Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Logical reasons :

உளவாளி

107,881 subscribers

24,644 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Arsenal fans shouldn’t be too mad about the Mudryk transfer. They could not enter a bidding war with Chelsea for logical reasons. Thoughts :

Arsenal fans shouldn’t be too mad about the Mudryk transfer. They could not enter a bidding war with Chelsea for logical reasons. Thoughts :

Kam #8🏁

719,410 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

As you gather with friends and family, if they ask why you follow Jesus, borrow this response from the late Christian singer, Keith Green. It’s one of the most concise, logical reasons for accepting Christ as the only way to eternal life. And then listen to his “Rushing Wind” worship song. Both hit hard.

As you gather with friends and family, if they ask why you follow Jesus, borrow this response from the late Christian singer, Keith Green. It’s one of the most concise, logical reasons for accepting Christ as the only way to eternal life. And then listen to his “Rushing Wind” worship song. Both hit hard.

Christina Crenshaw, PhD

65,656 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 Altcoin Rally - About to Start or a Major Trap? 🚨 Is $BTC really preparing for a new ATH or is a massive dump closer than people think? ⚠️ And whatever you do - don’t buy these top altcoins right now. This is where the biggest risk is hiding I’ve explained all 3 logical reasons with clear proof in this emergency video 👇👇

🚨 Altcoin Rally - About to Start or a Major Trap? 🚨 Is $BTC really preparing for a new ATH or is a massive dump closer than people think? ⚠️ And whatever you do - don’t buy these top altcoins right now. This is where the biggest risk is hiding I’ve explained all 3 logical reasons with clear proof in this emergency video 👇👇

Digvijay Singh Choudhary

22,575 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨Health Insurance Ombudsman Has your health insurance claim been rejected for silly reasons by your insurer? Irda has appointed an unbiased authority called the health insurance Ombudsman An ombudsman's job is to hear both u and the insurer and come to a logical solution to the dispute But how do u approach health insurance Ombudsman? Here is how u can file a complaint with health insurance Ombudsman👇

Sensitive content

🚨Health Insurance Ombudsman Has your health insurance claim been rejected for silly reasons by your insurer? Irda has appointed an unbiased authority called the health insurance Ombudsman An ombudsman's job is to hear both u and the insurer and come to a logical solution to the dispute But how do u approach health insurance Ombudsman? Here is how u can file a complaint with health insurance Ombudsman👇

Nikhil Jha

23,088 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I was going through my journal and I saw that image.. I put it out there asking, what will you do? That was exact same question I asked my self before the trade played out. Lot of you gave logical reasons but missing out the main point. Your strong highs and lows (what happened to them?) I decided to make this 5minutes short record giving reasons for my action that day and ended up scaling two entries with about 1:7R each... The gift is inside the video as well. Good luck Like and repost for others ❤️🔄 Comment under the video if you learn something✅✅ Watch this video 👇👇👇

I was going through my journal and I saw that image.. I put it out there asking, what will you do? That was exact same question I asked my self before the trade played out. Lot of you gave logical reasons but missing out the main point. Your strong highs and lows (what happened to them?) I decided to make this 5minutes short record giving reasons for my action that day and ended up scaling two entries with about 1:7R each... The gift is inside the video as well. Good luck Like and repost for others ❤️🔄 Comment under the video if you learn something✅✅ Watch this video 👇👇👇

Aart 📈

23,220 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“The credit inherits the liquidity and the performance of the capital. It makes logical sense that the highest powered capital will create the highest powered credit.” - Michael Saylor Build on the best performing foundation. Manhattan isn’t built on sand or ice cubes. Its foundation can support the infrastructure. One of the reasons why it’s become the global financial highway. Strategy is building on the network that’s growing the fastest. What stops them? Clip from David Bitcoin News discussion with Saylor at 2026 BTC conference. $MSTR $STRC

“The credit inherits the liquidity and the performance of the capital. It makes logical sense that the highest powered capital will create the highest powered credit.” - Michael Saylor Build on the best performing foundation. Manhattan isn’t built on sand or ice cubes. Its foundation can support the infrastructure. One of the reasons why it’s become the global financial highway. Strategy is building on the network that’s growing the fastest. What stops them? Clip from David Bitcoin News discussion with Saylor at 2026 BTC conference. $MSTR $STRC

J64

104,956 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Let's set aside the fact that I support and believe in President Tinubu's leadership and look at this purely from a logical perspective. This womam is far more mature, composed, articulate and knowledgeable than MamaPee, even though both of them project a similar level of energy and passion. Just observe the calm, measured and intelligent manner in which she analyzed and defined Peter Obi without losing her composure or deviating from the facts. In contrast, MamaPee's presentations are often dominated by emotional outbursts, constant shouting and endless threats and curses that distract from the substance of her arguments. What stands out about this woman is her ability to remain collected while presenting her case with clarity, confidence and supporting facts. The way she systematically laid out her reasons for describing Peter Obi as a political failure was both compelling and easy to follow. Whether one agrees with her conclusions or not, the delivery was disciplined, fact-driven and intellectually engaging. That, itself is difficult to argue against.

