Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Logical Kirk!!!!!
10 Comments
This is an example of someone who is willing to listen and examine the reasoning behind the opposing point of view.
Charlie Kirk is so logical and calm. It gives these kids common sense without talking down to them. That’s a gift. I’ve seen some of these kids. He talks to, and I wanna grab them by the arm and put them on timeout. You’re doing Gods work, Charlie.
I mean they already did this with the nba as it was too white and excluded African Americans. That is when the league became based on ability, skill, collegiate merit and marketability. The league became 75% black because they are the best players when given a fair shot. Duh
There's nothing wrong with healthy competition. It's how we improve.
The assumption non white people “aren’t qualified” is the problem. I’ve been working as a recruiter for over 20 years. I’ve seen so many black and brown people not get jobs despite being highly qualified simply because they weren’t “articulate enough.” Not logical. Racist.
There’s nothing logical about this analogy! In football and basketball they have combines where every individual has their skills measured.. it’s not a race thing it’s a skill thing
I'm a fan of yours and you have a point...However just to be clear the NBA is trying to diversity by getting more European players to broaden the audience..
Its about giving all the best a fair shot at getting the position, be it sport or any other aspect of life, why should someone need to go get a masters degree together a position that a college dropout got easily because of what they look like
Style of play would drastically change. It isn’t just about raw speed or pure athleticism. Wouldn’t get worse. Kirk has a cuck point of view here.
We just seen shedeur sanders Drop 5 rounds because what ..he was weak ok This people are pea brains 🧠 Talking to the blind
![The most important development yet to drop in the assassination of Charlie Kirk is this clip right here, where Candace Owens states that she has multiple sources who claim to have written communications from Charlie the day before he was murdered stating that he thought “they” were going to kill him [with one of those sources being a TPUSA donor]. This would also corroborate the conversation that Infowars news anchor Harrison H. Smith ✞ had [who is not affiliated with TPUSA] one month before Charlie Kirk was killed, where he was told that Charlie thought Israel would kill him if he abandoned the pro-Israel cause [which led to Harrison’s now infamous tweet stating just that back on 8/13/2025]. Candace has no discernible incentive to lie about the existence and veracity of these messages. She already produced the text exchange proving that Charlie was getting intense pressure from his Jewish donors and expressed a desire to abandon the pro-Israel cause just 48 hours before he was killed. This was a fact that everyone in the pro-Israel camp denied for almost a month following Charlie’s death, up to and including Bibi Netanyahu. We now know most of those people were either outright lying or uniformed. In both cases, the existence and verification of those messages by TPUSA spokesman and Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has changed the entire conversation. Why did the people in the group chat or those who knew about Charlie’s evolving views lie about it? I think there’s a strong possibility that these [alleged] messages will see the light at some point, assuming these individuals aren’t in legitimate fear for their own lives and/or have the courage to come forward. At a minimum, these communications should be provided to law enforcement if they haven’t been already as part of the investigation [assuming the FBI actually plans to conduct a real one]. If so, we may end up seeing them in court. We know Candace has extensive connections and relationships within the TPUSA network, including with donors, as is evident by the recent letter from John Mappin and Irina Mappin. To doubt the authenticity of this claim, which she says is in writing from two sources and known by at least 3, would be extremely naive, IMO. It doesn’t make sense for her to lie about this. The liability is far too great. Given the above, it appears to be almost a certainty that Charlie Kirk thought that there was a possibility he was going to be murdered by pro-Israel forces, at least in part due to the decision he had made to distance himself and TPUSA from the Israeli/Jewish cause. Now you need to ask yourself, what would make Charlie feel that way? Why would he feel strongly enough about the possibility of being assassinated that he would communicate that in both conversation and in writing, including to at least one TPUSA donor? Bear in mind, confiding in a wealthy donor to the organization about your fear of being killed is no small decision. Did something happen to Charlie that created this fear? It’s logical to ask, was he ever explicitly [or implicitly] threatened? Was he aware of similar things happening to others? If the above is true … what are the odds he was actually assassinated by a random 22 year-old trans loving furry Zoomer on the following day, on a campus 4 hours away from where Tyler Robinson lived, at a school he wasn’t a student at? If Charlie’s fears were true and warranted, I think we’d be foolish to ignore them. Who would be in a better position to know “from who” and “why” he could be at risk than Charlie himself? Every thread should be pulled and every stone lifted and turned. Charlie’s memory, family, friends and supporters deserve nothing less.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1976524212798894471/amplify_video_thumb/1976524134633865216/img/XNelXkArXGHCIqTU.jpg)