正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

LOG // CASE STUDY: THE SKY VECTOR FIELD NOTE: #00-817 LOCATION: URBAN TRANSIT // AIR CORRIDOR OBJECT: BLACKOUT FLOCK ASSEMBLY Consider a flock of crows cutting through the gray sky at dawn. They do not carry wires, and their wings are made of feathers, not carbon fiber. They fly...

__US17__'s profile picture

IWNH

37,201 subscribers

13,576 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

17 条评论

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃 的头像
𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃3 个月前

ACK/

Wizard J Magik 的头像
Wizard J Magik3 个月前

Frequency received.

Leonid Probst 的头像
Leonid Probst3 个月前

Would me not wonder but they have the technology

Canis argentīnus 9999 的头像
Canis argentīnus 99993 个月前

"The flock is the antenna." Swarm intelligence.

Gokusiano035 (Josekun35) 的头像
Gokusiano035 (Josekun35)3 个月前

Legolas.

Gokusiano035 (Josekun35) 的头像
Gokusiano035 (Josekun35)3 个月前

Tolkien lo sabia.

UFO COIN 的头像
UFO COIN3 个月前

Time for takeoff

Paddy Patrick 的头像
Paddy Patrick3 个月前

LoVe it about the bird s.Allway.s Admired the bird.s.ThankQ.

LeahWen D 的头像
LeahWen D3 个月前

2:37 7:26 🤔

Omar Fernandez reyes 的头像
Omar Fernandez reyes3 个月前

LA MENTIRA ES PARA LOS ESTUPIDOS , BASTA YA DE EXTRA-TERRESTRES , NO MAS MENTIRAS , COMIDA PARA LOS PAISES POBRES ,NO MAS GUERRAS ,NO MAS DESTRUCCION DE PAISES SOVERANOS , INVIERTAN MAS EN NUTRIR LOS NINOS HAMBRIENTOS , LAS PERSONAS DE LA TERCERA EDAD , DEJEN DE ENGANAR PERSONAS

Leonel Villa 的头像
Leonel Villa3 个月前

What a bunch of shit.!

DerekIsSuspectedOfWriting1967 的头像
DerekIsSuspectedOfWriting19673 个月前

…Which BROS single does Burger King like best.

daniel j blatecky 的头像
daniel j blatecky3 个月前

Bull shit & doesn't count

Pronouns: I/My/Mine 的头像
Pronouns: I/My/Mine3 个月前

AI is a die hard biotechnology not a chatroom dude

E d 的头像
E d3 个月前

QYESQLOVEQYES QGOLDENQSILVERQPLATINUM QRAYDIANT QRAYNBOWQRAYZ QALBAZEQAFLAME QTRIFOLDFLAMEZ QDNAQRNAQLUMINONA QKRYSTALLINEQDYAMOND QHEARTCORESOURCECODEZ QBRIDGEQBEQGRIDZ QTEMPLATEZ QUANTUM LOVE QPORTALLZ QACTIVATEZ QIGNITEZ QPULSEZ QPUMPZ QNOVAQNOW Q101101Q QUE Q

Andrea Williams 的头像
Andrea Williams3 个月前

💙🔥

li chongci 的头像
li chongci3 个月前

要進入免費能源了嗎？🤗🤗🤗

相关视频

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.
3:46

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.

Vote Canada

55,634 次观看 • 10 个月前

American shows up in a disco suit and his own homemade Flock safety camera that he made in his garage to the Lee’s Summit, Missouri City Council meeting He’s exposing how the city spent $909,000 on only 54 Flock cameras the cameras remain property of Flock. Even if the contract runs its course and they cancel, Flock will keep the cameras despite paying nearly a million dollars for them It’s true I looked into the flock contracts and they maintain all rights and ownership over the cameras, once installed the city can’t even move the location of the cameras or remove them - Flock hardware “is owned and shall remain the exclusive property of Flock.” - “Title to any Flock Hardware shall not pass to [the city].” A The city may not remove, move or take possession of the units - At the end of the term, Flock removes the cameras The city is leasing the cameras and using the software…. This sounds like one of the biggest ripoffs to taxpayers in history That’s $16,833 per camera over the 5 year contract
5:12