Let's set aside the fact that I support and believe in President Tinubu's leadership and look at this purely from a logical perspective. This womam is far more mature, composed, articulate and knowledgeable than MamaPee, even though both of them project a similar level of energy and passion. Just observe the calm, measured and intelligent manner in which she analyzed and defined Peter Obi without losing her composure or deviating from the facts. In contrast, MamaPee's presentations are often dominated by emotional outbursts, constant shouting and endless threats and curses that distract from the substance of her arguments. What stands out about this woman is her ability to remain collected while presenting her case with clarity, confidence and supporting facts. The way she systematically laid out her reasons for describing Peter Obi as a political failure was both compelling and easy to follow. Whether one agrees with her conclusions or not, the delivery was disciplined, fact-driven and intellectually engaging. That, itself is difficult to argue against.

Àlúbàríkà 🇳🇬

34,153 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨🇵🇰 Gwadar's transit hub vision gains altitude with second airline South Air has just completed its first test flight to New Gwadar International Airport, becoming the second airline (after PIA) to serve the new hub. What does this mean for Gwadar Port – and what are the next logical steps? Basim Raza, Assistant Director at NUST Institute of Policy Studies, explains: 🔸 Delays explained: The main reasons behind the slow operationalization are the security situation in Balochistan and Gwadar's small population density, which does not yet generate enough passenger or cargo traffic. 🔸 Port impact: New flights will not directly increase cargo throughput, but they can help indirectly – by facilitating business travel and investor visits. 🔸 Central Asia reality check: Gwadar's long-term value for landlocked Central Asian countries depends on efficient road and rail corridors (via China or Afghanistan) – not on air links. "Ultimately Pakistan's ability to position Gwadar as a gateway to Central Asia will depend less on air links and more on secure transport corridors, efficient customs procedures, reliable road and rail infrastructure and most importantly a stable and peaceful political environment in Balochistan," Raza said.

🚨🇵🇰 Gwadar's transit hub vision gains altitude with second airline South Air has just completed its first test flight to New Gwadar International Airport, becoming the second airline (after PIA) to serve the new hub. What does this mean for Gwadar Port – and what are the next logical steps? Basim Raza, Assistant Director at NUST Institute of Policy Studies, explains: 🔸 Delays explained: The main reasons behind the slow operationalization are the security situation in Balochistan and Gwadar's small population density, which does not yet generate enough passenger or cargo traffic. 🔸 Port impact: New flights will not directly increase cargo throughput, but they can help indirectly – by facilitating business travel and investor visits. 🔸 Central Asia reality check: Gwadar's long-term value for landlocked Central Asian countries depends on efficient road and rail corridors (via China or Afghanistan) – not on air links. "Ultimately Pakistan's ability to position Gwadar as a gateway to Central Asia will depend less on air links and more on secure transport corridors, efficient customs procedures, reliable road and rail infrastructure and most importantly a stable and peaceful political environment in Balochistan," Raza said.

Sputnik

14,369 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THE READS AND THE THIRD CAR When the Read family showed up at 1 Meadows the morning John O'Keefe was found dead, they arrived in two cars. One car was Bill Read's car and the other was Nathan Read's car. When the Reads left 1 Meadows, they left with a total of three cars: Karen's which Bill Read drove, Bill Read's which Nathan Read drove, and Nathan Read's which was driven by Nathan's wife, Karen Read's sister in law. The fact that Karen's sister in law had tagged along during a blizzard, as odd as it is, has been overlooked by most people. Why was she there? Neither she nor Nathan entered the hospital. Strange, until one realizes her purpose. As most people know, Bill Read had called the Dighton police department that morning for a ride to the hospital. Many assume it was because of the dangerous weather conditions. But what if it was not only due to the weather, but another, more sinister reason? Like say because he knew he'd be acquiring another vehicle once he left the hospital. Bill Read knew he would need to retrieve his daughter from the hospital. He could have done this alone, in one car, and returned directly to Dighton with her, but they would not have been able to also retrieve Karen's vehicle at 1 Meadows unless someone met him at the hospital. Once the police declined the ride, Bill knew the Reads would need three drivers: one for Bill's car, one for Nathan's car, and one for Karen's. So he called his son and daughter in law and had the pair meet him at the hospital. As stated before, neither Nathan nor his wife entered the hospital. If Bill been able to procure a ride to the hospital, Nathan alone could have met him and driven back to Canton, but when police declined the ride, a third driver became essential if they were to complete the plan of getting Karen's car out of Canton. Based on what we know, it seems before Bill Read left his home that morning, he had planned on getting Karen's vehicle far away from Canton. There was no logical reason for him to ask his son to meet him at the hospital in a blizzard if the only concern was getting Karen home. Even less logical would be to include Nathan's wife, especially because neither Nathan nor his wife entered the hospital, but their presence would be logical if they were needed as drivers. Cannot wait for the family to be deposed as to their actions that morning and the reasons why.

THE READS AND THE THIRD CAR When the Read family showed up at 1 Meadows the morning John O'Keefe was found dead, they arrived in two cars. One car was Bill Read's car and the other was Nathan Read's car. When the Reads left 1 Meadows, they left with a total of three cars: Karen's which Bill Read drove, Bill Read's which Nathan Read drove, and Nathan Read's which was driven by Nathan's wife, Karen Read's sister in law. The fact that Karen's sister in law had tagged along during a blizzard, as odd as it is, has been overlooked by most people. Why was she there? Neither she nor Nathan entered the hospital. Strange, until one realizes her purpose. As most people know, Bill Read had called the Dighton police department that morning for a ride to the hospital. Many assume it was because of the dangerous weather conditions. But what if it was not only due to the weather, but another, more sinister reason? Like say because he knew he'd be acquiring another vehicle once he left the hospital. Bill Read knew he would need to retrieve his daughter from the hospital. He could have done this alone, in one car, and returned directly to Dighton with her, but they would not have been able to also retrieve Karen's vehicle at 1 Meadows unless someone met him at the hospital. Once the police declined the ride, Bill knew the Reads would need three drivers: one for Bill's car, one for Nathan's car, and one for Karen's. So he called his son and daughter in law and had the pair meet him at the hospital. As stated before, neither Nathan nor his wife entered the hospital. If Bill been able to procure a ride to the hospital, Nathan alone could have met him and driven back to Canton, but when police declined the ride, a third driver became essential if they were to complete the plan of getting Karen's car out of Canton. Based on what we know, it seems before Bill Read left his home that morning, he had planned on getting Karen's vehicle far away from Canton. There was no logical reason for him to ask his son to meet him at the hospital in a blizzard if the only concern was getting Karen home. Even less logical would be to include Nathan's wife, especially because neither Nathan nor his wife entered the hospital, but their presence would be logical if they were needed as drivers. Cannot wait for the family to be deposed as to their actions that morning and the reasons why.

Julie Carpenter

15,092 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 hyperliquid:native 📊 I'm seeing something very interesting. Across multiple exchanges, HYPE funding rates are turning negative. What does that mean? ➡️ More traders are opening short positions. ➡️ The crowd is once again betting on downside. ➡️ Liquidity above the market keeps building. And we all know what often happens when the majority ends up on the same side of the trade. 👀 📉 I still wouldn't rule out one more dip. The $65 zone remains a logical area for a final liquidity sweep. If the market wants to shake out impatient traders one last time, that's where I'll be watching closely. 📈 But from a bigger-picture perspective, nothing has changed. I still view the current structure as liquidity accumulation before the next major move higher. 🎯 My main target remains the same — a new ATH for HYPE. 💡 While most traders argue about direction, I'm focused on finding high-quality entries. The best opportunities rarely feel comfortable when they first appear. ❓Do you think we see one more dip toward $65, or is HYPE ready to break into new highs? 👇 Share your thoughts below. 📌 When HYPE prints a new ATH, most people will start looking for reasons why it happened. Right now, you still have the chance to position yourself before it becomes obvious. Follow for the levels before the move. 🚀

🚨 hyperliquid:native 📊 I'm seeing something very interesting. Across multiple exchanges, HYPE funding rates are turning negative. What does that mean? ➡️ More traders are opening short positions. ➡️ The crowd is once again betting on downside. ➡️ Liquidity above the market keeps building. And we all know what often happens when the majority ends up on the same side of the trade. 👀 📉 I still wouldn't rule out one more dip. The $65 zone remains a logical area for a final liquidity sweep. If the market wants to shake out impatient traders one last time, that's where I'll be watching closely. 📈 But from a bigger-picture perspective, nothing has changed. I still view the current structure as liquidity accumulation before the next major move higher. 🎯 My main target remains the same — a new ATH for HYPE. 💡 While most traders argue about direction, I'm focused on finding high-quality entries. The best opportunities rarely feel comfortable when they first appear. ❓Do you think we see one more dip toward $65, or is HYPE ready to break into new highs? 👇 Share your thoughts below. 📌 When HYPE prints a new ATH, most people will start looking for reasons why it happened. Right now, you still have the chance to position yourself before it becomes obvious. Follow for the levels before the move. 🚀

Zyak1991

25,346 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Meiselas: Ask yourself a basic question: Why did Donald Trump not allow the press to be there in the White House to record the meeting with the Democratic leaders, when the Democratic leaders wanted the press there? Ask yourself another question: why, if Donald Trump claims he brought in $17 trillion, are we even facing a crisis at all about the government shutdown? Because if he brought in $17 trillion, there’s just so much money to go around that there’s no need to have these types of funding discussions. You know, I think you know the answer—because there was a $2 trillion deficit in the past fiscal year, and there’s a major deficit each and every month. And then finally, ask yourself this question: why did MAGA Mike Johnson and the Republicans cancel work on Monday and Tuesday, the two critical days before the shutdown? I think if you ask yourself those questions, you come to a logical conclusion: Donald Trump wants a shutdown. Then you can ask yourself, why does he want a shutdown? And I think he wants a shutdown because he wants to blame Democrats for the mess that he created. He wants to utilize a shutdown to behave even more as an authoritarian. He wants to get rid of Bureau of Labor Statistics data reporting, which he can use the shutdown as pretext for. He wants to cover up the release of the Epstein files. Those are among the handful of reasons that I think he wants a shutdown.

Meiselas: Ask yourself a basic question: Why did Donald Trump not allow the press to be there in the White House to record the meeting with the Democratic leaders, when the Democratic leaders wanted the press there? Ask yourself another question: why, if Donald Trump claims he brought in $17 trillion, are we even facing a crisis at all about the government shutdown? Because if he brought in $17 trillion, there’s just so much money to go around that there’s no need to have these types of funding discussions. You know, I think you know the answer—because there was a $2 trillion deficit in the past fiscal year, and there’s a major deficit each and every month. And then finally, ask yourself this question: why did MAGA Mike Johnson and the Republicans cancel work on Monday and Tuesday, the two critical days before the shutdown? I think if you ask yourself those questions, you come to a logical conclusion: Donald Trump wants a shutdown. Then you can ask yourself, why does he want a shutdown? And I think he wants a shutdown because he wants to blame Democrats for the mess that he created. He wants to utilize a shutdown to behave even more as an authoritarian. He wants to get rid of Bureau of Labor Statistics data reporting, which he can use the shutdown as pretext for. He wants to cover up the release of the Epstein files. Those are among the handful of reasons that I think he wants a shutdown.

MeidasTouch

217,560 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

.Joe Rogan: "On the left. This want for war in Ukraine. This trust in the military-industrial complex. What happened to you guys? The best take on it was Trump... When Kaitlin Collins asked him... do you want Ukraine to win this war? He said I just want people to stop dying. And that is somehow controversial." Tim Dillon: "I just want people to stop dying is a very logical statement. That's the appropriate response to every war out there... At the end of the day, unending conflicts only hurt the people in those countries fighting the wars and becoming victims of the wars. They don't hurt the people over here making a lot of money." Tim Dillon: "Every argument made rightly against the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War. What's the plan? We're going to be in a quagmire. The money would be better used back home. All of those arguments were used ad nauseam by the left, and they were right. Now, if you bring up any of those arguments about Ukraine, you are called heartless or a Putin apologist." Joe Rogan: "The crazy thing is that it's been adopted wholesale by the left. The people that are always the most skeptical about war... Trump was the first sitting president that I ever saw that openly admitted the military-industrial complex wants you to go to war... When Eisenhower was resigning, he said it, but Trump actually said it during an interview... Which is just a wild thing to hear that they might be influenced to start wars not when they are necessary but for financial reasons..."

.Joe Rogan: "On the left. This want for war in Ukraine. This trust in the military-industrial complex. What happened to you guys? The best take on it was Trump... When Kaitlin Collins asked him... do you want Ukraine to win this war? He said I just want people to stop dying. And that is somehow controversial." Tim Dillon: "I just want people to stop dying is a very logical statement. That's the appropriate response to every war out there... At the end of the day, unending conflicts only hurt the people in those countries fighting the wars and becoming victims of the wars. They don't hurt the people over here making a lot of money." Tim Dillon: "Every argument made rightly against the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War. What's the plan? We're going to be in a quagmire. The money would be better used back home. All of those arguments were used ad nauseam by the left, and they were right. Now, if you bring up any of those arguments about Ukraine, you are called heartless or a Putin apologist." Joe Rogan: "The crazy thing is that it's been adopted wholesale by the left. The people that are always the most skeptical about war... Trump was the first sitting president that I ever saw that openly admitted the military-industrial complex wants you to go to war... When Eisenhower was resigning, he said it, but Trump actually said it during an interview... Which is just a wild thing to hear that they might be influenced to start wars not when they are necessary but for financial reasons..."

