Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Listen to the CDS statement again you will get the answer. " there were some tactical mistakes, remidet and we flew all of our jets after 2 days and targeted from long range " #IAF adopted the strategy to keep their jets away from Pakistani border at least 300+...

22,110 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Aalsi Indian
The Aalsi Indianvor 1 Jahr

Cool story about the PAF jets bro. I mean it's horseshit and has exactly 0 proof, but still cool story. Next time bring evidence.

Profilbild von #FreeKashmir
#FreeKashmirvor 1 Jahr

Dont be so technical jaan. Endians won't understand

Profilbild von Subash Chandra
Subash Chandravor 1 Jahr

> PAF JF17 jets violated Indian airspace, conducted airstrike at Srinagar and Adhampur airbases . LMAO. 🤡🤡🤡 The only evidence of anything on the ground being struck come from IAF's SATELLITE pics. They shared dozens of pics and videos. Meanwhile, PAF:

Profilbild von Dr. Tushar Mishra
Dr. Tushar Mishravor 1 Jahr

You expect some losses when you're going on a strike mission that too without SEAD & against an airforce that has decent offensive & defensive capability & is on highest alert since 2 weeks waiting just for you. Still you hit 9 targets with precision. PAF failed to protect++

Profilbild von devpy
devpyvor 1 Jahr

Don't argue with them, they have lost all senses lmao

Profilbild von Cynic-101 🇵🇰🍁
Cynic-101 🇵🇰🍁vor 1 Jahr

Some 14K satellites, out of which around 2K used for imaging, radar sensing, navigation support, and signal intelligence. And these idiots think they can fool the entire defence world with narrative and info. war, the entire world (which matters) knows what happened to them 😑

Profilbild von Shahbaz Airbase 🌚
Shahbaz Airbase 🌚vor 1 Jahr

So SU30MKIs staying 300 km inside Indian territory fired 300 or 400 km range Brahmos to hit the target located at 200 km (Bholari) 300km ( JaCobabad ) from Indian borders..

Profilbild von Rajamani
Rajamanivor 1 Jahr

What do you make out of "targeting from long range"? Our jets positioned at long range or setting targets deep inside Pakistan? May 10th bombardments point to the second option🐷🤡😂🤣 You certainly lack cognitive abilities. You entered our airspace & doesn't have any evidence🤡

Profilbild von Vneet Walia
Vneet Waliavor 1 Jahr

Professionals Talk like One ☝️ They Don't Live in Delusion & Don't Feed Delusional Stuff to their Country. None of which Can be understood by an Unemployed Troll Or Majority Population of a Failed State called Paxtan 👿

Profilbild von TAHYR EKBAL
TAHYR EKBALvor 1 Jahr

Hindu KO peshab aur Pani may farq Nahi pata aur chalain Hain jet uraney. Bastard hindu

Ähnliche Videos

As part of Operation Sindoor, the Army was given 7 targets near the borders, and the Air Force was given 2, which were deep inside. The Army delivered fully. The Air Force achieved what they were assigned but lost nearly five fighter jets, including Rafale, according to Captain Shiv Kumar, our Defence Attaché to Indonesia. A Defence Attaché, is a high-ranking member of a country's armed forces who is assigned to an embassy or diplomatic mission in another country. Their role is to represent their country’s defence establishment abroad and manage military and defence relations with the host nation. *Why and how did we lose our jets?* When we started the operation, our political leadership tied the Air Force’s hands, saying they should not target Pakistani military assets, including their jets, as we were not crossing the airspace. This was in line with Dr. S. Jaishankar's call to Pakistan at the start of the operation, telling our enemy about our objectives promising not to attack their military targets. But the Pakistani Air Force had a free hand and targeted our military assets, including our fighter jets. Our pilots couldn’t retaliate as they were ordered not to do so by Modi, Ajit Doval, Rajnath Singh, and S. Jaishankar, who are clueless about military operations and strategy. This led to the loss of our jets. This is the strategic blunder the CDS referred to in his interview to Bloomberg. Within two days, our Air Force earned a free hand and they achieved the objectives, successfully destroying the targets, including Pakistani military establishments, as seen in satellite imagery. These self-proclaimed 56-inch buffoons are good at spreading hate, fakery, and buffoonery. They have no clue about statecraft or war strategy. Turns out, it's easier to run WhatsApp forwards than actual military operations.

Congress Kerala

49,486 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Local from Dinga, Pakistan, have claimed that a massive fire broke out on farmland on the night of 8 May, reportedly started by farmers. Shortly afterward, two Pakistan Air Force (PAF) fighter jets were observed flying at very low altitude over the area, leading residents to believe that an aircraft may have crashed. According to local accounts, the PAF later stated that the fighter jets were conducting a low-level flight to inspect the wildfire. However, the incident has raised serious questions, as the same area had earlier yielded debris believed to be from an S-400 40N6 missile booster. A local resident quoted a conversation with the Station House Officer (SHO) of Gujrat district, stating: “Nothing to worry about what happened at Dinga last night. I called the SHO Gujrat. Ignore all the videos and TikToks that are circulating about the fire.” Despite these assurances, satellite imagery reportedly shows a large fire signature in the same location. Furthermore, Pakistani police were seen cordoning off the area — with photographic and video evidence available — adding to suspicions surrounding the incident. Key unanswered questions remain: Why were PAF fighter jets deployed at low altitude over a civilian farmland fire? Why was the area sealed off by police if it was merely a routine wildfire? Why was debris from an S-400 40N6 missile booster found in the same location? Was this a standard Search and Rescue (SAR) protocol operation? Is the PAF attempting to conceal the loss of an aircraft? The coincidence of a major fire, restricted access, military air activity, and missile debris in the same area suggests that the incident may be far more serious than officially acknowledged.

idrw

12,611 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

PAF 🇵🇰 pilot Sqn Ldr Ali of the J-10C from No. 15th 'Cobras' Sqn of the PAF claims that he was responsible for downing Several IAF 🇮🇳 jets on 7-8th May Aerial Battle, he says the score is ''8-Nil and it could have been more'' ''Bhaijaan, Pilot sahab English mein interview de rahe hain, toh kuch toh kiya hoga.'' The same logic works here, Pakistanis believe in this logic, 90% of their population won't even ask for proofs or reality of these claims and the one who asks is sent to another dimension by army. He also claims that the PAF successfully defended its airspace, strategic infrastructure and military assets. But despite all these massive claims, PAF has still failed to provide a single independently verifiable proof. No confirmed wreckage, No satellite assessment, No combat footage, No geolocated evidence and literally Nothing. and satellite images released by India show clear damage, destruction and ''begging for stop'' position of PAF... Meanwhile, the IAF on the 1st day of conflict released measurable evidence like Before-and-after satellite imagery of targeted airbases, Commercial satellite damage assessments, Precision strikes on terror infrastructure, Confirmed hits on military installations and HAS and destruction of total 13+ Aircrafts on Ground+air. IAF focused on operational evidence. PAF focused on fake morale narratives (they are good at it, from '47) I want to say, in Moden warfare, Narratives may boost morale but its Reality in the end which determines outcomes.

INTEL-24

74,883 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten