Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

LINDSAY CLANCY: Criminal-defense attorney Ashleigh Merchant explains how questions involving Catholicism and mortal sin, along with new reports about the holdout juror’s faith, could factor into Clancy’s double-jeopardy challenge and an argument that prosecutors “goaded” the defense toward seeking a mistrial. This is all really interesting. When did it... show more

Lauren Conlin

43,498 subscribers

34,578 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Sanat Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

18 Yorum

Gemma profil fotoğrafı

Gemma4 gün önce

Ashleigh has been pro Lindsay and it’s gross

Lauren Conlin profil fotoğrafı

Lauren Conlin4 gün önce

Read more about our interview:

Critical Mass profil fotoğrafı

Critical Mass4 gün önce

New reports abt the hold-out’s faith?! Are you serious? Why don’t you mention the TRIPE coming out the mouths of the ignorant females who did not follow the jury instructions or the law? They had a cause, you see. Don’t read this LAMag crap. That motion is a LOSAH.

Old School Dude profil fotoğrafı

Old School Dude4 gün önce

Oh look, 2 white women who believe the black man should be l^nched for not obeying the 12 women jurors.

Jamie profil fotoğrafı

Jamie5 gün önce

It would be a sin for Lindsay Clancy’s case to be dismissed 🥺

João Sousa profil fotoğrafı

João Sousa4 gün önce

Look at them smile while they talk about a triple child murderer walking free. They are so happy.

michelle L profil fotoğrafı

michelle L5 gün önce

Just like @markgeragos said

Maegan profil fotoğrafı

Maegan5 gün önce

Great convo, loved listening to you both!

Lauren Conlin profil fotoğrafı

Lauren Conlin5 gün önce

Thank you!

CarrieLaffs profil fotoğrafı

CarrieLaffs5 gün önce

You're allowed to use your own personal experiences when deciding on a jury 🙄

Beth profil fotoğrafı

Beth5 gün önce

The definition of reasonable doubt includes “moral certainty”. And the defense called Chaplain Cavanaugh to the stand so bringing up religious beliefs is not far fetched.

Mandy.𝕏 profil fotoğrafı

Mandy.𝕏4 gün önce

I really don’t think they will re try it

QB 📸🎙️ profil fotoğrafı

QB 📸🎙️4 gün önce

Double jeopardy is not a thing in MA. This is a joke.

Sallis profil fotoğrafı

Sallis4 gün önce

Very interesting. Thanks for the vid.

Goddess First profil fotoğrafı

Goddess First4 gün önce

What, now jurors will be scanned for religious beliefs? That is due process violation. Move on from this nonsense

HERMIT-SAL profil fotoğrafı

HERMIT-SAL5 gün önce

Always a great posting, Lauren ! ❤️

U.S. STEEL 💪💪💪 profil fotoğrafı

U.S. STEEL 💪💪💪4 gün önce

Horrible take. IMO

BO Jiden profil fotoğrafı

BO Jiden4 gün önce

Reddington has more worry about than trial. Like disbarment or prison

Benzer Videolar

BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney is asking a judge to question the lone holdout juror after her murder trial ended in a mistrial. Bryan Llenas reports the defense wants to examine whether Michael P. Desronvil was truthful on his juror questionnaire and whether he used his cellphone or received outside information during deliberations. The attorney is also seeking the jurors’ confidential questionnaires and cellphone records from the days of deliberations. The defense is asking the judge to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds and rule that Clancy was not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. Download the FOX News app to follow this developing story:

BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney is asking a judge to question the lone holdout juror after her murder trial ended in a mistrial. Bryan Llenas reports the defense wants to examine whether Michael P. Desronvil was truthful on his juror questionnaire and whether he used his cellphone or received outside information during deliberations. The attorney is also seeking the jurors’ confidential questionnaires and cellphone records from the days of deliberations. The defense is asking the judge to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds and rule that Clancy was not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. Download the FOX News app to follow this developing story:

Fox News

229,426 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley says that multiple jurors might've SWITCHED toward reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy, but ONE DID NOT "If THIS juror remains unchanged...we WILL HAVE A MISTRIAL." The defense is currently furious. One juror could let the case go all over again with a NEW JURY "There was tension...it's possible some jurors switched, but that one holdout remains."

🚨 JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley says that multiple jurors might've SWITCHED toward reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy, but ONE DID NOT "If THIS juror remains unchanged...we WILL HAVE A MISTRIAL." The defense is currently furious. One juror could let the case go all over again with a NEW JURY "There was tension...it's possible some jurors switched, but that one holdout remains."

Eric Daugherty

918,387 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

"This is really sort of entering that realm of creepy." Constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley questions Clancy defense attorney Kevin Reddington over his challenge to the lone juror holdout and push for a retrial. Turley warns the fight sends a troubling message to anyone serving on a jury in a high-profile case: "They're going to just twist in the wind when they don't go with or they're the lone holdout with one side." America Reports

Fox News

195,983 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

📌Lindsay Clancy THIS is worth listening to. Mark Geragos a longtime criminal defense attorney and Matt Murphy, a former prosecutor, explain why they believe Lindsay Clancy’s DEFENSE is winning this trial. Two lawyers who spent their careers on opposite sides of the courtroom are looking at the evidence and reaching the same conclusion. For weeks we’ve heard about the medications, intrusive thoughts, suicidal ideation, psychiatric treatment, attempts to get help and the cracks in the care Lindsay received. The Commonwealth can prove something horrific happened, however Lindsay stipulates she did it. But now proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt is an entirely different question. And THAT is what this trial is about

📌Lindsay Clancy THIS is worth listening to. Mark Geragos a longtime criminal defense attorney and Matt Murphy, a former prosecutor, explain why they believe Lindsay Clancy’s DEFENSE is winning this trial. Two lawyers who spent their careers on opposite sides of the courtroom are looking at the evidence and reaching the same conclusion. For weeks we’ve heard about the medications, intrusive thoughts, suicidal ideation, psychiatric treatment, attempts to get help and the cracks in the care Lindsay received. The Commonwealth can prove something horrific happened, however Lindsay stipulates she did it. But now proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt is an entirely different question. And THAT is what this trial is about

Kelly💚🌴

14,118 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Lindsay Clancy update…this is defense attorney Kevin Reddington’s argument as to Patrick Clancy’s request to the Court to limit public access to the various photographs of the children that the CW seeks to introduce. I’m in lock step with him and can’t wait to watch him try this case. He pulls zero punches and I’m here for all of it. Kevin Reddington Judge Sullivan has granted Patrick Clancy’s motion.

Lindsay Clancy update…this is defense attorney Kevin Reddington’s argument as to Patrick Clancy’s request to the Court to limit public access to the various photographs of the children that the CW seeks to introduce. I’m in lock step with him and can’t wait to watch him try this case. He pulls zero punches and I’m here for all of it. Kevin Reddington Judge Sullivan has granted Patrick Clancy’s motion.

Defense Diaries

20,665 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

What’s going to happen next with the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial? Mark O’Mara, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, says he’s never seen this before: “There's no question, though it is my supposition, that that note said we are 11 to 1 for acquittal. And we can't get there because of this one juror.”

What’s going to happen next with the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial? Mark O’Mara, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, says he’s never seen this before: “There's no question, though it is my supposition, that that note said we are 11 to 1 for acquittal. And we can't get there because of this one juror.”

Erin Burnett OutFront

10,702 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

The mistrial fight just got even uglier. Defense wants the judge to poll the jury on first-degree, second-degree, and manslaughter separately. Why? If they were unanimous that it wasn’t first-degree, Reddington will try to slap double jeopardy on that charge so prosecutors can’t bring it again on retry. Then he called the holdout a “travesty,” floated an Americans with Disabilities Act claim, and begged for an hour to race an emergency stay to a single justice so the mistrial doesn’t land. Translation: one juror wouldn’t give them the walk they wanted, so now they’re trying to freeze the mistrial and kneecap the murder charges before the next trial even starts. Three dead kids. Games in the courthouse. This is what a hung jury looks like when the defense smells an escape hatch.

The mistrial fight just got even uglier. Defense wants the judge to poll the jury on first-degree, second-degree, and manslaughter separately. Why? If they were unanimous that it wasn’t first-degree, Reddington will try to slap double jeopardy on that charge so prosecutors can’t bring it again on retry. Then he called the holdout a “travesty,” floated an Americans with Disabilities Act claim, and begged for an hour to race an emergency stay to a single justice so the mistrial doesn’t land. Translation: one juror wouldn’t give them the walk they wanted, so now they’re trying to freeze the mistrial and kneecap the murder charges before the next trial even starts. Three dead kids. Games in the courthouse. This is what a hung jury looks like when the defense smells an escape hatch.

Gunther Eagleman™

315,568 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan said he intends to declare a mistrial, but no mistrial has officially been declared because the jury has not been brought into the courtroom or dismissed. Before that could happen, defense attorney Kevin Reddington requested time to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, seeking a stay so he can argue the holdout juror should be replaced before a mistrial is declared. Donna Rotunno called the move unprecedented, saying an appeal could pause the case and leave the jury waiting while the higher court decides how to proceed.

BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan said he intends to declare a mistrial, but no mistrial has officially been declared because the jury has not been brought into the courtroom or dismissed. Before that could happen, defense attorney Kevin Reddington requested time to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, seeking a stay so he can argue the holdout juror should be replaced before a mistrial is declared. Donna Rotunno called the move unprecedented, saying an appeal could pause the case and leave the jury waiting while the higher court decides how to proceed.

Fox News

263,411 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Will Cain reports as Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington asks the court to investigate the lone holdout juror whose vote led to a mistrial in her triple-murder case. Reddington is seeking the juror's questionnaire, phone records from deliberation days, courthouse surveillance video and other records, while asking the judge to conduct a "limited inquiry" into the juror's conduct and answers during jury selection. The jury deadlocked 11-1, with the holdout favoring conviction while the other 11 supported finding Clancy not criminally responsible due to mental illness or defect. The Will Cain Show More on the case:

Will Cain reports as Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington asks the court to investigate the lone holdout juror whose vote led to a mistrial in her triple-murder case. Reddington is seeking the juror's questionnaire, phone records from deliberation days, courthouse surveillance video and other records, while asking the judge to conduct a "limited inquiry" into the juror's conduct and answers during jury selection. The jury deadlocked 11-1, with the holdout favoring conviction while the other 11 supported finding Clancy not criminally responsible due to mental illness or defect. The Will Cain Show More on the case:

Fox News

156,580 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

🚨 LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL UPDATE Defense is in full swing on the insanity claim. Her attorney says they’ll finish with doctors today and may rest the case tomorrow. They’re also bringing in a former McLean Hospital employee who posted a viral TikTok slamming the facility for being understaffed when Clancy checked herself in. Prosecutors spent weeks laying out the killings. The defense only has to raise reasonable doubt about her mental state. Jury will decide if she knew what she was doing when she murdered her own children.

🚨 LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL UPDATE Defense is in full swing on the insanity claim. Her attorney says they’ll finish with doctors today and may rest the case tomorrow. They’re also bringing in a former McLean Hospital employee who posted a viral TikTok slamming the facility for being understaffed when Clancy checked herself in. Prosecutors spent weeks laying out the killings. The defense only has to raise reasonable doubt about her mental state. Jury will decide if she knew what she was doing when she murdered her own children.

Gunther Eagleman™

519,875 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney is MELTING DOWN in court and DIRECTLY SPARRING with the judge, calling the judge "SOFT" DEFENSE: Stop being soft with jury instructions! JUDGE: What do you want me to do?! Get a BRASS BAND?! I read the instruction as written by the Massachusetts Supreme Court?! The fact I perhaps did not give it my full inflection, I'm sorry about that, I'm not an actor! I'm giving INSTRUCTION!

🚨 BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney is MELTING DOWN in court and DIRECTLY SPARRING with the judge, calling the judge "SOFT" DEFENSE: Stop being soft with jury instructions! JUDGE: What do you want me to do?! Get a BRASS BAND?! I read the instruction as written by the Massachusetts Supreme Court?! The fact I perhaps did not give it my full inflection, I'm sorry about that, I'm not an actor! I'm giving INSTRUCTION!

Nick Sortor

1,588,014 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

🚨 NOW: The judge just got frustrated with the Lindsay Clancy defense attorney trying to appeal the mistrial and keep the exhausted jurors going UNBELIEVABLE! DEFENSE: I want to appeal JUDGE: How much TIME do you need to do that? DEFENSE: Filed today, argue tomorrow JUDGE: Saturday?! So what, are we gonna tell this jury to come back tomorrow?! As they're WALKING IN you're asking for this. I'm trying to figure out what you're asking for...I'll give you ONE HOUR to petition for a stay before we bring the jury back down.

🚨 NOW: The judge just got frustrated with the Lindsay Clancy defense attorney trying to appeal the mistrial and keep the exhausted jurors going UNBELIEVABLE! DEFENSE: I want to appeal JUDGE: How much TIME do you need to do that? DEFENSE: Filed today, argue tomorrow JUDGE: Saturday?! So what, are we gonna tell this jury to come back tomorrow?! As they're WALKING IN you're asking for this. I'm trying to figure out what you're asking for...I'll give you ONE HOUR to petition for a stay before we bring the jury back down.

Eric Daugherty

318,317 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions HOLD THE LINE!! The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her "There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"

🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions HOLD THE LINE!! The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her "There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"

Eric Daugherty

4,187,210 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

“Here is what this case is NOT about: YOU.” Ben Shapiro explains that the focus of Lindsay Clancy’s defense is very narrow. It’s not postpartum depression. It’s postpartum PSYCHOSIS. He warns people against reading their own PPD into the case or making uneducated judgments about PPD based on it. Ben breaks down the psychiatric and legal implications with nuance, compassion, and realism. 🎥: Full episode in comments!

“Here is what this case is NOT about: YOU.” Ben Shapiro explains that the focus of Lindsay Clancy’s defense is very narrow. It’s not postpartum depression. It’s postpartum PSYCHOSIS. He warns people against reading their own PPD into the case or making uneducated judgments about PPD based on it. Ben breaks down the psychiatric and legal implications with nuance, compassion, and realism. 🎥: Full episode in comments!

Jackie Chea ⚖️| Agent #13/92

58,912 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 JUST NOW: Utah prosecutors HIT BACK at Tyler Robinson's attorney for calling Charlie Kirk "HATEFUL," declaring the defense just SCREWED themselves "[Charlie] had an opinion that he would express on politics and religion. That DOES NOT make it 'HATE.' But the fact that [the defense] even CONSIDERED it as 'hate' MAKES THE CASE for the state," prosecutors said "The state takes GREAT exception with Mr. Novak attributing all of this 'HATE' to Mr. Kirk during his argument today." The defense just opened up a BIG can of worms, seemingly trying to argue kiIIing "hateful" people for their speech is NOT political assassination. Good luck with that!

🚨 JUST NOW: Utah prosecutors HIT BACK at Tyler Robinson's attorney for calling Charlie Kirk "HATEFUL," declaring the defense just SCREWED themselves "[Charlie] had an opinion that he would express on politics and religion. That DOES NOT make it 'HATE.' But the fact that [the defense] even CONSIDERED it as 'hate' MAKES THE CASE for the state," prosecutors said "The state takes GREAT exception with Mr. Novak attributing all of this 'HATE' to Mr. Kirk during his argument today." The defense just opened up a BIG can of worms, seemingly trying to argue kiIIing "hateful" people for their speech is NOT political assassination. Good luck with that!