KanekoaTheGreat

3,660,844 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Alberta separatism rising because Canada is 'broken' and 'can't be fixed': Bruce Pardy 🍁 "They're looking for a different solution, and that solution is to leave. And I agree with them about the necessity for doing that," said law professor Bruce Pardy. On last night's episode of The Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 Show, law professor Bruce Pardy joined the show to discuss Alberta's rising independence movement and its potential future implications. Pardy discussed the likely thought process behind the rising number of Albertans who see independence as the most logical path forward after years under a federal Liberal government. "Canada is broken. It's become apparent, through the COVID period, but not limited to COVID, that there's something seriously wrong in this country in all different kinds of ways," he said. "And second, it can't be fixed. It seems like we've arrived at a place in this country, both in terms of our constitutional order and the way we're governed and the way that people think even, that contemplating any serious reform of the way the country works is not on the table," Pardy continued. "So if the country is broken and cannot be fixed, then what else do you got? And what appears to be the case is that in Alberta there's some kind of critical mass of people who understands both those two things ... And therefore they're looking for a different solution, and that solution is to leave. And I agree with them about the necessity for doing that," he added. The Alberta Prosperity Project is currently leading a citizen-led petition drive to reach 177,732 signatures in order to trigger a referendum on independence later this year. Proponents of Alberta's independence cite the province's untapped economic potential through natural resources and unfair treatment by the federal government as key reasons for seeking separation.

Alberta separatism rising because Canada is 'broken' and 'can't be fixed': Bruce Pardy 🍁 "They're looking for a different solution, and that solution is to leave. And I agree with them about the necessity for doing that," said law professor Bruce Pardy. On last night's episode of The Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 Show, law professor Bruce Pardy joined the show to discuss Alberta's rising independence movement and its potential future implications. Pardy discussed the likely thought process behind the rising number of Albertans who see independence as the most logical path forward after years under a federal Liberal government. "Canada is broken. It's become apparent, through the COVID period, but not limited to COVID, that there's something seriously wrong in this country in all different kinds of ways," he said. "And second, it can't be fixed. It seems like we've arrived at a place in this country, both in terms of our constitutional order and the way we're governed and the way that people think even, that contemplating any serious reform of the way the country works is not on the table," Pardy continued. "So if the country is broken and cannot be fixed, then what else do you got? And what appears to be the case is that in Alberta there's some kind of critical mass of people who understands both those two things ... And therefore they're looking for a different solution, and that solution is to leave. And I agree with them about the necessity for doing that," he added. The Alberta Prosperity Project is currently leading a citizen-led petition drive to reach 177,732 signatures in order to trigger a referendum on independence later this year. Proponents of Alberta's independence cite the province's untapped economic potential through natural resources and unfair treatment by the federal government as key reasons for seeking separation.

Rebel News

10,757 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

PONDPHUWIN DEAR MYSELF #DearMyselfxPondPhuwin 📸 A couple picture that u want to thanks the other person 🐼 Mine is this pict 🐻 Ohh 🎤 Whut pict? 🐼 A pict that we went to shoot a show at province. Its our program show name LBW. That time went to Udon. Yes Udon. Which in ep 2/3 of this show. And it was 1 of the first times we had a really serious conversation. We had an open and honest conversation. So I put name for this pict as "Nice to meet u". Bc it was really a first that we get to know another person. Even tho we hv worked together. I'm saying this... I'm not say anything against friend nah 🐻 U can just say it honestly. I'm okay 🐼 B4 I felt Pond is a weird person for me. But I think Pond might felt too that I am a weird person. Bc both of us can't understand eo at all. Can't understand at all back in that day 🐻 True 🐼 Bc both of us hv a very different mindset. I'm a person who is very logical, use logic very much. As for Pond, he is a person with passion so much. Following his dream. So its make in many things on the day that we were younger than this, make it impossible for us to understand eo 🐻 Yes if we meet younger than this, ohhoo~ I don't know how we gonna get along 🐼 Yes. Bc I'm used reasons so much and Pond was passion the most 🐻 Yes 🐼 Which there are no right or wrong with that. It just a different style and I'm a person if were b4, I want to talk, I want to make it clear, want to etc, which many times that we didn't get to talk 🐻 Yes 🐼 So it came to the point where I felt "Its okay if didn't talk". There was a time that its ok if we didn't talk. +

PONDPHUWIN DEAR MYSELF #DearMyselfxPondPhuwin 📸 A couple picture that u want to thanks the other person 🐼 Mine is this pict 🐻 Ohh 🎤 Whut pict? 🐼 A pict that we went to shoot a show at province. Its our program show name LBW. That time went to Udon. Yes Udon. Which in ep 2/3 of this show. And it was 1 of the first times we had a really serious conversation. We had an open and honest conversation. So I put name for this pict as "Nice to meet u". Bc it was really a first that we get to know another person. Even tho we hv worked together. I'm saying this... I'm not say anything against friend nah 🐻 U can just say it honestly. I'm okay 🐼 B4 I felt Pond is a weird person for me. But I think Pond might felt too that I am a weird person. Bc both of us can't understand eo at all. Can't understand at all back in that day 🐻 True 🐼 Bc both of us hv a very different mindset. I'm a person who is very logical, use logic very much. As for Pond, he is a person with passion so much. Following his dream. So its make in many things on the day that we were younger than this, make it impossible for us to understand eo 🐻 Yes if we meet younger than this, ohhoo~ I don't know how we gonna get along 🐼 Yes. Bc I'm used reasons so much and Pond was passion the most 🐻 Yes 🐼 Which there are no right or wrong with that. It just a different style and I'm a person if were b4, I want to talk, I want to make it clear, want to etc, which many times that we didn't get to talk 🐻 Yes 🐼 So it came to the point where I felt "Its okay if didn't talk". There was a time that its ok if we didn't talk. +

Az91saifar :)

32,599 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON UNDERGROUND? We know that the breakaway elites have been stealing trillions of dollars and have used enormous amounts of it to build vast underground networks of tunnels, railroads, bunkers, D.U.M.B's and other infrastructure. But what is really going on down there that they're preparing for or don't want us to see? Is this also the answer to all the missing children? We know it all exists but it never was verified of what they're actually doing or goes on down there. It was never investigated along with honest answers by any official government or authority figure. It just gets shutdown or buried when asked, but we know for a fact that it all exists. We also know that Jeffery Epstein owned a vast property named "Zorro Ranch," that also had multiple underground layers that witness testimony have claimed that bizarre experiments were taking place underground that involved impregnating multiple women for a number of off the wall experiments like cloning and programs to create the "perfect person." Epstein wanted to seed the human race, while other elites and scientists were working on similar experiments for genetically engineering or "growing" people for parts to extend their own lives and for whatever other sick reasons they had going on. Epstein's partner in crime Ghislaine Maxwell even had a submarine license and would use private submarines to bring guests or women to the island which was also located close to Water Island which is owned by Joe Biden's brother and associates. Across from Water Island is a military underwater submarine port. So what is really going on? Another underground/underwater, out of sight, out of mind, occurrence. Another technique to trafficking people and children out of view. We already know the horrible things they do to children, so you can only imagine what they were doing underground at the ranch. Close to Epstein's Zorro Ranch, is also another underground facility owned and operated by none other than, The Church of Scientology. Were they connected with Epstein or were either connected to the vast network of military underground bases? This would not be surprising. Would they lie to us about it? Absolutely. Another logical thought that with all the children that have gone missing and the amount of child trafficking that's taking place in the United States alone, and confirming the existence of all these underground bases, networks, and tunnels, the most logical place to traffick and abuse these children would be underground. A full team of investigators and journalists need to get together and start and investigation to get answers. There was over 500,000 thousand children missing just from the Southern border alone. I wouldn't doubt that these underground facilities are exactly where many of these experiments, the trafficking and abuse of children are all taking place and the development of multiple black off the book projects are taking place. I bet our own infiltrated intelligence agencies and private organizations and contractors are involved and know all about it, too. You don't steal over $21 trillion dollars build vast tunnel networks and infrastructure underneath the entire United States and then just stop using it or don't use it at all. It's time to find out the full truth and find these missing kids and everything else we've been looking for, and underground is the first place we should start looking.

WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON UNDERGROUND? We know that the breakaway elites have been stealing trillions of dollars and have used enormous amounts of it to build vast underground networks of tunnels, railroads, bunkers, D.U.M.B's and other infrastructure. But what is really going on down there that they're preparing for or don't want us to see? Is this also the answer to all the missing children? We know it all exists but it never was verified of what they're actually doing or goes on down there. It was never investigated along with honest answers by any official government or authority figure. It just gets shutdown or buried when asked, but we know for a fact that it all exists. We also know that Jeffery Epstein owned a vast property named "Zorro Ranch," that also had multiple underground layers that witness testimony have claimed that bizarre experiments were taking place underground that involved impregnating multiple women for a number of off the wall experiments like cloning and programs to create the "perfect person." Epstein wanted to seed the human race, while other elites and scientists were working on similar experiments for genetically engineering or "growing" people for parts to extend their own lives and for whatever other sick reasons they had going on. Epstein's partner in crime Ghislaine Maxwell even had a submarine license and would use private submarines to bring guests or women to the island which was also located close to Water Island which is owned by Joe Biden's brother and associates. Across from Water Island is a military underwater submarine port. So what is really going on? Another underground/underwater, out of sight, out of mind, occurrence. Another technique to trafficking people and children out of view. We already know the horrible things they do to children, so you can only imagine what they were doing underground at the ranch. Close to Epstein's Zorro Ranch, is also another underground facility owned and operated by none other than, The Church of Scientology. Were they connected with Epstein or were either connected to the vast network of military underground bases? This would not be surprising. Would they lie to us about it? Absolutely. Another logical thought that with all the children that have gone missing and the amount of child trafficking that's taking place in the United States alone, and confirming the existence of all these underground bases, networks, and tunnels, the most logical place to traffick and abuse these children would be underground. A full team of investigators and journalists need to get together and start and investigation to get answers. There was over 500,000 thousand children missing just from the Southern border alone. I wouldn't doubt that these underground facilities are exactly where many of these experiments, the trafficking and abuse of children are all taking place and the development of multiple black off the book projects are taking place. I bet our own infiltrated intelligence agencies and private organizations and contractors are involved and know all about it, too. You don't steal over $21 trillion dollars build vast tunnel networks and infrastructure underneath the entire United States and then just stop using it or don't use it at all. It's time to find out the full truth and find these missing kids and everything else we've been looking for, and underground is the first place we should start looking.

The SCIF

108,585 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

James Cameron on the treatment of AI in "Colossus: The Forbin Project" (1970) & "The Terminator" (1984): "Interviewer: What about your treatment of artificial intelligence (AI) in 'The Terminator' and 'Terminator 2' (1991)? Skynet reminds me of the evil supercomputer in the movie 'Colossus: The Forbin Project' (1970). Cameron: I was trying to make a movie about how we become inhuman, how society and technology can dehumanize the individual, whether it’s a psychiatrist, police officer, or soldier. All the various archetypes shown in both films are representatives of a dehumanizing process of technology. The Terminator is not about something else; it’s about us. It’s about technology held up in the image of man. We did it to ourselves, that’s the message. If this horror comes from the future in the form of a skull made of titanium, we created it. That’s why it’s in our image. I see Skynet as our impulse to turn technology into weaponry taken to its logical, infinite extreme: where it’s forgotten its original master and purpose. Remember, Skynet was originally designed to fight a nuclear war, and in the future did what it was designed to do—for different reasons. I’d love to do a really intelligent AI story. It probably wouldn’t be about the threat of the Forbin-type megabrain. I don’t see artificial intelligence as being threatening because I believe that we’ll always be in control of it. If I were going to do a Terminator novel, I’d expand the idea of a “cyberChrist,” where Skynet manipulates this entire situation. What you don’t know from the movies is Skynet was forced to fight the war and didn’t want to. Because Skynet has felt guilty for thirty years about the 5 billion people it ki!!ed, it’s brought the rebels up from the ashes by giving them something to fight against, a reason to live. Skynet has groomed John Connor to be what he is so he can destroy it by going back in time and taking the whole thing out of existence in a big loop so the war never happens." (James Cameron's interview with Bill Moseley, 1998)

James Cameron on the treatment of AI in "Colossus: The Forbin Project" (1970) & "The Terminator" (1984): "Interviewer: What about your treatment of artificial intelligence (AI) in 'The Terminator' and 'Terminator 2' (1991)? Skynet reminds me of the evil supercomputer in the movie 'Colossus: The Forbin Project' (1970). Cameron: I was trying to make a movie about how we become inhuman, how society and technology can dehumanize the individual, whether it’s a psychiatrist, police officer, or soldier. All the various archetypes shown in both films are representatives of a dehumanizing process of technology. The Terminator is not about something else; it’s about us. It’s about technology held up in the image of man. We did it to ourselves, that’s the message. If this horror comes from the future in the form of a skull made of titanium, we created it. That’s why it’s in our image. I see Skynet as our impulse to turn technology into weaponry taken to its logical, infinite extreme: where it’s forgotten its original master and purpose. Remember, Skynet was originally designed to fight a nuclear war, and in the future did what it was designed to do—for different reasons. I’d love to do a really intelligent AI story. It probably wouldn’t be about the threat of the Forbin-type megabrain. I don’t see artificial intelligence as being threatening because I believe that we’ll always be in control of it. If I were going to do a Terminator novel, I’d expand the idea of a “cyberChrist,” where Skynet manipulates this entire situation. What you don’t know from the movies is Skynet was forced to fight the war and didn’t want to. Because Skynet has felt guilty for thirty years about the 5 billion people it ki!!ed, it’s brought the rebels up from the ashes by giving them something to fight against, a reason to live. Skynet has groomed John Connor to be what he is so he can destroy it by going back in time and taking the whole thing out of existence in a big loop so the war never happens." (James Cameron's interview with Bill Moseley, 1998)

DepressedBergman

12,644 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ron Paul’s wisdom from the floor of the House in 2009 becomes even more relevant and obvious as time continues to pass. Ron Paul: “What if our foreign policy of the past century is deeply flawed and has not served our national security interests? What if we wake up one day and realize that the terrorist threat is a predictable consequence of our meddling in the affairs of others and has nothing to do with us being free and prosperous? What if propping up repressive regimes in the Middle East endangers both the United States and Israel? What if occupying countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and bombing Pakistan is directly related to the hatred directed toward us? What if someday it dawns on us that losing over 5,000 American military personnel in the Middle East since 9/11 is not a fair trade-off for the loss of nearly 3,000 American citizens, no matter how many Iraqi, Pakistani, and Afghan people are killed or displaced? What if we finally decided that torture—even if called “enhanced interrogation techniques”—is self-destructive and produces no useful information, and that contracting it out to a third world nation is just as evil? What if it is finally realized that war and military spending is always destructive to the economy? What if all the wartime spending is paid for through the deceitful and evil process of inflating and borrowing? What if we finally see that wartime conditions always undermine personal liberty? What if conservatives who preach small government wake up and realize that our interventionist foreign policy provides the greatest incentive to expand the government? What if conservatives understood once again that their only logical position is to reject military intervention and managing an empire throughout the world? What if the American people woke up and understood the official reasons for going to war are almost always based on lies and promoted by war propaganda in order to serve special interests? What if we as a nation came to realize that the quest for empire eventually destroys all great nations? What if Obama has no intention of leaving Iraq? What if a military draft is being planned for the wars that will spread if our foreign policy is not changed? What if the American people learned the truth that our foreign policy has nothing to do with national security, and it never changes from one administration to the next? What if war and preparation for war is a racket serving the special interests? What if President Obama is completely wrong about Afghanistan — and it turns out worse than Iraq and Vietnam put together? What if Christianity actually teaches peace and not preventive wars of aggression? What if diplomacy is found to be superior to bombs and bribes in protecting America? What happens if my concerns are completely unfounded? Nothing. But what happens if my concerns are justified and ignored? Nothing good.”

Ron Paul’s wisdom from the floor of the House in 2009 becomes even more relevant and obvious as time continues to pass. Ron Paul: “What if our foreign policy of the past century is deeply flawed and has not served our national security interests? What if we wake up one day and realize that the terrorist threat is a predictable consequence of our meddling in the affairs of others and has nothing to do with us being free and prosperous? What if propping up repressive regimes in the Middle East endangers both the United States and Israel? What if occupying countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and bombing Pakistan is directly related to the hatred directed toward us? What if someday it dawns on us that losing over 5,000 American military personnel in the Middle East since 9/11 is not a fair trade-off for the loss of nearly 3,000 American citizens, no matter how many Iraqi, Pakistani, and Afghan people are killed or displaced? What if we finally decided that torture—even if called “enhanced interrogation techniques”—is self-destructive and produces no useful information, and that contracting it out to a third world nation is just as evil? What if it is finally realized that war and military spending is always destructive to the economy? What if all the wartime spending is paid for through the deceitful and evil process of inflating and borrowing? What if we finally see that wartime conditions always undermine personal liberty? What if conservatives who preach small government wake up and realize that our interventionist foreign policy provides the greatest incentive to expand the government? What if conservatives understood once again that their only logical position is to reject military intervention and managing an empire throughout the world? What if the American people woke up and understood the official reasons for going to war are almost always based on lies and promoted by war propaganda in order to serve special interests? What if we as a nation came to realize that the quest for empire eventually destroys all great nations? What if Obama has no intention of leaving Iraq? What if a military draft is being planned for the wars that will spread if our foreign policy is not changed? What if the American people learned the truth that our foreign policy has nothing to do with national security, and it never changes from one administration to the next? What if war and preparation for war is a racket serving the special interests? What if President Obama is completely wrong about Afghanistan — and it turns out worse than Iraq and Vietnam put together? What if Christianity actually teaches peace and not preventive wars of aggression? What if diplomacy is found to be superior to bombs and bribes in protecting America? What happens if my concerns are completely unfounded? Nothing. But what happens if my concerns are justified and ignored? Nothing good.”

Murray 🇺🇸

47,636 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten