Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Listen in full to this man answer a direct question about 3,000 murdered children & his refusal to call for a ceasefire. If you watch to the end he again says it’s Israel’s right of defence. As clear as you can get. He is defending collective punishment. Defending war crime.

26,898 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

FIONA SHAW Ⓥ🌱 🇵🇸 💙#BDS #pwME #Pigoneer's profile picture
FIONA SHAW Ⓥ🌱 🇵🇸 💙#BDS #pwME #Pigoneer2 years ago

@MICHAEL37656467

Soweto Kinch's profile picture
Soweto Kinch2 years ago

It’s not just the sanctioning of war crimes and genocide It’s his sanctimonious tone and distilled c*ntishness

Debbie Baker's profile picture
Debbie Baker2 years ago

He needs to go

aharring's profile picture
aharring2 years ago

What makes him think things will freeze? The answer to this lies in international law - end the siege, occupation, forced displacement, apartheid etc .. that’s the requirement. Sanctions and penalties until Israel complies #UN

Xmifi🦋's profile picture
Xmifi🦋2 years ago

Kick him out and bring Corbyn back. Or even better, send him to the tory. They would love him.

Monica 🇵🇸🇨🇦's profile picture
Monica 🇵🇸🇨🇦2 years ago

Not even a breath of sympathy for murdered children . We will never let him forget .

El-Capitano 🇵🇸's profile picture
El-Capitano 🇵🇸2 years ago

This man is PURE EVIL 💯

Francesca's profile picture
Francesca2 years ago

Absolutely disgraceful.

Real G. Nhari's profile picture
Real G. Nhari2 years ago

@Keir_Starmer this is disgraceful

Toni Bolam's profile picture
Toni Bolam2 years ago

And he has the gall to wear a poppy

Related Videos

Why can’t politicians just answer simple questions about their job? Sophy Ridge asked Defence Secretary Wes Streeting a straightforward question he should have been ready for. You’d expect the person in charge of defence to have a clear position on the spending target for his own department, yet he repeatedly dodged it. She asked if he agreed with his predecessor John Healey, who said he was certain Britain should reach 3% of GDP on defence by 2030: “Are you also certain about 3% of GDP by 2030? Is that a target?” Streeting: “I endorsed John Healey’s resignation letter wholeheartedly at the time. What you will see from Andy Burnham and John Healey as prime minister and chancellor is a commitment to make sure the defence investment plan is fully funded.” That’s not an answer. Sophy cut in: “I’m going to have to come in again. You are the Defence Secretary, do you believe in the target of spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030?” He again referred back to agreeing with Healey and then talked at length about setting out “what we will fund and how we will fund it.” Still no direct answer. Clearly frustrated, Sophy tried once more: “I’m not asking you to set out how you’re going to fund it. I’m asking, do you believe in the target that we should be spending 3% by 2030?” His reply? He wouldn’t answer because the next question would be about how to fund it. That is a ridiculous reason to refuse a basic question about your own brief. Just answer it. Absolutely pathetic.

J Stewart

41,512 views • 1 month ago