American shows up in a disco suit and his own homemade Flock safety camera that he made in his garage to the Lee’s Summit, Missouri City Council meeting He’s exposing how the city spent $909,000 on only 54 Flock cameras the cameras remain property of Flock. Even if the contract runs its course and they cancel, Flock will keep the cameras despite paying nearly a million dollars for them It’s true I looked into the flock contracts and they maintain all rights and ownership over the cameras, once installed the city can’t even move the location of the cameras or remove them - Flock hardware “is owned and shall remain the exclusive property of Flock.” - “Title to any Flock Hardware shall not pass to [the city].” A The city may not remove, move or take possession of the units - At the end of the term, Flock removes the cameras The city is leasing the cameras and using the software…. This sounds like one of the biggest ripoffs to taxpayers in history That’s $16,833 per camera over the 5 year contract

Wall Street Apes

1,343,775 次观看 • 18 天前

A Canadian artist built a tiny open-air aircraft and convinced an entire flock of wild geese that he was their mother. Back in 1993, Bill Lishman had a theory that he could teach migratory birds new flight paths from scratch. He started by raising a flock of orphaned Canada geese from the exact moment they hatched. He spent months conditioning the young birds. He got them used to the loud engine noise and the specific shape of his custom ultralight aircraft. When it was time for the birds to head south for the winter, he climbed into the pilot seat and took off from his home in Ontario. The entire flock fell into a perfect V-shaped formation right behind his wings. He led the birds on a multi-day journey across the sky, flying just inches away from them all the way to a wintering ground in Virginia, in the eastern US. He landed, left the birds to settle in, and went back home. The real test came the following spring. Without any guidance or the sound of the aircraft engine to follow, the geese took off from Virginia. They successfully navigated the exact same route and made it all the way back to Canada completely on their own.
1:52

A Canadian artist built a tiny open-air aircraft and convinced an entire flock of wild geese that he was their mother. Back in 1993, Bill Lishman had a theory that he could teach migratory birds new flight paths from scratch. He started by raising a flock of orphaned Canada geese from the exact moment they hatched. He spent months conditioning the young birds. He got them used to the loud engine noise and the specific shape of his custom ultralight aircraft. When it was time for the birds to head south for the winter, he climbed into the pilot seat and took off from his home in Ontario. The entire flock fell into a perfect V-shaped formation right behind his wings. He led the birds on a multi-day journey across the sky, flying just inches away from them all the way to a wintering ground in Virginia, in the eastern US. He landed, left the birds to settle in, and went back home. The real test came the following spring. Without any guidance or the sound of the aircraft engine to follow, the geese took off from Virginia. They successfully navigated the exact same route and made it all the way back to Canada completely on their own.

Lemma the Optimist

26,519 次观看 • 4 个月前

“University Of Washington professor learns crows don’t forget a face”— It is not just how the crows remembered, but how the information was transferred to EVERY crow in a 25 mile radius in hours. The story: “To test the birds’ recognition of faces separately from that of clothing, gait and other individual human characteristics, Marzluff and two students wore rubber masks. He designated a caveman mask as ‘dangerous’ and, in a deliberate gesture of civic generosity, a Dick Cheney mask as “neutral.” Researchers in the dangerous mask then trapped and banded seven crows on the university’s campus in Seattle. In the months that followed, the researchers and volunteers donned the masks on campus, this time walking prescribed routes and not bothering crows. The crows had not forgotten. They scolded people in the dangerous mask significantly more than they did before they were trapped, even when the mask was disguised with a hat or worn upside down. The neutral mask provoked little reaction. The effect has not only persisted, but also multiplied over the past two years. Wearing the dangerous mask on one recent walk through campus, Marzluff said, he was scolded by 47 of the 53 crows he encountered, many more than had experienced or witnessed the initial trapping. The researchers hypothesize that crows learn to recognize threatening humans from both parents and others in their flock. ‘Spectacular’ results After their experiments on campus, Marzluff and his students tested the effect with more realistic masks. Using a half-dozen students as models, they enlisted a professional mask maker, then wore the new masks while trapping crows at several sites in and around Seattle. The researchers then gave a mix of neutral and dangerous masks to volunteer observers who, unaware of the masks’ histories, wore them at the trapping sites and recorded the crows’ responses. The reaction to one of the dangerous masks was ‘quite spectacular,’ said one volunteer, Bill Pochmerski, a retired telephone-company manager who lives near Snohomish. ‘The birds were really raucous, screaming persistently,’ he said, ‘and it was clear they weren’t upset about something in general. They were upset with me.’ Again, crows were significantly more likely to scold observers who wore a dangerous mask, and when confronted simultaneously by observers in dangerous and neutral masks, the birds almost unerringly chose to persecute the dangerous face. In downtown Seattle, where most passers-by ignore crows, angry birds nearly touched their human foes. In rural areas, where crows are more likely to be viewed as noisy ‘flying rats’ and shot, the birds expressed their displeasure from a distance. Though Marzluff’s is the first formal study of human-face recognition in wild birds, his preliminary findings confirm the suspicions of many other researchers who have observed similar abilities in crows, ravens, gulls and other species” If we don’t have a cohesive theory on the “outliers”, we have no theory.
0:58