Nick Sortor

482,691 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Jonathan Turley just called Kevin Reddington’s appeal what it is: unbelievable… and barely intelligible. The defense filed a seven-page petition to Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court claiming one juror “acknowledged doubt” but is “refusing to apply it as the law states,” so kick him or grill him harder. Turley’s read: disagreeing with the other eleven is NOT grounds to swap in an alternate. The judge already asked if they could follow the law. The only “evidence” is that this juror won’t cave. And the court already decided there’s a mistrial. Reddington’s trying to fire the one man who wouldn’t let Lindsay Clancy walk… after the mistrial bell already rang. That’s not following the law. That’s hunting the holdout.

Jonathan Turley just called Kevin Reddington’s appeal what it is: unbelievable… and barely intelligible. The defense filed a seven-page petition to Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court claiming one juror “acknowledged doubt” but is “refusing to apply it as the law states,” so kick him or grill him harder. Turley’s read: disagreeing with the other eleven is NOT grounds to swap in an alternate. The judge already asked if they could follow the law. The only “evidence” is that this juror won’t cave. And the court already decided there’s a mistrial. Reddington’s trying to fire the one man who wouldn’t let Lindsay Clancy walk… after the mistrial bell already rang. That’s not following the law. That’s hunting the holdout.

Gunther Eagleman™

71,170 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

What the heck is going on with liberal women in the USA? Corie Walsh of Frankfort, Illinois, got so deep into the Lindsay Clancy case that prosecutors say she was still texting friends about the trial hours before her 2-year-old son Barrett was found dead. She’s charged with three counts of first-degree murder. Court filings say she told police she did it because he was “the devil” and “the anti-Christ.” Clancy’s Massachusetts trial just ended in a mistrial. Walsh had been living inside that livestream. And the comments I’m seeing from Clancy supporters online are pure evil. A toddler is dead, and somehow the online choir still wants to rewrite the crime.

What the heck is going on with liberal women in the USA? Corie Walsh of Frankfort, Illinois, got so deep into the Lindsay Clancy case that prosecutors say she was still texting friends about the trial hours before her 2-year-old son Barrett was found dead. She’s charged with three counts of first-degree murder. Court filings say she told police she did it because he was “the devil” and “the anti-Christ.” Clancy’s Massachusetts trial just ended in a mistrial. Walsh had been living inside that livestream. And the comments I’m seeing from Clancy supporters online are pure evil. A toddler is dead, and somehow the online choir still wants to rewrite the crime.

Kim "Katie" USA

16,358 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

VERDICT WATCH DAY 3: PRESS SCRUM Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington stepped out to grab coffee and answered questions from a waiting press pool. Earlier in the day, Reddington made it clear he was angry about some television commentators discussing his client and the case over the weekend. I asked him about that criticism, as well as who is here supporting Lindsay Clancy as the jury continues deliberating. Then, in the middle of our questions, two women who said they drove all the way from Houston, Texas, approached Reddington to thank him for his defense of Clancy. They shared their own families’ experiences with postpartum depression and told him they wished they had someone like him advocating for them during that difficult time. WATCH the full courthouse scrum and hear what Kevin Reddington — and the women who traveled from Texas — had to say. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #VerdictWatch #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #CourtTV #PlymouthMassachusetts #PostpartumDepression

VERDICT WATCH DAY 3: PRESS SCRUM Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington stepped out to grab coffee and answered questions from a waiting press pool. Earlier in the day, Reddington made it clear he was angry about some television commentators discussing his client and the case over the weekend. I asked him about that criticism, as well as who is here supporting Lindsay Clancy as the jury continues deliberating. Then, in the middle of our questions, two women who said they drove all the way from Houston, Texas, approached Reddington to thank him for his defense of Clancy. They shared their own families’ experiences with postpartum depression and told him they wished they had someone like him advocating for them during that difficult time. WATCH the full courthouse scrum and hear what Kevin Reddington — and the women who traveled from Texas — had to say. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #VerdictWatch #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #CourtTV #PlymouthMassachusetts #PostpartumDepression

Laura Ingle

25,645 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Retired Massachusetts judge tells me; Keep your eyes on a possible next step in the Lindsay Clancy case: a “Fidler hearing.” After a mistrial in the triple murder case, Clancy’s defense is again asking the judge to find her not guilty as jurors reveal what happened behind closed doors. “If a juror truly had reasonable doubt about criminal responsibility, the law required a not-guilty verdict,” retired Massachusetts Judge James Barretto explains. But the holdout “could have misunderstood—or worse, even misapplied—the law.” Barretto says credible evidence of juror misconduct, bias or dishonesty during jury selection could trigger a Fidler hearing—an evidentiary hearing examining what happened and whether it affected the trial. Listen to Barretto explain the legal roadblock—and what could trigger a rare Fidler hearing—on my show NewsNation Live.

Retired Massachusetts judge tells me; Keep your eyes on a possible next step in the Lindsay Clancy case: a “Fidler hearing.” After a mistrial in the triple murder case, Clancy’s defense is again asking the judge to find her not guilty as jurors reveal what happened behind closed doors. “If a juror truly had reasonable doubt about criminal responsibility, the law required a not-guilty verdict,” retired Massachusetts Judge James Barretto explains. But the holdout “could have misunderstood—or worse, even misapplied—the law.” Barretto says credible evidence of juror misconduct, bias or dishonesty during jury selection could trigger a Fidler hearing—an evidentiary hearing examining what happened and whether it affected the trial. Listen to Barretto explain the legal roadblock—and what could trigger a rare Fidler hearing—on my show NewsNation Live.

Laura Ingle

97,782 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Stephen A. Smith reveals he believes White women in the United States of America are generally afforded more humanity than Black women, as Judge Eboni K. Williams highlights the similarities between the cases of Lindsay Clancy and Latarsha Sanders in the state of Massachusetts. Judge Eboni K. Williams points out that the same judge who presided over Lindsay Clancy’s trial also presided over the 2022 trial of Latarsha Sanders, a Black woman who was found guilty of m*rdering her two sons. Latarsha Sanders’ convictions were recently overturned after Massachusetts’ highest court ruled that Judge William F. Sullivan wrongly excluded psychiatric records relevant to her mental-health defense, while mental-health and psychiatric evidence was allowed to be presented during Lindsay Clancy’s trial, when Lindsay Clancy similarly k*lled her own three children. Also, Sumatra Abernathy points out the hypocrisy of some of the same people who voted to protect unborn children by voting against abortion but are now angry with the lone Black holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case whose vote resulted in a mistrial, while saying Lindsay Clancy should be found not criminally responsible because of her mental state after she k*lled her three children, while Attorney Ashley Christopher makes an argument about how the same standard is not being applied to Black women. (🎥The Culture Table/Straight Shooter Media/Youtube)

Stephen A. Smith reveals he believes White women in the United States of America are generally afforded more humanity than Black women, as Judge Eboni K. Williams highlights the similarities between the cases of Lindsay Clancy and Latarsha Sanders in the state of Massachusetts. Judge Eboni K. Williams points out that the same judge who presided over Lindsay Clancy’s trial also presided over the 2022 trial of Latarsha Sanders, a Black woman who was found guilty of mrdering her two sons. Latarsha Sanders’ convictions were recently overturned after Massachusetts’ highest court ruled that Judge William F. Sullivan wrongly excluded psychiatric records relevant to her mental-health defense, while mental-health and psychiatric evidence was allowed to be presented during Lindsay Clancy’s trial, when Lindsay Clancy similarly klled her own three children. Also, Sumatra Abernathy points out the hypocrisy of some of the same people who voted to protect unborn children by voting against abortion but are now angry with the lone Black holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case whose vote resulted in a mistrial, while saying Lindsay Clancy should be found not criminally responsible because of her mental state after she k*lled her three children, while Attorney Ashley Christopher makes an argument about how the same standard is not being applied to Black women. (🎥The Culture Table/Straight Shooter Media/Youtube)

The Art Of Dialogue

144,529 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce