Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Listen carefully to the script that gets recycled every time. Muslims are always framed as the “besieged community.” Society is always “at breaking point.” Any naming of jihadist terror is always recast as a threat to a “way of life.” Notice what never changes: • Attacks on Hindus are...

ZZoariah's profile picture

Zeba Zoariah

16,836 subscribers

15,121 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A woman at the CJP protest is saying that Muslims are very good people. She says that it is Muslims who are feeding everyone at the CJP protest, and that Muslims are always the first to come forward and support others everywhere. At the same time, she is criticizing Hindus, saying that Hindus promote casteism and that Hindus cannot give respect to others. The real agenda of the CJP protest is slowly becoming clear. This is not a students' protest. This protest is using students' name as a cover to defame Hindus while portraying Muslims in a positive light.
0:33

A woman at the CJP protest is saying that Muslims are very good people. She says that it is Muslims who are feeding everyone at the CJP protest, and that Muslims are always the first to come forward and support others everywhere. At the same time, she is criticizing Hindus, saying that Hindus promote casteism and that Hindus cannot give respect to others. The real agenda of the CJP protest is slowly becoming clear. This is not a students' protest. This protest is using students' name as a cover to defame Hindus while portraying Muslims in a positive light.

Saffron Chargers

49,461 views • 1 month ago

Today, war has become an unfortunate necessity for us in response to a certain situation. However, as a Nation and as a People we must always keep this quality about us that we are not ruled by hatred and we never take pleasure in violence towards anyone for any reason. At the same time, we have a duty and a Responsibility toward our own people to address certain situations and that is what the Nation is doing. This is not a war of hate but one of necessity. Let it remain so. -Sg
2:22

Today, war has become an unfortunate necessity for us in response to a certain situation. However, as a Nation and as a People we must always keep this quality about us that we are not ruled by hatred and we never take pleasure in violence towards anyone for any reason. At the same time, we have a duty and a Responsibility toward our own people to address certain situations and that is what the Nation is doing. This is not a war of hate but one of necessity. Let it remain so. -Sg

Sadhguru

76,262 views • 1 year ago

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: And as no immediate threat was assessed here in this case, shooting down the MiGs was not necessary. And of course, what we will always do is to make sure that we react in a proportionate way. But this is how it works. So it doesn't mean that we will always immediately shoot down a plane. We will, as I said, based on clear dimensions, assess the situation in real time, based on all the available intelligence. And that's exactly what happened here.
0:35

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: And as no immediate threat was assessed here in this case, shooting down the MiGs was not necessary. And of course, what we will always do is to make sure that we react in a proportionate way. But this is how it works. So it doesn't mean that we will always immediately shoot down a plane. We will, as I said, based on clear dimensions, assess the situation in real time, based on all the available intelligence. And that's exactly what happened here.

Anton Gerashchenko

141,906 views • 10 months ago

Subversion works best when you don’t notice it. Media is a key delivery system because it can slowly retrain a public’s instincts, until people treat the subverter’s values as “good” and “normal,” and start doubting their own. Demoralization comes first because it weakens judgment while still feeling like everyday life. Media doesn’t just report. It trains interpretation: what counts as scandal, what counts as nothing, and which questions are respectable. It can bury a story by starving it of attention, or “cover” it with contempt so curiosity feels embarrassing. That’s why selective coverage isn’t a minor flaw. It’s the mechanism. The issue isn’t only that facts go missing. It’s that the audience is trained in advance on what deserves notice and what deserves ridicule. Over time, people stop processing information to understand and start processing it to belong. So when you see major outlets treat allegations against the left as unworthy of attention and treat curiosity as the offense, focus on the pattern, not the single story. Ask who gets investigation, and who gets “nothing to see here.” That’s the tell. Once a public learns to self-censor its own curiosity, the job is mostly done.
1:52

Subversion works best when you don’t notice it. Media is a key delivery system because it can slowly retrain a public’s instincts, until people treat the subverter’s values as “good” and “normal,” and start doubting their own. Demoralization comes first because it weakens judgment while still feeling like everyday life. Media doesn’t just report. It trains interpretation: what counts as scandal, what counts as nothing, and which questions are respectable. It can bury a story by starving it of attention, or “cover” it with contempt so curiosity feels embarrassing. That’s why selective coverage isn’t a minor flaw. It’s the mechanism. The issue isn’t only that facts go missing. It’s that the audience is trained in advance on what deserves notice and what deserves ridicule. Over time, people stop processing information to understand and start processing it to belong. So when you see major outlets treat allegations against the left as unworthy of attention and treat curiosity as the offense, focus on the pattern, not the single story. Ask who gets investigation, and who gets “nothing to see here.” That’s the tell. Once a public learns to self-censor its own curiosity, the job is mostly done.

Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost

154,720 views • 7 months ago

Jeff Clark drafted a legal memo for President Trump, never sent it, never acted on it. This is exactly what lawyers are supposed to do. Now the D.C. Bar wants to disbar him, not for misconduct, but for thinking the wrong way. This isn’t about ethics or law. It’s about punishing dissent. If leftists can destroy a lawyer for writing a draft, they can destroy anyone. This is how professional institutions become political weapons. And if it stands, the rule of law doesn’t.
13:27

Jeff Clark drafted a legal memo for President Trump, never sent it, never acted on it. This is exactly what lawyers are supposed to do. Now the D.C. Bar wants to disbar him, not for misconduct, but for thinking the wrong way. This isn’t about ethics or law. It’s about punishing dissent. If leftists can destroy a lawyer for writing a draft, they can destroy anyone. This is how professional institutions become political weapons. And if it stands, the rule of law doesn’t.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

123,036 views • 10 months ago

.Piers Morgan on violent Cincinnati attack: "What has happened to our society...when the first thought of people when they see a woman knocked unconscious, who may be dead, is to take a phone out and record it on their phone and then post it on social media for likes? That is as sickening as any other part of this."
0:34

.Piers Morgan on violent Cincinnati attack: "What has happened to our society...when the first thought of people when they see a woman knocked unconscious, who may be dead, is to take a phone out and record it on their phone and then post it on social media for likes? That is as sickening as any other part of this."

Fox News

188,999 views • 1 year ago

🚨Start with this truth… When any law-enforcement agency moves to secure election materials, the reaction tells you more than the action itself. If ballots are clean, documented, and lawfully processed, seizure or review is procedural… boring… uneventful. Chain of custody gets logged. Counts get verified. Everyone moves on. That is not what you’re seeing. What you’re seeing is panic language. Urgency. Outrage. Demands to stop scrutiny before it even happens. That reaction alone raises the question every American should ask… Why is transparency being treated like a threat? Now widen the lens. Democrat power structures do not rely solely on policy. They rely on containment. And one of their most effective tools is the use of trusted local intermediaries… political gatekeepers who speak the language of the community while enforcing the interests of the party. When questions arise about elections, those gatekeepers are deployed immediately to shut it down, shame dissent, and label curiosity as betrayal. Not investigation… but obedience. Not verification… but silence. That’s the pattern. The moment scrutiny appears, the message shifts from “every vote counts” to “do not look.” From “trust the process” to “how dare you question it.” From empowerment to intimidation. Ask your audience this… If everything is legitimate, why mobilize resistance instead of welcoming review? Why frame lawful scrutiny as an attack? Why enlist community enforcers instead of releasing records? Because systems built on narrative cannot survive sunlight. This is not about one county. This is not about one election. This is about whether Americans are allowed to verify outcomes or only accept them. And history is clear on this point… The people who fear audits are never the people who followed the rules. Let the evidence speak. Let the ballots be examined. Let the truth land where it lands. If the system is clean, it will be proven. If it isn’t, the country deserves to know. That’s not extremism. That’s citizenship. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
3:43

🚨Start with this truth… When any law-enforcement agency moves to secure election materials, the reaction tells you more than the action itself. If ballots are clean, documented, and lawfully processed, seizure or review is procedural… boring… uneventful. Chain of custody gets logged. Counts get verified. Everyone moves on. That is not what you’re seeing. What you’re seeing is panic language. Urgency. Outrage. Demands to stop scrutiny before it even happens. That reaction alone raises the question every American should ask… Why is transparency being treated like a threat? Now widen the lens. Democrat power structures do not rely solely on policy. They rely on containment. And one of their most effective tools is the use of trusted local intermediaries… political gatekeepers who speak the language of the community while enforcing the interests of the party. When questions arise about elections, those gatekeepers are deployed immediately to shut it down, shame dissent, and label curiosity as betrayal. Not investigation… but obedience. Not verification… but silence. That’s the pattern. The moment scrutiny appears, the message shifts from “every vote counts” to “do not look.” From “trust the process” to “how dare you question it.” From empowerment to intimidation. Ask your audience this… If everything is legitimate, why mobilize resistance instead of welcoming review? Why frame lawful scrutiny as an attack? Why enlist community enforcers instead of releasing records? Because systems built on narrative cannot survive sunlight. This is not about one county. This is not about one election. This is about whether Americans are allowed to verify outcomes or only accept them. And history is clear on this point… The people who fear audits are never the people who followed the rules. Let the evidence speak. Let the ballots be examined. Let the truth land where it lands. If the system is clean, it will be proven. If it isn’t, the country deserves to know. That’s not extremism. That’s citizenship. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

11,360 views • 6 months ago

80 years since the liberation of Auschwitz is a long stretch of time. A lot has changed. But what won’t change is our memory – how that war started, who was guilty, and who did the killing. And we will never forgive. We also remember that thanks to unity and determination, life won in the end. This is how it should always be. Thank you to everyone who keeps and shares the truth about that horrific time. Eternal memory to all the victims of the Holocaust! And thank you everyone who defends life today. It’s time for Europe to become a place without war. We dream about it. And we’re working for it.
2:56

80 years since the liberation of Auschwitz is a long stretch of time. A lot has changed. But what won’t change is our memory – how that war started, who was guilty, and who did the killing. And we will never forgive. We also remember that thanks to unity and determination, life won in the end. This is how it should always be. Thank you to everyone who keeps and shares the truth about that horrific time. Eternal memory to all the victims of the Holocaust! And thank you everyone who defends life today. It’s time for Europe to become a place without war. We dream about it. And we’re working for it.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

302,228 views • 1 year ago

DMK dimwits often dwell on matters that are beyond their level of comprehension. Hinduism or Sanathana Dharma is a way of life! Religion, by its very nature, will have doctrines. Sanatana Dharma doesn’t have doctrines. It’s free. It flows like water. It doesn’t tell how to pray to God and when to pray to God. When some organised sects called themselves a religion, Sanatana Dharma had to also call itself a religion. This is the crux of Swami Vivekananda’s speech in Chicago in 1893. When there is only Ramasamy in the world, it’s easy. When there are two Ramasamies, then the initial is needed to differentiate. Sanatana Dharma predates the concept of any religion. Dharma is eternal as it doesn’t have an origin or an end. There is no hierarchy here, and all are equal. This Dharma sees everyone as a God. That’s why it’s timeless & doesn’t see any religion as a threat, and accommodates all different beliefs within it.
1:48

DMK dimwits often dwell on matters that are beyond their level of comprehension. Hinduism or Sanathana Dharma is a way of life! Religion, by its very nature, will have doctrines. Sanatana Dharma doesn’t have doctrines. It’s free. It flows like water. It doesn’t tell how to pray to God and when to pray to God. When some organised sects called themselves a religion, Sanatana Dharma had to also call itself a religion. This is the crux of Swami Vivekananda’s speech in Chicago in 1893. When there is only Ramasamy in the world, it’s easy. When there are two Ramasamies, then the initial is needed to differentiate. Sanatana Dharma predates the concept of any religion. Dharma is eternal as it doesn’t have an origin or an end. There is no hierarchy here, and all are equal. This Dharma sees everyone as a God. That’s why it’s timeless & doesn’t see any religion as a threat, and accommodates all different beliefs within it.

K.Annamalai

380,013 views • 2 years ago

“As a Muslim, you have to hate non-Muslims for the sake of Allah! No matter what good deeds they do for you, it doesn’t matter; you have to hate them! It’s the truth!” Moderate Muslims may try to gaslight you by claiming that the Muslims in this video aren’t telling the truth, but that’s a lie. Why is it that the voices of these so-called ‘misguided few’ Muslims are always louder than the silence of the moderates?
1:46

“As a Muslim, you have to hate non-Muslims for the sake of Allah! No matter what good deeds they do for you, it doesn’t matter; you have to hate them! It’s the truth!” Moderate Muslims may try to gaslight you by claiming that the Muslims in this video aren’t telling the truth, but that’s a lie. Why is it that the voices of these so-called ‘misguided few’ Muslims are always louder than the silence of the moderates?

Yẹmí

31,951 views • 6 months ago

Concerning, but not surprising: Trump literally asks during a press conference if the executive order he just signed includes something about regulations—and is told, on the spot, that yes, it does. That’s not leadership. That’s a rubber stamp presidency, where he’s learning what he signed at the same time we are. This isn’t just sloppy—it’s dangerous. Executive orders carry the weight of law. If he doesn’t know what he’s signing, who is running the country?
0:33

Concerning, but not surprising: Trump literally asks during a press conference if the executive order he just signed includes something about regulations—and is told, on the spot, that yes, it does. That’s not leadership. That’s a rubber stamp presidency, where he’s learning what he signed at the same time we are. This isn’t just sloppy—it’s dangerous. Executive orders carry the weight of law. If he doesn’t know what he’s signing, who is running the country?

P a u l ◉

975,286 views • 1 year ago

Whenever I feel there might be a conflict, or if the neighbor likes to be difficult I will always get a survey first before even saying anything. Once that’s in hand I will then let them know I am planning a fence or doing something else. I feel that way they can’t argue with the facts but sometimes they like to anyways. This woman knows the fence isn’t on her property and even avoids it by a few feet. Yet she starts removing the fence as it’s being built, would you stand for this? How do you stop someone who won’t respect the lines? I think the best way is to document everything with paperwork and video. Install a camera so there is proof they are doing what they are doing. I always try to cover my end that’s why I always have cameras everywhere. I never know when I might need it. If I end up in court then it’s no longer here say with evidence. I try to avoid confrontation as much as I can but sometimes it’s unavoidable. I’ve always lived life the way I see fit and I try to always do the right thing. I refuse to let others dictate how I do things especially if my way is proven to be effective. Dealing with stubborn neighbors can be drab but eventually it will work out, it’s the time in between that’s frustrating. The last time I did the fence. The neighbor at first tried to didn’t like the idea she would have a fence on one side of her driveway in case she opened the door and hit it. I explained to her that sometimes there may be kids playing and that I didn’t want a stray toy or ball to hit her house or car. At the end of the day she was reasonable and didn’t give me a hard time from that point on. But I think about how it could have gone awry like how this lady wouldn’t listen to reason.
2:20

Whenever I feel there might be a conflict, or if the neighbor likes to be difficult I will always get a survey first before even saying anything. Once that’s in hand I will then let them know I am planning a fence or doing something else. I feel that way they can’t argue with the facts but sometimes they like to anyways. This woman knows the fence isn’t on her property and even avoids it by a few feet. Yet she starts removing the fence as it’s being built, would you stand for this? How do you stop someone who won’t respect the lines? I think the best way is to document everything with paperwork and video. Install a camera so there is proof they are doing what they are doing. I always try to cover my end that’s why I always have cameras everywhere. I never know when I might need it. If I end up in court then it’s no longer here say with evidence. I try to avoid confrontation as much as I can but sometimes it’s unavoidable. I’ve always lived life the way I see fit and I try to always do the right thing. I refuse to let others dictate how I do things especially if my way is proven to be effective. Dealing with stubborn neighbors can be drab but eventually it will work out, it’s the time in between that’s frustrating. The last time I did the fence. The neighbor at first tried to didn’t like the idea she would have a fence on one side of her driveway in case she opened the door and hit it. I explained to her that sometimes there may be kids playing and that I didn’t want a stray toy or ball to hit her house or car. At the end of the day she was reasonable and didn’t give me a hard time from that point on. But I think about how it could have gone awry like how this lady wouldn’t listen to reason.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

140,595 views • 1 month ago

Senator Pauline Hanson is blowing up on UK TalkTV as she voices what so many are feeling - the Islamification threat to our way of life. Calling Britain a cautionary tale and urging Australia to monitor Muslim Immigration before it’s too late. ‘Hang on a minute, if you want to come here . Don’t wear the burka. You respect our laws. Your treated the same as every other Australian. But don’t go out thinking you’re going to bring in Sharia Law into our country - because I’ll oppose it.’ Ahead of the curve as always.
2:04

Senator Pauline Hanson is blowing up on UK TalkTV as she voices what so many are feeling - the Islamification threat to our way of life. Calling Britain a cautionary tale and urging Australia to monitor Muslim Immigration before it’s too late. ‘Hang on a minute, if you want to come here . Don’t wear the burka. You respect our laws. Your treated the same as every other Australian. But don’t go out thinking you’re going to bring in Sharia Law into our country - because I’ll oppose it.’ Ahead of the curve as always.

Kat A 🌸

73,855 views • 4 months ago

An Ancient Pattern, Repeating in a Modern Costume “There is nothing new under the sun.” — Ecclesiastes 1:9 From Pharaoh’s magicians.. to Judas and the Sanhedrin.. to medieval indulgence sellers.. to modern financial engineering.. The pattern is always the same: 1 A scarce asset emerges that reorders power. 2 Incumbent elites recognize the threat before the public does. 3 Law is weaponized, not to protect justice, but to manufacture permission. 4 Narratives are inverted: owners become “wrongdoers,” predators become “stewards.” 5 Official channels provide moral cover while assets quietly change hands. This is not conspiracy. This is history. The Timeless Tactic: Law as a Weapon, Not a Shield Law, when severed from moral truth, becomes the most effective weapon ever created. Why? Because: It appears righteous It intimidates the uninformed It grants plausible deniability It transfers property without visible violence Under common law and divine law alike, law exists to protect property and consent. When law is used to redefine ownership rather than defend it, fraud has already entered, even if no court ever names it. The “Official Narrative” Problem Here’s where discernment matters most. Official channels don’t exist to reveal truth. They exist to establish legitimacy. That legitimacy is often created by: • Procedural complexity • Credentialed authority • Media repetition • Silence of dissent through cost & fear History is merciless on this point: • Jesus was executed with full legal process • Slavery was upheld by courts and statutes • Banking panics were “lawful” • Asset seizures have always been “court approved” Legality has never equaled morality. Why “Cover Stories” Are Always Necessary If the underlying action were just, no cover story would be required. Cover stories emerge when: • Property must be transferred without consent • Time is needed to suppress clarity • Complexity is required to exhaust resistance • The public must be told “this is for your protection” This is why modern financial disputes are never simple. Simplicity reveals intent. Complexity conceals motive. The Strategic Gravity of Ripple Let’s state a plain, observable fact: The infrastructure Ripple is building sits at the center of the next global financial architecture. That makes proximity to it strategically priceless. In every era: • Those closest to new rails of power accumulate first • They do so before clarity arrives • And often during confusion This is not unique to crypto. It happened with railroads, oil, telecom, the internet, and central banking. Discernment asks not “Who said what?” But “Who benefits from delay, dilution, fear, or forced restructuring?” The Inversion Principle (How Fraud Hides in Plain Sight) One of the oldest tricks: • Owners are reframed as risks • Consent is reframed as obstruction • Seizure is reframed as stabilization • Silence is reframed as compliance Christ warned us directly: “They will put you out of the synagogue; indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God.” — John 16:2 In modern terms: Those who do harm will sincerely claim righteousness - backed by institutions. Why Discernment Must Override Reporting Reporting shows what is said. Discernment reveals what is happening. Discernment asks: • Are property rights preserved? • Is consent honored? • Are incentives aligned with stated goals? • Does the process clarify… or obscure? The Closing Truth We don’t need to accuse anyone We don’t need secret evidence We don’t need insider leaks We only need this immutable test: Truth simplifies. Fraud complicates. Justice clarifies. Theft obscures. That law can be abused is not controversial. That powerful actors do so is not rare. That official narratives often serve as cover is not new. What’s rare is a people willing to see clearly, speak carefully, and refuse to confuse legality with righteousness Linqto
1:13

An Ancient Pattern, Repeating in a Modern Costume “There is nothing new under the sun.” — Ecclesiastes 1:9 From Pharaoh’s magicians.. to Judas and the Sanhedrin.. to medieval indulgence sellers.. to modern financial engineering.. The pattern is always the same: 1 A scarce asset emerges that reorders power. 2 Incumbent elites recognize the threat before the public does. 3 Law is weaponized, not to protect justice, but to manufacture permission. 4 Narratives are inverted: owners become “wrongdoers,” predators become “stewards.” 5 Official channels provide moral cover while assets quietly change hands. This is not conspiracy. This is history. The Timeless Tactic: Law as a Weapon, Not a Shield Law, when severed from moral truth, becomes the most effective weapon ever created. Why? Because: It appears righteous It intimidates the uninformed It grants plausible deniability It transfers property without visible violence Under common law and divine law alike, law exists to protect property and consent. When law is used to redefine ownership rather than defend it, fraud has already entered, even if no court ever names it. The “Official Narrative” Problem Here’s where discernment matters most. Official channels don’t exist to reveal truth. They exist to establish legitimacy. That legitimacy is often created by: • Procedural complexity • Credentialed authority • Media repetition • Silence of dissent through cost & fear History is merciless on this point: • Jesus was executed with full legal process • Slavery was upheld by courts and statutes • Banking panics were “lawful” • Asset seizures have always been “court approved” Legality has never equaled morality. Why “Cover Stories” Are Always Necessary If the underlying action were just, no cover story would be required. Cover stories emerge when: • Property must be transferred without consent • Time is needed to suppress clarity • Complexity is required to exhaust resistance • The public must be told “this is for your protection” This is why modern financial disputes are never simple. Simplicity reveals intent. Complexity conceals motive. The Strategic Gravity of Ripple Let’s state a plain, observable fact: The infrastructure Ripple is building sits at the center of the next global financial architecture. That makes proximity to it strategically priceless. In every era: • Those closest to new rails of power accumulate first • They do so before clarity arrives • And often during confusion This is not unique to crypto. It happened with railroads, oil, telecom, the internet, and central banking. Discernment asks not “Who said what?” But “Who benefits from delay, dilution, fear, or forced restructuring?” The Inversion Principle (How Fraud Hides in Plain Sight) One of the oldest tricks: • Owners are reframed as risks • Consent is reframed as obstruction • Seizure is reframed as stabilization • Silence is reframed as compliance Christ warned us directly: “They will put you out of the synagogue; indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God.” — John 16:2 In modern terms: Those who do harm will sincerely claim righteousness - backed by institutions. Why Discernment Must Override Reporting Reporting shows what is said. Discernment reveals what is happening. Discernment asks: • Are property rights preserved? • Is consent honored? • Are incentives aligned with stated goals? • Does the process clarify… or obscure? The Closing Truth We don’t need to accuse anyone We don’t need secret evidence We don’t need insider leaks We only need this immutable test: Truth simplifies. Fraud complicates. Justice clarifies. Theft obscures. That law can be abused is not controversial. That powerful actors do so is not rare. That official narratives often serve as cover is not new. What’s rare is a people willing to see clearly, speak carefully, and refuse to confuse legality with righteousness Linqto

Rob Cunningham | KUWL.show

12,899 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says, "...To those who abuse Muslims and demand a certificate of loyalty from us, we went through a lot and we will face a lot tomorrow as well, but we never hated our nation. We told the oppressors that we hate them and that if they are suppressing Muslims, they are weakening India. How will India become a developed country if you view Muslims with hatred and do injustice to them?...The mosque (Ayodhya disputed site) judgment was not in our favour, but did a Muslim go to the Court and hurl a shoe at any judge? Nothing is said about the one who actually hurled the shoe because he belongs to the majority community. We have always loved the nation, and we will always love it..." (23.11.2025) (Video Source: AIMIM)
2:11

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says, "...To those who abuse Muslims and demand a certificate of loyalty from us, we went through a lot and we will face a lot tomorrow as well, but we never hated our nation. We told the oppressors that we hate them and that if they are suppressing Muslims, they are weakening India. How will India become a developed country if you view Muslims with hatred and do injustice to them?...The mosque (Ayodhya disputed site) judgment was not in our favour, but did a Muslim go to the Court and hurl a shoe at any judge? Nothing is said about the one who actually hurled the shoe because he belongs to the majority community. We have always loved the nation, and we will always love it..." (23.11.2025) (Video Source: AIMIM)

ANI

45,326 views • 8 months ago

As a man, it is always important to record liberal women when you are challenging their views in public. They will use the bias against men in order to try to frame you for as being threatening or dangerous, simply for sharing data that they don’t like. Telling her that I have Male strength post transition was framed as a threat. Her feigned fear and obvious narcissism sets my hackles on edge. This kind of woman is a type of woman that I’m genuinely afraid of.
2:59

Sensitive content

As a man, it is always important to record liberal women when you are challenging their views in public. They will use the bias against men in order to try to frame you for as being threatening or dangerous, simply for sharing data that they don’t like. Telling her that I have Male strength post transition was framed as a threat. Her feigned fear and obvious narcissism sets my hackles on edge. This kind of woman is a type of woman that I’m genuinely afraid of.

The Transphobic Historian

64,431 views • 2 months ago

"I ask the Supreme Court to issue its decision on what Election Day means. Steve Hilton, Spencer Pratt, and I are not going to stop. We will fight for this state. We can achieve a change of government in California. California deserves a gold standard when it comes to the way it conducts elections. It is a shame that this is happening as we approach the 4th of July, and also the 250 year anniversary of the founding of this country. My promise to all Californians is that the Hilton-Romero administration, as Governor and Lieutenant Governor, is going to start changing all these laws quickly with the legislature or in the courts, and always with the people. And those who are guilty are going to pay the price."
1:20

"I ask the Supreme Court to issue its decision on what Election Day means. Steve Hilton, Spencer Pratt, and I are not going to stop. We will fight for this state. We can achieve a change of government in California. California deserves a gold standard when it comes to the way it conducts elections. It is a shame that this is happening as we approach the 4th of July, and also the 250 year anniversary of the founding of this country. My promise to all Californians is that the Hilton-Romero administration, as Governor and Lieutenant Governor, is going to start changing all these laws quickly with the legislature or in the courts, and always with the people. And those who are guilty are going to pay the price."

GloriaRomero

10,160 views • 2 months ago

President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. This oath is taken only by the President and the Governors. If you look at the Indian Constitution, the President is the first part of the Parliament. Second and third are Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Recent there was a directive to the President, by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for this. President being called upon to decide in a time-bound manner, and if not, it becomes law. So we have judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super Parliament, and absolutely have no accountability because law of the land does not apply to them. Every Parliamentarian, and every candidate in any election to assembly or Parliament is required to declare assets. They just don't do it. Some do, some don't. #RajyaSabha
2:16

President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. This oath is taken only by the President and the Governors. If you look at the Indian Constitution, the President is the first part of the Parliament. Second and third are Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Recent there was a directive to the President, by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for this. President being called upon to decide in a time-bound manner, and if not, it becomes law. So we have judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super Parliament, and absolutely have no accountability because law of the land does not apply to them. Every Parliamentarian, and every candidate in any election to assembly or Parliament is required to declare assets. They just don't do it. Some do, some don't. #RajyaSabha

Vice-President of India

462,523 views • 1 year ago