“University Of Washington professor learns crows don’t forget a face”— It is not just how the crows remembered, but how the information was transferred to EVERY crow in a 25 mile radius in hours. The story: “To test the birds’ recognition of faces separately from that of clothing, gait and other individual human characteristics, Marzluff and two students wore rubber masks. He designated a caveman mask as ‘dangerous’ and, in a deliberate gesture of civic generosity, a Dick Cheney mask as “neutral.” Researchers in the dangerous mask then trapped and banded seven crows on the university’s campus in Seattle. In the months that followed, the researchers and volunteers donned the masks on campus, this time walking prescribed routes and not bothering crows. The crows had not forgotten. They scolded people in the dangerous mask significantly more than they did before they were trapped, even when the mask was disguised with a hat or worn upside down. The neutral mask provoked little reaction. The effect has not only persisted, but also multiplied over the past two years. Wearing the dangerous mask on one recent walk through campus, Marzluff said, he was scolded by 47 of the 53 crows he encountered, many more than had experienced or witnessed the initial trapping. The researchers hypothesize that crows learn to recognize threatening humans from both parents and others in their flock. ‘Spectacular’ results After their experiments on campus, Marzluff and his students tested the effect with more realistic masks. Using a half-dozen students as models, they enlisted a professional mask maker, then wore the new masks while trapping crows at several sites in and around Seattle. The researchers then gave a mix of neutral and dangerous masks to volunteer observers who, unaware of the masks’ histories, wore them at the trapping sites and recorded the crows’ responses. The reaction to one of the dangerous masks was ‘quite spectacular,’ said one volunteer, Bill Pochmerski, a retired telephone-company manager who lives near Snohomish. ‘The birds were really raucous, screaming persistently,’ he said, ‘and it was clear they weren’t upset about something in general. They were upset with me.’ Again, crows were significantly more likely to scold observers who wore a dangerous mask, and when confronted simultaneously by observers in dangerous and neutral masks, the birds almost unerringly chose to persecute the dangerous face. In downtown Seattle, where most passers-by ignore crows, angry birds nearly touched their human foes. In rural areas, where crows are more likely to be viewed as noisy ‘flying rats’ and shot, the birds expressed their displeasure from a distance. Though Marzluff’s is the first formal study of human-face recognition in wild birds, his preliminary findings confirm the suspicions of many other researchers who have observed similar abilities in crows, ravens, gulls and other species” If we don’t have a cohesive theory on the “outliers”, we have no theory.

Brian Roemmele

344,787 次观看 • 2 年前

First thing first, they're called peafowls. Only the males are called peacock while the females are called peahens. The name peacock overshadowed the general name for the birds because it is only the male that has that flamboyant tail feathers. The females are beautiful in their own ways but feature subtler colors like gray and brown, not blue. Any peacock you see with the flamboyant fantail is at least 3 years old. When peachicks first hatch and for many months after, the little males and females are impossible to tell apart. They both have the soft, fluffy, and modest brown colour. After three months, the males will start developing colours but they won't have the brilliant tail feathers until they're three. If you need the peacock's feather, you don't need to pluck it forcefully. Just be patient. At the end of every mating season, peacocks undergo molting. This is when they naturally shed their feathers and regrow them longer and fuller ahead of the following mating season. The feathers are used to woo females. Peahens are like those hungry girls that don't have a car but judge a man with Corolla. Even though they don't have the fantails, they will inspect the males properly before picking him as mate. The feathers, the display, the angle and the illusion it creates, these are all judged before the male is found worthy.
0:26

First thing first, they're called peafowls. Only the males are called peacock while the females are called peahens. The name peacock overshadowed the general name for the birds because it is only the male that has that flamboyant tail feathers. The females are beautiful in their own ways but feature subtler colors like gray and brown, not blue. Any peacock you see with the flamboyant fantail is at least 3 years old. When peachicks first hatch and for many months after, the little males and females are impossible to tell apart. They both have the soft, fluffy, and modest brown colour. After three months, the males will start developing colours but they won't have the brilliant tail feathers until they're three. If you need the peacock's feather, you don't need to pluck it forcefully. Just be patient. At the end of every mating season, peacocks undergo molting. This is when they naturally shed their feathers and regrow them longer and fuller ahead of the following mating season. The feathers are used to woo females. Peahens are like those hungry girls that don't have a car but judge a man with Corolla. Even though they don't have the fantails, they will inspect the males properly before picking him as mate. The feathers, the display, the angle and the illusion it creates, these are all judged before the male is found worthy.

Arojinle

262,456 次观看 • 10 个月前

Nothing but love for families at the #InvictusGames! #IAMHere 💛🖤 The Invictus Games isn't just for the competitors, they are able to bring two members of their family or friends with them and they are as much a part of the Games as any competitor on the field. #DayOfFamilies
2:39

Nothing but love for families at the #InvictusGames! #IAMHere 💛🖤 The Invictus Games isn't just for the competitors, they are able to bring two members of their family or friends with them and they are as much a part of the Games as any competitor on the field. #DayOfFamilies

Invictus Games Foundation 💛🖤

34,155 次观看 • 2 年前

Bald eagles are massive birds. You just don’t realize how big they are until you have the pleasure of being so close to them that you can actually hear the wind as it moves through their feathers and if you are lucky enough to have one look you in the eye, then you’ll never look at them the same way again.
0:41

Bald eagles are massive birds. You just don’t realize how big they are until you have the pleasure of being so close to them that you can actually hear the wind as it moves through their feathers and if you are lucky enough to have one look you in the eye, then you’ll never look at them the same way again.

Mark Smith Photography

33,594 次观看 • 1 年前

Festivals like the Raulane Mela are among the last living traditions that have stayed alive in the Himalayas for generations. In places like Kinnaur, these celebrations are not just rituals. They are a bond between people, their mountains and the spirits they believe protect their lives. In the hills, people always take the name of their local gods first. These deities are part of their daily life. They are the ones they call upon before any other god. This faith comes from the heart and from the land they live on. The Raulane Mela reminds us of this deep connection. Men dress up, dance and carry forward a tradition that their ancestors kept alive. They honor the Saunie, the protective spirits of the meadows. They pray for good times, safety and harmony. And the whole village comes together to send these spirits back to their homes in the high mountains. These traditions are not just festivals. They are identity, memory, and the soul of the people who live in these valleys. They hold stories that are older than we can imagine. And that is why they must be protected. If such traditions disappear, a part of the Himalayas will disappear with them.
0:23

Festivals like the Raulane Mela are among the last living traditions that have stayed alive in the Himalayas for generations. In places like Kinnaur, these celebrations are not just rituals. They are a bond between people, their mountains and the spirits they believe protect their lives. In the hills, people always take the name of their local gods first. These deities are part of their daily life. They are the ones they call upon before any other god. This faith comes from the heart and from the land they live on. The Raulane Mela reminds us of this deep connection. Men dress up, dance and carry forward a tradition that their ancestors kept alive. They honor the Saunie, the protective spirits of the meadows. They pray for good times, safety and harmony. And the whole village comes together to send these spirits back to their homes in the high mountains. These traditions are not just festivals. They are identity, memory, and the soul of the people who live in these valleys. They hold stories that are older than we can imagine. And that is why they must be protected. If such traditions disappear, a part of the Himalayas will disappear with them.

Kumaon Jagran

112,816 次观看 • 10 个月前

A little girl brings a Crucifix to a couple who are getting married—a beautiful marriage tradition. When the bride and groom go to the church to be married, they carry a Crucifix with them. The priest blesses the Crucifix, and instead of saying that they have found the ideal partner with whom to share their lives, he exclaims, “You have found your Cross! It is a Cross to love, to carry with you—a Cross that is not to be thrown off, but rather cherished.” When they exchange their marital vows, the bride places her right hand on the Crucifix, and the groom places his right hand over hers. Both are bound together and united to the Cross. The priest covers their hands with his stole while they pronounce their promises to love one another in good times and in bad, proclaiming their vows to be faithful according to the rites of the Church. Then, they first kiss the Cross—not each other. If one abandons the other, they abandon Christ on the Cross. They lose Jesus! After the wedding, the newlyweds cross the threshold of their home to enthrone that same Crucifix in a place of honor. It becomes the reference point of their lives and the center of family prayer, for the young couple believes deeply that the family is born of the Cross. Video: Júlia Carvalho
0:27

A little girl brings a Crucifix to a couple who are getting married—a beautiful marriage tradition. When the bride and groom go to the church to be married, they carry a Crucifix with them. The priest blesses the Crucifix, and instead of saying that they have found the ideal partner with whom to share their lives, he exclaims, “You have found your Cross! It is a Cross to love, to carry with you—a Cross that is not to be thrown off, but rather cherished.” When they exchange their marital vows, the bride places her right hand on the Crucifix, and the groom places his right hand over hers. Both are bound together and united to the Cross. The priest covers their hands with his stole while they pronounce their promises to love one another in good times and in bad, proclaiming their vows to be faithful according to the rites of the Church. Then, they first kiss the Cross—not each other. If one abandons the other, they abandon Christ on the Cross. They lose Jesus! After the wedding, the newlyweds cross the threshold of their home to enthrone that same Crucifix in a place of honor. It becomes the reference point of their lives and the center of family prayer, for the young couple believes deeply that the family is born of the Cross. Video: Júlia Carvalho

Sachin Jose

130,942 次观看 • 8 个月前

Watching German police raid homes over memes while these gremlins on the police force GIGGLE needs to be more unsettling and a huge RED TENT not a red flag. Wasn’t the entire purpose of WW2 and millions of lost lives to GET RID of the Stasi? Remember ..WW2 only occurred because of the treaty of WW1. They dehumanized a whole nation of people and took their resources ..they attempted to deindustrialize Germany like they are NOW…hit them with reparations in the trillions adjusted for inflation nobody could be afford..stole their identity as a nation…their hubris in wanting to DUNK on Germany created a scorned nation and Hitler..and they are about to do it again but this time they are raiding homes of citizens that disagree with the direction of Germany Remember..mark my words in the EU they will move to ban X to stop the free flow of ideas. It’s almost as if now realizing they lost the attempt at the NWO in America they are concentrating all their efforts on the EU. Remember…throughout history this is how you cause the TERRIBLE RESULTS you are trying to avoid. Hitler may not be at the front of the room speaking at this moment ..but there is always Hitler like figure somewhere in the back of the room..waiting their turn to speak.
0:52

Watching German police raid homes over memes while these gremlins on the police force GIGGLE needs to be more unsettling and a huge RED TENT not a red flag. Wasn’t the entire purpose of WW2 and millions of lost lives to GET RID of the Stasi? Remember ..WW2 only occurred because of the treaty of WW1. They dehumanized a whole nation of people and took their resources ..they attempted to deindustrialize Germany like they are NOW…hit them with reparations in the trillions adjusted for inflation nobody could be afford..stole their identity as a nation…their hubris in wanting to DUNK on Germany created a scorned nation and Hitler..and they are about to do it again but this time they are raiding homes of citizens that disagree with the direction of Germany Remember..mark my words in the EU they will move to ban X to stop the free flow of ideas. It’s almost as if now realizing they lost the attempt at the NWO in America they are concentrating all their efforts on the EU. Remember…throughout history this is how you cause the TERRIBLE RESULTS you are trying to avoid. Hitler may not be at the front of the room speaking at this moment ..but there is always Hitler like figure somewhere in the back of the room..waiting their turn to speak.

Johnny St.Pete

156,747 次观看 • 1 年前

These young ladies were waiting for their luggage, over a half an hour went by and still nothing. They were later called over to the airline kiosk and they got their luggage back. According to the representative, the luggage was damaged in transit. What makes it strange is it was all of the luggage from the same family, what are the odds of that happening since they weren’t all checked in at the same time. Does the airline owe them a better explanation as well as a check for their belongings?
0:32

These young ladies were waiting for their luggage, over a half an hour went by and still nothing. They were later called over to the airline kiosk and they got their luggage back. According to the representative, the luggage was damaged in transit. What makes it strange is it was all of the luggage from the same family, what are the odds of that happening since they weren’t all checked in at the same time. Does the airline owe them a better explanation as well as a check for their belongings?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

922,226 次观看 • 6 个月前

Some employees of a catering company is making a marketing video for their mobile catering business. They had gotten permission from the manager of the parking lot they were in. In the middle of the video, a woman comes and demands that they leave, that they will attract animals, and then proceeds to dump their food all over the ground. She happens to be a board member at the at the local country club they were pitching their marketing for. Seeing how she treats people, should she be removed as a board member or should she be charged for destroying their food?
1:59

Some employees of a catering company is making a marketing video for their mobile catering business. They had gotten permission from the manager of the parking lot they were in. In the middle of the video, a woman comes and demands that they leave, that they will attract animals, and then proceeds to dump their food all over the ground. She happens to be a board member at the at the local country club they were pitching their marketing for. Seeing how she treats people, should she be removed as a board member or should she be charged for destroying their food?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

80,780 次观看 • 8 个月前

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.
5:02

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

Orwell Day

25,952 次观看 • 1 个月前

Lia kim, one of the most famous choreographer talking about mamamoo being so good and rich in talent they had artists flock to their rehearsal just to catch a glimpse of it. Saying they are known for their performance and power. Mamamoo is the standard
0:31

Lia kim, one of the most famous choreographer talking about mamamoo being so good and rich in talent they had artists flock to their rehearsal just to catch a glimpse of it. Saying they are known for their performance and power. Mamamoo is the standard

Gio ❖ commissions open!

42,945 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨WHAT THE FLOCK🚨 A Flock Safety salesperson emailed the City of Sheboygan offering to sell the city five years of traffic-speed and movement data collected by cameras the city already purchased. The Sheboygan mayor says Flock NEVER informed them the cameras were tracking that form of data. Sheboygan has since bagged its 15 cameras and is moving to cancel the contract. That sales pitch followed years of Flock telling customers they own the data and that the company keeps footage only 30 days. Flock still insists it does not sell the data.
1:00

🚨WHAT THE FLOCK🚨 A Flock Safety salesperson emailed the City of Sheboygan offering to sell the city five years of traffic-speed and movement data collected by cameras the city already purchased. The Sheboygan mayor says Flock NEVER informed them the cameras were tracking that form of data. Sheboygan has since bagged its 15 cameras and is moving to cancel the contract. That sales pitch followed years of Flock telling customers they own the data and that the company keeps footage only 30 days. Flock still insists it does not sell the data.

Breanna Morello

25,494 次观看 • 24 天前

🚨 BREAKING: There's a heavy police presence at the Universal Ostrich Farm in Edgewood, where CFIA officers are at the scene to carry out the cull order on a flock of 400 ostriches. There is no virus among these birds, and this is typical Canadian government overreach. Police and officials with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. They were met by dozens of protesters in support of the birds and the farm’s owner. WE CANNOT LET THIS HAPPEN
1:26

🚨 BREAKING: There's a heavy police presence at the Universal Ostrich Farm in Edgewood, where CFIA officers are at the scene to carry out the cull order on a flock of 400 ostriches. There is no virus among these birds, and this is typical Canadian government overreach. Police and officials with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. They were met by dozens of protesters in support of the birds and the farm’s owner. WE CANNOT LET THIS HAPPEN

Brendan Miller

879,769 次观看 • 1 年前