for allegedly not wanting to get on a track with him since Spesh claimed he got the best of the LOX rapper on the 2019 song "Sunday School." Jim Jones interjected himself in the conversation by coming to Jada's defense. Spesh dissed the former Dip Set rapper in an interview, prompting a response from Jim and affiliate Chunk Bizza. On July 10, Fat Joe, Jadakiss and Stove God released the song "The Aroma," where Jada takes a shot at Spesh, rapping, "I been obliterating ni**as for years/Is this about a verse, or is this about a career?" On Monday (July 27), in the wake of his Summer Jam performance, Spesh dropped a music video for "Fools Mate," which features Fat Joe and Jadakiss look-alikes. 🎥: Billionairepolo/X

XXL Magazine

66,901 次观看 • 1 个月前

Officer gets his ego damaged because guy on a bike asked the employees of white castle directions after the office already told him. So the officer takes him down arrested him and cost the city 9.3 million in a settlement. ​20-year-old Luther Gonzalez-Hall was riding his bicycle home when he became lost. He flagged down Dearborn Police Officer Marvin Sanders to ask for help. Finding the officer’s demeanor hostile, Luther decided to ride over to a nearby White Castle to ask the employees inside for directions instead. ​Officer Sanders followed him into the restaurant, aggressively demanding to know why Luther was seeking a second opinion. As the officer began pulling on tactical gloves, Luther grew terrified and tried to walk away to de-escalate the situation. ​The moment Luther stepped outside, Officer Sanders pursued him, pulled him off his bicycle, took him down and placed him in a ch0ke hold to apprehend him. ​As a result of the encounter Luther now has a lifelong limp. (trying to keep X happy here) ​To justify his actions, Officer Sanders charged Luther with resisting and obstructing a police officer. However, an internal affairs investigation later found that Sanders had absolutely no legal basis to detain or arrest Luther in the first place, and his police report failed to provide a factual account of the incident. All criminal charges against Luther were completely dismissed. ​Despite the department's internal findings explicitly condemning the arrest, the city heavily protected Sanders during the ensuing litigation. Instead of facing criminal charges or being fired, public records and legal proceedings revealed that Sanders remained on the force—and was even PROMOTED to Detective while the civil lawsuit was playing out in federal court. ​Because the court stripped Officer Sanders of his qualified immunity for violating Luther's constitutional protections against unlawful seizure and excessive force, the case went before a jury. After watching this exact bodycam footage, the jury vindicated Luther Gonzalez-Hall and awarded him a $9.3 million verdict for the egregious civil rights violations and his permanent impairment. ​While municipal contracts typically ensure that taxpayers and city insurance absorb the financial brunt of these massive payouts rather than the officers themselves, verdicts like this prove that juries are growing increasingly exhausted by bully tactics and a lack of police de-escalation. Another bully officer costing tax payers millions. How do these folks keep their jobs and in this case get promoted?

Giggling Ganon

1,011,058 次观看 • 2 个月前

53 year old mechanic working on a car in a church parking lot gets arrested by two bully cops for not giving his ID immediately. In a church parking lot in Huntsville, Alabama. Roland Edger was doing exactly what he was paid to do: repair a broken-down vehicle for a regular customer. But a local security guard spotted them after hours and mistakenly phoned the police, reporting "suspicious males" messing with a car. ​When Huntsville Police Officer Krista McCabe arrived, Edger was entirely transparent, explaining precisely why he was there. But when McCabe demanded his physical ID, Edger questioned the order. Without warning, a second arriving officer, Cameron Perillat, grabbed Edger from behind and threw him into handcuffs. Even though Edger offered his physical ID multiple times while being detained, the officers proceeded to arrest him on charges of obstructing governmental operations. While taking him into custody the officer lied to Edgar's step son that was present saying she repeated asked him and he repeatedly refused to provide his ID. She then threatened Edgar with a resisting arrest charge even though he was already cuffed and complying. Edgar was taken to jail and booked on obstruction charges, however Edger didn't back down. Immediately after his charges were dismissed, he took the city and the officers to court. ​Initially, a lower court judge dismissed his civil rights lawsuit by granting the officers "qualified immunity." But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit stripped that immunity away in a unanimous, historic decision. ​The court made the law crystal clear: ​Under Alabama's stop-and-identify statute, police have the right to ask for your name, address, and an explanation of your actions if they have reasonable suspicion. ​Crucially, the law does not compel citizens to hand over a physical ID card or driver's license unless they are operating a motor vehicle. ​Because Edger was verbally explaining his actions and the officers never actually asked for his verbal name or address before arresting him, they had absolutely no legal cause to seize him. ​The case finally went before a federal jury, which delivered justice for Roland Edger by awarding him $77,000 in damages—including $75,000 for pain and suffering and $1,000 in personal punitive damages out of the pockets of each officer involved. ​The real crime is these tyrant officers didn't face public termination or criminal charges, the case forced the City of Huntsville to completely overhaul its training protocols regarding Fourth Amendment boundaries. ​Know your rights. A badge does not give law enforcement the power to rewrite the law on the spot.

Giggling Ganon

64,860 次观看 • 2 个月前

I’ve been reporting the threats I’ve been receiving from Pakistani and Bengali Muslims in Swansea, but the police have repeatedly refused to help me. And I can’t help but believe it’s because I’ve filed a complaint against an Imam from the local mosque, the same Imam responsible for my wrongful arrest. This man even showed up at my basketball match with eight thugs, trying to intimidate me. He demanded that I delete my Facebook, X, and YouTube accounts, and that I stop saying Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 is not a racist or that the white people who support him are not racists. When I refused to be bullied by this lunatic, he took my photo and name and circulated them across Muslim communities throughout the UK deliberately making me a target. People don’t realise how dangerous this is. It only takes one extremist to label me an “enemy of Islam” and end my life. Yet the police treat this like a joke. To make things even more worrying, the police officer handling my complaint started the conversation by bringing up “pro-Palestine” completely unprompted. That alone shows he came into the call with his own agenda long before he even listened to my concerns. And then, somehow, while I was making a complaint about being threatened, this incompetent officer found a way to blame me. All charges against me have already been dropped, yet he still acted like he knows better than the judges and the CPS. Was he biased? Or simply incapable? I honestly don’t know anymore. All I want to know is this, is what this police officer said on the call actually true? Because nothing about any of this feels like justice.

Sir Shoaib

119,122 次观看 • 10 个月前