Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

LMFAAAAAAOOOOOOO

12,085,389 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Itsphe
Itsphe3 лет назад

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Фото профиля 𝙆𝙉𝘿𝙍𝙓𝙓
𝙆𝙉𝘿𝙍𝙓𝙓3 лет назад

bro the song puhleeeaseee 😂

Фото профиля kbr
kbr3 лет назад

@katttgraham shit has me so weak 😭

Фото профиля Bekoe
Bekoe3 лет назад

At first glance I thought this was meek mill

Фото профиля Nick D'Orazio
Nick D'Orazio3 лет назад

@islajae Bro went from 35 with a job to 3 and a half with a snack on the way REAL QUICK. Are the cartoon kicks working??

Фото профиля ELLZ ³³³ 🍄
ELLZ ³³³ 🍄3 лет назад

😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

Фото профиля innercityfolie.🖤
innercityfolie.🖤3 лет назад

Dawg 😂😂 astro boy never took the shoes off 😂

Фото профиля monáe 𓅓 🇺🇸
monáe 𓅓 🇺🇸3 лет назад

@theGoat_Dawn

Фото профиля Ya Muva
Ya Muva3 лет назад

@roseglowhoney 😂😂😂 now he cant take em off!!

Фото профиля Sir Dick Bastardly 🇨🇴
Sir Dick Bastardly 🇨🇴3 лет назад

I know that ankle meat ready to fall off the bone after you take them joints off

Похожие видео

THE CONSTITUTION PROTECTS PROTEST — NOT A PRIVILEGE TO DISOBEY THE LAW. JANTAR MANTAR, THE COCKROACH JANTA PARTY AND THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DISSENT The Delhi High Court's questions to CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka go to the heart of constitutional democracy. If you have executed a peace bond, what legal justification permits you to disregard its conditions? If Parliament has provided a statutory appellate remedy under Section 414 BNSS for specified security and surety orders, why bypass that remedy without establishing exceptional grounds? And if the Government has designated alternative protest sites, why insist upon entering a restricted location rather than pursuing lawful remedies? THE RIGHT TO PROTEST IS NOT THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHICH LAWS ONE WILL OBEY. But the Constitution places an equally serious duty upon the State. A PEACE BOND CANNOT BECOME A BOND OF POLITICAL SILENCE. No administration may use preventive powers to punish citizens merely for expressing dissent. Every restriction must satisfy the law; every detention must withstand judicial scrutiny. THE CONSTITUTION RECOGNISES NEITHER AN UNACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT NOR AN UNACCOUNTABLE PROTESTER. Political passion cannot replace legal discipline. State authority cannot replace constitutional restraint. THE RULE OF LAW IS NOT A WEAPON TO BE USED AGAINST ONE SIDE. IT IS THE STANDARD BY WHICH BOTH SIDES MUST BE JUDGED. — NK Goswami Advocate, Supreme Court of India #DelhiHighCourt #JantarMantar #CockroachJantaParty #RightToProtest #SupremeCourt #BNSS #SauravDas #AshutoshRanka #DelhiPolice #Article226 #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionOfIndia #NKGoswami Cockroaches of India Cockroach Janta Party - CJP Cockroach Janta Party Rahul Gandhi Prashant Bhushan Mahesh Jethmalani Kapil Sibal Akhilesh Yadav Mohan Bhagwat RSS Donald J. Trump Elon Musk Sanjay Singh AAP Sanjay Dutt

NK GOSWAMI

388,656 просмотров • 16 дней назад