Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Logical Problem Of The Trinity Explained In 3 Minutes. 🤯💣
62,180 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)
41 Kommentare

Based on your summary, if I am human and you are human we must be the same person. Add violin music

Good explanation of the law of identity 👌🏻 Now, I understand why @muslimorthodoxy said this before about you👇🏻 Hopefully one day you will consider Islam @Metaphysicmike 🌹

Poor holy spirit! Always out of the equation.

Reducing God to his creation means you already lost the argument.

"God is a title" fixes this We are supposed to have no other gods before the Father, we serve our Heavenly Father as our God, through the name of the Son Jesus Christ. They are both (a) God and that's fine Serving any other god than them is not fine. We are to be united and one as they are united. Obsession with the number 1 is unnecessary platonism, that's it. It's simple. Stop fixating on the unit number one and just let three be three. Everyone forgets the Holy Ghost is also God and to learn more about how to gain his influence.

But if you use an relative identity operator and done define what you mean by God then you can just confuse people into thinking it makes sense.

In other words, three minutes of rhetorical sleight of hand designed to make an external criticism look like a legitimate internal one: impose Unitarian assumptions onto the Trinitarian framework, construct a dilemma from those assumptions, and then demand that Trinitarians answer for a contradiction they never affirmed. Unless, of course, you’re speaking to a room full of like-minded Unitarians, those three minutes accomplish very little. Dressing up a Unitarian presupposition as a Trinitarian refutation doesn’t make it one. Yes, I’d say those three minutes were wasted.

Whole lot of nothing here. 👍🏼 You literally addressed not a single thing in the argument. Honestly a weird rigmarole of a commentary.

Before a christian barks and claims it is an IS of predication not identity. This means that there is 3 Gods

This guy is Limited God to letters and Batman 🤣 You my guy are doing heresy

Genuinely sorry to break the news; but God is not above logic. You are lacking fundamental knowledge about God. Logic as we know it is literally grounded in Gods nature. He is not, and cannot have contradictions.

If I was a "Christian" and found myself preaching the same thing as Satan I would question it... Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:73):"Those who say, 'Allah is one in a Trinity,' have certainly fallen into disbelief. There is only One God. If they do not stop saying this, those who disbelieve among them will be afflicted with a painful punishment."

He's arguing really from the term "Godhead". Jesus does not equal the "Godhead". The Father does not equal the "Godhead". However, All three together "Father + Son + Holy Spirit" = The Godhead. The term "God" refers to a person or mode of the Godhead. So Jesus = God (person 1). The Father = God (person 2). And the Holy Spirit = God (person 3). So this guy is actually wrong, because he is swapping out God and Godhead.

That's why it falls apart on so many levels. Eg. An Apple is a fruit and an orange is a fruit, therefore an apple is an orange, same with trinity nonsense.

This person pronounces "Leibniz" and "transitivity"in the same way that someone would if they had never seen these words before they made the video

When you can't refute the argument, critique the pronunciation. Classic. Your name should be Karen.

Fun Fact, Leibnitz was a trinitarian, appealing to his law, just prove you never ever read/study his works 😂🤣

And Issac Newton was a Unitarian, you don’t understand Gravity, therefore I win.

As always, you came up with a stupid response🤣😂 According to your missuse of Leibniz Law, one of those isnt the titanic 🤡

Bingo. 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 (always). 3 distinct persons united into a single purpose.

very fair and unbiased explanation.

This dudes entire religion is just being Anti-Trinitarian. Never debates the historical view of Church hierarchy, liturgical worship, etc. he’s a one trick pony that’s been refuted by @JayDyer, @GodLogic_GL, @BruceSaiFun, etc.

May Allah guide you to Islam my sincere brother in humanity. Good explanation.

As Dr. Branson showed, your Unitarian god is not absolutely identical to the Father. You’re an Arian. Also, your Unitarian god lacks essential aseity. By making your god’s self-conception to be identical to itself, you made essentially conceived.

Interesting

As an atheist, if I were to choose between Islam, Trinitarian Christianity, and Unitarian Christianity, I would choose to be a Unitarian. I've never been convinced that Jesus claimed to be God, and Muhammad is clearly not a true prophet.

Bingo

The Father and Son are not identical in personhood, only identical in essence. Both persons share the same divine nature.

Yes, and I just explained in the video how that makes no sense. 🙏🏼

Love the vine booms with the classical music. It fits super well

If the trinity was the truth it would be simple enough for children and people with no education to understand. On the other hand in Islam; God/Allah = One, Nothing like Him, The Almighty Creator of All. Sends Messengers, with Messages(Scripture) to guide humanity. Simple.

There is no being like God and we can't fully understand his nature. He is greater than any being we can conceive. He transcends his creation. However, we can deduce from the Bible that God is 1 in nature yet distinct in persons: The Father, Son and Holyspirit.

That’s only trivially true, and does not justify the idea that God can have in him, or himself be, a contradiction.

Very true and logical, I might just have to nickname you the RealGodLogic, which is unlike the claims of 3-book @GodLogic_GL

Are this guys even alright at all ? Trying to use what we human made to solve some problem trying to use it to prove something supernatural, does that mean what we created exist before what we are trying to prove ? Where's y'all head

What would you call the single being that encompasses all 3 of Bruce Wayne, Batman, and the Dark Knight in your analogy?

lol actually such an easy answer that is perfectly logical. You just intentionally misunderstand how the words are used to justify your point. Dishonest so no point in engaging

@muslimorthodoxy

water. ice. steam. all h2o. all different forms of the same thing. different forms for different purposes. I’m not even religious but the Trinity problem has been “solved” for years. it’s a non issue in theology.

If only sound effects made your argument stronger.🤣

@orthodo
